Nascent Protections in Emerging Giants

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139235730.017

13 - Nascent Protections in Emerging Giants

Struggles to Judicialize Labor Rights in China and Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

William Hurst

Edited by

Randall Peerenboom and

Tom Ginsburg

Show author details

William Hurst: Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Randall Peerenboom: Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Tom Ginsburg: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Roughly 930 million people go to work each day across Indonesia and China. Like many middle-income counterparts, both countries share a history of repression of independent labor organizations and a general lack of respect of labor rights as generally defined in North America or Western Europe. Over the past decade, as China has sought to restore greater equity to its version of “market socialism” and Indonesia has felt its way toward democratization after half a century of military authoritarianism, both have enacted significant measures with an aim of judicializing labor rights and protections. Broadly speaking, Indonesia has created new institutions to facilitate the adjudication of labor rights, while China has laid down new rules to specify labor protections more clearly and forcefully.

Indonesia and China have dramatically different political systems and different levels of per capita gross domestic product (China’s was nearly $1,500 higher than Indonesia’s in 2010, according to the World Bank). They are nevertheless comparable in that they are both large, middle-income countries (MICs) in Asia with developmentalist authoritarian legacies. Tracing the processes by which these two states have moved toward judicialization of labor rights over the past decade thus sheds light on a number of aspects of legal development and change in large MICs.

Type: Chapter
Information: Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries
Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap
, pp. 270 - 287

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235730.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Sweet, Alec Stone, Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin M. and Sweet, Alec Stone, Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRef Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone, “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance,” Comparative Political Studies 32 (1999): 147–84, at 164.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin M., Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRef

Ginsburg, Tom and Chen, Albert, eds., Administrative Law in Asia (Routledge, 2009)

Fu, Hualing, “Access to Justice in China: Potentials, Limits, and Alternatives,” in Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Asian Communist Regimes, ed. Gillespie, John and Chen, Albert (Routledge, 2010), 163–87Google Scholar

Gillespie, John, “Exploring the Limits of the Judicialization of Land Disputes in Vietnam,” Law & Society Review 45 (2011): 241–76CrossRef Google Scholar

Kinkel, Jonathan and Hurst, William, “Access to Justice in Post-Mao China: Assessing the Politics of Criminal and Administrative Law,” Journal of East Asian Studies 11 (2011): 467–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hadiz, Vedi R., Workers and the State in New Order Indonesia (Routledge, 2008)Google Scholar

Hurst, William, “A “China Model” or Just a Broken Mould?,” in Development Models in Muslim Contexts: Chinese, “Islamic” and Neo-Liberal Alternatives, ed. Springborg, Robert (Edinburgh University Press, 2009), 13–25.Google Scholar

Su, Yang and He, Xin, “Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protests in South China,” Law and Society Review 44 (2010): 157–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thireau, Isabelle and Linshan, Hua, “The Moral Universe of Aggrieved Chinese Workers: Workers’ Appeals to Arbitration Committees and Letters and Visits Offices,” The China Journal 50 (2003): 83–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hu, Jieren, “Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application,” Asian Survey 51 (2011): 1065–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Caraway, Teri L., “Protective Repression, International Pressure, and Institutional Design: Explaining Labor Reform in Indonesia,” Studies in Comparative International Development 39 (2004): 28–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bedner, Adriaan, “‘Shopping Forums’: Indonesia’s Administrative Courts,” in New Courts in Asia, ed. Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope (Routledge, 2009), 209–30, at 209.Google Scholar

Sinaga, Marsen, Pengadilan Perburuhan di Indonesia [Labor Courts in Indonesia] (Perhimpunan Solidaritas Buruh, 2006), 74–5.Google Scholar

Tjandra, Surya and Pangaribuan, Marina, Kompilasi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Terseleksi, 2006–2007 [Compilation of Selected Decisions of Courts of Industrial Relations, 2006–2007] (Trade Union Rights Centre, 2007).Google Scholar

Winters, Jeffrey A., “The Political Economy of Labor in Indonesia,” Indonesia 70 (2000): 139–49CrossRef Google Scholar

Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope (Pip), “New Courts in Asia: Law, Development, and Judicialization,” in New Courts in Asia, ed. Harding, Andrew and Nicholson, Penelope (Routledge, 2010), 1–27.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Mary E., “‘Use the Law as your Weapon!’: Institutional Change and Legal Mobilization in China,” in Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice, ed. Diamant, Neil J., Lubman, Stanley B., and O’Brien, Kevin J. (Stanford University Press, 2005), 31–53Google Scholar

Lee, Ching Kwan, Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt (University of California Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Chan, Kay-Wah, “China’s Labour Laws in Transition,” in Law, Wealth and Power in China: Commercial Law Reforms in Context, ed. Garrick, John (Routledge, 2011), 163–81.Google Scholar

Lingling, Hou, “Laodong Hetong Fa Quyu Shishi de Kunjing yu Yingdui” [Difficulties and Remedies in the Regional Implementation of the Labor Contract Law], Fazhi Luntan 2 (2011): 24–33, at 26.Google Scholar

Tan, Yu and Jiang, Ling, “‘Laodong Hetong Fa’ Shishizhong de Wenti, Yunyin ji Duice: Jiyu Henan Sheng X Shi de Shizheng Diaocha” [Problems, Reasons, and Countermeasures in the Implementation of the Labor Contract Law: Empirical Research in Henan Province’s City X], Beijing Laodong Baozhang Zhiye Xueyuan Xuebao 6 (2012): 18–23, at 21.Google Scholar

Cheng, Chen, “Nongmin Gong Gai Zeyang Weihu Ming yu Quan?” [How Should Rural-Urban Migrant Workers Protect Their Reputation and Rights?], Nongcun Kexue Shiyan 8 (2012): 42–3.Google Scholar

Changcheng, Wang, “Laodong Hetong Fa Shishi yilai Woguo Laodong Guanxi Mianling de Wenti yu Duice: Zhendui Hubei Sheng San Shi de Diaocha Yanjiu” [Labor Relations Problems Faced by Our Country and Countermeasures since Implementation of the Labor Contract Law: Investigative Research on Three Cities in Hubei Province], Zhongguo Renli Ziyuan Kaifa 8 (2011): 83–7, at 85–6.Google Scholar

Hurst, William, The Chinese Worker after Socialism (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurst, William and Sorace, Christian, “Recession and the Politics of Class and Production in China,” New Political Science: A Journal of Politics and Culture 33 (2011): 509–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Liyan, Ma, “‘Laodong Hetong Fa’ zai Minying Qiyezhong de Shishi Xiangzhuang yu Duice: yi Xiningshi wei Li” [The Current Situation of Implementation of “The Labor Contract Law” and Countermeasures in Private Enterprises: A Case Study of Xining City], Changsha Daxue Xuebao 26 (2012): 75–7, at 76.Google Scholar

Chunming, Wu, “Ruhe Lijie Laodong Hetong Fa di Shisi Tiaozhong de ‘Lianxu’” [How to Understand “Continuous” in Article 14 of the Labor Contract Law], Zhongguo Laodong 4 (2012): 47–9Google Scholar

Shengfang, Xiao, Jicheng, Liu, and Pengfei, Gao, “‘Laodong Hetong Fa’ zhongwu Guding Qixian Laodong Hetong yu Yongren Danwei Danfang Jiegu Zhidu Xianghu Guanxi Yanjiu” [Research into the Mutual Relationship between the System of Labor Contracts of Indefinite Term and the System of Unilateral Work Unit Dismissals under the Labor Contract Law], Fazhi Luntan 2 (2012): 115–27.Google Scholar

Shu, Ma, “Dengqing Mohu Wenti: Laodong Hetong Fa Geng Caozuoxing, Zhuanjia Bang Nin Jiedu ‘Zhongghu Renmin Gongheguo Laodong Hetong Fa Shishi Tiaoli’” [Clarifying Confusing Issues: The Labor Contract Law’s Greater Practicality, Experts Help You Decipher the Implementation Regulations of the Labor Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China], Heilongjiang Bao, October 6, 2008, 11.

Li Yinglan, , “Lun Jiechu Laodong Guanxi Liyou de Zhengming Zeren: cong ‘Laodong Hetong Fa’ di 38 Tiao Tanqi” [On the Burden of Proof for the Reasons for Severing Labor Relations: Discussing Article 38 of the Labor Contract Law], Zhongbei Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 28 (2012): 27–30, at 29.Google Scholar

Boyong, Wang, “‘Laodong Hetong Fa’ de Jingji Butie Jin Wenti Yanjiu” [Research into Problems of Economic Subsidy Payments under the Labor Contract Law], Fazhi yu Shehui 3 (2012): 104–5.Google Scholar

Mingming, Pan, “Chengshi Nongmin Gong Tao Xin Nan Xianxiang de Tansuo yu Sikao” [Exploration and Thoughts on the Difficult Phenomenon of Rural-Urban Migrant Workers Salary Demands], Wuhan Shangye Fuwu Xueyuan Xuebao 24 (2010): 35–9, at 37Google Scholar

Na, Yu, “Miandui Xin ‘Laodong Hetong Fa’, Qiye Ruhe ‘Ziwo Baohu’?” [Facing a New Labor Contract Law, How Do Enterprises Protect Themselves?], Minying Jingji Bao, March 13, 2008, A8.Google Scholar

Hui, Wu, Duiyu, Su, Rong’gang, Cao, and Xinyu, Huang, “Guanyu Guoyou Qiye Gaizhihou Laodong Zhengyi Anjian de Diaoyan Baogao” [Research Report on Labor Dispute Cases in State-Owned Enterprises after Structural Reform], Fazhi yu Shehui 1 (2012): 253–7.Google Scholar

Hurst, William, Kinkel, Jonathan, and Sowash, Alexandra, “Implementing China’s Labor Law Reforms: Interests and Obligations at the Firm-Level,” in Law and Policy for China’s Market Socialism, ed. Garrick, John (Routledge, 2012), 118–30.Google Scholar

Chen, Fu Yu and Funke, Michael, “China’s New Labor Law: No Harm to Employment?,” China Economic Review 20 (2009): 558–72, at 570.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yining, Chen, ‘“Laodong Hetong Fa’ Zhong Guanyu Laodong Hetong Jiechu Wenti de Qianlun” [Basic Theories on Problems in the Labor Contract Law Regarding the Severing of Contracts], Fazhi yu Shehui 7 (2011): 36–7Google Scholar

Qiaoling, Du, “Laodong Zhongcai Zhidu Ruogan Wenti Tantao” [Probing Various Problems in the Labor Arbitration System], Hezuo Jingji yu Keji 4 (2012): 127–8.Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel S., “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Post-communist Transitions,” World Politics 50 (1998): 203–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Winters, Jeffrey A., Oligarchy (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRef Google Scholar