Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Narratives for Early Medieval Britain and Ireland
- 2 Images of Gildas
- 3 Gildas’s De excidio – Authority and the Monastic Ideal
- 4 Columbanus and Gregory the Great
- 5 Gildas and the Hibernensis
- 6 Bede and Gildas
- Conclusion: The Legacy of Gildas
- Appendix: De communicatione Gildas
- Bibliography
- Index
- Studies in Celtic History
5 - Gildas and the Hibernensis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- List of Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Narratives for Early Medieval Britain and Ireland
- 2 Images of Gildas
- 3 Gildas’s De excidio – Authority and the Monastic Ideal
- 4 Columbanus and Gregory the Great
- 5 Gildas and the Hibernensis
- 6 Bede and Gildas
- Conclusion: The Legacy of Gildas
- Appendix: De communicatione Gildas
- Bibliography
- Index
- Studies in Celtic History
Summary
Gildas's inclusive approach to resolving the spiritual and political crisis in his Britannia is demonstrated in his final appeal to the proclamation of the watchman Ezekiel: that God did not desire the death of sinners, but that they should turn back and live. This inclusive attitude is reinforced by Gildas's subsequent approach to church discipline as represented by elements of his letter to Finnian, preserved as fragments within the Collectio canonum Hibernensis as well as in certain earlier versions of this hugely influential canon collection. Here, Gildas laid out his view that religious zeal and excessive censure should be eschewed in favour of moderation, that a Christian community should be tolerant and connected rather than judgmental and fragmented:
Noah did not wish to keep his son Ham, teacher of the magic art, away from the ark or from sharing his table. Abraham did not shrink from Aner and Eschcol when he was warring with the five kings. Lot did not curse the banquets of the Sodomites… Moses, too, lodged and banqueted in peace with Jethro. Our Lord Jesus Christ did not avoid eating with publicans, so as to save all sinners and whores.
At the same time, Gildas stressed the proper structuring of a Christian community to maintain stability, recalling the model of authority put forward in his De excidio:
‘Let each in God stay where he is called’: so that the chief should not be changed except at the choice of his subjects, nor the subject obtain the place of his superior without the advice of an elder… Therefore it is quite proper for bishops and abbots to judge those beneath them, for their blood will be required at their hands by the Lord if they do not rule them well. But those who disobey their fathers shall be as the heathen and publicans.
The acceptance of Gildas as a spiritual master on church discipline reveals an understanding that his criticisms of the secular and church leaders of Britannia in his De excidio were not polemical but constructive. It also implies that contemporaneous political and church structures may have been restored on the lines of Gildas's intervention, granting a stability that would make Columbanus's intervention on the continent both practically possible and confident in its message.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Legacy of GildasConstructions of Authority in the Early Medieval West, pp. 107 - 130Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2022