de Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.Google Scholar

Liao, H. G. and Zheng, H., Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 67 (2016), 719–747.Google Scholar

Butler, E. P. and Hale, K. F., Chapter 6 in Dynamic Experiments in the Electron Microscope (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1981).Google Scholar

Parsons, D. F., Structure of wet specimens in electron microscopy. Science, 186 (1974), 407–414.Google Scholar

Ruska, E., Beitrag zur uebermikroskopischen Abbildungen bei hoeheren Drucken. Kolloid Z., 100 (1942), 212–219.Google Scholar

Helveg, S., López-Cartes, C., Sehested, J. et al., Atomic-scale imaging of carbon nanofibre growth. Nature, 427 (2004), 426–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Parsons, D. F., Matricardi, V. R., Moretz, R. C. and Turner, J. N., Electron microscopy and diffraction of wet unstained and unfixed biological objects. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys., 15 (1974), 161–270.Google Scholar

Huang, J. Y., Zhong, L., Wang, C. M. et al., In situ observation of the electrochemical lithiation of a single SnO₂ nanowire electrode. Science, 330 (2010), 1515–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wang, C. M., Xu, W., Liu, J. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy and spectroscopy studies of interfaces in Li ion batteries: challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Res., 25 (2010), 1541–1547.Google Scholar

Wang, C.-M., Liao, H.-G. and Ross, F. M., Observation of materials processes in liquids by electron microscopy, MRS Bulletin, 40 (2015), 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, I. M. and McBain, J. W., A closed cell for electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys., 15 (1944), 607–609.Google Scholar

Heide, H. G., Elektronenmikroskopie von Objekten unter Atmosphaerendruck oder unter Drucken, welche Austricknen verhindern. Naturwissenschaften, 47 (1960), 313–317.Google Scholar

Heide, H. G., Electron microscopic observation of specimens under controlled gas pressure. J. Cell Biol., 13 (1962), 147–152.Google Scholar

Double, D. D., Some studies of the hydration of Portland cement using high voltage (1MV) electron microscopy. Mater. Sci. Eng., 12 (1973), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daulton, T. L., Little, B. J., Lowe, K. and Jones-Meehan, J., In situ environmental cell–transmission electron microscopy study of microbial reduction of chromium(VI) using electron energy loss spectroscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 7 (2001), 470–485.Google Scholar

Chiou, W.-A. et al., In situ TEM study of DNA/gold nanoparticles in liquid environment. Microsc. Microanal., 5 (Suppl. 2) (1999), MSA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukami, A., Fukushima, K. and Kohyama, N., Observation technique for wet clay minerals using film-sealed environmental cell equipment attached to high-resolution electron microscope. In Bennett, R. et al., eds., Microstructure of Fine-Grained Sediments (New York: Springer, 1991) pp. 321–331.Google Scholar

Gai, P. L., Development of wet environment TEM (wet-ETEM) for in situ studies of liquid-catalyst reactions on the nanoscale. Microsc Microanal., 8 (2002), 21–28.Google Scholar

Sugi, H. T., Akimoto, K., Sutoh, S. et al., Dynamic electron microscopy of ATP-induced myosin head movement in living muscle filaments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94 (1997), 4378–4392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, K. A. and Glaeser, R. M., Electron microscopy of frozen hydrated biological specimens. J. Ultrastruct. Res., 55 (1976), 448–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frank, J., Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies: Visualization of Biological Molecules in Their Native State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Lucic, V., Foerster, F. and Baumeister, W., Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 74 (2005), 833–865.Google Scholar

Stahlberg, H. and Walz, T., Molecular electron microscopy: state of the art and current challenges. ACS Chem. Biol., 3 (2008), 268–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid-liquid interface. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.Google Scholar

Franks, R., Morefield, S., Wen, J. et al., A study of nanomaterial dispersion in solution by wet-cell transmission electron microscopy. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 8 (2008), 4404–4407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, K.-L., Wu, C.-C., Huang, Y.-J. et al., Novel microchip for in situ TEM imaging of living organisms and bio-reactions in aqueous conditions. Lab Chip, 8 (2008), 1915–1921.Google Scholar

Zheng, H. M., Claridge, S. A., Minor, A. M., Alivisatos, A. P. and Dahmen, U., Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2460–2465.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. M. and Bau, H. H., The Nanoaquarium: a platform for in situ transmission electron microscopy in liquid media. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 19 (2010), 885–894.Google Scholar

Leenheer, A. J., Sullivan, J. P., Shaw, M. J. and Harris, C. T., A sealed liquid cell for in situ transmission electron microscopy of controlled electrochemical processes. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 24 (2015), 1061–1068.Google Scholar

Tanase, M., Winterstein, J., Sharma, R. et al., High-resolution imaging and spectroscopy at high pressure: a novel liquid cell for the TEM. Microsc. Micranal., 21 (2015), 1629–1638.Google Scholar

Mueller, C., Harb, M., Dwyer, J. R. and Miller, R. J. Dwayne, Nanofluidic cells with controlled pathlength and liquid flow for rapid, high-resolution in situ imaging with electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 4 (2013), 2339–2347.Google Scholar

den Heijer, M., Shao, I., Radisic, A., Reuter, M. C. and Ross, F. M., Patterned electrochemical deposition of copper using an electron beam. APL Materials, 2 (2014), 022101.Google Scholar

Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P. et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.Google Scholar

Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.Google Scholar

Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E., Aguiar, J., Arslan, I. and Browning, N. D., Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 621–627.Google Scholar

Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.Google Scholar

Zaluzec, N. J., Burke, M. G., Haigh, S. J. and Kulzick, M. A., X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry during in situ liquid cell studies using an analytical electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 323–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewis, E. A., Haigh, S. J., Slater, T. J. A. et al., Real-time imaging and local elemental analysis of nanostructures in liquids. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 10019–10022.Google Scholar

Kuwabata, S., Kongkanand, A., Oyamatsu, D. and Torimoto, T., Observation of ionic liquid by scanning electron microscope. Chem. Lett., 35 (2006), 600–601.Google Scholar

Arimoto, S., Sugimura, M., Kageyama, H., Torimoto, T. and Kuwabata, S., Development of new techniques for scanning electron microscope observation using ionic liquid. Electrochim. Acta, 53 (2008), 6228–6234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swift, J. A. and Brown, A. C., An environmental cell for the examination of wet biological specimens at atmospheric pressure by transmission scanning electron microscopy. J. Phys. E, 3 (1970), 924–926.Google Scholar

Danilatos, G. D., Review and outline of environmental SEM at present. J. Microsc., 162 (1991), 391–402.Google Scholar

Moncrieff, D. A., Barker, P. R. and Robinson, V. N. E., Electron scattering by gas in the scanning electron microscope. J. Phys. D, 12 (1979), 481–488.Google Scholar

Stokes, D. J., Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-ESEM) (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).Google Scholar

Bogner, A., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Jouneau, P. H. and Gauthier, C., Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase. Ultramicroscopy, 104 (2005), 290–301.Google Scholar

Bogner, A., Jouneau, P.-H., Thollet, G., Basset, D. and Gauthier, C., A history of scanning electron microscopy developments: towards “wet-STEM” imaging. Micron, 38 (2007), 390–401.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B., Baudoin, J. P., Eder, M., Werner, U. and de Jonge, N., Epidermal growth factor receptor subunit locations determined in hydrated cells with environmental scanning electron microscopy. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 2621–2626.Google Scholar

Masenelli-Varlot, K., Malchere, A., Ferreira, J. et al., Wet-STEM tomography: principles, potentialities and limitations. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 366–375.Google Scholar

Novotny, F., Wandrol, P., Proska, J. and Slouf, M., In situ wetSTEM observation of gold nanorod self-assembly dynamics in a drying colloidal droplet. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jansson, A., Nafari, A., Sanz-Velasco, A. et al., Novel method for controlled wetting of materials in the environmental scanning electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jansson, A., Boissier, C., Marucci, M. et al., Novel method for visualizing water transport through phase-separated polymer films. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 394–406.Google Scholar

Barkay, Z., Wettability study using transmitted electrons in environmental scanning electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett., 96 (2010), 183109.Google Scholar

Barkay, Z., In situ imaging of nano-droplet condensation and coalescence on thin water films. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 317–322.Google Scholar

Thiberge, S., Nechushtan, A., Sprinzak, D. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 3346–3351.Google Scholar

Hell, S. W., Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science, 316 (2007), 1153–1158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, E., Kobler, C., Jensen, P. S. and Molhave, K.. In-situ SEM microchip setup for electrochemical experiments with water based solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 129 (2013), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kraus, J., Reichelt, R., Günther, S. et al., Photoelectron spectroscopy of wet and gaseous samples through graphene membranes. Nanoscale, 6 (2014), 14394–14403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yang, W., Zhang, Y., Hilke, M. and Reisner, W., Dynamic imaging of Au-nanoparticles via scanning electron microscopy in a graphene wet cell. Nanotechnology, 26 (2015), 315703.Google Scholar

Yang, L., Yu, X.-Y., Zhu, Z., Thevuthasan, T. and Cowin, J. P., Making a hybrid microfluidic platform compatible for in situ imaging by vacuum-based techniques. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 29 (2011), 061101.Google Scholar

Wojcik, M., Hauser, M., Li, W., Moon, S. and Xu, K., Graphene-enabled electron microscopy and correlated super-resolution microscopy of wet cells. Nat. Commun., 6 (2015), 7384.Google Scholar

Liv, N., Zonnevylle, A. C., Narvaez, A. C. et al., Simultaneous correlative scanning electron and high-NA fluorescence microscopy. PLOS One, 8 (2013), e55707.Google Scholar

Liv, N., Lazić, I., Kruit, P. and Hoogenboom, J. P., Scanning electron microscopy of individual nanoparticle bio-markers in liquid. Ultramicroscopy, 143 (2014), 93–99.Google Scholar

Nishiyama, H., Suga, M., Ogura, T. et al., Atmospheric scanning electron microscope observes cells and tissues in open medium through silicon nitride film. J. Struct. Biol., 169 (2010), 438–449.Google Scholar

Nawa, Y., Inami, W., Chiba, A. et al., Dynamic and high-resolution live cell imaging by direct electron beam excitation. Opt. Express, 20 (2012), 5629–5635.Google Scholar

Vidavsky, N., Addadi, S., Mahamid, J. et al., Initial stages of calcium uptake and mineral deposition in sea urchin embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111 (2014), 39–44.Google Scholar

Creemer, J. F., Helveg, S., Hoveling, G. H. et al., Atomic-scale electron microscopy at ambient pressure. Ultramicroscopy, 108 (2008), 993–998.Google Scholar

Jensen, E. and Molhave, K., Monolithic chip system with a microfluidic channel for in situ electron microscopy of liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 445–451.Google Scholar

Radisic, A., Vereecken, P. M., Hannon, J. B., Searson, P. C. and Ross, F. M., Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth of nanoscale clusters using real-time kinetic data. Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 238–242.Google Scholar

Verch, A., Pfaff, M. and De Jonge, N., Exceptionally slow movement of gold nanoparticles at a solid:liquid interface investigated by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 31 (2015), 6956–6964.Google Scholar

Krueger, M., Berg, S., Stone, D. A. et al., Drop-casted self-assembling graphene oxide membranes for scanning electron microscopy on wet and dense gaseous samples. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 10047–10054.Google Scholar

Schneider, N. M., Norton, M. M., Mendel, B. J. et al., Electron–water interactions and implications for liquid cell electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014), 22373–22382.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zheng, H. M., Smith, R. K., Jun, Y. W. et al., Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324 (2009), 1309–1312.Google Scholar

van de Put, M. W., Carcouet, C. C., Bomans, P. H. et al., Writing silica structures in liquid with scanning transmission electron microscopy. Small, 11 (2015), 585–590.Google Scholar

Sutter, E., Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S. et al., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of silver-palladium galvanic replacement reactions on silver nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), 4946.Google Scholar

Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.Google Scholar

Mehdi, B. L., Gu, M., Parent, L. R. et al., In situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy for battery research. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 484–492.Google Scholar

Radisic, A., Ross, F. M. and Searson, P. C., In situ study of the growth kinetics of individual islands during electrodeposition of copper. J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006), 7862–7868.Google Scholar

Radisic, A., Vereecken, P. M., Searson, P. C. and Ross, F. M., The morphology and nucleation kinetics of copper islands during electrodeposition. Surf. Sci., 600 (2006), 1817–1826.Google Scholar

Schneider, N. M., Park, J. H. and Grogan, J. M., Visualization of active and passive control of morphology during electrodeposition. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1530–1531.Google Scholar

White, E. R., Singer, S. B., Augustyn, V. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy of lead dendrites and lead ions in aqueous solution. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 6308–6317.Google Scholar

Sun, M., Liao, H.-G., Niu, K. and Zheng, H., Structural and morphological evolution of lead dendrites during electrochemical migration. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 2227.Google Scholar

Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Liao, H.-G. et al., Visualization of electrode-electrolyte interfaces in LiPF₆/EC/DEC electrolyte for lithium ion batteries via in-situ TEM. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1745–1750.Google Scholar

Mehdi, B. L., Qian, J., Nasybulin, E. et al., Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2168–2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sacci, R. L., Black, J. M., Balke, N. et al., Nanoscale imaging of fundamental Li battery chemistry: solid-electrolyte interphase formation and preferential growth of lithium metal nanoclusters. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2011–2018.Google Scholar

Leenheer, A. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Zavadil, K. R., Sullivan, J. P. and Harris, C. T., Lithium electrodeposition dynamics in aprotic electrolyte observed in situ via transmission electron microscopy, ACS Nano, 9 (2015), 4379–4389.Google Scholar

Gu, M., Parent, L. R., Mehdi, L. et al., Demonstration of an electrochemical liquid cell for operando transmission electron microscopy observation of the lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si nanowire battery anodes. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 6106–6112.Google Scholar

Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. et al., Direct visualization of initial SEI morphology and growth kinetics during lithium deposition by in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Chemical Commun., 50 (2013), 2104–2107.Google Scholar

Wu, F. and Yao, N., Advances in sealed liquid cells for in-situ TEM electrochemical investigation of lithium-ion battery. Nano Energy, 11 (2015), 196–210.Google Scholar

Abellan Baeza, P., Mehdi, B. L., Parent, L. R. et al., Probing the degradation mechanisms in electrolyte solutions for Li-ion batteries by in-situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1293–1299.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W.. Duquette, D., Ross, F. M. and Hull, R., Metastable structures in Al thin films prior to the onset of corrosion pitting as observed using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 462–468.Google Scholar

Chee, S. W., Pratt, S. H., Hattar, K. et al., Studying localized corrosion using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 168–171.Google Scholar

Zhong, X., Burke, M. G., Schilling, S., Haigh, S. J. and Zaluzec, N. J., Novel hybrid sample preparation method for in situ liquid cell TEM analysis. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (S3) (2014), 1514–1515.Google Scholar

Woehl, T. J., Evans, J. E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W. D. and Browning, N. D., Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 8599–8610.Google Scholar

Liao, H. G., Cui, L. K., Whitelam, S. and Zheng, H. M., Real-time imaging of Pt₃Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science, 336 (2012), 1011–1014.Google Scholar

Jungjohann, K. L., Bliznakov, S., Sutter, P. W., Stach, E. A. and Sutter, E. A., In situ liquid cell electron microscopy of the solution growth of Au–Pd core–shell nanostructures. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 2964–2970.Google Scholar

De Clercq, A., Dachraoui, W., Margeat, O. et al., Growth of Pt−Pd nanoparticles studied in situ by HRTEM in a liquid cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5 (2014), 2126–2130.Google Scholar

Parent, L. R., Robinson, D. R., Woehl, T. J. et al., Direct in situ observation of nanoparticle synthesis in a liquid crystal surfactant template. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 3589–3596.Google Scholar

Zhu, G., Jiang, Y., Lin, F. et al., In situ study of the growth of two-dimensional palladium dendritic nanostructures using liquid-cell electron microscopy. Chem Commun., 50 (2014), 9447–9450.Google Scholar

Kraus, T. and de Jonge, N., Dendritic gold nanowire growth observed in liquid with transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 8427–8432.Google Scholar

Jiang, Y., Zhu, G., Lin, F. et al., In situ study of oxidative etching of palladium nanocrystals by liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 3761–3765.Google Scholar

Wu, J., Gao, W., Yang, H. and Zuo, J.-M., Imaging shape-dependent corrosion behavior of Pt nanoparticles over extended time using a liquid flow cell and TEM. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (S3) (2014), 1508–1509.Google Scholar

Park, J. H., Schneider, N. M., Grogan, J. M. et al., Control of electron beam-induced Au nanocrystal growth kinetics through solution chemistry. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 5314–5320.Google Scholar

Noh, K. W., Liu, Y., Sun, L. and Dillon, S. J., Challenges associated with in-situ TEM in environmental systems: the case of silver in aqueous solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 116 (2012), 34–38.Google Scholar

Liao, H.-G. and Zheng, H., Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy study of platinum iron nanocrystal growth and shape evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135 (2013), 5038–5043.Google Scholar

Liao, H. G., Zherebetskyy, D., Xin, H. et al., Facet development during platinum nanocube growth. Science, 345 (2014), 916–919.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Tai, K. and Dillon, S. J., Growth kinetics and morphological evolution of ZnO precipitated from solution. Chem. Mater., 25 (2013), 2927–2933.Google Scholar

Kimura, Y., Niinomi, H., Tsukamoto, K. and García-Ruiz, J. M., In situ live observation of nucleation and dissolution of sodium chlorate nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136 (2014), 1762–1765.Google Scholar

Xin, H. L. and Zheng, H., In Situ observation of oscillatory growth of bismuth nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 1470–1474.Google Scholar

Niu, K.-Y., Park, J., Zheng, H. and Alivisatos, A.P., Revealing bismuth oxide hollow nanoparticle formation by the Kirkendall effect. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 5715–5719.Google Scholar

Evans, J. E., Jungjohann, K. L., Browning, N. D. and Arslan, I., Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2809–2813.Google Scholar

Donev, E. U. and Hastings, J. T., Electron-beam-induced deposition of platinum from a liquid precursor. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2715–2718.Google Scholar

Zheng, H. M., Mirsaidov, U. M., Wang, L. W. and Matsudaira, P., Electron beam manipulation of nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 5644–5648.Google Scholar

Li, D. S., Nielsen, M. H., Lee, J. R. I. et al., Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachment. Science, 336 (2012), 1014–1018.Google Scholar

Woehl, T. J., Park, C., Evans, J. E. et al., Direct observation of aggregative nanoparticle growth: kinetic modeling of the size distribution and growth rate. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 373–378.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. M., Rotkina, L. and Bau, H. H., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of colloid aggregation and growth dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 83 (2011), 061405.Google Scholar

Park, J., Zheng, H., Lee, W. C. et al., Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 2078–2085.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Lin, X.-M., Sun, Y. and Rajh, T., In situ visualization of self-assembly of charged gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135 (2013), 3764–3767.Google Scholar

White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Singer, S. B., Aloni, S. and Regan, B. C., Imaging nanobubbles in water with scanning transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Express, 4 (2011), 055201.Google Scholar

Tai, K., Liu, Y. and Dillon, S. J., In situ cryogenic transmission electron microscopy for characterizing the evolution of solidifying water ice in colloidal systems. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 330–337.Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, D., Bosman, M., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Leong, F. Y. and Mirsaidov, U., Nucleation dynamics of water nanodroplets. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 407–415.Google Scholar

Ruan, C.-Y., Lobastov, V. A., Vigliotti, F., Chen, S. and Zewail, A. H., Ultrafast electron crystallography of interfacial water. Science, 304 (2004), 80–84.Google Scholar

Mirsaidov, U., Ohl, C.-D. and Matsudaira, P., A direct observation of nanometer-size void dynamics in an ultra-thin water film. Soft Matter, 8 (2012), 7108–7111.Google Scholar

Mirsaidov, U. M., Zheng, H., Bhattacharya, D., Casana, Y. and Matsudaira, P., Direct observation of stick-slip movements of water nanodroplets induced by an electron beam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109 (2012), 7187–7190.Google Scholar

Norton, M., Park, J. H., Kodambaka, S., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H., Dynamics of sub-micron bubbles growing in a wedge in the low capillary number regime. Bull. Ameri. Phys. Soc., 59 (2014); and Bau, H., Grogan, J. M., Norton, M. and Ross, F. M., On the surface tension of nanobubbles. APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting (2013).Google Scholar

Mattia, D. and Gogotsi, Y., Review: static and dynamic behavior of liquids inside carbon nanotubes. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 5 (2008), 289–305.Google Scholar

Mirsaidov, U., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Bhattacharya, D. et al., Scrolling graphene into nanofluidic channels. Lab Chip, 13 (2013), 2874–2878.Google Scholar

Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Video-frequency scanning transmission electron microscopy of moving gold nanoparticles in liquid. Micron, 43 (2012), 1078–1084.Google Scholar

White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Shevitski, B., Singer, S. B. and Regan, B. C., Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 3695–3698.Google Scholar

Lu, J. Y., Aabdin, Z., Loh, N. D., Bhattacharya, D. and Mirsaidov, U., Nanoparticle dynamics in a nanodroplet. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 2111–2115.Google Scholar

Chen, Q., Smith, J. M., Park, J. et al., 3D motion of DNA-Au nanoconjugates in graphene liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 4556–4561.Google Scholar

Cazade, P.-A., Hartkamp, R. and Coasne, B., Structure and dynamics of an electrolyte confined in charged nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014), 5061–5072.Google Scholar

Kim, H. I., Kushmerick, J. G., Houston, J. E. and Bunker, B. C., Viscous “interphase” water adjacent to oligo(ethylene glycol)-terminated monolayers. Langmuir, 19 (2003), 9271–9275.Google Scholar

Kashyap, S., Woehl, T. J., Liu, X., Mallapragada, S. K. and Prozorov, T., Nucleation of iron oxide nanoparticles mediated by Mms6 protein in situ, ACS Nano, 8 (2014), 9097–9106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nielsen, M. H., Lee, J. R. I., Hu, Q. N., Han, T. Y. J., and De Yoreo, J. J., Structural evolution, formation pathways and energetic controls during template-directed nucleation of CaCO₃. Faraday Discuss., 159 (2012), 105–121.Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. H., Aloni, S. and De Yoreo, J. J., In situ TEM imaging of CaCO₃ nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways. Science, 345 (2014), 1158–1162.Google Scholar

Smeets, P. J. M., Cho, K. R., Kempen, R. G. E., Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. and De Yoreo, J. J., In situ TEM shows ion binding is key to directing CaCO₃ nucleation in a biomimetic matrix. Nat. Mater., 14 (2015), 394–399.Google Scholar

Woehl, T. J., Kashyap, S., Firlar, E. et al., Correlative electron and fluorescence microscopy of magnetotactic bacteria in liquid: toward in vivo imaging. Sci. Rep., 4 (2014), 6854.Google Scholar

de Jonge, N., Peckys, D. B., Kremers, G. J. and Piston, D. W., Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106 (2009), 2159–2164.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B., Korf, U. and de Jonge, N., Local variations of HER2 dimerization in breast cancer cells discovered by correlative fluorescence and liquid electron microscopy. Sci. Adv., 1 (2015), e1500165.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Visualization of gold nanoparticle uptake in living cells with liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 1733–1738.Google Scholar

Dukes, M. J., Peckys, D. and de Jonge, N., Correlative fluorescence- and scanning transmission electron microscopy of quantum dot labeled proteins on whole cells in liquid. ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 4110–4116.Google Scholar

Pohlmann, E. S., Patel, K., Guo, S. et al., Real-time visualization of nanoparticles interacting with glioblastoma stem cells. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2329–2335.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B., Baudoin, J.-P., Eder, M., Werner, U. and de Jonge, N., Epidermal growth factor receptor subunit locations determined in hydrated cells with environmental scanning electron microscopy. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 2626.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B., Mazur, P., Gould, K. L. and de Jonge, N., Fully hydrated yeast cells imaged with electron microscopy. Biophys. J., 100 (2011), 2522–2529.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy: imaging protein complexes in their native environment in whole eukaryotic cells. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 189–198.Google Scholar

Glaeser, R., Comment on electron microscopy of biological specimens in liquid water. Biophys. J., 103 (2012), 163–164.Google Scholar

Kirk, S. E., Skepper, J. N. and Donald, A. M., Application of environmental scanning electron microscopy to determine biological surface structure. J. Microsc., 233 (2009), 205–224.Google Scholar

Sugi, H., Minoda, H., Inayoshi, Y. et al., Direct demonstration of the cross-bridge recovery stroke in muscle thick filaments in aqueous solution by using the hydration chamber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105 (2008), 17396–17401.Google Scholar

Sugi, H., Chaen, S., Akimoto, T. et al., Electron microscopic recording of myosin head power stroke in hydrated myosin filaments. Sci. Rep., 5 (2015), 15700.Google Scholar

Mohanty, N., Fahrenholtz, M., Nagaraja, A., Boyle, D. and Berry, V., Impermeable graphenic encasement of bacteria. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 1270–1275.Google Scholar

Park, J., Park, H., Ercius, P. et al., Direct observation of wet biological samples by graphene liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 4737–4744.Google Scholar

Dukes, M. J., Thomas, R., Damiano, J. et al., Improved microchip design and application for in situ transmission electron microscopy of macromolecules. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 338–345.Google Scholar

Degen, K., Dukes, M., Tanner, J. R. and Kelly, D. F., The development of affinity capture devices: a nanoscale purification platform for biological in situ transmission electron microscopy. RSC Adv., 2 (2012), 2408–2412.Google Scholar

Gilmore, B. L., Showalter, S. P., Dukes, M. J. et al., Visualizing viral assemblies in a nanoscale biosphere. Lab Chip, 13 (2013), 216–219.Google Scholar

Wang, C., Qiao, Q., Shokuhfar, T. and Klie, R. F., High-resolution electron microscopy and spectroscopy of ferritin in biocompatible graphene liquid cells and graphene sandwiches. Adv. Mater., 26 (2014), 3410–3414.Google Scholar

Hoppe, S. M., Sasaki, D. Y., Kinghorn, A. N. and Hattar, K., In-situ transmission electron microscopy of liposomes in an aqueous environment. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 9958–9961.Google Scholar

Proetto, M. T., Rush, A. M., Chien, M.-P. et al., Dynamics of soft nanomaterials captured by transmission electron microscopy in liquid water. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136 (2014), 1162–1165.Google Scholar

Plamper, F. A., Gelissen, A. P., Timper, J. et al., Spontaneous assembly of miktoarm stars into vesicular interpolyelectrolyte complexes. Macromol. Rapid Commun., 34 (2013), 855–860.Google Scholar

Mirsaidov, U. M., Zheng, H., Casana, Y. and Matsudaira, P., Imaging protein structure in water at 2.7 nm resolution by transmission electron microscopy. Biophys. J., 102 (2012), L15–17.Google Scholar

Varano, A. C., Rahimi, A., Dukes, M. J. et al., Visualizing virus particle mobility in liquid at the nanoscale, Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 16176–16179.Google Scholar

Maraloiu, V. A., Hamoudeh, M., Fessi, H. and Blanchin, M. G., Study of magnetic nanovectors by Wet-STEM, a new ESEM mode in transmission. J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 352 (2010), 386–392.Google Scholar

Adachi, K., Freney, E. J., Buseck, P. R., Shapes of internally mixed hygroscopic aerosol particles after deliquescence, and their effect on light scattering. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38 (2011), L13804.Google Scholar

de Gennes, P. G., Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 57 (1985), 827–863.Google Scholar

Liu, J., Wei, B., Sloppy, J. D. et al., Direct imaging of electrochemical deposition of poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) (PEDOT) by transmission electron microscopy. Macro Lett., 4 (2015), 897–900.Google Scholar

Sadki, S., Schottland, P., Brodie, N. and Sabouraud, G., The mechanisms of pyrrole electropolymerization. Chem. Soc. Rev., 29 (2000), 283–293.Google Scholar

Ross, F. M., Controlling nanowire structures through real time growth studies. Rep. Prog. Phys., 73 (2010), 114501–114522.Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Miller, B. K. and Crozier, P. A., Atomic level observation of surface amorphization in anatase nanocrystals during light irradiation in water vapor. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 679–684.Google Scholar

Zhu, G.-Z., Prabhudev, S., Yang, J. et al., In situ liquid cell TEM study of morphological evolution and degradation of Pt–Fe nanocatalysts during potential cycling. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014), 22111–22119.Google Scholar

Browning, N. D., Bonds, M. A., Campbell, G. H. et al., Recent developments in dynamic transmission electron microscopy. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 16 (2012), 23–30.Google Scholar

Mourik, M. W., van Engelen, W. J., Vredenbregt, E. J. D. and Luiten, O. J., Ultrafast electron diffraction using an ultracold source. Struct. Dynam., 1 (2014), 034302.Google Scholar

de Jonge, N., System and methods for live cell transmission electron microscopy. US Patent Application 13,299,241 (2011).Google Scholar

Danev, R. and Nagayama, K., Transmission electron microscopy with Zernike phase plate. Ultramicroscopy, 88 (2001), 243–252.Google Scholar

Simon, P., Lichte, H., Formanek, P. et al., Electron holography of biological samples. Micron, 39 (2008), 229–256.Google Scholar

Jensen, E., Købler, C., Jensen, P. S. and Mølhave, K., In-situ SEM microchip setup for electrochemical experiments with water based solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 129 (2013), 63–69.Google Scholar

Abrams, I. M. and McBain, J. W., A closed cell for electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys., 100 (1944), 607–609.Google Scholar

Double, D. D., Some studies of the hydration of Portland cement using high voltage (1 MV) electron microscopy. Mater. Sci. Eng., 12 (1973), 29–34.Google Scholar

Smith, D. J., Characterisation of nanomaterials using transmission electron microscopy. In Hutchison, J. and Kirkland, A., eds., Nanocharacterisation (London: Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007) pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Danilatos, G. D., Foundations of environmental scanning electron microscopy. Adv. Electron. Electron Phys., 71 (1988), 109–250.Google Scholar

Gai, P. L., Sharma, R. and Ross, F. M., Environmental (S)TEM studies of gas-liquid-solid interactions under reaction conditions. MRS Bull., 33 (2008), 107–114.Google Scholar

Wang, C. M., Liao, H. G. and Ross, F. M., Observation of materials processes in liquids by electron microscopy. MRS Bull., 40 (2015), 46–52.Google Scholar

Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid-liquid interface. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.Google Scholar

Radisic, A., Vereecken, P. M., Hannon, J. B., Searson, P. C. and Ross, F. M., Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth of nanoscale clusters using real-time kinetic data. Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 238–242.Google Scholar

Franks, R., Morefield, S., Wen, J. et al., A study of nanomaterial dispersion in solution by wet-cell transmission electron microscopy. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 8 (2008), 4404–4407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Liu, K.-L., Wu, C.-C., Huang, Y.-J. et al., Novel microchip for in situ TEM imaging of living organisms and bio-reactions in aqueous conditions. Lab Chip, 8 (2008), 1915–1921.Google Scholar

Zheng, H., Claridge, S. A., Minor, A. M., Alivisatos, A. P. and Dahmen, U., Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2460–2465.Google Scholar

de Jonge, N., Peckys, D. B., Kremers, G. J. and Piston, D. W., Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106 (2009), 2159–2164.Google Scholar

De Jonge, N., Poirier-Demers, N., Demers, H., Peckys, D. B. and Drouin, D., Nanometer-resolution electron microscopy through micrometers-thick water layers. Ultramicroscopy, 110 (2010), 1114–1119.Google Scholar

Peckys, D. B., Veith, G. M., Joy, D. C. and de Jonge, N., Nanoscale imaging of whole cells using a liquid enclosure and a scanning transmission electron microscope. PLoS One, 4 (2009), e8214.Google Scholar

Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E., Aguiar, J. A., Arslan, I. and Browning, N. D., Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 621–627.Google Scholar

Liao, H.-G., Zherebetskyy, D., Xin, H. et al., Facet development during platinum nanocube growth. Science, 345 (2014), 916–919.Google Scholar

Li, D., Nielsen, M. H., Lee, J. R. I. et al., Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachment. Science, 336 (2012), 1014–1018.Google Scholar

Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.Google Scholar

Ross, F. M. and de Jonge, N., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., The Nanoaquarium: a new paradigm in electron microscopy. J. Indian Inst. Sci., 92 (2012), 295–308.Google Scholar

Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P. et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.Google Scholar

Yuk, J. M., Seo, H. K., Choi, J. W. and Lee, J. Y., Anisotropic lithiation onset in silicon nanoparticle anode revealed by in situ graphene liquid cell electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 8 (2014), 7478–7485.Google Scholar

Wang, C., Qiao, Q., Klie, R. F. and Shokuhfar, T., High resolution in-situ study of reactions in graphene liquid cells. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1520–1521.Google Scholar

De Clercq, A., Dachraoui, W., Margeat, O. et al., Growth of Pt–Pd nanoparticles studied in situ by HRTEM in a liquid cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5 (2014), 2126–2130.Google Scholar

Zheng, H., Smith, R. K., Jun, Y.-W. et al., Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324 (2009), 1309–1312.Google Scholar

Thiberge, S., Nechushtan, A., Sprinzak, D. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 3346–3351.Google Scholar

Thiberge, S., Zik, O. and Moses, E., An apparatus for imaging liquids, cells, and other wet samples in the scanning electron microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (2004), 2280–2289.Google Scholar

Williamson, M. J., Investigations of materials issues in advanced interconnect structures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Virginia (2002).Google Scholar

Radisic, A., Electrochemical nucleation and growth of copper, Ph.D. Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University (2005).Google Scholar

den Heijer, M., In-situ transmission electron microscopy of electrodeposition: technical development, beam effects and lithography, M.Sc. Thesis, Leiden University (2008).Google Scholar

Creemer, J. F., Helveg, S., Hoveling, G. H. et al., Atomic-scale electron microscopy at ambient pressure. Ultramicroscopy, 108 (2008), 993–998.Google Scholar

Creemer, J. F., Helveg, S., Kooyman, P. J. et al., A MEMS reactor for atomic-scale microscopy of nanomaterials under industrially relevant conditions. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 19 (2010), 254–264.Google Scholar

Leenheer, A. J., Sullivan, J. P., Shaw, M. J. and Harris, C. T., A sealed liquid cell for in situ transmission electron microscopy of controlled electrochemical processes. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 24 (2015), 1061–1068.Google Scholar

Huang, T.-W., Liu, S.-Y., Chuang, Y.-J. et al., Self-aligned wet-cell for hydrated microbiology observation in TEM. Lab Chip, 12 (2012), 340–347.Google Scholar

Jensen, E., Burrows, A. and Mølhave, K., Monolithic chip system with a microfluidic channel for in situ electron microscopy of liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 445–451.Google Scholar

Daulton, T. L., Little, B. J., Lowe, K. and Jones-Meehan, J., In situ environmental cell–transmission electron microscopy study of microbial reduction of chromium(VI) using electron energy loss spectroscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 7 (2001), 470–485.Google Scholar

Daulton, T. L., Little, B. J., Lowe, K. and Jones-Meehan, J., Electron energy loss spectroscopy techniques for the study of microbial chromium(VI) reduction. J. Microbiol. Methods, 50 (2002), 39–54.Google Scholar

Krueger, M., Berg, S., Stone, D. et al., Drop-casted self-assembling graphene oxide membranes for scanning electron microscopy on wet and dense gaseous samples. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 10047–10054.Google Scholar

Gao, Y. and Bando, Y., Nanotechnology: carbon nanothermometer containing gallium. Nature, 415 (2002), 599.Google Scholar

Yarin, A. L., Yazicioglu, A. G., Megaridis, C. M., Rossi, M. P. and Gogotsi, Y., Theoretical and experimental investigation of aqueous liquids contained in carbon nanotubes. J. Appl. Phys., 97 (2005), 124309.Google Scholar

Yang, J. and Paul, O., Fracture properties of LPCVD silicon nitride thin films from the load-deflection of long membranes. Sens. Actuators A Phys., 97–98 (2002), 520–526.Google Scholar

Abellan, P., Woehl, T. J., Tonkyn, R. G. et al., Implementing in situ experiments in liquids in the (scanning) transmission electron microscope ((S)TEM) and dynamic TEM (DTEM). Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1648–1649.Google Scholar

Klein, K. L. and Anderson, I. M., Current challenges of TEM imaging with a liquid flow cell. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1154–1155.Google Scholar

Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruña, H. D. and Muller, D. A., In situ electron energy-loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 1027–1035.Google Scholar

Regan, B. C., Mecklenburg, M., White, E. R., Singer, S. B. and Aloni, S., Imaging nanobubbles in water with scanning transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Express, 4 (2011), 055201.Google Scholar

Yang, J., Gaspar, J. and Paul, O., Fracture properties of LPCVD silicon nitride and thermally grown silicon oxide thin films from the load-deflection of long Si₃N₄ and SiO₂/Si₃N₄ diaphragms. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 17 (2008), 1120–1134.Google Scholar

Mueller, C., Harb, M., Dwyer, J. R. and Miller, R. J. D., Nanofluidic cells with controlled pathlength and liquid flow for rapid, high-resolution in situ imaging with electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 4 (2013), 2339–2347.Google Scholar

Tanase, M., Winterstein, J., Sharma, R. et al., High-resolution imaging and spectroscopy at high pressure: a novel liquid cell for the TEM. Microsc. Micranal., 21 (2015), 1629–1638.Google Scholar

Nielsen, M. H., Aloni, S. and De Yoreo, J. J., In situ TEM imaging of CaCO₃ nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways. Science, 345 (2014), 1158–1162.Google Scholar

Xin, H. L. and Zheng, H., In situ observation of oscillatory growth of bismuth nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 1470.Google Scholar

Xin, H. L., Niu, K., Alsem, D. H. and Zheng, H., In-situ TEM study of catalytic nanoparticle reactions in atmospheric pressure gas environment, Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 1558–1568.Google Scholar

Goode, A. E., Porter, A. E., Ryan, M. P. and McComb, D. W., Correlative electron and X-ray microscopy: probing chemistry and bonding with high spatial resolution. Nanoscale, 7 (2015), 1534–1548.Google Scholar

Egerton, R. F., Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the TEM. Rep. Prog. Phys., 72 (2009), 016502.Google Scholar

Lewis, E. A., Haigh, S. J., Slater, T. J. A. et al., Real-time imaging and local elemental analysis of nanostructures in liquids. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 10019–10022.Google Scholar

Zaluzec, N. J., Burke, M. G., Haigh, S. J. and Kulzick, M. A., X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry during in situ liquid cell studies using an analytical electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 323–329.Google Scholar

Iakoubovskii, K., Mitsuishi, K., Nakayama, Y. and Furuya, K., Thickness measurements with electron energy loss spectroscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech., 71 (2008), 626–631.Google Scholar

Miyata, T., Fukuyama, M., Hibara, A. et al., Measurement of vibrational spectrum of liquid using monochromated scanning transmission electron microscopy-electron energy loss spectroscopy. Microscopy, 63 (2014), 377–382.Google Scholar

De Jonge, N., in Hawkes, P. W., ed., Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics Volume 190 (Elsevier, 2015) pp. 1–102.Google Scholar

Dukes, M. J., Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Correlative fluorescence microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy of quantum-dot-labeled proteins in whole cells in liquid. ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 4110–4116.Google Scholar

Cavalca, F., Hansen, T. W., Wagner, J. B. et al., In situ light spectroscopy in the environmental transmission electron microscope (ETEM). Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1184–1185.Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Miller, B. K. and Crozier, P. A., Atomic level observation of surface amorphization in anatase nanocrystals during light irradiation in water vapor. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 679–684.Google Scholar

Evans, J. E., Jungjohann, K. L., Browning, N. D. and Arslan, I., Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2809–2813.Google Scholar

Jensen, E., Engineering electrochemical setups for electron microscopy of liquid processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Denmark Technical University (2012).Google Scholar

Stokes, D. J., Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-ESEM) (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008).Google Scholar

Janiak, C., Ionic liquids for the synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. Z. Naturforsch., 68B (2013), 1059–1089.Google Scholar

Wang, C. M., Xu, W., Liu, J., et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy and spectroscopy studies of interfaces in Li ion batteries: challenges and opportunities. J. Mater. Res., 25 (2010), 1541–1547.Google Scholar

Kuwabata, S., Kongkanand, A., Oyamatsu, D. and Torimoto, T., Observation of ionic liquid by scanning electron microscope. Chem. Lett., 35 (2006), 600–603.Google Scholar

Xia, Y., Xiong, Y. J., Lim, B. and Skrabalak, S. E., Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48 (2009), 60–103.Google Scholar

Law, M., Goldberger, J. and Yang, P. D., Semiconductor nanowires and nanotubes. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 34 (2004), 83–122.Google Scholar

Klimov, V. I., Mikhailovsky, A. A., Xu, S. et al., Optical gain and stimulated emission in nanocrystal quantum dots. Science, 290 (2000), 314–317.Google Scholar

Ahmadi, T. S., Wang, Z. L., Green, T. C., Henglein, A. and ElSayed, M. A., Shape-controlled synthesis of colloidal platinum nanoparticles. Science, 272 (1996), 1924–1926.Google Scholar

Lauhon, L. J., Gudiksen, M. S., Wang, C. L. and Lieber, C. M., Epitaxial core-shell and core-multishell nanowire heterostructures. Nature, 420 (2002), 57–61.Google Scholar

Yin, Y. and Alivisatos, A. P., Colloidal nanocrystal synthesis and the organic-inorganic interface. Nature, 437 (2005), 664–670.Google Scholar

Tian, N., Zhou, Z. Y., Sun, S. G., Ding, Y. and Wang, Z. L., Synthesis of tetrahexahedral platinum nanocrystals with high-index facets and high electro-oxidation activity. Science, 316 (2007), 732–735.Google Scholar

Liao, H. G., Jiang, Y. X., Zhou, Z. Y., Chen, S. P. and Sun, S. G., Shape-controlled synthesis of gold nanoparticles in deep eutectic solvents for studies of structure-functionality relationships in electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47 (2008), 9100–9103.Google Scholar

Bogner, A., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Jouneau, P. H. and Gauthier, C., Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase. Ultramicroscopy, 104 (2005), 290–301.Google Scholar

Bogner, A., Jouneau, P. H., Thollet, G., Basset, D. and Gauthier, C.. A history of scanning electron microscopy developments: towards “Wet-STEM” imaging. Micron, 38 (2007), 390–401.Google Scholar

Barkay, Z., Wettability study using transmitted electrons in environmental scanning electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett., 96 (2010), 183109.Google Scholar

Yoshida, K., Bright, A.N., Ward, M.R. et al., Dynamic wet-ETEM observation of Pt/C electrode catalysts in a moisturized cathode atmosphere. Nanotechnology, 25 (2014), 425702.Google Scholar

Sakaue, M., Shiono, M., Konomi, M. et al., New preparation method using ionic liquid for fast and reliable SEM observation of biological specimens. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (Suppl. 3) (2014), 1012–1013.Google Scholar

Brodusch, N., Demers, H. and Gauvin, R., Ionic liquid used for charge compensation for high resolution imaging and analysis in the FE-SEM. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (Suppl 3) (2014), 38–39.Google Scholar

Tarascon, J. M. and Armand, M., Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 414 (2001), 359–367.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, K., Iriyama, Y., Asaka, T. et al., Dynamic visualization of the electric potential in an all-solid-state rechargeable lithium battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 49 (2010), 4414–4417.Google Scholar

Brazier, A., Dupont, L., Dantras-Laffont, L. et al., First cross-section observation of an all solid-state lithium-ion “nanobattery” by transmission electron microscopy. Chem.Mater., 20 (2008), 2352–2359.Google Scholar

Wang, C. M., Xu, W., Liu, J. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy observation of microstructure and phase evolution in a SnO₂ nanowire during lithium intercalation. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 1874–1880.Google Scholar

Lux, S. F., Schmuck, M., Rupp, B. et al., Mixtures of ionic liquids in combination with graphite electrodes: the role of Li-salt. ECS Trans., 16 (2009), 45–49.Google Scholar

Lewandowski, A. and Świderska-Mocek, A., Properties of the graphite-lithium anode in N-methyl-N-propylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide as an electrolyte. J. Power Sources, 171 (2007), 938–943.Google Scholar

Huang, J. Y., Zhong, L., Wang, C. M. et al., In situ observation of the electrochemical lithiation of a single SnO₂ nanowire electrode. Science, 330 (2010), 1515–1520.Google Scholar

Zhang, L. Q., Liu, X. H., Liu, Y. et al., Controlling the lithiation-induced strain and charging rate in nanowire electrodes by coating. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 4800–4809.Google Scholar

Wang, C. M., In situ transmission electron microscopy and spectroscopy studies of rechargeable batteries under dynamic operating conditions: a retrospective and perspective view. J. Mater. Res., 30 (2015), 326–339.Google Scholar

Liu, X. H., Zheng, H., Zhong, L. et al., Anisotropic swelling and fracture of silicon nanowires during lithiation. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 3312–3318.Google Scholar

Wang, F., Yu, H.-C., Chen, M.-H. et al., Tracking lithium transport and electrochemical reactions in nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 3 (2012), 1201.Google Scholar

Islam, M. M., and Bredow, T., Density functional theory study for the stability and ionic conductivity of Li₂O surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009), 672–676.Google Scholar

Gu, M., Kushima, A., Shao, Y. et al., Probing the failure mechanism of SnO₂ nanowires for sodium-ion batteries. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 5203−5211.Google Scholar

Liu, X. H., Zhang, L. Q., Zhong, L. et al., Ultrafast electrochemical lithiation of individual Si nanowire anodes. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2251–2258.Google Scholar

Wang, C.-M., Li, X., Wang, Z. et al., In situ TEM investigation of congruent phase transition and structural evolution of nanostructured silicon/carbon anode for lithium ion batteries. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 1624–1632.Google Scholar

Liu, X. H., Huang, S., Picraux, S. T. et al., Reversible nanopore formation in Ge nanowires during lithiation–delithiation cycling: an in situ transmission electron microscopy study. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 3991–3997.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Hudak, N. S., Huber, D. L. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy observation of pulverization of aluminum nanowires and evolution of the thin surface Al₂O₃ layers during lithiation–delithiation cycles. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 4188–4194.Google Scholar

Kushima, A., Liu, X. H., Zhu, G. et al., Leapfrog cracking and nanoamorphization of ZnO nanowires during in situ electrochemical lithiation. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 4535–4541.Google Scholar

Liu, X. H., Wang, J. W., Liu, Y. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy of electrochemical lithiation, delithiation and deformation of individual graphene nanoribbons. Carbon, 50 (2012), 3836–3844.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Zheng, H., Liu, X. H. et al., Lithiation-induced embrittlement of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 7245–7253.Google Scholar

Whittingham, M. S., Materials challenges facing electrical energy storage. MRS Bull., 33 (2008), 411–419.Google Scholar

Wu, H., Chan, G., Choi, J. W. et al., Stable cycling of double-walled silicon nanotube battery anodes through solid-electrolyte interphase control. Nat. Nanotechnol., 7 (2012), 310–315.Google Scholar

Christensen, J. and Newman, J., Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials. J. Solid State Electrochem., 10 (2006), 293–319.Google Scholar

McDowell, M. T., Ryu, I., Lee, S. W. et al., Studying the kinetics of crystalline silicon nanoparticle lithiation with in situ transmission electron microscopy. Adv. Mater., 24 (2012), 6034–6041.Google Scholar

Liu, X. H., Zhong, L., Huang, S. et al., Size dependent fracture of silicon nanoparticles during lithiation. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 1522–1531.Google Scholar

Gu, M., Wang, Z. G., Connell, J. G. et al., Electronic origin for the phase transition from amorphous Li_xSi to crystalline Li₁₅Si₄. ACS Nano, 7 (2013), 6303–6309.Google Scholar

Gu, M., Parent, L. R., Mehdi, B. L. et al., Demonstration of an electrochemical liquid cell for operando transmission electron microscopy observation of the lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si nanowire battery anodes. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 6106–6112.Google Scholar

Wang, C. M., Liao, H. G., Ross, F. M., Observation of materials processes in liquids by electron microscopy. MRS Bull., 40 (2015), 46–52.Google Scholar

Zheng, H., Xiao, D. D., Li, X. et al., New insight in understanding oxygen reduction and evolution in solid-state lithium–oxygen batteries using an in situ environmental scanning electron microscope. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 4245–4249.Google Scholar

Miller, D. J., Proff, C., Wen, J. G., Abraham, D. P., Bareño, J., Observation of microstructural evolution in Li battery cathode oxide particles by in situ electron microscopy. Adv. Energy Mater., 3 (2013), 1098–1103.Google Scholar

Danilatos, G. D., Review and outline of environmental SEM at present. J. Microsc. Oxford, 162 (1991), 391–402.Google Scholar

Bogner, A., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Jouneau, P.-H. and Gauthier, C., Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase. Ultramicroscopy, 104 (2005), 290–301.Google Scholar

Abrams, I. and McBain, J., A closed cell for electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys., 1 (1944), 607–609.Google Scholar

Thiberge, S., Zik, O. and Moses, E., An apparatus for imaging liquids, cells, and other wet samples in the scanning electron microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (2004), 2280–2289.Google Scholar

Suga, M, Nishiyama, H., Konyuba, Y. et al., The atmospheric scanning electron microscope with open sample space observes dynamic phenomena in liquid or gas. Ultramicroscopy, 111 (2011), 1650–1658.Google Scholar

Vidavsky, N., Addadi, S., Mahamid, J. et al., Initial stages of calcium uptake and mineral deposition in sea urchin embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111 (2014), 39–44.Google Scholar

Ominami, Y., Kawanishi, S., Ushiki, T. and Ito, S., A novel approach to scanning electron microscopy at ambient atmospheric pressure. Microscopy, 64 (2015), 97–104.Google Scholar

Jensen, E., Burrows, A. and Mølhave, K., Monolithic chip system with a microfluidic channel for in situ electron microscopy of liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 445–451.Google Scholar

Demers, H., Poirier-Demers, N., Réal, A. et al., Three-dimensional electron microscopy simulation with the CASINO Monte Carlo software. Scanning, 33 (2011), 135–146.Google Scholar

Kanaya, K. and Okayama, S., Penetration and energy-loss theory of electrons in solid targets. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 5 (1972), 43–58.Google Scholar

Goldstein, J., Newbury, D. E., Joy, D. C. et al., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis (New York: Springer, 2003).Google Scholar

Liv, N., Lazić, I., Kruit, P. and Hoogenboom, J. P., Scanning electron microscopy of individual nanoparticle bio-markers in liquid. Ultramicroscopy, 143 (2014), 93–99.Google Scholar

Behar, V., Nechushtan, A., Kliger, Y. et al., Methods for SEM inspection of fluid containing samples. US Patent 7230242 B2 (2007).Google Scholar

Fischer, D. A., Alsem, D. H., Simon, B., Prozorov, T. and Salmon, N., Development of an integrated platform for cross-correlative imaging of biological specimens in liquid using light and electron microscopies. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 476–477.Google Scholar

Thiberge, S., Nechushtan, A., Sprinzak, D. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 3346–3351.Google Scholar

Venkiteela, G. and Sun, Z. H., In situ observation of cement particle growth during setting. Cement Concrete Comp., 32 (2010), 211–218.Google Scholar

Tiede, K., Tear, S. P., David, H. and Boxall, A. B. A., Imaging of engineered nanoparticles and their aggregates under fully liquid conditions in environmental matrices. Water Res., 43 (2009), 3335–3343.Google Scholar

Lorenz, C., Tiede, K., Tear, S. et al., Imaging and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in sunscreens by electron microscopy, under wet and dry conditions. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health, 16 (2010), 406–428.Google Scholar

Joy, D. C. and Joy, C. S., Scanning electron microscope imaging in liquids: some data on electron interactions in water. J. Microsc. Oxford, 221 (2006), 84–88.Google Scholar

Dyab, A. K. F. and Paunov, V. N., Particle stabilised emulsions studied by WETSEM technique. Soft Matter, 6 (2010), 2613–2615.Google Scholar

Cohen, O., Beery, R., Levit, S. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of thyroid cells under fully hydrated conditions – A novel technique for a seasoned procedure: a brief observation. Thyroid, 16 (2006), 997–1001.Google Scholar

Kolmakova, N. and Kolmakov, A., Scanning electron microscopy for in situ monitoring of semiconductor–liquid interfacial processes: electron assisted reduction of Ag ions from aqueous solution on the surface of TiO₂ rutile nanowire. J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010), 17233–17237.Google Scholar

Wei, C., Lin, W. Y., Zainal, Z. et al., Bactericidal activity of TiO₂ photocatalyst in aqueous media: toward a solar-assisted water disinfection system. Environ. Sci. Technol., 28 (1994), 934–938.Google Scholar

Giocondi, J. L. and Rohrer, G. S., The influence of the dipolar field effect on the photochemical reactivity of Sr₂Nb₂O₇ and BaTiO₃ microcrystals. Top. Catal., 49 (2008), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrmann, J. M., Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal. Today, 53 (1999), 115–129.Google Scholar

Geisler-Lee, J., Wang, Q., Yao, Y. et al., Phytotoxicity, accumulation and transport of silver nanoparticles by Arabidopsis thaliana. Nanotoxicology, 7 (2012), 323–337.Google Scholar

Schneider, N. M., Norton, M. M., Mendel, B. J. et al., Electron–water interactions and implications for liquid cell electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118 (2014), 22373–22382.Google Scholar

Donev, E. U. and Hastings, J. T., Electron-beam-induced deposition of platinum from a liquid precursor. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2715–2718.Google Scholar

Al-Asadi, A. S., Zhang, J., Li, J., Potyrailo, R. A. and Kolmakov, A., Design and application of variable temperature setup for scanning electron microscopy in gases and liquids at ambient conditions. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 765–770.Google Scholar

Monat, C., Domachuk, P. and Eggleton, B., Integrated optofluidics: a new river of light. Nat. Photonics, 1 (2007), 106–114.Google Scholar

Erickson, D., Sinton, D. and Psaltis, D., Optofluidics for energy applications. Nat. Photonics, 5 (2011), 583–590.Google Scholar

Potyrailo, R. A., Starkey, T. A., Vukusicb, P. et al., Discovery of the surface polarity gradient on iridescent Morpho butterfly scales reveals a mechanism of their selective vapor response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110 (2013), 15567–15572.Google Scholar

Unocic, R. R., Sun, X. G., Sacci, R. L. et al., Direct visualization of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion batteries with in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1029–1037.Google Scholar

Klein, K., Anderson, I and De Jonge, N., Transmission electron microscopy with a liquid flow cell. J. Microsc., 242 (2011), 117–123.Google Scholar

Mølhave, K., Kallesøe, C., Wen, C. Y. et al., Microfabricated systems for electron microscopy of nanoscale processes: in-situ TEM creation of Si nanowire devices and in-situ SEM electrochemistry. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 322–323.Google Scholar

Cothren, J. E., Development of techniques and instrumentation for in situ imaging and spectroscopy of working nanodevices using ultrathin membrane based environmental cells. M.Sc. Thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (2011).Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Scanning electron microscopy to probe working nanowire gas sensors. M.Sc. Thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale (2013).Google Scholar

Ueda, S., Kobayashi, Y., Koizumi, S. and Tsutsumi, Y., In situ observation of water in a fuel cell catalyst using scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy, 64 (2015), 87–96.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. C., Geim, A. K., Katsnelson, M. et al., The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature, 446 (2007), 60–63.Google Scholar

Wilson, N. R., Pandey, P. A., Beanland, R. et al., Graphene oxide: structural analysis and application as a highly transparent support for electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 3 (2009), 2547–2556.Google Scholar

Lee, C., Wei, X., Kysar, J. W. and Hone, J., Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science, 321 (2008), 385–388.Google Scholar

Kraus, J., Reichelt, R., Günther, S. et al., Photoelectron spectroscopy of wet and gaseous samples through graphene membranes. Nanoscale, 6 (2014), 14394–14403.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. C., Eder, F., Kurasch, S. et al., Accurate measurement of electron beam induced displacement cross sections for single-layer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012), 196102.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. C., Girit, C. O., Crommie, M. and Zettl, A., Imaging and dynamics of light atoms and molecules on graphene. Nature, 454 (2008), 319–322.Google Scholar

Pantelic, R. S., Meyer, J. C., Kaiser, U. and Stahlberg, H., The application of graphene as a sample support in transmission electron microscopy. Solid State Commun., 152 (2012), 1375–1382.Google Scholar

Frank, L., Mikmeková, E., Müllerová, I. and Lejeune, M., Counting graphene layers with very slow electrons. Appl. Phys. Lett., 106 (2015), 013117.Google Scholar

Mutus, J., Livadaru, L., Robinson, J. T. et al., Low-energy electron point projection microscopy of suspended graphene, the ultimate ‘microscope slide’. New J. Phys., 13 (2011), 063011.Google Scholar

Longchamp, J.-N., Escher, C., Latychevskaia, T. and Fink, H.-W., Low-energy electron holographic imaging of gold nanorods supported by ultraclean graphene. Ultramicroscopy, 145 (2014), 80–84.Google Scholar

Jablonski, A. and Powell, C., Practical expressions for the mean escape depth, the information depth, and the effective attenuation length in Auger-electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 27 (2009), 253–261.Google Scholar

Kolmakov, A., Dikin, D. A., Cote, L. J. et al., Graphene oxide windows for in situ environmental cell photoelectron spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 651–657.Google Scholar

Xu, M., Fujita, D., Gao, J. and Hanagata, N., Auger electron spectroscopy: a rational method for determining thickness of graphene films. ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 2937–2945.Google Scholar

Kochat, V., Pal, A. N., Sneha, E. S. et al., High contrast imaging and thickness determination of graphene with in-column secondary electron microscopy. J. Appl. Phys., 110 (2011), 014315.Google Scholar

Krueger, M., Berg, S., Stone, D. et al., Drop-casted self-assembling graphene oxide membranes for scanning electron microscopy on wet and dense gaseous samples. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 10047–10054.Google Scholar

Park, S. and Ruoff, R. S., Chemical methods for the production of graphenes. Nat. Nanotechnol., 4 (2009), 217–224.Google Scholar

Li, D., Müller, M. B., Gilje, S., Kaner, R. B. and Wallace, G. G., Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol., 3 (2008), 101–105.Google Scholar

Cote, L. J., Kim, J., Tung, V. C. et al., Graphene oxide as surfactant sheets. Pure Appl. Chem., 83 (2010), 95–110.Google Scholar

Dikin, D. A., Stankovich, S., Zimney, E. J. et al., Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper. Nature, 448 (2007), 457–460.Google Scholar

Park, S., Lee, K.-S., Bozoklu, G. et al., Graphene oxide papers modified by divalent ions: enhancing mechanical properties via chemical cross-linking. ACS Nano, 2 (2008), 572–578.Google Scholar

Nair, R., Wu, H., Jayaram, P., Grigorieva, I. and Geim, A., Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak–tight graphene-based membranes. Science, 335 (2012), 442–444.Google Scholar

Bunch, J. S., Verbridge, S. S., Alden, J. S. et al., Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. Nano Lett., 8 (2008), 2458–2462.Google Scholar

Xu, M., Liang, T., Shi, M. and Chen, H., Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chemical Rev., 113 (2013), 3766–3798.Google Scholar

Büttner, M. and Oelhafen, P., XPS study on the evaporation of gold submonolayers on carbon surfaces. Surf. Sci., 600 (2006), 1170–1177.Google Scholar

Lin, Y.-C., Lu, C. C., Yeh, C. H. et al., Graphene annealing: how clean can it be? Nano Lett., 12 (2011), 414–419.Google Scholar

Suk, J. W., Kitt, A., Magnuson, C. W. et al., Transfer of CVD-grown monolayer graphene onto arbitrary substrates. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 6916–6924.Google Scholar

Balandin, A. A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W. et al., Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett., 8 (2008), 902–907.Google Scholar

Cote, L. J., Cruz-Silva, R. and Huang, J., Flash reduction and patterning of graphite oxide and its polymer composite. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131 (2009), 11027–11032.Google Scholar

Gilje, S., Farrar, J., Dubin, S. et al., Photothermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide for patterning and distributed ignition applications. Adv. Mater., 22 (2010), 419–423.Google Scholar

Kumar, P., Subrahmanyam, K. and Rao, C., Graphene patterning and lithography employing laser/electron-beam reduced graphene oxide and hydrogenated graphene. Mater. Express, 1 (2011), 252–256.Google Scholar