Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T13:20:39.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Growing Wealth in East Asian Middle-Income Countries with Transnational Production Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
John Gillespie
Edited by
Randall Peerenboom  and
Tom Ginsburg
John Gillespie
Affiliation:
Monash University
Randall Peerenboom
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Tom Ginsburg
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Since the 1960s, law and development theorists have prescribed law-based measures for stimulating economic development in East Asian middle-income countries (MICs). During the last decade, a growing number of scholars from different disciplines claim that rapid economic growth in this region is taking place without fully functioning legal systems. They argue that consistent and pragmatic state developmental policies, more than formal laws and legal institutions, are the main ingredients for economic growth. This chapter provides a complementary explanation for economic growth in East Asia. It posits that transnational production regimes (TPRs) are responsible for generating much wealth creation in East Asian MICs over the last thirty years. TPRs are structured around supply chain and investment networks that transfer goods, capital, and knowledge among firms in high-income countries (HICs) and MICs.

This chapter musters evidence that, over the last three decades, intra-Asian TPRs have incrementally displaced Euro-American TPRs as the main source of technical and regulatory knowledge in East Asian MICs. This transformation has three principle implications: first, knowledge transferred through TPRs largely bypasses domestic laws and legal institutions and directly influences East Asian firms; second, intra-Asian TPRs are more likely than Euro-American TPRs to convey the regulatory knowledge needed to innovate and upgrade into higher value-added activities in world markets; and third intra-Asian TPRs are a key factor in generating wealth creation and raising the next wave of East Asian countries into the ranks of HICs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Law and Development of Middle-Income Countries
Avoiding the Middle-Income Trap
 , pp. 108 - 128
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Trebilcock, Michael and Daniels, Ronald, Rule of Law Reform and Development: Charting the Fragile Path of Progress (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald, “Economic Development and the Rights Hypothesis: The China Problem,” American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003): 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, Frank, “From Demsetz to Deng: Speculations on the Source,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 41, no. 3 (2009): 522–602.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald and Milhaupt, Curtis, “Economically Benevolent Dictators: Lessons for Developing Democracies,” American Journal of Comparative Law 59 (2011): 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provan, Keith and Kenis, Patrick, “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18, no. 2 (2008): 229–52, at 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Timothy J. and Lester, Richard K., The New Global Supply Base – New Challenges for Local Suppliers in East Asia (Industrial Performance Centre, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003)Google Scholar
Kimura, Fukunari, “International Production/Distribution Networks in Indonesia,” The Developing Economies 43 (2005): 17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javorcik, Beata, “Can Survey Evidence Shed Light on Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment?,” World Bank Research Observer 23, no. 2 (2008): 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterby-Smith, Mark and Lyles, Marjorie A., ed., Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (Wiley, 2011)
Sproull, L. and Cohen, M., Organizational Learning (Sage, 1996).Google Scholar
Mell, Luiz De, “Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries and Growth: A Selective Survey,” Journal of Development Studies 34, no. 1 (1997): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokko, Ari and Kravtsov, Victoria, “Innovative Capability in MNC Subsidiaries: Evidence from Four European Transition Economies,” Post-Communist Economies 20, no. 1 (2008): 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael, and Leng, Jing, “The Role of Formal Contract Law and Enforcement in Economic Development,” Virginia Law Review 92 (2006): 1517–80.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Upham, Frank, “Privatized Regulation: Japanese Regulatory Style in Comparative and International Perspective,” Fordham International Law Journal 20 (1997): 396.Google Scholar
Hartman, F. L., “Japanese Foreign Investment Regulation: Semantics and Reality,” New York Law Forum 18 (1972–3): 355Google Scholar
Ohnesorge, John, “Law and Development Orthodoxies and the Northeast Asian Experience,” in Law and Development in Asia, ed. McAlinn, Gerald and Pejovic, Caslav (Routledge, 2012), 7, 16–30.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industry Policy (Stanford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Lincoln, James R., Gerlach, Michael L., and Ahmadjian, Christina L., “Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan,” American Sociological Review 61, no. 1 (February 1996): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James R. and Gerlach, Michael L., Japan’s Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 147–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Committee on Japan, Maximizing U.S. Interests in Science and Technology Relations with Japan, U.S. Office of International Affairs (1997)Google Scholar
Nee, Victor and Swedberg, Richard, ed., The Economic Sociology of Capitalism (Princeton University Press, 2005)
Chung, Chi-Nien, “Beyond Guanxi: Network Contingencies in Taiwanese Business Groups,” Organisational Studies 27, no. 4 (2005): 461–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko, Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko, Jackson, Gregory, and Miyajima, Hideaki, ed., Corporate Governance in Japan (Oxford University Press, 2007), 370–98.CrossRef
Arndt, Sven W. and Kierzkowski, Henryk, Fragmentation: New Production Patterns in World Economy (Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles, “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy,” European Law Journal 3, no. 4 (1997): 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Timothy J. and Lester, Richard K., The New Global Supply Base-New Challenges for Local Suppliers in East Asia, IPC Working Paper Series (October 2003)
Nottage, John Luke, Perspectives and Approaches Corporate Governance in the 21st Century: Japanese Gradual Transformation (Edward Elgar, 2008), 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, Bruce, “Learning from Toyota’s Troubles: The Debate on Board Oversight, Board Structure, and Director Independence in Japan,” Journal of Japanese Law 15, no. 30 (2010): 67–87.Google Scholar
Fung, Kwong-Chiu, Iizaka, Hitomi, and Siu, Alan, “United States, Japanese, and Korean FDI and Intra-East Asian Trade,” Asian Economic Papers 9, no. 3 (2010): 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. and Reich, Simon, “National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behaviour,” International Organization 51, no. 1 (1997): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wan, Minh, Sino-Japanese Relations: Interaction, Logic and Transformation (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2006), 57–63.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob and Sum, Ngai-Ling, Beyond the Regulatory Approach (Edward Elgar, 2006), 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, Neil M., et al., “Globalizing Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29, no. 4 (2004): 468–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, Henry Wai-chung, “Regional Development and the Competitive Dynamics of Global Production Networks: An East Asian Perspective,” Regional Studies 43, no. 3 (2009): 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayakawa, Kazunobu, Zheng JI, J., and Obashi, Ayako, “Spatial Distribution of Industrial Production: A Comparison of East Asia and Europe,” The Developing Economies 49, no. 4 (December 2011): 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, M. and Zhou, J., “How Network Strategies and Institutional Transitions Evolve,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management 22 (2005): 321–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruenwald, Paul and Hori, Masahiro, “Intra-regional Trade Key to Asia’s Export Boom,” IMF Survey Magazine (2008)
Rai, Durgesh K., “Asian Economic Integration and Cooperation – Challenges and Way Forward,” East Asia Forum (2010)
Haiyan, Tang and Huiqing, Zhang, “China Reshapes the East Asian Production Network,” China Economist 4. no. 2 (2009)Google Scholar
Fung, Kwong-Chiu, Iizaka, Hitomi, and Siu, Alan, “United States, Japanese, and Korean FDI and Intra-East Asian Trade,” Asian Economic Papers 9, no. 3 (2010): 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James R. and Gerlach, Michael L., Japan’s Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (Cambridge University Press, 2004), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James R. and Gerlach, Michael L., Japan’s Network Economy: Structure, Persistence, and Change (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A., The Road to Serfdom (Routledge, 2005), 33–44.Google Scholar
List, Christian and Pettit, Philip, Group Agent: The Possibility of Design and the Status of Corporate Agents (Oxford University Press, 2011), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J., “How Chrysler Created an American Keiretsu,” Harvard Business Review 74, no. 4 (July–August, 1996): 42–52Google Scholar
Collins, Hugh, “The Network Architecture of Supply Chains,” in Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-Operation, ed. Amstutz, M. and Teubner, G. (Hart Publishing, 2009), 187–210.Google Scholar
Abo, Tetsuo, “Hybridization of Japanese Production Systems in North America, Newly Industrialized Economies, South East Asia and Europe: Contrasting Configurations,” in Between Imitation and Innovation, ed. Boyer, Robert, Charron, Elsie, Jurgens, Ulrich, and Tolliday, Steven (Oxford University Press, 1997), 216–30Google Scholar
Abo, Tetsuo, “The Japanese Production System: The Process of Adaption to Natural Settings,” in States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization, ed. Boger, R. and Drache, D. (Routledge, 1996), 136–54.Google Scholar
Yueng, Henry, Transnational Corporations and Business Networks (Routledge, 1998), 6Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Richard, Felstiner, William, and Gessner, Volkmar, Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions (Hart Publishing, 2001), 159–88.Google Scholar
Cashmore, Benjamin, “Legitimacy and Privatization of Environmental Governance: How Non-state Market Driven Systems Gain Market Recognition,” Governance 15, no. 502 (2002): 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, Yuqing and Detert, Neal, How the iPhone Widens the United States Trade Deficit with the People’s Republic of China, Asian Development Bank Institute, Working Paper Series, No. 257 (December 2010)
Chen, Chung-Jen, “The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance, Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance,” R&D Management 34, no. 3 (2004): 311–21Google Scholar
Yusuf, Shahid, “Intermediating Knowledge Exchange between Universities and Businesses,” Research Policy 37, no. 8 (2008): 1167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selnes, F. and Sallis, J., “Promoting Relationship Learning,” Journal of Marketing 67 (2003): 80–95, at 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, M. S., Myers, M. B., and Mentzer, J. T., “The Value of Relational Learning in Global Buyer-Supplier Exchanges,” Strategic Management Journal 32, no. 10 (2011): 1061, 1064–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. and Ghoshal, S., Managing Across Borders: A Transnational Solution (Harvard Business School Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Griffith, D. and Myers, M., “The Performance Implications of Strategic Fit of Relational Norm Governance Strategies in Global Supply Chain Relationships,” Journal of International Business Studies 36 (2005): 254–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Yusheng, “Kinship Networks and Entrepreneurs in China’s Transitional Economy,” American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 5 (2004): 1045–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selnes, F. and Sallis, J., “Promoting Relationship Learning,” Journal of Marketing 67 (2003): 80–95, at 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zellmer-Bruhn, M. and Gibson, C., “Multinational Organization Context: Implications for Team Learning and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 3 (2006): 501–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorentzen, Jochen, Mollgaard, Peter, and Rojec, Matija, “Host-country Absorption of Technology: Evidence from Automotive Supply Networks in Eastern Europe,” Industry and Innovation 10, no. 4 (2003): 415–32, at 418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, Banji and Lal, Kaushalesh, “Learning New Technologies by Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries,” Technovation 26 (2006): 220–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yueng, Henry, Transnational Corporations and Business Networks (Routledge, 1998), 5–6Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. and Govindarajan, V., “Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal 21, no. 4 (2000): 473–96.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, , et al., “The Value of Relational Learning in Global Buyer-Supplier Exchanges,” 1066; Clive Lawson and Edward Lorenz, “Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity,” Regional Studies 33, no. 4 (1999): 305–17, at 309.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko, Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy (Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, Ronald, “Inside Management and Board Reform: For Whose Benefits?,” in Corporate Governance in Japan Institutional Change and Organizational Diversity, ed. Aoki, Masahiko, Jackson, Gregory, and Miyajima, Hideaki (Oxford University Press, 2007), 370–98.Google Scholar
Author unknown, “Intel talks about investment environment in Vietnam” [Intel nói về môi trường đầu tư Việt Nam], Vietnam Economic Times, January 24, 2008.
VnExpress, “A state agency signs a commitment refusing bribes” [Một cơ quan nhà nước ký cam kết từ chối việc hối lộ], Vietnamnet Bridge, September 7, 2007
McMillan, John and Woodruff, Christopher, “Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 4 (1999): 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John, “Testing the Limits to the ‘Rule of Law’: Commercial Regulation in Vietnam,” Journal of Comparative Asian Development 12, no. 2 (2008): 245–72.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History 1400–1900 (Cambridge University Press, 2002), 3–9.Google Scholar
Molinsky, Andrew, “Cross-Cultural Code-Switching: The Psychological Challenges of Adapting Behavior in Foreign Cultural Interactions,” Academy of Management Review 32, no. 2 (2007): 622–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yagi, Noriko and Kleinberg, Jill, “Boundary Work: An Interpretive Ethnographic Perspective on Negotiating and Leveraging Cross-Cultural Identity,” Journal of International Business Studies 42 (2011): 629–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deyo, Frederic C. and Doner, Richard F., “Dynamic Flexibility and Sectoral Governance in the Thai Auto Industry: The Enclave Problem,” in Economic Governance and the Challenge of Flexibility in East Asia, ed. Deyo, Frederic C., Doner, Richard F., and Hershberg, Eric (Rowman and Littlefield, 2001), 107–36.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles, Work and Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1983), 33.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John, “Exploring the Role of Legitimacy and Identity in Framing Responses to Global Legal Reforms in Socialist Transforming Asia,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 29, no. 2 (2011): 101–46.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×