We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Explaining grammar as meaningful
In the previous chapter I presented linguistic studies that concentrated on the integration of syntax and conceptual semantics. Chomsky (1957) proposed several varieties of formal structure descriptions originally based on standard frameworks of traditional grammar. Jackendoff (1983) demonstrated that an appropriate integration of phonological, syntactic and semantic phenomena requires a reorganization, in which each of the different domains determines its own principles of formal structure description. We have seen that this insight led to three stages in which the domain’s structure descriptions were represented independently but systematically integrated by means of interface relations. The previous chapter finished with a radical revision: The foundations of different domains and their integration should no longer be represented as phenomena in the body external world, that is, the world of things. Instead the external world should be pushed into the mind/brain/body that organizes the ranges of internal feelings and externally oriented perception, action and objective thought.
The reader may ask why many modern schools of linguistics had widely accepted logical formats as guidelines for descriptive representations. He should recall that antiquity and the middle ages already understood grammar and logic as related disciplines. All other disciplines had to be understood in domain-appropriate conception frameworks following schematic knowledge of grammar and logic. Accounting for the enormous progress of mathematics and logic linguistics also aimed at correspondingly improved formats and theories that nevertheless should be adapted to the characteristics of natural languages. Without abandoning the formalist techniques, theoretical linguistics should clearly circumscribe and define the basic properties that distinguish ordinary language from other notational systems, say of computer science, the genetic code, the “language” of bees etc. or from other knowledge frames defined for the sciences physics, genetics, formal information theory, computer theory etc.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
