Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:04:29.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2022

Brad Inwood
Brad Inwood
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Later Stoicism 155 BC to AD 200
An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation
 , pp. 557 - 563
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesse, F. (1997) Panezio di Rodi: Testimonianze. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (1995) Concepts of Space. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Algra, K. et al. (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alpers-Gölz, R. (1976) Der Begriff ΣΚΟΠΟΣ in der Stoa und seine Vorgeschichte. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1993) The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzano, A. (1985) “Cheremone di Alessandria,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II/32.3. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, pp. 1981–2001.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Long, A. A. eds. (1992) “Hierocles: Elementa Moralia” (PBerol. inv. 9780), in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini I.1.2. Firenze: Olschki.Google Scholar
Bazou, A. (2011) Γαληνοῦ Ὅτι ταῖς τοῦ σώματος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις ἕπονται. Athens: ᾿Ακαδημία ᾿Αθηνῶν.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. eds. (2019) Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, A. (1996) The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus: An English Translation, trans. W. O. Stephens. New York: Peter Lang. A translation of Die Ethik des Stoikers Epiktet (Stuttgart: Enke, 1894).Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., Jouanna, J. and Pietrobelli, A. (2010) Galien Tome IV. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Todd, R. B. (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. (1969) Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2007) “Physiognomy and Ancient Psychological Theory,” pp. 19–124 in Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul, ed. Swain, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2018a) L. Annaeus Cornutus: Greek Theology, Fragments and Testimonia. Atlanta: Society for Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2018b) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bréhier, E. (1914) “Posidonius d’Apamée théoricien de la géometrie,” Revue des Études Grecques 27, 44–58.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2000) “Reservation in Stoic Ethics,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 82, 149–177.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) “The Stoic Theory of the Supreme Genus and Platonic Ontology,” pp. 92–157 in Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Brunschwig., J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2005) “Sur deux notions de l’éthique stoïcienne: De la ‘réserve’ au ‘renversement,’” pp. 357–380 in Les Stoïciens, ed. Gourinat, J.-B.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1976) “Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy,” Philosophical Review 85, 44–69.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1997) “Antipater and Self-refutation,” pp. 277–310 in Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, ed. Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1998) “Posidonius on Emotions,” pp. 71–111 in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, T. and Sihvola, J.. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; repr. as ch. 21 of J. Cooper, Reason and Emotion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. (2004) “Moral Theory and Moral Improvement: Seneca,” pp. 309–334 in Knowledge, Nature and the Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. and Procopé, J. (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curtze, M. (1899) Anaritii in decem libros priores Elementorum Euclidis Commentarii. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. ed. and trans. (2005) Galeni De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, 3rd edn. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. (3 vols. originally published 1978–1984. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V 4,1,2.)Google Scholar
Deming, W. (2004) Paul on Marriage and Celibacy. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2013) Diogenes Laërtius: Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2019) Seneca: Selected Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, J. and Berggren, J. L. (2006) Geminos’ Introduction to the Phainomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1980) “The Original Notion of Cause,” pp. 217–249 in Doubt and Dogmatism ed. Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. F. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1989) “Chairemon der Stoiker,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, II/ 36.3, pp. 2067–2103.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1997) “Euphrates of Tyre,” pp. 1–11 in Aristotle and After, ed. Sorabji, R.. London: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supp. 68.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) “Epilogue,” pp. 771–797 in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, Keimpe, Barnes, Jonathan, Mansfeld, Jaap and Schofield, Malcolm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1983) Socraticorum Reliquiae, vol. I. Naples: Ateneo/Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Giavatto, A. (2008) Interlocutore di se stesso: la dialettica di Marco Aurelio. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Giavatto, A. (2012) “Logic and the Meditations,” pp. 408–419 in A Companion to Marcus Aurelius, ed. Marcel, van Ackeren. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2012) “Marcus and Previous Stoic Literature,” pp. 382–395 in A Companion to Marcus Aurelius, ed. Marcel, van Ackeren. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2013) Marcus Aurelius: Meditations 1–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glibert-Thirry, A. (1977) Pseudo-Andronicus ΠΕΡΙ ΠΑΘΩΝ. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gomoll, H. (1933) Der stoische Philosoph Hekaton. Leipzig: Hoppe.Google Scholar
Goulet, R. ed. (1989–2018) (DPhA) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. 9 vols. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2012) “Ethics,” pp. 420–436 in A Companion to Marcus Aurelius, ed. Marcel, van Ackeren. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graver, M. (1999) “Philo of Alexandria and the Origin of the Stoic propatheiai,” Phronesis 44, 300–325.Google Scholar
Griffin, Michael (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Michael (1992) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Groisard, J. (2013) Alexandre d’Aphrodise sur la mixtion et la croissance. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1978) “Un clé des Pensées de Marc-Aurèle: les trois topoi philosophiques selon Épictète,” Les Études Philosophiques 33, 65–83.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1998) The Inner Citadel (trans. Michael Chase). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (2007) “Critolaus and Late Hellenistic Peripatetic Philosophy,” pp. 47–101 in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers, ed. Ioppolo, Anna Maria and Sedley, David. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Harriman, B. (2020) “Musonius Rufus, Cleanthes, and the Stoic Community at Rome,” Elenchos 41, 71–104.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2013) Greece and Mesopotamia: Dialogues in Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hense, O. (1905) C. Musonius Rufus: Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hine, H. (1981) An Edition with Commentary of Seneca Natural Questions, Book Two. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1991) “Chrysippus on Extension and the Void,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 178, 245–266.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2005) Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007) Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014a) “Walking and Talking: Reflections on Divisions of the Soul in Stoicism,” pp. 63–83 in Partitioning the Soul: The Debates from Plato to Leibniz, ed. Corcilius, K. and Perler, D.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014b) “Ancient Goods: The Tria Genera Bonorum in Ancient Ethics,” pp. 255–280 in Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic in Honor of Gisela Striker, ed. Lee, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2014c) Ethics after Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2017) “The Legacy of Musonius Rufus,” pp. 254–276 in From Stoicism to Platonism, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ju, A. E. (2009a) “The Stoic Ontology of Geometrical Limits,” Phronesis 54, 371–389.Google Scholar
Ju, A. E. (2009b) “Stoic and Posidonian Thought on the Immortality of the Soul,” Classical Quarterly 59, 112–124.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. (1998) “Aidōs in Epictetus,” Classical Philology 93, 136–160.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (1983) “Euemptosia-Proneness to Disease,” pp. 107–113 in On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics:The Work of Arius Didymus. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (2006) “Posidonius and Logic,” pp. 29–40 in Les stoïciens et leur logique ed. Brunschwig, J., 2nd edn. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. and Edelstein, L. (1989) Posidonius: The Fragments, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Two vols. of commentary published in 1988. Cited as E-K.Google Scholar
King, C. (2011) Musonius Rufus: Lectures and Sayings. [United States]: Createspace.Google Scholar
Laurand, V. (2014) Stoïcisme et lien social. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2014) “Pouvoir et cultures: ombres et lumières,” pp. 222–229 in Alexandrie la Divine, ed. Méla, C. and Möri, F.. Geneva: Éditions de la Baconnière.Google Scholar
Lolos, A. (1981) Der unbekannte Teil der Ilias-Exegesis des Iohannes Tzetzes (A97-609) editio princeps. Königstein/Ts.: Hain.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1985) “The Stoics on World-Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence,” pp. 13–37 in Recovering the Stoics (Spindel Conference 1984), Vol. 23 Supp. of The Southern Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) “Stoic Readings of Homer,” pp. 58–84 in Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited as LS.Google Scholar
Lutz, C. (1947) “Musonius Rufus ‘The Roman Socrates,’” Yale Classical Studies 10, 3–147.Google Scholar
Maass, E. (1892) Aratea. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Maass, E. (1898) Commentariorum in Aratum Reliquiae. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. (2020) Aëtiana V. 5 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (1967) Heraclitus. Merida, Venezuela: Los Andes University Press.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (1999) “The Stoic Theory of Categories,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17, 215–247.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) ‘The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist, Stoic and Roman,” pp. 283–326 in The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2020) “The Platonic Soul, from the Early Academy to the First Century CE,” pp. 171–198 in Body and Soul, ed. Inwood, B. and Warren, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, N. (2014) “Void and Space in Stoic Ontology,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramelli, I. (2018) “Annaeus Cornutus and the Stoic Allegorical Tradition: Meaning, Sources, and Impact,” Aitia 8.2 (online 31 December 2018, consulted 4 March 2021). http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/2882; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/aitia.2882.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. and Konstan, D. (2009) Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments and Excerpts. Atlanta: Society for Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005a) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005b) “Le sage face à Zeus,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4, 579–596.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1971) “Ennoia and Prolēpsis,” pp. 22–37 in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Schmekel, A. (1892) Die Philosophie der mittleren Stoa in ihrem geschichtlichen Zusammenhange dargestellt. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Schmitz, P. (2014) Cato Peripateticus: stoische und peripatetische Ethik im Dialog. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1991) The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (1988) “Innatism and the Stoa,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 34, 123–153.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1993) “Chrysippus on Psychophysical Causality,” pp. 313–331 in Passions & Perception, ed. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2002) “The Origins of Stoic God,” pp. 41–83 in Traditions of Theology, ed. Frede, D. and Laks, A.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003) “The School from Zeno to Arius Didymus,” pp. 7–32 in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2005) “Stoic Metaphysics at Rome,” pp. 117–142 in Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, ed. Salles, R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2012) “Marcus Aurelius on Physics,” pp. 396–407 in A Companion to Marcus Aurelius, ed. Marcel, van Ackeren. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1982) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Fate. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (1994) Alexander of Aphrodisias Quaestiones 2.16–3.15. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2013) Galen: Psychological Writings, ed. Singer, P. N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and their Sequel. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1986) “Antipater, or the Art of Living,” pp. 185–204 in The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2007) “Panaetius’ Place in the History of Stoicism,” pp. 103–142 in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, ed. Ioppolo, Anna Maria and Sedley, David. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (2014) “Posidonius on the Void: A Controversial Case of Divergence Revisited,” pp. 69–81 in Space in Hellenistic Philosophy: Critical Studies in Ancient Physics, ed. Helmig, C., Horn, C. and Ranocchia, G.. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Van Ackeren, M. (2011) Die Philosophie Marc Aurels. 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Horst, P. W. (1987) Chaeremon: Egyptian Priest and Stoic Philosopher. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
van Geytenbeek, A. C. (1963) Musonius and Greek Diatribe (revised edn., trans. Hijmans, B. L.). Assen: van Gorcum.Google Scholar
van Straaten, M. (1962) Panaetii Rhodii Fragmenta, 3rd edn. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. (2004) Il mediostoicismo di Panezio. Milan: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Vitelli, G. (1902) “Due frammenti di Alessandro di Afrodisia,” pp. 90–93 in Festschrift Theodor Gomperz. Vienna.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2009) Manilius and His Intellectual Background. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Von Arnim, H. (1903–1905) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. 3 vols. Stuttgart: Teubner. Cited as SVF.Google Scholar
White, S. (2007) “Posidonius and Stoic Physics,” pp. 35–76 in Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC – 200 AD, vol. I, ed. Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W.. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (1996) “Self-Love and Authoritative Virtue,” pp. 162–199 in Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics, ed. Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (2014) “Fool’s Pleasures in Plato’s Philebus,” pp. 21–59 in Strategies of Argument, ed. Lee, Mi-Kyoung. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001) Greek Literature and the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2005) The Second Sophistic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wildberger, J. (2006) Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. 2 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (2012) The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Brad Inwood, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Later Stoicism 155 BC to AD 200
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139342599.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Brad Inwood, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Later Stoicism 155 BC to AD 200
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139342599.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Brad Inwood, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: Later Stoicism 155 BC to AD 200
  • Online publication: 30 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139342599.009
Available formats
×