Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:21:58.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2019

Tim McNamara
Tim McNamara
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language and Subjectivity , pp. 224 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abe, H. (2004). Lesbian bar talk in Shinjuku, Tokyo. In Okamoto, S. & Shibamoto Smith, J. S. (Eds.), Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People (pp. 205–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37.Google Scholar
Akiyama, T. (2004). Introducing speaking tests into a Japanese Senior High School entrance examination. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. (Revised edn). London: Verso.Google Scholar
‘The art of elocution. No. 2. Correct pronunciation’. (1912). In Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia. Available at: http://chestofbooks.com/food/household/Woman-Encyclopaedia-3/The-Art-Of-Elocution-No-2-Correct-Pronunciation.html, accessed 22.1.2018.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Urmson, J. & Sbisá, M., Eds.). Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, C. D. (2000). Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk. In Lee, A. & Poynton, C. (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2002). Polari: The Lost Language of Gay Men. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, P.(2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: ContinuumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P.(2008). Sexed Texts: Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (Ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1975.)Google Scholar
Banki, P. (2018). The Forgiveness to Come: The Holocaust and the Hyper-ethical. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The Essential Difference: Male and Female Brains and the Truth about Autism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bartrop, P. R. & Eisen, G. (Eds.) (1990). The Dunera Affair: A Documentary Resource Book. South Yarra, Victoria: Schwartz & Wilkinson with the Jewish Museum of Australia.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baynham, M. (2017). Intersections of necessity and desire in migration research: Queering the migration story. In Canagarajah, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language (pp. 431–47). Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bennington, G. & Derrida, J. (1993). Jacques Derrida (G. Bennington, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2013). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1999a). Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 572–6.Google Scholar
Billig, M.(1999b). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543–58.Google Scholar
Block, D. (2007). Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Block, D. & Cameron, D. (Eds.) (2002). Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2009. Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology, 50(4), 415–25.Google Scholar
Blum, D. (1997). Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences between Men and Women. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16, 645–68.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.(1991). Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.(2005). Interviewer Variability in Language Proficiency Interviews. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Brown, A. & McNamara, T. (2004). ‘The devil is in the detail’: Researching gender issues in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 524–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (1998). The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage: Revised 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burck, C. (2005). Multilingual Living: Explorations of Language and Subjectivity. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Butler, C. W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Membership-in-action: Operative identities in a family meal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2462–74.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.(1999). Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2010). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17(1): 67–93.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.(1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. & Meinhoff, U. H. (Eds.), Language and Masculinity (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.(2007). The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.(2010). Sex/gender, language and the new biologism. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 173–92.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. P. (Ed.) (2010). Race and News: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, J. & Pauwels, A. (2005). Boys and Foreign Language Learning: Real Boys Don’t Do Languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37(1), 13–34.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. & Trudgill, P. (Eds.) (1998). The Sociolinguistics Reader: Gender and Discourse (Vol. II). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1966). Linguistic theory. In Mead, R. C. (Ed.), Reports of the Working Committee (pp. 43–49). New York: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1972) Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1992). The interpenetration of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 291–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Coates, J.(1997a). One-at-a-time: The organisation of men’s talk. In Johnson, S. & Meinhof, U. (Eds.), Language and Masculinity (pp. 107–29). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coates, J.(1997b). The construction of a collaborative floor in women’s friendly talk. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives (pp. 55–89). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (2013). Women, Men and Everyday Talk. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(4), 161–70. Repr. in S. P. Corder (1981) Error Analysis and Interlanguage (pp. 5–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Damousi, J. (2010). Colonial Voices: A Cultural History of English in Australia, 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 102–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, A. 1997. Australian immigrant gatekeeping through English language tests: How important is proficiency? In Huhta, A., Kohonen, V., Kurki-Suonio, L. & Luoma, S. (Eds.), Current Developments and Alternatives in Language Assessment (pp. 71–84). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä and University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Davies, J. (2003). Expressions of gender: An analysis of pupils’ gendered discourse styles in small group classroom discussions. Discourse and Society, 14(2), 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, D. (2013). Conversation analysis and membership categories. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1050–5.) Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The Second Sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). London: Vintage. (Original work published in 1949.)Google Scholar
De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1998). Monolingualism of the Other, or, The Prosthesis of Origin (P. Mensah, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (2005). Shibboleth: For Paul Celan. In T. Dutoit & O. Pasanen (Eds.), Sovereignties in Question: The Poetics of Paul Celan (pp. 1–64). New York: Fordham University Press. (Original work published in 1986.)Google Scholar
Derrida, J. & Roudinesco, E. (2004). For What Tomorrow: A Dialogue (J. Fort, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Emotions in Multiple Languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1984). Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 129–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (2005). Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 503–26.Google Scholar
Eades, D.(2009). Testing the claims of asylum seekers: The role of language analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
Eades, D. & Arends, J. (2004). Using language analysis in the determination of the national origin of asylum seekers. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 179–99.Google Scholar
Eades, D., Fraser, H., Siegel, J., McNamara, T. & Baker, B. (2003). Linguistic identification in the determination of nationality: A preliminary report. Language Policy, 2(2), 179–99.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–90.Google Scholar
Essed, P. (1990). Everyday Racism: Reports from Women of Two Cultures (C. Jaffé, Trans.). Claremont, CA: Hunter House.Google Scholar
Essed, P. (1991). Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.(2001) Language and Power (2nd edn). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.(2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 258–84). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). New York: Grove Press. (Original work published in 1961.)Google Scholar
Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). New York: Grove Press. (Original work published in 1952.)Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1922). Reden an die deutsche Nation [Addresses to the German nation] (R. F. Jones and G. H. Turnbull, Trans.). Chicago; London: The Open Court Publishing Company. (Original work published in 1808.)Google Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972). Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25(4), 397–406.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Membership Categorisation Analysis. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie & T. L. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi018.Google Scholar
Flannery, T. (Ed.) (2002). The Birth of Melbourne. Melbourne: Text Publishing.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (R. Howard, Trans.). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed., C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1998). Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Vol. II of Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (Faubion, J. D., Ed., R. Hurley and others, Trans.). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal. Lectures at the Collège de France 1974–1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fraser, H. (2011). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin: A response to Tina Cambier-Langeveld. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(1), 121–30.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1955). A difficulty in the path of psycho-analysis. In Strachey, J. (Trans. and Ed.), The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVII, pp. 135–44). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published in 1917.)Google Scholar
Frosh, S. (2005). Hate and the ‘Jewish Science’: Anti-Semitism, Nazism, and Psychoanalysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 253–66.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gee, J. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (5th edn). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.(1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.(1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(2), 133–6.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.(1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.Google Scholar
Gowers, Sir E. (1965). Fowler’s Modern English Usage, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In Hall, S. & du Gay, P. (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In Hall, S. (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 13–64). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1807.)Google Scholar
Heggoy, A. A. (1973). Education in French Algeria: An essay on cultural conflict. Comparative Education Review, 17(2), 180–97.Google Scholar
Henriques, J. (1984). Social psychology and the politics of racism. In Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.), Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity (pp. 60–89). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J.(2009). Conversation Analysis as social theory. In Turner, B. S. (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 300–20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29.Google Scholar
Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (Eds.) (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (1998). Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist, 100, 680–9.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (2008). The Everyday Language of White Racism. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoffman, E. (1989). Lost in Translation: A Life in a New Language. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1986). Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society, 15(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In Fitzgerald, R. & Housley, W. (Eds.), Advances in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 1–21). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 663–7.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von. (1999). On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species (M. Losonsky, Ed., P. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1836.)Google Scholar
Hutton, C. (1999). Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-Tongue Fascism, Race, and the Science of Language. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–92.Google Scholar
Inglis, K., Spark, S., Winter, J. & Bunyan, C. (2018). Dunera Lives: A Visual History. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar
James, H. 1999. The speech of American women. In Walker, P. A. (Ed.), Henry James on Culture: Collected Essays on Politics and the American Cultural Scene (pp. 58–81). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and interactions resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interactional Competence (pp. 63–92). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In Brennan, R. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th edn, pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.Google Scholar
Kane, M.(2012). Validating score interpretations and uses. Language Testing, 29(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Kapuściński, R. (2008). The Other. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kinsman, G. (2004). The Canadian Cold War on queers: Sexual regulation and resistance. In Cavell, R. (Ed.), Love, Hate and Fear in Canada’s Cold War (pp. 108–32). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kissau, S. (2006). Gender differences in motivation to learn French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(3): 401–22.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2000) Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 163–93.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C.(2005). Speaking as a heterosexual: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 221–65.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C.(2006) Talking sex and gender. In Drew, P., Raymond, G. & Weinberg, D. (Eds.), Talk in Interaction in Social Research Methods (pp. 155–70). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C.(Ed.) (2007). Feminist Conversation Analysis: Research by students at the University of York, UK. Special issue of Feminism and Psychology, 17(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, C. & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society, 10(3), 293–316.Google Scholar
Klemperer, V. 2000. The Language of the Third Reich (M. Brady, Trans.). London: Continuum. (Originally published in 1947 as LTI: Notizbuch eines Philologen. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.)Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2005). Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics, 26(4): 545–67.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject: What Foreign Language Learners Say about their Experience and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kubota, R. 2011. Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22, 248–60.Google Scholar
Lado, R. 1949. Measurement in English as a foreign language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. T.(2004). Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries (Bucholtz, M., Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lalu, P. (2000). The grammar of domination and the subjection of agency: Colonial texts and modes of evidence. Historical Theory, 39(4),45–68.Google Scholar
Land, V. & Kitzinger, C. (2005). Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist assumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 371–416.Google Scholar
Land, V. & Kitzinger, C.(2008). Closet talk: The contemporary relevance of the closet in lesbian and gay interaction. In Clarke, V. and Peel, E. (Eds.), Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives (pp. 147–71). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Language and National Origin Group. 2004. Guidelines for the use of language analysis in relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 261–6.Google Scholar
Lanzmann, C. (1985). Shoah: An Oral History of the Holocaust. The Complete Text of the Film. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. (2004). Collaborative turn sequences. In Lerner, G. (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 225–56). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lindström, A. & Sorjonen, M-.L. (2013). Affiliation in conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 350–69). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Louw-Potgieter, J. (1989). Covert racsim: An application of Essed’s analysis in a South African context. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 8(5), 307–19.Google Scholar
Lucy, N. (2004). A Derrida Dictionary. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Manley, R. (1691). The History of the Rebellions: In England, Scotland and Ireland: wherein, the most material passages, sieges, battles, policies and stratagems of war, are impartially related on both sides; from the year 1640 to the beheading of the Duke of Monmouth in 1685. In three parts. London: printed for L. Meredith at the Angel in Amen-Corner, and T. Newborough at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s-Church-Yard.Google Scholar
Mansfield, N. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Maryns, K. (2004). Identifying the asylum speaker: Reflections on the pitfalls of language analysis in the determination of national origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 240–60.Google Scholar
Maryns, K.(2005). Monolingual language ideologies and code choice in the Belgian asylum procedure. Language and Communication, 25, 299–314.Google Scholar
Maryns, K.(2006). The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. Manchester: St Jerome Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1987a). Language and social identity. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 33–58.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(1987b). Language and social identity: Israelis abroad. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6(3/4), 215–28.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(1996). Measuring Second Language Performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(1997). What do we mean by social identity? Competing frameworks, competing discourses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 561–7.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2005). 21st century Shibboleth: Language tests, identity and intergroup conflict. Language Policy, 4(4), 1–20.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2010). Reading Derrida: Language, identity and violence. Applied Linguistics Review, 1(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2011a). Managing learning: Authority and language assessment. Language Teaching 4(4), 500–15.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2011b) Measuring deficit. In Candlin, C. N. & Crichton, J. (Eds.), Discourses of Deficit (pp. 311–26). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2012). Poststructuralism and its challenges for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 473–82.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2013). Crossing boundaries: Journeys into language. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 343–56.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.(2014). 30 years on – Evolution or revolution? Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(2), 226–32.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Ryan, K. (2011). Fairness vs justice in language testing: The place of English literacy in the Australian Citizenship Test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2): 161–78.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D. (2012). Validating Lnguage and Country Knowledge Analyses in Asylum Cases: Report on the Project ‘Updating the Minimum Criteria Used by LINGUA’ for the Swiss Federal Office for Migration. Melbourne: School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D.(2018). Fairness and justice in Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin of asylum seekers (LADO). In I. M. Nick (Ed.), Forensic Linguistics: Asylum-Seekers, Refugees and Immigrants (pp. 155–74). Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D.(2019). Quality assurance in LADO: Issues of validity. In Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. M. (Eds.), Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
McNamara, T., van den Hazelkamp, C. & Verrips, M. (2016). LADO as a language test: Issues of validity. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 262–83.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd edn, pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.Google Scholar
Milani, T. (2018). Queering Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Moir, A. & Jessel, D. (1992). Brain Sex: The Real Difference between Men and Women. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
Moir, A. & Moir, B. (2000). Why Men Don’t Iron: The Fascinating and Unalterable Differences between Men and Women. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar
Muyskens, P., Verrips, M. & Zwaan, K. (Eds.) (2010). Language and Origin: The Role of Language in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Myers, K. A. (2005). Racetalk: Racism in Plain Sight. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Myers, K. A. & Williamson, P. (2001). Race talk: The perpetuation of racism through private discourse. Race & Society, 4, 3–26.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. & Nguyen, M. (2017). ‘Am I a good boy?’: Explicit membership categorization in parent–child interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 25–39.Google Scholar
Nirenberg, D. (2013). Anti-Judaism: The History of a Way of Thinking. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
North, B. (2000). The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. & Choi, J. (2010). Language and Culture: Reflective Narratives and the Emergence of Identity. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Barr, W. & Atkins, B. (1980). ‘Women’s language’ or ‘Powerless language’? In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & Furman, N. (Eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society (pp. 93–110): New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–75.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The Equivalence of Direct and Semi-direct Speaking Tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, K.(2002). The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing. Language Testing, 19, 169–92.Google Scholar
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
Orwell, (1968). Antisemitism in Britain. In Orwell, S. & Angus, I. (Eds.), As I Please: 1943–1945 (pp. 332–41). Vol. III of The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell. London: Secker and Warburg. (Original work published in 1945.)Google Scholar
Park, J. S.-Y. 2011. The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), 443–55.Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L., Schmid, M. & Zwaan, K. (Eds.) (2019). Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2006). Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A.(2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2): 163–88.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. & Blackledge, A. (Eds.) (2004). Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I. & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (Eds.) (2001). Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 115–38.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.(2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Picca, L. H. & Feagin, J. R. (2007). Two-Faced Racism: Whites in the Backstage and Frontstage. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pigna, F. (2005). The Myths of Argentine History: The Construction of a Past as a Justification of the Present. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porat, R. (2015). The Ausraeli approach: The Diasporic identity of Israelis in Australia. J-Wire, 11 August 2015. Available at www.jwire.com.au/the-ausraeli-approach-the-diasporic-identity-of-israelis-in-australia/#more-54708, retrieved 28.2.2018.Google Scholar
Porat, R.(2018) The Ausraelis: Israelis in Australia as a test case of distinctiveness vis-à-vis the Jewish diaspora. Israel Affairs, 24(1), 167–90.Google Scholar
Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Price, S. (1996). Comments on Bonny Norton Peirce’s ‘Social identity, investment, and language learning’. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 331–7.Google Scholar
Reath, A. 2004. Language analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity, and consequences. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 209–33.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (Eds.) (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. & Roffe, J. (Eds.) (2004). Understanding Derrida. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another (K. Blamey, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ros i Solé, C. & Fenoulhet, J. (2013a). Romanticising language learning: Beyond instrumentalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 257–65.Google Scholar
Ros i Solé, C. & Fenoulhet, J. (Eds.) (2013b). Romanticising language learning (Special issue). Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3).Google Scholar
Roth, J. K. (2000). What does the Holocaust have to do with Christianity? In Rittner, C., Smith, S. D. & Steinfeldt, I. (Eds.), The Holocaust and the Christian World (pp. 5–10). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ryave, A. L. (1978). On the achievement of a series of stories. In Schenkein, J. (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 113–32). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vols. I & II, Jefferson, G., Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (2013). Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury. (Original work published in 1916.)Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1992a). In another context. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 191–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1992b). Introduction. In Sacks, H., Lectures on Conversation (Jefferson, G., Ed.) (Vol. I, pp. ix–lxii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165–87.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1998a). Naïveté vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 577–82.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1998b). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 413–16.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(1999). ‘Schegloff’s texts’ as ‘Billig’s data’: A critical reply. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 558–72.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–82.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.(2007b). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schüpbach, D. (2009). Testing language, testing ethnicity? Policies and practices surrounding the ethnic German Aussiedler. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 78–82.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165–87.Google Scholar
Seidlhofer, B. (Ed.) (2003). Controversies in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3): 209–32.Google Scholar
Senghor, L. S. (1948). Anthologie de la nouvelle poésie nègre et malgache de langue française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1990). Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31.Google Scholar
Shnukal, A. (1983). Torres Strait Creole: The growth of a new Torres Strait language. Aboriginal History, 7, 173–85.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An introduction. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soyinka, W. (1963). Telephone conversation. In Moore, G. & Beier, U. (Eds.), Modern Poetry from Africa (p. 111). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. (2002). What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice. Discourse and Society, 13, 783–803.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A.(2005). Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A.(2011). On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a ‘real’ woman. In Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. (Eds.), Conversation and Gender (pp. 155–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. (2012) Feminist Conversation Analysis: Who needs it? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 292–7.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. & Green, R. (2007) On passing: The interactional organization of appearance attributions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. In Clarke, V. & Peel, E. (Eds.), Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives (pp. 335–68). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. (Eds.) (2011). Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, L. & Manderson, L. (2011). About you: Authority, objectivity and the generalised you. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1581–602.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E (2010) ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse and Society, 21(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E(2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). Interpreting interruption in conversation. In Music, B., Graczyk, R. & Wiltshire, C. (Eds.), Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: Parasession on Language in Context (pp. 266–87). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis (2nd edn). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Turner, L. (2002). Belonging, being friends and learning to write in a second language: The social construction of self and mind. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (2000). Cambridge IELTS 2: Examination Papers from the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A.(1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1998a). Waystage 1990 (Revised and corrected edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M.(1998b) Threshold 1990 (Revised and corrected edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M.(2001) Vantage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1989) Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 480–508.Google Scholar
Verrips, M. (2011). LADO and the pressure to draw strong conclusions: A response to Tina Cambier–Langeveld. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(1), 131–43.Google Scholar
Watson, D. R. (1997). Some general reflections on ‘categorization’ and ‘sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 49–75). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387–412.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1973). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (2007) Conversation Analysis, gender and sexuality. In Wetherall, A., Watson, B. & Gallois, C. (Eds.), Language, Discourse and Social Psychology (pp. 206–30). Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wistrich, R. S. (2010) A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wong, J. & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (Ed.) (1985). Labelling in Development Policy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London; New York: Sage.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, B. B., Wollard, K. A. & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, R. & He, A. (Eds.) (1998). Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zetter, R. (1991). Labelling refugees: Forming and reforming a bureaucratic identity. Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(1), 39–62.Google Scholar
Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–92.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Tim McNamara, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Language and Subjectivity
  • Online publication: 20 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108639606.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Tim McNamara, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Language and Subjectivity
  • Online publication: 20 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108639606.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Tim McNamara, University of Melbourne
  • Book: Language and Subjectivity
  • Online publication: 20 February 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108639606.012
Available formats
×