Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T18:56:59.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2019

Sohaira Z. M. Siddiqui
Sohaira Z. M. Siddiqui
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Qatar
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Politics under the Abbasids
An Intellectual Portrait of al-Juwayni
 , pp. 291 - 306
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

ʿAbd al-Jabbār, Abū al-Ḥasan. al-Mughnī fī Abwāb al-Tawḥīd wa-l-ʿadl. Edited by Muṣṭafā Ḥilmī, Muḥammad. Cairo: al-Dār al-Miṣriyya Li-l-Taʾlīf wa-l-Nashr, 1960–69.Google Scholar
Abyārī, ʿAlī b. Ismāʿīl. al-Taḥqīq wa-l-bayān fī sharḥ al-burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Doha: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya, 2013.Google Scholar
Āmidī, Sayf al-Dīn. al-Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat Muḥammad ʿAlī Ṣubayḥ, 1917.Google Scholar
Anṣārī, Abū al-Qāsim. al-Ghunya fī ʿilm al-kalām. Edited by ʿAbd al-Hādī, Muṣṭafā Ḥasnayn. Cairo: Dār al-Salām, 2010.Google Scholar
Baghdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir b. Ṭāhir al-Tamīmī. Uṣūl al-dīn. Istanbul: Maṭbaʿat al-Dawla, 1928.Google Scholar
Baghdādī, ʿAbd al-Qāhir b. Ṭāhir al-Tamīmī. Al-Farq bayna al-Firak: Moslem Schisms and Sects. Translated by Seelye, Kate C.. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Baghdādī,  al-Khaṭīb. al-Faqīh wa-l-mutafaqqih. Edited by Yusūf al-ʿAzāzī, ʿĀdil b.. Mecca: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī, 1996.Google Scholar
Bākharzī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī b. al-Ḥasan b. ʿAlī. Dumyat al-qaṣr wa-ʿuṣrat ahl al-ʿaṣr. Kuwait: Dār al-ʿUrūba, 1985.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib b. Kitāb Tamhīd al-awāʾil wa-talkhīṣ al-dalāʾil. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-Sharqiyya, 1957.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Tamhīd fī al-radd ʿalā al-mulḥida al-muʿaṭṭila wa-l-rāfiḍa wa-l-khawārij wa-l-muʿtazila. Edited by McCarthy, Richard J.. Baghdad: Publications of al-Ḥikma University of Baghdad, 1958.Google Scholar
Bāqillānī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. al-Ṭayyib b. al-Taqrīb wa-l-irshād. Beirut: al-Risāla, 1993.Google Scholar
Baṣrī, Abū al-Ḥusayn. al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Damascus: al-Maʿhad al-ʿIlmī al-Faransī li-l-Dirāsāt al-ʿArabiyya, 1964.Google Scholar
Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Tārīkh al-Islām wa-wafayāt al-mashāhīr wa-l-aʿlām. Edited by ʿAbd al-Salām Tadmurī, ʿUmar. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1990.Google Scholar
Dhahabī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Siyar aʿlām al-nubalāʾ. Edited by al-ʿAmrawi, Muḥibb al-Dīn Abū Saʿīd ʿUmar b. Gharāma. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1997.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Shifāʾ al-ghalīl. Baghdad: Maṭbāʿa al-Irshād, 1971.Google Scholar
Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmidal-Mustaṣfā. Mecca: al-Jāmīʿa al-Islāmiyya, 2008.Google Scholar
Ḥājj, Ibn al-Amīr. al-Kāmil fī ikhtiṣār al-Shāmil. Edited by al-Nāṣir ʿAbd al-Munʿim, ʿAbd. Cairo: Dār al-Salām, 2010.Google Scholar
Ibn al-Athīr, ʿIzz al-Dīn. al-Kāmil fī al-tārīkh. Edited by ʿAbd al-Salām Tadmurī, ʿUmar. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1997.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAsākir, ʿAlī b. al-Ḥasan. Tabyīn kadhib al-muftarī fī-mā nusiba ilā al-imām Abī al-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī. Edited by Zāhid al-Kawtharī, Muḥammad. Damascus: al-Qudsī, 1928.Google Scholar
Ibn ʿAsākir, ʿAlī b. al-Ḥasan. Tārīkh madīnat Dimashq. Edited by Shīrī, ʿAlī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1995.Google Scholar
Ibn al-ʿImād, . Shadharāt al-dhahab fī akhbār man dhahab. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Tijārī li-l-Ṭibāʿa wa-l-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 1966.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl b. ʿUmar. al-Bidāya wa-l-nihāya. Edited by ʿAbd al-Wahhāb al-Futayḥ, Aḥmad. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1992.Google Scholar
Ibn Khallikān, . Wafayāt al-aʿyān wa-anbāʾ abnāʾ al-zamān. Edited by ʿAbbās, Iḥsān, Qāḍī, Wadād, and ʿIzz al-Dīn ʿUmar Aḥmad, Mūsā. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1977.Google Scholar
Ibn Mattawayh, . Kitāb al-majmūʿ fī al-muḥīṭ bi-l-taklīf. Edited by Houben, J. J.. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1965.Google Scholar
Ibn Taghrībardī, Abū al-Maḥāsin Yūsuf. al-Nujūm al-zāhira fī mulūk Miṣr wa-l-Qāhira. Cairo: al-Muʾassasa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma li-l-Taʾlīf wa-l-Ṭibāʿa wa-l-Nashr, 1963.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn Aḥmad b. ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm. Kitāb al-Radd ʿalā al-manṭiqiyyīn. Edited by Sharaf al-Dīn al-Kutubī, ʿAbd al-Ṣamad. Bombay: Qayyimah Press, 1949.Google Scholar
ʿIyād, Al-Qāḍī. Tartīb al-madārik wa-taqrīb al-masālik li-maʿrifat Aʿlām Madhhab Mālik. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1998.Google Scholar
Jawzī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b. ʿAlī Ibn. al-Muntaẓam fī tārīkh al-mulūk wa-l-umam. Edited by ʿAbd al-Qādir ʿAṭā, Muḥammad and Shams al-Dīn, Ibrāhīm. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1992.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. Mughīth al-khalq fī tarjīḥ al-qawl al-ḥaqq. Cairo: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Miṣriyya, 1934.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-ʿAqīda al-Niẓāmiyya. Edited by Zāhid al-Kawtharī, Muḥammad. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1948.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. Irshād ilā qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād. Edited by Mūsā, Muḥammad Yusūf and ʿAlī ʿAbd al-Munʿim ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd, Shaykh. Cairo: Maktabat al-Khānjī, 1950.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Shāmil fī uṣūl al-dīn. Edited by al-Nashshār, ʿAlī, ʿAwn, Fayṣal, and Mukhtār, Suhayr. Alexandria: Munshaʾāt al-Maʿārif, 1969.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Burhān fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Edited by al-ʿAẓīm al-Dīb, ʿAbd. Cairo: Dār al-Anṣār, 1979; reprint, Doha: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya, 1997.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Kāfiya fī al-jadal. Edited by Maḥmūd, Fawqiyya Ḥusayn. Cairo: ʿIsā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1979.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. Ghiyāth al-umam fī iltiyāth al-ẓulam. Edited by al-ʿAẓīm al-Dīb, ʿAbd. Qatar: Kulliyyat al-Sharīʿa, 1980.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Shāmil fī Uṣūl al-Dīn: The Exposition of al-Bāqillānī’s Commentary on the Kitāb al-Lumaʿ; Some Additional Portions of the Text. Edited by Frank, Richard. Tehran: McGill University/Tehran University, 1981.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-Talkhīṣ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Edited by Allāh al-Nībālī, ʿAbd and al-ʿAmrī, Shubbayr. Mecca: Maktabat Dār al-Bāz, 1996.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. al-ʿAqīda al-Niẓāmiyya. Edited by al-Zubaydī, Muḥammad. Beirut: Dār al-Sabīl al-Rashād, 2003.Google Scholar
Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʿālī ʿAbd al-Malik. Nihāyat al-maṭlab fī dirāyat al-madhhab. Edited by al-ʿAẓīm al-Dīb, ʿAbd. Doha: Dār al-Minhāj/Wizārat al-Awqāf al-Qaṭariyya, 2007.Google Scholar
Maḥallī, Jalāl al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-Waraqāt fī ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh ʿalā Waraqāt Abī al-Maʿālī Imām al-Ḥaramayn. Mecca: Maktabat Nazār Muṣṭafā al-Bāz, 1996.Google Scholar
Malāḥimī, Rukn al-Dīn Ibn. al-Fāʾiq fi Uṣūl al-dīn. Edited by Madelung, Wilferd and McDermott, Martin. Tehran and Berlin: Iranian Institute of Philosophy and Freie Universität Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
Māwardī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAli b. Muḥammad b. Ḥabīb. al-Aḥkām al-sulṭāniyya. Kuwait: Maktaba Dār Ibn Qutayba, 1989.Google Scholar
Muqaddasī, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad Shams al-Dīn. Aḥsan al-taqāsīm fī maʿrifat al-aqālīm. Edited by de Goeje, M. J.. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1967.Google Scholar
Nadīm, Muḥammad Isḥāq Ibn. Kitāb al-Fihrist. Edited by Flügel, Gustav. Beirut: Khayat, 1964.Google Scholar
Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. al-Maḥṣūl fī ʿilm uṣūl al-fiqh. Edited by Jābir al-ʿAlwānī, Ṭāhā. Riyadh: Imam Ibn Saʿūd Islamic University, 1979.Google Scholar
Sarakhsī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. Edited by al-Wafāʾ al-Afghānī, Abū. Hyderabad: Lajnat Iḥyāʾ al-Maʿārif al-Nuʿmāniyya, 1953.Google Scholar
Shāfiʿī,  Muḥammad b. Idrīs. Kitāb al-Umm. Bulaq: al-Maṭbaʿa al-Kubrā al-Amīriyya, 1907–8.Google Scholar
Shahrastani, Muhammad B. ʿAbd al-Karim. Kitab al-milal wa-l-nihal: Book of Religious and Philosophical Sects. Edited by Cureton, William. London: Society for the Publication of Oriental Texts, 1842–46.Google Scholar
Shahrazūrī, Abū ʿAmr ʿUthmān b. ʿAbd al-Rahmān. Muqaddimat Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ fī ʿulūm al-ḥadīth. Cairo: Dār al-Maʿārif, 1990.Google Scholar
Subkī, Tāj al-Dīn. Ṭabaqāt al-Shāfiʿiyya al-kubrā. Edited by Muḥammad al-Ṭaḥānī, Maḥmūd and al-Ḥilw, ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad. Cairo: ʿĪsā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1965.Google Scholar
Suyūṭī, Abū al-Faḍl ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad Jalāl al-Dīn al-Khuḍayrī. al-Ashbāh wa-l-naẓāʾir. Cairo: Maʿhad al-Makhṭūṭāt al-ʿArabiyya, 1998.Google Scholar
ʿUthmān, ʿAbd Al-Karīm, ed. Sharḥ al-Uṣūl al-Khamsa. Cairo: Maktabat Wahba, 1965.Google Scholar
Zarkashī, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad b. Bahādur. al-Baḥr al-muḥīṭ fī uṣūl al-fiqh. Edited by al-Qādir ʿAbd Allāh al-ʿĀnī, ʿAbd, 5:240. Kuwait: Dār al-Ṣafwa li-Wizārat al-Awqāf, 1992.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abdullah, Ismail Haji. “The Influence of Imam al-Juwaynī on the Theology of Imam al-Ghazālī.” PhD diss., University of St. Andrews, 1996.Google Scholar
Adang, Camilla. “Ibn Ḥazm on Homosexuality: A Case-Study of Ẓāhirī Legal Methodology.” Al-Qanṭara 24, no. 1 (2003): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adang, Camilla. “‘This Day I Have Perfected Your Religion for You’: A Ẓāhirī Conception of Religious Authority.” In Speaking for Islam: Religious Authority in Muslim Societies, edited by Krämer, Gudrun and Schmidtke, Sabine. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Ahmad Atif. Structural Interrelations of Theory and Practice in Islamic Law. Leiden: Brill, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Ahmad Atif. The Fatigue of the Sharīʿa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali,  Kecia. Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Quran, Hadith and Jurisprudence. London: Oneworld, 2016.Google Scholar
Allard, Michel. Le Problème des attributs divins dans la doctrine d’al-Ashari et ses premiers grands disciples. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1965.Google Scholar
Allard, Michel. Textes apologetiques de Guwayni (m. 478/1085). Beirut: Dar el-Mashreq, 1968.Google Scholar
Anjum, Ovamir. Politics, Law, and Community in Islamic Thought: The Taymiyyan Moment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Arberry, A. J. Revelation and Reason in Islam. New York: Routledge, 1957.Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said. “Crisis of the Imamate and the Institution of Occultation in Twelver Shiʿism: A Sociohistorical Perspective.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28, no. 4 (1996): 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjomand, Said. “The Law, Agency and Policy in Medieval Islamic Society: Development of the Institutions of Learning from the Tenth to the Fifteenth Century.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41, no. 2 (1999): 262–93Google Scholar
Arjomand, Said. The Shadow of God and the Hidden Imam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. “The Sources of Knowledge.” In The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology, edited by Moser, Paul K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Bedir, Murteza. “An Early Response to al-Shāfiʿī: ʿĪsā ibn Abān on the Prophetic Report.” Islamic Law and Society 9, no. 3 (2002): 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, David. “The Muʿtazilite Movement (I): The Origins of the Muʿtazila.” In Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Schmidtke, Sabine, 142–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Berkey, Jonathan. The Formation of Islam: Religion and Society in the Near East, 600–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, Lawrence. “Recent Work on the Internalism–Externalism Controversy.” In The Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, edited by Dancy, Jonathan, Sosa, Ernest, and Setup, Matthias, 33–42. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Brown, Daniel. “The Triumph of Scripturalism: The Doctrine of Naskh and Its Modern Critics.” In The Shaping of an American Islamic Discourse: A Memorial to Fazlur Rahman, edited by Waugh, Earle and Denny, Frederick, 49–66. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Brown, Jonathan. The Canonization of al-Bukharī and Muslim: The Formation and Function of the Sunnī Ḥadīth Canon. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jonathan. “Did the Prophet Say It or Not? The Literal, Historical and Effective Truth of Hadith.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 129, no. 2 (2009): 259–85.Google Scholar
Brown, Jonathan. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. London: Oneworld, 2009.Google Scholar
Burton, John. The Sources of Islamic Law: Islamic Theories of Abrogation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, John. “Abrogation.” In Encyclopaedia of the Qurʼān, edited by McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, 11–19. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford. The Ghaznavids. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford. “The Political and Dynastic History of the Iranian World, Vol. 5: The Saljuk and Mongol Periods.” In Cambridge History of Iran, edited by Boyle, J. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Clifford. Islamic Dynasties. Edinburgh: Clark Constable, 1980.Google Scholar
Böwering, Gerhard. Islamic Political Thought: An Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Bulliet, Richard. “A Quantitative Approach to Medieval Muslim Biographical Dictionaries.” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 13 (1970): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulliet, Richard. The Patricians of Nishapur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Bulliet, Richard. “The Political-Religious History of Nishapur in the Eleventh Century.” In Islamic Civilization 950–1150, edited by Richards, D. S., 71–91. Oxford: Bruno Cassirer, 1973.Google Scholar
Bulliet, Richard. “Numismatic Evidence for the Relationship between Ṭughril Beg and Chaghrī Beg.” In Near Eastern Numismatics, Iconography, Epigraphy and History: Studies in Honor of George C. Miles, edited by Kouymjian, Dickran K., 289–96. Beirut: American University of Beirut, 1974.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Charles. The Political Aspects of Islamic Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Muhsin S. Mahdi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Cahen, Claude. “The Historiography of the Seljuqid Period.” In Historians of the Middle East, edited by Lewis, Bernard and Holt, Peter, 59–78. London: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas. “The Rule of Law Revival.” Foreign Affairs 77, no. 2 (1998): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, David. Studies in Muslim Apocalyptic. Princeton: Darwin Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Coulson, Noel J. A History of Islamic Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review 4, no. 28 (1983): 4–68.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. “Shūrā as an Elective Institution.” Quaderni di Studi Arabi 19 (2001): 3–39.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. God’s Rule – Government and Islam: Six Centuries of Medieval Islamic Political Thought. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
al-Dīb, ʿAbd al-ʿAzīm. Imām al-Ḥaramayn. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam, 1981.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Eerik. An Introduction to the Science of the Ḥadīth. Reading: Garnet, 2006.Google Scholar
Dodge, Bayard. Al-Azhar: A Millennium of Muslim Learning. Washington, DC: Middle East Institute, 1974.Google Scholar
Donner, Fred. “The Historical Context of the Qur’an.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Qur’an, edited by McAuliffe, Jane D., 21–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Donner, Fred. “The Qurʾān in Recent Scholarship – Challenges and Desiderata.” In The Qurʾān in Its Historical Context, edited by Reynolds, Gabriel S., 29–50. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Donner, Fred. “The Historian, the Believers, and the Qurʾān.” In New Perspectives on the Qurʾān, edited by Reynolds, Gabriel S., 25–37. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Dutton, Yasin. “ʿAmal v. Ḥadīth in Islamic Law: The Case of Sadl al-Yadayn (Holding One’s Hands by One’s Sides) When Doing the Prayer.” Islamic Law and Society 3, no. 1 (1996): 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, YasinThe Origins of Islamic Law: The Quran, the Muwaṭṭaʾ and Madinan ʿAmal. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Dutton, YasinOriginal Islam: Mālik and the Madhhab of Madina. London: Routledge, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Fadl, Khaled Abou. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld, 2001.Google Scholar
El Omari, Racha. “Accommodation and Resistance: Classical Muʿtazilites on Ḥadīth.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 71, no. 2 (2012): 234–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Omari, Racha. “The Muʿtazilite Movement (I): The Origins of the Muʿtazila.” In Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Schmidtke, Sabine, 130–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
El Omari, Racha. The Theology of Abū l-Qāsim al-Balkhī/al-Kaʻbī (d. 319/931). Leiden: Brill, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Shamsy, Ahmed. “The Wisdom of God’s Law: Two Theories.” In Islamic Law in Theory: Studies on Jurisprudence in Honor of Bernard Weiss, edited by Gleave, Robert and Reinhart, Kevin, 19–37. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
El Shamsy, Ahmed. The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
El Shamsy, Ahmed. “Bridging the Gap: Two Early Texts of Islamic Legal Theory,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 137, no. 3 (2017): 505–36.Google Scholar
Emon, Anver. “The Most Likely to Know the Law: Objectivity, Authority and Interpretation in Islamic Law.” Hebraic Political Studies 4, no. 4 (2009): 431–38.Google Scholar
Emon, Anver. Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law: Dhimmīs and Others in the Empire of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad. “The Social Logic of Taqlīd and the Rise of the Mukhtaṣar.” Islamic Law and Society 3, no. 2 (1996): 193–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasāʾī, Ḥasan-i. History of Persia under Qajar Rule. Translated by Heribert Busse. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Remarks on the Early Development of Kalām.” In Congresso di studi arabi e islamici, Atti del terzo Congresso di studi arabi e islamici. Ravello, 1–6 settembre 1966. Napoli: Istituto universitario orientale, 1967.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Several Fundamental Assumptions of the Baṣran School of the Muʿtazila.” Studia Islamica, no. 3 (1971): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Reason and Revealed Law: A Sample of Parallels and Divergences in Kalām and Falsafa.” In Recherches d’Islamologie: Recueil d’articles offerts à Georges C. Anawati et Louis Gardet, edited by Anawati, Georges C. and Gardet, Louis, 123–38. Louvain: Peeters, 1978.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Two Islamic Views of Agency,” In La Notion de liberté au Moyen Âge: Islam, Byzance, Occident, edited by Makdisi, George, Sourdel, Dominique, and Sourdel-Thomine, Janine, 37–49. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1985.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Knowledge and Taqlīd: The Foundations of Religious Belief in Classical Ashʿarism.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 109, no. 1 (1989): 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard. Creation and the Cosmic System: Al-Ghazālī and Avicenna. Heidelberg: Winter, 1992.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. Al-Ghazālī and the Ashʿarite School. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Currents and Countercurrents in the Muʿtazila, Ashʿarites and al-Ghazālī.” In Islam: Essays on Scripture, Thought and Society: A Festschrift in Honour of Anthony H. Johns, edited by Riddell, Peter G. and Street, Tony, 113–34. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. “The Non-Existent and the Possible in Classical Ashʿarite Thinking.” Mélanges de l’Institut dominicain d’études orientales, 24 (2000): 1–37.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. Early Islamic Theology: The Muʿtazilites and al-Ashʿarī. Vol. 2 of Texts and Studies on the Development and History of Kalām, edited by Gutas, Dimitri. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Frank, Richard. Classical Islamic Theology: The Ashʿarites. Vol. 3 of Texts and Studies on the Development and History of Kalām, edited by Gutas, Dimitri. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Fricker, Miranda. “Skepticism and the Genealogy of Knowledge: Situating Epistemology in Time.” In Social Epistemology, edited by Haddock, Adrian, Millar, Alan, and Pritchard, Duncan, 51–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Richard, ed. Histories of Nishapur. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books Classics, 1985.Google Scholar
Gibb, Hamilton. “Al-Māwardī’s Theory of the Caliphate.” In Studies on Islamic Civilization, edited by Shaw, Stanford and Polk, William, 291–302. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Gibb, Hamilton. “The Heritage of Islam in the Modern World (1).” International Journal of Middle East Studies 1, no. 1 (1970): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, Hamilton. Studies on the Civilization of Islam. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimaret, Daniel. “Pour servir à la lecture des Masāʾil d’Abū Rašīd al-Nīsābūrī.” Bulletin d’études orientales, no. 60 (2011): 11–38.Google Scholar
Gilliot, Claude. “Quand la théologie s’allié à l’histoire: Triomphe et échec du rationalisme musulman à travers l’oeuvre d’al-Juwaynī.” Arabica 39, no. 2 (1992): 241–60.Google Scholar
Gleave, Robert. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin. “Why Social Epistemology Is Real Epistemology.” In Social Epistemology, edited by Haddock, Adrian, Millar, Alan, and Pritchard, Duncan, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Goldziher, Ignaz. The Ẓāhirīs: Their Doctrine and Their History. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Griffel, Frank. Al-Ghazalī’s Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture: The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʿAbbasid Society. London: Routledge, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, Rosalind. “Al-Jubbāʾī, al-Ashʿarī and the Three Brothers: The Uses of Fiction.” Muslim World 75, nos. 3–4 (2007): 132–61.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Caliphs, Jurists and the Saljūqs in the Political Thought of Juwaynī.” Muslim World 74 (1984): 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16, no. 1 (1984): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “On the Authoritativeness of Sunni Consensus.” International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 18 (1986): 427–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “On the Origins of the Controversy about the Existence of Mujtahids and the Gate of Ijtihād.” Studia Islamica, no. 63 (1986): 129–41.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “The Development of Logical Structure in Sunni Legal Theory.” Der Islam 64 (1987): 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Non-Analogical Arguments in Sunnī Juridical Qiyās.” Arabica 36 (1989): 286–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Logic, Formal Arguments and Formalization of Arguments in Sunnī Legal Thought.” In Islamic Law and Jurisprudence, edited by Heer, Nicholas, 3–31. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Was al-Shafiʿi the Master Architect of Islamic Jurisprudence?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 25, no. 4 (1993): 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Iftaʾ and Ijtihad in Sunni Legal Theory: A Developmental Account.” In Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas, edited by Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Messick, Brinkley, and Powers, David S., 33–44. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “The Authenticity of Prophetic Ḥadîth: A Pseudo-Problem.” Studia Islamica, no. 89 (1999): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “From Regional to Personal Schools of Law? A Reevaluation.” Islamic Law and Society 8, no. 1 (2001): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Halm, Heinz. “Der Wesir al-Kunduri und die Fitna von Nishapur.” Die Welt des Orients 6, 1971: 205–33.Google Scholar
Halm, Heinz. Shiʿism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. “The Argument for the Authority of Ijmāʿ.” Islamic Studies 10, no. 1 (1971): 39–52.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. “The Justification of Qiyās.” Islamic Studies 20, no. 3 (1981): 201–26.Google Scholar
Heck, Paul. “Jovayni, Emām-al-Ḥaramayn.” In Encyclopaedia Iranica (New York, 1996– ), www.iranicaonline.org/articles/jovayni-emam-al-haramayn.Google Scholar
Heck, Paul. Skepticism in Classical Islam. London: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heemskerk, Margaretha T. Suffering in Muʿtazilite Theology. Leiden: Brill, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heemskerk, Margaretha T.  “ʿAbd al-Jabbār b. Aḥmad al-Hamadhānī.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, 3rd edition, edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Hess, Andrew. “Islamic Civilization and the Legend of Political Failure.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 44, no. 1 (1985): 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hītū, Ḥasan, al-Imām al-Shīrāzī. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1980.Google Scholar
Hourani, George. “Two Theories of Value in Medieval Islam.” Muslim World 50, no. 4 (1969): 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hourani, George. Islamic Rationalism: The Ethics of ʿAbd al-Jabbār. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hourani, George. Reason and Tradition in Islamic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hurvitz, Nimrod. “Schools of Law and Historical Context: Re-Examining the Formation of the Ḥanbalī Madhhab.” Islamic Law and Society 7, no. 1 (2000): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvitz, Nimrod. “From Scholarly Circles to Mass Movements: The Formation of Legal Communities in Islamic Societies.” American Historical Review 108, no. 4 (2003): 985–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvitz, Nimrod. Competing Texts: The Relationship between al-Māwardī’s and Abū Yaʿlāʾs “al-Aḥkām al-Sultāniyya.” Cambridge, MA: Islamic Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School, 2007.Google Scholar
Ibish, Yusuf. “Life and Works of al-Bāqillānī.” Islamic Studies 4, no. 3 (1965): 225–36.Google Scholar
Ibish, Yusuf. The Political Doctrine of al-Bāqillānī. Beirut: American University of Beirut, 1966.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Ahmed Fekry. Pragmatism in Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sherman. Islamic Law and the State: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Shihāb al-Dīn al-Qarāfī. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman. “Taqlīd, Legal Scaffolding and the Scope of Legal Injunctions in Post-Formative Theory.” Islamic Law and Society 3, no. 2 (1996): 165–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman. “The Alchemy of Domination: Some Ashʿarite Responses to Muʿtazilite Ethics.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 21, no. 2 (1999): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Sherman. “Literalism, Empiricism and Induction: Apprehending and Concretizing Islamic Law’s Maqāsid al-Sharīʿa in the Modern World.” Michigan State Law Review (2006): 1469–86.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. Contingency in a Sacred Law: Legal and Ethical Norms in the Muslim Fiqh. Leiden: Brill, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurgen, Paul. “The Seljuk Conquest(s) of Nishapur: A Reappraisal.” Iranian Studies 38, no. 4 (2005): 575–77.Google Scholar
Ka Ka Khel, Muhammad Nazeer. “The Conceptual and Institutional Development of Shura in Early Islam.” Islamic Studies 19, no. 4 (1980): 271–82.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Hugh. The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Hugh. When Baghdad Ruled the Muslim World: The Rise and Fall of Islam’s Greatest Dynasty. Boston: De Capo Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Kerr, Malcolm. Islamic Reform. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid, trans. Al-Shāfiʿī’s Risāla. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1987.Google Scholar
Klopfer, Helmut. Das Dogma des Imam al-Haramain al-Juwayni und sein Werk al-Aqidat an-Nizamiya. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1958.Google Scholar
Klopfer, Helmut. ed. al-Shāmil Fī Uṣūl al-dīn. Cairo: Dār al-ʿArab, 1959.Google Scholar
Laher, Suheil Ismail. “Twisted Threads: Genesis, Development and Application of the Term and Concept of Tawātur in Islamic Thought.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2014.Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann. State and Government in Medieval Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lambton, Ann. “The Dilemma of Government in Islamic Persia: The Siyāsat-nāma of Niẓām al-Mulk.” Iran 22 (1984): 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Joseph. Early Islamic Legal Theory: The Risāla of Muḥammad ibn Idrīs al-Shāfiʿī. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Joseph. “Some Preliminary Observations on al-Šāfiʿī and Later Uṣūl al-Fiqh: The Case of the Term Bayān.” Arabica 55, nos. 5–6 (2008): 505–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Joseph. “The Prophet as Lawgiver and Legal Authority.” In The Cambridge Companion to Muḥammad, edited by Brockopp, Jonathan, 83–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Joseph. trans. The Epistle on Legal Theory: A Translation of al-Shāfiʿī’s Risālah. New York: New York University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lucas, Scott. “Where Are All the Legal Ḥadīth?” Islamic Law and Society 8, no. 3 (2001): 408–31.Google Scholar
Lucas, Scott. “Principles of Traditionist Jurisprudence Reconsidered.” Muslim World 100, no. 1 (2010): 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Richard. The Theology of al-Ashʿarī. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique, 1953.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Duncan B. Development of Muslim Theology, Jurisprudence, and Constitutional Theory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1903.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. “Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd edition, edited by Bearman, P., Bianquis, Th., Bosworth, C. E., Van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W. P.. Leiden: Brill, 1960–2005.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. “The Spread of Maturidism and the Turks.” In Religious Schools and Sects in Medieval Islam, 109–68. London: Valorium Reprints, 1985.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. Religious Trends in Early Iran. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. Review of Before Revelation, by Kevin Reinhart. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60, no. 1 (1997): 127–28.Google Scholar
Madelung, Wilferd. Al-Ṣāḥib Ibn ʿAbbād: Promoter of Rational Theology: Two Mutazili Kalam Texts from the Cairo Geniza. Edited by Madelung, Wilferd and Schmidtke, Sabine. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “Muslim Institutions of Learning in Eleventh Century Baghdād.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 24 (1960): 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. “Ashʿarī and the Ashʿarites in Islamic Religious History, Part 1.” Studia Islamica, no. 17 (1962): 37–80;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. “Ashʿarī and the Ashʿarites in Islamic Religious History, Part 2.” Studia Islamica, no. 18 (1963): 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. “Madrasa and University in the Middle Ages.” Studia Islamica, no. 32 (1970): 255–64.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “The Marriage of Tughril Beg.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 1 (1970): 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makdisi, George. The Rise of Colleges: Institutions of Learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “The Juridical Theology of Shāfiʿī: Origins and Significance of Uṣūl al-Fiqh.” Studia Islamica, no. 59 (1984): 40–43.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin. Al-Farābī and the Foundations of Islamic Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Maḥmūd, Fawqiyya. al-Juwaynī: Imām al-Ḥaramayn. Cairo: al-Dār al-Miṣriyya, 1964.Google Scholar
Malamud, Margaret. “The Politics of Heresy in Medieval Khurasan: The Karramiyya in Nishapur.” Iranian Studies 27, nos. 1–4 (1994): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, Margaret. “Sufi Organizations and Structures of Authority in Medieval Nishapur.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 26, no. 3 (1994): 427–42.Google Scholar
Massignon, Loius. The Passion of al-Hallāj. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Messick, Brinkley, and Powers, David. “Muftīs, Fatwas and Islamic Legal Interpretation.” In Islamic Legal Interpretation: Muftis and Their Fatwas, edited by Masud, Muhammad Khalid, Messick, Brinkley, and Powers, David, 3–32. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Melchert, Christopher. The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law, 9th–10th Centuries C.E. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Melchert, Christopher. “The Traditionist-Jurisprudents and the Framing of Islamic Law.” Islamic Law and Society 8, no. 3 (2001): 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchert, Christopher. “Qur’anic Abrogation across the Ninth Century: Shāfiʿī, Abū ʿUbaid, Muḥāsibī, and Ibn Qutaibah.” In Studies in Islamic Legal Theory, edited by Weiss, Bernard G., 75–98. Leiden: Brill, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchert, Christopher. “Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal and the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 6, no. 2 (2004): 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, Hanna. Politics and Revelation: Māwardī and After. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mitter, Ulrike. “Unconditional Manumission of Slaves in Early Islamic Law: A Ḥadīth Analysis.” Der Islam 78, no. 1 (2001): 35–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Tilman. History of Islamic Theology. Princeton: Markus Wiener, 2009.Google Scholar
Nasser, Shady Hekmat. The Transmission of the Variant Readings of the Qurʾān: The Problem of Tawātur and the Emergence of Shawādhdh. Leiden: Brill, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, Martin. “The Confluence and Construction of Traditions: Al-Qushayrī and the Intersection of Qurʾānic Exegesis, Theology and Sufism.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 2009.Google Scholar
Opwis, Felicitas. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law. Leiden: Brill, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormsby, Eric. Review of Before Revelation, by Reinhart, Kevin. Islamic Law and Society 5, no. 1 (1998): 118–23.Google Scholar
Osman, Amr. The Ẓāhirī Madhhab: A Textualist Theory of Islamic Law. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy, “Governance as Political Theory.” Jerusalem Papers in Regulation and Governance 22 (2010): 1–23.Google Scholar
Peters, Johannes Maria. God’s Created Speech: A Study in the Speculative Theology of ʿAbd al-Jabbār. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Rudolph. Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Powers, David. Studies in the Qurʾān and Ḥadīth: The Formation of the Islamic Law of Inheritance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Powers, David. “The Exegetical Genre Nāsikh al-Qurʾān wa Mansūkhuhu.” In Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qurʾān, edited by Rippin, Andrew, 117–38. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Qadhi, Yasir. “Salafī-Ashʿarī Polemics of the 3rd and 4th Islamic Centuries.” Muslim World 106, no. 3 (2016): 433–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabb, Intisar. “Islamic Legal Minimalism: Legal Maxims and Lawmaking When Jurists Disappear.” In Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought: Studies in Honor of Professor Hossein Modarressi, edited by Sayeed, Asma, Haider, Najam, Cook, Michael, and Rabb, Intisar, 145–66. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Ramic, Sukri. Language and the Interpretation of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 2005.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Kevin. Before Revelation: The Boundaries of Muslim Moral Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtues.” Law Quarterly Review 93 (1977): 195–211.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. “The New Governance: Governing without Government.” Political Studies 44 (1996): 652–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, D. S. The Annals of the Saljuk Turks: Selections from al-Kāmil fi’l Tārīkh of ʿIzz al-Dīn b. al-Athīr. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Rippin, Andrew. “Al-Zuhrī, Naskh al-Qurʾān and the Problem of Early Tafsīr Texts.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47, no. 1 (1984): 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rippin, Andrew. “The Exegetical Literature of Abrogation: Form and Content.” In Studies in Islamic and Middle Eastern Texts and Traditions in Memory of Norman Calder, edited by Hawting, G. R., Mojaddedi, J. A., and Samely, Alexander, 213–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rippin, Andrew. “Revelation and Canon.” In Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation, edited by Wansbrough, John. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajid. Niẓām al-Mulk: His Contribution to Statecraft, Political Theory and the Art of Government. Lahore: Sheikh Muhammad Ashraf, 1978.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Erwin. Political Thought in Medieval Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. Knowledge Triumphant. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Sabra, Adam. “Ibn Ḥazm’s Literalism: A Critique of Islamic Legal Theory – Part 1.” Al-Qanṭara 28, no. 1 (2007): 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabra, Adam. “Ibn Ḥazm’s Literalism: A Critique of Islamic Legal Theory – Part 2.” Al-Qanṭara 28, no. 2 (2007): 307–48.Google Scholar
Saflo, Mohammad. Al-Juwaynī’s Thought and Methodology, with a Translation and Commentary on “Lumaʿ al-Adilla.” Berlin: Schwarz, 2000.Google Scholar
Safian, Yasmin. “Necessity (ḍarūra) in Islamic Law: A Study with Special Reference to the Harm Reduction Programme in Malaysia.” PhD diss., University of Exeter, 2010.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph. The Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence. N.p.: American Council of Learned Societies, 2008.Google Scholar
Schmitdke, Sabine. “Early Ashʿarī Theology: Abū Bakr al-Bāqillānī (d. 403/1013) and His Hidayāt al-Mustarshidīn.” Bulletin d’études orientales 60 (2011): 39–71.Google Scholar
Schmitdke, Sabine. “The Muʿtazilite Movement (III): The Scholastic Phase.” In Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Schmidtke, Sabine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Shabana, Ayman. Custom in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ʿUrf and ʿĀdah in the Islamic Legal Tradition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafiq, Muhammad. “The Role and Place of Shura in the Islamic Polity.” Islamic Studies 23, no 4 (1984): 419–41.Google Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. The Teleological Ethics of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī. Leiden: Brill, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. “The Argument from Ignorance and Its Critics in Medieval Arabic Thought.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 23 (2013): 175–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. “From al-Ghazālī to al-Rāzī: 6th/12th Century Developments in Muslim Philosophical Theology.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 15 (2015): 144–79.Google Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. “Theories of Ethical Value in Kalām: A New Interpretation.” In Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Schmidtke, Sabine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Muhammad Zubayr. Hadith Literature: Its Origin, Development and Special Features. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society, 1993.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Sohaira. “Power vs. Authority: Al-Juwaynī’s Intervention in Pragmatic Political Thought.” Journal of Islamic Studies 28, no. 2 (2017): 193–220.Google Scholar
Snyder, Franklin. “Nomos, Narrative and Adjudication: Toward a Jurisgenetic Theory of Law.” William and Mary Law Review 40, no. 5 (1999): 1623–729.Google Scholar
Sobers-Khan,  Nur. Slaves without Shackles: Forced Labor and Manumission in the Galata Court Registers, 1560–1572. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spectorsky, Susan A. “Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal’s Fiqh.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 102, no. 3 (1982): 461–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Devin. “Muḥammad Dāwūd al-Ẓāhirī’s Manual of Jurisprudence.” In Studies in Islamic Legal Theory, edited Weiss, Bernard, 99–158. Leiden: Brill, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50 (1998): 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiele, Jan. “Between Cordoba and Nīsābūr: The Emergence and Consolidation of Ashʿarism (Fourth–Fifth/Tenth–Eleventh Century).” In Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, edited by Schmitdke, Sabine, 225–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker,  Judith. In the House of the Law: Gender and Islamic Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Vahid, Hamid. “Externalism/Internalism.” In The Routledge Companion to Epistemology, edited by Bernecker, Sven and Pritchard, Duncan, 144–55. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Ḳadariyya.” In The Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd edition, edited by Bearman, P., Bianquis, Th., Bosworth, C. E., Van Donzel, E., and Heinrichs, W. P.. Leiden: Brill, 1960–2005.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Ein unbekanntes Fragment des Naẓẓām.” In Der Orient in der Forschung: Festschrift fur Otto Spies zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Hoenerbach, Wilhelm, 171–201. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1967.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Early Islamic Theologians on the Existence of God.” In Islam and the Medieval West, edited by Semaan, Khalil I., 64–81. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1980.Google Scholar
van Ess, Josef. “Sufism and Its Opponents: Reflections on Topoi, Tribulations and Transformations.” In Islamic Mysticism Contested: Thirteen Centuries of Controversies and Polemics, edited by de Jong, Frederick and Radtke, Bernd, 22–44. Leiden: Brill, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Moral Agents and Their Deserts: The Character of Muʿtazilite Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vishanoff, David. The Formation of Islamic Hermeneutics: How Sunnī Legal Theorists Imagined a Revealed Law. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society, 2011.Google Scholar
Walker, Paul. “Faṭimid Institutions of Learning.” Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 34 (1997): 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, Montgomery. Free Will and Predestination in Early Islam. London: Luzac, 1948.Google Scholar
Watt, Montgomery. Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Watt, Montgomery. “Suffering in Sunnite Islam.” Studia Islamica, no. 50 (1979): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Bernard. Review of Before Revelation, by Kevin Reinhart. Journal of the American Oriental Society 119, no. 2 (1999): 317–18.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard. The Spirit of Islamic Law. Atlanta: University of Georgia Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernard. The Search for God’s Law: Islamic Jurisprudence in the Writings of Sayf al-Dīn al-Āmidī. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wensinck, A. J. The Muslim Creed. New York: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “Avicenna and the Avicennian Tradition.” In The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy, edited by Adamson, Peter and Taylor, Richard C., 92–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisnovsky, Robert. “One Aspect of the Avicennian Turn.” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004): 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymann-Landgraf, Umar Abd-Allah. Mālik and Medina. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Young, Walter. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law. Cham: Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, Muhammad Qasim. “Ahl al-ḥall wa-l-ʿaqd.” In Encyclopedia of Islam, 3rd edition, edited by Fleet, Kate, Krämer, Gudrun, Matringe, Denis, Nawas, John, and Rowson, Everett. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
al-Zuḥaylī, Muḥammad. al-Imām al-Juwaynī: Imām al-Ḥaramayn. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 1992.Google Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory. Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×