Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:18:11.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Japanese Court Reform on Trial

from Part II - Court Reform on Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2019

Rosann Greenspan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Hadar Aviram
Affiliation:
University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Jonathan Simon
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Court reform is on trial in Japan and two things can be said about the verdict: it will take at least several more years to make a sound assessment of the recent changes, and when the conclusion comes, it will be a hung jury, because different people expect different things from the reforms – and they are not compatible.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Legal Process and the Promise of Justice
Studies Inspired by the Work of Malcolm Feeley
, pp. 122 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Jeffrey. 1994. We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Adler, Stephan J. 1994. The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kent and Johnson, David T.. 2010. “Japan’s New Criminal Trials: Origins, Operations, and Implications.” In New Courts in Asia, edited by Harding, rew and Nicholson, Penelope (Pip), 371–90. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kent and Nolan, Mark. 2004. “Lay Participation in the Japanese Justice System: A Few Preliminary Thoughts Regarding the Lay Assessor System (saiban-in seido) from Domestic Historical and International Psychological Perspectives.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 37 (4): 935–92.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S.. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” The American Political Science Review 56: 947–52.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1988. “On the Pursuit of the Ideal.” New York Review of Books. Vol. 35, No. 4 (March 17, 1988), www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1988/mar/17/on-the-pursuit-of-the-ideal/.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P. 1999. A Theory of the Trial. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P. 2009. The Death of the American Trial. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. 1909 [2013]. “The Twelve Men,” in Tremendous Trifles. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1983. Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm and Miyazawa, Setsuo, eds. 2002. The Japanese Adversary System in Context: Controversies and Comparisons. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 1998. Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2008. “Justice System Reform in Japan.” Unpublished paper, available at www.reds.msh-paris.fr/communication/docs/foote.pdf.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2010. “Policymaking by the Japanese Judiciary in the Criminal Justice Field.” Hoshakaigaku 72: 645.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2013. “The Trials and Tribulations of Japan’s Law Schools and Bar Exam System.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 36: 369458.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2002. The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2004. “Nihon ni okeru Shiho Seido Kaikaku: Keisatsu no Shozai to Sono Juyosei” [Justice System Reform in Japan: Where Are the Police and Why It Matters]. Horitsu Jiho 76: 815.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2015. “Policing in Japan.” In The Sage Handbook of Modern Japanese Studies, edited by Babb, James, 222–43. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Justice System Reform Council. 2001. “Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: For A Justice System to Support Japan in the 21st Century.” Accessed April 2, 2017. http://japan.kantei.go.jp/policy/sihou/singikai/990612_e.html.Google Scholar
Kalven Jr., Harry and Zeisel, Hans. 1966. The American Jury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, John H. 1978. “Torture and Plea Bargaining.” University of Chicago Law Review 46: 322.Google Scholar
Levin, Mark and Tice, Virginia. 2009. “Japan’s New Citizen Judges: How Secrecy Imperils Judicial Reform.” The Asia-Pacific Journal 7 (19): 117. Accessed at www.japanfocus.org/-Virginia-Tice/3141.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1991. “Administrative Controls of Japanese Judges.” In Law and the Technology in the Pacific Community, edited by Philip, S. C. Lewis, 263–81. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1992. Policing in Japan: A Study on Making Crime. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2007. “Law Reform, Lawyers, and Access to Justice.” In Japanese Business Law, edited by McAlinn, Gerald Paul, 3989. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo, Chan, Kay-Wah, and Lee, Ilhyung. 2008. “The Reform of Legal Education in East Asia.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4: 333–61.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2013. “Successes, Failures, and Remaining Issues of the Justice System Reform in Japan: An Introduction to the Symposium Issue.” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 36: 313–48.Google Scholar
Mori, Hono. 2013. Shiho Kenryoku no Uchimaku. Tokyo: Chikuma Shinsho.Google Scholar
Packer, Herbert L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark J. and Rasmusen, Eric B.. 2003. Measuring Judicial Independence: The Political Economy of Judging in Japan. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark J. and Rasmusen, Eric B.. 2015. “Lowering the Bar to Raise the Bar: Licensing Difficulty and Attorney Quality in Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 41: 113–42.Google Scholar
Saegusa, Mayumi. 2009. “Why the Japanese Law School System Was Established: Co-optation as a Defensive Tactic in the Face of Global Pressures.” Law & Social Inquiry 34: 365–98.Google Scholar
Saeki, Masahiko. 2010. “Victim Participation in Criminal Trials in Japan.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 38: 149–65.Google Scholar
Segi, Hiroshi. 2014. Zetsubo no Saibansho. Tokyo: Kodansha Shinsho.Google Scholar
Fukuda, Taku. 2013. Shikei Haishi Nempo [The Death Penalty Annual]. Tokyo: Impakuto.Google Scholar
Shinomiya, Satoru. 2013. “Saibanin Saiban: Saibanin Seido wa Keiji Jitsumu o Dono yo ni Kaete Iru ka.” Unpublished paper, Kokugakuin University School of Law, Tokyo, March, 113.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Japan. 2012. Saibanin Saiban Jisshi Jokyo no Kensho Hokokusho. Tokyo: Saikosaibansho Jimusokyoku. 1122.Google Scholar
Takano, Takashi. 2009. “Nihon no Kensatsu wa Hetare na no ka”, in Keiji Saiban o Kangaeru: Takano . June 14 and June 23.Google Scholar
Takeda, Masahiro. 2014. “Saibanin Seido Kaishi kara 5nen: Kensatsu wa Taisho Jiken o Shincho ni Kiso: Saibanin Kohosha no Jitairitsu, 60% Koeru.” Journalism (Fall): 136–43.Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil and Hans, Valerie P.. 2007. American Juries: The Verdict. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun Shakaibu. 2013. Shikei: Kyukoku no Batsu no Shinjitsu. Tokyo: Chuokoron-Shinsha.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×