Alexander, C., Chen, M., Seppi, D., and Spatt, C. (2009) The role of advisory services in proxy voting, NBER Discussion Paper No. 15143.Google Scholar

Amzaleg, Y., Ben Zion, U., and Rosenfeld, A. (2007) “On the duty of care of institutional investors: Evidence on participation of mutual fund managers in shareholders meetings in Israel,” Advances in Financial Economics 12, 75–90.Google Scholar

Amzaleg, Y., Ben Zion, U.,, and Rosenfeld, A. (2009) “On the role of institutional investors in corporate governance: Evidence from voting of mutual funds in Israel,” Advances in Financial Economics 13, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashraf, R. and Jayaraman, N. (2007) “Determinants and consequences of proxy voting by mutual funds on shareholder proposals,” unpublished working paper, Georgia Tech.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashraf, R., Jayaraman, N., and Harley, R. (2009) “Conflict of interests and mutual fund proxy voting: evidence from shareholder proposals on executive compensation,” unpublished working paper, Georgia Tech.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bae, K., Kang, J., and Kim, J. (2002) “Tunneling or value added: evidence from mergers by Korean business groups, Journal of Finance 57, 2695–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bebchuk, L. and Hamdani, A. (2009) “The elusive quest for global governance standards,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157, 1263–317.Google Scholar

Black, B. (1992) “Agents watching agents: The promise of institutional investor voice, “UCLA Law Review 39, 811–88.Google Scholar

Black, B. (1998) “Shareholder activism and corporate governance in the United States,” in: Newman, P. (Ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, McMillan Press, New York, pp. 459–66.Google Scholar

Brickley, J., Lease, R., and Smith, C. (1988) “Ownership structure and voting on anti-takeover amendments,” Journal of Financial Economics 20, 267–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brickley, J., Lease, R., and Smith, C. (1994) “Corporate voting: Evidence from charter amendment proposals,” Journal of Corporate Finance 1, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cai, J., Garner, J., and Walkling, R. (2009) “Electing directors,” Journal of Finance 64, 2389–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carleton, W., Nelson, J., and Weisbach, M. (1998) “The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF,” Journal of Finance 53, 1335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Z., Bin, K., and Yang, Z. (2010), “Does granting minority shareholders direct control over corporate decisions help reduce value decreasing corporate decisions in firms with concentrated share ownership? A natural experiment from China,” unpublished working paper, City University of Hong Kong.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremers, M. and Romano, R. (2011) “Institutional investors and proxy voting on compensation plans: the impact of the 2003 mutual fund voting disclosure regulation,” American Law and Economics Review, 13, 220–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, G. and Kim, H. (2007) “Business ties and proxy voting by mutual funds,” Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 552–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jong, A., Mertens, G., and Roosenboom, P. (2006) “Shareholders’ voting at general meetings: Evidence from the Netherlands,” Journal of Management and Governance 10, 353–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Djankov, Simeon, La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F.,. and Shleifer, A. (2008) “The law and economics of self dealing,” Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 430–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enriques, L., Hertig, G., and Kanda, H. (2009) “Related-party transactions,” in: Kraakman, R. et al. (eds.), The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp. 153–82.Google Scholar

Fry, E. (2009) “Too many shareholders not voting, Asian trade body says,” Financial Times, July 12.Google Scholar

Giannetti, M. and Laeven, L.,(2009) “Pension reform, ownership structure, and corporate governance: Evidence from Sweden,” Review of Financial Studies 22, 4091–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillan, S. and Starks, L. (2003) “Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 13, 4–22Google Scholar

Gillan, S. andStarks, L. (2007) “The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 19, 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, R. and Gordon, J. (2003) “Controlling controlling shareholders: New limits on the operate, sale of control, and freeze out alternatives,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152, 785–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goshen, Z. (2003) “The efficiency of controlling corporate self-dealing: Theory meets reality,” California Law Review 91, 393–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guohua, J., Lee, C., and Yue, H. (2010) “Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience,” Journal of Financial Economics 98, 1–20.Google Scholar

Hauser, S., Rosenberg, Y., and Ofir, S. (1999) “An Examination of the benefits due to the compulsory participation of mutual funds in shareholder meetings,” unpublished working paper, Israel Securities Authority (Hebrew).Google Scholar

Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2000) “Tunneling,” American Economic Review 90, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1998) “Law and finance,” Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Listokin, Y. (2010) “If you give shareholders power, do they use it? An empirical analysis,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166, 38–53.Google Scholar

Matvos, G. and Ostrovsky, M. (2008) “Cross-ownership, returns, and voting in mergers”, Journal of Financial Economics 89, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matvos, G. and Ostrovsky, M. (2010) “Heterogeneity and peer effects in mutual fund proxy voting,” Journal of Financial Economics 98, 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maug, E. and Rydkvist, K. (2009) “Do shareholders vote strategically? Voting behavior, proposal screening, and majority rules,” Review of Finance 13, 47–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, A., Poulsen, A., Wolf, J., and Yang, T. (2009) “Mutual funds as monitors: Evidence from mutual fund voting,” unpublished working paper, University of Georgia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norden, L. and Strand, T. (2011) “Shareholder activism among portfolio managers: Rational decisions or 15 minutes of fame?” Journal of Management and Governance, 15, 375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD (2009) Guide on Fighting Abusive Related-Party Transactions in Asia (Corporate Governance Series, OECD, Paris).Google Scholar

Poulsen, T., Strand, T., and Thomsen, S. (2010) “Voting power and shareholder activism: A study of Swedish shareholder meetings,” Corporate Governance: An International Review 18, 329–43.Google Scholar

Rothberg, B. and Lillien, S. (2006) “Mutual funds and proxy voting: New evidence on corporate governance,” Journal of Business and Technology Law 1, 157–84.Google Scholar

Strickland, D., Wilesb, K., and Zenner, M. (1996) “A requiem for the USA: Is small shareholder monitoring effective?” Journal of Financial Economics 40, 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, R. (2010) “UK Seen as Model for Stewardship Guidelines,” Financial Times, August 1.Google Scholar