We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from PART I - PUBLIC AUTHORITY LIABILITY OUTLINED
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 November 2017
INTRODUCTION
OVERVIEW
The application of private law rules against the State or, in more precise terms, public administrations, is historically an issue widely debated in Italian law.
This topic can be read along the lines of two dichotomies, that is between civil law and administrative law, on the one hand, and between the jurisdiction of ordinary courts and the jurisdiction of administrative courts, on the other.
With reference to the former, at the end of the nineteenth century, the legal literature was divided between the thesis concerning the applicability of the rules of private law to public administrations and the opposite reconstruction according to which the logic of private law was not suited to solve the problems of administrative activities, including those arising from participation in an illegal activity by a public administration.
The application of ius priva torum sprang from the idea, prevalent at that time, of the supremacy of the civil code. On the other hand, it was precisely the wider range of legal relations of public administrations that induced the idea of dismissing the centrality of the Civil Code and of its ability to provide exhaustive answers to the needs of justice originating from society.
With the aim of avoiding the possible creation of spheres of privilege or immunity for various public administrations, the application of the general rules of private law was advanced as a solution. Still to this day however, we have to admit that the issues concerning which rules to apply in such situations has not been fully resolved.
The nature of the general clause of art 2043 of the Civil Code (CC) is generally agreed upon and therefore attempts to establish the liability of the public administration beyond the boundaries of the Civil Code have not been successful. Nevertheless, the fact that the Italian legal system is based on the distinction, unknown in most other legal systems, between diritti soggettivi (‘legal rights’ which are vested rights typically applicable to juridical relations between individuals) and interessi legittimi (‘legitimate interests’, ie the typical legal protection granted to each citizen against the public administration) blocked, until 1999, full protection against the public administration.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
