Book contents
- Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
- Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 ‘Doing’ Medical Law and Ethics
- 2 A Philosopher Looks at ‘Law and Medical Ethics’
- 3 Thinking Outside the Box
- 4 The Public Interest in Health Research
- 5 Taking the Legacy Forward
- 6 On the Importance of Impact on Policy and Legacy
- 7 Breathing Life into Law
- 8 Biomedical Research Policy
- 9 The Burden of History
- 10 Body Parts and Baleful Stars?
- 11 The Legacy of the Warnock Report
- 12 ‘Only Time Will Tell’
- 13 Integrating the Biological and the Technological
- 14 UK Biobank and the Legal Regulation of Genetic Research
- 15 Overcoming Regulatory Impasse in Stem Cell Research and Advanced Therapy Medicines in Argentina through Shared Norms and Values
- 16 Institutions, Interpretive Communities and Legacy in Decision-Making
- 17 Towards a New Privacy
- 18 A Tale of Two Legacies
- Afterword
- Index
18 - A Tale of Two Legacies
Drawing on Humanist Interpretations to Animate the Right to the Benefits of Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 December 2021
- Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
- Law and Legacy in Medical Jurisprudence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 ‘Doing’ Medical Law and Ethics
- 2 A Philosopher Looks at ‘Law and Medical Ethics’
- 3 Thinking Outside the Box
- 4 The Public Interest in Health Research
- 5 Taking the Legacy Forward
- 6 On the Importance of Impact on Policy and Legacy
- 7 Breathing Life into Law
- 8 Biomedical Research Policy
- 9 The Burden of History
- 10 Body Parts and Baleful Stars?
- 11 The Legacy of the Warnock Report
- 12 ‘Only Time Will Tell’
- 13 Integrating the Biological and the Technological
- 14 UK Biobank and the Legal Regulation of Genetic Research
- 15 Overcoming Regulatory Impasse in Stem Cell Research and Advanced Therapy Medicines in Argentina through Shared Norms and Values
- 16 Institutions, Interpretive Communities and Legacy in Decision-Making
- 17 Towards a New Privacy
- 18 A Tale of Two Legacies
- Afterword
- Index
Summary
This chapter engages with ‘legacy’ in two respects. It argues that Article 15 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), the so-called right to science, has no legacy. It has achieved only marginal real-world impact and remains largely aspirational – all potential. By contrast, Graeme Laurie’s legacy, grounded in the public good and a strong sense of humanism, is significant and informative. Through multiple strands and projects, he has engaged deeply with the social contract between actors in the health setting, developing and refining the tools that could be used to help shape science and science governance in positive ways. Through an exploration of Article 15 ICESCR and select examples of Graeme’s scholarship, this chapter argues that the manifestation of Graeme’s legacy – the calling upon of his legacy – is what we need to generate some positive legacy for the sadly fallow ‘right to science’ articulated in Article 15 ICESCR. If we do this, it might one day have a legacy of its own.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Law and Legacy in Medical JurisprudenceEssays in Honour of Graeme Laurie, pp. 391 - 416Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022