Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:40:08.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2023

Jacobo Myerston
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abusch, T. (1999). Marduk. In van der Toorn, K., Becking, B., and van der Horst, P. W., eds., Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, Leiden, pp. 543549.Google Scholar
Abusch, T. (2015). The Magical Ceremony Maqlû: A Critical Edition, Leiden.Google Scholar
Abusch, T., Schwemer, D., Luukko, M., and Buylaere, G. V. (2010). Corpus of Mesopotamian Anti-Witchcraft Rituals, vols. 1–4, Leiden.Google Scholar
Acevedo, J. (2020). Alphanumeric Cosmology from Greek into Arabic: The Idea of Stoicheia Through the Medieval Mediterranean, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Ahmadi, A. (2014). The Magoi and Daimones in Column vi of the Derveni Papyrus. Numen, 61(5–6), 484508.Google Scholar
Allan, K., and Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allen, S. L. (2015). The Splintered Divine: A Study of Istar, Baal, and Yahweh Divine Names and Divine Multiplicity in the Ancient Near East, Berlin.Google Scholar
Alster, B. (1999). Tiamat. In van der Toorn, K., Becking, B., and van der Horst, P. W., eds., Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, 2nd ed., Leiden, pp. 687689.Google Scholar
Anceschi, B. (2007). Die Götternamen in Platons Kratylos: Ein Vergleich mit dem Papyrus von Derveni, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Annus, A. (2002). The God Ninurta in the Mythology and Royal Ideology of Ancient Mesopotamia, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Annus, A. (2016). The Overturned Boat, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Archi, A. (2004). Translation of Gods: Kumarpi, Enlil, Dagan/NISABA, Ḫalki. Orientalia, 73(4), 319336.Google Scholar
Archi, A. (2007). Transmission of Recitative Literature by the Hittites. Altorientalische Forschungen, 34(2), 185203.Google Scholar
Arnould, D. (2009). Les noms des dieux dans la “Théogonie” d’Hésiode: étymologies et jeux de mots. Revue des études grecques, 122(1), 114.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1987). Omero, Esiodo e la riflessioni sulla lingua. In Poeti, eruditi e biografi: momenti della riflessione dei greci sulla letteratura, Pisa, pp. 1336.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G., and Tulli, M. (2006). Esegesi letteraria e riflessione sulla lingua nella cultura greca, Pisa.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (1996). Translating Gods: Religion as a Factor of Cultural (Un)Translatability. In Budick, S. and Iser, W., eds., The Translatability of Cultures: Figurations of the Space Between, Stanford, pp. 2536.Google Scholar
Auffarth, C. (1999). Ein seltsamer Priester und seine Jünger: Typisches und Charakteristisches im Bühnen-Sokrates des Aristophanes. In Pestalozzi, K., ed., Der Fragende Sokrates, Leipzig, pp. 7797.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1965). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955, New York.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1972). Name Magic in the “Odyssey”. California Studies in Classical Antiquity, 5, 119.Google Scholar
Ayali-Darshan, N. (2015). The Other Version of the Story of the Storm-god’s Combat with the Sea in the Light of Egyptian, Ugaritic, and Hurro-Hittite Texts. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, 15(1), 2051.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2008). Sumerian Gala Priests and Eastern Mediterranean Returning Gods: Tragic Lamentation in Cross-Cultural Perspective. In Suter, A., ed., Lament: Studies in the Ancient Mediterranean and Beyond, Oxford, pp. 1952.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2009). Hittite and Greek Perspectives on Travelling Poets, Texts and Festivals. In Hunter, R. L. and Rutherford, I., eds., Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism, Cambridge, pp. 2345.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2012). The Transmission of Liver Divination from East to West. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici, 54, 143164.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2016). From Hittite to Homer: The Anatolian Background of Ancient Greek Epic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2018). Multiformity in the Song of Ḫedammu: Evidence and Implications. Altorientalische Forschungen, 45(1), 121.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2019). Survival of “Popular” Mythology: From Hittite Mountain Man to Phrygian Mountain Mother. In Blakely, S. and Collins, B. J., eds., Religious Convergence in the Ancient Mediterranean, Atlanta, GA, pp. 203229.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Z. (1996). The Hellenization of Ishtar: Nudity, Fetishism, and the Production of Cultural Differentiation in Ancient Art. Oxford Art Journal, 19(2), 316.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Z. (2013). Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Mesopotamia, London.Google Scholar
Bandt, C. (2008). Der Traktat “Vom Mysterium der Buchstaben”, Kritischer Text mit Einführung, Übersetzung und Anmerkungen, Berlin.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. (2005). Euripide e Orfeo in un papiro fiorentino (PSI XV 1476). In G. Bastianini and A. Casanova, eds., Euripide e i papiri: atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 10-11 giugno 2004, Florence, pp. 227242.Google Scholar
Baxter, T. M. S. (1992). The Cratylus: Plato’s Critique of Naming, Leiden.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. (2010). Etymological Dictionary of Greek, vols. 1–2, Leiden.Google Scholar
Bennett, E. A. (2017). A Study of Babylonian Scholarship Applied in the Exploration of the Meaning of Divine and Sacred Names, as Particularly Exemplified in a Syncretistic Hymn to the Goddess Gula (PhD Thesis), University of London.Google Scholar
Bergomi, M. (2014). Some Considerations on the Presence of the Derveni Allegory in Plato’s Cratylus. Méthexis, 27(1), 215224.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1989). Generaciones de dioses y sucesión interrumpida: el mito hitita de Kumarbi, la Teogonía de Hesíodo y del Papiro de Derveni. Aula Orientalis, 7, 159179.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1992). Una forma embrionaria de reflexión sobre el lenguaje: La etimología de nombres divinos en los órficos. Revista española de lingüística, 22(1), 2554.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1996). La fórmula órfica “Cerrad las puertas, profanos”: Del profano religioso al profano en la materia. ’Ilu. Revista de ciencias de las religiones, 1, 1337.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2002). La théogonie orphique du papyrus de Derveni. Kernos, 15, 91129.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2003). Hieros logos: poesía órfica sobre los dioses, el alma y el más allá, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2004a). Poetae epici Graeci. Testimonia et fragmenta. Pars II. Orphicorum et Orphicis similium testimonia, vol. 1, Munich.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2004b). Textos órficos y filosofía presocrática, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2006). Magoi en el papiro de Derveni: ¿Magos persas, charlatanes u oficiantes órficos? In M. Valverde Sánchez and E. A. Calderón Dorda, eds., KOINÒS LÓGOS. Homenaje al profesor José García López, Murcia, pp. 99109.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2007a). The Derveni Theogony: Many Questions and Some Answers. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 103, 99133.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2007b). Papyrus Derveni. In Poetae epici Graeci. Testimonia et fragmenta. Pars II, vol. 3, Berlin, pp. 169269.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2008). Etimologías, juegos fónicos y gráficos en los textos órficos. In Bernabé, A. and Casadesús, F., eds., Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, vols. 1–2, Madrid, pp. 867896.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2010). El himno a Zeus órfico. Vicisitudes literarias, ideológicas y religiosas. In Bernabé, A., Casadesús, F., and Santamaría, M. A., eds., Orfeo y el orfismo: nuevas perspectivas, Alicante, pp. 6797.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2012). On the Rites Described and Commented Upon in the Derveni Papyrus, Cols. I–VI. Classics@, 5(5). Retrieved October 22, 2022, from https://classics-at.chs.harvard.edu/classics5-bernabe/.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2018a). The Commentary of the Derveni Papyrus: Pre-Socratic Cosmogonies at Work. In Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., ed., The Derveni Papyrus, Leiden, pp. 108125.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2018b). ‘Decoding’ a Literary Text. The Commentary of Derveni. Trends in Classics, 10(2), 338366.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2002). On Eudemus Fr. 150 (Wehrli). In Bodnár, M. I. and Fortenbaugh, W. W., eds., Eudemus of Rhodes, New Brunswick, NJ, pp. 337357.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bidez, J., and Cumont, F. (1938). Les mages hellénisés: Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe d’après la tradition grecque, Paris.Google Scholar
Black, J. A. (1984). Sumerian Grammar in Babylonian Theory, Rome.Google Scholar
Black, J. A., Cunningham, G., Robson, E., and Zolyomi, G. (eds.). (2004). The Literature of Ancient Sumer, Oxford.Google Scholar
Boardman, J. (1980). The Greeks Overseas: Their Early Colonies and Trade, 2nd ed., New York.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. (2016). Variations grecques sur l’origine (mythique) du langage. In Exercices d’histoire des religions: comparaison, rites, mythes et emotions, Leiden, pp. 284311.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J. (1977). Les noms de Marduk, l’ecriture et la “logique” en Mésopotamie ancienne. In de Jong Ellis, M., ed., Essays on the Ancient Near East in Memory of J. Finkelstein, New Haven, CT, pp. 528.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J. (1985). L’epopée de la création ou les hauts-faits de Marduk et son sacre. In Mythes et rites de Babylone, Paris, pp. 113162.Google Scholar
Bouchard, E. (2015). Aphrodite Philommêdês in the Theogony. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 135, 818.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity (R. Nice, trans.), Chicago.Google Scholar
Briceño Guerrero, J. M. (1970). El origen del lenguaje, Caracas.Google Scholar
Brisart, T. (2011). Un art citoyen: recherches sur l’orientalisation des artisans en Grèce proto-archaïque, Brussels.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2003). Sky, Sex and Sun. The Meanings of αἰδοῖος/αἰδοῖον in the Derveni Papyrus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 144, 1929.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2004). Lectura profana y lectura iniciática del mito. Sileno: Variaciones sobre arte y pensamiento, 17, 4453.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2011). Okéanos dans la colonne XXIII du Papyrus de Derveni. In Herrero, M. de Jáuregui, A. I. Jiménez San Cristóbal, E. Luján Martínez, R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., and Torallas Tovar, S., eds., Tracing Orpheus, Berlin, pp. 385392.Google Scholar
Brockliss, W. (2018). Olympian Sound in the Theogony and the Catalogue of Women: Sweet Music and Disorderly Noise. The Classical Journal, 113(2), 129149.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2003). The Scientific Revolution of 700 B.C. In MacDonald, A. A., Twomey, M. W., and Reinink, G. J., eds., Learned Antiquity, Leuven, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Budin, S. L. (2003). The Origin of Aphrodite, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
Budin, S. L. (2004). A Reconsideration of the Aphrodite-Ashtart Syncretism. Numen, 51(2), 95145.Google Scholar
Budin, S. L. (2014). Before Kypris was Aphrodite. In Sugimoto, D. T., ed., Transformation of a Goddess: Ishtar-Astarte-Aphrodite, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1963). Iranisches bei Anaximandros. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 106(2), 97134.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1970). La genèse des choses et des mots: Le papyrus de Derveni entre Anaxagore et Cratyle. Les études philosophiques, 2, 443455.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1992). The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Age, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1999). The Logic of Cosmogony. In Buxton, R., ed., From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, Oxford, pp. 87106.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2003). La via fenicia e la via anatolica: Ideologie e scoperte fra Oriente e Occidente. In Gemelli Marciano, M. L., ed., Kleine Schriften. Orientalia, vol. 2, Göttingen, pp. 252–66.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2004). Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis: Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2008a). El dios solitario. Orfeo, fr. 12 Bernabé, en contexto. In A. Bernabé and F. Casadesús, eds., Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, Madrid, pp. 579589.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2008b). Prehistory of Presocratic Philosophy in an Orientalizing Context. In Curd, P. and Graham, D. W., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1997). Figures of Sexuality and Initiatory Transition in the Derveni Theogony and its Commentary. In A. Laks and G. W. Most, eds., Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford, pp. 6580.Google Scholar
Calderón Felices, J. (1982). Lengua de los dioses, lengua de los hombres. Faventia, 4(1), 533.Google Scholar
Cancik-Kirschbaum, E. C., Kahl, J., and Wagensonner, K. (2018). Erste Philologien Archäologie einer Disziplin vom Tigris bis zum Nil, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. (2006). Metis, el nous, el aire y Zeus en el papiro de Derveni. Faventia, 18(1), 7588.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. (2008). Heráclito y el orfismo. In A. Bernabé and F. Casadesús, eds., Orfeo y la tradición órfica: un reencuentro, Madrid, pp. 10791104.Google Scholar
Casadesús, F. (2011). The Castration of Uranus and its Physical Consequences in the Derveni Papyrus (cols. XIII and XIV) and the First Stoic Philosophers. In Herrero, M. de Jáuregui, A. I. Jiménez San Cristóbal, E. Luján Martínez, R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., and Torallas Tovar, S., eds., Tracing Orpheus, Berlin, pp. 377384.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, A. (1987). Aux sources du Midrash: l’herméneutique babylonienne. Aula Orientalis, 5, 243255.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, A. (2014). Une version sumérienne de la légende d’Adapa (Textes de Tell Haddad X). Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und vorderasiatische Archäologie, 104(1), 141.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, A., and Al-Rawi, F. (1993). New Sumerian Literary Texts from Tell Haddad (Ancient Meturan): A First Survey. Iraq, 55, 91105.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, A., and Jaques, M. (2010). Peut-on comprendre le Silbenvokabular? In Shehata, D., Weiershäuser, F., and Zand, K. V., eds., Von Göttern und Menschen: Beiträge zu Literatur und Geschichte des Alten Orients. Festschrift für Brigitte Groneberg, Leiden, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. (1990). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: histoire des mots, Paris.Google Scholar
Christiansen, B., and Thaler, U. (2012). Ansehenssache: Formen von Prestige in Kulturen des Altertums, Munich.Google Scholar
Chrysanthou, A. (2020). Defining Orphism, Berlin.Google Scholar
Civil, M. (1995). Ancient Mesopotamian Lexicography. Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, 2, 23052314.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1972). The Planktai and Moly: Divine Naming and Knowing in Homer. Hermes, 100(2), 127131.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1974). Demas and Aude: The Nature of Divine Transformation in Homer. Hermes, 102(2), 129136.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1993). The Generation of Monsters in Hesiod. Classical Philology, 88(2), 105116.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2003). Hesiod’s Cosmos, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2006). The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns, 2nd ed., London.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S., and Gilan, A. (2014). The Hittite “Song of Emergence” and the Theogony. Philologus, 158(1), 19.Google Scholar
Cline, D. H. (2020). Athens as a Small World. Journal of Historical Network Research, 4, 3656.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. E. (1974). Balag-Compositions: Sumerian Lamentation Liturgies of the Second and First Millennium B.C., Malibu.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (1999). Hesiod and the Divine Voice of the Muses. Arethusa, 32(3), 241262.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1998). The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cornutus, L. A. (2018). Compendium de Graecae theologiae traditionibus. (Torres Guerra, J. B., ed.), Berlin.Google Scholar
Couto-Ferreira, M. E. (2017). ‘Let Me Be Your Canal’: Some Thoughts on Agricultural Landscape and Female Bodies in Sumero-Akkadian Sources. In Feliu, L., Karahashi, F., and Rubio, G., eds., The First Ninety Years: A Sumerian Celebration in Honor of Miguel Civil, Berlin, pp. 5469.Google Scholar
Crisostomo, C. J., Escobar, E. A., Tanaka, T., and Veldhuis, N. (eds.). (2018). “The Scaffolding of Our Thoughts”: Essays on Assyriology and the History of Science in Honor of Francesca Rochberg, Leiden.Google Scholar
Crisostomo, J. (2019). Translation as Scholarship, Berlin.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2016). Homer’s Allusive Art, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cyrino, M. S. (2012). Aphrodite, New York.Google Scholar
Da Riva, R. (2020). Jealousy in Akkadian Love Literature: Zarpanītu in the Divine Love Lyrics. In S.-W. Hsu and J. Llop-Raduà, eds., The Expression of Emotions in Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, Leiden, pp. 306334.Google Scholar
Dalley, S. (1997). Statues of Marduk and the Date of Enūma eliš. Archiv für Orientforschung, 24, 163–71.Google Scholar
Dalley, S. (ed.). (1998). The Legacy of Mesopotamia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Damascius, (2010). Problems and Solutions Regarding First Principles (S. Ahbel-Rappe, trans.), Oxford.Google Scholar
Danzig, D. (2013). Name Word Play and Marduk’s Fifty Names in Enūma Eliš (Master Thesis), Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
De Zorzi, N. (2011). The Omen Series Šumma izbu: Internal Structure and Hermeneutic Strategies. Kaskal, 8, 4375.Google Scholar
De Zorzi, N. (2014). La serie teratomantica Šumma izbu: testo, tradizione, orizzonti culturali, Padua.Google Scholar
Delitzsch, F. (1896). Das babylonische Weltschöpfungsepos, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Delnero, P. (2012). Memorization and the Transmission of Sumerian Literary Compositions. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 71(2), 189208.Google Scholar
Delnero, P. (2015). Texts and Performance: The Materiality and Function of the Sumerian Liturgical Corpus. In Delnero, P. and Lauinger, J., eds.,Texts and Contexts: The Circulation and Transmission of Cuneiform Texts in Social Space, Berlin, pp. 87117.Google Scholar
Demetriou, D. (2012). Negotiating Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean: The Archaic and Classical Greek Multiethnic Emporia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., Hamonic, G., Charachidzé, G., Malamoud, C., and Severi, C. (1995). La déesse parole: quatre figures de la langue des dieux, Paris.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007). Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. (1925). Das Alphabet in Mystik und Magie, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C., and Kurke, L. (2003). The Cultures Within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dourado-Lopes, A. O. (2019). A Musa Calíope e a beleza do canto em Homero e em Hesíodo. Nuntius Antiquus, 15(1), 1360.Google Scholar
Duplouy, A. (2006). Le prestige des élites: recherches sur les modes de reconnaissance sociale en Grèce entre les Xe et Ve siècles avant J.-C, Paris.Google Scholar
Durand, J.-M. (1994). Enūma Eliš I 76. NABU, 4(100), 91.Google Scholar
Edmonds, III, R. G. (2008). Extra-Ordinary People: Mystai and Magoi, Magicians and Orphics in the Derveni Papyrus. Classical Philology, 103, 1639.Google Scholar
Edmonds, III (2013). Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eisenfeld, H. (2015). Ishtar Rejected: Reading a Mesopotamian Goddess in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite. Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 16(1), 133162.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. S. (1995). The Trouble with “Hairies”. Iraq, 57, 159165.Google Scholar
Elman, Y. (1975). Authoritative Oral Tradition in Neo-Assyrian Scribal Circles. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society, 7, 1932.Google Scholar
Eshleman, K. (2007). Affection and Affiliation: Social Networks and Conversion to Philosophy. The Classical Journal, 103(2), 129140.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. A. (2013). The Poetics of the Catalogue in the Hesiodic Theogony. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 143(2), 293323.Google Scholar
Farber, W. (1977). Beschwörungsrituale an Ištar und Dumuzi: Attī Ištar ša ḫarmaša Dumuzi, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011). The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2007). Note al testo delle colonne II–VII del papiro di Derveni. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 162, 203211.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. (2011). Rites without Frontiers: Magi and Mystae in the Derveni Papyrus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 179, 7183.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. (1986). On the Unity of Orphic and Milesian Thought. The Harvard Theological Review, 79(4), 321335.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. (1989). The Milesian Monistic Doctrine and the Development of Presocratic Thought. Hermes, 117(3), 257270.Google Scholar
Finkelberg, M. (2007). Greek Distrust of Language. In S. La Porta and D. Shulman, eds., The Poetics of Grammar and the Metaphysics of Sound and Sign, Leiden, pp. 8188.Google Scholar
Finn, J. (2017). Much Ado about Marduk: Questioning Discourses of Royalty in First Millennium Mesopotamian Literature, Berlin.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1994). Homer: The Poetry of the Past, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Foster, B. R. (2005). Before the Muses: An Anthology of Akkadian Literature, 3rd ed., Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York. (Original work published 1966.)Google Scholar
Fournier, A. (1946). Les verbes “dire” en grec ancien: exemple de conjugaison supplétive, Paris.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. (2004). Royal Hermeneutics: Observations on the Commentaries from Ashurbanipal’s Libraries at Nineveh. Iraq, 66, 4550.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. (2011). Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries: Origins of Interpretation, Münster.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. (2013). Creation and the Divine Spirit in Babel and Bible: Reflections on mummu in Enūma eliš I 4 and rûah in Genesis 1:2. In D. S. Vanderhooft and A. Winitzer, eds., Literature as Politics, Politics as Literature. Essays on the Ancient Near East in Honor of Peter Machinist, Winona Lake, IN, pp. 97116.Google Scholar
Frahm, E., Jiménez, E., Frazer, M., and Wagensonner, K. (2013). Cuneiform Commentaries Project. Retrieved July 13, 2021, from https://ccp.yale.edu/.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. C. (2002). Musical Syncretism and the Greek Orientalizing Period. In Hickmann, E., Eichmann, R., and Kilmer, A. D., eds., Archäologie früher Klangerzeugung und Tonordnungen, vol. 3, Rahden, pp. 441451.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. C. (2006). Lyre Gods of the Bronze Age Musical Koine. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, 6(1), 3970.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1969). Besprechung: Hesiodi Carmina recensuit Felix Jacoby. Pars I: Theogonia. In Studien zur antiken Literatur und Kunst, Berlin, pp. 81104.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1982). The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D., and Gysembergh, V. (2015). Reading the Liver: Papyrological Texts on Ancient Greek Extispicy, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2012). Akkadian Commentaries from Ancient Mesopotamia and their Relation to Early Hebrew Exegesis. Dead Sea Discoveries, 19(3), 267312.Google Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2015). The Eršema Prayers of the First Millennium BC, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2016a). Akkadian Commentaries and Early Hebrew Exegesis. Retrieved January 13, 2021, from https://ccp.yale.edu/introduction/akkadian-hebrew-exegesis.Google Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2016b). The Exegetical Terminology of Akkadian Commentaries, Leiden.Google Scholar
Gabbay, U. (2019). The Production and Transmission of Sumerian Emesal Litanies in their Historical and Cultic Contexts. Kaskal, 16, 201220.Google Scholar
Gabriel, G. (2014). Enuma elish – Weg zu einer globalen Weltordnung: Pragmatik, Struktur und Semantik des babylonischen “Lieds auf Marduk”, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Gabriel, G.. (2018). Decreeing Fate and Name-Giving in Enūma Eliš: Approaching a Fundamental Mesopotamian Concept with Special Consideration of the Underlying Assumptions and of the Condition of Possibility of Human Knowledge. In Attinger, P., Caigneaux, A., Mittermayer, C., and Novák, M., eds., Text and Image, Proceedings of the 61st Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Geneva and Bern, 22–26 June 2015, Leuven, pp. 163178.Google Scholar
Gadd, C. J. (1937). The Infancy of Man in a Sumerian Legend. Iraq, 4(1), 3334.Google Scholar
Gambarara, D. (1984a). Alle fonti della filosofia del linguaggio: “lingua” e “nomi” nella cultura greca arcaica, Rome.Google Scholar
Gambarara, D. (1984b). Reflexion religieuse et reflexion linguistique aux origines de la philosophie du langage. In Auroux, S., ed., Matériaux pour une histoire des théories linguistiques, Lille, pp. 105114.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, D. (2013). Lexical Semantics from Speculative Etymology to Structuralist Semantics. In Allan, K., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, Oxford, pp. 555570.Google Scholar
Geller, M. J. (1997). The Last Wedge. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 87(1), 4395.Google Scholar
Gemelli-Marciano, M. L. (2017). East and West. In Perilli, L. and Taormina, D. P., eds., Ancient Philosophy: Textual Paths and Historical Explorations, London, pp. 140.Google Scholar
George, A. R. (1992). Babylonian Topographical Texts, Leuven.Google Scholar
George, A. R. (2003). The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts, vols. 1–2, Oxford.Google Scholar
George, A. R. (2009). Babylonian Literary Texts in the Schøyen Collection, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
George, A. R. (2016). Die Kosmogonie des alten Mesopotamien. In Gindhart, M. and Pommerening, T., eds., Anfang und Ende: Vormoderne Szenarien von Weltentstehung und Weltuntergang, Darmstadt, pp. 725.Google Scholar
Gera, D. L. (2003). Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gesche, P. D. (2001). Schulunterricht in Babylonien im ersten Jahrtausend v. Chr, Münster.Google Scholar
Gilan, A. (2015). A Bridge or a Blind Alley? Hittites and Neo Hittites as Cultural Mediators. In Faber, R. and Lichtenberger, A., eds., Ein pluriverses Universum: Zivilisationen und Religionen im antiken Mittelmeerraum, Paderborn, pp. 167189.Google Scholar
Gilan, A.. (2021). “Let Those Important Primeval Deities Listen”. In Kelly, A. and Metcalf, C., eds., Gods and Mortals in Early Greek and Near Eastern Mythology, Cambridge, pp. 1936.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (ed.). (1990). The Poet Hero: Language and Representation in the Odyssey. In The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature, Cambridge, pp. 168.Google Scholar
Goslin, O. (2010). Hesiod’s Typhonomachy and the Ordering of Sound. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 140, 351373.Google Scholar
Groneberg, B. (1997). Lob der Ištar: Gebet und Ritual an die altbabylonische Venusgöttin Tanatti Ištar, Groningen.Google Scholar
Gruppe, O. F. (1841). Über die Theogonie des Hesiod: Ihr Verderbniss und ihre ursprüngliche Gestalt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Guía, M. V. (2013a). Afrodita y los fenicios en el Egeo. Gerión: Revista de historia antigua, 31, 5187.Google Scholar
Guía, M. V.. (2013b). Influencia oriental en la Afrodita griega (Urania): encuentros y desencuentros entre la cultura griega y la oriental. In Caerols, J. J., ed., Religio in labyrintho: encuentros y desencuentros de religiones en sociedades complejas, Madrid, pp. 4761.Google Scholar
Haider, P. W. (2005). Von Baal Zaphon zu Zeus und Typhon. Zum Transfer mythischer Bilder aus dem vorderorientalischen Raum in die archaisch-griechische Welt. In Rollinger, R. and Schretter, M., eds., Von Sumer bis Homer: Festschrift für Manfred Schretter zum 60. Geburtstag am 25. Februar 2004, vol. 60, Münster, pp. 303337.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. (2000). Foam-Born Aphrodite and the Mythology of Transformation. The American Journal of Philology, 121(1), 119.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2000). Pindar’s “Theban” Cosmogony (the First Hymn). Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 44(1), 1940.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2009). Etymologising the Muse. Materiali e Discussioni per l’analisi Dei Testi Classici, 62, 957.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2002). Greek Epic: A Near Eastern Genre? Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 48, 119.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2013). Greece and Mesopotamia: Dialogues in Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2017a). Conflict, Consensus and Closure in Hesiod’s Theogony and Enūma eliš. In Bassino, P., Graziosi, B., and Canevaro, L. G., eds., Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry, Cambridge, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2017b). From Text to Reading in Enūma Eliš. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 69(1), 221246.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. . (2020). Chaldean Interactions. In König, A., Uden, J., and Langlands, R., eds., Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions, Cambridge, pp. 309327.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. . (Forthcoming). The Making of the Chaldeans.Google Scholar
Heidel, A. (1942). The Babylonian Genesis: The Story of the Creation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. (1998). Ulysses’ Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance, Princeton.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1968). Die “Erdmutter” Demeter (P. Derveni und Eurip. Bakch. 275 f.). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 3, 111112.Google Scholar
Henry, M. (1986). The Derveni Commentator as Literary Critic. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 116, 149164.Google Scholar
Hernández, R. M. (2010). Orfeo y los magos: La literatura órfica, la magia y los misterios, Madrid.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. (1953). Anaximander und die Anfänge der Philosophie. Hermes, 81(34), 257277; 385418.Google Scholar
Horky, P. S. (2009). Persian Cosmos and Greek Philosophy: Plato’s Associates and the Zoroastrian Magoi. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 37, 47103.Google Scholar
Huber, P. J. (2007). On the Old Babylonian Understanding of Grammar: A Reexamination of OBGT VI-X. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 59, 117.Google Scholar
Huber, P. J. (2008). The Earliest Comparative Linguists. Chatreššar 2008, 4764.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., and Rutherford, I. (eds.). (2009). Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hurowitz, V. A. (2000). Alliterative Allusions, Rebus Writing, and Paronomastic Punishment: Some Aspects of Word Play in Akkadian Literature. In Noegel, S. B., ed., Puns and Pundits: Word Play in the Hebrew Bible and Ancient Near Eastern Literature, Bethesda, MD, pp. 6387.Google Scholar
Izre’el, S. (2001). Adapa and the South Wind: Language Has the Power of Life and Death, Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. (2010). Father-Daughter Dynamics in the Iliad: The Role of Aphrodite in Defining Zeus’ Regime. In Smith, A. C. and Pickup, S., eds., Brill’s Companion to Aphrodite, Leiden, pp. 151163.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. (1976). The Treasures of Darkness, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1926). Hesiodstudien zur Theogonie. Hermes, 61(2), 157191.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1987). Why “Mama” and “Papa”? In Selected Writings, vol. 1, Berlin, pp. 538545.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1997). The Physicist as Hierophant: Aristophanes, Socrates and the Authorship of the Derveni Papyrus. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 118, 6194.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2002). The Derveni Papyrus: An Interim Text. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 141, 162.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2016). Parmenides in the Derveni Papyrus: New Images for a New Edition. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 200, 323.Google Scholar
Jean, C. (2006). La magie néo-assyrienne en contexte: recherches sur le métier d’exorciste et le concept d’āšipūtu, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Jones, A., and Steele, J. (2011). A New Discovery of a Component of Greek Astrology in Babylonian Tablets: The “Terms.” Retrieved May 16, 2020, from http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/1/.Google Scholar
Kämmerer, T. R., and Metzler, K. A. (2012). Das babylonische Weltschöpfungsepos Enūma elîs, Münster.Google Scholar
Kanavou, N. (2015). The Names of Homeric Heroes: Problems and Interpretations, Berlin.Google Scholar
Katz, D. (2011). Reconstructing Babylon: Recycling Mythological Traditions toward a New Theology. In Cancik-Kirschbaum, E., Ess, M. van, and Marzahn, J., eds., Babylon: Wissenskultur in Orient und Okzident, vol. 1, Berlin, pp. 123134.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (2018). The Prehistory and Analogues of Hesiod’s Poetry. In Loney, A. and Scully, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford, pp. 6177.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2021). Sexing and Gendering the Succession Myth in Hesiod and the Ancient Near East. In Kelly, A. and Metcalf, C., eds., Gods and Mortals in Early Greek and Near Eastern Mythology, Cambridge, pp. 276291.Google Scholar
Kerschensteiner, J. (1945). Platon und der Orient, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
King, L. W. (1902). The Seven Tablets of Creation: Or, the Babylonian and Assyrian Legends Concerning the Creation of the World and of Mankind, vols. 1–2, London.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995). Meetings with Magi: Iranian Themes among the Greeks, from Xanthus of Lydia to Plato’s Academy. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 5(2), 173210.Google Scholar
Kiriatzi, E., and Knappett, C. (eds.). (2016). Human Mobility and Technological Transfer in the Prehistoric Mediterranean, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knapp, A. B. (2008). Prehistoric and Protohistoric Cyprus: Identity, Insularity, and Connectivity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Koch-Westenholz, U. (2000). Babylonian Liver Omens: The Chapters Manzāzu, Padānu and Pān Tākalti of the Babylonian Extispicy Series Mainly from Aššurbanipal’s Library, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Koning, H. (2010). Hesiod, The Other Poet: Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon, Leiden.Google Scholar
Koning, H. (2018). The Hesiodic Question. In Loney, A. and Scully, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford, pp. 1729.Google Scholar
Kotwick, M. E. (2017). Der Papyrus von Derveni: Griechisch-Deutsch, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kotwick, M. E. (2019a). ΑΝΟΗΤΟΙ ΑΜΥΗΤΟΙ: Allegorical Interpretation in the Derveni Papyrus and Plato’s Gorgias. Classical Philology, 114(2), 173196.Google Scholar
Kotwick, M. E. (2019b). Aphrodite’s Cosmic Power: Empedocles in the Derveni Papyrus. In C. Vassallo, ed., Presocratics and Papyrological Tradition: A Philosophical Reappraisal of the Sources. Proceedings of the International Workshop Held at the University of Trier (22–24 September 2016), vol. 10, Berlin, pp. 251269.Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. M., and Tsantsanoglou, K. (eds.). (2006). The Derveni Papyrus, Florence.Google Scholar
Krebernik, M. (1989). Mamma, Mammi; Mammītum. In D. O. Edzard, ed., Reallexikon der Assyriologie, vol. 7, Berlin, pp. 330311.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and Necessity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (2013). Reference and Existence, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. (2013). Les routes de la voix: l’antiquité grecque et le mystère de la voix, Paris.Google Scholar
Laks, A. (1997). Between Religion and Philosophy: The Function of Allegory in the “Derveni Papyrus”. Phronesis, 42(2), 121142.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Most, G. W. (1997). A Provisional Translation of the Derveni Papyrus. In Laks, A. and Most, G. W., eds., Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford, pp. 922.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1956). An Address of Marduk to Demons. Archiv für Orientforschung, 17, 310321.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1960). An Address of Marduk to Demons. New Fragments. Archiv für Orientforschung, 19, 114119.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1962). A Catalogue of Texts and Authors. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 16(3), 5977.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1975a). The Cosmology of Sumer and Babylon. In Blacker, C., Loewe, M., and Plumley, J. M., eds., Ancient Cosmologies, London, pp. 4363.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1975b). The Historical Development of the Mesopotamian Pantheon: A Study in Sophisticated Polytheism. In Goedicke, H. and Roberts, J. J. M., eds., Unity and Diversity: Essays in the History, Literature, and Religion of the Ancient Near East, Baltimore, pp. 191200.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1982). The Hymn to the Queen of Nippur. In Stol, V., van Driem, G. L., and Krispijn, T. J. H., eds., Zikir šumim: Assyriological Studies Presented to F. R. Kraus on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, Leiden, pp. 173219.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1984). Studies in Marduk. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 47(1), 19.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1985). The Pair Lahmu-Lahamu in Cosmology. Orientalia N.S., 54(1–2), 189202.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1996). Babylonian Wisdom Literature, Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1998). Technical Terminology for Creation in the Ancient Near East. In J. Prosecky, ed., Intellectual Life of the Ancient Near East: Papers Presented at the 43rd Rencontre Assyriologique International, Prague, July 1–5, 1996, Prague, pp. 189194.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (1999). Babylonian Linguistics. In Van Lerberghe, K., ed., Languages and Cultures in Contact: At the Crossroads of Civilizations in the Syro-Mesopotamian Realm; Proceedings of the 42th [sic] RAI, Leuven, pp. 219231.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (2003). A Syncretistic Hymn to Ištar. Archiv für Orientforschung, 50, 2127.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (2008). Mesopotamian Creation Stories. In Geller, M. J. and Schipper, M., eds., Imagining Creation, Leiden, pp. 1560.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. (2012). Babylonian Creation Myths, Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G., Millard, A. R., and Civil, M. (1969). Atra-ḫasīs: The Babylonian Story of the Flood, Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar
Lamedica, A. (1991). La terminologia critico-letteraria dal Papiro di Derveni ai corpora scoliografici. In P. Radici Colace and M. Caccamo Caltabiano, eds., Atti del I seminario di studi sui lessici tecnici greci e latini, Messina, pp. 8391.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. (1933). Die angebliche babylonische Notenschrift. Aus Fünf Jahrtausenden Morgenländischer Kultur, Festschrift Max Freiherrn von Oppenheim zum 70. Geburtstage gewidmet von Freunden und Mitarbeitern, Berlin, pp. 170178.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B. (1959). Zum Silbenalphabet B. In M. Cig, H. Kizilyay, and B. Landsberger, eds., Eski Babil zamanına ait Nippur menşeli iki okul kitabı = Zwei altbabylonische Schulbücher aus Nippur, Ankara.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. (2008). Travelling Heroes: Greeks and their Myths in the Epic Age of Homer, London.Google Scholar
Lange, A., and Pleše, Z. (2011). The Qumran Pesharim and the Derveni Papyrus: Transpositional Hermeneutics in Ancient Jewish and Ancient Greek Commentaries. In Lange, A., Tov, E., and Weigold, M., eds., The Dead Sea Scrolls in Context, 2 vols., Leiden, pp. 895922.Google Scholar
Lange, A., and Pleše, Z. (2012). Transpositional Hermeneutics. Journal of Ancient Judaism, 3(1), 1567.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. (2018). Eastern Myths for Western Lies: Allusions to Near Eastern Mythology in Homer’s Iliad. Mnemosyne, 71(6), 895919.Google Scholar
Leclerc, M.-C. (1993). La parole chez Hésiode: à la recherche de l’harmonie perdue, Paris.Google Scholar
Leick, G. (2003). Sex and Eroticism in Mesopotamian Literature, London.Google Scholar
Lenzi, A. (2008). Secrecy and the Gods: Secret Knowledge in Ancient Mesopotamia and Biblical Israel, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lenzi, A. (2016). Mesopotamian Scholarship: Kassite to Late Babylonian Periods. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History, 2(2), 145201.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. (2018). Apples and Oranges: Explorations in, on, and with Comparison, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lisman, J. J. W. (2013). Cosmogony, Theogony and Anthropogeny in Sumerian Texts, Münster.Google Scholar
Litke, R. L. (1998). A Reconstruction of the Assyro-Babylonian God-Lists, AN: A-nu-um and AN: Anu šá amēli, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Livingstone, A. (1986). Mystical and Mythological Explanatory Works of Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars, Oxford.Google Scholar
Livingstone, A. (1989). Court Poetry and Literary Miscellanea, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1989). The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science, Berkeley.Google Scholar
López-Ruiz, C. (2006). Some Oriental Elements in Hesiod and the Orphic Cosmogonies. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, 6(1), 71104.Google Scholar
López-Ruiz, C. (2010). When the Gods Were Born: Greek Cosmogonies and the Near East, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
López-Ruiz, C. (2021). Siting the Gods: Narrative, Cult, and Hybrid Communities in the Iron Age Mediterranean. In Kelly, A. and Metcalf, C., eds., Gods and Mortals in Early Greek and Near Eastern Mythology, Cambridge, pp. 3757.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Manetti, G. (1993). Theories of the Sign in Classical Antiquity, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983). Cratylus 402 a–c: Plato or Hippias? In Rossetti, L., ed., Atti del Symposium Heracliteum, vol. 1, Rome, pp. 4355.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1985). Aristotle and Others on Thales, or the Beginnings of Natural Philosophy (With Some Remarks on Xenophanes). Mnemosyne, 38(1–2), 109129.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. (1999). Das Wort im Worte: Orthographie und Etymologie als hermeneutische Verfahren babylonischer Gelehrter. In Most, G. W., ed., Commentaries – Kommentare, Göttingen, pp. 118.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. (2003). Bildhafte Orthographie in der assyrisch-babylonischen Keilschrift. In Assmann, A. and Assmann, J., eds., Hieroglyphen: Stationen einer anderen abendländischen Grammatologie, Munich, pp. 3864.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. (2011). Neues zu den “Graeco-Babyloniaca”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 81(1–2), 87107.Google Scholar
Maul, S. M. (2018). The Art of Divination in the Ancient Near East: Reading the Signs of Heaven and Earth (B. McNeil and A. J. Edmonds, trans.), Waco, TX.Google Scholar
Megino Rodríguez, C. (2019). Daimons in the Derveni Papyrus and in Early Stoicism. In Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., ed., The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing Ancient Mysteries, Leiden, pp. 3044.Google Scholar
Meisner, D. A. (2018). Orphic Tradition and the Birth of the Gods, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mendoza, J. (2011). Ζεὺς μοῦνος: Philosophical Monism and Mythological Monism (OF 12). In Herrero, M. de Jáuregui, A. I. Jiménez San Cristóbal, E. Luján Martínez, R., Hernández, R. M., Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., and Torallas Tovar, S., eds., Tracing Orpheus, Berlin, pp. 2934.Google Scholar
Metcalf, C. (2015). The Gods Rich in Praise: Early Greek and Mesopotamian Religious Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. (1990). Presence at the Creation. In Abusch, T., Huehnergard, J., and Steinkeller, P., eds., Lingering over Words: Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Literature in Honor of William L. Moran, Leiden, pp. 381396.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1992). The Parasol: An Oriental Status-Symbol in Late Archaic and Classical Athens. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 112, 91105.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1997). Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century B.C.: A Study in Cultural Receptivity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1999). Reexamining Transvestism in Archaic and Classical Athens: The Zewadski Stamnos. American Journal of Archaeology, 103(2), 223253.Google Scholar
Morand, A.-F. (2010). Etymologies of Divine Names in Orphic Texts. In Bernabé, A., Casadesús, F., and Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., eds., Orfeo y el orfismo: nuevas perspectivas, Alicante, pp. 157176.Google Scholar
Moyer, I. S. (2011). Egypt and the Limits of Hellenism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Myerston, J. (2013). Divine Names in the Derveni Papyrus and Mesopotamian Hermeneutics. Trends in Classics, 5(1), 74110.Google Scholar
Myerston, J. (2022). Variations on Violence in Akkadian and Greek Succession Myths. Trends in Classics, 14(1), 135.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1994). The Name of Achilles: Questions of Etymology and “Folk-Etymology”. Illinois Classical Studies, 19, 39.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (2009). Hesiod and the Ancient Biographical Traditions. In F. Montanari, C. Tsagalis, and A. Rengakos, eds., Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, Leiden, pp. 271311.Google Scholar
Niemeier, W.-D. (2001). Archaic Greeks in the Orient: Textual and Archaeological Evidence. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 322, 1132.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2009a). The Philosophers in Archaic Greek Culture. In Shapiro, H. A. and Shapiro, H. A., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, Cambridge, pp. 169198.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2009b). Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in its Cultural Context, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Noegel, S. B. (2007). Nocturnal Ciphers: The Allusive Language of Dreams in the Ancient Near East, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1997). Cosmology as Initiation vs. the Critique of Orphic Mysteries. In A. Laks and G. W. Most, eds., Studies in the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford, pp. 4054.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1998). Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule, Princeton.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1999). True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. L. (1964). Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization, Chicago.Google Scholar
Oshima, T. (2011). Babylonian Prayers to Marduk, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Oshima, T. (2014). Babylonian Poems of Pious Sufferers: Ludlul Bel Nemeqi and the Babylonian Theodicy, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2018). Greek Gods Abroad: Names, Natures, and Transformations, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. (1995). The Assyrian Cabinet. In W. Von Soden, O. Loretz, and M. Dietrich, eds., Vom Alten Orient zum Alten Testament: Festschrift für Wolfram Freiherrn von Soden zum 85. Geburtstag am 19. Juni 1993, Kevelaer, pp. 379401.Google Scholar
Parpola, S. (1997). Assyrian Prophecies, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Passmore, O. (2018). Thaumastic Acoustics. Mnemosyne, 71(5), 733749.Google Scholar
Pedersén, O. (1998). Archives and Libraries in the Ancient Near East, 1500–300 B.C., Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
Peradotto, J. (1990). Man in the Middle Voice: Name and Narration in the Odyssey, Princeton.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. (2014). Bilinguals in Late Mesopotamian Scholarship. Retrieved January 16, 2021, from http://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/blms/.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Piano, V. (2010). “ … e quella profettizzò dall’antro”. Mitologia e cosmologia di Notte nel papiro di Derveni. Atti e memorie dell’Accademia Toscana di Scienze e Lettere “La Colombaria”, 75, 1148.Google Scholar
Piano, V. (2016). Il Papiro di Derveni tra religione e filosofia, Florence.Google Scholar
Piano, V. (2019). Some Textual Issues on Column III (ed. Piano). In Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., ed., The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing Ancient Mysteries, Leiden, pp. 1929.Google Scholar
Picchioni, S. A. (1981). Il poemetto di Adapa, Budapest.Google Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, V. (1994). L’Aphrodite grecque: contribution à l’étude de ses cultes et de sa personnalité dans le panthéon archaïque et classique, Athens and Liège.Google Scholar
Porter, B. (2000). One God or Many? A Brief Introduction to a Complex Problem. In One God or Many? Concepts of Divinity in the Ancient World, Chebeague Island, ME, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Potts, D. T. (2018). The Carian Villages. Retrieved August 5, 2019, from https://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlb/2018/cdlb2018_002.html.Google Scholar
Pribbenow, S. (2002). Meronymic Relationships: From Classical Mereology to Complex Part-Whole Relations. In Green, R., Bean, C. A., and Myaeng, S. H., eds., The Semantics of Relationships, Dordrecht, pp. 3550.Google Scholar
Prodi, E. E. (2018). Text as Paratext: Pindar, Sappho, and Alexandrian Editions. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 57(3), 547582.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1977). Hesiod and the Language of Poetry, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1980). The Language of the Muses. In Aycock, W. M. and Klein, T. M., eds., Classical Mythology in Twentieth-Century Thought and Literature, Lubbox, TX, pp. 163186.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (2007). Inno alle Muse: Esiodo, Teogonia, 1–115, Pisa.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of “Meaning”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, 131193.Google Scholar
Rangos, S. (2007). Latent Meaning and Manifest Content in the Derveni Papyrus. Rhizai: Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 4(1), 3575.Google Scholar
Rank, L. P. (1951). Etymologiseering en verwante verschijnselen bij Homerus, Assen.Google Scholar
Rebay-Salisbury, K., Brysbaert, A., and Foxhall, L. (eds.). (2014). Knowledge Networks and Craft Traditions in the Ancient World: Material Crossovers, New York.Google Scholar
Reiner, E., Johnson, J. H., and Civil, M. (2014). Linguistics in the Ancient Near East. In Lepschy, G., ed., History of Linguistics Volume I: The Eastern Traditions of Linguistics, London, pp. 6196.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1974). The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, Oxford.Google Scholar
Risch, E. (1947). Namensdeutungen und Worterklärungen bei den ältesten griechischen Dichtern. In Eumusia. Festgabe für E. Howald zum 60. Geburtstag, Zurich, pp. 7291.Google Scholar
Robson, E. (2001). The Tablet House: A Scribal School in Old Babylonian Nippur. Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale, 95(1), 3966.Google Scholar
Robson, E. (2008). Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: A Social History, Princeton.Google Scholar
Robson, E. (2019). Ancient Knowledge Networks: A Social Geography of Cuneiform Scholarship in First-Millennium Assyria and Babylonia, London.Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. (2004). The Heavenly Writing: Divination, Horoscopy, and Astronomy in Mesopotamian Culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rochberg, F. (2017). Before Nature: Cuneiform Knowledge and the History of Science, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, C. M. (2018). Daimons in the Derveni Papyrus and in Early Stoicism. In Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., ed., The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing Ancient Mysteries, Leiden, pp. 3044.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. (2006a). The Eastern Mediterranean and Beyond: The Relations between the Worlds of the “Greek” and “Non-Greek” Civilizations. In Kinzl, K. H., ed., A Companion to the Classical Greek World, Malden, MA, pp. 197226.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. (2006b). “Yauna takabara” und “maginnata” tragende “Ionier”: zum Problem der “griechischen” Thronträgerfiguren in Naqsch-i Rustam und Persepolis. In Rollinger, R. and Truschnegg, B., eds., Altertum und Mittelmeerraum: die antike Welt diesseits und jenseits der Levante: Festschrift für Peter W. Haider zum 60. Geburtstag, Stuttgart, pp. 365400.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. (2007). Zu Herkunft und Hintergrund der in altorientalischen Texten genannten “Griechen”. In Rollinger, R., Luther, A., and Wiesehöfer, J., eds., Kommunikation, Raum und Wahrnehmung in der Alten Welt, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 259330.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. (2018). Between Deportation and Recruitment: Craftsmen and Specialists from the West in Ancient Near Eastern Empires (from Neo-Assyrian Times Through Alexander III). In Woytek, B., ed., Infrastructure and Distribution in Ancient Economie, Vienna, pp. 425444.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R., and Korenjak, M. (2001). Addikritushu: Ein namentlich genannter Grieche aus der Zeit Asarhaddons. Altorientalische Forschungen, 28, 372384.Google Scholar
Rubio, G. (2011). Gods and Scholars: Mapping the Pantheon in Early Mesopotamia. In Pongratz-Leisten, B., ed., Reconsidering the Concept of Revolutionary Monotheism, Winona Lake, IN, pp. 87112.Google Scholar
Russell, J. R. (2001). The Magi in the Derveni Papyrus. Nāme-Ye Irān Bāstān: The International Journal of Ancient Iranian Studies, 1(1), 4959.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. S. (2014). Unlocking the Orphic Doors: Interpretation of Poetry in the Derveni Papyrus between Pre-Socratics and Alexandrians. In Papadopoulou, I. and Muellner, L., eds., Poetry as Initiation: The Center for Hellenic Studies Symposium on the Derveni Papyrus, Washington, DC. Retrieved October 22, 2020 from https://chs.harvard.edu/chapter/chapter-7-jeffrey-rusten-unlocking-the-orphic-doors-interpretation-of-poetry-in-the-derveni-papryus-between-presocratics-and-alexandrians/.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2009). Hesiod and the Literary Traditions of the Near East. In Montanari, F., Tsagalis, C., and Rengakos, A., eds., Brill’s Companion to Hesiod, Leiden, pp. 935.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2018). Kingship in Heaven in Anatolia, Syria and Greece. In L. G. Audley-Miller and B. Dignas, eds., Wandering Myths: Transcultural Uses of Myth in the Ancient World, Berlin, pp. 322.Google Scholar
Sanders, S. (2017). From Adapa to Enoch, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Santamaría Álvarez, M. A. (2016). A Phallus Hard to Swallow: The Meaning of AIΔOIOΣ/-ON in the Derveni Papyrus. Classical Philology, 111(2), 139164.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. (1966). Hesiods Theogonie: Eine unitarische Analyse, Vienna.Google Scholar
Scully, S. (2016). Hesiod’s Theogony: From Near Eastern Creation Myths to Paradise Lost, Oxford.Google Scholar
Scully, S. (2017). The Theogony and the Enuma Elish: City-State Creation Myths. In Halpern, B. and Sacks, K., eds., Cultural Contact and Appropriation in the Axial-Age Mediterranean World: A Periplos, Leiden, pp. 3859.Google Scholar
Scully, S. (2018). Hesiodic Poetics. In Loney, A. and Scully, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Hesiod, Oxford, pp. 8193.Google Scholar
Seri, A. (2006). The Fifty Names of Marduk in Enūma eliš. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 126(4), 507519.Google Scholar
Seri, A. (2012). The Role of Creation in Enūma eliš. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions, 12(1), 429.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (1997). The Greek Tradition. In van Bekkum, W., Sluiter, I., Houben, J., and Versteegh, K., eds., The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions, vol. 82, Amsterdam, pp. 149224.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (2015). Ancient Etymology: A Tool for Thinking. In Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A., eds., Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, Leiden, pp. 896922.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (2008). God in Translation: Deities in Cross-Cultural Discourse in the Biblical World, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, W. (1982). Der Aufstieg Marduks: die Stellung Marduks in der babylonischen Religion des zweiten Jahrtausends v. Chr., Kevelaer.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. (1952). The Homeric Etymology of the Name Odysseus. Classical Philology, 47(4), 209213.Google Scholar
Steele, J. M. (2006). Greek Influence on Babylonian Astronomy? Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 6(3), 153160.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. (2019). Between Greece and Babylonia: Hellenistic Intellectual History in Cross-Cultural Perspective, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stolper, M. W. (1987). Belšunu the Satrap. In Reiner, E. and Rochberg, F., eds., Language, Literature and History: Philological and Historical Studies Presented to Erica Reiner, New Haven, CT, pp. 389402.Google Scholar
Stolper, M. W. (1995). The Babylonian Enterprise of Belesys. Pallas, 43, 217238.Google Scholar
Streck, M. (1995). Mum(m)u. In Reallexikon der Assyriologie, vol. 8, Berlin, pp. 415416.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G. (2014). The Mystery of the Greek Letters: A Byzantine Kabbalah? Historia Religionum, 6(6), 3544.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. (2004). Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts, Princeton.Google Scholar
Sugimoto, D. T. (2014). Transformation of a Goddess: Ishtar-Astarte-Aphrodite, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Suter, A. (1991). Language of Gods and Language of Men: The Case of Paris/Alexandros. Lexis. Poetica, retorica e comunicazione nella tradizione classica, 7, 1325.Google Scholar
Talon, P. (2001). Enūma Eliš and the Transmission of Babylonian Cosmology to the West. In Whiting, R. M., ed., Mythology and Mythologies. Methodological Approaches to Intercultural Influences. Proceedings of the Second Annual Symposium of the Assyrian and Babylonian Intellectual Heritage Project. Held in Paris, France, October 4–7, 1999, Helsinki, pp. 265277.Google Scholar
Tenney, J. S. (2016). The Elevation of Marduk Revisited: Festivals and Sacrifices at Nippur During the High Kassite Period. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 68, 153180.Google Scholar
Tortorelli Ghidini, M. (2019). Aphrodite Urania and Uranus Euphronides in the Derveni Papyrus: A Semantic Genealogy. In Santamaría Álvarez, M. A., ed., The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing Ancient Mysteries, Leiden, pp. 143149.Google Scholar
Tsitsibakou-Vasalos, E. (2003). Aphrodite in Homer and the Homeric Hymns: Poetic Etymology. In Nifadopoulos, C., ed., Etymologia: Studies in Ancient Etymology: Proceedings of the Cambridge Conference on Ancient Etymology, 25–27 September 2000, Münster, pp. 119129.Google Scholar
Tsitsibakou-Vasalos, E. (2007). Ancient Poetic Etymology: The Pelopids: Fathers and Sons, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ulf, C. (2014). Eine Typologie von kulturellen Kontaktzonen – oder: Rethinking Cultural Contacts auf dem Prüfstand. In Rollinger, R. and Schnegg, K., eds., Kulturkontakte in Antiken Welten: Vom Denkmodell zum Fallbeispiel, Leuven, pp. 469504.Google Scholar
van de Mieroop, M. (2015). Philosophy before the Greeks: The Pursuit of Truth in Ancient Babylonia, Princeton.Google Scholar
van de Mieroop, M. (2018a). Theses on Babylonian Philosophy. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History, 5(1/2), 1539.Google Scholar
van de Mieroop, M. (2018b). What Is the Point of the Babylonian Creation Myth? In Fink, S. and Rollinger, R., eds., Conceptualizing the Past, Present and Future, Münster, pp. 381392.Google Scholar
van Dongen, E. (2010). Studying External Stimuli to the Development of the Ancient Aegean the ‘Kingship in Heaven’-Theme from Kumarbi to Kronos Via Anatolia (PhD Dissertation), UCL, London. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/817439/.Google Scholar
van Dongen, E. (2011). The “Kingship in Heaven”-Theme of the Hesiodic Theogony: Origin, Function, Composition. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 51(2), 180201.Google Scholar
Vanstiphout, H. L. J. (1979). How Did They Learn Sumerian? Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 31(2), 118126.Google Scholar
Vanstiphout, H. L. J. (1995). Memory and Literacy in Ancient Western Asia. Civilizations of the Ancient Near East, 4, 21812196.Google Scholar
Veldhuis, N. (1997). Elementary Education at Nippur (PhD Dissertation), University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Veldhuis, N. (2014). History of the Cuneiform Lexical Tradition, Münster.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2020). Hesiod’s Verbal Craft: Studies in Hesiod’s Conception of Language and its Ancient Reception, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1982). The Origins of Greek Thought, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Viano, M. (2021). Babylonian Hermeneutics and Heraclitus. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 80(2), 231244.Google Scholar
von Soden, W., and Oelsner, J. (1991). Ein spät-altbabylonisches pārum-Preislied für Ištar. Orientalia, 60(4), 339343.Google Scholar
Voutsaki, S. (1997). The Creation of Value and Prestige in the Aegean Late Bronze Age. Journal of European Archaeology, 5(2), 3452.Google Scholar
Waerzeggers, C. (2010). Babylonians in Susa. The Travels of Babylonian Businessmen to Susa Reconsidered. In Rollinger, R. and Jacobs, B., eds., Der Achämenidenhof. Akten des 2. Internationalen Colloquiums zum Thema“Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen”, Wiesbaden, pp. 777813.Google Scholar
Walcot, P. (1966). Hesiod and the Near East, Cardiff.Google Scholar
Walker, C., and Dick, M. B. (1999). The Induction of the Cult Image in Ancient Mesopotamia. In Dick, M. B., ed., Born in Heaven, Made on Earth: The Making of the Cult Image in the Ancient Near East, Leiden, pp. 55117.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1970). Language of Gods and Language of Men: Remarks on Some Indo- European Metalinguistic Traditions. In Puhvel, J., ed., Myth and Law Among the Indo-Europeans: Studies in Indo-European Comparative Mythology, Berkeley, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Weeden, M. (2021). The Scholar and the Poet. In Kelly, A. and Metcalf, C., eds., Gods and Mortals in Early Greek and Near Eastern Mythology, Cambridge, pp. 80106.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1966). Hesiod. Theogony, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1971). Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1983). The Orphic Poems, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1997a). The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth, Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1997b). Hocus-Pocus in East and West. Theogony, Ritual and the Tradition of Esoteric Commentary. In Laks, A. and Most, G. W., eds., Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, Oxford, pp. 8190.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003). Homeric Hymns. Homeric Apocrypha. Lives of Homer, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Westenholz, A. (2007). The Graeco-Babyloniaca Once Again. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie, 97(2), 262313.Google Scholar
Wiggermann, F. A. M. (1992). Mesopotamian Protective Spirits: The Ritual Texts, Groningen.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2003). The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek, Oxford.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2007). Demeter, Gê, and the Indo-European Word(s) for “Earth”. Historische Sprachforschung, 120, 169194.Google Scholar
Winitzer, A. (2011). Writing and Mesopotamian Divination: The Case of Alternative Interpretation. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 63, 7794.Google Scholar
Woods, C. (n.d.). Linguistics in the Ancient Near East. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Yasumura, N. (2013). Challenges to the Power of Zeus in Early Greek Poetry, London.Google Scholar
Zaccagnini, C. (1983). Patterns of Mobility among Ancient Near Eastern Craftsmen. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 42(4), 245264.Google Scholar
Zgoll, A. (2004). Die Kunst des Betens: Form und Funktion, Theologie und Psychagogik in Babylonisch-Assyrischen Handerhebungsgebeten an Ischtar, Münster.Google Scholar
Ziemann, M. (2019). Mercenary Communities in the Near East and their Contribution to an East Mediterranean Literary Koine. Aula Orientalis, 37(1), 173196.Google Scholar
Ziemann, M. (2020). The Politics of Beginnings: Hesiod and the Assyrian Ideological Appropriation of Enuma Eliš. Archiv für Religionsgeschichte, 21 –22(1), 345370.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacobo Myerston, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Language and Cosmos in Greece and Mesopotamia
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289962.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacobo Myerston, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Language and Cosmos in Greece and Mesopotamia
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289962.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jacobo Myerston, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Language and Cosmos in Greece and Mesopotamia
  • Online publication: 16 May 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009289962.007
Available formats
×