Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- I Approaches to lending and borrowing
- II The ideology of lending and borrowing
- III Borrowing and repayment
- IV The rôle of interest
- V Philia and friendship
- VI Non-professional lending: loans without interest
- VII Non-professional lending: loans bearing interest
- VIII Professional money-lending
- IX Conclusion
- Appendices
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index of passages cited
- Index of papyri
- Index of inscriptions
- General index
IV - The rôle of interest
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- I Approaches to lending and borrowing
- II The ideology of lending and borrowing
- III Borrowing and repayment
- IV The rôle of interest
- V Philia and friendship
- VI Non-professional lending: loans without interest
- VII Non-professional lending: loans bearing interest
- VIII Professional money-lending
- IX Conclusion
- Appendices
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index of passages cited
- Index of papyri
- Index of inscriptions
- General index
Summary
MOEROCLES AND THE METAPHOR OF INTEREST
Amongst the topics covered in Aristotle's Art of Rhetoric is the use of metaphor. Embedded in a long list of illustrations, most of them bons mots by Athenian politicians, is the following example (141 1a16–18):
Moerocles said that he was no more of a villain than one of the respectable people (tina tōn epieikōn), whom he named; for that man played the villain at 33⅓ per cent (epitritōn tokōn); but he himself at only 10 per cent (epidekatōn).
The context of the comment is unknown, but Moerocles can be identified as a contemporary of Demosthenes. Although earlier commentators failed to appreciate the point of the metaphor (see Billeter 1898: 12), the allusion is presumably to the exaction of interest from borrowers (not profits; see Freese 1926: ad loc.). The figures quoted seem to represent the highest and lowest rates commonly found in Athens. In what follows, I will try to show how the moralizing aspect of the metaphor gives a clue to the fixing of Athenian interest rates.
Ancient interest rates come second only to banks in the attention they have received from historians, but an approach along moral lines is at odds with earlier suggestions. Superficial similarities invite arbitrary comparisons between ancient and modern rates, frequently combined with attempts to determine interest trends over time (see OCD s.v. ‘interest, rate of’). Interpretation of the evidence tends to be based on the assumption that the level of interest is itself a significant indicator of the condition of society.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens , pp. 91 - 108Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1991