Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:52:22.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Paul Kockelman
Affiliation:
Barnard College, Columbia University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language, Culture, and Mind
Natural Constructions and Social Kinds
, pp. 237 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Richard N. 1965. Migraciones internas en Guatemala: Expansión agraria de los indígenas Kekchiés hacia el Petén. Guatemala City: Centro Editorial ‘José de Pineda Ibarra’.Google Scholar
Adams, Richard N. and Rubel, Arthur J. 1967. ‘Sickness and social relations’, in Nash, Manning (ed.), Social anthropology, pp. 125–50. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif 1998. ‘Stereotypes and registers of honorific language’, Language in Society 272: 151–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, N. J. 1985. ‘The category of the person in Mauss’, in Carrithers, M., Collins, S., and Lukes, S. (eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history, pp. 26–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix 1992. ‘Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech’, Journal of Pragmatics 18: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 2001. ‘Politics’, in McKeon, Richard (ed.), pp. 1210–33. The basic works of Aristotle. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 2003 [1955]. How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Averill, James R. 1980. ‘A constructivist view of emotion’, in Plutchik, R. and Kellerma, H. (eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience, pp. 305–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1990. Art and answerability. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berinstein, Ava 1985. Evidence for multiattachment in Kekchi. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent and Kay, Paul 1969. Basic color terms, their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard 1984 [1933]. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1989a [1889]. ‘On alternating sounds’, in Stocking, G. W. (ed.), Franz Boas Reader, pp. 72–7. Chicago: Midway Reprints.Google Scholar
Boas, F. 1989b [1910]. ‘Psychological problems in anthropology’, in Stocking, G. W. (ed.), Franz Boas Reader, pp. 243–54. Chicago: Midway Reprints.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1977 [1972]. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994. Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz 1995 [1874]. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian and Yule, George 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope 1994. ‘The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location’, Linguistics 32: 743–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl 1990. Theory of language: The representational function of language, Goodwin, D.F. (trans.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, William E. 1960. Time, tense, and the verb. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, William E. 1969. New lands and old traditions: Kekchi cultivators in the Guatemalan lowlands. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Chappel, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.) 1996. The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part-whole relation. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef
Chen Cao, Ernesto, et al. 1997. Diccionario Q'eqchi'. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
Conklin, Beth, and Lynn, M. Morgan 1996. ‘Babies, bodies, and the production of personhood in North America and a native Amazonian society’, Ethos 24: 657–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D' Andrade, Roy 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D' Atri, A. 1995. ‘The theory of interjections in Vico and Rousseau’, in Formigari, L. and Gambarara, D., Historical roots of linguistic theories, pp. 115–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, Jack W. 1980. ‘Beyond definiteness: Trace of identity in discourse’, in Chafe, Wallace (ed.), The Pear stories, pp. 203–74. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, Jack W. 1987. ‘The discourse basis of ergativity’, Language 63: 805–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. 1973. ‘Towards a grammar for dyadic conversations’, Semiotica 9: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile 1947 [1912]. The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad 1986. Interjektionen. Tübington: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada Monroy, Austín 1990. Vida esotérica Maya-K'ekchí. Guatemala: Edición Cultural.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeze, Ray A. 1970. Case in a grammar of K'ekchi' Maya. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1997 [1892]. ‘On Sinn and Bedeutung’, in Beaney, Michael (ed.), The Frege reader, pp. 151–71. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul 1979. ‘The symbol and its relatively non-arbitrariness’, in Dill, Anwar S., Language, context, and the imagination: Essays by Paul Friedrich, pp. 1–61. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Friestad, M. and Wright, P. 1995. ‘Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researchers’ beliefs about the psychology of advertising', Journal of Consumer Research 22: 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, D., Harris, P. L., Ohmoto, M., and Hamazaki, T., 1988. ‘Japanese children's understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotions’, International Journal of Behavioral Development 11: 203–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillen, Jack 1948. ‘Magical fright’, Psychiatry 11: 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy 1980. ‘The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements’, Studies in Language 52: 163–93.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1981a. ‘Footing’, in Forms of talk, pp. 124–59. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1981b. ‘Replies and responses’, in Forms of talk, pp. 5–77. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving 1981c. ‘Response cries’, in Forms of talk, pp. 78–123. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Greenberg, J.H. (ed.), Universals of language, pp. 58–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1980. ‘Universals of kinship terminology: Their nature and the problem of their explanation’, in Maquet, Jacques (ed.), On linguistic anthropology: Essays in honor of Harry Hoijer, pp. 9–32. Malibu: Undena.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul 1989a. ‘The causal theory of perception’, in Studies in the ways of words, pp. 224–47. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul 1989b. ‘Utterer's meaning and intention’, Studies in the ways of words, pp. 86–116. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul 1989c. ‘Logic and conversation’, in Studies in the ways of words, pp. 22–40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul E. 1997. What emotions really are. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John 1985. Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1989. ‘Elements of Maya style’, in Hanks, W. F. and Rice, D. S. (eds.), Word and image in Maya culture: Explorations in language, writing, and representation, pp. 92–111. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1991. Referential practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1993. ‘Metalanguage and the pragmatics of deixis’, in Lucy, J. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, John 1998. ‘The intentionality all-stars’, in Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind, pp. 127–70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John 2003. ‘Comments on interjections’, Current Anthropology 44(4): 480–1.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried 1966. ‘On the origin of language’, in Gode, A. (trans.), On the origin of language: Two essays, pp. 84–166. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Raymond, Geoffrey 2005. ‘The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction’, Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. and Mannheim, Bruce 1992. ‘Language and world view’, Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 381–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofling, Charles Andrew 1993. ‘Marking space and time in Itzaj Maya narrative’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32: 164–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Douglas 1992. ‘Cross-cultural differences in the self’, Journal of Anthropological Research 48: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. R. 1984. ‘Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature’, in Schiffrin, D. (ed.) Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, pp. 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. 1975. Ethnicity in Southern Belize: The Kekchi and the Mopan. Columbia, MO: Curators of the University of Missouri, Museum Brief No. 21.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray 2003. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, Roman 1990a. ‘Shifters and verbal categories’, in Waugh, L. R. and Monville-Burston, M. (eds.), On language, pp. 386–92. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman 1990b. ‘The speech event and the functions of language’, in Waugh, L. R. and Monville-Burston, M. (eds.), On language, pp. 69–79. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, William 1893. The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Jaynes, Julian 1976. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1965. The philosophy of grammar. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark 1987. The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1964 [1781]. Critique of pure reason. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
King, Arden R. 1974. Coban and the Verapaz: History and cultural process in northern Guatemala. New Orleans: Tulane University.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 1998. ‘Legend of the Suns: Reproducing the production of a Nahuatl text’, Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl, 28: 219–39.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 1999a. ‘The collection of Copal among the Q'eqchi’-Maya', Research in Economic Anthropology Vol. 20: 163–94. Edited by B. Issac. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 1999b. ‘Poetic function and logical form, ideal languages and forms of life’, Chicago Anthropology Exchange Vol. XXIX: 34–50.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2002. ‘Minding language and measuring labor: Stance and subjectivity in the context of neoliberal globalization’. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Kockelman, Paul 2003. ‘The interclausal relations hierarchy in Q'eqchi’-Maya', International Journal of American Linguistics 69(1): 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2004. ‘Stance and subjectivity’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2005a. ‘The semiotic stance’, Semiotica 157(1): 233–304.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2005b. ‘Psychological depth is the internalization of dialogical breadth: Modal clitics and mental states in Q'eqchi’-Maya', Language and Communication 26: 55–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2006. ‘Representations of the world: Memories, perceptions, beliefs, plans, and intentions’, Semiotica 162(1): 72–125.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2007a. ‘Enclosure and disclosure’, Public Culture 19(2): 303–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2007b. ‘From status to contract revisited: Modality, temporality, circulation, and subjectivity’, Anthropological Theory 7(2): 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2007c. ‘Agency: The relation between meaning, power, and knowledge’, Current Anthropology 48(3): 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2007d. ‘Number, unit, and utility in a Mayan community: The relation between use-value, labor-power, and personhood’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13(2): 401–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul 2009. ‘Inalienable possession as grammatical category and discourse pattern’, Studies in Language 33(1): 25–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred 1909. ‘Classificatory systems of relations’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 39: 77–84.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sarah 1997. ‘The making and unmaking of persons: Notes on aging and gender in North India’, Ethos 25: 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1994. ‘Vision, shape, and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description’, Linguistics 32: 791–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, David P. 2006. Grammars of space: explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillard, A. 1998. ‘Ethnopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind’, Psychological Bulletin 1231: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, Ralph 1936. The study of man. New York: Appleton, Century, and Crofts.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992a. Grammatical categories and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1992b. Linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1993a. ‘Reflexive language and the human disciplines’, in Lucy, John A. (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, pp. 9–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1993b. Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Catherine A. 1988. Unnatural emotions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław 1936. ‘The problem of meaning in primitive languages’, in Ogden, C. K. and Richards, A. I. (eds.), The meaning of meaning, pp. 296–336. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel 1954. The gift. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel 1979. ‘A category of the human mind: The notion of person, the notion of “self”’, in Brewster, Ben (trans.), Sociology and psychology: Essays by Marcel Mauss, pp. 57–94. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Brian 1996. ‘Standing stomachs, clamoring chests and cooling livers: Metaphors in the psychological lexicon of Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics 26: 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, Katharina and Schrabback, Susanne 1999. ‘Interjections in adult-child discourse: The cases of German HM and NA’, Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montes, Rosa Graciela 1999. ‘The development of discourse markers in Spanish: Interjections’, Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Max 1862. Lectures on the science of language. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Munn, Nancy 1992. The fame of Gawa. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, W. M. 1980. ‘Grammatical parallelism in Quiche ritual language’, inProceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp. 387–99. Berkley: Berkley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
O' Nell, Charles and Selby, Henry 1968. ‘Sex differences in the incidence of susto in two Zapotec pueblos: An analysis of the relationships between sex role expectations and a folk illness’, Ethnology 7: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padley, George A. 1976. Grammatical theory in western Europe 1500–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pedroni, Guillermo 1991. Territorialidad Kekchi: una aproximación al acceso a la tierra: la migración y la titulación. Guatemala City: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1955. ‘Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs’, in Buchler, Justus (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, pp. 98–119. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–35. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. and Conrad, F. G. 1989. ‘Folk psychology of mental activities’, Psychological Review 96(2): 187–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1966. ‘On the origin of language’, in Gode, A. (trans.), On the origin of language: Two essays, pp. 1–83. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. 1974. ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’, Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1972. ‘On the sociology of primitive trade’, in Stone age economics, pp. 185–230. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1976. ‘Colors and cultures’, Semiotica 16: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1985 [1927]. ‘The unconscious patterning of behavior in society’, in Mandelbaum, David G. (ed.), Selected writings in language, culture, and personality, pp. 544–59. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sapper, Karl 1985. The Verapaz in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: A contribution to the historical geography and ethnography of northeastern Guatemala. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand 1983 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K. A., and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.) 1998. Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secaira, Estuardo 1992. Conservation among the Q'eqchi'-Maya: A comparison of highland and lowland agriculture. Masters Thesis, Department of Conservation Biology and Sustainable Development. University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Sedat, Guillermo 1955. Nuevo diccionario de las lenguas K'ekchi' y Española. Chamelco, Alta Verapaz: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sharer, Robert J. 1994. The Ancient Maya. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel 1993. ‘Pointed lips, thumbs up, and cheek puffs: Some emblematic gestures in social interactional and ethnographic context’. Paper read at Symposium about Language and Society, Austin Texas (SALSA).
Shweder, Richard and Bourne, Edmund 1984. ‘Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally?’, in Shweder, Richard and LeVine, Robert (eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion, pp. 158–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1979. ‘Language structure and linguistic ideology’, in Cline, R., Hanks, W., and Hofbauer, C. (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1981. ‘The limits of awareness’, Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1993. ‘Of nominatives and datives: Universal grammar from the bottom up’, in Robert, D.Valin, (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, pp. 465–98. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael 1995 [1976]. ‘Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description’, in Blount, Ben G. (ed.), Language, culture, and society: A book of readings, pp. 187–221. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Diedre 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spiro, Melford 1993. ‘Is the Western conception of the self “peculiar” with the context of the world's cultures?’, Ethos 21: 107–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Stephen O. 1980a. Gramática Kekchí. Guatemala: Editorial Académica Centro Americana.Google Scholar
Stewart, Stephen O. 1980b. ‘Tense/aspect in Kekchi’, Georgetown University Papers on Languages and Linguistics 17: 72–90.Google Scholar
Stoll, Otto 1896. Die Maya-Sprachen der Pokom-Gruppe, Die Sprache der K'e'kchi-Indianer. Leipzig: K.F. Köhler's Antiquarium.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn 1988. The gender of the gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard 2000. Towards a cognitive semantics: Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1985a. Human agency and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1985b. ‘The person’, in Carrithers, M., Collins, S., and Lukes, S. (eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history, pp. 257–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles 1989. Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony 1991a. ‘A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English’, in Traugott, Elizabeth and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Grammaticalization II, pp. 313–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony 1991b. ‘The discourse conditions for the use of complementizer that in conversational English’, Journal of Pragmatics 15: 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael 1999. The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael and Call, Josep 1997. Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Terence 1980. ‘The social skin’, in Cherfas, J. and Lewin, R. (eds.), Not work alone, pp. 112–40. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Valin, Robert D. and LaPolla, Randy J. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valin, Robert D. and Wilkins, David P. 1993. ‘Predicting syntactic structure from semantic representations: remember in English and Mparntwe Arrernte’, in Robert, D.Valin, (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, pp. 499–534. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and society: The development of higher psychological pro­cesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Regina 1996. Los Alemanes en Guatemala, 1828–1944. Guatemala City, Afanes, S.A.Google Scholar
Wallace, A. F. and Carson, M. T. 1973. ‘Sharing and diversity in emotion terminology’, Ethos 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. 1985. ‘Inalienable wealth’, American Ethnologist 12: 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. 1992. Inalienable possessions. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H. M. 1990. The child's theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Wellman, H. M. and Estes, D. 1986. ‘Early understanding of mental entities: A reexamination of childhood realism’, Child Development 57: 910–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, H. M. and Hickling, A. K. 1994. ‘The mind's “I”: Children's conceptualization of the mind as an active agent’, Child Development 65: 1564–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1956a. ‘Grammatical categories’, in Carroll, John B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, pp. 87–101. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1956b. ‘The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language’, in Carroll, John B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, pp. 134–59. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1956c. ‘Some Verbal categories of Hopi’, in Carroll, John B. (ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, pp. 112–24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Sydney: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1992. ‘The semantics of interjections’, Journal of Pragmatics 18: 159–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilk, Richard R. 1991. Household ecology: Economic change and domestic life among the Kekchi Maya in Belize. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David 1992. ‘Interjections as deictics’, Journal of Pragmatics 18: 119–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas 1988. ‘A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality’, Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Michael R. 1972. A highland Maya people and their habitat: The natural history, demography and economy of the K'ekchi'. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. 1995. Maya resurgence in Guatemala. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. ‘Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception’, Cognition 13: 103–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. ‘Clitics and particles’, Language 61(2): 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Barnard College, Columbia University
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Mind
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711893.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Barnard College, Columbia University
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Mind
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711893.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Paul Kockelman, Barnard College, Columbia University
  • Book: Language, Culture, and Mind
  • Online publication: 04 May 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511711893.010
Available formats
×