Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- In Memoriam
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Language Change and Diversity at the Crossroads of Historical Linguistics, Language Documentation, and Linguistic Typology
- 2 Using the Acoustic Correlates of Voice Quality as Explanations for the Changes in the Descriptions of Xinkan Glottalized Consonants
- 3 Variation and Change in the Distribution of *-(V)n and *-(V)w in Kaqchikel
- 4 Origins of Metathesis in Batsbi, Part II: Intransitive Verbs
- 5 Some Remarks on Etymological Opacity in Austronesian Languages
- 6 The Relationship between Aquitanian and Basque: Achievements and Challenges of the Comparative Method in a Context of Poor Documentation
- 7 Evidence, New and Old, Against the Late *k(’) > *ch(’) Areal Shift Hypothesis
- 8 Are All Language Isolates Equal? The Case of Mapudungun
- 9 The Historical Linguistics and Archaeology of Ancient North America: “A Linguistic Look” at the Hopewell
- 10 The Lenguas de Bolivia Project: Background and Further Prospects
- 11 The Typology of Grammatical Relations in Tuparian Languages with Special Focus on Akuntsú
- 12 Meskwaki (Algonquian) Evidence against Basic Word Order and Configurational Models of Argument Roles
- 13 The Syntax of Alignment: An Emergentist Typology
- Subject and Scholar Index
- Languages and Linguistic Families Index
11 - The Typology of Grammatical Relations in Tuparian Languages with Special Focus on Akuntsú
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- In Memoriam
- List of Abbreviations
- 1 Language Change and Diversity at the Crossroads of Historical Linguistics, Language Documentation, and Linguistic Typology
- 2 Using the Acoustic Correlates of Voice Quality as Explanations for the Changes in the Descriptions of Xinkan Glottalized Consonants
- 3 Variation and Change in the Distribution of *-(V)n and *-(V)w in Kaqchikel
- 4 Origins of Metathesis in Batsbi, Part II: Intransitive Verbs
- 5 Some Remarks on Etymological Opacity in Austronesian Languages
- 6 The Relationship between Aquitanian and Basque: Achievements and Challenges of the Comparative Method in a Context of Poor Documentation
- 7 Evidence, New and Old, Against the Late *k(’) > *ch(’) Areal Shift Hypothesis
- 8 Are All Language Isolates Equal? The Case of Mapudungun
- 9 The Historical Linguistics and Archaeology of Ancient North America: “A Linguistic Look” at the Hopewell
- 10 The Lenguas de Bolivia Project: Background and Further Prospects
- 11 The Typology of Grammatical Relations in Tuparian Languages with Special Focus on Akuntsú
- 12 Meskwaki (Algonquian) Evidence against Basic Word Order and Configurational Models of Argument Roles
- 13 The Syntax of Alignment: An Emergentist Typology
- Subject and Scholar Index
- Languages and Linguistic Families Index
Summary
Introduction
This chapter investigates aspects of grammatical relations in five Tuparian languages (Akuntsú, Makuráp, Mekéns (Sakurabiat), Tuparí, and Wayoró), with special focus on Akuntsú, in order to compare and discuss their respective alignment patterns and the relationship between these patterns and word order.
Van Valin and LaPolla (1997) have shown that grammatical relations and/or semantic roles are essential to well-formed clauses, to how speakers create meaning, and how hearers interpret it. Coding of grammatical relations varies across languages, ranging from morphological case marking and word order to the discourse-pragmatic features.
The present work addresses the similarities and unique characteristics of grammatical relations in Tuparian languages. In addition, this chapter presents some of the special characteristics of Akuntsú, where the presence of an inanimate patient of a transitive construction was said to trigger a change in the alignment pattern. This study sheds light on the grammatical organization of Akuntsú, and raises the hypothesis that this language does not differentiate between possessive and intransitive con-structions due to the character of its lexical roots. The lack of case marking in core arguments in the Tuparian languages indicates that grammatical relations are sensitive to verb semantics and verb categories, such as voice, word order, person markers, and animacy.
The rest of this chapter is organized as follows: the remainder of Section 1 outlines the current status of some languages in Rondônia, their historical background, and typological features of Akuntsú; Section 2 offers an overview of grammatical relations in Tuparian languages; Section 3 introduces the relationship between grammatical relations, word order, and animacy hierarchy; Section 4 discusses nominal and verbal syntax in Akuntsú; and Section 5 presents concluding remarks.
Languages of Rondônia
The term Tupian, designating a language family, has been employed since Rodrigues (1955) to refer to a linguistic family which includes the Tupi–Guarani subfamily and other smaller and lesser-known subfamilies. In 1986, Rodrigues revised the internal relationships within the Tupian family, accounting for ten subfamilies: Arikém, Aweti, Juruna, Mawé, Mondé, Mundurukú, Puruborá, Ramarama, Tuparí, and Tupi–Guaraní (Rodrigues 1986). Recent studies on genetic relationship and internal classification of the Tupian family have improved our understanding of this language family (Cabral and Rodrigues 2012; Galucio et al. 2015).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Language Change and Linguistic DiversityStudies in Honour of Lyle Campbell, pp. 224 - 241Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2022