Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T14:00:53.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - The Legal Profession’s Promise of Justice: Choices and Challenges in Legal and Sociolegal Work

from Part IV - Political Liberalism and the Legal Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

By
Mark Fathi Massoud
Edited by
Rosann Greenspan ,
Hadar Aviram  and
Jonathan Simon
Rosann Greenspan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Hadar Aviram
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Jonathan Simon
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides a socio-legal perspective on justice in the legal profession and in legal scholarship by bringing together the values of idealism and humanism with ambition, materialism, and science. For lawyers and judges, the practice of justice may be guided by contradictory pulls toward public-spirited idealism (for instance, helping an indigent client or promoting social transformation) and self-serving materialism (for instance, increasing personal earnings or improving reputation). For legal scholars, studies of law emanate from sometimes conflicting impulses to build social theory and the rule of law, adopt social scientific research designs, and achieve personal goals that improve one’s renown. Exposing these tensions in pursuing justice and in writing about justice reveals the promises and perils of legal practice and legal scholarship.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice
Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley
 , pp. 314 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Richard. 1985. “Comparative Sociology of Legal Professions: An Exploratory Essay.” 10 Law & Social Inquiry 1: 5–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard. 1986. “The Decline of Professionalism?” 49 The Modern Law Review 1: 1–41.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard. 2010. “The Paradoxes of Pro Bono.” 78 Fordham Law Review: 2443–50.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. and Philip S. C., Lewis, eds. 1988a. Lawyers in Society: The Common Law World (Volume 1). New York: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. and Philip S. C., Lewis, eds. 1988b. Lawyers in Society: The Civil Law World (Volume 2). New York: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. and Philip S. C., Lewis, eds. 1989. Lawyers in Society: Comparative Theories (Volume 3). New York: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. and Philip S. C., Lewis, eds. 1996. Lawyers in Society: An Overview. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard and Lewis, Philip S. C.. 1996. “Putting Law Back into the Sociology of Lawyers.” In Lawyers in Society: An Overview, edited by Abel, Richard L. and Philip S. C., Lewis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Albert, Kyle and Weeden, Kim. 2011. “Occupations and Professions.” Oxford Bibliographies. DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199756384–0038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Bernard. 1963. “Some Problems in the Sociology of the Professions.” 92 Daedalus 4: 669–88.Google Scholar
Becker, Theodore L. and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 1973. The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bob, Clifford. 2002. “Political Process Theory and Transnational Movements: Dialectics of Protest among Nigeria’s Ogoni Minority.” 49 Social Problems 3: 395–415.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A. 1995. “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation.” In Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, edited by West, C.., Crenshaw, K., Gotanda, N., Peller, G., and Thomas, K.. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Branch, Adam. 2007. “Uganda’s Civil War and the Politics of ICC Intervention.” 21 Ethics & International Affairs 2: 179–98.Google Scholar
Branch, Adam. 2011. Displacing Human Rights: War and Intervention in Northern Uganda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. 2008. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1987. “Victims in the Shadow of the Law: A Critique of the Model of Legal Protection.” 12 Signs 421–39.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A.. 1933. The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization, and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. 1976. “The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation.” 89 Harvard Law Review 7: 1281–316.Google Scholar
Cheesman, Nick. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar’s Courts Make Law and Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2012. “Pragmatic Resistance, Law, and Social Movements in Authoritarian States: The Case of Gay Collective Action in Singapore.” 46 Law & Society Review 4: 713–48.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014a. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014b. “Rights Mobilization and the Campaign to Decriminalize Homosexuality in Singapore.” 1 Asian Journal of Law and Society 1: 205–28.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger. 2006. “The Concept of Legal Culture.” In Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate. 81–96.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2003. “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition, 1990–2002.” 10 Democratization 4: 70–91.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L. 2004. The Politics of Pro Bono. 52 UCLA Law Review 1: 18–25.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., ed. 2011. The Paradox of Professionalism: Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G.. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yves, Dezalay, Sarat, Austin, and Silbey, Susan. 1989. “D’une Démarche Contestataire à un Savoir Méritocratique: Éléments pour une Historie Sociale de la Sociologie Juridique Américaine.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 78: 79–93.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellett, Rachel. 2013. Pathways to Judicial Power in Transitional States: Perspectives from African Courts. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellett, Rachel. 2015. “Interviewing African Judges: Reflections on Fieldwork and Data Collection in Comparative Judicial Politics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (on file with author).Google Scholar
Ellett, Rachel and Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2016. “Not All Law is Public: Reflections on Data Transparency for Law and Courts Research in Africa.” 12 American Political Science Association African Politics Conference Group (APCG) Newsletter 2: 8–10.Google Scholar
Englund, Harri. 2004. “Towards a Critique of Rights Talk in New Democracies: The Case of Legal Aid in Malawi.” Discourse & Society 15 (5): 527–51.Google Scholar
Englund, Harri. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Erie, Matthew. 2016. China and Islam: The Prophet, the Party, and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan S.. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1996. “The Path of the Lawyer.” 110 Harvard Law Review: 1013–18.Google Scholar
He, Xin and Yang, Su. 2013. “Do the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead in Shanghai Courts?” 10 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1: 120–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1973. “Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective.” 7 Law & Society Review: 407–25.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1982. “Plea Bargaining and the Structure of the Criminal Process.” 7 Justice System Journal 3: 338–54.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 1987. “The Adversary System.” In Encyclopedia of the American Judicial System: Studies of the Principal Institutions and Processes of Law (Volume II), edited by Janosik, Robert J.. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 2010. “The Personal and the Professional: Assessing the Ambivalent Commitment to Racial Justice in the United States.” 44 Law & Society Review 3/4: 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 2012. “Judge and Company: Courts, Constitutionalism, and the Legal Complex.” In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, edited by Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. and Rubin, Edward. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America’s Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. and Miyazawa, Setsuo, eds. 2002. The Japanese Adversary System in Context: Controversies and Comparisons. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ghias, Shoaib. 2011. “Miscarriage of Chief Justice: Judicial Power and the Legal Complex in Pakistan under Musharraf.” 35 Law & Social Inquiry 4: 985–1022.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2004. “Martin Shapiro and the Movement from ‘Old’ to ‘New’ Institutionalist Studies in Public Law Scholarship.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 363–82.Google Scholar
Gobe, Eric and Salaymeh, Lena. 2016. “Tunisia’s ‘Revolutionary’ Lawyers: From Professional Autonomy to Political Mobilization.” 41 Law & Social Inquiry 2: 311–45.Google Scholar
Gómez, Laura. 2010. “Looking for Race in All the Wrong Places.” 46 Law & Society Review 2: 221–45.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2013. Making Human Rights a Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. and Karpik, Lucien, eds. 1998. Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. 2007. “The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism.” In Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism, edited by Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 1–42.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M., eds. 2012. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C. and Karpik, Lucien. 2012. “Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: A Theme with Three Variations.” In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, edited by Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 2005. Reforming Punishment: Psychological Limits to the Pains of Imprisonment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association (APA) Books.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig. 2006. Death by Design: Capital Punishment as a Social Psychological System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra. 2013. “International Criminal Law by Other Means: The Quasi-Criminal Jurisdiction of Human Rights Courts.” 107 American Journal of International Law 1: 1–44.Google Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C. 2015. “For a More Public Political Science.” 13 Perspectives on Politics 2: 269–83.Google Scholar
Jacobs, And rew and Buckley, Chris. 2015. “China Targeting Rights Lawyers in a Crackdown.” New York Times, July 22, 2015. http://nyti.ms/1LDjrXE.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawar, Leila. 2015. Contesting Immigration Policy in Court: Legal Activism and its Radiating Effects in the United States and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David. 2002. “The International Human Rights Movement: Part of the Problem?” Harvard Human Rights Journal 15: 99–125.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2009. “The Rule of Law and the ‘Three Integrations.’” 1 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1: 21–27.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2011. “Four Puzzles about the Rule of Law: Why, What, Where? And Who Cares?” 50 Nomos: 64–104.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2012a. Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2012b. “Missing All That Matters.” 10 Issues in Legal Scholarship 1: 5–17.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2014a. “Reply to Patrick Emerton, ‘Naturalising Natural Law? Reflections on Martin Krygier’s Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World and Kristen Rundle, Forms Liberate: Reclaiming the Jurisprudence of Lon L. Fuller.’” 39 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 176–88.Google Scholar
Krygier, 2014b. “The Rule of Law after the Short Twentieth Century: Launching a Global Career.” In Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell, edited by Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David. Aldershot: Ashgate. 327–46.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin. 2016. “The Rule of Law Between England and Sudan: Hay, Thompson, and Massoud.” 41 Law & Social Inquiry 2: 480–88.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism, and South Africa’s Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Heinz and Merry, Sally. 2016. The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally (Volume II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard. 2010. “A Personal Odyssey Toward a Theme: Race and Equality in the United States, 1948–2009.” 44 Law & Society Review 3/4: 431–62.Google Scholar
Lynch, Mona and Haney, Craig. 2015. “Emotion, Authority, and Death: (Raced) Negotiations in Mock Capital Jury Deliberations.” 40 Law & Social Inquiry 2: 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Keith M. 1995. The Sociology of the Professions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2011. “Do Victims of War Need International Law? Human Rights Education Programs in Authoritarian Sudan.” 45 Law & Society Review 1: 1–32.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2012. “Lawyers and the Disintegration of the Legal Complex in Sudan.” In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, edited by Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2013. Law’s Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2014. “International Arbitration and Judicial Politics in Authoritarian States.” 39 Law & Social Inquiry 1: 1–30.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2015. “Work Rules: How International NGOs Build Law in War-Torn Societies.” 49 Law & Society Review 2: 333–64.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2016a. “Ideals and Practices in the Rule of Law: An Essay on Legal Politics.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (2): 489–501.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2016b. “Field Research on Law in Conflict Zones and Authoritarian States.” Annual Review of Law & Social Science 12: 85–106.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2016c. “The Politics of Islamic Law and Human Rights: Sudan’s Rival Legal Systems.” In The New Legal Realism: Studying Law Globally, edited by Klug, Heinz and Merry, Sally Engle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2018. “How an Islamic State Rejected Islamic Law.” American Journal of Comparative Law 66 (3): 579–602.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, Macaulay, Stewart, and Mitchell, Thomas W.. 2016. The New Legal Realism: Translating Law-and-Society for Today’s Legal Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2006. “The Practice of Law as an Obstacle to Justice: Chinese Lawyers at Work.” 40 Law & Society Review 1: 1–38.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2007. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2013a. “Liberal Rights versus Islamic Law? The Construction of a Binary in Malaysian Politics.” 47 Law & Society Review 771–802.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2013b. “Judging in God’s Name: State Power, Secularism, and the Politics of Islamic Law in Malaysia.” 2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Mutua, Makau. 2008. Human Rights: A Political and Cultural Critique. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment.” 34 Law & Society Review 4: 1055–90.Google Scholar
Noonan, John. 2002. Persons and Masks of the Law: Cardozo, Holmes, Jefferson, and Wythe as Makers of the Masks. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Obasogie, Osagie K. 2014. Blinded by Sight: Seeing Race through the Eyes of the Blind. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Qualitative Data Repository. 2018. Available at: https://qdr.syr.edu/about.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet. 2016. 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Robert Eli. 2012. “All Fact is Beautiful Theory: The Romantic Philip Selznick.” 10 Issues in Legal Scholarship 1: 63–70.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (2nd edn.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin and Silbey, Susan. 1988. “The Pull of the Policy Audience.” 10 Law & Policy 2/3: 97–166.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2013. “The Rule of Law and the Frankenstate: Why Governance Checklists Do Not Work.” 26 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 4: 559–62.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2015. “Common Template, Diverse Agendas: The Futility (and Danger) of Legislating for the World.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association (on file with author).Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll. 2016. “The Two Faces of Law and Inequality: From Critique to the Promise of Situated, Pragmatic Policy.” 50 Law & Society Review 1: 9–33.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1992. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 2008. A Humanist Science: Values and Ideals in Social Inquiry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, ed. 2012. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharafi, Mitra. 2014. Law and Identity in Colonial South Asia: Parsi Legal Culture, 1772–1947. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2008. “Singapore: The Exception That Proves Rules Matter.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2000. The Practice of Justice: A Theory of Lawyers’ Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism,’ and the Future of Public Law.” 82 American Political Science Review 1: 89–108.Google Scholar
Stacy, Helen. 2009. Human Rights for the 21st Century: Sovereignty, Civil Society, Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Gerald. 2008 [1976]. The Buffalo Creek Disaster: How the Survivors of One of the Worst Disasters in Coal-Mining History Brought Suit against the Coal Company and Won. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Stern, Rachel. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2012. Failing Law Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States.” 1974 Wisconsin Law Review 4: 1062–102.Google Scholar
Van Seters, Paul. 2012. “Selznick and Dworkin: The Importance of Values in Moral and Social Theory.” 10 Issues in Legal Scholarship 1: 43–53.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia. 1991. The Alchemy of Race and Rights: Diary of a Law Professor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, Farhat J. 1968–1969. “Abstract of the Role of Lawyers in Egypt.” 3 Law & Society Review: 407–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×