Part III - Linguistics and Other Sciences
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 October 2018
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences , pp. 267 - 362Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Adams, Colin. 2004. The Knot Book: An Elementary Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Knots. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Agol, Ian, Hass, Joel, and Thurston, William. 2002. “3-manifold knot genus is NP-complete,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. New York: ACM Press, pp. 761–766.Google Scholar
Agol, Ian, Hass, Joel, and Thurston, William. 2005. “The computational complexity of knot genus and spanning area,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 358: 3821–3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alle, Henrik and Geiger, Jörg R. P. 2006. “Combined analog and action potential coding in hippocampal mossy fibers,” Science 311: 1290–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, Sanjeev and Barak, Boaz. 2009. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 2007. Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, Paul. 2007. Cave Art: A Guide to the Decorated Ice Age Caves of Europe. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.Google Scholar
Balari, Sergio, Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Camps, Marta, Longa, Víctor M., and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2012. “Knots, language, and computation: A bizarre love triangle? Replies to objections,” Biolinguistics 6/1: 79–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balari, Sergio, Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Camps, Marta, Longa, Víctor M., Lorenzo, Guillermo, and Uriagereka, Juan. 2011. “The archaeological record speaks: Bridging anthropology and linguistics,” International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, volume 2011 (Special Issue: Key Evolutionary Transformations in Homo Sapiens), Article ID 382679, 17 pages, doi: 10.4061/2011/382679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2009. “Computational phenotypes: Where the theory of computation meets Evo-Devo,” Biolinguistics 3: 2–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2013. Computational Phenotypes: Towards an Evolutionary Developmental Biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balari, Sergio and Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2015. “It is an organ, it is new, but it is not a new organ: Conceptualizing language from a homological perspective,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 3: 58, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2015.00058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbín Behrmann, Rodrigo and Moure Romanillo, Javier A. 1981. “Pinturas y grabados de la cueva de Tito Bustillo (Asturias): Conjuntos II al VII,” Boletín del Seminario de Estudios de Arte y Arqueología 47: 5–43.Google Scholar
Barrière, Claude. 1980. “Le Grand Plafond de Rouffignac,” Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 77/9: 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrière, Claude and Sahly, A. 1964. “Les empreintes humaines de Lascaux,” Miscelanea en Homenaje al Abate Henri Breuil, vol. I. Barcelona: Diputación Provincial, Instituto de Prehistoria y Arqueología, pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
Bednarik, Robert. 1986. “Cave use by Australian Pleistocene man,” Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeology Society 17/3: 227–245.Google Scholar
Bednarik, Robert. 2008. “Beads and cognitive evolution,” Time and Mind: The Journal of Archaeology, Consciousness and Culture 1/3: 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio and Boeckx, Cedric. 2014. “Universal Grammar and biological variation: An EvoDevo agenda for comparative biolinguistics,” Biological Theory 9: 122–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, Longa, Víctor M., Lorenzo, Guillermo, and Uriagereka, Juan. 2008. “Also sprach Neanderthalis … or did she?” Biolinguistics 2/2–3: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert, Beckers, Gabriël J., Okanoya, Kazuo, and Bolhius, Johan J. 2012. “A bird's eye view of human language evolution,” Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4: 5, doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, Robert, Okanoya, Kazuo, Beckers, Gabriël J., and Bolhius, Johan J. 2011. “Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 113–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biederman, Irving. 1987. “Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding,” Psychological Review 94: 115–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeckx, Cedric. 2013. “Biolinguistics: Forays into human cognitive biology,” Journal of Anthropological Sciences 91: 1–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, Johan J., Okanoya, Kazuo, and Scharff, Constance. 2010. “Twitter evolution: Converging mechanisms in birdsong and speech,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, Rudolf. 2010. “On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behavior,” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 20/3: 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, Marta and Uriagereka, Juan. 2006. “The Gordian Knot of linguistic fossils,” in Roselló, Joana and Martín, Jesús (eds.), The Biolinguistic Turn: Issues on Language and Biology. Barcelona: PPU, pp. 34–65.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto. 2013. “Knowledge of knots: Shapes in action,” in Kutz, Oliver, Bhatt, Mehul, Borgo, Stefano, and Santos, Paulo (eds.), Shapes 2.0: The Shape of Things: Workshop Held at the World Congress and School of Universal Logic. Rio de Janeiro, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Casati, Roberto and Varzi, Achille C. 1999. Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Castaño, José M. 2004. “Global indexed languages,” Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsiang-Chun, Chen, Hung-Yi, Tsai, Chia-Liang, Chen, Yung-Jung, and Cherng, Rong-Ju. 2009. “Comorbidity of motor and language impairments in preschool children in Taiwan,” Research in Developmental Disabilities 30: 1054–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1956. “On the limits of finite-state description,” Quarterly Progress Report 48: 116–118.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “On certain formal properties of grammars,” Information and Control 2: 137–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1963. “Formal properties of grammars,” in Luce, Robert Dunca, Bush, Robert B., and Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II. New York: John Wiley, pp. 323–418.Google Scholar
Collias, Nicholas E. and Collias, Elsie C. 1962. “An experimental study of the mechanisms of nest building in a weaverbird,” The Auk 79: 568–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delluc, Brigitte and Delluc, Gilles. 1979. “L'accès aux parois,” in Arlette Leroi-Gourhan and Jacques Allain (eds.), Lascaux inconnu. Paris: CNRS, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
d'Errico, Francesco, Henshilwood, Christopher, Vanhaeren, Marian, and van Niekerk, Karen. 2005. “Nassarius kraissianus shell beads from Blombos cave: Evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age,” Journal of Human Evolution 48: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desdemaines-Hugon, Christine. 2010. Stepping-Stones: A Journey through the Ice Age Caves of the Dordogne. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Duffy, Joseph R. 2005. Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis, and Management. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby.Google Scholar
Eden, Guinevere F., Wood, Frank B., and Stein, John F. 2003. “Clock drawing in developmental dyslexia,” Journal of Learning Disabilities 36: 216–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enard, Wolfgang, Przeworki, Molly, Fischer, Simon E., Lai, , Cecilia, S. L., Wiebe, Victor, Kitano, Takashi, Monaco, Anthony P., and Pääbo, Svante. 2002. “Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language,” Nature 418: 868–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fung, Victor S., Morris, John G., Leicester, Jonathan, Soo, Y. S., and Davies, Llewelyn. 1997. “Clonic perseveration following thalamofrontal disconnection: A distinctive movement disorder,” Movement Disorders 12: 378–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González Sáinz, César, Cacho Toca, Roberto, and Fukazawa, Takeo. 2003. Arte Paleolítico en la region cantábrica. Santander: Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Grossman, Murray G., Carvell, S., Gollomp, S., Stern, M. B., Vernon, G., and Hurtig, H. I. 1991. “Sentence comprehension and praxis deficits in Parkinson's disease,” Neurology 41: 1620–1628.Google ScholarPubMed
Gusella, James F. and MacDonald, Marcy E. 2006. “Huntington's disease: Seeing the pathogenic process through a genetic lens,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 31: 533–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansell, Mike H. 2000. Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, Joel, Lagarias, Jeffrey C., and Pippenger, Nicholas. 1999. “The computational complexity of knots and link problems,” Journal of the ACM 46: 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. “The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?” Science 298: 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, Jeffrey and Idsardi, William. 2011. “Sentence and word complexity,” Science 333: 295–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, Jeffrey and Idsardi, William. 2013. “What complexity differences reveal about domains in language,” Topics in Cognitive Sciences 5: 111–131, doi: 10.1111/tops.12000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henshilwood, Christopher S., d'Errico, Francesco, Yates, Royden, Jacobs, Zenobia, Tribolo, Chantal, Duller, Geoff A.T., Mercier, Norbert, Sealy, Judith C., Valladas, Helene, Watts, Ian, and Wintle, Ann G. 2002. “Emergence of modern human behaviour: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa,” Science 295: 1278–1280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopcroft, John and Ullman, Jeffrey D. 1979. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hudson, Kerry D. and Farran, Emily K. 2010. “Drawing the line: Drawing and construction strategies for simple and complex figures in Williams syndrome and typical development,” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29: 687–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, Jana M. and Braddock, Barbara A. 2011. “Gesture and motor skill in relation to language in children with language impairment,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54: 72–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, Colin. 1994. The Cambridge Illustrated History of France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Aravind K. 1985. “Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?,” in David Dowty and Lauri Kartunen (eds.), Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, Aravind K., Vijay-Shanker, K., and Weir, David. 1991. “The convergence of mildly context-sensitive grammar formalisms,” in Peter Shells, Stuart M. Shieber, and Thomas Wasow (eds.), Foundational Issues of Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 31–81.Google Scholar
Kallmeyer, Laura. 2013. “Linear context-free rewriting systems,” Language and Linguistics Compass 7/1: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 2006. “Williams Syndrome,” in Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 13. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Johannes, Lalueza-Fox, Carles, Orlando, Ludovic, Enard, Wolfgang, Green, Richard E., Burbano, Hernán A., Hublin, Jean-Jacques, Hänni, Catherine, Fortea, Javier, de la Rasilla, Marco, Bertranpetit, Jaume, Rosas, Antonio, and Pääbo, Svante. 2007. “The derived Foxp2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals,” Current Biology 17: 1908–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, Zing-Yang. 1967. The Dynamics of Behavior Development: An Epigenetic View. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, Greg. 2011. “Knottedness is in NP, modulo GRH.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.0845 (4 February 2012).Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourham, Arlette. 1982. “The archaeology of Lascaux Cave,” Scientific American 246: 80–88.Google Scholar
Lewis, Harry R. and Papadimitriou, Christos H. 1981. Elements of the Theory of Computation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lipowska, Malgorzata, Czaplewska, Ewa, and Wysocka, Anna. 2011. “Visuospatial deficits of dyslexic children,” Medical Science Monitor 17: CR216–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lister, Adrian and Bahn, Paul. 1994. Mammoths: Giants of the Ice Age. 3rd edn. London: Frances Lincoln Ltd.Google Scholar
Lobina, David J. and Brenchley, Mark. 2012. “Language, knots and computation: More Bermuda than love,” Biolinguistics 6/2: 176–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longa, Víctor M. 2013. “Un análisis computacional de las líneas prehistóricas: Diseños geométricos y lenguaje,” Zephyrus. Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología 71: 15–43.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, Guillermo. 2012. “The evolution of the faculty of language,” in Boeckx, Cedric, Horno, María del Carmen, and Mendívil, José Luis (eds.), Language, from a Biological Point of View. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Publishing, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
Mauriac, Muriel. 2011. “Lascaux: The history of the discovery of an outstanding decorated cave,” Adoranten. Journal of the Scandinavian Society for Prehistoric Art, vol. 2011, 5–25.Google Scholar
Michel, George F. and Harkins, Debra A. 1985. “Concordance of handedness between teacher and student facilitates learning manual skills,” Journal of Human Evolution 14: 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, Alessandro. 2011. “A principle of developmental inertia,” in Hallgrímsson, Benedikt and Hall, Brian K. (eds.), Epigenetics: Linking Genotype and Phenotype in Development and Evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 116–133.Google Scholar
Montes Barquín, Ramón. 2003. “El conjunto rupestre paleolítico de la cueva de El Pendo (Escobedo de Camargo),” in Carmelo Fernández Ibáñez and Jesús Cobo, Ruiz (eds.), La arqueología de la Bahía de Santander, Vol. I. Santander: Fundación Marcelino Botín, pp. 227–249.Google Scholar
Montes Barquín, Ramón, Sanguino González, Juan, Gómez Laguna, Antonio J., and Luque, Carlos G. 1998. “New Palaeolithic cave art in Cueva de El Pendo, Cantabria region, Spain,” Rock Art Research 15/2: 89–97.Google Scholar
Moure Romanillo, Alfonso and González Morales, Manuel R. 1988. “El contexto del arte parietal: La tecnología de los artistas en la cueva de Tito Bustillo (Asturias),” Trabajos de Prehistoria 45: 19–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Laura L. 2000. “Spoken language production in Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 43: 1350–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papadimitriou, Christos H. 1994. Computational Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, Massimo and Uriagereka, Juan. 2005. “The evolution of the narrow faculty of language,” Lingue e Linguaggio 4/1: 27–79.Google Scholar
Pignocchi, Alessandro. 2010. “How the intentions of the draftsman shape perception of a drawing,” Consciousness and Cognition 19/4: 887–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polledo González, Miguel. 2011. El arte paleolítico de Tito Bustillo. Cazadores y artistas en la cueva del Pozu'l Ramu. Pola de Siero, Asturias: Ménsula Ediciones.Google Scholar
Rechetnikov, Rouslan P. and Maitra, Kinsuk. 2009. “Motor impairments in children associated with impairments of speech or language: A meta-analytic review of research literature,” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 63: 255–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarpeshkar, Rahul. 1998. “Analog versus digital: Extrapolating from electronics to neurobiology,” Neural Computation 10: 1601–1638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarpeshkar, Rahul 2009. “Neuromorphic and biomorphic engineering systems,” in McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology 2009. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 250–252.Google Scholar
Saura, Pedro and Múzquiz, Matilde. 2007. Arte Paleolítico de Asturias: Ocho santuarios subterráneos. Oviedo: Cajastur.Google Scholar
Shriberg, Lawrence D., Ballard, Kirrie J., Tomblin, J., Bruce, Duffy, Joseph, R., Odell, Katharine H., and Williams, Charles A. 2006. “Speech, prosody, and voice characteristics of a mother and daughter with a 7,13 translocation affecting FOXP2,” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49: 500–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shu, Yousheng, Hasenstaub, Andrea, Duque, Álvaro, Yo, Yuguo, and McCormick, David. 2006. “Modulation of intracortical synaptic potentials by presynaptic somatic membrane potential,” Nature 441: 761–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shubin, Nei, Tabin, Cliff, and Carroll, Sean. 2009. “Deep homology and the origins of novelty,” Nature 457: 818–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. 1983. “Color encoding sequences and the pursuit of meaning on the Great Mural rock art of Baja California,” in Hedges, Ken (ed.), Rock Art Papers. San Diego: San Diego Museum Papers 16, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
Soffer, Olga, Adovasio, James M., and Hyland, D. C. 2000. “The ‘Venus’ figurines: Textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the Upper Paleolithic,” Current Anthropology 41: 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Joseph, Flanders, Adam, Madi, Saussan, Laskas, Joseph, Stoddard, Eve, Pyrros, Ayis, Natale, Peter, and DelVecchio, Nicole. 2003. “Regional brain activation associated with different performance patterns during learning of a complex motor skill,” Cerebral Cortex 13: 904–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troyer, Angela K., Black, Sandra E., Armilio, Maria L., and Moscovitch, Morris. 2004. “Cognitive and motor functioning in a patient with selective infarction of the left basal ganglia: Evidence for decreased non-routine response selection and performance,” Neuropsychologia 42: 902–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turing, Alan M. 1954. “Solvable and unsolvable problems,” in Copeland, Jack (ed.), The Essential Turing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 576–595.Google Scholar
Tyldesley, Joyce A. and Bahn, Paul G. 1983. “Use of plants in the European Palaeolithic: A review of the evidence,” Quaternary Science Reviews 2: 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2008. “Desperately evolving syntax,” in Smith, Andrew, Smith, Kenny, and Cancho, Ramon Ferrer i (eds.), The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (EVOLANG7). Singapore: World Scientific Press, pp. 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhaeren, Marian, d'Errico, Francesco, Stringer, Chris, James, Sarah L., Todd, Jonathan A., and Mienis, Henk K. 2006. “Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria,” Science 312: 1785–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargha-Khadem, Faraneh, Gadian, David G., Copp, Andrew, and Mishkin, Mortimer. 2005. “FOXP2 and the neuroanatomy of speech and language,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 131–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vijay-Shanker, K. and Weir, David. 1994. “The equivalence of four extensions of context-free grammars,” Mathematical Systems Theory 27: 511–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, Adam Brooks. 2008. Formal Language: A Practical Introduction. Wilsonville, OR: Franklin, Beedle & Associates.Google Scholar
Webster, Richard I., Majnemer, Annette, Platt, Robert W., and Shevell, Michael I. 2005. “Motor function at school age in children with a preschool diagnosis of developmental language impairment,” Journal of Pediatrics 146: 80–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zilhão, João, Angelucci, Diego E., Badal-García, Ernestina, d'Errico, Francesco, Daniel, Floréal, Dayet, Laure, Douka, Katerina, Higham, Thomas F. G., Martínez-Sánchez, María José, Montes-Bernárdez, Ricardo, Murcia-Mascarós, Sonia, Pérez-Sirvent, Carmen, Roldán-García, Clodoaldo, Vanhaeren, Marian, Villaverde, Valentín, Wood, Rachel, and Zapata, Josefina. 2010. “Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107/3: 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zylberberg, Ariel, Dehaene, Stanislas, Roelfsema, Pieter R., and Sigman, Mariano. 2011. “The human Turing machine: A neural framework for mental programs,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15: 293–300.Google Scholar
References
Alamri, Saleh. 2017. The hippocampal contribution to language processing. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Antzoulatos, Evan G., and Earl, K. Miller. 2014. Increases in functional connectivity between prefrontal cortex and striatum during category learning. Neuron 83: 216–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balsters, J. H., Cussans, E., Diedrichsen, J., Phillips, K. A., Preuss, T. M., Rilling, J. K., and Ramnani, N.. 2010. Evolution of the cerebellar cortex: The selective expansion of prefrontal-projecting cerebellar lobules. NeuroImage 49(3): 2045–2052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, Robert A., and Chris, Venditti. 2014. Rapid evolution of the cerebellum in humans and other great apes. Current Biology 24: 2440–2444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basar, Erol, and Bahar, Guntekin. 2013. Review of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma response oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical Neurophysiology 62: 303–341.Google ScholarPubMed
Bastiaansen, Marcel, and Peter, Hagoort. 2015. Frequency-based segregation of syntactic and semantic unification during online sentence level language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(11): 2095–2107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastos, Andre M., Martin, W. Usrey, Rick, A. Adams, George, R. Mangun, Pascal, Fries, and Karl, J. Friston. 2012. Canonical microcircuits for predictive coding. Neuron 76: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastos, Andre M., Julien, Vezoli, and Pascal, Fries. 2015. Communication through coherence with inter-areal delays. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 173–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., and Schacter, D. L. 2015. Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(2): 87–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-Burraco, Antonio, and Cedric, Boeckx. 2014. Trastornos del lenguaje como oscilopatías. Revista de Neurología 59: 333–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, I., Balewski, Z., Mahowald, K., and Fedorenko, E. 2016. Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. NeuroImage 127: 307–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeckx, Cedric. 2009. The nature of Merge: Consequences for language, mind, and biology. In Of Minds and Language: The Basque Country Encounter with Noam Chomsky, ed. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., Uriagereka, J., and Salaburu, P., pp. 44–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2013. Merge: Biolinguistic considerations. English Linguistics 30(2): 463–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2014. Elementary Syntactic Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, and Antonio, Benítez-Burraco. 2014. The shape of the human language-ready brain. Frontiers in Psychology 5(282): 282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeckx, Cedric, Anna, Martínez-Alvarez, and Evelina, Leivada. 2014. The functional neuroanatomy of serial order in language. Journal of Neurolinguistics 32: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollimunta, Anil, Jue, Mo, Charles, E. Schroeder, and Mingzhou, Ding. 2011. Neuronal mechanisms and attentional modulation of corticothalamic alpha oscillations. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 4935–4943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonhage, Corinna E., Mueller, J. L., Friederici, A. D., and Fiebach, C. J.. 2015. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension. Cortex 68: 33–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense (2 vols.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, and Matthias, Schlesewsky. 2013. Reconciling time, space and function: A new dorsal–ventral stream model of sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 125: 60–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina, Matthias, Schlesewsky, Steven, L. Small, and Josef, P. Rauschecker. 2015. Neurobiological roots of language in primate audition: Common computational properties. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 142–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosman, Conrado A., Carien, S. Lansink, and Cyriel, Pennartz. 2014. Functions of gamma-band synchronization in cognition: From single circuits to functional diversity across cortical and subcortical systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 39: 1982–1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, Jonathan, Yuval, Nir, Uri, Hasson, Rafael, Malach, David, J. Heeger, and Liina, Pylkkänen. 2012. Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain and Language 120: 163–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, Randy L., and Fenna, M. Krienen. 2013. The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 648–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, Randy L., Jessica, R. Andrews-Hanna, and Daniel, L. Schacter. 2008. The brain's default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzsaki, György. 2010. Neural syntax: Cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers. Neuron 68: 362–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzsaki, György, Nikos, Logothetis, and Wolf, Singer. 2013. Scaling brain size, keeping timing: Evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. Neuron 80: 751–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzsaki, György, and Brendon, O Watson. 2012. Brain rhythms and neural syntax: Implications for efficient coding of cognitive content and neuropsychiatric disease. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 14: 345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canolty, R. T., Ganguly, K., Kennerley, S. W., Cadieu, C. F., Koepsell, K., Wallis, J. D., and Carmena, J. M.. 2010. Oscillatory phase coupling coordinates anatomically dispersed functional cell assemblies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 17356–17361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, Jason L., Michael, J. Koval, Thilo, Womelsdorf, Stephen, G. Lomber, and Stefan, Everling. 2014. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex deactivation in monkeys reduces preparatory beta and gamma power in the superior colliculus. Cerebral Cortex 25(12): 4704–4714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., and Huang, X.. 2016. Modulation of alpha and beta oscillations during an n-back task with varying temporal memory load. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 2031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Martin, R., Michaels, D., and Uriagereka, J., pp. 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. Kenstowicz, M., pp. 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistics, ed. Otero, C., Freidin, R., and Zubizarreta, M.-L., pp. 133–166. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Morris, Halle, and Fred, Lukoff. 1956. On accent and juncture in English. In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2005. Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The ‘neuronal recycling’ hypothesis. In From Monkey Brain to Human Brain, ed. Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M., and Rizzolatti, J., pp. 133–157. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Michel, Kerszberg, and Jean-Pierre, Changeux. 1998. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 14529–14534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deisseroth, K., Mermelstein, P. G., Xia, H., and Tsien, R. W.. 2003. Signaling from synapse to nucleus: The logic behind the mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13(3): 354–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Pasquale, Francesco, Della Penna, Stefania, Snyder, Abraham Z., Marzetti, Laura, Pizzella, Vittorio, Romani, Gian Luca, and Corbetta, Maurizio. 2012. A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 74: 753–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X., and Poeppel, D.. 2015. Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience 19(1): 158–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dipoppa, Mario, and Gutkin, Boris S.. 2013. Flexible frequency control of cortical oscillations enables computations required for working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 12828–12833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, John. 2010. The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 172–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, John. 2013. The structure of cognition: Attentional episodes in mind and brain. Neuron 80: 35–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, Andreas K., and Pascal, Fries. 2010. Beta-band oscillations: Signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20: 156–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedorenko, Evelina, and Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.. 2014. Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18: 120–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitch, W. Tecumseh, and Martins, Mauricio D.. 2014. Hierarchical processing in music, language, and action: Lashley revisited. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1316: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flinker, A., Korzeniewska, A., Shestyuk, A. Y., Franaszczuk, P. J., Dronkers, N. F., Knight, R. T., and Crone, N. E.. 2015. Redefining the role of Broca's area in speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(9): 2871–2875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. 2006. What's in control of language? Nature Neuroscience 9: 991–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D. 2009. Brain circuits of syntax. In Biological Foundations and Origin of Syntax. Strüngmann Forum Reports (Vol. 3), pp. 239–252. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D., and Gierhan, Sarah M. E.. 2013. The language network. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 23: 250–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, Angela D., and Wolf, Singer. 2015. Grounding language processing on basic neurophysiological principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, P. 2015. Rhythms for cognition: Communication through coherence. Neuron 88(1): 220–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallistel, C. R., and King, A. P.. 2009. Memory and the Computational Brain. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genovesio, Aldo, Wise, Steven P., and Passingham, Richard E.. 2014. Prefrontal–parietal function: From foraging to foresight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18: 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giraud, Anne-Lise, and David, Poeppel. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience 15: 511–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goucha, Tomás, and Friederici, Angela D.. 2015. The language skeleton after dissecting meaning: A functional segregation within Broca's area. NeuroImage 114: 294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, Peter. 2005. On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 416–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasson, U., Chen, J., and Honey, C. J.. 2015. Hierarchical process memory: Memory as an integral component of information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19: 304–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickok, G. 2012. Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13(2): 135. doi: 10.1038/nrn3158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himberg, T., Hirvenkari, L., Mandel, A., and Hari, R.. 2015. Word-by-word entrainment of speech rhythm during joint story building. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honkanen, Roosa, Rouhinen, Santeri, Wang, Sheng H., Palva, J. Matias, and Palva, Satu. 2014. Gamma oscillations underlie the maintenance of feature-specific information and the contents of visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex 25(10): 3788–3801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyafil, Alexandre, Fontolan, Lorenzo, Kabdebon, Claire, Gutkin, Boris, and Giraud, Anne-Lise. 2015. Speech encoding by coupled cortical theta and gamma oscillations. eLife 4.Google ScholarPubMed
Ito, M. 2008. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9(4): 304–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeon, Hyeon-Ae, Anwander, Alfred, and Friederici, Angela D.. 2014. Functional network mirrored in the prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, and thalamus: High-resolution functional imaging and structural connectivity. The Journal of Neuroscience 34: 9202–9212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimesch, Wolfgang. 2012. Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16: 606–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopell, N. J., Gritton, H. J., Whittington, M. A., and Kramer, M. A.. 2014. Beyond the connectome: The dynome. Neuron 83(6): 1319–1328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotz, Sonja A., and Schwartze, Michael. 2010. Cortical speech processing un-plugged: A timely subcortico-cortical framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 392–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, N. H. L., Schoffelen, J.-M., Udden, J., Hulten, A., and Hagoort, P.. 2016. Neural activity during sentence processing as reflected in theta, alpha, beta and gamma oscillations. NeuroImage 142(15): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, Ayelet Nina, Schreyer, Helene Marianne, van Pelt, Stan, and Fries, Pascal. 2015. Distributed attention is implemented through theta-rhythmic gamma modulation. Current Biology 25(17): 2332–2337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lau, Ellen. 2015. Commentary at http://facultyoflanguage.blogspot.com.es/2015/11/poeppel-on-brains.html.Google Scholar
Leventhal, Daniel K., Gage, Gregory J., Schmidt, Robert, Pettibone, Jeffrey R., Case, Alaina C., and Berke, Joshua D.. 2012. Basal ganglia beta oscillations accompany cue utilization. Neuron 73: 523–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisman, John. 2005. The theta/gamma discrete phase code occurring during the hippocampal phase precession may be a more general brain coding scheme. Hippocampus 15: 913–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisman, John. 2015. The challenge of understanding the brain: Where we stand in 2015. Neuron 86: 864–882.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marantz, Alec. 2008. Words and phases. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, ed. Choe, S.-H., pp. 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Marcus, G. 2014. The computational brain. In The Future of the Brain, ed. Marcus, G. and Freeman, W., pp. 205–215. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrea E., and Doumas, Leonida A. A.. 2017. A mechanism for the cortical computation of hierarchical linguistic structure. PLoS Biology 15(3): e2000663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, Claire, and Ravel, Nadine. 2014. Beta and gamma oscillatory activities associated with olfactory memory tasks: Different rhythms for different functional networks? Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez, Antígona, Gaspar, Pablo A., Hillyard, Steven A., Bickel, Stephan, Lakatos, Peter, Dias, Elisa C., and Javitt, Daniel C.. 2015. Neural oscillatory deficits in schizophrenia predict behavioral and neurocognitive impairments. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micheli, C., Kaping, D., Westendorff, S., Valiante, T. A., and Womelsdorf, T.. 2015. Inferior-frontal cortex phase synchronizes with the temporal–parietal junction prior to successful change detection. NeuroImage 119: 417–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirman, Daniel, Chen, Qi, Zhang, Yongsheng, Wang, Ze, Faseyitan, Olufunsho K., Coslett, H. Branch, and Schwartz, Myrna F.. 2015. Neural organization of spoken language revealed by lesion–symptom mapping. Nature Communications 6 (April 16, 2015): 7762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohta, Shinri, Fukui, Naoki, and Sakai, Kuniyoshi. 2013. Syntactic computation in the human brain: The degree of merger as a key factor. PloS One 8: e56230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallier, Christophe, Devauchelle, Anne-Dominique, and Dehaene, Stanislas. 2011. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2522–2527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palva, Satu, and Palva, J. Matias. 2011. Functional roles of alpha-band phase synchronization in local and large-scale cortical networks. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, Carolyn, and Wheatley, Thalia. 2013. Old cortex, new contexts: Re-purposing spatial perception for social cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, Eiluned, Stringer, Chris, and Dunbar, Robin I. M.. 2013. New insights into differences in brain organization between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 280: 20130168.Google Scholar
Peiker, I., David, N., Schneider, T. R., Nolte, G., Schottle, D., and Engel, A. K.. 2015. Perceptual integration deficits in autism spectrum disorders are associated with reduced interhemispheric gamma-band coherence. Journal of Neuroscience 35(50): 16352–16361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeppel, David. 2005. The Interdisciplinary Study of Language and Its Challenges. Technical report, Jahrbuch des Wissenschaftskollegs zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Poeppel, David. 2012. The maps problem and the mapping problem: Two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 29(1/2): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poeppel, David. 2014. The neuroanatomic and neurophysiological infrastructure for speech and language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 28: 142–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raichle, Marcus E., MacLeod, Ann Mary, Snyder, Abraham Z., Powers, William J., Gusnard, Debra A., and Shulman, Gordon L.. 2001. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 676–682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, J., Theofanopoulou, C., and Boeckx, C.. 2015. A hypothesis concerning the neurobiological basis of phrase structure building. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Riecke, L., Sack, A. T., and Schroeder, C. E.. 2015. Endogenous delta/theta sound-brain phase entrainment accelerates the buildup of auditory streaming. Current Biology 25(24): 3196–3201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivolta, Davide, Heidegger, Tonio, Scheller, Bertram, Sauer, Andreas, Schaum, Michael, Birkner, Katharina, Singer, Wolf, Wibral, Michael, and Uhlhaas, Peter J.. 2015. Ketamine dysregulates the amplitude and connectivity of high-frequency oscillations in cortical–subcortical networks in humans: Evidence from resting-state magnetoencephalography-recordings. Schizophrenia Bulletin 41: 1105–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roehm, D., Klimesch, W., Haider, H., and Doppelmayr, M.. 2001. The role of theta and alpha oscillations for language comprehension in the human electroencephalogram. Neuroscience Letters 310(2/3): 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roehm, D., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., Frisch, S., and Haider, H.. 2004. Fractionating language comprehension via frequency characteristics of the human EEG. Neuroreport 15(3): 409–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romei, V., Bauer, M., Brooks, J. L., Economides, M., Penny, W., Thut, G., Driver, J., and Bestmann, S.. 2016. Causal evidence that intrinsic beta-frequency is relevant for enhanced signal propagation in the motor system as shown through rhythmic TMS. NeuroImage 126: 120–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, Frédéric, and Uhlhaas, Peter J.. 2014. Working memory and neural oscillations: Alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct wm information? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18: 16–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, Frédéric, Wibral, Michael, Singer, Wolf, Aru, Jaan, and Uhlhaas, Peter J.. 2013. The phase of thalamic alpha activity modulates cortical gamma-band activity: Evidence from resting-state MEG recordings. The Journal of Neuroscience 33: 17827–17835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Rachael D., Watson, Patrick D., Duff, Melissa C., and Cohen, Neal J.. 2014. The role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saalmann, Yuri B, and Kastner, Sabine. 2011. Cognitive and perceptual functions of the visual thalamus. Neuron 71: 209–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saalmann, Yuri B., Pinsk, Mark A., Wang, Liang, Li, Xin, and Kastner, Sabine. 2012. The pulvinar regulates information transmission between cortical areas based on attention demands. Science 337: 753–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salami, Mahmoud, Itami, Chiaki, Tsumoto, Tadaharu, and Kimura, Fumitaka. 2003. Change of conduction velocity by regional myelination yields constant latency irrespective of distance between thalamus and cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 6174–6179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuels, B. 2011. Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, Simon, Koenig, Thomas, Morishima, Yosuke, Dierks, Thomas, Federspiel, Andrea, and Jann, Kay. 2015. Discovering frequency sensitive thalamic nuclei from EEG microstate informed resting state fMRI. NeuroImage 118: 368–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shanahan, M. 2012. The brain's connective core and its role in animal cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 2704–2714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, J. S. 2015. Sound perception: Rhythmic brain activity really is important for auditory segregation. Current Biology 25(24): R1173–R1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, Kun, Meng, Ming, Chen, Lin, Zhou, Ke, and Luo, Huan. 2014. Behavioral oscillations in attention: Rhythmic α pulses mediated through θ band. The Journal of Neuroscience 34: 4837–4844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth. 2003. What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In Language and Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought, ed. Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S., pp. 277–311. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, Elizabeth, and Kinzler, Katherine D.. 2007. Core knowledge. Developmental Science 10: 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, A., Kotz, S. A., Scharinger, M., and Obleser, J.. 2014. Alpha and theta brain oscillations index dissociable processes in spoken word recognition. NeuroImage 97: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teichmann, M., Rosso, C., Martini, J. B., Bloch, I., Brugières, P., Duffau, H., Lehéricy, S., and Bachoud-Lévi, A. C.. 2015. A cortical-subcortical syntax pathway linking Broca's area and the striatum. Human Brain Mapping 36: 2270–2283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theofanopoulou, Constantina. 2015. Brain asymmetry in the white matter making and globularity. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01857.Google ScholarPubMed
Theofanopoulou, Constantina, and Boeckx, Cedric. 2016. The central role of the thalamus in language and cognition. In Advances in Biolinguistics, ed. Boeckx, C. and Fujita, K., pp. 230–255. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theyel, Brian B., Llano, Daniel A., and Sherman, S. Murray. 2010. The corti-cothalamocortical circuit drives higher-order cortex in the mouse. Nature Neuroscience 13: 84–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, ed. Epstein, S. D. and Hornstein, N., pp. 251–282. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 2012. Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vicente, Raul, Gollo, Leonardo L., Mirasso, Claudio R., Fischer, Ingo, and Pipa, Gordon. 2008. Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 17157–17162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voloh, Benjamin, Valiante, Taufik A., Everling, Stefan, and Womelsdorf, Thilo. 2015. Theta–gamma coordination between anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex indexes correct attention shifts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 112(27): 8457–8462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahl, Michael, Marzinzik, Frank, Friederici, Angela D., Hahne, Anja, Kupsch, Andreas, Schneider, Gerd-Helge, Saddy, Douglas, Curio, Gabriel, and Klostermann, Fabian. 2008. The human thalamus processes syntactic and semantic language violations. Neuron 59: 695–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, Brendon O., and Buzsaki, György. 2015. Neural syntax in mental disorders. Biological Psychiatry 77: 998–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, Sabine, and Mueller, Horst M.. 2012. ‘Too many betas do not spoil the broth’: The role of beta brain oscillations in language processing. Frontiers in Psychology 3(201): 201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerlund, Masha, and Pylkkänen, Liina. 2014. The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in semantic composition vs. semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 57: 59–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, B., Kikuchi, Y., Sun, L., Hunter, D., Dick, F., Smith, K., Thiele, A., Griffiths, T. D., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and Petkov, C. I.. 2015. Auditory sequence processing reveals evolutionarily conserved regions of frontal cortex in macaques and humans. Nature Communications 6: 8901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, Matthew A., Varela, Carmen, and Remondes, Miguel. 2015. Phase organization of network computations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 31: 250–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Womelsdorf, Thilo, Ardid, Salva, Everling, Stefan, and Valiante, Taufik A.. 2014. Burst firing synchronizes prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex during attentional control. Current Biology 24: 2613–2621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolgar, A., Afshar, S., Williams, M. A., and Rich, A. N.. 2015. Flexible coding of task rules in frontoparietal cortex: An adaptive system for flexible cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27(10): 1895–1911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuste, Rafael. 2015. From the neuron doctrine to neural networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16: 487–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Carr, J. (2006). Center manifold. Scholarpedia 1(12): 1826. DOI: 10.4249/scholarpedia.1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X. & Poeppel, D. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience 19: 158–164. DOI: 10.1038/nn.4186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958). The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R., Hibbs, A. & Styer, D. (2005). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hansel, D., Mato, G. & Meunier, C. (1995). Synchrony in excitatory neural networks. Neural Computation 7(2): 307–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haragus, M. & Iooss, G. (2011). Local Bifurcations, Center Manifolds, and Normal Forms in Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselblat, B. & Katok, A. (2003). Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koester, J. (1991). Voltage-gated ion channels and the generation of the action potential. In Kandel, E., Schwartz, J. & Jessell, T. (eds.), Principles of Neural Science, 3rd edn. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange, 104–118.Google Scholar
Krivochen, D. (2014). Language, chaos and entropy: A physical take on biolinguistics. Iberia: IJTL 6: 27–74.Google Scholar
Krivochen, D. (2015). On phrase structure building and labelling algorithms: Towards a non-uniform theory of syntactic structures. The Linguistic Review 32(3): 515–572.Google Scholar
Ladyman, J., Lambert, J. & Wiesner, K. (2012). What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3(1): 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H. & Kuppin, J. (1977). A restrictive theory of transformational grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 4: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrubia, S., Mikhailov, A. & Zanette, D. (2004). Emergence of Dynamical Order: Synchronization Phenomena in Complex Systems. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moessner, R. and Ramírez, A. (2006). Geometrical frustration. Physics Today (February): 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papo, D., Buldú, J., Boccaletti, S. & Bullmore, E. (2014). Complex network theory and the brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 (1653). DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramal, R., Toulouse, G. & Virasoro, M. (1986). Ultrametricity for physicists. Reviews of Modern Physics 58(3): 765–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral disseration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Saddy, D. & Krivochen, D. (2016). Emergent oscillations and cyclicity: Physical aspects of frustrated cognitive systems. Paper presented at first International Symposium on the Physics of Language. Sophia University, Tokyo. 4–5 March 2016.Google Scholar
Saddy, D. & Uriagereka, J. (2004). Measuring language. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 14(2): 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandamirskaya, Y., Zibner, S., Schneegans, S. & Schöner, G. (2013). Using Dynamic Field Theory to extend the embodiment stance toward higher cognition. New Ideas in Psychology 31(3): 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöner, G. (2009). Development as change of system dynamics: Stability, instability, and emergence. In Spencer, J. et al. (eds.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Considered. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0002.Google Scholar
Spencer, J., Perone, S. & Johnson, J. (2009). Dynamic Field Theory and embodied cognitive dynamics. In Spencer, J. et al. (eds.), Toward a Unified Theory of Development Connectionism and Dynamic System Theory Re-Considered. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300598.003.0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, D. & Newman, C. (2011). Spin glasses: Old and new complexity. Complex Systems 20: 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegmark, M. (2007). The Mathematical Universe. arXiv: 0704.0646v2. DOI: 10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2002a). Multiple Spell-Out. In Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London: Routledge, 45–65.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2002b). Warps: Some thoughts on categorization. In Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London: Routledge, 288–317.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2008). Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic Restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2012). Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2015). ‘Natural’ grammars and natural language. In Fernandez, B. & Salaburu, P. (eds.), Ibon Sarasola, Gorazarre. Bilbao: Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco, 6656–6674.Google Scholar
Villegas, P., Moretti, P. & Muñoz, M. A. (2014). Frustrated hierarchical synchronization and emergent complexity in the human connectome network. Nature, Scientific Reports 4, Article number: 5990. DOI: 10.1038/srep05990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeeman, C. (1977). Catastrophe Theory: Selected Papers 1972–1977. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
References
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. & Rosenbaum, P., eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham: Ginn, 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Di Domenico, E., Hamann, C. & Matteini, S., eds., Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti. Linguistics Today 223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/la.223.01cho.Google Scholar
Cipu, Mihai & Luca, Florian. 2001. On the Galois Group of the generalized Fibonacci polynomial. Analele. Ştiintifice ale. Universitatii Ovidius Constanţa 9(1): 27–38.Google Scholar
Escudero, Juan Garcia. 2003. Fibonacci sequences and the multiperiodicity of the variable star UW Herculis. Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (3) 3: 235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidin, R. and Vergnaud, J.-R. 2001. Exquisite connections: Some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory. Lingua 111: 639–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idsardi, W. J. & Uriagereka, J. (2009). Metrical combinatorics and the real half of the Fibonacci sequence. Biolinguistics 3(4): 404–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Medeiros, David P. 2008. Optimal growth in phrase structure. Biolinguistics 2: 152–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, David P. 2012. Economy of Command. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Moody, R. V., ed. 1997. The Mathematics of Long-range Aperiodic Order. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea. 2013. The Equilibrium of Human Syntax: Symmetries in the Brain. Abingdon and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J. 2008. Still a bridge too far? Biolinguistic questions for grounding language on brains. Physics of Life Reviews 5(4): 207–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2008.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Vitiello, G. 2015. Linguistics and Some Aspects of Its Underlying Dynamics. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Vitiello, G. 2017. Third factors in language design: Some suggestions from Quantum Field Theory. In McGilvray, J., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, 134–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prusinkiewicz, P., Lindenmayer, A. & Hanan, J. 1990. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, Grzegorz & Salomaa, Arto. 1980. The Mathematical Theory of L-systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6): 417–429. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00202.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1996. Warps: Some thoughts on categorization. In Ausin, A. & Lopez, E., eds., Cuadernos de Linguistica IV. Madrid: Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1998. Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Epstein, S. D. & Hornstein, N., eds., Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 251–282.Google Scholar
References
Albert, D. 2011. “Explaining it All: How We Became the Center of the Universe.” New York Times Sunday Book Review (of Deutsch 2011), Aug. 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. 1994. “Betty Crocker's Theory.” Review of John Searle, The Rediscovery of the Mind. London Review of Books 16(9).Google Scholar
Crick, F. 1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1838. Charles Darwin's Notebooks, 1836–1844: Geology, Transmutation of Species, Metaphysical Enquiries, 271. Available at: http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=image&itemID=CUL-DAR122.-&keywords=brain+the+of+secretion&pageseq=148Google Scholar
Gallistel, C. R. and King, A. P.. 2009. Memory and the Computational Brain. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huarte, J. 1575. Examen de ingenios para las ciencias (The Examination of Men's Wits) (London, 1594 facsimile ed.) (C. Camilli and R. C. Squire, trans). Amsterdam: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Janiak, A. 2008. Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyré, A. 1958. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, F. A. 1865. Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart. The History of Materialism (Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1925, translation of third expanded edition).Google Scholar
Machamer, P. (ed.). 1998. The Cambridge Companion to Galileo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMullin, E. 1978. Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. (ed.). 1965. Priestley's Writings on Philosophy, Science, and Politics. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thiel, U. 2011. The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virués Ortega, J. 2005. “Juan Huarte de San Juan in Cartesian and Modern Psycholinguistics: An Encounter with Noam Chomsky.” Psicothema 17(3): 436–440.Google Scholar
Yolton, J. 1984. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar