Bailey, Guy 1997. When did Southern American English begin? In Schneider, Edgar (ed.) Englishes Around the World 1. Studies in Honour of Manfred Görlach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigham, Doug. 2010. Correlation of the low back vowel merger and trap-retraction. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2): 21–31.Google Scholar

Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. www.praat.org.Google Scholar

Bright, Elizabeth 1967. A word geography of California and Nevada. PhD dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

DeCamp, David 1953. The pronunciation of English in San Francisco. PhD dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

DeCamp, David 1959. The pronunciation of English in San Francisco (Part II). Orbis 8: 54–77.Google Scholar

Di Paolo, Marianna and Faber, Alice 1990. Phonation differences and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English. Language Variation and Change 2: 155–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. n.d. Vowel shifts in Northern California and the Detroit suburbs. www.stanford.edu/~eckert/vowels.html (accessed 12 December 2013).Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope 2008. Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feagin, Crawford 1986. More evidence for vowel change in the South. In Sankoff, David (ed.) Diversity and Diachrony. Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fought, Carmen 1999. A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie 2001. Social factors in the Southern Shift: Gender, age and class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie and Bartlett, Kathryn 2006. The social and linguistic conditioning of back vowel fronting across ethnic groups in Memphis, TN. English Language and Linguistics 10: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie and Kendall, Tyler 2012. Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of U.S. English. Lingua 122(7): 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler. Betsy Evans and Alicia B. Wassink (eds.) in press. Speech in the Western States: The Coastal States (Vol 1). Publication of the American Dialect Society.  Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, Matthew J. 2002. Investigating chain shifts and mergers. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 244–266.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, Lauren 2009. Ethnicity and variation in San Francisco English. PhD dissertation: Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall-Lew, Lauren n.d. ‘I went to school back East … in Berkeley’: San Francisco English and San Francisco identity. Manuscript. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~lhlew/Hall-Lew_underreview_VoxCA.pdf (accessed 12 December 2013).Google Scholar

Harrington, Jonathon 2012. The coarticulatory basis of diachronic high back vowel fronting. In Sole, Maria-José and Recasens, Daniel (eds.) The Initiation of Sound Change: Perception, Production, and Social Factors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Bremmer, Sue, Corcoran, Hazel, Learner, Jean, Luthin, Herb, Moonwomon, Birch and Clay, Mary Van 1987. It's not just Valley Girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irons, Terry 2007. On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19: 137–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, Tyler and Fridland, Valerie 2012. Variation in perception and production of mid front vowels in the U.S. Southern Vowel Shift. Journal of Phonetics 40: 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendall, Tyler and Thomas, Erik 2012. Vowels.R: Vowel manipulation, normalization, and plotting. R package version 1.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vowelsGoogle Scholar

Kerswill, Paul 2013. Koineization. In Chambers, J. K. and Schilling, Natalie (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1980. Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William 1991. The three dialects of English. In Eckert, Penelope (ed.) New Ways of Analyzing Sound Change. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar

Labov, William 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. III: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg, Charles 2006. The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luthin, Herbert 1987. The story of California (ow): The coming-of-age of English in California. In Denning, Keith M., Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye and Rickford, John (eds.) Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual New Ways of Analyzing Variation conference. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, pp. 312–324.Google Scholar

McLarty, Jason, Kendall, Tyler and Farrington, Charlie. In press. Investigating the development of the contemporary Oregonian English vowel system. In Fridland, Valerie, Kendall, Tyler, Evans, Betsy and Wassink, Alicia B. (eds.) Speech in the Western States: The Coastal States (Vol 1). Publication of the American Dialect Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Moonwomon, Birch 1987. Truly awesome: (ɔ) in California English. In Denning, Keith M., Inkelas, Sharon, McNair-Knox, Faye and Rickford, John (eds.) Variation in Language: NWAV-XV at Stanford. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual New Ways of Analyzing Variation conference. Stanford, CA: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, pp. 325–336.Google Scholar

Moonwomon, Birch 1991. Sound change in San Francisco English. Dissertation: University of California, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.) Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives. London: Longman, pp. 237–278.Google Scholar

Nelson, Katherine 2011. A cross-generational acoustic study of the front vowels of native Oregonians. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 40. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert, Calder, Jeremy, Chen, Hsin-Chang, D’Onofrio, Annette, Bayer, Isla Flores, Kim, Seung Kyung, and Van Hofwegen, Janneke 2013. The status of the California Vowel Shift in a non-coastal, non-urban community. Paper presented at The American Dialect Society 2013 Annual Meeting: Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Reed, Carroll E. and Reed, David W. 1972. Problems of English speech mixture in California and Nevada. In Davis, Lawrence M. (ed.) Studies in Linguistics in Honor of Raven I. McDavid. Auburn: University of Alabama Press, pp. 135–143.Google Scholar

Siegel, Jeff 1985. Koines and koineization. Language in Society 14: 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Erik R. 2001. An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Publication of the American Dialect Society 85. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Erik R. 2011. Sociophonetics: An Introduction. New York/Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trudgill, Peter 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter 1998. The chaos before the order: New Zealand English and the second stage of new-dialect formation. In Jahr, Ernst-Håkon (ed.) Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Wassink, Alicia, Squizzero, Robert, Scanlon, Mike, Schirra, Rachel and Conn, Jeff 2009. Effects of style and gender on fronting and raising of /æ/, /e:/ and /ɛ/ before /g/ in Seattle English. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 38. Ottawa, CA.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt and Schilling-Estes, Natalie 2006. American English: Dialects and Variation, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar