Days of rest in multicultural societies: private, public, separate?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493843.009

9 - Days of rest in multicultural societies: private, public, separate?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2009

Ruth Gavison and

Nahshon Perez

Edited by

Peter Cane ,

Carolyn Evans and

Zoe Robinson

Show author details

Peter Cane: Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Carolyn Evans: Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Zoe Robinson: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Days of rest have not been given a central place in discussions of modern societies. However, regulation of days of rest provides a fascinating illustration of a variety of central issues in such societies. In Western societies, the issue of days of rest has usually been seen as concerned with the relationship between state and religion. Religions make demands about the way the day of rest, which is also a day of special worship, should be observed. So long as communities were religious and homogeneous, religious days of rest were generally observed. Usually, the right of members of other religions to their own observances was respected to some extent, at least in the private sphere. As societies became more secularized and plural, such arrangements began to be challenged both by secular members of the majority culture, who resented what they saw as religious coercion, and by members of minority cultures and religions, who saw an opportunity to reduce the burdens they had carried under the traditional arrangement. Both challenges invoked human rights discourse, demanding that arrangements respect individual as well as collective rights to freedom of religion and freedom from religion, and rights to culture. The subject is also discussed as an issue of minority rights, and as an aspect of the ideal of multiculturalism. In some countries, the issue has legal or even constitutional significance.

Type: Chapter
Information: Law and Religion in Theoretical and Historical Context , pp. 186 - 213

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493843.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983), pp: 184–96Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W., Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Jones, P., “Bearing the Consequence of Belief” in Goodin, R. and Pettit, P. (eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006), pp: 607–20Google Scholar

Heath, J., “Culture: Choice or Circumstances” (1998) 5:2 Constellations183–200CrossRef Google Scholar

Kekes, J., The Morality of Pluralism (Princeton University Press, 1993), pp: 53–75Google Scholar

Galston, W., “Value Pluralism and Liberal Political Theory” (1999) 93:4 American Political Science Review769–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Gavison, R., “Days of Worship and Days of Rest: The Case of Israel” in Brugger, W. and Karayanni, M. (eds.), Religion in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of German, Israeli, American and International Law (New York: Springer, 2007), pp: 379–414CrossRef Google Scholar

Heschel, A. J., The Sabbath – Its Meaning for Modern Man (New York, 1951)Google Scholar

Bacchiocchi, S., From Sabbath to Sunday (Rome: Biblical Perspectives, 1977), pp: 251–6Google Scholar

Straw, W. E., Origin of Sunday Observance (Washington DC, Review and Herald Publishing Association, 1939), p: 33Google Scholar

Hadaway, C. K.et al. “What the Polls Don't Show: A Closer Look at US Church Attendance” (1993) 58 American Sociological Review741–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Ashtor, E., A Social and Economic History of the Near East in the Middle Ages (Chicago University Press, 1974)Google Scholar

Risso, P., Merhcants and Faith: Muslims, Commerce and Culture in the Indian Ocean (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Lazarus-Yaffe, H., More Talks on Islam (Tel Aviv, 1985), p: 63 (in Hebrew)Google Scholar

Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983), pp: 184–96Google Scholar

Gavison, , “The Significance of Israel in Modern Jewish Identities” in Rephael, B.et al. (eds.), Contemporary Jewries: Convergence and Divergence (Leiden: Brill, 2003), pp: 118–29Google Scholar

Dorner, D., “Does Israel Have a Constitution?” (1999) 43 St Louis Law Journal1325Google Scholar

Edrey, Y. M., “The Israeli Constitutional Revolution/Evolution, Models of Constitutions, and a Lesson from Mistakes and Achievements” (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law77CrossRef Google Scholar

Levinson, St., “The Hallow Day” (2005) 155 New Law Journal1320.Google Scholar

King, A. J., “Sunday Laws in the 19th Century” (2000) 64 Albany Law Review675Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. A., Can Persecution Arise in America?, (Washington, DC: Review and Herald Publishing Company, 1967), pp: 6–7Google Scholar

Zablotsky, P., “After the Fall: The Employer's Duty to Accommodate Employee Religious Practices under Title VII after Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook” (1989) 50 University of Pittsburg Law Review513Google Scholar

McConnell, M., “Free Exercise Revisionism and the Smith Decision” (1990) University of Chicago Law Review1109CrossRef Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M., Woman and Human Development (Cambridge University Press, 2000), chapter 3CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, M., “On the Permissible Scope of Legal Limitations on the Freedom of Religion or Belief in the UK” (2005) 19 Emory International Law Review 1129, 1161–2Google Scholar

Lehnot, L. S., “Freedom of Religious Association: The Right of Religious Organizations to Obtain Legal Entity Status Under The European Convention”, 2002 Brigham Young University Law Review 563, 593–4Google Scholar

Saeed, A. and Saeed, H., Freedom of Religion, Apostasy and Islam (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), pp: 21–2Google Scholar

DalaCoura, K., Islam Liberalism and Human Rights (London: Tauris, 1998), p: 46Google Scholar

Sharify-Funk, Abdul Aziz Said Meena, Cultural Diversity and Islam (Landau, MD: University Press of America 2003), 24, 78Google Scholar

Landau, J., Jews in Egypt in the 19th Century (Jerusalem, 1967) 19–20Google Scholar

Patai, R., The Kingdom of Jordan (Princeton University Press, 1958) p: 223CrossRef Google Scholar

Parekh, B., Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. (New York: Palgrave, 2000)Google Scholar

Perez, N., “Should Multiculturalists Oppress the Oppressed?” (2002) 5(3) Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy51–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Young, M. I., “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship” (1989) 99(2) Ethics250–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W., “Do We Need a Liberal Theory of Minority Rights? A Response to Carens, Young, Parekh and Forst” (1997) 4(1) Constellations72–87CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, J., “Cultural Identity and Civic Responsibility” in Kymlicka, W. and Norman, W. (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp: 155–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, B., Culture and Equality (Oxford: Polity, 2001)Google Scholar

Kukathas, C., “Are there any Cultural Rights?” in Kymlicka, W. (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures (Oxford University Press, 1995), pp: 228–56Google Scholar

Yack, B., “The Myth of the Civic Nation” in Beiner, R. (ed.), Theorizing Nationalism (New York: SUNY Press, 1999), pp: 103–19Google Scholar

Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp: 107–62Google Scholar

Kymlicka, W., “Comments on Shachar and Spinner Halev: An Update from the Multiculturalism Wars” in Joppke, C. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Multicultural Questions (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp: 112–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Carens, J., Culture, Citizenship, and Community (Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Patten, A., “Liberal Neutrality and Language Policies” (2003) 31(4) Philosophy and Public Affairs356–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhargava, R., “What is Secularism For?” in Bhargrave, R. (ed.), Secularism and its Critics (Oxford University Press, 1998), pp: 486–542Google Scholar

Shils, E., Tradition (University of Chicago Press, 1981), Chapter 3, esp. pp: 163–75, 179, 185–7Google Scholar

Gellner, E., Nations and Nationalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983), pp: 140–3Google Scholar

Miller, D., Citizenship and National Identity (Cambridge: Polity, 2000), pp: 125–42Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A, “Social Solidarity and the Enforcement of Morals” (1967–8) 35 University of Chicago Law Review1–13CrossRef Google Scholar

Halev, J. Spinner, The Boundaries of Citizenship (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Pogge, T., “Accommodation Rights for Hispanics in the US” in Kymlicka, W. and Patten, A. (eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp: 105–23Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., “Sahin v. Turkey; Teacher Head-scarf Case: ECHR and German Constitutional Court Decisions on Wearing of Islamic Head-Scarves” 100 American Journal of International Law (2006) 186Google Scholar

Beller, E. T., “The Headscarf Affair: The Conseil d'Etat on the Role of Religion and Culture in French Society” (2004) 39 Texas International Law Journal 581, 581–6, 609–23Google Scholar

Machado, J. E. M., “Freedom of Religion: A View from Europe” (2005) 10 Roger Williams University Law Review 451, 488–95Google Scholar

Lund, C., “A Matter of Constitutional Luck: The General Applicability Requirement in Free Exercise Jurisprudence” (2003) 26 Harvard Journal of Law and Policy627–65Google Scholar

Caney, S., “Equal Treatment, Exceptions and Cultural Diversity” in Kelly, P. (ed.), Multiculturalism Reconsidered (Oxford: Polity, 2002), pp: 81–101Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., “Rights as Trumps” in Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984), pp: 153–68Google Scholar

Gans, C., The Limits of Nationalism (Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRef Google Scholar