Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:11:49.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Carbon Signatures of Development Patterns along a Gradient of Urbanization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

By
Marina Alberti  and
Lucy R. Hutyra
Edited by
Daniel G. Brown ,
Derek T. Robinson ,
Nancy H. F. French  and
Bradley C. Reed
Daniel G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Derek T. Robinson
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo, Ontario
Nancy H. F. French
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
Bradley C. Reed
Affiliation:
United States Geological Survey, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Earth's urban population has increased dramatically over the past century, from 224 million in 1900 to 2.9 billion in 2000 (United Nations [UN] 2004). Currently, more than 50 percent of the world's population lives in urban areas (3.5 billion), and it is expected that this proportion will reach nearly 70 percent (6.3 billion) in 2050 (UN 2009). Although urbanized areas cover only approximately 1 to 6 percent of Earth's surface, they are major determinants of environmental change well beyond their city boundaries (Alberti et al. 2003; Grimm et al. 2008; Schneider, Friedl, and Potere 2009). Urbanization affects the Earth's ecosystems by changing the landscape, altering biophysical processes and habitat, and modifying major biogeochemical cycles (Grimm et al. 2000, Picket et al. 2001, Alberti et al. 2003, Foley et al. 2005). The expanding urban population will place increasing demand on both the productive and assimilative capacities of ecosystems (Folke et al. 1997; Luck et al. 2001).

Advancing the study of coupled human-natural systems in urbanizing regions requires understanding the underlying mechanisms linking patterns of urbanization to ecosystem function. Scholars of urban ecology hypothesize that the pattern of urbanization (i.e., clustered vs. dispersed development) will take in the future will determine to a great extent its impacts on ecosystems both locally and globally. However, empirical studies linking urbanization patterns to ecosystem function in support of such a hypothesis are limited. Direct measurements of the effects of different patterns on ecological processes are rare. For example, studies that link densities of metropolitan areas to their carbon (C) footprints rely on estimates of C emissions derived from predicted vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Understanding how patterns of urbanization affect C budgets requires testing hypotheses through direct observations in several urban areas across diverse environmental and socioeconomic settings. It also requires a robust comparative framework and common metrics and field-study protocols to conduct research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Land Use and the Carbon Cycle
Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy
 , pp. 305 - 328
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, M. 1999. Urban patterns and environmental performance: What do we know?Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, M. 2008. Advances in urban ecology: Integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, M., and Hutyra, L.R. 2010. Detecting carbon signatures of development patterns across a gradient of urbanization: Linking observations, models, and scenarios. In Proceedings of the Fifth Urban Research Symposium 2009: Cities and climate change: Responding to an urgent agenda, 1:1–12.Google Scholar
Alberti, M., Marzluff, J.M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., and Zumbrunnen, C. 2003. Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. BioScience, 53:1169–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, M., Weeks, R., and Coe, S. 2004a. Urban land-cover change analysis in Central Puget Sound. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70:1043–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, M., Weeks, R., Hepinstall, J., Russell, C., Coe, S., and Gustafson, B. 2004b. 2002. Land-cover analysis for the greater Puget Sound region. Puget Sound Regional Synthesis Model final report.
Birdsey, R.A., and Heath, L.S. 1995. Carbon changes in U.S. forests. In Climate change and the productivity of America's forests, ed. Joyce, L.A.. Gen. tech. rep. RM-271. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service General, pp. 56–70.Google Scholar
Brown, M., Southworth, F., and Sarzynski, A. 2008. Shrinking the carbon footprint of metropolitan America. Blueprint for American prosperity: Unleashing the potential of a metropolitan nation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Buyantuyev, A., and Wu, J. 2009. Urbanization alters spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem primary production: A case study of the Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. Journal of Arid Environments, 73:512–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadell, J., Dickinson, R., Hibbard, K., Raupach, M., and Young, O. 2003. Global Carbon Project: Science framework and implementation. Earth System Science Partnership rep. no. 1, Canberra, Australia.
Cervero, R., and Kockelman, K. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research D, 2(3):199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cervero, R., and Wu, K.L. 1997. Polycentrism, commuting, and residential location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A, 29:865–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Churkina, G., Brown, D.G., and Keoleian, G. 2010. Carbon stored in human settlements: The conterminous United States. Global Change Biology, 16:135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutts, A.M., Beringer, J., and Tapper, N.J. 2007. Characteristics influencing the variability of urban CO2 fluxes in Melbourne, Australia. Atmospheric Environment, 41:51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EIA. 2008. Annual energy review. Rep. no. DOE/EIA-0384. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
Evans, T.P., York, A., and Ostrom, E. 2008. Institutional dynamics, spatial organization and landscape change. In Political economies of landscape change: Places of integrative power, vol. 89, ed. Wescoat, J.L. and Johnston, D.M.. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J.A., Defries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R.,…Snyder, P.K. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science, 309:570–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folke, C., Jansson, A., Larsson, J., and Costanza, R. 1997. Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio, 26:167–172.Google Scholar
George, K., Ziska, L., Bunce, J., and Quebedeaux, B. 2007. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and temperature across an urban-rural transect. Atmospheric Environment, 41:7654–7665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuliano, G., and Small, K.A. 1991. Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21:163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J.G., Bai, X.M., and Briggs, J.M. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319:756–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, N.B., Grove, J.M., Pickett, S.T.A., and Redman, C.L. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience, 50:571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmond, C. 2006. Progress in measuring and observing the urban atmosphere. Theoretical Applied Climatology, 84:3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmond, C.S.B., King, T.S., Cropley, F.D., Nowak, D.J., and Souch, S. 2002. Local-scale fluxes of carbon dioxide in urban environments: Methodological challenges and results from Chicago. Environmental Pollution, 116:S243–S254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, K.R., Mendoza, D.L., Zhou, Y.Y., Fischer, M.L., Miller, C.C., Geethakumar, S., and Du Can, S.D. 2009. High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States. Environmental Science and Technology, 43:5535–5541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahs, A.K., and McDonnell, M.J. 2006. Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne's urban-rural gradient. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78:435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handy, S. 1992. Regional versus local accessibility: Variation in suburban form and the implications for nonwork travel. PhD diss., University of California at Berkeley.
Holtzclaw, J. 1994. Using residential patterns and transit to decrease auto dependence and costs. San Francisco, CA: Natural Resources Defense Council.Google Scholar
Hutyra, L.R., Yoon, B., and Alberti, M. 2011a. Terrestrial carbon stocks across a gradient of urbanization: A study of the Seattle, WA region. Global Change Biology, 17:783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutyra, L.R., Yoon, B., Hepinstall-Cymerman, J., and Alberti, M. 2011b. Land cover change in the Seattle metropolitan region: An examination of spatio-temporal patterns and carbon consequences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103:83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, C.D., Idso, S.B., Kimball, B.A., Park, H.S., Hoober, J.K., and Balling, R.C. 2000. Ultra-enhanced spring branch growth in CO2-enriched trees: Can it alter the phase of the atmosphere's seasonal CO2 cycle?Environmental and Experimental Botany, 43:91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idso, C., Idso, S., and Balling, R. 2002. An intensive two-week study of an urban CO2 dome in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Atmospheric Environment, 35:995–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imhoff, M.L., Bounoua, L., DeFries, R., Lawrence, W.T., Stutzer, D., Tucker, C.J., and Ricketts, T. 2004. The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89:434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Energy Agency. 2008. World energy outlook 2008. .
Kaye, J.P., Groffman, P.M., Grimm, N.B., Baker, L.A., and Pouyat, R.V. 2006. A distinct urban biogeochemistry?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21:192–199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaye, J.P., Majumdar, A., Gries, C., Buyantuyev, A., Grimm, N.B., Hope, D.,…Baker, L. 2008. Hierarchical Bayesian scaling of soil properties across urban, agricultural, and desert ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 18:132–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, C., Cuddigy, J., and Engel-Yan, J. 2007. The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, B., and Klopatek, J. 2002. Anthropogenic and natural CO2 emission sources in an arid urban environment. Environmental Pollution, 116(Suppl. 1):S45–S51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, M.A., Jenerette, G.D., Wu, J., and Grimm, N. 2001. The urban funnel model and spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems, 4:782–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M.J., and Hahs, A.K. 2008. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanising landscapes: Current status and future directions. Landscape Ecology, 23:1143–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M.J., and Pickett, S.T.A. 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban rural gradients – an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71:1232–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C.,…Medley, K. 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems, 1(1):21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHale, M., Baker, L., Koerner, B., Li, K., Hall, S., and Grimm, N. 2009. Impacts of urbanization on carbon cycling: A complete carbon budget of the Phoenix Metropolitan Area. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Medley, K.E., McDonnell, M.J., and Pickett, S.T.A. 1995. Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient. Professional Geographer, 47:159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasrallah, H., Balling, R., Madi, S., and Al-Ansari, L. 2003. Temporal variations in atmospheric CO2 concentrations in Kuwait City, Kuwait with comparisons to Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Environmental Pollution, 121:301–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, P., and Kenworthy, , , J.R. 1999. Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, D.J., and Crane, D.E. 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116:381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, D.J., Crane, D.E., Walton, J., Twardus, D., and Dwyer, J. 2003. Understanding and quantifying urban forest structure, functions and value. In Urban forest planning: Sustainable forests for healthy communities: Proceedings of the Fifth Canadian Urban Forest Conference, ed. Kenney, W., McKay, J., and van Wassenaer, P.. Tree Canada Foundation, Ottawa, Ontario, October 7–9, 2002.Google Scholar
NRC Committee on Methods for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2010. Verifying greenhouse gas emissions: Method to support international climate agreements. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Oke, T.R. 1982. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 108:1–24.Google Scholar
Pataki, D.E., Alig, R.J., Fung, A.S., Golubiewski, N.E., Kennedy, C.A., McPherson, E.G.,…Lankao, P.R. 2006. Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12:2092–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pataki, D.E., Carreiro, M.M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N.E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S.,…Zipperer, W.C. 2011. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: Ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pataki, D.E., Xu, T., Luo, Y.Q., and Ehleringer, J.R. 2007. Inferring biogenic and anthropogenic carbon dioxide sources across an urban to rural gradient. Oecologia, 152:307–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Boone, C.G., Groffman, P.M., Irwin, E.,…Warren, P. 2011. Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. Journal of Environmental Management, 92:331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Groffman, P.M., Band, L.E., Boone, C.G.,…Wilson, M. 2008. Beyond urban legends: An emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. BioScience, 58:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., and Costanza, R. 2001. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32:127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouyat, R., Groffman, P., Yesilonis, I., and Hernandez, L. 2002. Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 116:S107–S118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouyat, R., Yesilonis, I.D., and Nowak, D.J. 2006. Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35:1566–1575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouyat, R.V., Russell-Anelli, J., Yesilonis, I.D., and Groffman, P.M. 2003. Soil carbon in urban forest ecosystems. In The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect, ed. Kimble, J.M., Heath, L.S., Birdsey, R.A., and Lal, R.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 347–362.Google Scholar
Pushkarev, B.S., and Zupan, J.M. 1977. Public transportation and land use policy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pyle, E.H., Santoni, G.W., Nascimento, H.E.M., Hutyra, L.R., Vieira, S., Curran, D.J.,…Wofsy, S.C. 2008. Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 113:G00B08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckien, D., Ewald, M., Edenhofer, O., and Liideke, M.K.B. 2007. What parameters influence the spatial variations in CO2 emissions from road traffic in Berlin? Implications for urban planning to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Urban Studies, 44:339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A., Friedl, M.A., and Potere, D. 2009. A new map of global urban extent from MODIS data. Environmental Research Letters, 4:044003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutters, S.T., and Balling, R.C. 2006. Weekly periodicity of environmental variables in Phoenix, Arizona. Atmospheric Environment, 40:304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, S. 1992. Monocentric and polycentric density functions and their required commutes. Working Paper UCTC no. 198. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, California.
UN Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 2004. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2003 revision population database. .
UN Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 2009. World population prospects: The 2008 revision and World urbanization prospects: The 2009 revision. .
Urbanski, S., Barford, C., Wofsy, S., Kucharik, C., Pyle, E., Budney, J.,…Munger, J.W. 2007. Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 112:G02020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA FS. 2007. The forest inventory and analysis database: Database description and users guide, version 2.1. National Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P.M., Aber, J.D., Howarth, R.W., Likens, G.E., Matson, P.A., Schindler, D.W.,…Tilman, D.G. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: Sources and consequences. Ecological Applications, 7:737–750.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R.H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 42:207–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, T., Horner, M.W., and Sulik, J. 2011. A geographic approach to sectoral carbon inventory: Examining the balance between consumption-based emissions and land-use carbon sequestration in Florida. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(4):752–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×