Book contents
- The Local Impact of the International Criminal Court
- The Local Impact of the International Criminal Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 A Framework for Assessing the Impact of the ICC
- 2 Systemic Effect I
- 3 Systemic Effect II
- 4 Transformative Effect I
- 5 Transformative Effect II
- 6 Societal Impact I
- 7 Societal Impact II
- 8 Conclusion: From Law to Justice
- Postscript
- Book part
- Index
7 - Societal Impact II
Demonstration Effect in Affected Communities
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 July 2023
- The Local Impact of the International Criminal Court
- The Local Impact of the International Criminal Court
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 A Framework for Assessing the Impact of the ICC
- 2 Systemic Effect I
- 3 Systemic Effect II
- 4 Transformative Effect I
- 5 Transformative Effect II
- 6 Societal Impact I
- 7 Societal Impact II
- 8 Conclusion: From Law to Justice
- Postscript
- Book part
- Index
Summary
Chapter 7 discusses the societal impact of Court on the affected communities, known as demonstration effect. Different elements are important to “demonstration effect,” including (1) whether the Court is perceived as impartial in a specific context, (2) whether the ICC’s interventions are perceived as relevant and responsive to local communities and their justice struggles, (3) whether the Court is viewed as a legitimate justice institution, and (4) whether it is perceived as independent. Relying on qualitative data, the chapter seeks identify trends in perceptions in Afghanistan, Colombia, Libya, and Uganda. The chapter concludes that the Court suffers from negative perceptions in all four countries. In Uganda and Libya, its failure to prosecute actors from different sides contributes to an impression that it is not impartial. In Afghanistan or Libya, it is perceived as Western-influenced and not independent. In different contexts including Afghanistan, Uganda, and Colombia, it was perceived as an external imposition, and not aligned with local justice priorities arising from many decades of conflict. The architecture of the Court, with limited capacity to conduct preliminary examinations to better contextualize its interventions, limited field offices and little outreach, hinders effectively addressing these negative perceptions.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Local Impact of the International Criminal CourtFrom Law to Justice, pp. 217 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023