Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Notation
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Preliminaries
- 3 Static Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 4 Static Systems: Probabilistic Structural Uncertainty
- 5 Discrete-Time Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 6 Continuous-Time Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 7 Static Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- 8 Discrete-Time Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- 9 Continuous-Time Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- Appendix A Mathematical Background
- Appendix B Power Flow Modeling
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 January 2022
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Notation
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Preliminaries
- 3 Static Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 4 Static Systems: Probabilistic Structural Uncertainty
- 5 Discrete-Time Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 6 Continuous-Time Systems: Probabilistic Input Uncertainty
- 7 Static Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- 8 Discrete-Time Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- 9 Continuous-Time Systems: Set-Theoretic Input Uncertainty
- Appendix A Mathematical Background
- Appendix B Power Flow Modeling
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Large-Scale System Analysis Under UncertaintyWith Electric Power Applications, pp. 330 - 333Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Desoer, C. A. and Zadeh, L. A., Linear System Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1963.Google Scholar
Athans, M. and Falb, P., Optimal Control: An Introduction to the Theory and Its Application. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
Kalman, R. E., “Analysis and design principles of second and higher order saturating servomechanisms,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Part II: Applications and Industry, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 294–310, 1955.Google Scholar
Kalman, R. E., “Canonical structure of linear dynamical systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 596–600, April 1962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luenberger, D., Introduction to Dynamic Systems: Theory, Models, and Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.Google Scholar
Ogata, K., Modern Control Engineering, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001.Google Scholar
Khalil, H. K., Nonlinear Systems, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.Google Scholar
Hespanha, J. P., Linear Systems Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Franklin, G. F., Powell, D. J., and Emami-Naeini, A., Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2019.Google Scholar
Grimmett, G. and Stirzaker, D., Probability and Random Processes, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bertsekas, D. P. and Tsitsiklis, J. N., Introduction to Probability, 2nd ed. Nashua, NH: Athena Scientific, 2008.Google Scholar
Hajek, B., Probability with Engineering Applications: ECE 313 Course Notes. [Online] https://courses.grainger.illinois.edu/ece313/fa2016/ probabilityJan17.pdf,2017.Google Scholar
Hajek, B., Random Processes for Engineers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjicostis, C., Estimation and Inference in Discrete Event Systems. London: Springer Nature, 2020.Google Scholar
Chernousko, F. L., State Estimation for Dynamic Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kurzhanski, A. and Vályi, I., Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation and Control. Boston, MA: Birkhauser, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzhanskiy, A. A. and Varaiya, P., “Ellipsoidal toolbox,” EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Tech. Rep., May 2006.Google Scholar
Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L., Convex Optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullen, P., “Volumes of projections of unit cubes,” Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 278–280, May 1984.Google Scholar
Dörfler, F., Chertkov, M., and Bullo, F., “Synchronization in complex oscillator networks and smart grids,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 2005–2010, 2013.Google Scholar
Zholbaryssov, M. and Domínguez-García, A. D., “Convex relaxations of the network flow problem under cycle constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, pp. 1–1, 2019.Google Scholar
Borkowska, B., “Probabilistic load flow,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 752–759, Aug. 1974.Google Scholar
Sauer, P., “Generalized stochastic power flow algorithm,” PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 1977.Google Scholar
Norris, J., Markov Chains.Google Scholar
Brémaud, P., Markov chains: Gibbs fields, Monte Carlo simulation, and queues.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. and Proschan, F., Mathematical Theory of Reliability. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.Google Scholar
Endrenyi, J., Reliability Modeling in Electric Power Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google Scholar
Shooman, M. L., Probabilistic Reliability: An Engineering Approach. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, 1990.Google Scholar
Rausand, M. and Høyland, A., System Reliability Theory. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience, 2004.Google Scholar
Bouricius, W., Carter, W., and Schneider, P., “Reliability modeling techniques for self-repairing computer systems,” in Proceedings of the 24th National ACM Conference. New York, NY: ACM Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Arnold, T., “The concept of coverage and its effect on the reliability model a repairable system,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. C-22, no. 3, pp. 251–254, March 1973.Google Scholar
Babcock, P., “An introduction to reliability modeling of fault-tolerant systems,” The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, Tech. Rep. CSDL-R-1899, 1986.Google Scholar
Babcock, P., Rosch, G., and Zinchuk, J. J., “An automated environment for optimizing fault-tolerant systems designs,” in Proc. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, pp. 360–367, 1991.Google Scholar
Kumar, P. R. and Varaiya, P., Stochastic Systems: Estimation, Identification and Adaptive Control. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
Cady, S. T., Zholbaryssov, M., Domínguez-García, A. D., and Hadjicostis, C. N., “A distributed frequency regulation architecture for islanded inertialess AC microgrids,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1961–1977, 2017.Google Scholar
Horn, R. A. and Johnson, C. R., Topics in Matrix Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. C., An Introduction to Stochastic Differential Equations. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2013.Google Scholar
Øskendal, B., Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications, 6th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Brockett, R., Lecture Notes on Stochastic Control. [Online] www.eeci-institute.eu/pdf/M15/M15/RogersStochastic.pdf, 2009.Google Scholar
Girard, A., “Reachability of uncertain linear systems using zonotopes,” Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, pp. 291–305, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christine Chen, Yu, Jiang, Xichen, and Domínguez-García, A. D., “Impact of power generation uncertainty on power system static performance,” in North American Power Symposium, pp. 1–5, 2011.Google Scholar
Jiang, X. and Domínguez-García, A. D., “A zonotope-based method for capturing the effect of variable generation on the power flow,” in North American Power Symposium, pp. 1–6, 2014.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. and Alvarado, F., “Interval arithmetic in power flow analysis,” IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1341–1349, Aug. 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzhanskiy, A. and Varaiya, P., “Ellipsoidal techniques for reachability analysis of discrete-time linear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 26–38, Jan. 2007.Google Scholar
Kurzhanski, A. and Varaiya, P., “Ellipsoidal techniques for reachability analysis. Parts I & II,” Optimization Methods and Software, vol. 17, pp. 177–237, Feb. 2002.Google Scholar
Hope, E., Jiang, X., and Domínguez-García, A., “A reachability-based method for large-signal behavior verification of DC-DC converters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 2944–2955, Dec. 2011.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. and Domínguez-García, A., “A method to study the effect of renewable resource variability on power system dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1978–1989, Nov. 2012.Google Scholar
Krein, P. T., Elements of Power Electronics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sauer, P. and Pai, M., Power System Dynamics and Stability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Horn, R. A. and Johnson, C. R., Matrix Analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Golub, G. H. and Van Loan, C. F., Matrix Computations, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rudin, W., Principles of Mathematical Analysis.Google Scholar
Bergen, R. B. and Vittal, V., Power systems analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.Google Scholar
Glover, J., Sarma, M., and Overbye, T., Power System Analysis and Design. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2011.Google Scholar