Adshead, J, ‘The Application and Development of the Polluter-Pays Principle across Jurisdictions in Liability for Marine Oil Pollution: The Tales of the “Erika” and the “Prestige”’ (2018) 30 JEL 425Google Scholar

Aguon, J and Hunter, J, ‘Second Wave Due Diligence: The Case for Incorporating Free, Prior and Informed Consent into the Deep Seabed Mining Regulatory Regime’ (2019) 38 Stan Envtl L J 3Google Scholar

Albers, J, Responsibility and Liability in the Context of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes by Sea (Springer-Verlag 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, J, ‘Points of Law’ in Payne, Cymie and Sand, Peter (eds), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Claims (OUP 2011) 141Google Scholar

Ameye, EM, ‘United States and India: Two Nuclear States with Legislation that Truly Holds Responsible Parties Liable in Case of a Nuclear Accident’ (2015) 18(8) Journal of Risk Research 1070Google Scholar

Anderson, C and de la Rue, C, ‘The Role of the P&I Clubs in Maritime Pollution Incidents’ (2011) 85 Tul L Rev 1257Google Scholar

Anton, D, ‘The Principle of Residual Liability in the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Advisory Opinion on Responsibility and Liability for International Seabed Mining (ITLOS Case No. 17)’ (2012) 7(2) JSDLP-RDPDD 241Google Scholar

Badia, A, Piercing the Veil of State Enterprises in International Arbitration (Wolters Kluwer 2014)Google Scholar

Bailey, SH and Bowman, MJ, ‘The Policy/Operational Dichotomy – A Cuckoo in the Nest’ (1986) 45(3) CLJ 430Google Scholar

Barboza, J, The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law (Brill 2011)Google Scholar

Barrett, J, ‘The Antarctic Treaty System’ in Scott, Karen N and VanderZwaag, David L (eds), Research Handbook on Polar Law (Edward Elgar 2020) 40Google Scholar

Baslar, K, The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 1998)Google Scholar

Bentata, P and Faure, M, ‘The Role of ENGOs in Environmental Litigation: A French Case Study’ (2015) 25 EPG 459Google Scholar

Bergkamp, L, Liability and Environment: Private and Public Law Aspects of Civil Liability for Environmental Harm in an International Context (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar

Berry, DS, ‘Unity or Fragmentation in the Deep Blue: Choices in Institutional Design for Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2021) 8 Front Mar Sci 1Google Scholar

Birnie, P, Boyle, A and Redgwell, C, International Law and the Environment (4th edn, OUP 2021)Google Scholar

Blokker, N, ‘International Organizations: The Untouchables?’ (2013) 10 Int Organ Law Rev 259Google Scholar

Blokker, N, ‘International Organizations or Institutions, Implied Powers’ (last updated December 2021) in Anne Peters and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2008)Google Scholar

Blum, J, The End of the Old Order in Rural Europe (Princeton University Press 1978)Google Scholar

Blumm, M and Guthrie, R, ‘Internationalizing the Public Trust Doctrine: Natural Law and Constitutional and Statutory Approaches to Fulfilling the Saxion Vision’ (2012) 45 UC Davis L Rev 741Google Scholar

Boon, KE, ‘Are Control Tests Fit for the Future? The Spillage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 MJIL 1Google Scholar

Bosselmann, K, Earth Governance: Trusteeship of the Global Commons (Edward Elgar 2015)Google Scholar

Bourrel, M, Thiele, T and Currie, D, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind as a Means to Assess and Advance Equity in Deep Sea Mining’ (2018) 95 Mar Pol’y 311Google Scholar

Bowman, M and Boyle, A (eds), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation (OUP 2002)Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘State Responsibility and Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts Not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 ICLQ 1Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction’ (1997) 46(1) ICLQ 37Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘Remedying Harm to International Common Spaces and Resources: Compensation and Other Approaches’ in Wetterstein, Peter (ed), Harm to the Environment: The Right to Compensation and Assessment of Damages (OUP 1997) 83Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘Reparation for Environmental Damage in International Law: Some Preliminary Problems’ in Bowman, Michael and Boyle, Alan (eds), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation (OUP 2002) 17Google Scholar

Boyle, A, ‘Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law’ (2005) 17 JEL 3Google Scholar

Brans, E, Liability for Damage to Public Natural Resources: Standing, Damage and Damage Assessment (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar

Brent, K, ‘Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Strict Liability for Ultrahazardous Activities’ in Craik, Neil, Jefferies, Cameron SG, Seck, Sara L and Stephens, Tim (eds), Global Environmental Change and Innovation in International Law (CUP 2018) 161Google Scholar

Brondizio, ES, Settele, J, Díaz, S and Ngo, HT (eds), Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat 2019)Google Scholar

Brown, ED, The Area beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction: Sea-Bed Energy and Mineral Resources and Law of the Sea (Martinus Nijhoff 1986) vol IIGoogle Scholar

Brunnée, J, ‘Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on Environmental Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection’ (2004) 53 ICLQ 351Google Scholar

Buck, S, The Global Commons: An Introduction (Island Press 2012)Google Scholar

Burdon, P and Williams, C, ‘Rights of Nature: A Constructive Analysis’ in Fisher, Douglas (ed), Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2016) 196Google Scholar

Burmester, HC, ‘Liability for Damage from Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities’ (1989) 29 Va J Int’l L 621Google Scholar

Buxbaum, H, ‘Foreign Governments as Plaintiffs in U.S. Courts and the Case against “Judicial Imperialism”’ (2016) 73 Wash Lee L Rev 653Google Scholar

Calabresi, G and Melamed, AD, ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harv L Rev 1089Google Scholar

Chao, W, Pollution from the Carriage of Oil by Sea: Liability and Compensation (Kluwer Law International 1996)Google Scholar

Charme, J, ‘Transnational Injury and Ultra-hazardous Activity: An Emerging Norm of International Strict Liability’ (1989) 4 J L & Tech 75Google Scholar

Chinkin, C and Mackenzie, R, ‘Intergovernmental Organizations as “Friends of Courts”’ in de Chazournes, Laurence Boisson, Romano, Cesare PR and Mackenzie, Ruth (eds), International Organisations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects (Brill 2002) 135Google Scholar

Chow, PY, ‘On Obligations Erga Omnes Partes’ (2021) 52 Geo J Int’l L 469Google Scholar

Churchill, R, ‘Facilitating (Transnational) Civil Liability Litigation for Environmental Damage by Means of Treaties: Progress, Problems, and Prospects’ (2001) 12 Yrbk Int’l Env Law 3Google Scholar

Churchill, R and Ulfstein, G, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94(4) AJIL 623Google Scholar

Collins, R and French, D, ‘A Guardian of Universal Interest or Increasingly Out of Its Depth? The International Seabed Authority Turns 25’ (2019) 17(3) Int Org Law Rev 1Google Scholar

Convey, P and Peck, LS, ‘Antarctic Environmental Change and Biological Responses’ (2019) 5 Science Advances 11Google Scholar

Craik, N, ‘Recalcitrant Reality and Chosen Ideals: The Public Function of Dispute Settlement in International Environmental Law’ (1997) 10 Geo Int’l Envtl L Rev 551Google Scholar

Crawford, J, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (CUP 2002)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, ‘State Responsibility’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (OUP September 2006)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, State Responsibility (CUP 2013)Google Scholar

Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (9th edn, OUP 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Creutz, K, State Responsibility in the International Legal Order: A Critical Appraisal (CUP 2020)Google Scholar

Daugirdas, K, ‘How and Why International Law Binds International Organizations’ (2016) 57 Harv Intl L J 325Google Scholar

Davenport, T, ‘Responsibility and Liability for Damage Arising Out of Activities in the Area: Potential Claimants and Possible Fora’ (Legal Working Group on Liability for Environmental Harm from Activities in the Area, Liability Issues for Deep Seabed Mining Series, Paper No 5, February 2019)Google Scholar

de La Fayette, L, ‘The Concept of Environmental Damage in International Liability Regimes’ in Bowman, Michael and Boyle, Alan (eds), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation (OUP 2002) 149Google Scholar

de La Fayette, L, ‘International Liability for Damage to the Environment’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M and Merkouris, Panos (eds), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010) 320Google Scholar

de Smedt, K, Wang, H and Faure, M, ‘Towards Optimal Liability and Compensation for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities’ in Faure, Michael (ed), Civil Liability and Financial Security for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities (CUP 2016)Google Scholar

Doeker, G and Gehring, T, ‘Private or International Liability for Transnational Environmental Damage – The Precedent of Conventional Liability Regimes’ (1990) 2(1) JEL 1Google Scholar

Doelle, M and Seck, S, ‘Introducing Loss and Damage’ in Doelle, Meinhard and Seck, Sara (eds), Research Handbook on Climate Change Loss and Damage (Edward Elgar 2021) 1Google Scholar

Dubois, SM and Mayer, B, ‘Liability and Compensation for Marine Plastic Pollution: Conceptual Issues and Possible Ways Forward’ (2020) 114 AJIL Unbound 206Google Scholar

Duvic-Paoli, L, The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law (CUP 2018)Google Scholar

Elliot, L, International Environmental Politics: Protecting the Antarctic (Palgrave MacMillan 1994)Google Scholar

Ellis, J, ‘Extraterritorial Excuse of Jurisdiction for Environmental Protection: Addressing Fairness Concerns’ (2012) 25 LJIL 397Google Scholar

Evans, M, ‘Parens Patriae and Public Trust: Litigating Environmental Harm Per Se’ (2016) 12(1) MJSDL 1Google Scholar

Fasia, E, ‘No Provision Left Behind – Law of the Sea Convention’s Dispute Settlement System and Obligations Erga Omnes’ (2021) 20 LPICT 519Google Scholar

Fasoli, E, ‘The Possibilities for Nongovernmental Organizations Promoting Environmental Protection to Claim Damages in Relation to the Environment in France, Italy, the Netherlands and Portugal’ (2017) 26(1) RECIEL 30Google Scholar

Faure, M, ‘Attribution of Liability: An Economic Analysis of Various Cases’ (2016) 91(2) Chi-Kent L Rev 603Google Scholar

Faure, M (ed), Civil Liability and Financial Security for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities (CUP 2016)Google Scholar

Faure, M and Vanden Borre, T, ‘Compensating Nuclear Damage: A Comparative Economic Analysis of the US and International Liability Schemes’ (2008) 33 Wm & Mary Envtl L & Pol’y Rev 219Google Scholar

Faure, M, Jing, L and Wang, H, ‘Analysis of Existing Regimes’ in Faure, Michael (ed), Civil Liability and Financial Security for Offshore Oil and Gas Activities (CUP 2016) 68Google Scholar

Feichtner, I, ‘Community Interests’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (OUP 2007)Google Scholar

Feldthusen, B, ‘Public Authority Immunity from Negligence Liability: Uncertain, Unnecessary, and Unjustified’ (2014) 92(2) Can Bar Rev 211Google Scholar

Ferreira, PG, ‘Arrested Development: The Late and Inequitable Integration of Loss and Damage Finance into the UNFCCC’ in Doelle, Meinhard and Seck, Sara (eds), Research Handbook on Climate Law and Loss and Damage (Edward Elgar 2021) 127Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Liability for Environmental Damage Caused to the Global Commons’ (1996) 5 RECIEL 305Google Scholar

Fleming, JG, ‘Probabilistic Causation in Tort Law’ (1989) 68(4) Can Bar Rev 661Google Scholar

Foster, C, ‘The ILC Draft Principles on the Allocation of Loss in the Case of Transboundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities: Privatizing Risk?’ (2005) 14 RECIEL 265Google Scholar

Foster, C, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality (CUP 2011)Google Scholar

Foster, C, ‘New Clothes for the Emperor? Consultation of Experts by the International Court of Justice’ (2014) 5 JIDS 139Google Scholar

Fox, H and Webb, P, The Law of State Immunity (3rd edn, OUP 2015)Google Scholar

Freestone, D, ‘International Governance, Responsibility and Management of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction’ (2012) 27 IJMCL 191Google Scholar

Fry, J, ‘Attribution of Responsibility’ in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), Principles of Shared Responsibility in International Law (CUP 2014)Google Scholar

Gahlen, S, Civil Liability for Accidents at Sea (Springer-Verlag 2015)Google Scholar

Gaskell, N, ‘Compensation for Offshore Pollution: Ships and Platforms’ in Clarke, Malcolm (ed), Maritime Law Evolving (Hart Publishing 2013) 63Google Scholar

Gaskell, N, ‘Liability and Compensation Regimes: Pollution of the High Seas’ in Beckman, Robert, McCreath, Millicent, Roach, J Ashley and Sun, Zhen (eds), High Seas Governance: Gaps and Challenges (Brill 2019) 229Google Scholar

Glasby, GP, ‘Deep Seabed Mining: Past Failures and Future Prospects’ (2002) 20(2) Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 161Google Scholar

Goldie, LFE, ‘Liability for Damage and the Progressive Development of International Law’ (1965) 14(4) ICLQ 1189Google Scholar

Goldie, LFE, ‘Concepts of Strict and Absolute Liability and the Ranking of Liability in Terms of Relative Exposure to Risk’ (1985) 16 NYIL 175Google Scholar

Handl, G, ‘Liability as an Obligation Established by a Primary Rule of International Law: Some Basic Reflections on the International Law Commission’s Work’ (1985) 16 NYIL 49Google Scholar

Handl, G, ‘Marine Environmental Damage: The Compensability of Ecosystem Service Loss in International Law’ (2019) 34 IJMCL 602Google Scholar

Hanley, N, ‘The Economic Valuation of Environmental Damage’ in Bowman, Michael and Boyle, Alan (eds), Environmental Damage in International and Comparative Law: Problems of Definition and Valuation (OUP 2002) 27Google Scholar

Harden-Davies, H and others, ‘Rights of Nature: Perspectives for Global Ocean Stewardship’ (2020) 122 Mar Pol’y 104059Google Scholar

Harpwood, VH, Modern Tort Law (7th edn, Routledge-Cavendish 2008)Google Scholar

Harrison, J, ‘The Law of the Sea Convention Institutions’ in Rothwell, Donald R, Oude Elferink, Alex G, Scott, Karen N and Stephens, Tim (eds), Oxford Handbook on the Law of the Sea (OUP 2014) 373Google Scholar

Harrison, J, ‘Key Challenges Relating to the Governance of Regional Fisheries’ in Caddell, Richard and Molenaar, Erik J (eds), Strengthening International Fisheries Law in an Era of Changing Oceans (Hart Publishing 2019) 79Google Scholar

Harrison, J, ‘Checks and Balances on the Regulatory Powers of the International Seabed Authority’ in Herrera, A Ascencio and Nordquist, MH (eds), The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Part XI Regime and the International Seabed Authority: A Twenty-Five Year Journey (Brill 2022) 151Google Scholar

Heller, K, ‘Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112(2) AJIL 191Google Scholar

Hemmings, A, ‘Liability Postponed: The Failure to Bring Annex VI of the Madrid Protocol into Force’ (2018) 8(2) Polar J 315Google Scholar

Hinteregger, M, ‘Environmental Liability’ in Lees, Emma and Viñuales, Jorge E (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law (OUP 2019) 1025Google Scholar

Hoyt, S, Van Dover, C, Smith, S and Pendleton, L, ‘Closing the Liability Gap: A Review of Liability Alternatives for the Emerging Seafloor Mineral Extraction Industry’ (2016) <https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/11881/MP_FINAL.pdf?sequence=1>>Google Scholar

Huguenin, M, Donlan, M, van Geel, A and Paterson, R, ‘Assessment and Valuation of Damage to the Environment’ in Payne, Cymie and Sand, Peter (eds), Gulf War Reparations and the UN Compensation Commission: Environmental Claims (OUP 2011) 67Google Scholar

Hylton, K, Tort Law: A Modern Perspective (CUP 2016)Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (CUP 2019)Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (CUP 2022)Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A, Ardron, J and Gjerde, K, ‘Sharing Benefits of the Common Heritage of Mankind – Is the Deep Seabed Mining Regime Ready?’ (2016) 70 Mar Pol’y 198Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A, The International Seabed Authority and the Precautionary Principle: Balancing Deep Seabed Mineral Mining and Marine Environmental Protection (Brill 2017)Google Scholar

Jaeckel, A, Gjerde, K and Ardron, J, ‘Conserving the Common Heritage of Humankind – Options for the Deep Seabed Mining Regime’ (2017) 78 Mar Pol’y 150Google Scholar

Jarrett, M, Contributory Fault and Investor Misconduct in Investment Arbitration (CUP 2019)Google Scholar

Jenks, CW, ‘The Scope and Nature of Ultra-Hazardous Liability in International Law’ (1968) 117 Recueil de Cours 99Google Scholar

Johnson, M, ‘Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica: The Adoption of Annex VI to the Antarctic Environmental Protocol’ (2006) 19(1) Geo Int’l Envtl L Rev 33Google Scholar

Joyner, C C, ‘Legal Implications of the Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ (1986) 35(1) ICLQ 190Google Scholar

Joyner, C, ‘The Antarctic Legal Regime: An Introduction’ in Joyner, Christopher C and Chopra, Sudhir K (eds), The Antarctic Legal Regime (Martinus Nijhoff 1988) 2Google Scholar

Joyner, C, Governing the Frozen Commons: The Antarctic Regime and Environmental Protection (University of South Carolina Press 1998)Google Scholar

Kees, A, ‘Responsibility of States for Private Actors’ in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law Online (OUP 2011)Google Scholar

Kindje, K and Faure, M, ‘Assessing Reparation of Environmental Damage by the ICJ: A Lost Opportunity?’ (2019) 57 QILJ 5Google Scholar

Klabbers, J, ‘Formal Intergovernmental Organizations’ in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds), The Oxford Handbook on International Organizations (OUP 2016) 133Google Scholar

Klein, P, ‘Responsibility’ in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds), The Oxford Handbook on International Organizations (OUP 2016) 1026Google Scholar

Laidlaw, AK and Kang, S, ‘The Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Major Multilateral Treaties’ NUS Centre for International Law Working Paper 18/02 (2018) <https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/NUS-CIL-Working-Paper-1802-The-Dispute-Settlement-Mechanisms-in-Major-Multilateral-Treaties.pdf>>Google Scholar

Lanovoy, V, ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2022) British Yearbook Intl L 1Google Scholar

Lefeber, R, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the Origin of State Liability (Kluwer Law International 1996)Google Scholar

Lefeber, R, ‘The Liability Provisions of Regional Seas Conventions: Dead Letters in the Sea?’ in Vidas, Davor and Østreng, Willy (eds), Order for the Ocean at the Turn of the Century (Kluwer Law International 1999) 507Google Scholar

Leigh, K, ‘Liability for Damage to the Global Commons’ (1992) 14 Aust YBIL 129Google Scholar

Levin, L and others, ‘Defining “Serious Harm” to the Marine Environment in the Context of Deep-Seabed Mining’ (2016) 74 Mar Pol’y 245Google Scholar

Levin, L, Amon, D and Lily, H, ‘Challenges to the Sustainability of Deep Seabed Mining’ (2020) 3 Nature Sustainability 784Google Scholar

Lijnzaad, L, ‘Dispute Settlement for Marine Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction: Not an Afterthought’ in Fabri, Helene Ruiz, Franckx, Erik, Benatar, Marco and Meshel, Tamar (eds), A Bridge over Troubled Waters: Dispute Resolution in the Law of International Watercourses and the Law of the Sea (Brill 2020)Google Scholar

Loan, J, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind in Antarctica: An Analysis in Light of the Threats Posed by Climate Change’ (2004) 1 NZ Yearbook Intl L 149Google Scholar

Lodge, M, ‘The Common Heritage of Mankind’ (2012) 27 IJMCL 733Google Scholar

Lohan, D and Johnston, S, Bioprospecting in Antarctica (UNU-IAS 2005) <www.cbd.int/financial/bensharing/g-absantarctic.pdf>Google Scholar

Long, R, ‘Restoring Marine Environmental Damage: Can the Costa Rica v Nicaragua Compensation Case Influence the BBNJ Negotiations?’ (2019) 28 RECIEL 244Google Scholar

Long, R and Sun, Z (eds), Workshop Report: Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction: Towards the Development of a Balanced, Effective and Universal International Agreement (World Maritime University 2020)Google Scholar

Mace, MJ and Verheyen, R, ‘Loss, Damage and Responsibility after COP21: All Options Open for the Paris Agreement’ (2016) 25 RECIEL 197Google Scholar

Mackenzie, R, Romano, C, Shany, Y and Sands, P, The Manual on International Courts and Tribunals (2nd edn, OUP 2010)Google Scholar

Malintoppi, L, ‘Methods of Dispute Resolution in Inter-state Litigation – When States Go to Arbitration Rather than Adjudication’ (2006) 5 LPICT 133Google Scholar

Malintoppi, L, ‘Fact-Finding and Evidence before the International Court of Justice (Notably in Scientific-Related Disputes)’ (2016) 7 JIDS 421Google Scholar

Marjanac, S and Patton, L, ‘Extreme Weather Event Attribution Science and Climate Change Litigation: An Essential Step in the Causal Change’ (2018) 36 (3) J Energy Nat Resources Law 265Google Scholar

McCamus, J, ‘Necessitous Intervention: The Altruistic Intermeddler and the Law of Restitution’ (1979) 11 Ottawa L Rev 297Google Scholar

Messineo, F, ‘The Invocation of Member State Responsibility before National and International Courts’ (2015) 12 Int Org Law Rev 484Google Scholar

Mickelson, K, ‘Rereading Trail Smelter’ (1994) 31 Canadian YBIL 219Google Scholar

Minnerop, P and Friederike, O, ‘Climate Change and Causation: Joining Law and Climate Science on the Basis of Formal Logic’ (2019) 27 Buff Env L J 49Google Scholar

Mitchell, C and Swadling, W (eds), Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (Bloomsbury Publishing 2013)Google Scholar

Mollengarden, Z and Zamir, N, ‘The Monetary Gold Principle: Back to Basics’ (2021) 115(1) AJIL 41Google Scholar

Morrison, J, ‘Global Approval Not Enough, Businesses Need Social License’ (2014) YaleGlobal Online <https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/government-approval-not-enough-businesses-need-social-license>>Google Scholar

Musiker, D, France, T and Hallenbeck, L, ‘The Public Trust and Parens Patriae Doctrines: Protecting Wildlife in Uncertain Political Times’ (1995) 16 Pub Land L Rev 87Google Scholar

Nandan, S, Lodge, MW and Rosenne, S (eds), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol VI (Brill 2002)Google Scholar

Nigar, M, ‘Environmental Liability and Global Commons: A Critical Study’ (2018) 60(2) IJLMA 435Google Scholar

Niner, H. and others, ‘Deep-sea mining with no net loss of biodiversity—an impossible aim’ (2018) 5 Front Mar Sci 53Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A, ‘Internationally Wrongful Acts in Domestic Courts’ (2007) 101(4) AJIL 760Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A and Jacobs, D, ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2013) 34 Mich J Intl L 359Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, A and others, ‘Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility in International Law’ (2020) 31 EJIL 15Google Scholar

Nordquist, MH, Rosenne, S and Sohn, L, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol V (Martinus Nijhoff 1989)Google Scholar

Okowa, P, State Responsibility for Transboundary Air Pollution in International Law (OUP 2000)Google Scholar

Okowa, P, ‘Responsibility for Environmental Damage’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M and Merkouris, Panos (eds), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010) 303Google Scholar

Oral, N, ‘The South China Sea Arbitral Award, Part XII of UNCLOS and the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment’ in Jayakumar, S, Koh, Tommy, Beckman, Robert, Davenport, Tara and Duy Phan, Hao (eds), The South China Sea Arbitration: The Legal Dimension (Edward Elgar 2018) 223Google Scholar

Ostrom, E, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (CUP 1990)Google Scholar

Orlando, E, ‘From Domestic to Global? Recent Trends in Environmental Liability from a Multilevel and Comparative Law Perspective’ (2015) 24(3) RECIEL 289Google Scholar

Owens, J, ‘Comparative Law and Standing to Sue: A Petition for Redress for the Environment’ (2001) 7 Envtl Law 321Google Scholar

Pala, C, ‘Can Mining the Seabed Help save the Planet?’ Foreign Policy, 7 November 2021 <https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/11/07/seabed-mining-marine-life-climate-change-electric-cars-pacific-nauru/>>Google Scholar

Pardo, A, ‘Law of the Sea Conference – What Went Wrong’ in Friedheim, Robert L (ed), Managing Ocean Resources: A Primer (Westview Press 1979) 137Google Scholar

Parsons, C, ‘Moral Hazard in Liability Insurance’ (2003) 29 Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice 448Google Scholar

Pasquet, L, ‘Litigating the Immunities of International Organizations in Europe: The “Alternative Remedy” Approach and Its Humanizing Function’ (2021) 36(2) Utrecht J Int Eur Law 192Google Scholar

Payne, C, ‘Mastering the Evidence: Improving Fact Finding by International Courts’ (2011) 41 Envtl L 1191Google Scholar

Payne, C, ‘Negotiation and Dispute Prevention in Global Cooperative Institutions: International Community Interests, IUU Fishing and the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Negotiation’ (2020) 22 Int C L Rev 428Google Scholar

Pedersen, O, ‘An International Environmental Court and International Legalism’ (2012) 24(3) JEL 547Google Scholar

Pekkarinen, V, Toussaint, P and van Asselt, H, ‘Loss and Damage after Paris: Moving beyond Rhetoric’ (2019) 13 CCLR 31Google Scholar

Perry-Kessaris, A, ‘Corporate Liability for Environmental Harm’ in Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Ong, David M and Merkouris, Panos (eds), Research Handbook on International Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2010)Google Scholar

Pfennigstorf, W, ‘Policy Considerations for Insurers Engaging in Environmental Liability Insurance’ in Bocken, H and Ryckbost, D (eds), Insurance of Environmental Damage (Story-Scientia 1991) 269Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I, ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity’ (2015) 26(2) EJIL 471Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I, ‘Environmental Protection of the Deep Seabed’ in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (CUP 2017) 380Google Scholar

Plakokefalos, I and Schechinger, J, ‘Liability for Transboundary Harm’ in Nollkaemper, André and Plakokefalos, Ilias (eds), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (CUP 2017) 1051Google Scholar

Peel, J, ‘New State Responsibility Rules and Compliance with Multilateral Environmental Obligations: Some Case Studies of How the New Rules Might Apply in the International Environmental Context’ (2001) 10(1) RECIEL 82Google Scholar

Peel, J and Lin, J, ‘Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South’ (2019) 113(4) AJIL 679Google Scholar

Ragazzi, M, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Clarendon Press 1997)Google Scholar

Rao, C and Gautier, P, The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Law, Practice and Procedure (Edward Elgar 2018)Google Scholar

Ratliff, D, ‘The PCA Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment’ (2001) 14 LJIL 887Google Scholar

Redgwell, C, Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection (Manchester UP 1999)Google Scholar

Redgwell, C, ‘The Wrong Trousers: State Responsibility and International Environmental Law’ in Evans, Malcolm and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2013) 257Google Scholar

Regalia, J, ‘The Public Trust Doctrine and the Climate Crisis: Panacea or Platitude?’ (2021) 11(1) MJEAL 1Google Scholar

Reid, E, ‘Liability for Dangerous Activities: A Comparative Analysis’ (1999) 48 ICLQ 731Google Scholar

Reinisch, A, ‘Privileges and Immunities’ in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds), The Oxford Handbook on International Organizations (OUP 2016) 1048Google Scholar

Reis, TH, Compensation for Environmental Damages under International Law: The Role of the International Judge (Wolters Kluwer 2011)Google Scholar

Richardson, B, Environmental Regulation through Financial Organizations (Kluwer Law International 2002)Google Scholar

Robles, A Jr, ‘The 1994 Agreement on Deep Seabed Mining: Universality vs. the Common Heritage of Humanity’ (1996) 12 World Bulletin 20Google Scholar

Rojas, AS and Philips, FK, ‘Effective Control and Deep Seabed Mining: Toward a Definition’ Centre for International Governance Innovation, Liability Issues for Deep Seabed Mining Series, Paper No 7, February 2019Google Scholar

Rosas, A, ‘Issues of State Liability for Transboundary Environmental Damage’ (1991) 60 Nord J Intl L 29Google Scholar

Rudall, R, Compensation for Environmental Damage under International Law (Routledge 2020)Google Scholar

Sachariew, K, ‘The Definition of Thresholds of Tolerance for Transboundary Environmental Injury under International Law: Development and Present Status’ (1990) XXXVII NILR 193Google Scholar

Sand, PH, ‘The Rise of Public Trusteeship in International Environmental Law’ (2014) 44(1) EPL 210Google Scholar

Sands, P and Peel, J, Principles of International Environmental Law (4th edn, CUP 2018)Google Scholar

Sax, J, ‘The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention’ (1969) 68 Mich L Rev 571Google Scholar

Schisel-Meslin, J, ‘Out of the Club? Out of Luck: Complexities Facing Injured Third Parties Seeking Recovery from P&I Clubs’ (2019) 43 Tul Mar L J 319Google Scholar

Schuda, R, ‘The International Maritime Organization and the Draft Convention on Liability and Compensation in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea: An Update on Recent Activity’ (1992) 46 U Miami L Rev 1009Google Scholar

Schwartz, P, ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle’ in Krämer, Ludwig and Orlando, Emanuela (eds), Principles of Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2018) 264Google Scholar

Scott, K, ‘Geoengineering and the Marine Environment’ in Rayfuse, Rosemary (ed), Research Handbook on International Marine Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2015) 451Google Scholar

Scott, K and VanderZwaag, D, ‘Polar Oceans and Law of the Sea’ in Rothwell, Donald, Elferink, Alex Oude, Scott, Karen and Stephens, Tim (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Law of the Sea (OUP 2015) 724Google Scholar

Scott, K, ‘Ocean Acidification: A Due Diligence Obligation under the LOSC’ (2020) 35 IJMCL 382Google Scholar

Scott, S, ‘Australia’s Decision to Initiate Whaling in the Antarctic: Winning the Case versus Resolving the Dispute’ (2014) 68(1) Aust J Int’l Aff 1Google Scholar

Scovazzi, T, ‘The Mediterranean Guidelines for Determination of Environmental Liability and Compensation: The Negotiations of the Instrument and the Question of Damage that Can Be Compensated’ (2009) 13 Max Planck UNYB 183Google Scholar

Shavell, S, ‘Strict Liability versus Negligence’ (1980) 9 JLS 1Google Scholar

Shibata, A (ed), International Liability Regime for Biodiversity Damage: The Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol (Routledge 2014)Google Scholar

Siegele, L, ‘Loss and Damage (Article 8)’ in Klein, Daniel, Carazo, María Pía, Doelle, Meinhard, Bulmer, Jane and Higham, Andrew (eds), The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary (OUP 2017) 224Google Scholar

Soares, G and Vargas, E, ‘The Basel Liability Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage Resulting from Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal’ (2001) 12(1) Yearbook Int Environ Law 69Google Scholar

Sohn, L, ‘The Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (1973) 14 Harv Int’l L J 423Google Scholar

Solntsev, AM, ‘The International Environmental Court – A Necessary Institution for Sustainable Planetary Governance in the Anthropocene’ in Lim, Michelle (ed), Charting Environmental Law Futures in the Anthropocene (Springer 2019)Google Scholar

Steffen, W, Richardson, K, Rockström, J and Cornell, SE, ‘Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet’ (2015) 347 (6223) Science 736Google Scholar

Stephens, T, International Courts and Environmental Protection (CUP 2009)Google Scholar

Stephens, T, ‘Environmental Litigation by Asia Pacific States at the International Court of Justice’ (2021) 21 MJIL 653Google Scholar

Stephens, T, ‘The Development of International Environmental Law by the International Court of Justice’ in Fisher, Douglas (ed), Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar 2022) 184Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J, ‘Risk Incentives and Insurance: The Pure Theory of Moral Hazard’ (1983) 8 GRIR 4Google Scholar

Stone, C, ‘Should Trees Have Standing – Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects’ (1972) 45 S Cal L Rev 450Google Scholar

Tams, C, Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (CUP 2005)Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y, ‘Reflections on Locus Standi in Response to a Breach of Obligations Erga Omnes Partes: A Comparative Analysis of the Whaling in the Antarctic and South China Sea Cases’ (2018) 17 LPICT 527Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y, ‘The Legal Consequences of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law’ (2021) 68(1) NILR 1Google Scholar

Tanaka, Y, ‘Temporal Elements in the Valuation of Environmental Damage: Reflections on the Costa Rica v Nicaragua Case before the International Court of Justice’ (2021) 90 Nord J Intl L 257Google Scholar

Tarver, D, ‘“Hunnuh Mus Tek Cyare da Root fa Heal da Tree”: Saving the South Carolina Lowcountry from Overdevelopment through Judicial Application of a Modern Public Trust’ (2017) 68 S C L Rev 1047Google Scholar

Taylor, P, ‘The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind’ in Fisher, Douglas, (ed), Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law (Edward Elgar 2016) 306Google Scholar

Taylor, P and Stroud, L, Common Heritage of Mankind: A Bibliography of Legal Writing (Fondation de Malte 2013)Google Scholar

Telesetsky, A, ‘The 2010 Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol: A New Treaty Assigning Transboundary Liability and Redress for Biodiversity Damage Caused by Genetically Modified Organisms’ (2011) 14 ASIL Insight 2Google Scholar

Telicki, K, ‘Developing a Communications and Engagement Strategy for the International Seabed Authority to Ensure Active Stakeholder Participation in the Development of a Minerals Exploitation Code’ (2016) ISA Discussion Paper No 3Google Scholar

Toussaint, P, ‘Loss and Damage and Climate Litigation: The Case for Greater Interlinkage’ (2022) 30(1) RECIEL 16Google Scholar

Trindade, AAC, International Law for Humankind: Toward a New Jus Gentium (Martinus Nijhoff 2005)Google Scholar

Turnipseed, M and others, ‘Reinvigorating the Public Trust Doctrine: Expert Opinion on the Potential of Public Trust Mandate in US and International Environmental Law’ (2010) 52(5) Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 7Google Scholar

UNEP-WCMC, ‘Governance of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable use: Institutional Arrangements and Cross-sectoral Cooperation in the Western Indian Ocean and the Southeast Pacific’ (UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre 2017)Google Scholar

Urs, P, ‘Obligations Erga Omnes and the Question of Standing before the International Court of Justice’ (2021) 34(2) LJIL 505Google Scholar

Vanden Borre, T, ‘Shifts in Governance in Compensation for Nuclear Damage 20 Years after Chernobyl’ in Faure, Michael and Verheij, Albert (eds), Compensation for Environmental Damage (Springer 2007) 262Google Scholar

Van Dover, CL and others, ‘Biodiversity Loss from Deep Sea Mining’ (2017) 10 Nat Geosci 464Google Scholar

Vierucci, L, ‘NGOs before International Courts and Tribunals’ in Dupuy, Pierre-Marie and Vierucci, Luisa (eds), NGOs in International Law: Efficiency in Flexibility? (Edward Elgar 2008)Google Scholar

Vigni, P, ‘The Interaction between the Antarctic Treaty System and the Other Relevant Conventions Applicable to the Antarctic Area: A Practical Approach versus Theoretical Doctrines’ in Frowein, JA and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (Kluwer 2000) 481Google Scholar

Vogler, J, The Global Commons: A Regime Analysis (Wiley & Sons 1995)Google Scholar

Vogler, J, The Global Commons: Environmental and Technological Governance (2nd edn, Wiley 2000)Google Scholar

Vönecky, S, ‘The Liability Annex to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty’ in König, Doris, Stoll, Peter-Tobias, Röben, Volker and Matz-Lück, Nele (eds), International Law Today: New Challenges and the Need for Reform? (Springer 2007) 186Google Scholar

Voyer, M and van Leeuwen, J, ‘“Social License to Operate” in the Blue Economy’ (2019) 62 Resour Pol’y 102Google Scholar

Weinrib, EJ, ‘Corrective Justice in a Nutshell’ (2002) 52 UTLJ 349Google Scholar

Weinrib, EJ, The Idea of Private Law (rev edn, OUP 2012)Google Scholar

Wetterstein, P (ed), Harm to the Environment: the Right to Compensation and Assessment of Damages (OUP 1997)Google Scholar

Wetterstein, P, ‘Pure Environmental Damage’ in Handl, Günther and Svendsen, Kristoffer (eds), Managing the Risk of Offshore Oil and Gas Accidents (Edward Elgar 2019) 305Google Scholar

Wewerinke-Singh, M and others, ‘Bringing Climate Change before the International Court of Justice: Prospects for Contentious Cases and Advisory Opinion’ in Alogna, Ivano, Bakker, Christine and Gauci, Jean-Pierre (eds), Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives (Brill 2021) 393Google Scholar

Wijk, A, Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals (Nomos/Hart 2018)Google Scholar

Wilde, M, Civil Liability for Environmental Damage: A Comparative Analysis of Law and Policy in Europe and the United States (Kluwer Law International 2004)Google Scholar

Wilder, M, ‘The Settlement of Disputes under the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty’ (1995) 31(179) Polar Rec 399Google Scholar

Williams, S, Woolaver, H and Palmer, E, The Amicus Curiae in International Criminal Justice (Hart Publishing 2020)Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘Purposes and Principles of International Environmental Law’ (1990) 33 GYIL 308Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R, ‘Liability for Environmental Damage in Antarctica: Supplement to the Rules on State Responsibility or a Lost Opportunity?’ in Buffard, Isabelle (ed), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Martinus Nijhoff 2008) 817Google Scholar

Wood, MC and Woodward, CW IV, ‘Atmospheric Trust Litigation and the Constitutional Right to a Healthy Climate System: Judicial Recognition at Last’ (2016) 6 Wash J Envtl L & Pol’y 634Google Scholar

Wouters, J and Odermatt, J, ‘Assessing the Legality of Decisions’ in Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds), The Oxford Handbook on International Organizations (OUP 2016) 1006Google Scholar

Wright, RW, ‘Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts’ 73 Iowa L Rev (1987–1988) 1001Google Scholar

Wright, G, Rochette, J, Gjerde, K and Seeder, I, ‘The Long and Winding Road: Negotiating a Treaty for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ IDDRI Study No 18, August 2018 <www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/201808-Study_HauteMer-long%20and%20winding%20road.pdf>>Google Scholar

Xue, H, Transboundary Damage in International Law (CUP 2003)Google Scholar

Yang, X, State Immunity in International Law (CUP 2012)Google Scholar

Young, M and Friedman, A, ‘Biodiversity beyond National Jurisdiction: Regimes and Their Interaction’ (2018) 112 AJIL Unbound 123Google Scholar

Zhang, H, ‘The Obligation of Due Diligence in Regulating the Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction’ in Zou, Keyuan (ed), Global Commons and the Law of the Sea (Brill Nijhoff 2018) 286Google Scholar