Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:16:35.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Generativity and Explanation in Semantics: A Reply to Fodor and Lepore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

James Pustejovsky
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Federica Busa
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

Abstract

In this article, I address the remarks made in Fodor and Lepore's article, “The Emptiness of the Lexicon: Critical Reflections on James Pustejovsky's The Generative Lexicon,” regarding the research program outlined in Pustejovsky (1995). My response focuses on two themes: Fodor and Lepore's misreadings and misinterpretations of the substance as well as the details of the theory, and the generally negative and unconstructive view of the study of semantics and natural language meaning inherent in their approach.

Methodological Preliminaries

I would like to address the remarks made in Fodor and Lepore's (henceforth, FL), “The Emptiness of the Lexicon: Critical Reflections on James Pustejovsky's The Generative Lexicon” (in this volume), regarding the research program outlined in Pustejovsky (1995). My response focuses on two themes: FL's misreadings and misinterpretations of the substance as well as the details of the book, and the generally misguided and unconstructive view of the study of semantics and natural language meaning inherent in their approach.

In contrast to this approach, I have proposed a framework, Generative Lexicon Theory, that faces the empirically hard problems of how words can have different meanings in different contexts, how new senses can emerge compositionally, and how semantic types predictably map to syntactic forms in language. The theory accomplishes this by means of a semantic typing system encoding generative factors, called “qualia structures,” into each lexical item. Operating over these structures are compositional rules incorporating specific devices for capturing the contextual determination of an expression's meaning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×