‘Abd al-Wahhāb al-Nuwairī. 1924–1942. Nihāyat al-’arab fi-funūn al-’adab. Cairo: Dār al-Aktāb al-Miṣriyyah.Google Scholar

Abdulaziz, Mohamed and Osinde, Ken. 1997. Sheng and Engsh: Development of mixed codes among the urban youth in Kenya. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 125: 43–63.Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch. 2009. Clause structure and verb series. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 1–33.Google Scholar

Agnihotri, Rama Kant. 2007. Hindi. An essential grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ahulu, Samuel. 1995. Hybridized English in Ghana. English Today 11, 4: 31–36.Google Scholar

Aitchison, Jean. 1995. Tadpoles, cuckoos, and multiple births. Language contact and models of change. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.). Linguistic change under contact conditions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Albalá Hernández, Carmen P. 1997. El español de los chamorros de las islas Marianas. Español Actual: Revista de Español Vivo 68: 63–74.Google Scholar

Albalá Hernández, Carmen P. 2000. Americanismos en las Indias del Poniente: Voces de origen indígena Americano en las lenguas del Pacífico. Madrid and Frankfurt/M.: Iberoamericana and Vervuert.Google Scholar

Albalá Hernández, Carmen P. and y Salamanca, Rafael Rodríguez-Ponga. 1986. Relaciones de España con las Islas Marianas: La lengua chamorra. Madrid: Fundación Juan March.Google Scholar

Alonso, José Luis. 1982. Onomástica y marginalidad en la Picaresca. Imprévue 1: 203–235.Google Scholar

Alvar, Manuel. 1986. Cuestiones de bilingüismo y diglosia en español. In Alvar, Manuel, Maitena, Echevarría, and Constantino, García (eds.). El castellano actual en las comunidades bilingües de España. Salamanca: Consejería de Educación y Cultura, Junta de Castilla y León, pp. 11–48.Google Scholar

Álvarez, Manuel, Ariza, Manuel, and Mendoza, Josefa. 2000. La onomástica personal en Carmona (Sevilla) en el siglo XVI. In Dieter Kremer (ed.). Onomastik. Akten des 18. Internationalen Kongresses für Namenforschung. Trier, 12.-17. April 1993. Bd. 2: Namensysteme im interkulturellen Vergleich. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 156–166.Google Scholar

Amery, Rob. 2000. Warrabarna Kaurna! Reclaiming an Australian language. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar

Amery, Rob and Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2005. Cost benefit analysis of Kaurna language reclamation. Adelaide: Adelaide University, Linguistics Department.Google Scholar

Andersen, Gisle. 2014. Pragmatic borrowing. Journal of Pragmatics 67: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. Contact languages: Ecology and evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto, Matthews, Stephen, and Lim, Lisa (eds.). 2007. Deconstructing creole. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ariza, Manuel, Salvador, Antonio, and Viudas, Antonio (eds.). 1988. Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española: Cáceres, 30 de marzo - 4 de abril de 1987. Vol. 2. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar

Arranz Márquez, Luis. 1991. Repartimientos y encomiendas en la Isla Española: El repartimiento de Albuquerque de 1514. Madrid: Ed. Fundación García Arévalo.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2000. Interpreting the language-mixing in terms of codeswitching: The case of the Franco-Italian interface in the Middle Ages. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1273–1281.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2002. Quand les langues romanes se confondent … La Romania vue d’ailleurs. Langage et société 99: 9–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2006a. Le français au Levant, jadis et naguère: À la recherche d’une langue perdue. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2006b. Evidence of francophony in mediaeval Levant: Decipherment and interpretation (MS. BnF. Copte 43). Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem Magnes Press.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2007. Linguistic hybridization in the Chronicle of Morea. In Paraskhou, Deisis and Spendzas, Aristeas (eds.). Η Πελοπóννησος μετά την Δ’ Σταυροφορία του 1204 (Πρακτικά διεθνους συνεδρίου – Μυστράς, 1–3 Οκτωβρίου 2004). Athens: Διεθνής Eπιστημονική Eταιρεία Πληθωνικών και Βυζαντινών μελετών-Mystras: Κοινωφελές Ίδρυμα Βυζαντινών και Μεταβυζαντινών Σπουδών Μυστρά, pp. 37–48.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril. 2008. L’ancien français, sociolecte d’une caste au pouvoir: Royaume de Jérusalem, Morée, Chypre. In Fagard, Benjamin, Prévost, Sophie, Combettes, Bernard, and Bertrand, Olivier (eds.). Évolutions en français: Études de linguistique diachronique. Bern: Lang, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar

Aslanov, Cyril and Kedar, Benjamin Z.. 2010. Problems in the study of transcultural borrowing in the Frankish Levant. In Borgolte, Michael and Schneidmüller, Bernd (eds.). Hybride Kulturen im mittelalterlichen Europa: Vorträge und Workshops einer internationalen Frühlingsschule. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 278–279.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 1995. The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In Milroy, Lesley and Muysken, Pieter (eds.). One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–135.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 1999. From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism 3, 4: 309–332.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 2007a. The monolingual bias in bilingualism research, or: Why bilingual talk is (still) a challenge for linguistics. In Heller (ed.), pp. 319–339.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter. 2007b. Mobility, contact and accommodation. In Llamas, Carmen, Mullany, Louise, and Stockwell, Peter (eds). The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter, Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Müller, Frank. 1999. Language in time. The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter and Hinskens, Frans. 2005. The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change. In Auer, Hinskens, and Kerswill (eds.), pp. 335–357.Google Scholar

Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, and Kerswill, Paul (eds.). 2005. Dialect change. Convergence and divergence in European languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Augé, Marc. 2009. Pour une anthropologie de la mobilité. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Backus, Ad. 2003. Can a mixed language be conventionalized alternational codeswitching? In Matras and Bakker (eds.), pp. 237–270.Google Scholar

Baglioni, Daniele. 2006. La scripta italoromanza del regno di Cipro: Edizione e commento di testi di scriventi ciprioti del Quattrocento. Rome: Aracne Editrice.Google Scholar

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1979. Old and new views on language history and language relationships. In Lüdtke, Helmut (ed.). Kommunikationstheoretische Grundlagen des Sprachwandels. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 139–181.Google Scholar

Baker, Philip and Huber, Magnus. 2000. Constructing new pronominal systems from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Linguistics 38, 5: 833–866.Google Scholar

Baker, Philip and Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2013. The creole legacy of a bounteous mutineer: Edward Young’s Caribbean contribution to the language of Pitcairn and Norfolk Islands. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 45, 2: 170–186.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own. The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Metis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 2000a. Rapid language change: Creolisation, intertwining, convergence. In Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April, and Trask, Larry (eds.). Time depth in historical linguistics. Vol. 2. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 575–610.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 2000b. Convergence intertwining: An alternative way towards the genesis of mixed languages. In Gilbers, Dicky, Nerbonn, John, and Schaeken, Jos (eds.). Languages in contact. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 2003. Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In Matras and Bakker (eds.), pp. 107–150.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In Kouwenberg, Silvia and Singler, Victor (eds.). The handbook of pidgin and creole studies. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 130–157.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter and Mous, Maarten (eds.). 1994a. Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter and Mous, Maarten (eds.). 1994b. Introduction. In Bakker and Mous (eds.), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter and Muysken, Pieter. 1995. Mixed languages and language intertwining. In Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter, and Smith, Norval (eds.). Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 41–52.Google Scholar

Bamgbose, Ayo. 1991. Language and the nation. The language question in Sub-Saharan Africa. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Barton, David. 1994: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps toward an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar

Baudouin de Courtenay, Jan N. 1897. Statement of linguistic principles. In Baudoin de Courtenay, Jan N. 1972. A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology. The beginnings of structural linguistics. Ed. by Stankiewicz, Edward. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, pp. 213–215.Google Scholar

Bechert, Heinz. 1993. Einführung in die Indologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Begon, Michael, Townsend, Colin A., and Harper, John L.. 2006. Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems. 4th edn. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bender, Byron W. 1971. Micronesian languages. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.). Linguistics in Oceania. Current trends in linguistics vol. 8. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 426–465.Google Scholar

Berman, Tzeporah. 1994. The rape of mother nature? Women in the language of environmental discourse. First published in Trumpeter 11, 4: 173–178. Quoted from the reprint in Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.) 2001, pp. 258–269.Google Scholar

Berruto, Gaetano. 2003. Sul parlante nativo. In Radatz, Hans-Ingo and Schlösser, Rainer (eds.). Donum Grammaticorum. Festschrift für Harro Stammerjohann. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Dermarkar, Cynthia, Pfänder, Stefan, and Rabus, Achim (eds.). 2014. Congruence in contact-induced language change. Language families, typological resemblance, and perceived similarity. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bickerton, Derek. 1973. The nature of a creole continuum. Language 49: 640–669.Google Scholar

Biggs, Bruce G. 1972. Implications of linguistic subgrouping with special reference to Polynesia. In Green, Roger C. and Kelly, Marion (eds.). Studies in Oceanic culture history. Vol. 3. Honolulu: Bishop Museum, pp. 143–152.Google Scholar

Bilger, Mireille (ed.). 1999. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 4, 2. Special issue on L’oral spontané.Google Scholar

Biloa, Edmond. 1999. Structure phrastique du Camfranglais: état de la question. In Echu, George and Grunstrom, Allan W. (eds.). Official bilingualism and linguistic communication in Cameroon. New York: Lang, pp. 147–174.Google Scholar

Birch, Charles and Cobb, John B. Jr. 1981. The liberation of life: From the cell to the community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bissoonauth, Anu. 2011. Language shift and maintenance in multilingual Mauritius: The case of Indian ancestral languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 32, 5: 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2010. Le français. Usages de la langue parlée. Leuven and Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 1992. Codeswitching and the exclusivity of social identities: Some data from campus Kiswahili. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 13, 1–2: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan and Dong, Jie. 2010: Language and movement in space. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.). The Handbook of language and globalization. Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 366–385.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 1977. The Proto-Austronesian pronouns and Austronesian subgrouping: A preliminary report. Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 1: 1–15.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert 2000. Chamorro historical phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 39, 1: 83–122.Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1965. The atomization of meaning. Language 41, 4: 555–573.Google Scholar

Bollée, Annegret. 1977. Zur Entstehung der französischen Kreolendialekte im Indischen Ozean: Kreolisierung ohne Pidginisierung. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar

Bollée, Annegret. 1982. Die Rolle der Konvergenz bei der Kreolisierung. In Ureland, P. Sture (ed.). Die Leistung der Strataforschung und der Kreolistik. Typologische Aspekte der Sprachkontaktforschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 391–405.Google Scholar

Bollée, Annegret. 2009. Le créole mauricien: Un parler du deuxième génération? In Hookoomsing, Ludwig, and Schnepel (eds.), pp. 67–84.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, Dressler, Wolfgang U., Orešnik, Janez, Teržan, Karmen, and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (eds.). 1995. Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel. Beiträge zum internationalen Symposium über ‘Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel’ an der Universität Maribor vom 13.5.–15.5.1993. Bochum: BrockmeyerGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Bowen, Donald J. 1971. Hispanic languages and influence in Oceania. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.). Linguistics in Oceania. Current trends in linguistics vol. 8. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 938–952.Google Scholar

Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1970. Los nombres de pila en México desde 1540 hasta 1950. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 19: 12–48.Google Scholar

Boyd-Bowman, Peter. 1985. Indice geobiográfico de más de 56 mil pobladores de la América Hispánica (1493–1519). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar

Braudel, Fernand. 1981–1982. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean world in the age of Philip II (2 vols.). Ed. by Reynolds, Siân, 4th edn. London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 2009. Language and space: The variationist approach. In Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.). Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 1: Theories and methods. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 142–162.Google Scholar

Broschart, Jürgen. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1: 123–165.Google Scholar

Buesa Oliver, Tomás. 1988. Recursos fónicos en la afectividad de los antropónimos. In Ariza, Salvador, and Viudas (eds.), pp. 1613–1640.Google Scholar

Buffett, Alice and Laycock, Donald. 1989: Speak Norfolk today. Norfolk Island: Himii Publishing.Google Scholar

Bundgaard, Peer F. 2010. Husserl and language. In Schmicking, Daniel and Gallagher, Shaun (eds.). Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 369–400.Google Scholar

Burrus, Ernest J. 1954. Sanvitores’ grammar and catechism in the Mariana (or Chamorro) language (1668). Anthropos 49: 934–960.Google Scholar

Button, Graham. 1987. Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. Social Psychology Quarterly 50, 2: 160–171.Google Scholar

Calvet, Louis-Jean. 1994. Les voix de la ville: Introduction à la sociolinguistique urbaine. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Calvet, Louis-Jean. 1997. Vernaculaire. In Moreau (ed.), pp. 291–294.Google Scholar

Calvet, Louis-Jean 2006. Towards an ecology of world languages. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 1990: Demythologizing sociolinguistics: Why language does not reflect society. In Joseph and Taylor (eds.), pp. 73–93.Google Scholar

Caravedo, Rocío. 1983. Estudios sobre el español de Lima: Variación contextual de la sibilante. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar

Caravedo, Rocío. 1986. La variabilidad del segmento ‘d’ en el español de Lima. In Moreno de Alba, José (ed.). Actas del II Congreso Internacional sobre el Español de América. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp. 281–287.Google Scholar

Caravedo, Rocío. 1987. Constricciones contextuales del español hablado en Lima. El caso de /s/. In Morales, Humberto López and Vaquero, María (eds.). Actas del I Congreso Internacional sobre el Español de América. San Juan: Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española, pp. 665–674.Google Scholar

Carayol, Michel and Chaudenson, Robert. 1979. Essai d'analyse implicationnelle d'un continuum linguistique: français–créole. In Wald, Paul and Manessy, Gabriel (eds.). Plurilinguism: Normes, situations, stratégies. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 129–172.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1975. La question urbaine. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar

Certeau, Michel de. 1980. L’invention du quotidian. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1985. Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In Olson, David R., Torrance, Nancy, and Hildyard, Angela (eds.). Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–123.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 2001. Vernacular universals. In Fontana, Josep M., McNally, Louise, Turell, Teresa, and Vallduvi, Enric (eds.). ICLaVE 1: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 2003. Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 2004. Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In Kortmann (ed.), pp. 127–145.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack. 2009. Cognition and the linguistic continuum: From vernacular to standard. In Filppula, Klemola, and Paulasto (eds.), pp. 19–32.Google Scholar

Chambers, John K. and Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack, Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.). 2002. The handbook of language variation and change. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Chamorro, Pilar. 2012. Future time reference and irrealis modality in Chamorro: A study of preverbal para. Cahiers Chronos 25: 91–113.Google Scholar

Chaudenson, Robert. 1992. Des îles, des hommes, des langues: Essai sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Chaudenson, Robert, Mougeon, Raymond, and Beniak, Edouard. 1993. Vers une approche panlectale de la variation du français. Paris: Didier Erudition.Google Scholar

Chawla, Saroj. 2001. Linguistic and philosophical roots of our environmental crisis. In Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.), pp. 115–123.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, and Williams, Ann. 2005. Phonology, grammar, and discourse in dialect convergence. In Auer, Hinskens, and Kerswill (eds.), pp. 135–167.Google Scholar

Clayton, Jean, Barnett, Jenny, Kemelfield, Graeme, and Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Desert schools: An investigation of English language and literacy among young Aboriginal people in seven communities. Canberra: DEETYA. [www.iier.org.au/qjer/qjer15/clayton.html]Google Scholar

Clements, J. Clancy. 2009. The linguistic legacy of Spanish and Portuguese: Colonial expansion and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clough, James C. 1876. On the existence of mixed languages, being an examination of the fundamental axioms of the foreign school of modern philology, more especially as applied to the English. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael. 2003. Dynamics of language contact. English and immigrant languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Codrington, Robert H. 1885. The Melanesian languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Comnena, Anna. 1928. The Alexiad. Trans. Dawes, Elizabeth A.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Contini-Morava, Ellen. 1994. Noun classification in Swahili. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, Publications of the Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities. [http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/swahili/swahili.html]Google Scholar

Costenoble, H. 1940. Die Chamoro Sprache. S’Gravenhage: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 1981. Introduction: The concept of native speaker. In Coulmas, Florian (ed.). A Festschrift for native speaker. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Coulmas, Florian. 2005. Sociolinguistics. The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2003. Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7: 416–31.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2010. Language, ideology, media and social change. In Junod, Karen and Maillat, Didier (eds.). Performing the self. SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 24. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 55–79.Google Scholar

Couto, Hildo H. do. 1996. Introdução ao estudo das línguas crioulas e pidgins. Brasilia: Editora da Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar

Couto, Hildo H.. 2002. Anticrioulo: Manifestação lingüística de resistência cultural. Brazil: Thesaurus.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [2nd edition, 2003]Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2003. Mixed languages and acts of identity: An evolutionary approach. In Matras and Bakker (eds.), pp. 41–72.Google Scholar

Crowley, Terry. 1990. Beach-la-Mar to Bislama: The emergence of a national language in Vanuatu. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Crowley, Tony. 1990. That obscure object of desire: A science of language. In Joseph and Taylor (eds.), pp. 27–50.Google Scholar

Crystal, David 1994: An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. 2nd edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Lawrence J. 1992. Ancient Chamorro society. Honolulu: Bess Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. 1901. The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

DeCamp, David. 1971. Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hymes (ed.), pp. 349–370.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2003. Against creole exceptionalism. Language 79, 2: 391–410.Google Scholar

DeGraff, Michel. 2005. Linguists’ most dangerous myth: The fallacy of creole exceptionalism. Language in Society 34: 533–591.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. 1980. Mille plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Denoon, Donald (ed.). 1997. The Cambridge history of the Pacific Islanders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dermarkar, Cynthia. 2014. French meets Arabic in Cairo: discourse markers as gestures. In Besters-Dilger, Juliane, Dermarkar, Cynthia, Pfänder, Stefan, and Rabus, Achim, (eds.). Congruence in contact-induced language change. Language families, typological resemblance, and perceived similarity. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 275–293.Google Scholar

Dermarkar, Cynthia, Gadet, Françoise, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan. 2009. Vom Französischen in den Kolonien zum français global? Der Fall Ägypten als Spiegel für linguistische Arealtypologien. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 59/2008: 101–127.Google Scholar

Dermarkar, Cynthia and Pfänder, Stefan. 2010. Le français cosmopolite. Témoignages de la dynamique langagière dans l’espace urbain du Caire. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana. 2005. The unbearable lightness of being bilingual: English-Afrikaans language contact in South Africa. Language Sciences 27: 113–135.Google Scholar

Díaz, Norma, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan. 2002. Procesos lingüísticos en situaciones de contacto. Parámetros y perspectivas. In Díaz, Norm, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan (eds.). La Romania americana. Procesos lingüísticos en situaciones de contacto. Frankfurt/M.: Vervuert, pp. 389–441.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 1999. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Drechsel, Emanuel J. 1997. Mobilian jargon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Drescher, Martina and Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid. 2010. Les variétés non-hexagonales du français et la syntaxe de l’oral. Première approche. In Drescher, Martina and Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid (eds.). La syntaxe de l’oral dans les variétés non-hexagonales du français. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1984. Explaining natural phonology. Phonology Yearbook Vol. 1, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Mayerthaler, Willi, Panagl, Oswald, and Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (eds.). 1987. Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Drew, Paul and Heritage, John (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–65.Google Scholar

Dua, Hans R. 1992. Hindi-Urdu as pluricentric language. In Clyne, Michael (ed.). Pluricentric languages; Differing norms in different nations. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 381–400.Google Scholar

Dufour, Sophie, Kriegel, Sibylle, Alleesaib, Mushina, and Nguyen, Noël. 2014. The perception of the French /s/-/ʃ/ contrast in early Creole-French bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 1200.Google Scholar

Durand, Guillaume and Logossah, Kinvi. 2002. Les noms de famille d’origine africaine de la population martiniquaise d’ascendence servile. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 2001. Keyterms in language and culture. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro and Goodwin, Charles (eds.). 1992. Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dyen, Isidore. 1965. A lexicostatistical classification of the Austronesian languages. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar

Eades, Diana. 1982. You gotta know how to talk: Information seeking in South-East Queensland Aboriginal Society. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2: 61–82.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2004. Variation and a sense of place. In Fought (ed.), pp. 107–118.Google Scholar

Edgecombe, Jean. 1991. Norfolk Island – South Pacific: Island of history and many delights. Thornleigh: J. Edgecombe.Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A., Feagin, Crawford, and Mühlhäusler, Peter (eds.). 1990. Development and diversity – language variation across time and space. Arlington: University of Texas and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Edwards, John. 2001. The ecology of language revival. Current Issues in Language Planning 2, 2–3: 231–241.Google Scholar

Edwards, William H. 1983. Plants in Pitjantjatjara life and mythology. Unpublished paper presented at the Federal Conference of the Society for Growing Australian Plants, Adelaide.Google Scholar

Eichler, Ernst, Hilty, Gerold, Löffler, Heinrich, Steger, Hugo, and Zgusta, Ladislav (eds.). 1996. Namenforschung/Name Studies/Les noms propres. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Onomastik/An International Handbook of Onomastics/Manuel international d’onomastique. Vol. 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Eldem, Edhem. 2006. Capitulations and Western trade. In Faroqhi, Suraiya N. (ed.). The Cambridge history of Turkey, Vol. 3: The later Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–335.Google Scholar

Eliasson, Stig. 2015. The birth of language ecology: Interdisciplinary influences in Einar Haugen’s ‘The ecology of language’. Language Sciences 50: 78–92.Google Scholar

Éloy, Jean-Michel. 2004. Des langues collatérales: problèmes et propositions. In Éloy, Jean-Michel (ed.). Des langues collatérales: Problèmes linguistiques, socio-linguistiques et glottopolitiques de la proximité linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar

Ennis, Juan A. and Pfänder, Stefan. 2010. Zur – fragwürdigen – Legitimation des Laboratoriums Kreol(istik). In Ludwig and Röseberg (eds.), pp. 257–282.Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick. 2004. Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Escobar, Anna María. 2007. Migración, contacto de lenguas encubierto y difusión de variantes lingüísticas. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 10: 93–107.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2009. Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 429–492.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human languages. Current Anthropology 46, 4: 621–646.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 2008. Don’t sleep, there are snakes. Life and language in the Amazonian jungle. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Everett, Daniel L. 2009. Pirahã culture and grammar: A response to some criticisms. Language 85, 2: 405–442.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1971. Absence of the copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk, and pidgins. In Hymes (ed.), pp. 141–150.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1975. Towards a characterisation of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics 17, 1: 1–14.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. and DeBose, Charles E.. 1977. Simplified registers, broken languages and pidginization. In Valdman, Albert (ed.). Pidgin and creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 99–125.Google Scholar

Fernández Rodríguez, Mauro. 2005. Leyenda e historia del término diglosia: Su invención y su primera expansion. In Ríos, Luis Santos (ed.). Palabras, norma, discurso: En memoria de Fernando Lázaro Carreter. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, pp. 447–464.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against method. 3rd edn. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Feynman, Richard. 1967. The character of physical law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin. 1998. Ecolinguistics: State of the art. First published in Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23, 1: 3–16. Quoted from the reprint in Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.) 2001, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin. 2000. Language and ecology: Ecolinguistic perspectives for 2000 and beyond. In Selected Papers from AILA 99 Tokyo. Tokyo, pp. 162–176.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin and Mühlhäusler, Peter (eds.). 2001. The ecolinguistics reader. Language, ecology and environment. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin and Penz, Hermine (eds.). 2007. Sustaining language: Essays in applied ecolinguistics. Wien: LIT.Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin, Penz, Hermine, and Trampe, Wilhelm (eds.). 2002. Colorful green ideas: Papers from the conference 30 Years of Language and Ecology (Graz, 2000) and the symposium Sprache und Ökologie (Passau, 2001). Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Paulasto, Heli (eds.). 2009a. Vernacular universals and language contacts: Evidence from varieties of English and beyond. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani, and Paulasto, Heli (eds.). 2009b. Vernacular universals and language contacts: An overview. In Filppula, Klemola, and Paulasto (eds.), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Fischer, John L. 1961. The retention rate of Chamorro basic vocabulary. Lingua 10: 255–266.Google Scholar

Fischer, Steven R. (ed.). 2013. Oceanic voices – European quills. The early documents on and in Chamorro and Rapanui. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Flint, Elwyn H. 1964. Earlier work on the languages of Pitcairn and Norfolk Islands. In Ross and Moverley, pp. 102–104.Google Scholar

Fontanille, Jacques. 1998. Sémiotique du discours. Limoges: Presses Universitaires de Limoges.Google Scholar

Forlot, Guy and Eloy, Jean-Michel. 2010. Le spontané et la réflexivité en (socio)linguistique. In Boyer, Henri (ed.). Pour une épistémologie de la sociolinguistique. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, pp. 163–170.Google Scholar

Fornel, Michel de and Quéré, Louis (eds.). 1999. La logique des situations. Nouveaux regards sur l'écologie des activités sociales. Numéro spécial de la revue Raisons Pratiques, 10.Google Scholar

Fouchard, Jean. 1988. Les marrons de la liberté. Port-au-Prince: Éditions Henri Deschamps.Google Scholar

Fought, Carmen (ed.). 2004. Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Franceschini, Rita. 1998. Code-switching and the notion of code in linguistics: Proposals for a dual focus model. In Auer, Peter (ed.). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity. London: Routledge, pp. 51–74.Google Scholar

François, Alexandre. 2004. Reconstructing the geocentric system of Proto Oceanic. Oceanic Linguistics 43, 1: 1–32.Google Scholar

François, Alexandre. 2010. A comparison of geocentric directionals across Bank and Torres languages. Paper presented at the 8th Conference on Oceanic Linguistics, Auckland, New Zealand, 5 January 2010.Google Scholar

Frank, Michael C., Everett, Daniel L., Fedorenko, Evelina, and Gibson, Edward. 2008. Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition 108, 3: 819–824.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise. 2011. What can be learned about the grammar of French from corpora of French spoken outside France. In Konopka, Marek, Kubczak, Jaqueline, Mair, Christian, Štícha, František, and Waßner, Ulrich H. (eds.). Grammatik und Korpora 2009. Dritte Internationale Konferenz, Mannheim 22.-24.09.2009. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 87–120.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise, Coveney, Aidan, Dalbera, Jean-Philippe, Fattier, Dominique, and Ludwig, Ralph. 2009. Sociolinguistique, écologie des langues, etc. Langage & Société 129: 121–135.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise and Guerin, Emmanuelle. 2012. Des données pour étudier la variation: petits gestes méthodologiques, gros effets. Cahiers de Linguistique 38, 1: 41–65.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise, Ludwig, Ralph, Mondada, Lorenza, Pfänder, Stefan, and Simon, Anne-Catherine. 2012. Un grand corpus de français parlé: Le CIEL-F. Choix épistémologiques et réalisations empiriques. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée 17, 1: 39–54.Google Scholar

Gadet, Françoise, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan. 2009. Francophonie et typologie des situations. Cahiers de Linguistique 34, 1: 143–162.Google Scholar

García Cornejo, Rosalía. 1998. Sobre los nombres y apellidos en dos documentos andaluces del siglo XV. Archivo Hispalense 246: 171–198.Google Scholar

Gardner Chloros, Penelope. 2009. Code-switching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gardner Chloros, Penelope. 2010. Language contact and code-mixing. In Hickey (ed.), pp. 188–207.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold and Sacks, Harvey. 1970. On formal structures of practical actions. In McKinney, John C. and Tiryakian, Edward A. (eds.). Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments. New York: Meredith, pp. 337–366.Google Scholar

Garner, Mark. 2004. Language: An ecological view. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar

Gérard-Plasmans, Delphine. 2005. La présence française en Égypte entre 1914 et 1936. De l'impérialisme à l'influence et de l'influence à la cooperation. Darnétal: Éd. Darnétalaises.Google Scholar

Gibson, James J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Glinert, Lewis. 1993. Language as a quasilect: Hebrew in contemporary Anglo-Jewry. In Glinert, Lewis (ed.). Hebrew in Ashkenaz: A language in exile. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–264.Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 1996. Green grammar and grammatical metaphor, or language and myth of power, or metaphors we die by. First published in Journal of Pragmatics 25: 537–560. Quoted from the reprint in Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.) 2001, pp. 203–225.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1961. Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gathering. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1964. The neglected situation. American Anthropologist 66, 6: 133–136.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981a. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981b. Footing. In Goffman, Erving (ed.). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 124–159.Google Scholar

Gómez Rendón, Jorge. 2005. La media lengua de Imbabura. In Olbertz, Hella and Muysken, Pieter (eds.). Encuentros y conflictos: Bilingüismo y contacto de lenguas en el mundo andino. Frankfurt/M. and Madrid: Vervuert and Iberoamericana, pp. 39–57.Google Scholar

Gómez Rendón, Jorge. 2007. Grammatical borrowing in Imbabura Quichua (Ecuador). In Matras and Sakel (eds.), pp. 481–522.Google Scholar

González Ollé, Fernando. 1962. Los sufijos dimminutivos en castellano medieval. Madrid: Gómez.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Psathas, George (ed.). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 97–121.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2003. The semiotic body in its environment. In Coupland, Justine and Gwyn, Richard (eds.). Discourse, the body and identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–42.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007a. Environmentally coupled gestures. In Duncan, Susan D., Cassell, Justine, and Levy, Elena T. (eds.). Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 195–212.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 2007b. Participation, stance, and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society 18, 1: 53–73.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie H.. 2004. Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.). A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 222–244.Google Scholar

Gordon, Raymond G. Jr. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International. [Online version www.ethnologue.com]Google Scholar

Granberry, Julian and Vescelius, Gary S.. 2004. Languages of the pre-Columbian Antilles. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

Grant, Anthony P. 1994. Shelta: The secret language of Irish travelers viewed as a mixed language. In Bakker and Mous (eds.), pp. 123–150.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1999. Are there mixed languages? In Greenberg, Joseph H., 2005. Genetic linguistics: Essays on theory and method. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 359–357.Google Scholar

Greenhill, Simon J., Blust, Robert, and Gray, Russell D.. 2008. The Austronesian basic vocabulary database: From bioinformatics to lexomics. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 4: 271–283.Google Scholar

Gudschinsky, Sarah C. 1962. Handbook of literacy. California: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar

Gueunier, Nicole. 2000: Le français au Liban. In Antoine, Gérald and Cerquiglini, Bernard (eds.). Histoire de la langue française. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 749–63.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gumperz, John J. and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.). 1996. Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Haarmann, Harald. 1996. Ökolinguistik. In Goebl, Hans, Nelde, Peter H., Stary, Zdenek, and Woelck, Wolfgang (eds.). Kontaktlinguistik/Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (HSK), Vol. 12.1. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 842–852.Google Scholar

Haeckel, Ernst. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Allgemeine Grundzüge der organischen Formen-Wissenschaft, mechanisch begründet durch die von Charles Darwin reformirte Descendenz-Theorie. Zweiter Band: Allgemeine Entwicklungsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin: Georg Reimer.Google Scholar

Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1950. Leave your language alone! New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar

Hall, Robert A. Jr. 1966. Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1990. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. First published in Journal of Applied Linguistics 6: 7–36. Reprinted in Martin Pütz (ed.). 1992. Thirty years of linguistic evolution. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 59–95. Quoted from the reprint in Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.) 2001, pp. 175–202.Google Scholar

Hannerz, Ulf. 1980. Exploring the city. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom. 1961. Theories and things: A brief study in prescriptive metaphysics. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, Brockmeier, Jens, and Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1998. Greenspeak – A study of environmental discourse. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Harries, Lyndon. 1976. The nationalization of Swahili in Kenya. Language in Society 5: 153–164.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1979. The language makers. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1981. The language myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42, 1: 25–70.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard. 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar I. 1969. The Norwegian language in America: A study in bilingual behavior. Reprint vols. 1 and 2. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Haugen, Einar I. 1972. The ecology of language. In Haugen, Einar, The ecology of language: Essays. Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 325–339.Google Scholar

Have, Paul ten. 2002. Ontology or methodology? Comments on Speer’s ‘natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies 4, 4: 527–530.Google Scholar

Haviland, John. 2005. Directional precision in Zinacantec deictic gestures: (Cognitive?) preconditions of talk about space. Intellectica 41–42: 25–54.Google Scholar

Heath, Christian. 1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heath, Christian and Hindmarsh, Jon. 2000. Configuring action in objects: From mutual space to media space. Mind, Culture and Activity 7, 1–2: 81–104.Google Scholar

Heath, Christian and Luff, Paul. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Attributive possession in creoles. Manuscript, Universities of Cologne and Düsseldorf.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27, 3: 529–572.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G.. 1980. Language and dialect atlas of Kenya. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Heller, Monica (ed.). 2007. Bilingualism: A social approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2002. Philosophical writings. Ed. by Forster, Michael N.. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2005. Sprachphilosophie: Ausgewählte Schriften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2010. The handbook of language contact. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hinskens, Frans, Auer, Peter, and Kerswill, Paul. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Auer, Hinskens, and Kerswill (eds.), pp. 1–48.Google Scholar

Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1987. Refurbishing our foundations. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Holm, John A. 2000. An introduction to pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hookoomsing, Vinesh, Ludwig, Ralph, and Schnepel, Burkhard (eds.). 2009. Multiple identities in action: Mauritius and some Antillean parallelisms. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 1988. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.). Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar

Horrocks, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1795. [Letter to Friedrich Schiller] XIX. Tegel, den 14 September 1795. In Briefwechsel zwischen Schiller und Wilhelm v. Humboldt. Mit einer Vorerinnerung über Schiller und den Gang seiner Geistesentwicklung von W. von Humboldt. 1830. Stuttgart and Tübingen: J. G. Cotta, pp. 196–202.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1820. On the comparative study of language and its relation to the different periods of language development. In Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1997. Essays on language. Ed. by Narden, Theo and Farrelly, Dan. Frankfurt/M.: Lang, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. The diversity of human language-structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind. In Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1999. On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species. Ed. by Losonsky, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1913. Logische Untersuchungen II/1: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis. Revised 2nd edn, reprint 1980. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Translated by Carr, David. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical investigations. Volume 2. Translated by Findlay, J. N. from the second German edition of Logische Untersuchungen. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 2010. Cognitive ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science 2, 4: 705–715.Google Scholar

Hutton, Christopher. 2001. Cultural and conceptual relativism, universalism and the politics of linguistics: Dilemmas of a would-be progressive linguistics. In Dirven, René, Hawkins, Bruce W., and Sandikcioglu, Esra (eds.). Language and ideology, vol. 1: Theoretical cognitive approaches. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar

Hübschmann, Heinrich. 1897. Armenische Grammatik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Hartel. Reprint 1972. Hildesheim and New York: Olms.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell (ed.). 1971. Pidginization and creolization of languages. Proceedings of a conference held at the University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica April 1976. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell (ed.). 1972. Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. [Reissued with corrections and additions 1986. Oxford: Blackwell.]Google Scholar

Idström, Ana and Piirainen, Elisabeth (eds). 2012. Endangered metaphors. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Iglesias Ovejero, Ángel. 2003. ¿A qué llamamos apellidos? In Kremer, Dieter (ed.). Miscelânia Patronimiana. Actos do V Colóquio (Lisboa) seguidas das Comunicações do VII Colóquio (Neuchâtel) e de duas Comunicações do VIII Colóquio (București). Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 105–115.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith and Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.). Regimes of language ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, pp. 35–84.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1944. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. In Roman, Jakobson. 1962. Selected writings I: Phonological studies. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 328–401. [English edition 1968: Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton]Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1963. Parts and wholes in language. In Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Selected writings II: Word and language. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 280–284.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar, C. Fant, M., and Halle, Morris. 1969. Preliminaries to speech analysis. The distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2002a. Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Jones, Mari C. and Esch, Edith (eds.). Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–313.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2002b. Do languages die of ‘structuritis’? On the role of code-copying in language endangerment. Rivista di Linguistica 14, 2: 249–270.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2005. On copying grammatical meaning. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 58, 1: 75–83.Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2008. Remodeling grammar. Copying, conventionalization, grammaticalization. In Siemund, Peter and Kintana, Noemi (eds.). Language contact and contact languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 61–79.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. Place, globalization, and linguistic variation. In Fought (ed.), pp. 65–83.Google Scholar

Joseph, John E. and Taylor, Talbot J. (eds). 1990. Ideologies of language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kahane, Henry, Kahane, Renée, and Tietze, Andreas. 1958. The Lingua Franca in the Levant: Turkish nautical terms of Italian and Greek origin. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Robert B. and Baldauf, Richard B.. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Kapoor, Kapil. 1994. Language, linguistics, and literature: The Indian perspective. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar

Karst, Josef. 1901. Historische Grammatik des Kilikisch-Armenischen. Strasbourg: Trübner. Reprint 1970. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Keesing, Roger M. 1988. Melanesian Pidgin and the Oceanic substrate. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kelkar-Stephan, Leena. 2005. Bonjour maa: The French–Tamil language contact situation in India. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar

Keller, Rudi. 1990. Sprachwandel: Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar

Kemp, J. Alan (ed.). 1981. Standard alphabet for reducing unwritten languages and foreign graphic systems to a uniform orthography in European letters. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behaviour in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kibbee, Douglas A. 2003. Language policy and linguistic theory. In Maurais, Jacques and Morris, Michael A. (eds.). Languages in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–57.Google Scholar

Kirsh, David. 1995. The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 73, 1–2: 31–68.Google Scholar

Klee, Carol and Caravedo, Rocío. 2005. Contact-induced language change in Lima, Peru: The case of clitic pronouns. In Eddington, David (ed.). Selected proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. Sommerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar

Kneebone, Heidi-Marie. 2005. The language of the chosen view: The first phase of graphization of Dieri by Hermannsburg missionaries, Lake Killalpaninna 1867–80. Adelaide: Adelaide University.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd (ed.). 2004a. Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd. 2004b. Introduction. In Kortmann (ed.), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd, Burridge, Kate, Meshtrie, Rajend, Schneider, Edgar W., and Upton, Clive (eds.). 2004. A handbook of varieties of English. Vol. 2: Morphology and syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Lunkenheimer, Kerstin. 2013. The Mouton world atlas of variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. Global synopsis – morphological and syntactic variation in English. In Kortmann et al. (eds.), pp. 1142–1202.Google Scholar

Köhler, Wolfgang. 1947. Gestalt Psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar

Kremer, Dieter. 1988a. Tradition und Namengebung. Statistische Anmerkungen zur mittelalterlichen Namengebung. In Ariza, Salvador, and Viudas (eds.), pp. 75–109.Google Scholar

Kremer, Dieter. 1988b. Onomástica e historia de la lengua. In Ariza, Salvador, and Viudas (eds.), pp. 1583–1612.Google Scholar

Kremer, Dieter. 1992. Spanisch: Anthroponomastik. Antroponimia. In Holtus, Günter, Metzeltin, Michael, and Schmitt, Christian (eds.). Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik Bd. VI, 1: Aragonesisch/Navarresisch, Spanisch, Asturianisch/Leonesisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 457–474.Google Scholar

Kriegel, Sibylle, Ludwig, Ralph, and Henri, Fabiola. 2008. Encoding path in Mauritian Creole and Bhojpuri: Problems of language contact. In Michaelis, Susanne (ed.). Roots of creole structures. Weighing the contribution of substrates and superstrates. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar

Kriegel, Sybille, Ludwig, Ralph, and Henri, Fabiola. 2009. Les rapports entre créole et bhojpouri à Maurice: Contact de langues et actes identitaires. In Hookoomsing, Ludwig, and Schnepel (eds.), pp. 203–252.Google Scholar

Kriegel, Sibylle, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan. In Press. Dialectes - créolisation - convergence. Quelques hypothèses à partir du berrichon et du poitevin-saintongeais. In Dufter, Andreas, Grübel, Klaus, and Scharinger, Thomas (eds.). Des parlers d’oïl à la francophonie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kroch, Anthony S. 1978. Toward a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7, 1: 17–36.Google Scholar

Kube, Sabine. 2005. Gelebte Frankophonie in der Côte d’Ivoire. Dimensionen des Sprachphänomens Nouchi und die ivorische Sprachsituation aus der Sicht Abidjaner Schüler. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolution. 2nd edn, enlarged. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Kvaran, Guðrun. 2007. Das isländische Personennamensystem. In Brendler, Andrea and Brendler, Silvio (eds.). Europäische Personennamensysteme. Hamburg: Baar, pp. 310–321.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Laitin, David and Eastman, Carol M.. 1989. Language conflict: Transactions and games in Kenya. Cultural Anthropology 4, 1: 51–72.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Las Casas, Bartolomé de. 1994. Historia de las Indias. Edición de Miguel Angel Medina, Jesús Angel Barreda & Isacio Pérez Fernández. 3 vols. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1997. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2009. Spheres and networks: Two ways to reinterpret globalization. Harvard Design Magazine 30: 138–44.Google Scholar

Laurier, Eric and Philo, Chris. 2006. Natural problems of naturalistic video data. In Knoblauch, Hubert, Raab, Jürgen, Soeffner, Hans-Georg, and Schnettler, Bernt (eds.). Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data in sociology. Bern: Lang, pp. 183–192.Google Scholar

Laycock, Donald C. 1977. Me and you versus the rest. IRIAN 6, 3: 33–41.Google Scholar

LeBaron, Curtis D. and Streeck, Jürgen. 1997. Built space and the interactional framing of experience during a murder interrogation. Human Studies 20: 1–25.Google Scholar

Lechevrel, Nadège. 2010. Les approches écologiques en linguistique: Enquête critique. Louvain-La-Neuve: Academia Bruylant.Google Scholar

Lepsius, C. Richard. 1880. Nubische Grammatik: Mit einer Einleitung über die Völker und Sprachen Afrikas. Berlin: Hertz.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1962. La pensée sauvage. Paris: Librairie Plon.Google Scholar

Lévy, Jacques and Lussault, Michel. 2003. Dictionnaire de la géographie et de l’espace des sociétés. Paris: Éditions Belin.Google Scholar

Liddicoat, Anthony J. and Bryant, Pauline (eds.). 2003. Language planning and economics. Current Issues in Language Planning. Vol 4,1. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Lobo Cabrera, Manuel. 2010. Indígenas canarios, moriscos y negros. In Salinero and Testón Núñez (eds.), pp. 209–219.Google Scholar

Lodge, Anthony. 2004. A sociolinguistic history of Parisian French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lodge, Anthony. 2010. Standardisation, koïnéisation, et l’historiographie du français. Revue de Linguistique Romane 74: 5–25.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1977. Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Munich: DTV.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1989. Umweltgewissen. LP Vienna: CBS Schallplattengesellschaft.Google Scholar

Löffler, Heinrich. 1996. Namen von Freien und Unfreien. In Eichler et al. (eds.), pp. 1296–1300.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 1996. Kreolsprachen zwischen Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Zur Syntax und Pragmatik atlantischer Kreolsprachen auf französischer Basis. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2001. Markiertheit. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf, and Raible, Wolfgang (eds.). Language typology and language universals. An international handbook. Vol. 1. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 400–419.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2002. Urbanidad, migración e hibridación de la lengua: Procesos de contacto en el español de Santiago de Chile. In Díaz, Norma, Ludwig, Ralph, and Pfänder, Stefan (eds.). La Romania americana. Procesos lingüísticos en situaciones de contacto. Frankfurt/M.: Vervuert, pp. 357–386.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2003. Desde el contacto hacia el conflicto lingüístico: El purismo en el español. Concepto, desarrollo histórico y significación actual. Boletín de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 38: 167–196.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2010. Kreolisierung – ein entgrenzter Begriff? In Ludwig and Röseberg (eds.), pp. 93–127.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2014. Synonymie, analogie et métaphore: Rhétorique et cognition au 18^e siècle. In Vallenthini, Michèle, Vincent, Charles, Godel, Rainer (eds.). Classer les mots, classer les choses. Synonymie, analogie et métaphore au XVIII^e siècle. Paris: Garnier Classiques, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph. 2018. Diachronies française et créole: rapports épistémiques. In Ayres-Bennett, Wendy, Carlier, Anne, Glikman, Julie, Rainsford, Thomas M., Siouffi, Gilles, and Dekens, Carine Skupien (eds.). Nouvelles voies d?accès au changement linguistique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, pp. 143–177.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph, Henri, Fabiola, and Bruneau-Ludwig, Florence. 2009. Hybridation linguistique et fonctions sociales: aspects des contacts entre créole, français et anglais à Maurice. In Hookoomsing, Ludwig, and Schnepel (eds.), pp. 165–202.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph and Röseberg, Dorothee (eds.). 2010. Tout-Monde: Interkulturalität – Kreolisierung – Hybridisierung. Gesellschaftstheoretische Modelle zwischen alten und neuen Räumen. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ralph and Schwarze, Sabine. 2006. Die Vorstellung sprachlicher ‘Reinheit’ in der Romania. Von der stilistischen Pragmatik zur Symbolik einer nationalen und supranationalen Kultur. In Schwarze, Sabine and Werner, Edeltraud (eds.). Identitätsbewahrung und Identitätsbegründung durch Sprache. Aktuelle Beiträge zum frankophonen Raum. Hamburg: Kovač, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar

Luff, Paul, Heath, Christian, Kuzuoka, Hideaki, Hindmarsh, Jon, Yamazaki, Keiichi, and Oyama, Shinya. 2003. Fractured ecologies: Creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction 18, 1–2: 51–84.Google Scholar

Luff, Paul, Hindmarsh, Jon, and Heath, Christian (eds.). 2000. Workplace studies. Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lussault, Michel. 2007. L’homme spatial. La construction sociale de l’espace humain. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael. 2002. From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: Comment on Speer. Discourse Studies 4: 531–537.Google Scholar

Lynch, Michael and Bogen, David. 1994. Harvey Sacks’s primitive natural science. Theory, Culture and Society 11 (4): 65–104.Google Scholar

Maalouf, Amin. 1983. Les croisades vues par les Arabes. Paris: Lattès.Google Scholar

Mackey, William F. 1979. Towards an ecology of language contact. In Mackey, William F. and Ornstein, Jacob (eds.). Sociolinguistic studies in language contact: Methods and cases. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 453–459.Google Scholar

Mackey, William F. 1980. The ecology of language shift. First published in Nelde, Peter, H. (ed.). Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 35–41. Quoted from the reprint in Fill and Mühlhäusler (eds.) 2001, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar

McCormick, Kay. 2002. Language in Cape Town’s District Six. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2000. Defining ‘creole’ as a synchronic term. In Neumann-Holzschuh and Schneider (eds.), pp. 85–123.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5: 125–166.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2005. Defining creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2007. Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2008. Our magnificent bastard tongue: The untold history of English. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar

McWhorter, John H. 2011. Language simplicity and complexity. Why do languages undress? Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Maffi, Luisa (ed.). 2001. On biocultural diversity: Linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Makhairas, Leontios. 1932. Recital concerning the sweet land of Cyprus, entitled ‘chronicle’. Ed. Dawkins, Richard M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Makoni, Sinfree and Pennycook, Alastair. 2007. Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron. 2000. Mixed languages: A functional–communicative approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 2: 79–99.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron. 2010. Contact, convergence and typology. In Hickey (ed.), pp. 66–86.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron and Bakker, Peter (eds.). 2003. The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette (eds.). 2007. Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Willi. 1981. Morphologische Natürlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar

Mayerthaler, Eva and Mayerthaler, Willi. 1990. Aspects of Bavarian syntax or ‘every language has at least two parents’. In Edmondson, Feagin, and Mühlhäusler (eds.), pp. 371–430.Google Scholar

Mazeland, Harrie. 2006. Conversation analysis. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 3. 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar

Mazrui, Alamin M. 1995. Slang and code-switching: The case of Sheng in Kenya. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere 42: 168–179.Google Scholar

Mbaabu, Ireri. 1996. Language policy in East Africa: A dependency theory perspective. Nairobi: Educational Research and Publication (ERAP).Google Scholar

Meneses, Max. 2009. Las lenguas que cultivan los migrantes en Lima Metropolitana. In Calvo, Julio and Miranda, Luis (eds.). Palabras fuera del nido. Vertientes sincrónica y diacrónica del español en contacto. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres, pp. 29–65.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, Rajend. 1991. Language in indenture. A sociolinguistic history of Bhojpuri-Hindi in South Africa. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2002. Community of practice. In Chambers, Trudgill, and Schilling-Estes (eds.), pp. 526–548.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2006. Introducing sociolinguistics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Michaelis, Susanne M., Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin, and Huber, Magnus (eds.). 2013. Atlas of pidgin and creole language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [http://apics-online.info, accessed 03 06 2014]Google Scholar

Miller, Jim and Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley. 1993. Real English. The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley and Wei, Li. 1995. A social network approach to code-switching: The example of a bilingual community in Britain. In Milroy, Lesley and Muysken, Pieter (eds.). One speaker two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–157.Google Scholar

Minervini, Laura (ed.). 2000. Cronaca del templare di Tiro (1243–1314). La caduta degli stati crociati nel racconto di un testimone oculare. Naples: Liguori.Google Scholar

Mira Caballos, Esteban. 1997. El indio antillano: Repartimiento, encomienda y esclavitud (1492–1542). Sevilla and Bogotá: Muñoz Moya.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2005a. La constitution de l’origo déictique comme travail interactionnel des participants: Une approche praxéologique de la spatialité. Intellectica 41–42: 75–100.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2005b. Espace, langage, interaction et cognition: Une introduction. Intellectica 41–42: 7–24.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2005c. L’analyse de corpus en linguistique interactionnelle : De l’étude de cas singuliers à l’étude de collections. In Condamine, Anne (ed.). Sémantique et corpus. Paris: Hermès, pp. 76–108.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2006a. Video recording as the reflexive preservation of fundamental features for analysis. In Knoblauch, Hubert, Raab, Jürgen, Soeffner, Hans-Georg, and Schnettler, Bernt (eds.). Video analysis: Methodology and methods. Qualitative audiovisual data in sociology. Bern: Lang, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2006b. La question du contexte en ethnométhodologie et en analyse conversationnelle. Verbum 28, 2–3: 111–151.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies 9, 2: 195–226.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1977–1997.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. The interactional production of multiple spatialities within participatory democracy meetings. Social Semiotics 21, 2: 283–308.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2013a. Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction. In Auer, Peter, Hilpert, Martin, Stukenbrock, Anja, and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds). Space in language and linguistics: Geographical, interactional and cognitive perspectives. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 246–273.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2013b. Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: The example of participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 46: 39–68.Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2013c. The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In Sidnell, Jack and Stivers, Tanya (eds.). The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 32–56.Google Scholar

Morales Pettorino, Félix, Mejías, Oscar Quiroz, and José, Juan Alvarez, Peña. 1984–1987. Diccionario ejemplificado de chilenismos y otros usos diferenciales del español de Chile. Vols. I–IV. Valparaíso: Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación.Google Scholar

Moreau, Marie-Louise (ed.). 1997. Sociolinguistique: Les concepts de base. Sprimont: Mardaga.Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike. 1980. Tolai and Tok Pisin: The influence of the substratum on the development of New Guinea Pidgin. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University for the Linguistic Circle of Canberra.Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike. 1982. Local deixis in Tolai. In Weissenborn, Jürgen and Klein, Wolfgang (eds.). Here and there: Cross-linguistic studies in deixis and demonstration. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 111–132.Google Scholar

Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2009. Atlas of the world’s languages in danger. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Mougeon, Raymond, Nadasdi, Terry, and Rehner, Katherine. 2005. Contact-induced linguistic innovations on the continuum of language use: The case of French in Ontario. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8, 2: 99–115.Google Scholar

Msimang, Christian Themba. 1987. Impact of Zulu on Tsotsitaal. South African Journal of African Languages 7:3, 82–86.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1994. On decreolization: The case of Gullah. In Morgan, Marcyliena (ed.). Language and the social construction of identity in creole situations. Los Angeles: Center for Afro-American Studies, pp. 63–99.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 1996. The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica XIII-1: 83–134.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2000. Creolization is a social, not a structural process. In Neumann-Holzschuh and Schneider (eds.), pp. 65–84.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2001. The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2003. Genetic linguistics and genetic creolistics: A response to Sarah G. Thomason’s ‘Creoles and genetic relationships’. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 8, 2: 273–288.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2005. Créoles, écologie sociale, évolution linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2008. Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2009. Some offspring of colonial English are creole. In Filppula, Klemola, and Paulasto (eds.), pp. 280–303.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2014. Language ecology, language evolution, and the actuation question. In Afarli, Tor and Maelhum, Brit (eds.). Language contact and change: Grammatical structure encounters the fluidity of language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar

Mufwene, Salikoko S. and Vigouroux, Cécile B.. 2012. Individuals, populations, and timespace: Perspectives on the ecology of language. Cahiers de Linguistique: Revue de Sociolinguistique et de Sociologie de la Langue Française 38, 2: 111–137.Google Scholar

Municipalidad Distrital de Los Olivos. 2006. Webpage of the Los Olivos City Hall: www.munilosolivos.gob.pe/comentarios.htm (last access April 2013)Google Scholar

Munteanu, Dan. 1997. Notas sobre el léxico de orígen español en chamorro. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 12: 959–974.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1981. Halfway between Quechua and Spanish: The case for relexification. In Highfield, Arnold and Valdman, Albert (eds.). Historicity and variation in creole studies. Ann Arbor: Karoma, pp. 52–78.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1994. Media Lengua. In Bakker and Mous (eds.), pp. 207–211.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 1997. Media Lengua. In Thomason, Sarah G. (ed.). Contact languages: A wider perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 365–426.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1982. Etymology and pidgin and creole languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 80, 1: 99–118.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1986. Pidgin & creole linguistics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1995a. The interdependence of linguistic and biological diversity. In Myers, David (ed.). The politics of multiculturalism in Oceania and Polynesia. Darwin: University of the Northern Territory Press, pp. 154–161.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1995b. Metaphors others live by. Language and Communication 15, 3: 281–288.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996a. Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996b. Linguistic adaptation to changed environmental conditions: Some lessons from the past. In Fill, Alwin (ed.). Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 105–130.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996c. Introduction to: Charles-James N. Bailey. Essays on time-based linguistic analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996d. Ecological and non-ecological approaches to language planning. In Hellinger, Marlis and Ammon, Ulrich (eds.). Contrastive sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 205–212.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2000a. Humboldt, Whorf and the roots of ecolinguistics. In Pütz, Martin and Versporr, Marjolijn H. (eds.). Explorations in linguistic relativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2000b. Language rights for the language of Norfolk Island. In Phillipson (ed.), pp. 79–82.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2002. Language as an ecological phenomenon. The Linacre Journal: A Review of Research in the Humanities 5: 61–68.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2003. Language of environment, environment of language: A course in ecolinguistics. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2005. Review of Mufwene ‘The ecology of language evolution’ (2001). Language 81: 265–268.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2006. Naming languages, drawing language boundaries and maintaining languages, with special reference to the linguistic situation in Papua New Guinea. In Cunningham, Denis, Ingram, David E., and Sumbuk, Kenneth (eds.). Language diversity in the Pacific: Endangerment and survival. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 24–39.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2008. Multifunctionality in Pitkern-Norf'k and Tok Pisin. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 39: 75–113.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter. 2012. The complexity of the personal and possessive pronoun system of Norfolk. In Kortmann, Bernd and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (eds.). Linguistic complexity. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 101–126.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Damania, Richard. 2004. Economic costs and benefits of Australian indigenous languages. Discussion Paper, Canberra, Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA).Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter, Dutton, Tom, Hovdhaugen, Even, Williams, Jeff, and Wurm, Stephen A.. 1996. Pre-colonial patterns of intercultural communication in the Pacific Islands. In Wurm, Stephen A., Mühlhäusler, Peter, and Tryon, Darrell T. (eds.). Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 401–438.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mühlhäusler, Peter and Peace, Adrian J.. 2006. Environmental discourses. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 457–479.Google Scholar

Müller, F. Max. 1862. Lectures on the science of language. From the 2nd London edn, revised. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar

Müller, F. Max. 1902. The life and letters of the Right Honourable Friedrich Max Müller. Edited by his wife. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993. Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2003. What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena. In Matras and Bakker (eds.), pp. 73–106.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2006a. Multiple voices. An introduction to bilingualism. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2006b. How code-switching as an available option empowers bilinguals. In Pütz, Martin, Fishman, Joshua A., and Aertselaer, JoAnne Neff-van (eds.). ‘Along the routes to power’. Explorations of empowerment through language. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Náñez Fernández, Emilio. 1973. El diminutivo. Historia y funciones en el español clásico y moderno. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar

Nash, Joshua. 2011. Insular toponymies: Pristine place naming on Norfolk Island, South Pacific and Dudley Peninsula, Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar

Neumann-Holzschuh, Ingrid and Schneider, Edgar W. (eds.). 2000. Degrees of restructuring in creole languages. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David, and Rodrigues, Cilene. 2009a. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85, 2: 355–404.Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David, and Rodrigues, Cilene. 2009b. Evidence and argumentation: A reply to Everett. Language 85, 3: 671–681.Google Scholar

Nickel, Gerhard. 1990. Some problems of teaching English in Japan. In Edmondson, Feagin and Mühlhäusler (eds.), pp. 647–662.Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 2010. Genetic classification and language contact. In Hickey (ed.), pp. 48–65.Google Scholar

Nurse, Derek and Hinnebusch, Thomas J. 1993. Swahili and Sabaki: A linguistic history. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Oberlies, Thomas. 2005. A historical grammar of Hindi. Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1979. Planned and unplanned discourse. In Givon, Talmy (ed.). Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 51–80.Google Scholar

Odo, Carol. 1972. A survey of language use and attitudes on Guam. Agaña: Guam Department of Education.Google Scholar

Onedera, Peter R. 2011a. Chamoru kontra Chamorro. Guam Pacific Daily News 02/01/2011.Google Scholar

Onedera, Peter R. 2011b. Bula kinalamten gi i mes Chamorro. Guam Pacific Daily News 02/15/2011.Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2015. Contact-genetic linguistics: Toward a contact-based theory of language change. Language Sciences 48: 1–15.Google Scholar

Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF), Conseil Consultatif. 2007. La Francophonie dans le monde 2006–2007. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF), Conseil Consultatif. 2010. La langue française dans le monde. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar

Orlove, Benjamin. 1993. Putting race in its place: Order in colonial and postcolonial Peruvian geography. Social Research 60, 2: 301–36.Google Scholar

Ortaylı, Ilber. 1999. Greeks in the Ottoman administration during the Tanzimat period. In Gondicas, Dimitri and Issawi, Charles P. (eds.), Ottoman Greeks in the age of nationalism: Politics, economy, and society in the nineteenth century. Princeton: Darwin Press, pp. 161–167.Google Scholar

Ortony, Andrew (ed.). 1979. Metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ozanne-Rivierre, Francoise. 1997. Spatial reference in New Caledonian languages. In Senft (ed.), pp. 83–100.Google Scholar

Pagel, Steve. 2008. The old, the new and the in-between: Comparative aspects of Hispanisation on the Marianas and Easter Island (Rapa Nui). In Stolz, Bakker and Salas Palomo (eds.), pp. 167–201.Google Scholar

Pagel, Steve. 2010. Spanisch in Asien und Ozeanien. Frankfurt/M.: Lang.Google Scholar