Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- In Memoriam
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Language Change and Diversity at the Crossroads of Historical Linguistics, Language Documentation, and Linguistic Typology
- 2 Using the Acoustic Correlates of Voice Quality as Explanations for the Changes in the Descriptions of Xinkan Glottalized Consonants
- 3 Variation and Change in the Distribution of *-(V)n and *-(V)w in Kaqchikel
- 4 Origins of Metathesis in Batsbi, Part II: Intransitive Verbs
- 5 Some Remarks on Etymological Opacity in Austronesian Languages
- 6 The Relationship between Aquitanian and Basque: Achievements and Challenges of the Comparative Method in a Context of Poor Documentation
- 7 Evidence, New and Old, Against the Late *k(’) > *ch(’) Areal Shift Hypothesis
- 8 Are All Language Isolates Equal? The Case of Mapudungun
- 9 The Historical Linguistics and Archaeology of Ancient North America: “A Linguistic Look” at the Hopewell
- 10 The Lenguas de Bolivia Project: Background and Further Prospects
- 11 The Typology of Grammatical Relations in Tuparian Languages with Special Focus on Akuntsú
- 12 Meskwaki (Algonquian) Evidence against Basic Word Order and Configurational Models of Argument Roles
- 13 The Syntax of Alignment: An Emergentist Typology
- Subject and Scholar Index
- Languages and Linguistic Families Index
2 - Using the Acoustic Correlates of Voice Quality as Explanations for the Changes in the Descriptions of Xinkan Glottalized Consonants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 November 2024
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- In Memoriam
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Language Change and Diversity at the Crossroads of Historical Linguistics, Language Documentation, and Linguistic Typology
- 2 Using the Acoustic Correlates of Voice Quality as Explanations for the Changes in the Descriptions of Xinkan Glottalized Consonants
- 3 Variation and Change in the Distribution of *-(V)n and *-(V)w in Kaqchikel
- 4 Origins of Metathesis in Batsbi, Part II: Intransitive Verbs
- 5 Some Remarks on Etymological Opacity in Austronesian Languages
- 6 The Relationship between Aquitanian and Basque: Achievements and Challenges of the Comparative Method in a Context of Poor Documentation
- 7 Evidence, New and Old, Against the Late *k(’) > *ch(’) Areal Shift Hypothesis
- 8 Are All Language Isolates Equal? The Case of Mapudungun
- 9 The Historical Linguistics and Archaeology of Ancient North America: “A Linguistic Look” at the Hopewell
- 10 The Lenguas de Bolivia Project: Background and Further Prospects
- 11 The Typology of Grammatical Relations in Tuparian Languages with Special Focus on Akuntsú
- 12 Meskwaki (Algonquian) Evidence against Basic Word Order and Configurational Models of Argument Roles
- 13 The Syntax of Alignment: An Emergentist Typology
- Subject and Scholar Index
- Languages and Linguistic Families Index
Summary
Introduction
The documentation of endangered languages presents implications for many areas of linguistic research and language community identity. Among these is a link between the documentary resources of a language and its historical reconstruction which in turn informs descriptive standards and revitalization efforts. The purpose of this chapter is to address that link concerning one aspect of Xinkan phonology: the glottalized consonants. The Xinkan language family is a group of at least four extinct languages that were once spoken in southeastern Guatemala: Guazacapán Xinka, Chiquimulilla Xinka, Jumaytepeque Xinka, and Yupiltepeque Xinka (ISO codes: xin, qco, qda, qhq, qsd). These languages have been greatly influenced by the extreme contact in the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area and exhibit borrowings from Mayan, Mixe-Zoquean, Uto-Aztecan, and other languages in the region (see Campbell et al. 1986). The last speakers of the Xinkan languages resided in the departments of Santa Rosa and Jalapa, as shown on the map in Figure 2.1.
Currently, after years of repression, genocide, and marginalization the Xinkan community is engaged in efforts to revitalize their languages and to build a unique cultural identity (see Rogers 2016b, 2020). Due to the lack of speakers, or rememberers, these revitalization efforts are dependent on the available linguistic descriptions of the Xinkan languages. Following from this, both linguists and community members note that discrepancies in these resources are a source of confusion. For example, some grammatical features are not present in all Xinkan records. When a resource is missing features, it opens up discussions about the importance they (might have) had in the languages’ grammatical systems. Similarly, general typological linguistic characterizations of other linguistic features do not always match the specific Xinkan elements as recorded in the available documentation. This mismatch makes the descriptions appear to be biased toward some prescriptive standard rather than an objective treatment of the languages. This chapter focuses on resolving these types of discrepancies related to glottalized consonants and provides a clearer picture of the diachronic properties of these consonants in the Xinkan languages and a better understanding of their value for community revitalization efforts, thus highlighting the link between language documentation and historical linguistic methodologies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Change and Linguistic DiversityStudies in Honour of Lyle Campbell, pp. 19 - 46Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2022