Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 June 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Languages in Space and TimeModels and Methods from Complex Systems Theory, pp. 179 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abrams, D.
M., and Strogatz, S.
H.. 2003.
‘Modelling the Dynamics of Language
Death’. Nature
424: 900.Google Scholar
Albert, R., and
Barabasi, A-L., 2002.
‘Statistical Mechanics of Complex
Networks’. Review of Modern
Physics
74: 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alinei, M.
2006. ‘Darwinism, Traditional
Linguistics and the New Palaeolithic Continuity Theory of Language
Evolution’. Evolutionary
Epistemology, Language and Culture: A Non-Adaptationist, Systems
Theoretical Approach, edited by
Gontier, Nathalie,
Bendegem, Jean Paul Van, and
Aerts, Diederik,
121–147. Dordrecht:
Springer
Netherlands.Google Scholar
Amano, T. et al.
2014. ‘Global Distribution and
Drivers of Language Extinction Risk’.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences
281 (1793):
20141574.Google Scholar
Apostolico, A., and
Galil, Z.. 1997.
Pattern Matching Algorithms. Oxford
University Press.Google Scholar
Aracil, L.
1982. ‘El Bilinguisme Com a
Mite’. Papers de
Sociolinguistica, 393–57.
Barcelona: La
Magrana. (in Catalan).Google Scholar
Axelrod, R.
1997. ‘The Dissemination of
Culture—A Model with Local Convergence and Global
Polarization’. Journal of Conflict
Resolution
41 (2):
203–226.Google Scholar
Axelsen, J.
B., and
Manrubia, S.. 2014.
‘River Density and Landscape Roughness are
Universal Determinants of Linguistic
Diversity’. Proceedings of the Royal
Society B: Biological Sciences
281 (1788):
20141179.Google Scholar
Baggs, I., and
Freedman, H. I.. 1990.
‘A Mathematical Model for the Dynamical
Interactions between a Unilingual and Bilingual Population:
Persistance versus Extinction’.
Journal of Mathematical Sociology
16: 51.Google Scholar
Baggs, I., and
Freedman, H. I.. 1993.
‘Can the Speakers of a Dominated Language
Survive as Unilinguals—A Mathematical-model of
Bilingualism’. Mathematical and
Computer Modelling
18 (6):
9–18.Google Scholar
Baggs, I.,
Freedman, H. I., and
Aiello, W. G.. 1990.
‘Equilibrium Characteristics in Models of
Unilingual-Bilingual Population
Interactions’. Ocean Waves Mechanics,
Computational Fluid Dynamics, and Mathematical Modelling:
Proceedings of the 11th International Annual Conference of the
Canadian Applied Mathematics Society, edited by
Rahman, M..
Southampton:
Computational Mechanics Pub.
Ltd.Google Scholar
Bakalis, E., and
Galani, A.. 2012.
‘Modeling Language Evolution: Aromanian, an
Endangered Language in Greece’.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications
391 (20):
4963–4969.Google Scholar
Barabási, A-L, and
Oltvai, Z. N., 2004.
‘Network Biology: Understanding the
Cell’s Functional Organization.
Nature Reviews
5:
101–113.Google Scholar
Baronchelli, A.
2016. ‘A Gentle Introduction to the
Minimal Naming Game’. Belgian Journal
of Linguistics
30 (1):
171–192.Google Scholar
Baronchelli, A.
2018. ‘The Emergence of Consensus: A
Primer’. Royal Society Open
Science
5: 172189.Google Scholar
Baronchelli, A.,
Dall’Asta, L.,
Barrat, A., and
Loreto, V.. 2006b.
‘Topology-induced Coarsening in Language
Games’. Physical Review EA
73 (1):
015102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baronchelli, A.,
Dall’Asta, L.,
Barrat, A., and
Loreto, V.. 2007.
‘The Role of Topology on the Dynamics of the
Naming Game’. European Physics
Journal Special. Topics
143:
233–235.Google Scholar
Baronchelli, A.,
Felici, M.,
Loreto, V.,
Caglioti, E., and Luc Steels.
2006a. ‘Sharp Transition towards
Shared Vocabularies in Multi-agent Systems’.
Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and
Experiment
2006 (6):
P06014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baronchelli, A.,
Loreto, V., and
Steels, L.. 2008.
‘In-depth Analysis of the Naming Game
Dynamics: The Homogeneous Mixing Case’.
International Journal of Modern Physics. C
19 (5):
785–812.Google Scholar
Beijering, K.,
Gooskens, C., and
Heeringa, W.. 2008.
‘Predicting Intelligibility and Perceived
Linguistic Distance by Means of the Levenshtein
Algorithm’. Linguistics in the
Netherlands
25 (1):
13–24.Google Scholar
Berruto, C.
1989. ‘On the Typology of Linguistic
Repertoires’. In Status and Functions
of Languages and Language Varieties edited by
Ammon, U.. Berlin
& New York: de
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bettinger, R., and
Baumhoff, M.. 1982.
‘The Numic Spread: Great Basin Cultures in
Competition’. American
Antiquity
47 (3):
485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnick, R.
I.
1987. ‘On the Classification of the
Mongolian Languages’. Central Asiatic
Journal
31 (3/4):
178–195.Google Scholar
Blevins, J.
2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of
Sound Patterns. Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L.
1926. ‘A Set of Postulates for the
Science of Language’.
Language
2 (3):
153–164.Google Scholar
Blythe, R.
A.
2015. ‘Colloquium: Hierarchy of
Scales in Language Dynamics’. The
European Physical Journal B
88 (11):
295.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, R., and
Heeringa, W.. 2002.
‘De Invloed van Dominante Talen op het Lexicon
en de Fonologie van Sardische Dialecten’.
Gramma/TTT
9 (1):
45–84.Google Scholar
Borg, I., and
Groenen, P.. 2005.
Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and
Applications. New York:
Springer.Google Scholar
Box, G. E.
P.
1976. ‘Science and
Statistics’. Journal of the American
Statistical Association
71 (356):
791–799.Google Scholar
Brown, C.
H., Holman, Eric
W.,
Wichmann, Søren, and
Velupilla, Viveka. 2008.
‘Automated Classification of the
World’s Languages: A Description of the Method and
Preliminary Results. STUF, Berlin
61 (4):
285–308.Google Scholar
Brown, C.
H., Holman, Eric
W., and
Wichmann, Søren. 2013.
‘Sound Correspondences in the World’s
Languages’. Language
89 (1):
4–29.Google Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine,
Le Dû, Jean, and
Le Berre, Yves. 2005.
Lectures de l’Atlas Linguistique de la France de J.
Gilleron et E. Edmont. Du temps dans
l’espace. CTHS.Google Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, Guylaine, Darlu Pierre,
Gaillard-Corvaglia Antonella, Léonard Jean Léo, and Sauzet
Patric. 2011. ‘Exploration
Cladistique de l’ALLOc. In
10éme CIEO (Congrés de l’Associacion
Iternacionala d’Estudis Occitans, edited by :
Garabato, C. Alen,
Torreilles, C., and
Verny, M. J..
Béziers, France:
Lambert-Lucas.Google Scholar
Burridge, J.
2017. ‘Spatial Evolution of Human
Dialects’. Physics Review X
7 (Jul): 031008.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
L., and Hopper, P.
J.. 2001.
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure.
Typological Studies in Language. John
Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L.
1987. ‘Tzeltal Dialects: New and
Old’. Anthropological
Linguistics
29 (4):
549–570.Google Scholar
Capen, C.
J.
1996. Diccionario mazateco de
Chiquihuitlán.
Tucson: Instituto
Lingüístico de
Verano.Google Scholar
Capitán, J.
A., and
Manrubia, S.. 2014.
The Ecology of Human Linguistic Groups,
255. Cd. de
México: EditoraC3
CopIt-arXives.Google Scholar
Carro, A.,
Toral, R., and
San, M.. 2016.
‘Coupled Dynamics of Node and Link States in
Complex Networks: A Model for Language
Competition’. New Journal of
Physics
18 (11):
113056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casad, E.
H., and Willett, T.
L., eds. 2000.
Uto-Aztecan: Structural, Temporal, and Geographic
Perspectives: Papers in Memory of Wick R. Miller by the Friends of
Uto-Aztecan. Hermosillo, Sonora,
México: Editorial Unison,
División de Humanidades y Bellas Artes, Universidad de
Sonora.Google Scholar
Castellano, C.,
Fortunato, S., and
Loreto, V.. 2009.
‘Statistical Physics of Social
Dynamics’. Review Modern
Physics
81: 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelló, X., et al.
2007. ‘Anomalous Lifetime
Distributions and Topological Traps in Ordering
Dynamics’. Europhysics
Letters
79: 66006.Google Scholar
Castelló, X.,
Baronchelli, A., and
Loreto, V.. 2009.
‘Consensus and Ordering in Language
Dynamics’. European Physics Journal
B
71: 557.Google Scholar
Castelló, X., et al.
2011. ‘Viability and Resilience
in the Dynamics of Language Competition’. In
Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems: Concepts,
Methods and Case Studies from Ecology and Society, edited
by Deuant, G., and
Gilbert, N.,
39–74
Springer.Google Scholar
Castelló, X.,
Eguíluz, V. M., and
Miguel, M. S.. 2006.
‘Ordering Dynamics with Two Non-excluding
Options: Bilingualism in Language
Competition’. New Journal
Physics
8 (12):
306.Google Scholar
Cataldo, D.
M., Bamberg, M.
A., and
Lucio, V.. 2018.
‘Speech, Stone Tool-making and the Evolution
of Language’. PLOS ONE
13 (1):
1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cedergren, H. C.
J.
1973. ‘The Interplay of Social and
Linguistic Factors in Panama’. PhD Diss.,
Cornell
University.Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel.
1994. ‘Semiotics for Beginners’.
Visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/.Google Scholar
Chen, G., and
Lou, Y.. 2010.
Naming Game: Models, Simulations and Analysis (Emergence,
Complexity and Computation).
Switzerland:
Springer.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa
Lectures (Studies in Generative Grammar) Vol.
9. Dordrecht & Cinnaminson
(NJ):
Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1986. Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin,
and Use. New York:
Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1990. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory
of Government and Binding. New
York: M.I.T.
Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M.
H., and
Kirby, S., eds. 2003.
Language Evolution.
Oxford: Oxford
University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A.,
Fox, C., and
Lappin, S., eds. 2010.
The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural
Language Processing. Oxford:
Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clifford, P., and
Sudbury, A.. 1973.
‘AModel For Spatial
Conflict’. Biometrika
60 (3):
581–588.Google Scholar
Coelho, M. T.
P. et al. 2019.
‘Drivers of Geographical Patterns of North
American Language Diversity’.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences
286 (1899):
20190242.Google Scholar
Collinge, N.
E.
1985. The Laws of Indo-European. Amsterdam Studies
in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science.
Amsterdam: John
Benjamins Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Colucci, R.,
Mira, Jorge, Nieto, J.
J., and
Otero-Espinar, M. V.. 2016.
‘Non Trivial Coexistence Conditions for a
Model of Language Competition Obtained by Bifurcation
Theory’. Acta Applicandae
Mathematicae
146 (1):
187–203.Google Scholar
Corvaglia-Gaillard, A.
2012. From Cladistics to Linguistics: A Study
Applied to Southern Italo-Romance and Salentinian Dialects.
Alessandria: Edizioni
dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Cowgill, W.
2000. ‘A Search for Universals in
In-European Diachronic Morphology’. In
New Approaches to Old Problems: Issues in Romance Historical
Linguistics. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Vol.
210. Amsterdam:
John Benjamins Pub.
Co.Google Scholar
Dalmasso, D.,
dellâĂŹAquila, V.,
Léonard, J. L.. 2012.
2012 ALNum, Numic Cognate Database (Uto-Nahua, Great Bassin, USA), 298
cognats, 5 languages. Tech. rept. (See final report of the IUF, 2009-14,
MAmP project.
http://lpp.in2p3.fr/IMG/pdf/jean_le_o_le_onard_iuf_2889-14-final_report.pdf.)Google Scholar
Darwin, C.
1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under
Domestication. London:
John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.
2004. Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to
Sex. The Barnes & Noble Library of Essential
Reading. New York:
Barnes & Noble
Books.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.
2007. On the Origin of Species: By Means of
Natural Selection Or the Preservation of Favored Races in the
Struggle for Life. Cosimo Classics
Science. New York:
Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar
Dauxois, T.
2008. ‘Fermi, Pasta, Ulam, and a
Mysterious Lady’. Physics
Today
61 (1):
55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, I.
1966. ‘Numic Consonantal
Correspondences’. International
Journal of American Linguistics
32:
124–140.Google Scholar
de
Oliveira, P. M.
C.,
Stauffer, D.,
Wichmann, Søren, and
de Oliveira, S. M.. 2008.
‘A Computer Simulation of Language
Families’. Journal of
Linguistics
44 (3):
659–675.Google Scholar
de
Oliveira, P. M.
C., Lima, F. W.
S., Sousa, A.
O., de Oliveira, S.
M.,
Stauffer, D., and
Schulze, C.. 2007.
‘Bit-strings and Other Modifications of
Viviane Model for Language Competition’.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications
376:
609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de
Oliveira, Viviane
M., Campos, Paulo
R.,
Gomes, Marcelo A., and
Tsang, Ing Ren. 2006a.
‘Bounded Fitness Landscapes and the Evolution
of the Linguistic Diversity’. Physica
A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
368 (1):
257–261.Google Scholar
de
Oliveira, Viviane
M., Gomes, Marcelo
A., and
Tsang, Ing Ren. 2006b.
‘Theoretical Model for the Evolution of the
Linguistic Diversity’. Physica A:
Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
361 (1):
361–370.Google Scholar
de
Saussure, Ferdinand.
1915. Course in General Linguistics.
Translated, with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin.
New York:
McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Di
Chio, C., and
Chio, P. Di. 2006.
‘Simulation Model for the Evolution of
Language with Spatial Topology’. In
The Evolution of Language. Game Theory and Linguistic
Meaning, Vol. 18, edited by
Cangelosi, Angelo, and
Smith, Andrew D. M., and
Smith, Kenny,
51–58.
Singapore: World
Scientific.Google Scholar
Di
Chio, C., and
Chio, P. Di. 2007.
‘Evolutionary Models of
Language’. In Game Theory and
Linguistic Meaning, edited by
Pietarinen, Ahki-Viekko.
Amsterdam:
Elsevier.Google Scholar
Di
Chio, C., and
Chio, P. Di. 2009.
‘Evolution of Language with Spatial
Topology’. Interaction
Studies
10 (1):
31–50.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M.
W.
1997. The Rise and Fall of Languages.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.Google Scholar
Djordjević, K. 2004.
Configuration Sociolinguistique, Nationalisme et Politique
Linguistique, Le cas de la
VoÃC̆Âŕvodine, Hier et
Aujourd’hui.
L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Donoso, G., and
Sánchez, D.. 2017.
‘Dialectometric Analysis of Language Variation
in Twitter’. Proceedings of the
Fourth Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects
(VarDial), 16–25.
Valencia, Spain:
Association for Computational
Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dorogovtsev, S.
N., and Mendes, J.
F. F.. 2003.
Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet
and WWW. Oxford:
Oxford University
Press.Google Scholar
Ebeling, W., and
Sokolov, I. M.. 2005.
Statistical Thermodynamics and Stochastic Theory of
Nonequilibrium Processes.
Singapore: World
Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Erdos, P., and
Rényi, A.. 1959.
‘On Random Graphs’.
Publicationes Mathemaiticae (Debrecen)
6:
290–297.Google Scholar
Erdos, P., and
Rényi, A.. 1960.
‘On the Evolution of Random
Graphs’. Publications of the
Mathemitical Institute of Hungary Academy of Sciences
5: 17.Google Scholar
Faisal, A.,
Stout, D.,
Apel, Jan, and
Bradley, Bruce. 2010.
‘The Manipulative Complexity of Lower
Paleolithic Stone Toolmaking’. PLOS
ONE
5 (11):
1–11.Google Scholar
Fermi, E.,
Pasta, J. R., and
Ulam, S. M.. 1955.
‘Studies of Nonlinear Problems’. Los Alamos Scientific
Laboratory Report LA-1940, May.Google Scholar
Fernádndez-Gracia, J.,
Suchecki, Krzyszt,
Ramasco, José J.,
Miguel, Maxi San, and
Eguíluz, Víctor M.. 2014.
‘Is the Voter Model a Model for
Voters?’ Physics Review
Letters
112 (Apr): 158701.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.
A.
1991. Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and
Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened
Languages. Cleavedon:
Multilingual
Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.
A.
2001. ‘Why Is It So Hard to Save a
Threatened Language?’ In Can
Threatened Languages be Saved? edited by
Fishman, J. A.,
1–22.
Clevedon:
Multilingual
Matters.Google Scholar
Fort, J., and
Pujol, T.. 2008.
‘Progress in Front Propagation
Research. Reports on Progress in
Physics
71 (8):
086001.Google Scholar
François, A. 2012.
‘The Fynamics of Linguistic Diversity:
Egalitarian Multilingualism and Power Imbalance among Northern
Vanuatu Languages’. International
Journal of the Sociology of Language
214:
85–110.Google Scholar
François, A. 2014.
‘Trees, Waves and Linkages: Models of Language
Diversification’. In The Routledge
Handbook of Historical Linguistics, edited by
Bowern, Claire and
Evans, Bethwyn,
161–189.
London:
Routledge.Google Scholar
Freedman, H.
I.
1980. Deterministic Mathematical Models in
Population Ecology. New
York: Marcel
Dekker.Google Scholar
Gaillard-Corvaglia, A.,
Léonard, J-L., and
Darlu, P.. 2007.
‘Testing Cladistics on Dialect Networks and
Phyla (Galloromance and Southern
Italoromance)’. In Proceedings of 9th
Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational
Morphology and Phonology,
23–30. SigMorPhon ’07.
Stroudsburg, PA, USA:
Association for Computational
Linguistics.Google Scholar
Giordano, M.
2015. ’Analisi di Modelli Dinamici per
lâĂŹevoluzione di Popolazioni
Bilingue’. M. Phil. thesis,
Universitá degli Studi di
Bari,
Bari.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans.
1981. ‘Éléments
d’Analyse Dialectométrique (avec application á
l’AIS)’. Revue de Linguistique
Romane
45:
349–420.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans.
1984. Dialektometrische Studien: Anhand
Italoromanischer, Rätoromanischer und Galloromanischer
Sprachmaterialien aus AIS und ALF (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift
für romanische Philologie).
Tübingen:
Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans.
1998. ‘On the Nature of Tension in
Dialectal Networks. A Proposal for Interdisciplinary
Research’. In Systems: New Paradigms
for the Human Sciences edited by
Altmann, G., and
Koch, W. A.,
549–571.
Berlin: Walter de
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans.
2003. ‘Regards
Dialectométriques sur les Données de
lâĂŹatlas Linguistique de la France (ALF):
Relations Quantitatives et Structures de
Profondeur’. Estudis
Romànics,
25:
59–96.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans, and Guillaume
Schiltz. 1997. ‘A Dialectometrical
Compilation of CLAE 1 and CLAE 2. Isoglosses and Dialect
Integration’. In Computer Developed
Linguistic Atlas of England (CLAE), Vol.
2, edited by Viereck, W., and
Ramisch, H.,
13–21.
Tübingen: Max
Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans, Slawomir Sobota,
and Edgar Haimerl. 2002. ‘Analyse
Dialectométrique des Structures de Profondeur de
l’ALF’. Revue de Linguistique
Romane
66:
5–63.Google Scholar
Gomes, M. A.
F., Vasconcelos, G.
L.,
Tsang, I. J., and
Tsang, Ing Ren. 1999.
‘Scaling Relations for Diversity of
Languages’. Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and its Applications
271 (3-4):
489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, B., and
Sánchez, D.. 2014.
‘Crowdsourcing Dialect Characterization
through Twitter’. PLOS ONE
9 (11):
1–6.Google Scholar
Government of
Oaxaca. 2016. Microregión 13: Zona
Mazateca. Oaxaca. Secretaria de Desarrollo Social y Humano
http://www.coplade.oaxaca.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Microrregion13.pdf.Google Scholar
Grayson, D.
K.
2011. The Great Basin: A Natural
Prehistory. Berkeley:
University of California
Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.
H.
1960. ‘A Quantitative Approach to the
Morphological Typology of Language’.
International Journal of American Linguistics
26 (3):
178–194.Google Scholar
Grishman, R.
1986. Computational Linguistics: An
Introduction. Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, S.
C.
1955. ‘Lexico-Statistical Skewing
from Dialect Borrowing’.
International Journal of American Linguistics
21 (2):
138–149.Google Scholar
Gudschinsky, S.
C.
1959. ‘Proto-Popotecan. A Comparative
Study of Popolocan and Mixtecan’.
Supplementary to International Journal of American
Linguistics, Memoir 15, 25
(2).Google Scholar
Harney, H.
L.
2003. Bayesian Inference: Data Evaluation and
Decision. New York:
Springer.Google Scholar
Hastie, T.,
Tibshirani, R., and
Friedman, J.. 2009.
The Elements of Statistical Learning. Data Mining,
Inference, and Prediction. 2nd edn. Springer Series in
Statistics. New York:
Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heeringa, W., and
Gooskens, C.. 2003.
‘Norwegian Dialects Examined Perceptually and
Acoustically’. Computers and the
Humanities,
37 (3):
293–315.Google Scholar
Heeringa, W.
J.
2004. ‘Measuring Dialect Pronunciation
Differences using Levenshtein Distance’. PhD thesis,
University of
Groningen.Google Scholar
Heggarty, P.
2017. ‘Towards a (Pre)History of
Linguistic Convergence Areas: Correlates in Genetics, Archaeology,
History and Geography’. In
Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique,
Nouvelle Série, Vol. 23, edited by
Léonard, J. L.,
135–178.Google Scholar
Heinsalu, Els, Marco Patriarca,
and Jean Léo Léonard. 2014.
‘The Role of Bilinguals in Language
Competition’. Advances in Complex
Systems,
17 (1):
1450003.Google Scholar
Hickey, R., ed.
2010. The Handbook of Language Contact.
Hoboken, New Jersey:
Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holley, R., and
Liggett, T.,. 1975.
‘Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting
Systems and the Voter Model’. Annals
of Probability
3: 643.Google Scholar
Holman, Eric
W.,
Wichmann, Søren,
Brown, Cecil H., and
Anthon Eff, E.. 2015.
‘Diffusion and Inheritance of Language and
Culture: A Comparative Perspective’.
Social Evolution &History,
14 (1):
49–64.Google Scholar
Hopkins, N.
1965. ‘Great Basin Prehistory and
Uto-Aztecan’. American
Antiquity
31 (1):
48–60.Google Scholar
Hruschka, D.
J. et al. 2009.
‘Building Social Cognitive Models of Language
Change. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences
13 (11):
464–469.Google Scholar
Hurford, J.
R.
1989. ‘Biological Evolution of the
Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language-acquisition
Device’. Lingua
77:
187–222.Google Scholar
Hurford, J.
R.
1994. ‘Linguistics and Evolution: A
Background Briefing for Non-Linguists’.
Current Opinion Neurobiolgy
10 (1):
149–157.Google Scholar
Hurford, J.
R.
2014. Origins of Language: A Slim Guide.
Oxford: Oxford
University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L.
2011. ‘The Macro-Sudan Belt and
Niger-Congo Reconstruction’. Language
Dynamics and Change
1 (1):
3–49.Google Scholar
Iriberri, N., and
Uriarte, J-R.. 2012.
‘Minority Language and the Stability of
Bilingual Equilibria’. Rationality
and Society
24 (4):
442–462.Google Scholar
Isern, N., and
Fort, J.. 2014.
‘Language Extinction and Linguistic
Fronts’. Journal of The Royal Society
Interface
11 (94):
20140028.Google Scholar
Isern, Sardó,
2011. ‘Front Spreading in Population
Dynamic Models. Theory and Application to the Neolithic
Transition’. PhD thesis, Universitst
de Girona,
Girona.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1985. Semantics and Cognition. Vol.
32. Massachusetts Institute of
Technology.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty.
Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, Vol. 32.
Massachusetts: MIT
Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, C.
C.,
Voigtlander, K., and
Jamieson, A. R.. 1988.
Gramática Mazateca del Municipio de
Chiquihuitlán, Oaxaca. México,
D. F.: Instituto
Lingüístico de
Verano.Google Scholar
Kandler, A., and
Steele, J.. 2008.
‘Ecological Models of Language
Competition’. Biological
Theory
3: 164.Google Scholar
Kandler, A.,
Unger, R., and
Steele, J.. 2010.
‘Language Shift, Bilingualism and the Future
of Britain’s Celtic Languages’.
Philosophical Transactions of the R. Society B
365: 3855.Google Scholar
Karjus, A., and
Ehala, M.. 2018.
‘Testing an Agent-based Model of Language
Choice on Sociolinguistic Survey Data’.
Language Dynamics and Change
8 (2):
219–252.Google Scholar
Karklins, R.
2000. ‘Theories of National
Integration and Developments in Latvia’. In
Integrācija un etnopolitika, edited by
Vēbers, E..
Riga: Latvijas
Universitātes, Filosofijas un Sociologijas
Institūts.Google Scholar
Kaufman, T., and
Justeson, J.. 2003. A
Preliminary Mayan Etymological Dictionary. Foundation for the
Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies.Google Scholar
Keresztes, L.
1999. Development of Mordvin Definite Conjugation.
Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura: Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran
toimituksia, Vol. 233.
Finno-Ugrian
Societya.Google Scholar
Kihm, A. 2006 (October).
‘Le paradoxe créole’. In Faire sens. Colloque en
hommage à Pierre Encrevé.Google Scholar
Kihm, A.
2014. ‘Mazatec Verb Inflection.
Revisiting Pike (1948) and Comparing Four
Dialects’. In Patterns in Mesoamerican
Morphology, edited by
Léonard, J.-L.,
26–76.
Paris: Michel
Houdiard Editeur.Google Scholar
Killion, W.
T., and
Urcid, J.. 2001.
‘The Olmec Legacy: Cultural Continuity and
Change in México’s Southern Gulf Coast
Lowlands’. Journal of Field
Archeology
28:
3–25.Google Scholar
Kirk, P.
L.
1966. ‘Proto-Mazatec
Phonology’. PhD thesis, University of
Washington,
Washington.Google Scholar
Kirk, P.
L.
1970. ‘Dialect Intelligibility
Testing: The Mazatec Study’.
International Journal of American Linguistics
36 (3):
205–211.Google Scholar
Komarova, N.
L., and Nowak, M.
A.. 2001a.
‘The Evolutionary Dynamics of the Lexical
Matrix’. Bulletin of Mathematical
Biology
63 (3):
451–484.Google Scholar
Komarova, N.
L., and Nowak, M.
A.. 2001b.
‘Natural Selection of the Critical Period for
Language Acquisition’. Proceedings:
Biological Sciences
268 (1472):
1189–1196.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B., ed.
2004. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect
Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective.
Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kosmidis, K.,
Halley, J. M., and
Argyrakis, P.. 2005.
‘Language Evolution and Population Dynamics in
a System of Two Interacting Species’.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications
353:
595–612.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1970. The Study of Non-standard English. Eric
reports. Washington:
National Council of Teachers of
English.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1972a. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the
Black English Vernacular. Conduct and Communication.
Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania
Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1972b. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Conduct and
Communication. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania
Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
2006. The Social Stratification of English in New
York City.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, S.
1958. ‘Linguistic Prehistory in the
Great Basin’. International Journal
of American Linguistics
24 (2):
95–100.Google Scholar
Lauristin, M., and
Heidmets, M., eds. 2002.
The Challenge of the Russian Minority: Emerging
Multicultural Democracy in Estonia.
Tartu: Tartu
University Press.Google Scholar
Law, Daniel Aaron.
2011. ‘Linguistic Inheritance, Social
Difference, and the Last Two Thousand Years of Contact Among Lowland
Mayan Languages.’ PhD thesis, The
University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, Tom,
Jansen, Bart,
Tuyls, Karl, and
De Vylder, Bart. 2005.
‘The Evolutionary Language Game: An Orthogonal
Approach’. Journal of Theoretical
Biology
235 (4):
566–582.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo.
2007. ‘The Use of Basque in the Light of the
Theory of Integration’. Cross-Cultural Studies Series CILTRANS
Occasional Papers 103.
http://jll.smallcodes.com/articles.7/-laquo-Donn-eacuteesstatistiques-de-la-pratique-du-basque-e.page.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo.
2014. ‘Le Sprachbund
Mésoaméricain: Instanciation Spatiale
dâĂŹun Concept
Opératoire’. Faits de
Langues
43 (1):
11–40.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo, ed.
2016. Actualité des
Néogrammairiens. Mémoires de
la Société de Linguistique de Paris, Vol.
23. Paris:
EFL - Empirical Foundations of
Linguistics.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo,
Dell’Aquila, Vittorio, and
Gaillard-Corvaglia, Antonella.
2012. ‘The ALMaz (Atlas
Lingüístico Mazateco): From Geolinguistic Data
Processing to Typological Traits’.
STUF, Akademie Verlag
65 (1):
78–94.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo, and
Fulcrand, Julien. 2016.
‘Tonal Inflection and Dialectal Variation in
Mazatec’. In Tone and Inflection: New
Facts and New Perspectives. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and
Monographs [TiLSM], Vol. 269.
Berlin: De
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo,
Patriarca, M.,
Darlu, P., and
Heinsalu, E.. 2015.
‘Modeling Regional Variation from EAS:
Complexity and Communal Aggregates’. In
Linguistic Variation in the Basque Language and Education-I
âĂŤ Euskararen Bariazioa eta Bariazioaren
Irakaskuntza-I, edited by
Olabarri, G.,
Aurrekoetxea, A.,
Romero, A., and
Lejarreta, A. E.,
145–172. Euskal
Herriko Unibertsitateko Argi-talpen Zerbitzua – Servicio
Editorial de la Universidad del País
Vasco.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo,
Patriarca, Marco,
Heinsalu, Els,
Sharma, Kiran, and
Chakraborti, Anirban. 2017.
‘Patterns of Linguistic Diffusion in Space and
Time: The Case of Mazatec’. In
Econophysics and Sociophysics: Recent Progress and Future
Directions,. edited by
Abergel, F., et al. 227–251,
Chapter 17 New Economic Windows. New
York: Springer.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo.
2019. ‘Patterns of Linguistic
Diffusion in Space and Time: The Case of
Mazatec’. In Complexity Applications in
Language and Communication Sciences edited by
Massip-Bonet, A. M.,
Bel-Enguix, G., and
Bastardas-Boada, A.. New
York: Springer.Google Scholar
Léonard, Jean Léo,
Vulin, Clément, and
Darlu, Pierre. 2010.
‘Application de la Cladistique aux Langues
Mésoaméricaines’. Journée
d’études de la Société Franćaise
de Systématique.Google Scholar
Levenshtein, V. 1.
1966. ‘Binary Codes Capable of
Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and
Reversals’. Soviet Physics
Doklady
10 (8):
707–710.Google Scholar
Liggett, T.
M.
1999. Stochastic Interacting Sysyems: Contact,
Voter and Exclusion Processes. New
York:
Springer.Google Scholar
Lipowska, D.
2011. ‘Naming Game and Computational
Modelling of Language Evolution’.
Computational Methods in Science and Technology
17 (1–2):
41–51.Google Scholar
Lipowski, A., and
Lipowska, D.. 2008.
‘Bio-linguistic Transition and Baldwin Effect
in an Evolutionary Naming-game Model’.
International Journey of Modern Physics C
19 (3):
399–407.Google Scholar
Lipowski, A., and
Lipowska, D.. 2009.
‘Language Structure in the n-object Naming
Game’. Physics Review E
80 (5):
056107.Google Scholar
Lipowski, A., and
Lipowska, D.. 2018.
‘Emergence of Linguistic Conventions in
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning’.
PLOS ONE
13 (11):
1–18Google Scholar
Lomolino, M.
V., Riddle, B.
R., and
Brown, J. H.. 2006.
Biogeography. Sunderland,
Masachusetts: Sinauer
Associates.Google Scholar
Loreto, V., et al.
2011. ‘Statistical Physics of
Language Dynamics’. Journal of
Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment
2011 (4):
P04006.Google Scholar
Madsen, D.
1975. ‘Dating Paiute-Shoshoni
Expansion in the Great Basin’.
American Antiquity
40 (1):
82–86.Google Scholar
Marchetti, G.,
Marco, M., and
Heinsalu, E.. 2019.
‘A Bird’s-Eye View of Naming Game Dynamics’,
arXiv.orgGoogle Scholar
Toledo, E.
M. (B’alam Q’uq).
1999. La Cuestión
Akateko-q’anjob’al, Una Comparación
Gramatical. Guatemala:
Universidad Mariano Gálvez de Guatemala,
Facultad de Humanidades, Escuela de
Lingüística.Google Scholar
McMahon, A., and
McMahon, R.. 2013.
Evolutionary Linguistics.
Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.Google Scholar
Mende, W, and
Wermke, K.. 2006.
‘A Long Way to Understanding Cultural
Evolution’. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences,
29 (4):
358.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R.
2011. The Cambridge Handbook of
Sociolinguistics. Cambridge:
Cambridge University
Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G.
A.
1970. The Psychology of Communication: Seven
Essays. London:
Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., and
Milroy, L.. 1978.
‘Belfast: Change and Variation in an Urban
Vernacular’. In Sociolinguistic
Patterns in British English, edited by
Trudgill, P..
Pennsylvania:
University Park
Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, L.
1980. Language and Social Networks.
Language in Society. Hoboken, New Jersey:
Wiley.Google Scholar
Minett, J.
W., and Wang, W.
S-Y.
2008. ‘Modelling Endangered
Languages: The Effects of Bilingualism and Social
Structure’. Lingua
118: 19.Google Scholar
Mira, J., and
Paredes, A.. 2005.
‘Interlinguistic Similarity and Language Death
Dynamics’. Europhysics
Letters
69: 1031.Google Scholar
Mira, J.,
Seoane, L. F., and
Nieto, J. J.. 2011.
‘The Importance of Interlinguistic Similarity
and Stable Bilingualism When two Languages
Compete’. New Journal of Physics
13: 033007.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. J.
H. et al. 2015.
‘Experimental Evidence for the Co-evolution of
Hominin Tool-making Teaching and Language’.
Nature Communications
6 (Jan): 6029.Google Scholar
Morpurgo, A. D.
1998. Nineteenth-century Linguistics.
History of linguistics, Vol. 4. London
& New York:
Routledge.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and
Change. London:
Continuum International Publishing
Company.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
2013a. ‘The Ecology of Language: Some
Evolutionary Perspectives’. In Da
Fonologiaá Ecolínguistica – Ensaios em
homenajem a Hildo Honório do Couto, edited by
do Couto, E. K. N. N.,
de Albuquerque, D. B., and
de Araújo, G. P..
Brasilia:
Thesaurus.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
2013b. ‘The Emergence of Complexity
in Language: An Evolutionary Perspective’. In
Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication, and
Society, edited by
Massip-Bonet, A. and
Bastardas-Boada, A..
Heidelberg:
Springer.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.
2013c. ‘What African Linguistics Can
Contribute to Evolutionary Linguistics’. In
Selected Proceedings of the 43th Annual Conference on
African Linguistics edited by Olanik, O.
O. and
Sanders, K. W.. Somerville
(MA): Cascadilla Proceedings
Project.Google Scholar
Murray, J.
D.
2003. Mathematical Biology II: Spatial Models and
Biomedical Application. New
York:
SpringerGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, J., and
Kretzschmar, W.. 2003.
‘Introducing Computational Techniques in
Dialectometry’. Computers and the
Humanities
37 (3):
245–255.Google Scholar
Nichols, J.
1986. ‘Head-Marking and
Dependent-Marking Grammar’.
Language
62 (1):
56–119.Google Scholar
Nie, Lin-Fei,
Teng, Zhi-Dong,
Nieto, Juan J., and Il Hyo Jung.
2013. ‘Dynamic Analysis of a Two-Language
Competitive Model with Control Strategies’. Mathematical
Problems in Engineering 654619.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A., Krakauer, D.
C., and
Dress, A.. 1999a.
‘An Error Limit for the Evolution of
Language’. Proceedings of the Royal
Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
266 (1433):
2131–2136.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A.
2000. ‘Evolutionary Biology of
Language’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc.
London B Biol. Sci.,
355 (1403):
1615–22.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A., Komarova, N.
L., and
Niyogi, P.. 2001.
‘Evolution of Universal
Grammar’. Science
291 (5501):
114–118.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A., Komarova, N.
L., and
Niyogi, P.. 2002.
‘Computational and Evolutionary Aspects of
Language’. Nature
417 (6889):
611–617.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A., and Krakauer, D.
C.. 1999.
‘The Evolution of
Language’. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences,
96 (14):
8028–8033.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin
A., Plotkin, J.
B., and
Krakauer, D. C.. 1999b.
‘The Evolutionary Language
Game’. Journal of Theoretical
Biology
200 (2):
147–162.Google Scholar
Oliphant, M., and
Batali, J.. 1996.
‘Learning and the Emergence of Coordinated
Communication’. The Newsletter of the
Center for Research on Language
11 (1):
146.Google Scholar
Ostler, N.
2005. Empires of the Word: A Language History of
the World. London:
Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Otero-Espinar, M.
V., Seoane, Luis
F.,
Nieto, Juan J., and Jorge Mira.
2013. ‘An Analytic Solution of a
Model of Language Competition with Bilingualism and Interlinguistic
Similarity’. Physica D: Nonlinear
Phenomena
264:
17–26.Google Scholar
Owolabi, K.
M., and Gómez-Aguilar, J.
F..
2018. ‘Numerical Simulations of
Multilingual Competition Dynamics with Nonlocal
Derivative’. Chaos, Solitons &
Fractals
117:
175–182.Google Scholar
Palau, A.
D., ed. 2002.
Una Radiografia Social de la Llengua Catalana.
Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Cultura,
Cossetánia.Google Scholar
Paradowski, M.
B.
2010. ‘A Complexity Science
Perspective on Language Spread’. In
Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on
Experimental Linguistics, edited by
Botinis, A.,
137–140.
Athens: University of
Athens.Google Scholar
Paradowski, M.
B., Chih-Chun Chen, Agnieszka
Cierpich, and Lukasz Jonak. 2012.
‘From Linguistic Innovation in Blogs to
Language Learning in Adults: What Do Interaction Networks Tell
Us?’ In Proceedings of the Conference
on ‘Social Computing, Social Cognition, Social Networks, and
Multiagent Systems’, edited by
Dodig-Crnkovic, G., et al.
The Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence
and Simulation of Behaviour
(aisb.org.uk).Google Scholar
Pastor-Satorras, Romualdo,
Castellano, Claudio,
Van Mieghem, Piet, and
Vespignani, Alessandro. 2015.
‘Epidemic Processes in Complex
Networks’. Review of Modern
Physics
87 (3):
925–979.Google Scholar
Patriarca, M., and
Heinsalu, E.. 2009.
‘Influence of Geography on Language
Competition’. Physica A
388: 174.Google Scholar
Patriarca, M., and
Lepp, T.änen. 2004.
‘Modeling Language
Competition’. Physica A
338: 296.Google Scholar
Patriarca, Marco,
Castelló, Xavier,
Uriarte, José Ramón,
Eguíluz, Víctor M., and
San Miguel, Maxi. 2012.
‘Modeling Two-language Competition
Dynamics’. Adv. Comp. Syst.
15 (3&4):
1250048.Google Scholar
Penn, M., and
Zalesne, K.. 2007.
Microtrends: Surprising Tales of the Way we Live
Today. London:
Penguin.Google Scholar
Pike, K.
L.
1948. Tone Languages: A Technique for Determining
the Number and Type of Pitch Contrasts in a Language, with Studies
in Tonemic Substitution and Fusion. Linguistics.
Ann Arbor, Michigan:
University of Michigan
Press.Google Scholar
Pinasco, J.
P., and
Romanelli, L.. 2006.
‘Coexistence of Languages is
Possible’. Physical A
361: 355.Google Scholar
Plotkin, J., and
Nowak, M.. 2001.
‘Major Transitions in Language
Evolution’. Entropy
3 (4):
227–246.Google Scholar
Polian, G., Jean Léo
Léonard, Els Heinsalu, and Marco Patriarca. 2014.
‘Variación Dialectal Del Tseltal (Maya
Occidental) En Los Ámbitos Morfológico,
Fonológico Y Léxico: Un Enfoque
Holístico’. In Patterns In
Mesoamerican Morphology edited by
Léonard, J. L. and
Kihm, A.. Michel
Houdiard Éditeur.Google Scholar
Poppe, N.
1955. Introduction to Comparative Mongolian
Studies. Helsinki:
Finno-Ugrian Society (SUS –
Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura).Google Scholar
Pucci, L.,
Gravino, P., and
Servedio, V. D. P.. 2014.
‘Modeling the Emergence of a New Language:
Naming Game with Hybridization’. In
Self-Organizing Systems, edited by
Elmenreich, W.,
Dressler, F., and
Loreto, V.,
78–89. Berlin,
Heidelberg:
Springer.Google Scholar
Ramírez, A.
G.
1996. ‘Dialectología y
Sociolinguístíca’. In
Manual de Dialectología Hispánica: El
Español de España edited by
Alvar, M.,
37–48. Ariel Letras.
Barcelona: Editorial
Planeta.Google Scholar
Rannap, J.
2017. ’Mathematical Analysis of Numic
Languages’. Bachelor’s thesis,
University of Tartu,
Tartu.Google Scholar
Ross, John, and
Arkin, A. P.. 2009.
‘Complex Systems: From Chemistry to Systems
Biology’. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences
106 (16):
6433–6434.Google Scholar
Rowe, B.
M., and Levine, D.
P.. 2015.
A Concise Introduction to Linguistics.
London:
Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheer, T.
2004. A Lateral Theory of Phonology: What is CVCV,
and Why Should It Be? Vol. 1.
Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, T.
2011. A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface
Theories: How Extra-Phonological Information is Treated in Phonology
since Trubetzkoy’s Grenzsignale. Vol. 1.
Berlin: Mouton de
Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, T.
2012. Direct Interface and One-Channel Translation.
A Non-Diacritic Theory of the Morphosyntax-Phonology
Interface. Vol. 2. Berlin:
Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Scheer, T., and
Ségéral, P..
2016. ‘L’actualité
des Néogrammairiens’. Memoires
de la Société de Linguistique de Paris
23:
15–68.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J.
2017. Die Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse der
Indogermanischen Sprachen.
Weimar: H.
Bohlau.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, H. E.
M.
1980. Pidgin and Creole Languages, Selected Essays
by Hugo Schuchardt (Translated by Glenn G. Gilbert.).
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.Google Scholar
Schulze, C., and
Stauffer, D.. 2005.
‘Monte Carlo Simulation of the Rise and the
Fall of Languages’. International
Journal of Modern Physics C
16 (05):
781–787.Google Scholar
Schulze, C., and
Stauffer, D.. 2006.
‘Recent Developments in Computer Simulations
of Language Competition’. Computing
in Science & Engineering
8 (3):
60–67.Google Scholar
Schulze, C., and
Stauffer, D.. 2007.
‘Competition of Languages in the Presence of a
Barrier’. Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and its Applications
379 (2):
661–664.Google Scholar
Schulze, C.,
Stauer, D., and
Wichrnann, S.. 2008.
‘Birth, Survival and Death of Languages by
Monte Carlo Simulation’.
Communications in Computational Physics
3 (2):
271–294.Google Scholar
Schumann, O.
1983. ‘La Relación
Lingüística Chuj-tojolabal. In
Los Legítimos Hombres. Aproximación
Antropológica al Grupo Tojolabal, Vol.
1, edited by Ruz, M.
H..
México:
Universida Nacional Autónoma de
México.Google Scholar
Schwämmle, V.
2005. ‘Simulation for Competition of
Languages with an Aging Sexual Population’.
International Journal of Modern Physics C
16 (10):
1519–1526.Google Scholar
Shaul, D., and
Ortman, S.. 2014.
A Prehistory of Western North America: The Impact of
Uto-Aztecan Languages.
Albuquerque:
University of New México
Press.Google Scholar
Shen, Z.
1997. ‘Exploring the Dynamic Aspect
of Sound Change’ (PhD thesis).
Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 11.
Hong Kong: Chinese
University Press.Google Scholar
Sofuoglu, Y., and
Ozalp, N.. 2017.
‘Fractional Order Bilingualism Model Without
Conversion from Dominant Unilingual Group to Bilingual
Group’. Differential Equations and
Dynamical Systems
25 (1):
1–9.Google Scholar
Solé, R.
V.,
Corominas-Murtra, B., and
Fortuny, J.. 2010.
‘Diversity, Competition, Extinction: the
Ecophysics of Language Change. Journal of
The Royal Society Interface
7:
1647–1664.Google Scholar
Sørensen, A.
1967. ‘Multilingualism in the
Northwest Amazon’. American
Anthropologist
69:
670–684.Google Scholar
Stauffer, D., and
Schulze, C.. 2005.
‘Microscopic and Macroscopic Simulation of
Competition Between Languages’.
Physics Life Reviews
2: 89.Google Scholar
Stauffer, D.,
Schulze, C.,
Welington, F.
Lima, S.,
Wichmann, S., and
Solomon, Sorin.
2006.‘Non-equilibrium and
Irreversible Simulation of Competition Among
Languages’. Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and Its Applications
371 (2):
719–724.Google Scholar
Stauffer, D.,
Castelló, X.,
Eguiluz, V. M., and Maxi San Miguel.
2007. ‘Microscopic
Abrams-Strogatz Model of Language Competition.
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics andits
Applications
374 (2):
835–842.Google Scholar
Stenzel, K.
2005. ‘Multilingualism in the
Northwest Amazon, Revisited’. In
Memorias del Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de
Latinoamerica, Vol. II.
University of Texas at
Austin.Google Scholar
Strogatz, S.
H.
1994. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With
Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and
Engineering. Reading,
Masachusetts: Perseus
Books.Google Scholar
Sutantawibul, Chosila,
Xiao, Pengcheng,
Richie, Sarah, and
Fuentes-Rivero, Daniela. 2018.
‘Revisit Language Modeling Competition and
Extinction: A Data-Driven Validation’.
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
6 (7):
1558–1570.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.
J.
2003. ‘Parallel Extinction Risk and
Global Distribution of Languages and
Species’. Nature
423 (May): 276.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.
O. Anna Tsendina, Anastasia
Karlsson, and Vivan Franzen. 2005. The Phonology of
Mongolian. Oxford:
Oxford University
Press.Google Scholar
Taagepera, R.
2008. Making Social Sciences More Scientific: The
Need for Predictive Models.
Oxford: Oxford
University Press.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M., and
Gibson, K. R.. 2012.
The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution. Oxford
Handbooks in Linguistics. Oxford:
Oxford University
Press.Google Scholar
Teşileanu, T., and
Meyer-Ortmanns, H.. 2006.
‘Competition of Languages and their Hamming
Distance’. International Journal of
Modern Physics C
17 (2):
259–278.Google Scholar
Toivonen, Riitta,
Castelló, Xavier,
Eguíluz, Víctor M.,
Saramäki, Jari,
Kaski, K., and Maxi San Miguel.
2009. ‘Broad Lifetime
Distributions for Ordering Dynamics in Complex
Networks’. Physics Review E
79: 016109.Google Scholar
Tort, P.,
Schleicher, A., and
Modigliani, D.. 1980.
Évolutionnisme et Linguistique.
Paris: J.
Vrin.Google Scholar
Trapa, P.
E., and Nowak, M.
A.. 2000.
‘Nash Equilibria for an Evolutionary Language
Game’. Journal of Mathematical
Biology
41 (2):
172–188.Google Scholar
Tria, Francesca,
Servedio, Vito DP,
Mufwene, Salikoko S., and
Loreto, Vittorio. 2015.
‘Modeling the Emergence of Contact
Languages’. PLOS ONE
10 (4):
1–11.Google Scholar
Tuite, K.
1988. ‘Kartvelian Morphoyntax: Number
Agreement and Morphosyntactic Orientation in the South Caucasian
Languages’. PhD thesis, Chicago
University.Google Scholar
Unamuno, Lorea,
Ensunza, Ariane,
Iglesias, Aitor, and
Ormaetxea, Jose Luis. 2012 (01).
‘EAS Project: First Data on Syntactic
Variation in the Basque Language. In
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Limits and
Areas in Dialectology (LimiAr 2011, Lisbon) edited by
Pérez, A. et al.,
225–235.Google Scholar
Uriarte, J-R.
2016. A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Minority
Language Use in Multilingual Societies.
London: Palgrave
Macmillan.
689–711.Google Scholar
van
Kampen, N. G.
1992. Stochastic Processes in Physics and
Chemistry. Amsterdam:
Elsevier.Google Scholar
Vazquez, F.,
Castelld, X., and
San Miguel, M.. 2010.
‘Agent Based Models of Language Competition: Macroscopic
Descriptions and Order-disorder Transitions’. Journal of
Statistical Mechanics
P04007.Google Scholar
Villalobos, F., and
Rangel, T. F.. 2014.
Geographic Patterns of Biodiversity.
Cd. de Mdxico: EditoraC3
CopIt-arXives. Page 1.Google Scholar
Vogt, P.
2009. ‘Modeling Interactions between
Language Evolution and Demography’.
Human Biology
81 (3):
237–258.Google Scholar
Wang, W.
S-Y., and
Minett, J. W.. 2005.
‘The Invasion of Language: Emergence, Change
and Death’. TRENDS in Ecology and
Evolution
20: 263.Google Scholar
Watts, D.
J., and Strogatz, S.
H.. 1998.
‘Collective Dynamics of
“Small-world" Networks.
Nature
393 (6684):
440.Google Scholar
Wendel, J.
2005. ‘Notes on the Ecology of
Language’. Bunkyo Gakuin University
Academic Journal
5:
51–76.Google Scholar
Wichmann, S.
2005. ‘On the Power-law Distribution
of Language Family Sizes’. Journal of
Linguistics
41 (1):
117–131.Google Scholar
Wichmann, S.
2008a. ‘The Emerging Field of
Language Dynamics’. Language and
Linguistics Compass
2 (3):
442–455.Google Scholar
Wichmann, S.
2008b. ‘Teaching & Learning
Guide for: The Emerging Field of Language
Dynamics’. Language and Linguistics
Compass
2 (6):
1294–1297.Google Scholar
Wichmann, S.,
Holman, E. W.,
Bakker, D., and Cecil
Brown, H.. 2010.
‘Evaluating Linguistic Distance
Measures’. Physica A
389 (17):
3632–3639.Google Scholar
Wyburn, J., and
Hayward, J.. 2008.
‘The Future of Bilingualism: An Application of
the Baggs and Freedman Model’.
Journal of Mathematical Society
32 (4):
267–284.Google Scholar
Wyburn, J., and
Hayward, J.. 2009.
‘OR and Language Planning: Modeling the
Interaction between Unilingual and Bilingual
Populations’. Journal of Operation
Research Society
60 (5):
626–636.Google Scholar
Wyburn, J., and
Hayward, J.. 2010.
‘A Model of Language-Group Interaction and
Evolution Including Language Acquisition
Planning’. Journal of Mathematical
Sociology
34 (3):
167–200.Google Scholar
Xia, Simon
H.,
Greenhill, J.,
Cardillo, Marcel, Hilde Schneemann, and
Lindell Bromham. 2019. ‘The
Ecological Drivers of Variation in Global Language
Diversity’. Nature
Communications
10 (1):
2047.Google Scholar
Young, D., and
Bettinger, R.. 1992.
‘The Numic Spread: A Computer
Simulation’. American
Antiquity
57 (1):
85–99.Google Scholar