Law and Development in Middle-Income Countries

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139235730.021

16 - Law and Development in Middle-Income Countries

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014

Randall Peerenboom

Edited by

Randall Peerenboom and

Tom Ginsburg

Show author details

Randall Peerenboom: Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Randall Peerenboom: Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Tom Ginsburg: Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter summarizes the key findings of this volume; locates these findings within the existing literatures on law and development and related fields; highlights areas for further research; and develops policy recommendations for middle-income country (MIC) governments and development agencies. The discussion is organized around the eight issue areas set forth in the introduction: (1) Is “middle-income country” an analytically useful category? (2) Is there a middle-income trap, are there various traps, or is it a myth? (3) What if anything do successful MICs share? (4) Why have East Asian states been so successful, and does the recent success of Central and Eastern European (CEE) states provide an alternative model? (5) What is the relationship between politics, or political-economy, and development in MICs? (6) How have MICs been influenced by and adapted to the new international economic order? (7) What approaches are available to MICs to address pressing socioeconomic issues? And finally, (8) what lessons are there for policy makers and development agencies in promoting rule of law and good governance in MICs? We conclude with some recommendations for future research.

IS “MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRY” AN ANALYTICALLY USEFUL CATEGORY?

There are both quantitative and qualitative arguments in favor of MICs as a useful analytical category or concept. There is a well-established correlation between wealth, good governance, rule of law, the protection of human rights, and other indicators of human well-being. Nevertheless, sorting countries by levels of wealth provides additional insights because the relationship is not uniform at all levels of the income scale. Table 16.1 provides correlations between per capita income, the Governance Indicators of the World Bank, along with the Human Development Index and selected other indicators. Consistent with other work, we see strong overall correlations when all countries are included in the analysis (column 1). When one breaks down the correlations by income class, however, one sees differential links at different levels of income. The correlation coefficients are highest at the middle-income level, and the relationships are more significant. Dividing the MIC category into upper middle-income countries (UMICs) and lower middle-income countries (LMICs) provides further dividends. Again the correlation coefficients are higher at the lower level of wealth, that is, for LMICs than for UMICs, with equal or greater levels of significance.

Type: Chapter
Information: Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries
Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap
, pp. 335 - 366

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235730.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Peerenboom, Randall, China Modernizes: Threat to the West or Model for the Rest? (Oxford University Press, 2007), 40–1Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas, “How Democracies Emerge: The ‘Sequencing’ Fallacy,” Journal of Democracy (January 2007): 12–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Peerenboom, Randall, “The East Asian Model and the Sequencing Debate: Lessons from China and Vietnam,” in Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam, ed. Gillespie, John and Chen, Albert (Taylor and Francis, 2010), 29–50Google Scholar

Hand, Keith, “Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China,” University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review 7, no. 1 (2011): 51–159Google Scholar

Thayer, Carlyle A., “Vietnam and the Challenge of Political Civil Society,” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 31, no. 1 (April 2009): 1–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Tria Kerkvliet, Benedict J., Government Repression and Toleration in Contemporary VietnamSoutheast Asia Research Centre, Working Paper Series No. 119, 2012, 5–8Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, One Economics, Many Recipes (Princeton University Press, 2007), 6Google Scholar

Ganev, Venelin, “The Rule of Law as an Institutionalized Wager: Constitutions, Courts and Transformative Social Dynamics in Eastern Europe,” Hague Journal on Rule of Law 1, no. 2 (2009): 263–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph, The Price of Inequality (W. W. Norton and Company, 2012)Google Scholar

Taylor, Veronica, “Globalization and Japanese Regulation,” in Regulation in Asia: Pushing Back on Globalization, ed. Gillespie, John and Peerenboom, Randall (Routledge, 2009), 226–56Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, One Economics, Many Recipes (Princeton University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Rigobon, Roberto and Rodrik, Dani, “Rule of Law, Democracy, Openness, and Income: Estimating the Interrelationships,” Economics of Transition 13 (2005): 533CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, David, et al., “Democratic Transitions,” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2006): 551–69CrossRef Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRef Google Scholar

Deva, Surya, “Public Interest Litigation in India: A Critical Review,” Civil Justice Quarterly 28 (2009): 19–40Google Scholar

Ramachandran, Raju, “The Supreme Court and the Basic Structure Doctrine,” in Supreme but Not Infallible, ed. Kirpal, B. N., et al. (Oxford University Press, 2000), 107Google Scholar

Peerenboom, Randall, “More Law, Less Courts: Legalized Governance, Judicialization and Dejudicialization in China,” in Administrative Law and Governance in Asia, ed. Ginsburg, Tom and Chen, Albert (RoutledgeCurzon, 2008), 175–202Google Scholar

Peerenboom, Randall, “Economic and Social Rights: The Role of Courts in China,” San Diego International Law Review 12 (2011): 303–25Google Scholar

Reid, Michael, Forgotten Continent: The Battle for Latin America’s Soul (Yale University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis, ed., Falling Behind: Explaining the Development Gap between Latin America and the United States (Oxford University Press, 2008)

Schimmelfennig, Fank, “A Comparison of the Rule of Law Promotion Policies of Major Western Powers,” in The Dynamics of Rule of Law in an Era of International and Transnational Governance, ed. Zurn, Michael, Noelkamper, Andre, and Peerenboom, Randall (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006)

Santos, Alvaro, “The World Bank’s Uses of the ‘Rule of Law’ Promise in Economic Development,” in The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, ed. Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro (Cambridge University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Taylor, Veronica, “Frequently Asked Questions about Rule of Law Assistance (And Why Better Answers Matter),” Hague Journal on Rule of Law 1, no. 1 (2009): 46–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, “Second-Best Institutions,” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 98, no. 2 (2008): 100–4CrossRef Google Scholar

Hammergren, Linn, “Rule of Law Challenges in Middle-Income Countries and Donor Approaches to Them,” in The Dynamics of Rule of Law in an Era of International and Transnational Governance, ed. Zurn, Michael, Noelkamper, Andre, and Peerenboom, Randall (Cambridge University Press 2012), 199–200Google Scholar

Ingleheart, Ronald, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar