CAG : Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca (1882–1909) Cambridge.Google Scholar

FRHist. : Cornell, T.J. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

FDS : Hülser, K. (1987–1988) Fragmente der Dialektik der Stoiker. Cambridge Google Scholar

FIRA : Riccobono, S. and others (1968–1972 [1940–1941]) Fontes iuris Romani Antejustiniani. Cambridge Google Scholar

FSS: Ferrary, J.-L., Schiavone, A. and Stolfi, A. (2018) Quintus Mucius Scaevola. Opera. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garbarino: Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II secolo A.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Giannantoni: Giannantoni, G. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lenel: Lenel, O. (1889) Palingenesia iuris civilis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

LS: Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge.Google Scholar

LSJ: Liddell, H.G., R. Scott and H.S. Jones (1996) A Greek-English Lexicon. With a Revised Supplement. Cambridge.Google Scholar

RE : Wissowa, G., Kroll, W. and Mittelhaus, K. (eds) (1893–1980) Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar

SVF : Arnim, H. von (1903–1905) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta 1–3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aelian, , Historical Miscellany : Wilson, N.G. (ed., tr.) (1997) Aelian. Historical Miscellany. Cambridge Google Scholar

Aelius, , Fragments : Bottiglieri, A. (2019) ‘Sextus Aelius’, in Bottiglieri, A., A Manzo, F. Nasti and G. Viarengo Antiquissima iuris sapientia. Cambridge: 297–321.Google Scholar

Anaximenes of Lampsacos [?], Rhetoric to Alexander : Fuhrmann, M. (ed.) (2000) Anaximenes. Ars rhetorica quae vulgo fertur Aristotelis ad Alexandrum, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Appian, , Civil Wars : Mendelssohn, L. and Viereck, P. (eds) (1905) Appiani Historia Romana 2, 2nd ed.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Arcesilaus, , Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–94, and Vezzoli, S. (2016) Arcesilao di Pitane. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Aristophanes of Byzantium: Nauck, A. (1848) Aristophanis Byzantii grammatici Alexandrini fragmenta . Halle, , and Slater, W.J. (1986) Aristophanis Byzantii fragmenta, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, On the Heaven : Moraux, P. (ed.) (1965) Aristote. Du ciel. Cambridge Google Scholar

Aristotle, Metaphysics : Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1924) Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics : Susemihl, F. and Apelt, O. (eds) (1912) Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, Physics: Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1936) Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, Politics : Dreizehnter, A. (ed.) (1970) Aristoteles’ Politik. Cambridge Google Scholar

Aristotle, Rhetoric : Kassel, R. (ed.) (1976) Aristotelis Ars rhetorica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Aristotle, On the Soul: Siwek, P. (ed.) (1965) Aristotelis De anima Graece et Latine.Google Scholar

Aristotle, Topics : Brunschwig, J. (ed., tr.) (1967–2007) Aristote. Topiques. Cambridge Google Scholar

Aristotle, Fragments : Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis opera volumen tertium: librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Cambridge.Google Scholar

[Aristotle], Constitution of Athens : Chambers, M. (ed.) (1994) Aristoteles. ΑΘΗΝΑΙΩΝ ΠΟΛΙΤΕΙΑ, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Aspasius, , Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics : Heylbut, G. (ed.) (1889) Aspasii in Ethica Nicomacheia quae supersunt commentaria. CAG 19.1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Athenaeus: Olson, S.D. (ed., tr.) (2006–2012) Athenaeus. The Learned Banqueters. Cambridge, and, for books 8–15, Olson, S.D. (ed.) (2019–2020) Athenaeus Naucratites Deipnosophistae. Berlin.Google Scholar

Augustine, On Christian Doctrine : Martin, J. (ed.) (1982) Sancti Aurelii Augustini De doctrina christiana, De vera religione. Cambridge Google Scholar

Augustine, On the City of God : Dombart, B. and Kalb, A. (eds.) (1955) Sancti Aurelii Augustini De civitate dei. Cambridge Google Scholar

[Augustine], On Rhetoric : Halm, C. (ed.) (1863) Rhetores Latini minores. Cambridge: 135–51.Google Scholar

Carneades, , Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1985) ‘Weitere Akademiker heute (Fortsetzung von Lustr. 26, 7-94): Von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39–148.Google Scholar

Cato the Elder, Fragments: see Jordan, H. (ed.) (1840) Catonis quae exstant. Leipzig, and Malcovati, H. (1976) Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae, 4th ed., Turin: 12–97.Google Scholar

Charisius, , Science of Grammar : Barwick, K. and Kühnert, F. (eds) (1964 [1925]), Charisius. Ars grammatica, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Appropriate Actions : Winterbottom, M. (ed.) (1994) M. Tulli Ciceronis De officiis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Brutus : Jahn, O., Kroll, W. and Kytzler, B. (eds.), Cicero. Brutus, 6th ed., Cambridge 1962, and Douglas, A.E. (ed.) (1966) M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cicero, , In Defence of Cluentius : in Clark, A.C. (ed.) (1905), M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Divination : Pease, A.S. (ed.) (1955 [1920–1923]), M. Tulli Ciceronis De divinatione, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Ends : Schiche, T. (ed.) (1915) M. Tulli Ciceronis De finibus bonorum et malorum. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Friendship : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 317–65.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Invention: Bornecque, H. (ed., tr.) (1932) Cicéron. De l’invention. Paris.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Laws : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 155–266.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Letters to Atticus : Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed., tr.) (1999) Cicero. Letters to Atticus. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , Letters to Friends : Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed., tr.) (2001) Cicero. Letters to Friends. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , Lucullus : Schäublin, C. (ed., tr.) (1995) Cicero. Akademische Abhandlungen. Lucullus. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , In Defence of Murena : in Clark, A.C. (ed.) (1905) M. Tulli Ciceronis orationes 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On Old Age : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 267–315.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On the Nature of the Gods : Pease, A.S. (ed.) (1955–1958) M. Tulli Ciceronis De natura deorum. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , Orator : Westman, R. (ed.) (1980) Cicero. Orator. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On the Orator : Wilkins, A.S. (ed.) (1902) M. Tullius Cicero. De Oratore. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , On the Paradoxes of the Stoics : Molager, J. (ed., tr.) (1971) Cicéron. Les paradoxes des Stoïciens. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cicero, , On the res publica : in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) (2006) M. Tulli Ciceronis De re publica, De legibus, Cato maior de senectute, Laelius de amicitia. Cambridge: 1–154.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Topics : Reinhardt, T. (ed.) (2003) Cicero’s Topica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Tusculan Disputations 1–2: Pohlenz, M. (ed.) (1918) M. Tulli Ciceronis scripta quae manserunt omnia 44: Tusculanae disputationes. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Varro : in Plasberg, O. (ed.) (1922) Cicero: Academicorum reliquiae cum Lucullo. Cambridge: 1–25.Google Scholar

Cicero, , Fragments on philosophy : Garbarino, I. (1984) M. Tulli Ciceronis fragmenta ex libris philosophicis, ex aliis libris deperditis, ex scriptis incertis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clement of Alexandria, Miscellanies 1–6: Stählin, O. and Früchtel, L (eds) (1960) Clemens Alexandrinus 2: Stromata Buch 1–6 , 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Coruncanius, , Fragments: Viarengo, G. (2019) ‘Tiberius Corunicianus’ in Bottiglieri, A., A Manzo, F. Nasti and G. Viarengo Antiquissima iuris sapientia. Cambridge: 167–89.Google Scholar

Crantor of Soli, Fragments: Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–43.Google Scholar

Crates of Mallus, Fragments : Broggiato, M. (2001) Cratete di Mallo. I frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar

Crates of Thebes, Fragments: in Giannantoni, (1990), vol. 2, 523–75.Google Scholar

Critolaus of Phaselis, Fragments : Wehrli, F. (1969b) Hieronymos von Rhodos. Kritolaos und seine Schüler. Rückblick: Der Peripatos in vorchristlicher Zeit. Register, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

David, , Introduction : in Busse, A. (ed.) (1904) Davidis Prolegomena philosophiae et In Porphyrii isagogen commentarium. CAG 18.2. Cambridge: 1–79.Google Scholar

Digest: in Mommsen, T. (ed.) (1911) Corpus iuris civilis 1, 12th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Diogenes of Sinope, Fragments: in Giannantoni (1990), vol. 2, 227–509.Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertius: Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013) Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diomedes, , Science of Grammar : in Keil, H. (ed.) (1857) Grammatici Latini 1. Cambridge: 297–590.Google Scholar

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Roman Antiquities : Jacoby, C. (ed.) (1885–1925) Dionysi Halicarnasensis Antiquitatum Romanarum quae supersunt. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dionysius Thrax, The Science of Grammar : Pecorella, G.B. (ed.) (1962) Dionisio Trace. ΤΕΧΝΕ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗ. Cambridge.Google Scholar

[Dionysius Thrax] Scholia on Dionysius Thrax : Hilgard, A. (ed.) (1901) Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticam. Grammatici graeci 1.3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Epicurus, , Fragments : Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Epiphanius, , On Faith : in Holl, K. and Dummer, J. (eds) (1985) Epiphanius 3: Panarion haer. 65–80, De fide, 2nd ed. Cambridge: 496–526.Google Scholar

Eudorus of Alexandria, Fragments: Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar

Eusebius of Casarea, Preparation for the Gospel: Mras, K. (ed.) (1954) Eusebius Werke 8: Die Praeparatio evangelica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Eustathius of Thessalonica, Commentary on the Odyssey : Stallbaum, J.G. (ed.) (1826) Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Odysseam 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gaius, , Teaching Manual : Seckel, E. and Kübler, B. (eds) (1939) Gai Institutiones, 8th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gellius, , Attic Nights : Holford-Strevens, L. (ed.) (2020) Auli Gellii Noctes Atticae libri. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hecato, , Fragments : Gomoll, H. (1933) Der stoische Philosoph Hekaton. Cambridge Google Scholar

Hermagoras of Temnos, Fragments : Matthes, D. (1962) Hermagorae Temnitae testimonia et fragmenta. Cambridge, and Woerther, F. (2012) Hermagoras. Fragments et témoignages. Paris.Google Scholar

[Hippolytus of Rome?], Refutation of All Heresies : Litwa, M.D. (ed., tr.) (2016) Refutation of all heresies. Cambridge Google Scholar

Isidorus of Sevilla, Etymology : Lindsay, W.M. (ed.) (1911) Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Etymologiarum sive originum libri xx. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Justinian, Digest, see Digest.Google Scholar

Justinian, Teaching Manual: in Mommsen, T. (ed.), Corpus iuris civilis 1, 12th edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Juvenal, , Satires : in Clausen, W.V. (ed.) (1992) A. Persi Flacci et D. Iuni Iuvenalis Saturae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lactantius, , Divine Teaching Manual : Brandt, S. (ed.) (1890) L. Caeli Firmiani Lactanti opera omnia 1. Cambridge Google Scholar

Livy, : Livy’s work is quoted from the OCT editions.Google Scholar

Marius, Victorinus, Science of Grammar : Mariotti, I. (ed.) (1967) Marii Victorini Ars grammatica. Cambridge Google Scholar

Olympiodorus, , Commentary on the Gorgias : Westerink, L.G. (ed.) (1970) Olympiodori in Platonis Gorgiam commentaria. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Origen, , Commentary on Matthew : Klostermann, E. (ed.) (1935–1941) Origenes. Matthäuserklärung. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Panaetius, , Fragments : Straaten, M. van (1962) Panaetii Rhodii fragmenta, 3rd ed. Cambridge, Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze. Naples, and Vimercati, E. (2002) Panezio. Testimonianze e frammenti. Milan.Google Scholar

Pausanias, : Spiro, F. (ed.) (1903) Pausaniae Graeciae descriptio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Peripatetics, Fragments: Sharples, R.W. (2010) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Philodemus of Gadara, History of the Stoics : Dorandi, T. (ed., tr.) (1994) Philodemus. Storia dei filosofi. Cambridge Google Scholar

Philodemus of Gadara, On Property Management : Tsouna, V. (ed., tr.) (2012) Philodemus. On Property Management. Cambridge Google Scholar

Philodemus of Gadara, On the Stoics: Dorandi, T. (ed., tr.) (1982) ‘Filodemo. Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339)’, Cronache ercolanesi 12: 92–133.Google Scholar

Philodemus of Gadara, [ On Choices and Avoidances] : Indelli, G. and Tsouna, V. (eds, tr.) (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and avoidances]. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Plato, : Plato’s dialogues are quoted from the Oxford Classical Texts (OCT) editions.Google Scholar

Platonists, Fragments: Boys-Stones, G. (2017) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD, Cambridge, and Dörrie, H. and M. Baltes (1987–1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Pliny the Elder, Natural History : Mayhoff, C. (ed.) (1899–1909) C. Plini Secundi Naturalis historiae libri xxxvii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pliny, the Younger, Letters : Mynors, R.A.B. (ed.) (1966) C. Plini Caecili Secundi epistularum libri decem. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Life of Aemilius Paullus: in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1993) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 2.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Stuttgart: 184–222.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Lives of Agis and Cleomenes: in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Stuttgart: 352–415.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Life of Aratus : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. Gärtner, H.. Cambridge: 264–317.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Life of Cato the Elder : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (2000) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 1.1, 5th ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 287–423.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Lives of the Gracchi : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 416–63.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Life of Pyrrhus : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1996) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.1, 2nd ed. with corr. H. Gärtner. Cambridge: 153–203.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Life of Sulla : in Ziegler, K. (ed.) (1973) Plutarchus. Vitae parallelae 3.2, 2nd ed. Cambridge: 131–93.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , On the Generation of the Soul in the Timaeus : in Cherniss, H. (ed.) (1976) Plutarch. Moralia 13.1, Cambridge: 131–345.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Political Instructions : in Hubert, C., Pohlenz, M. and Drexler, M. (eds) (1971) Plutarchi moralia 5.1. Cambridge: 58–126.Google Scholar

Plutarch, , Sayings of the Romans : in Nachstädt, W., Sieveking, W. and Titchener, J.B. (eds) (1971) Plutarchi moralia 2. Cambridge: 70–109.Google Scholar

Pollux of Naucratis, Thesaurus : Bethe, E. (ed.) (1900–1937) Pollucis Onomasticon. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Polybius, , Histories : Dindorf, L. and Büttner-Wobst, T. (eds) (1889–1905) Polybios. Historiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pomponius, Handbook: see Digest (at. 1.2.2).Google Scholar

Posidonius, , Fragments : Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I.G. (eds) (1972) Posidonius 1. The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rutilius Rufus, Fragments: in FRHist. no. 21.Google Scholar

Seneca the Elder, Controversies : Winterbottom, M. (ed., tr.) (1974) The Elder Seneca. Cambridge Google Scholar

Seneca, , On Benefits : in Hosius, C. (ed.) (1914) L. Annaei Senecae de beneficiis libri VII de clementia libri II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Seneca, , On Clemency : Malaspina, E. (ed.) (2016) L. Annaeus Seneca. De clementia libri duo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Seneca, , Letter(s) : Reynolds, L.D. (ed.) (1965) L. Annaei Senecae ad Luculium epistulae morales. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Empiricus, Sextus, Against the Professors 1–6: Mutschmann, H. and Mau, I.. (eds) (1954) Sexti Empirici opera 3: Adversus mathematicos libros 1–6, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Empiricus, Sextus, Against the Professors 7–11: Mutschmann, H. (ed.) (1914) Sexti Empirici opera 2: Adversus dogmaticos libros quinque (Adv. Mathem. 7–11). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Empiricus, Sextus, Outlines of Pyrrhonism: Mutschmann, H. and Mau, I. (eds) (1958) Sexti Empirici opera 1: ΠΥΡΡΩΝΕΙΩΝ ΥΠΟΤΥΠΩΣΕΩΝ, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stobaeus, : Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds) (1884–1923) Ioannis Stobaei anthologium. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Strabo, : Radt, S. (ed., tr.) (2002–2011) Strabons Geographika. Cambridge Google Scholar

Suetonius, , Caesar : Ihm, M. (ed.) (1907) C. Suetoni Tranquilli De vita Caesarum libri. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Suetonius, , On the Teachers of Grammar and Rhetoric: Kaster, R. (ed., tr.) (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquilius. De grammaticis et rhetoribus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Suidas, : Adler, A. (ed.) (1928–1938) Suidae lexicon. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tacitus, , Yearbooks : Borzsák, S. (ed.) (1992) Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt 1: Ab excessu Divi Augusti libri I–VI. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Terence, , The Eunuch : in Barsby, J. (ed., tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge: 305–443.Google Scholar

Terence, , The Self-Tormentor : in Barsby, J. (ed., tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge: 171–303.Google Scholar

Thespis, : Pickard-Cambridge, A.W. and Webster, T.B.L. (1962), Dithyramb. Cambridge, and Snell, B., ‘Thespis’ (1971) in his Tragicorum Graecorum fragmenta 1, Göttingen: 61–7.Google Scholar

Timon of Phlius, Fragments : Di Marco, M. (1989) Timone di Fliunte. Cambridge. Rome, and Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum, Berlin: 369–95.Google Scholar

Varro, , Rural Matters : Flach, D. (ed., tr.) (2006) Marcus Terentius Varro. Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar

Varro, , On the Latin Language : De Melo, W.D.C. (ed., tr.) (2019) Varro: De lingua Latina. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paterculus, Velleius, Roman History : Watt, W.S. (ed.) (1998) Vellei Paterculi Historiarum ad M. Vinicium consulem libri duo, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Xenocrates, , Fragments : Isnardi Parente, M. and Dorandi, T. (2012) Senocrate e Ermodoro. Testimonianze e frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar

Abel, K. (1987) ‘100 Jahre Hekaton-Forschung’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft NF 13: 101–20.Google Scholar

Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi. Testimonianze. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alesse, F. (2017) ‘Filosofia stoica e classe dirigente romana nel II secolo a.C. Panezio, Blossio, gli Scipioni’, in Philosophari, ed. Vesperini, P.. Cambridge: 77–88.Google Scholar

Alexander, M.C. (1990) Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Cambridge Google Scholar

Algra, K.A. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero. The ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus ’, in Assent and Argument, eds Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Cambridge: 107–39.Google Scholar

Altheim, F. (1929) ‘Persona’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 27: 35–52.Google Scholar

Althoff, J. and Zeller, D. (2006) Die Worte der sieben Weisen. Cambridge Google Scholar

Ankum, H. (1974) ‘Towards a rehabilitation of Pomponius’, in noster , Daube , ed. Watson, A.. Edinburgh: 1–14.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1989) ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Philosophia togata 1, eds. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Cambridge: 151–73.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 187–223.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E. (1958) ‘Modern moral philosophy’, Philosophy 33: 1-19.Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, V. (1970 [1938]) ‘La règle de droit et la loi dans l’antiquité classique’, reprinted in his Rariora. Cambridge: 231–69.Google Scholar

Archi, G.G. (1970) ‘Interpretatio legis – interpretatio iuris – interpretatio legum’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung. Romanistische Abteilung 87: 1–49.Google Scholar

Armgardt, M. (2008) ‘Zur Bedingungsdogmatik im klassischen römischen Recht und zu ihren Grundlagen in der stoischen Logik’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 76: 219–35.Google Scholar

Arnim, H. von (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa mit einer Einleitung: Sophistik, Rhetorik, Philosophie in ihrem Kampf um die Jugendbildung . Cambridge.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Cambridge Google Scholar

Astin, A.E. (1967) Scipio Aemilianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Astin, A.E. (1978) Cato the Censor. Cambridge Google Scholar

Atkins, E.M. (tr.) and Griffin, M. (ed.) (1991) Cicero. On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Atkins, E.M. (2000) ‘Cicero’, in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 477–516.Google Scholar

Atkins, J.W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Atkins, J.W. (2015) ‘Zeno’s Republic, Plato’s Laws, and the early development of Stoic natural law theory’, Polis 32: 166–90.Google Scholar

Atkins, J.W. (2018) Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Audring, G. and Brodersen, K. (2008) Quellen zur Wirtschaftstheorie der griechischen Antike. Cambridge Google Scholar

Austin, J. (1995 [1832]) The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, S.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ax, W. (1996) ‘Pragmatic morphology: Varro’s defence of analogy in Book 9 of his De lingua Latina’, in Ancient Grammar: Content and Context, ed. Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A.. Cambridge: 105–19.Google Scholar

Babusiaux, U. (2015) Wege zur Rechtsgeschichte: Römisches Erbrecht. Cambridge Google Scholar

Backhaus, R. (2006) ‘Ethik und Recht in Cicero, de officiis 3.12.50ff.’, in Humaniora, eds Kern, B.-R. and others. Cambridge: 3–23.Google Scholar

Bakker, F.A. (2016) Epicurean Metereology. Cambridge Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. (2016) The Peripatetics. Cambridge Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic. Princeton. Google Scholar

Barlow, J.J. (2012) ‘Cicero on property and the state’, in Cicero’s Practical Philosophy, ed. Nicgorski, W.. Cambridge: 212–41.Google Scholar

Barlow, J.J. (2018) ‘Scipio Aemilianus and Greek ethics’, Classical Quarterly 64: 112–27.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2015 [1986]) ‘Is rhetoric an art?’, reprinted in Barnes (2015), 80–105.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1999) ‘An introduction to Aspasius’, in Aspasius: the Earliest Extant Commentary on Aristotle’s Ethics, eds Alberti, A. and Sharples, R.W.. Cambridge: 1–50, reprinted in Barnes (2011), 212–60.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1997) ‘Roman Aristotle,’ in Philosophia togata 2, eds Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Cambridge: 1–69, reprinted in Barnes (2015), 359–406.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2011) Essays in Ancient Philosophy 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2015) Essays in Ancient Philosophy 4. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds) (1989) Philosophia togata 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Baronowski, D.W. (2011) Polybius and Roman Imperialism. Cambridge Google Scholar

Barsby, J. (tr.) (2001) Terence 1. Cambridge Google Scholar

Barta, H. (2010) ‘Graeca non leguntur’? Cambridge Google Scholar

Bauman, R.A. (1983) Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bauman, R.A. (1985) Lawyers in Roman Transitional Politics. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bauman, R.A. (1989) Lawyers and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bauman, R.A. (1996) Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome, Cambridge Google Scholar

Beard, M., and Crawford, M. (1999) Rome in the Late Republic, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar

Becker, J.C. (1964) ‘The influence of Roman Stoicism upon the Gracchi economic land reforms’, La parola del passato 19: 125–34.Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (1976) Die Wissenschaftslehre im Zivilrecht des Q. Mucius Scaevola pontifex. Cambridge Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (1978) ‘Institutionelles und prinzipielles Denken im römischen Privatrecht’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 95: 187–231, reprinted in Behrends (2004), 15–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrends, O. (1980a) ‘Prinzipat und Sklavenrecht’, in Rechtsentwicklung und Rechtswissenschaft, ed. Immenga, U.. Cambridge: 53–88, reprinted in Behrends (2004), 417–55.Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (1980b) ‘Tiberius Gracchus und die Juristen seiner Zeit – die römische Jurisprudenz gegenüber der Staatskrise des Jahres 133 v. Chr.’, in Das Profil des Juristen in der europäischen Tradition, eds Luig, K. and Liebs, D.. Cambridge: 25–121.Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (1982) Die fraus legis. Cambridge Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (2004) Institut und Prinzip. Cambridge Google Scholar

Behrends, O. (2008) ‘Die geistige Mitte des römischen Rechts. Die Kulturanthropologie der skeptischen Akademie’, Zeitschrift für Rechtsgeschichte der Savigny-Stiftung. Romanistische Abteilung 125: 25–107.Google Scholar

Benelli, E. (ed.) (2009) Thesaurus linguae Etruscae 1: Indice lessicale, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Benferhat, Y. (2005) Ciues Epicurei. Cambridge Google Scholar

Beresford, A. (tr.) (2020) Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge Google Scholar

Berger, A. (1932) ‘Tabulae duodecim’, RE 4A: cols. 1900–49.Google Scholar

Berger, A. (1940) ‘Tabulae duodecim’, RE Suppl. 7: cols. 1275–6.Google Scholar

Berger, A. (1953) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Law. Philadelphia (Pa).Google Scholar

Berthold, R.M. (1984) Rhodes in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bett, R. (tr.) (2005) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2012) Vertere. Un’antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bichlin, R. (1991) ‘Über die Geschichte des Hellenismus-Begriffs in der deutschen Historiographie. Leitende Gedanken, Probleme, Perspektiven’, in Hellenismos, ed. Said, S.. Cambridge: 363–86.Google Scholar

Bieber, M. (1930) ‘Maske’, RE 14: cols. 2070–120.Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. (1979) Der Kyniker Demetrius. Cambridge Google Scholar

Blank, D. (2005) ‘Varro’s anti-analogist’, in Language and Learning, eds Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 210–38.Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1995) Die Verfassung der römischen Republik, 8th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Blom, H. van der (2016) Oratory and Political Career in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, F. von and Düll, R. (1937) ‘Persona’, RE 19: cols. 1036–41.Google Scholar

Bod, R. (2013) A New History of the Humanities, tr. Richards, L.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boeri, M.D. (2013) ‘Natural law and world-order in Stoicism’, in Nature and the Best Life, ed. Rosi, G.. Cambridge: 183–223.Google Scholar

Boeri, M.D. and Salles, R. (2014) Los filósofos estoicos. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bollansée, J. (1999) Hermippus of Smyrna and His Biographical Writings. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bona, F. (1973) ‘Sulla fonte di Cicero, De oratore 1,56, 239–240 e sulla chronologia dei ‘Decem libelli’ di P. Mucio Scevola’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 39: 425–80.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015) Il platonismo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bonfante, G. and Bonfante, L. (2003) The Etruscan Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Boyle, A.J. (2006) An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. Cambridge Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2017) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to 250 AD. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bremer, F.P. (1898) Iurisprudentiae Antehadrianae quae supersunt 2.1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brennan, T.C. (2000) The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bretone, M. (1971) ‘Publius Mucius et Brutus Manilius qui fundaverunt ius civile’, in La critica del testo, ed. Pardisi, B.. Cambridge: 103–16.Google Scholar

Bretone, M. (1982 [1970]) Tecniche e ideologie dei giuristi romani, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Bretone, M. (2008) Ius controversum nella giurisprudenza classica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brett, A.S. (1997) Liberty, Right and Nature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Breyer, G. (1993) Etruskisches Sprachgut im Lateinischen unter Ausschluss des spezifisch onomastischen Bereiches. Cambridge Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (tr.) (2006) Cicero. On Academic Scepticism. Cambridge Google Scholar

Broggiato, M. (2001) Cratete di Mallo. I frammenti. Cambridge Google Scholar

Broggiato, M. (2014) Filologia e interpretazione a Pergamo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Broggini, G. (1959) ‘Ius lexque esto’, in Ius et lex, eds Isele, E., Schwander, V. and Broggini, G.. Cambridge: 23–44.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2008) ‘On the ancient background of Grotius’s notion of natural law’, Grotiana 29: 1–24.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2011a) ‘On law and equity: the Stoic view’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 128: 17–38.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2011b) ‘Polybius on Stoic tyche ’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 51: 111–32.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2012) ‘Musil’s search for ethics’, Monatshefte 104: 511–26.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2015) ‘Ulpian’s appeal to nature: Roman law as universal law’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 83: 60–76.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2017) ‘“Richer than the Greeks”: Cicero’s constitutional thought in Republic 1’, in Ciceros Staatsdenken, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge: 33–46.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2018) ‘On the meaning of ‘system’ in the Common and Civil Law traditions: two approaches to legal unity’, Utrecht Journal for International and European Law, 45–55.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2019) ‘Funerals, faces and Hellenistic philosophy: on the origins of the concept of person in Rome’, in Persons, ed. Lolordo, A.. Cambridge: 19–45.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2020a) ‘Divine and human will in Imperial Stoicism’, in Fate, Providence, and Free Will, eds Brouwer, R. and Vimercati, E.. Cambridge: 31–48.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2020b) ‘Socratic ethics and ignorance in the Stoa’, in The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Arenson, K.. Cambridge: 107–118.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (2021) ‘Cynic origins of natural law?’, in State and Nature in Antiquity, eds Adamson, P. and Rapp, C.. Cambridge: 159–80.Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. (unpublished) ‘Rhetoric, philosophy and law in the late Roman Republic’ (paper presented at the conference ‘Rhetoric of Philosophers’ at the Czech Academy of Sciences, March 2020).Google Scholar

Brouwer, R. and Vimercati, E. (eds) (2020) Fate, Providence, and Free Will. Cambridge Google Scholar

Brown, P.G.M. (2014) ‘The beginnings of Roman comedy’, in The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy, eds Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A.C.. Cambridge: 401–8.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1995 [1977]) ‘Épicure et le problème du “langage privé”’, reprinted in his Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1995 [1988]) ‘Le problème de l’heritage conceptuel dans le scepticisme: Sextus Empiricus et la notion de κριτήριον’, reprinted in his Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Cambridge: 289–319.Google Scholar

Brunt, P.A. (2013) Studies in Stoicism, eds Griffin, M. and Samuels, A.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bryen, A.Z. (2014) ‘Law in many pieces’, Classical Philology 109: 346–65.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1960) ‘Platon oder Pythagoras. Zum Ursprung des Wortes “Philosophie”’, Hermes 88: 159–77.Google Scholar

Cairns, J.W. and Du Plessis, P.J. (eds) (2010) The Creation of the ius commune. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Camporeale, G. (2003 [2000]) Die Etrusker, tr. Schareika, H.. Cambridge Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1989 [1987]) The Vanished Library, tr. Ryle, M.. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cannata, C.A. (1997) Per una storia della scienza giuridica europea 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, L. (2014 [2009]). Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth, tr. Kopp, L.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Carcaterra, A. (1966) Le definizioni dei giuristi romani. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (2001) M. Terentius Varro. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cascione, C. (2018) ‘Il contesto storico della legislazione decemvirale’, in XII Tabulae, ed. Cursi, M.F.. Cambridge: 1–30.Google Scholar

Castner, C.J. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans. Cambridge Google Scholar

Catana, L. (2008) The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cavarzere, A. (2000) Oratoria a Roma. Rome.Google Scholar

Cavazza, F. (1981) Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico. Cambridge Google Scholar

Cerami, P. (1998) ‘Il sistema ofiliano’, in La codificazione del diritto dall’antico al moderno. Cambridge: 83–119.Google Scholar

Chaumartin, F.-R. (1985) Le De Beneficiis de Seneque, sa signification philosophique, politique et sociale. Cambridge Google Scholar

Chiusi, T.J. (2005) ‘Strukturen des römischen Eigentums im Spiegel rhetorisch-philosophischer Texte Ciceros’, in Was ist Eigentum?, eds Eckl, A. and Ludwig, B.. Cambridge: 59–72.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1975) Bildung und Gesellschaft. Cambridge Google Scholar

Chroust, A.-H. (1962) ‘The miraculous disappearance and recovery of the corpus aristotelicum’, Classica et mediaevalia 23: 50–67.Google Scholar

Clarke, M.L. (1971) Higher Education in the Ancient World. London.Google Scholar

Cohn, L. (1896) ‘Aristophanes aus Byzanz’, RE 2: cols. 994–1005.Google Scholar

Corbino, A. (2014) ‘Caso, diritto e regula. Limiti della funzione normativa del caso deciso nella visione romana’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 61: 47–82.Google Scholar

Cornell, T.J. (1995) The Beginnings of Rome. Cambridge Google Scholar

Crawford, M.H. (ed.) (1996) Roman Statutes. Cambridge Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on definitions’, in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D.. Cambridge: 359–423.Google Scholar

Crönert, W. (1906) Kolotes und Menedemos. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cursi, M.F. (ed.) (2018) XII Tabulae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. (2004) Ethics without Principles, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. (2017) ‘Moral particularism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online).Google Scholar

Dawson, D. (1992) Cities of the Gods. Cambridge Google Scholar

De Ste, . Croix, G.E.M. (1980) The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World. Cambridge Google Scholar

Desbordes, F. (1995) ‘Les débuts de la grammaire à Rome’, Laelius 15: 125–37.Google Scholar

Desbordes, F. (1990) Idées romains sur l’écriture. Cambridge Google Scholar

Desmond, W.D. (2006) The Greek Praise of Poverty. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2007) Ancient Greek Scholarship. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2016) ‘The reception of Aristotle in Antiochus and Cicero’, in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. Falcon, A.. Cambridge: 183–201.Google Scholar

Dillon, J.M. and Long, A.A. (eds) (1988) The Question of ‘Eclecticism’. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dillon, S. (2006) Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Domingo, R. (2018) Roman Law. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dominik, W. (2017) ‘The development of Roman rhetoric’, in The Oxford Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. MacDonald, M.J.. Cambridge: 159–72.Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. (2011) ‘The rise and fall of the Socratic problem’, in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Morrison, D.R.. Cambridge: 1–23.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike 4. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dovring, F. and others (eds) (1965 [1951]), Hugo de Groot. Inleidinge tot de Hollandsche rechts-geleerdheid, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Droysen, J.G. (1836) Geschichte des Hellenismus. Cambridge Google Scholar

Du Plessis, P. (ed.) (2016) Cicero and the Law. Cambridge Google Scholar

Du Plessis, P. (2020) Burkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 6th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K. (eds) (2016) The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dudley, D. (1937) A History of Cynicism. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dudley, D. (1941) ‘Blossius of Cumae’, Journal of Roman Studies 31: 94–9.Google Scholar

Düll, R. (1995) Das Zwölftafelgesetz, 7th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Düring, I. (1968) ‘Aristotle’s use of examples in the Topics ’, in Aristotle on Dialectic, ed. Owen, G.E.L., Cambridge: 202–29.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge Google Scholar

Dyck, A.R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De officiis. Cambridge Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) ‘Stoic philosophy and the concept of the person’, in The Person and the Human Mind, ed. Gill, C.. Cambridge: 109–35.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.) (2017) From Stoicism to Platonism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (1990) The Hellenistic Stoa. Cambridge Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2010) Roman Imperialism. Cambridge Google Scholar

Erskine, A. (2012) ‘Polybius among the Romans: life in the Cyclops’ cave’, in Imperialism, Cultural Politics and Polybius, eds Smith, C. and Yarrow, L.M.. Cambridge: 17–31.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1997) ‘The contexts and occasions of Roman rhetoric’, in Roman Eloquence, ed. Dominik, W.. Cambridge: 111–28.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Faro, S. (2010) ‘La maschera è il volto’, Atti dell’ accademia Romanistica Costantiniana 17: 629–48.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2005) ‘The beginnings of a literature in Latin’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 226–40.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek. Cambridge Google Scholar

Ferguson, W.S. (1911) Hellenistic Athens. Cambridge Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2003) ‘La législation romaine dans les livres 21 à 45 de Tite-Live’, in Laurea internationalis, ed. Hantos, T.. Cambridge: 107–42.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2007) ‘Les philosophes grecs à Rome (155–86 av J.-C.)’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 17–46.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (2014 [1988]) Philhellénisme et impérialisme, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L., Schiavone, A. and Stolfi, A. (2018) Quintus Mucius Scaevola. Opera. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Festa, N. (1932–1935) I frammenti degli Stoici antichi. Cambridge Google Scholar

Fink, J. (1952) ‘Analogie und Anomalie in der Sprache. Zu Varro De lingua Latina 9, 1’, Hermes 80: 377–9.Google Scholar

Finkenauer, T. (2012) ‘[Review of] Barta 2010’, Sehepunkte 12 nr. 12 (online).Google Scholar

Finkenauer, T. (2014) ‘Die römischen Juristen und Gerechtigkeit’, in Recht und Gerechtigkeit, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge.: 11–46.Google Scholar

Finkenauer, T. (2015) ‘Le ‘regulae iuris’ come strumenti mnemotecnici’, Index 43: 15–21.Google Scholar

Fiori, R. (2011) Bonus vir. Politica filosofia retorica e diritto nel De officiis di Cicerone. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fiori, R. (2013) ‘Il vir bonus tra filosofia greca e tradizioni romani nel De officiis di Cicerone’, in Vir bonus, ed. Lovato, A.. Cambridge: 19–39.Google Scholar

Fiori, R. (2014) ‘The vir bonus in Cicero’s De officiis: Greek philosophy and Roman legal science’, in Aequum ius. Cambridge: 187–202.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (2004) Das Zwölftafelgesetz. Cambridge Google Scholar

Flower, H.I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Flower, H.I. (2010) Roman Republics. Cambridge Google Scholar

Flower, H.I. (2014) ‘Spectacle and political culture in the Roman Republic’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. Flower, H., 2nd ed. Cambridge: 377–98.Google Scholar

Fögen, M.T. (2002) Rechtsgeschichten. Cambridge Google Scholar

Forschner, M. (2001) ‘Der Begriff der Person in der Stoa’, in Person, ed. Sturma, D.. Cambridge: 37–57.Google Scholar

Forschner, M. (2018) Die Philosophie der Stoa. Cambridge Google Scholar

Fott, D. (tr.) (2014) Marcus Tullius Cicero. On the Republic and On the Laws. Cambridge Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2016) Discours et verité précédé de La parrêsia, eds Fruchaud, H.-P. and Lorenzini, D.. Cambridge Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless Speech, tr. Pearson, J.. Cambridge Google Scholar

Frank, J. (2005) A Democracy of Distinction. Cambridge Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1974) Die stoische Logik. Cambridge Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1978) ‘Principles of Stoic grammar’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.M.. Cambridge: 27–75, reprinted in Frede (1987), 301–37.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1987) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2011) A Free Will. Cambridge Google Scholar

Friedländer, P. (1909) ‘Persona’, Glotta 2: 164–8.Google Scholar

Frier, B.W. (1985) The Rise of the Roman Jurists. Princeton. Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. and Hose, M. (2017) Das antike Drama. Munich.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch. Cambridge Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1997) Seneca und Kaiser Nero. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garbarino, G. (1973) Roma e la filosofia greca dalle origini alla fine del II secolo A.C. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garbarino, G. (1984) M. Tulli Ciceronis fragmenta ex libris philosophicis, ex aliis libris deperditis, ex scriptis incertis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garbarino, G. (2003) Philosophorum Romanorum fragmenta usque ad L. Annaei Senecae aetatem. Cambridge Google Scholar

Garber, D. (2016) ‘Why the scientific revolution wasn’t a scientific revolution and why it matters’, in Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty, eds Richards, R.J. and Daston, L.. Cambridge: 115–48.Google Scholar

Garcea, A. (2012) Caesar’s De analogia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. (2017) ‘Property and its limits: historical analysis’, in La propriété et ses limites/Der Eigentum und seine Grenzen, eds Winiger, B. and others. Cambridge: 12–38.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. and Whittaker, C. (eds) (1978) Imperialism in the Ancient World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Giglio, F. (2018) ‘The jurist’s mind’ (unpublished inaugural lecture at the University of Surrey, October 2018).Google Scholar

Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis opera volumen tertium: librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1988) ‘Personhood and personality: the four-personae theory in Cicero, De officiis 1’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 169–99.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2009) ‘Ancient concepts of personal identity’, in The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, eds Boys-Stones, G. and others. Cambridge: 260–70.Google Scholar

Giltay, J. (2016) ‘Greek philosophy and classical Roman law’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, eds du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K.. Cambridge: 188–99.Google Scholar

Glare, P.G.W. (2012) Oxford Latin Dictionary, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Glenn, H.P. (2014) Legal Traditions in the World, 5th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1988) ‘Cicero’s philosophical affiliations’, in The Question of “Eclecticism”, eds Dillon, J.M. and Long, A.A.. Cambridge: 34–69.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1992) ‘Critolaus’ scale and Philo’, Classical Quarterly 42: 142–6.Google Scholar

Gomoll, H. (1933) Der stoische Philosoph Hekaton. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H.B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century AD’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.36.2, ed. Haase, W.. Cambridge: 1079–174.Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (1993) ‘Le mouvement cynique et les Romains: attraction et repulsion’, in Le cynisme ancien et ses prolongements, eds Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. and Goulet, R.. Cambridge: 241–58.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2002) Cicero on the Emotions, Cambridge Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Cambridge Google Scholar

Green, P. (tr.) (1974) Juvenal. Sixteen Satires, 2nd ed, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2008) ‘ Iure plectimur. The Roman critique of Roman imperialism’, in East & West, eds Brennan, T.C. and Flower, H.I.. Cambridge: 85–110.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2013a) ‘Latin philosophy and Roman law’, in Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy, eds Harte, V. and Lane, M.. Cambridge: 96–116.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2013b) Seneca on Society. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2017) ‘Dignity in Roman and Stoic thought’, in Dignity, ed. Debes, R.. Cambridge: 47–65.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1997) Philosophia togata 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffith, T. (tr.) (2000) Plato. The Republic, ed. Ferrari, G.R.F. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Griffith, T. (tr.) (2016) Plato. The Laws, ed. Schofield, M.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1975) Le siècle des Scipions. Cambridge Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (1618) Mare liberum [Eng.: The Free Sea]. Leiden.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. Introduction to the Study of the Law of Holland: see Dovring and others (1965) and Lee (1953).Google Scholar

Grotius, H. On the Right of Booty : Hamaker, H.G. (ed.) (1868) Hugonis Grotii De jure praedae commentarius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Guarino, A. (1969) ‘Noterelle Pomponiane’, Labeo 15: 102–7.Google Scholar

Guarino, A. (1981) La coerenza di Publio Mucio. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gudeman, A. (1934) Aristoteles. ΠΕΡΙ ΠΟΙΗΤΙΚΗΣ. Berlin.Google Scholar

Guibal, M.-P. (1937) De l’influence de la philosophie sur le droit romain et la jurisprudence de l’époque classique. Cambridge Google Scholar

Gwynn, A. (1926) Roman Education from Cicero to Quintilian. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Habicht, C. (1990) Cicero the Politician. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (2005) Ancient Rhetoric and Oratory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hadot, I. (1970) ‘Tradition stoïcienne et idées politiques au temps des Gracques’, Revue des études latines 48: 133–79.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (2002) Exercises spirituels et philosophie antique, 4th ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Hager, P. (1998) ‘System’, in Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie 10, eds Ritter, J. and Gründer, K.. Cambridge: cols. 824–5.Google Scholar

Hahm, D.E. (2007) ‘Critolaus and late Hellenistic Peripatetic philosophy’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, eds Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Cambridge: 47–101.Google Scholar

Hard, R. (2012) Diogenes the Cynic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, W.F.R. (1965) ‘The final good in Aristotle’s ethics’, Philosophy 40: 277–95.Google Scholar

Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists. Cambridge Google Scholar

Harries, J. (2007) Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hart, H.L.A (2012 [1961]) The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. (2011) Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. (2013) ‘The texts of Plato and Aristotle in the first century BC’, in Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC, ed. Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 1–27.Google Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. (2016) ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and the construction of the Aristotelian corpus’, in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. Falcon, A.. Cambridge: 81–100.Google Scholar

Haynes, S. (1963) ‘Ludiones etruriae’, in Festschrift Harald Keller. Cambridge: 13–21.Google Scholar

Helmer, É. (ed.) (2016) Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’antiquité. Cambridge Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, J. (1925) Penia en ploutos. Cambridge Google Scholar

Hendrickson, G.L. (1933) ‘The Memoirs of Rutilius Rufus’, Classical Philology 28: 153–75.Google Scholar

Heumann, H.G. and Seckel, G. (1914) Handlexikon zu den Quellen des römischen Rechts, 9th ed. Jena.Google Scholar

Hodge, H.G. (tr.) (1927) Cicero. The Speeches: Pro lege Manilia, Pro Caecina, Pro Cluentio, Pro Rabirio perduellionis. Cambridge Google Scholar

Höffe, O. (2017) ‘De re publica III: Über Ungerechtigkeit und Gerechtigkeit’, in Ciceros Staatsphilosophie, ed. Höffe, O.. Cambridge: 73–89.Google Scholar

Hoetink, H.R. (1955) ‘Les notions anachroniques dans l’historiographie du droit’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 23: 1–20.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T.S. (2005) ‘Die Güter, das Gute und die Frage des rechten Maßes: Platon und das Eigentum’, in Was ist Eigentum?, eds Eckl, A. and Ludwig, B.. Cambridge: 29–42.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T.S. (2009) Wirtschaftsphilosophie. Cambridge Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (1962) Gaius. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (1973) ‘Legal reasoning in Rome and today’, Cambrian Law Review 4: 58–67.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (2002) Ulpian, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Horn, C. (2018) ‘Anknüpfung an die Schultradition’, in Die Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und der Spätantike, eds Riedweg, C., Horn, C. and Wyrwa, D.. Cambridge: 15–18.Google Scholar

Howe, H.M. (1951) ‘Amafinius, Lucretius and Cicero’, American Journal of Philology 72: 57–62.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2005) Appius Claudius Caecus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2014) ‘Numa and Pythagoras: the life and death of a myth’, in The Roman Historical Tradition, eds Richardson, J.H. and Santangelo, F.. Cambridge: 35–52.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2017) ‘La philosophie grecque et les réformes d’Appius Claudius Caecus’, in Philosophari, ed. Vesperini, P.. Cambridge: 13–75.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2018) La République romaine et son empire. Cambridge Google Scholar

Humfress, C. (2015) ‘Telling stories about (Roman) law’, in Legalism: Rules and Categories, eds Dresch, P. and Scheele, J.. Cambridge: 79–104.Google Scholar

Huss, W. (1988) Geschichte der Karthager. Cambridge Google Scholar

Husson, S. (2016) ‘Peut-on être riche et cynique?’, in Richesse et pauvreté chez les philosophes de l’antiquité, ed. Helmer, É.. Cambridge: 125–46.Google Scholar

Ibbetson, D. (2015) ‘Sources of law from the Republic to the Dominate’, in The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, ed. Johnston, D.. Cambridge: 25–44.Google Scholar

Indelli, G. and Tsouna, V. (eds, tr.) (1995) [Philodemus]. [On Choices and avoidances]. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2014) Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Gerson, L.P. (2008) The Stoics Reader. Cambridge Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A.M. (1980) Aristone di Chio e lo Stoicismo antico. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ioro, M. and Reisenzein, R. (eds) (2010) Regel, Norm, Gesetz. Cambridge Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (1966) Techne. Cambridge Google Scholar

Jannot, J.-R. (1993) ‘Phersu, phersuna, persona. À propos du masque étrusque’, in Spectacles sportifs et scèniques dans le monde étrusco-italique. Cambridge: 281–320.Google Scholar

Jörs, P. (1888) Römische Rechtswissenschaft zur Zeit der Republik 1: Bis auf die Catonen. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Johnston, D. (2000) ‘The jurists’ in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds Rowe, C. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 616–34.Google Scholar

Jolowicz, H.F. and Nicholas, B. (1972) Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jones, A.H.M. (1972) The Criminal Courts of the Roman Republic and Principate, 3rd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Jones, G. (ed.) (1973) The Sovereignty of the Law. Selections from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Cambridge Google Scholar

Jonsen, A.R. and Toulmin, S. (1988) The Abuse of Casuistry. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kacprzak, A. (2016) ‘Rhetoric and Roman law’, in The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, eds du Plessis, P., Ando, C. and Tuori, K.. Cambridge: 200–13.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1911 [1785]), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Eng.: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals], Akademie-Ausgabe [Ak.] 4. Berlin: 385–483.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G.E. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kaser, M. (1956) Eigentum und Besitz im älteren Römischen Recht, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kaser, M. (1971) Das römische Privatrecht 1, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kaser, M. (1986 [1978]) ‘Zur Problematik der römischen Rechtsquellenlehre’, in his Römische Rechtsquellen und angewandte Juristenmethode. Cambridge: 8–41.Google Scholar

Kaser, M. and Hackl, K. (1996) Das römische Zivilprozessrecht. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kaser, M., Knütel, R. and Lohsse, S. (2021) Römisches Privatrecht, 22nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kaster, K.A. (tr.) (2020) Cicero. Brutus and Orator. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kasulke, C.T. (2005) Fronto, Marc Aurel und kein Konflikt zwischen Rhetorik und Philosophie im 2. Jh. n. Chr. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kelly, J.M. (1979) ‘Gaius noster: substructures of Western social thought’, American Historical Review 84: 619–48.Google Scholar

Kemp, A. (1987) ‘The Tekhnē Grammatikē of Dionysius Thrax: English translation with introduction and notes’, in The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, ed. Taylor, D.J.. Cambridge: 169–90.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (1963) The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton. Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (1994) A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kerferd, G.B. (1972–1973) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55: 177–96.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio funebris. Cambridge Google Scholar

Klebs, E. (1919) ‘Aelius 155’, RE 1: cols. 535–7.Google Scholar

König, I. (2012) Die römische Republik, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kränzlein, A. (1963) Eigentum und Besitz im griechischen Recht des fünften und vierten Jahrhunderts. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Krauskopf, I. (1985) ‘Phersu’, in Dizionario della civiltà etrusca, ed. Cristofani, M.. Cambridge: 218–19.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1940) ‘Rhetorik’, RE 7A: cols. 1039–1138.Google Scholar

Krüger, P. (1912) Geschichte der Quellen und Litteratur des römischen Rechts, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kunkel, W. (1962) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung des römischen Kriminalrechtsverfahrens in vorsullanischer Zeit. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kunkel, W. (2001) Die römischen Juristen. Cambridge Google Scholar

Kunkel, W. and Wittmann, R. (1995) Die Magistratur. Cambridge Google Scholar

La Greca, F. (2016) Tiberio Gracco e Blossio di Cuma. Cambridge Google Scholar

La Pira, G. (1935a) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana [1]’, in Studi in onore di Filippo Virgilii. Cambridge: 159–82.Google Scholar

La Pira, G. (1934) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 2: L’arte sistematrice’, Bullettino dell istituto di diritto romano N.S. 1: 336–55.Google Scholar

La Pira, G. (1935b) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 3: Il metodo’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 1: 319–48.Google Scholar

La Pira, G. (1936–1937) ‘La genesi del sistema nella giurisprudenza romana 4: Il concetto di scienza e gli strumenti della costruzione scientifica’, Bullettino dell istituto di diritto romano N.S. 3: 131–59.Google Scholar

Lanni, A. (2016) Law and Order in Ancient Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Laurenti, R. (1973) Filodemo e il pensiero economico degli Epicuri. Cambridge Google Scholar

Law, V. (2003) The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lee, R.W. (tr.) (1953) Hugo Grotius. The Jurisprudence of Holland, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Leeman, A.D. (1963) Orationis ratio. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lefebvre, R. (2004) ‘Règle et critère chez Épicure’, Revue des études grecques 117: 82–103.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (2001) Panaitios’ und Ciceros Pflichtenlehre. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lenel, O. (1889) Palingenesia iuris civilis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Leonardis, I. (2019) Varrone. Unus scilicet antiquorum hominum. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lesky, A. (1956) Die tragische Dichtung der Hellenen. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lesky, A. (1971) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, 3rd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962) La pensée sauvage. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lewis, C.T. and Short, C. (1879) A Latin Dictionary. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lewis, J.P. (2013) ‘Did Varro think that slaves were talking tools?’, Mnemosyne 66: 634–48.Google Scholar

Liebersohn, Y.Z. (2010) The Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought, Cambridge Google Scholar

Liebs, D. (1997) ‘Jurisprudenz’, in Die Literatur des Umbruchs von der römischen zur christlichen Literatur, ed. Sallmann, K.. Cambridge: 83–217.Google Scholar

Liebs, D. (2002) ‘Die vorklassischen juristischen Fachschriften’, in Die archaische Literatur, ed. Suerbaum, W.. Cambridge: 560–80.Google Scholar

Lipsius, J. (1905–1913) Das attische Recht und Rechtsverfahren. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Locke, J., Second Treatise on Government: in Laslett, P. (ed.) (1988) John Locke. Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: 265–428.Google Scholar

Long, A.A. (1978) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.M.. Cambridge: 101–24.Google Scholar

Long, A.A. (1991) ‘The harmonics of Stoic virtue’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Supplement, 97–116, reprinted in Long (1996), 202–33.Google Scholar

Long, A.A. (1996) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A.A. (1997) ‘Stoic philosophers on persons, property-ownership and community’, in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R.. Cambridge: 13–31.Google Scholar

Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. and Boas, G. (1935) Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. Cambridge Google Scholar

Lübtow, U. von (1944) ‘Cicero und die Methode der römischen Jurisprudenz’, in Festschrift Wenger. Cambridge: 224–35.Google Scholar

Luschnat, O. (1958) ‘Das Problem des ethischen Fortschritts in der alten Stoa’, Philologus 102: 178–214.Google Scholar

MacDowell, D.M. (1968) The Law in Classical Athens. Cambridge Google Scholar

Macé, A. (ed.) (2012) Choses privées et chose publique en Grèce ancienne. Cambridge Google Scholar

Machek, D. (2016) ‘Using our selves: an interpretation of the Stoic four-personae theory in Cicero’s De officiis I’, Apeiron 49: 163–92.Google Scholar

Macrae, D. (2017) “‘The laws of the rites and of the priests”: Varro and late Republican Roman sacral jurisprudence’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 60: 34–48.Google Scholar

Magdelain, A. (2015) ‘Ius respondendi’ [1950] in his Jus imperium auctoritas, 2nd ed, Cambridge: 103–52.Google Scholar

Malcovati, H. (1976) Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae, 4th ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘ Techne: a new fragment of Chrysippus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine studies 24: 57–65.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius on Stoic philosophy’, Elenchos 7: 295–382.Google Scholar

Mantovani, D. (1999) Le formule del processo privato romano, 2nd ed. Cambridge Google Scholar

Mantovani, D. (2009) ‘Cicerone e il doppio ritratto di Tuberone il vecchio. Sul liber de iure civile in artem redigendo’, Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 75: 113–30.Google Scholar

Mantovani, D. (2018a [2012]) Legum multitudo, tr. Babusieux, U.. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mantovani, D. (2018b) Les juristes écrivains de la Rome antique. Cambridge Google Scholar

Manzoni, G.E. (tr.) (2019) Cicerone. Opere di retorica. Cambridge Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (2011) Roman Republican Theatre. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. (tr.) (2019) Fragmentary Republican Latin: Oratory. Cambridge Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2017) On Writing History, Cambridge Google Scholar

Mariotti, I. (ed.) (1967) Marii Victorini Ars grammatica. Cambridge Google Scholar

Marx, K., Das Kapital 1 (1983 [1867]). Marx-Engels-Gesamtausagabe [MEGA] 2.5. Berlin.Google Scholar

Masi Doria, C. (2011) ‘Principii e regole. Valori e razionalità come forme del discorso giuridico’, in Tra retorica e diritto, ed. Lovato, A.. Cambridge: 19–41.Google Scholar

Maso, S. (2012) Filosofia a Roma. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Matthaios, S. (1999) Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs. Cambridge Google Scholar

Matthaios, S. (2001) ‘Das Wortartensystem der Alexandriner: Skizze seiner Entwicklungsgeschichte und Nachwirkung’, Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 5: 65–94.Google Scholar

May, J.M. and Wisse, J. (tr.) (2001) Cicero. On the Ideal Orator. Cambridge Google Scholar

Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di filosofia neoscolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McElduff, S. (2013) Roman Theories of Translation. Cambridge Google Scholar

McGing, B. (2010) Polybius’ Histories. Cambridge Google Scholar

McGing, B. (2019) ‘Introduction’, in Appian. Roman History 1, tr. McGing, B.. Cambridge: ix–xxxv.Google Scholar

McKnight, E. (2017) ‘Offences against the res publica: the role of public interest arguments in Cicero’s forensic speeches’, The Hague Journal of the Rule of Law 9: 237–63.Google Scholar

Mette, H.J. (1954) Ius civile in artem redactum. Cambridge Google Scholar

Mette, H.J. (1984) ‘Zwei Akademiker heute: Krantor von Soloi und Arkesilaus von Pitane’, Lustrum 26: 7–94.Google Scholar

Mette, H.J. (1985) ‘Weitere Akademiker heute (Fortsetzung von Lustr. 26, 7-94): Von Lakydes bis zu Kleitomachos’, Lustrum 27: 39–148.Google Scholar

Metzger, E. (2015) ‘Roman litigation’, in The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, ed. Johnston, D.. Cambridge: 272–98.Google Scholar

Miglietta, M. (2010) ‘Servius respondit’. Studi intorno a metodo e interpretazione nella scuola giuridica serviana – Prolegomena I. Cambridge Google Scholar

Miller, F.D. (1991) ‘Aristotle on property rights’, in Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 4: Aristotle’s Ethics, eds Anton, J.P. and Preus, A.. Cambridge: 227–61.Google Scholar

Miller, F.D. (1995) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R.E. (1990) Patricians and Plebeians. Cambridge Google Scholar

Miquel, J. (1970) ‘Stoische Logik und römische Jurisprudenz’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 87: 85–122.Google Scholar