Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:15:39.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - A first look at cohomology of groups and related topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2010

Josi A. de Azcárraga
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Josi M. Izquierdo
Affiliation:
Universitat de València, Spain
Get access

Summary

This chapter is devoted to providing a physical motivation for group cohomology and group extensions by analysing some specific features of classical and quantum mechanics of non-relativistic particles. In particular the need of considering projective representations of the Galilei group and Bargmann's superselection rule are discussed. The projective representations lead to the introduction of two-cocycles; the three-cocycle appears as a result of a consistent breach of associativity. The consistency conditions that have to be fulfilled in both cases are analysed, and illustrated in the case of two-cocycles with the examples of the Weyl-Heisenberg group and the Galilei group. All these concepts will be mathematically defined in chapters 4, 5, and 6, and addressed again in a more elaborate way from the point of view of classical physics in chapter 8.

The relation between cohomology and quantization and in particular the topics of symplectic cohomology, dynamical groups and geometric quantization are briefly treated in this chapter. Again, the Galilei and the Weyl-Heisenberg groups will be used as illustrations of the theory.

Finally, it is shown how the group contraction procedure can generate non-trivial group cohomology.

Some known facts of ‘non-relativistic’ mechanics: two-cocycles

A theory is called ‘non-relativistic’ if its formulation is covariant under the Galilei group G, which is the relativity group of a ‘non-relativistic’ theory. It should be noticed, however, that theories covariant under the Poincare group and the Galilei group are both, strictly speaking, equally relativistic; only their relativity group is different.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×