Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:41:00.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Language and Cognition

from Part One - Factors Influencing Language Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2022

James Law
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Sheena Reilly
Affiliation:
Griffith University, Queensland
Cristina McKean
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access

Summary

The development of language and cognition is key to human development. Language is an important means to communicate and code information; it is relevant to knowledge and concept acquisition, to memory performance and development, to problem solving, learning and self-regulation. At the same time, language development draws on cognitive and socio-cognitive abilities. Analysing the developmental interrelations between language and cognition is relevant for a better understanding of developmental trajectories in typical development and developmental disorders as well as for the promotion of child development. Contrary to some overarching theories, it is widely documented that developmental profiles can be quite heterogeneous: the developmental tasks the child is facing in the various domains of development, the trajectories, and phenomena are specific to the respective developmental domain or even subdomain. Yet there are significant and dynamic interrelationships between the acquisition of language structures, meanings, and use and various cognitive abilities and their development. This chapter introduces the reader to a variety of dynamic interrelationships between the acquisition of language and various facets of cognitive and sociocognitive development (e.g., information processing, learning and memory; conceptual development; development of metacognition, theory of mind and self-regulation).

Type
Chapter
Information
Language Development
Individual Differences in a Social Context
, pp. 122 - 143
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, A. M., & Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Phonological working memory and speech production in preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 403414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2007). Nonword repetition in specific language impairment: More than a phonological short-term memory deficit. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 919924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 13111320.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90197). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R., & Carey, S. (2012). Core cognition and beyond: The acquisition of physical and numerical knowledge. In Pauen, S. (Ed.), Early childhood development and later outcome (pp. 3365). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (1995). Understanding the link between joint attention and language. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 131158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1994). Modularity, domain specificity and the development of language. Discussions in neuroscience, 10, 136149.Google Scholar
Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children’s private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 443463.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2001). Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475511). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1987). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning. In Day, J. D. & Borkowski, J. G. (Eds.), Intelligence and exceptionality: New directions for theory, assessment, and instructional practices (pp. 81132). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1976). Reference in memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition, 4, 125153.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 118.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117, 18581878.Google Scholar
Dorn, K., Weinert, S., & Falck-Ytter, T. (2018). Watch and listen: A cross-cultural study of audio-visual-matching behavior in 4.5-month-old infants in German and Swedish talking faces. Infant Behavior and Development, 52, 121129.Google Scholar
Ebert, S. (2011). Was Kinder über die mentale Welt wissen – Die Entwicklung von deklarativem Metagedächtnis aus der Sicht der ‘Theory of Mind’. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
Ebert, S. (2015). Longitudinal relations between theory of mind and metacognition and the impact of language. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 559586.Google Scholar
Ebert, S., Lockl, K., Weinert, S., Anders, Y., Kluczniok, K., & Rossbach, H.-G. (2013). Internal and external influences on vocabulary development in preschool children. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 24, 138154.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 7199.Google Scholar
Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: Connectionism in a developmental framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Furth, H. G. (1966). Thinking without language: Psychological implications of deafness. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (1995). Is nonword repetition a test of phonological memory or long-term knowledge? It all depends on the nonwords. Memory and Cognition, 23, 8394.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336360.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Min, H. (1997). Word meaning biases or language-specific effects? Evidence from English, Spanish and Korean. First Language, 17, 3156.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887898.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., Choi, S., & Baumberger, T. (1996). Cross-linguistic differences in early semantic and cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 11, 197227.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grosse Wiesmann, C., Friederici, A. D., Singer, T., & Steinbeis, N. (2017). Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children. Developmental Science, 20, e12445.Google Scholar
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., Schaafstal, A. M., & Heffernan, T. M. (1991). Speech, ‘inner speech’, and the development of short-term memory: Effects of picture-labeling on recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 220234.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2015). An alternative to domain-general or domain-specific frameworks for theorizing about human evolution and ontogenesis. Neuroscience, 19, 91104.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Language, speech, and communication. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119148). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74, 11301144.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1989). Categorization and naming in children. Problems of induction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maurer, D., & Werker, J. F. (2014). Perceptual narrowing during infancy: A comparison of language and faces. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 154178.Google Scholar
Morris, C. A., Lenhoff, H. M., & Wang, P. P. (Eds.). (2006). Williams-Beuren Syndrome. Research, evaluation, and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Neubauer, C. (2009). Funktionale Relevanz und Mikrogenese selbstbezogener Sprache im Vorschulalter. Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 1128.Google Scholar
Nilsson, K. K., & de López, K. J. (2016). Theory of mind in children with specific language impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Development, 87, 143153.Google Scholar
Oléron, P. (1977). Language and mental development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125137.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 703732). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rivera-Flores, G. W. (2015). Self-instructional cognitive training to reduce impulsive cognitive style in children with attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13, 2746.Google Scholar
Rose, E., Lehrl, S., Ebert, S., & Weinert, S. (2018). Long-term relations between children’s language, the home literacy environment, and socioemotional development from ages 3 to 8. Early Education and Development, 29, 342356.Google Scholar
Rose, E., Weinert, S., & Ebert, S. (2018). The roles of receptive and productive language in children’s socioemotional development. Social Development, 27, 777792.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Werker, J. F., & Werner, L. A. (2006). The infant’s auditory world: Hearing, speech, and the beginnings of language. In Damon, W. & Learner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 58108). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schick, B., de Villiers, P., de Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language and theory of mind: A study of deaf children. Child Development, 78, 376396.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. (2015). Memory development from early childhood through emerging adulthood. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Schuth, E., Köhne, J., & Weinert, S. (2017). The influence of academic vocabulary knowledge on school performance. Learning & Instruction, 49, 157165.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). The cross linguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. (2001). How domain-general processes may create domain-specific biases. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 4570). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 8996.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In Tomasello, M. & Bates, E. (Eds.), Language development (pp. 111128). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van der Lely, J. K. J., & Pinker, S. (2014). The biological basis of language: Insights from developmental grammatical impairments. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 586595.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R., & Leddon, E. M. (2011). Early word-learning and conceptual development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd ed. (pp. 180208). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinert, F. E. (1996). Cognitive development: Individual differences. In DeCorte, E. & Weinert, F. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 268272). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Weinert, S. (1992). Deficits in acquiring language structure: The importance of using prosodic cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 545571.Google Scholar
Weinert, S. (2000). Sprach- und Gedächtnisprobleme dysphasisch-sprachgestörter Kinder: Sind rhythmisch-prosodische Defizite eine Ursache? In Müller, K. & Aschersleben, G. (Eds.), Rhythmus. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (pp. 255283). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Weinert, S. (2003). Entwicklung von Sprache und Denken. In Schneider, W. & Knopf, M. (Eds.), Entwicklung, Lehren und Lernen (pp. 93108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Weinert, S. (2009). Implicit and explicit modes of learning: Similarities and differences from a developmental perspective. Linguistics, 47, 241271.Google Scholar
Weinert, S. (2010). Beziehungen zwischen Sprachentwicklung und Gedächtnisentwicklung. In Trolldenier, H.-P., Lenhard, W., & Marx, P. (Eds.), Brennpunkte der Gedächtnisforschung: Entwicklungs- und pädagogisch-psychologische Perspektiven (pp. 147170). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Weinert, S., & Artelt, C. (2019). Measurement of skills and achievement – A critical assessment of theoretical and methodological concepts. In Becker, R. (Ed.), Research handbook on the sociology of education (pp. 106131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Weinert, S., Ebert, S., Lockl, K., & Kuger, S. (2012). Disparitäten im Wortschatzerwerb: Zum Einfluss des Arbeitsgedächtnisses und der Anregungsqualität in Kindergarten und Familie auf den Erwerb lexikalischen Wissens. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40, 425.Google Scholar
Weismer, E. S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory capacity in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 12491260.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103128.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×