From Dayton to Dover: the legacy of the <span class='italic'>Scopes Trial</span>

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493843.007

7 - From Dayton to Dover: the legacy of the Scopes Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2009

Peter Radan

Edited by

Peter Cane ,

Carolyn Evans and

Zoe Robinson

Show author details

Peter Cane: Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Carolyn Evans: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Zoe Robinson: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

On 10 July 1925, in the Rhea County Courthouse in Dayton, Tennessee, Judge John T. Raulston of the 18th Circuit Court called upon Reverend Cartwright to open the proceedings for the day with a prayer, a practice that was repeated at the start of proceedings on each day of the matter before the court. Reverend Cartwright duly called upon God to ‘grant unto every individual that share of wisdom that will enable them to go out from this session of the court with the consciousness of having under God and grace done the very best thing possible and the wisest thing possible’. And so began the case of State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes (Scopes Trial). Scopes, a teacher at Rhea County High School, appeared before the court charged with breaching section 1 of Tennessee's so-called Butler Act. This Act, adopted in March 1925, prohibited the teaching, in Tennessee's public educational institutions, of ‘any theory that denie[d] the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and [the teaching] that man … descended from a lower order of animals’.

The Scopes Trial was the first case in which the teaching of evolution in American public schools was brought before the courts. A number of cases followed in subsequent years. There is every indication that this stream of litigation will continue into the future.

Type: Chapter
Information: Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context , pp. 123 - 156

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493843.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

The World's Most Famous Court Trial, Tennessee Evolution Case (Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, 1999), p. 3.

Larson, E. J., Summer for the Gods, The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar

Bailey, K. K., ‘The Enactment of Tennessee's Antievolution Law’ (1950) 16 The Journal of Southern History472.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hunter, J. D., Culture Wars, The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic Books, 1991)Google Scholar

Dionne, E. J. and Cromartie, M. (eds.), Is There a Culture War? A Dialogue on Values and American Public Life (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Hammond, P. E., Machacek, D. W. and Mazur, E. M., Religion on Trial, How Supreme Court Trends Threaten Freedom of Conscience in America (Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004), p. 48.Google Scholar

Fessenden, T., ‘The Nineteenth-Century Bible Wars and the Separation of Church and State’ (2005) 74 Church History784 at 785.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moran, J. P., The Scopes Trial, A Brief History With Documents (Boston, MA: Bedford/St Martin's, 2002), p. 8.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, J. R. and Pellegrini, A., ‘Getting Religion’ in Garber, M. and Walkowitz, R. L. (eds.), One Nation Under God? Religion and American Culture (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 109.Google Scholar

Marsden, G. M., Religion and American Culture (San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990), p. 119.Google Scholar

Adams, C. F., ‘The Sifted Grain and the Grain Sifters’ (1901) 6 American Historical Review197CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruse, M., The Evolution-Creation Struggle (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005), p. 154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Livingstone, D. N., Darwin's Forgotten Defenders, The Encounter Between Evangelical Theology and Evolutionary Thought (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1987), p. 147.Google Scholar

Larson, E. J., Trial and Error, The American Controversy Over Creation and Evolution, updated edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar

Israel, C. A., Before Scopes, Evangelicalism, Education, and Evolution in Tennessee, 1870–1925 (Athens, GA: University of George Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Walker, S., In Defense of American Liberties, A History of the ACLU, second edn (Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999), pp. 72–3Google Scholar

Baldwin, R. N., ‘Dayton's First Issue’ in Tompkins, J. R. (ed.), D-Days at Dayton, Reflections on the Scopes Trial (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1965), p. 63.Google Scholar

Wooten, D. G., ‘The Scopes Case’ (1925) 1 The Notre Dame Lawyer11 at 20–1.Google Scholar

Levine, L. W., Defender of the Faith, William Jennings Bryan: The Last Decade, 1915–1925 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987), p. 327.Google Scholar

Cole, F.-C., ‘A Witness at the Scopes Trial’ (1959) 200(1) Scientific American120CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Larson, E. J., ‘The Scopes Trial in History and Legend’ in Lindberg, D. C. and Numbers, R. L. (eds.), When Science and Christianity Meet (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 251.Google Scholar

Kazin, M., A Godly Hero, The Life of William Jennings Bryan, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006), p. 305.Google Scholar

Wills, G., Under God, Religion and American Politics (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990), p. 101.Google Scholar

Bryan, W. J., ‘Back to God’, The Commoner, XXI, August 1921Google Scholar

Ginger, R. (ed.), William Jennings Bryan: Selections (Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Co. Inc., 1967) p. 230.

Mencken, H. L., The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, third edn (Boston, MA: Luce & Company: 1913), pp. 102–3.Google Scholar

Gilbert, J., Redeeming Culture, American Religion in the Age of Science (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1997), p. 31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalven, H., ‘A Commemorative Case Note, Scopes v State’ (1960) 27 The University of Chicago Law Review505 at 508CrossRef Google Scholar

Carpenter, C. E., ‘The Constitutionality of the Tennessee Anti-Evolution Law’ (1926–1927) 6 Oregon Law Review130.Google Scholar

Ingber, S., ‘Religion or Ideology: A Needed Clarification of the Religion Clauses’ (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review233 at 260.CrossRef Google Scholar

Szasz, F. M., The Divided Mind of Protestant America, 1880–1930 (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 1982), p. 123.Google Scholar

Moore, R., Evolution in the Courtroom, A Reference Guide (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC Clio, 2002), pp. 52–3.Google Scholar

Scott, E. C., Evolution vs. Creationism, An Introduction (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005), pp. 99–104.Google Scholar

Peterson, D., ‘The Little Engine That Could Undo Darwinism’, The American Spectator, June 2005, 34 at 36.Google Scholar

Luskin, C., ‘Alternative Viewpoints about Biological Origins as Taught in Public Schools’ (2005) 47 Journal of Church & State583 at 591–4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenawalt, K., Does God Belong in Public Schools? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), p. 124.Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal1346CrossRef Google Scholar

Conkin, P. K., When all the Gods Trembled, Darwinism, Scopes, and American Intellectuals (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), p. 106.Google Scholar

Baker, H., ‘Competing Orthodoxies in the Public Square: Postmodernism's Effect on Church-State Separation’ (2004–2005) 20 The Journal of Law and Religion97.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ackerman, B., ‘The Stealth Revolution, Continued’ London Review of Books, Vol. 28, No. 3, 9 February 2006, 18 at 18.Google Scholar

Waldron, , ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’. The argument in this article builds upon a string of his earlier works, especially Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999) and The Dignity of Legislation (Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRef Google Scholar

Eisgruber, C. L., ‘Democracy and Disagreement: A Comment of Waldron's Law and Disagreement’ (2002) 6 Legislation and Public Policy35 at 41–5.Google Scholar

O'Keefe, K., The Average American, The Extraordinary Search for the Nation's Most Ordinary Citizen (New York: Public Affairs, 2005), p. 38.Google Scholar

McConnell, M. W., Garvey, J. H. and Berg, T. C., Religion and the Constitution (New York: Aspen Law & Business, 2002), p. 93.Google Scholar