3 - Dirac Operators and Representation Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 November 2024
Summary
This chapter is an introduction to the geometric perspective of tempered representations of connected reductive Lie groups via Dirac induction and the Connes–Kasparov isomorphism. We start with discussing Dirac operators in spin geometry. We then recall some classical Dirac operators on homogeneous spaces arising in representation theory. Next, we introduce the theory of higher index to be used as a language to formulate the Connes–Kasparov conjecture. In Section 3.4, we introduce Dirac induction, the Connes–Kasparov conjecture, and survey a couple of ways for proving it. The final section is devoted to the harmonic-analytic approach to the Connes–Kasparov isomorphism illustrated by the example of connected semisimple groups.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- K-Theory and Representation Theory , pp. 99 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Afgoustidis, A.. On the analogy between real reductive groups and Cartan motion groups: a proof of the Connes-Kasparov isomorphism. J. Funct. Anal. 277 (7) (2019), 2237–2258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afgoustidis, A.. On the analogy between real reductive groups and Cartan motion groups: contraction of irreducible tempered representations. Duke Math. J. 169 (5) (2020), 897–960.Google Scholar
Afgoustidis, A.. On the analogy between real reductive groups and Cartan motion groups: the Mackey-Higson bijection. Camb. J. Math. 9 (3) (2021), 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. F. and Bott, R., A Lefschetz fixed point formula for elliptic complexes. II. Applications. Ann. Math. 88 (2) (1968), 451–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. and Schmid, W.. A geometric construction of the discrete series for semisimple Lie groups. Invent. Math. 42 (1977), 1–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atiyah, M. F. and Segal, G. B.. The index of elliptic operators. II. Ann. Math. 87 (2) (1968), 531–545.Google Scholar
Atiyah, M. F. and Singer, I. M.. The index of elliptic operators. I. Ann. Math. 87 (2) (1968), 484–530.Google Scholar
Baum, P. and Connes, A.. Geometric K-theory for Lie groups and foliations. Enseign. Math. 46 (2) (2000), 1–2, 3–42.Google Scholar
Baum, P., Connes, A., and Higson, N.. Classifying space for proper actions and K-theory of group C∗-algebras. In: C∗-algebras: 1943–1993 A Fifty Year Celebration (ed. Doran, R., San Antonio, TX, 1993), 241–291, Contemporary Mathematics, 167, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994.Google Scholar
Baum, P. and Douglas, R. G.. K homology and index theory. In: Operator algebras and applications, Part 1 (Kingston, ON, 1980), 117–173, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, 38, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1982.Google Scholar
Baaj, S. and Julg, P.. Théorie bivariante de Kasparov et opérateurs non bornés dans les C∗-modules hilbertiens. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. I Math. 296 (21) (1983), 875–878.Google Scholar
Berline, N., Getzler, E., and Vergne, M.. Heat kernels and Dirac operators. Corrected reprint of the 1992 original. Grundlehren Text Editions. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004. x+363 pp.Google Scholar
Bott, R.. The index theorem for homogeneous differential operators. In: Differential and combinatorial topology (A symposium in honor of Marston Morse), 167–186, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,1965.Google Scholar
Brodzki, J., Niblo, G. A., Plymen, R., and Wright, N.. The local spectrum of the Dirac operator for the universal cover of SL2(R). J. Funct. Anal. 270 (3) (2016), 957–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabert, J., Echterhoff, S., and Nest, R.. The Connes-Kasparov conjecture for almost connected groups and for linear p-adic groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. No. 97 (2003), 239–278.Google Scholar
Clare, P., Crisp, T., and Higson, N.. Parabolic induction and restriction via C∗-algebras and Hilbert C∗-modules. Compos. Math. 152 (6)(2016), 1286–1318.Google Scholar
Clare, P., Higson, N., Tang, X., and Song, Y.. On the Connes-Kasparov isomorphism. I. The reduced C∗-algebra of a real reductive group and the K-theory of the tempered dual. ArXiv: 2202.02855.Google Scholar
Clare, P., Higson, N., and Song, Y.. On the Connes-Kasparov isomorphism. II. The Vogan classification of essential components in the tempered dual. ArXiv: 2202.02857.Google Scholar
Connes, A.. An analogue of the Thom isomorphism for crossed products of a C∗-algebra by an action of R. Adv. in Math. 39 (1) (1981), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A.. Noncommutative geometry. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1994. xiv+661 pp.Google Scholar
Connes, A. and Moscovici, H.. The L2-index theorem for homogeneous spaces of Lie groups. Ann. of Math. 115 (2) (1982), 291–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echterhoff, S. and Pfante, O.. Equivariant K-theory of finite dimensional real vector spaces, Münster J. Math. 2 (2009), 65–94.Google Scholar
Fell, J. M. G.. The dual spaces of C∗-algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 365–403.Google Scholar
Guo, H., Hochs, P., and Mathai, V.. Equivariant Callias index theory via coarse geometry. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 71 (6) (2021), 2387–2430.Google Scholar
Harish-Chandra. Discrete series for semisimple Lie groups. I. Construction of invariant eigendistributions. Acta Math. 113 (1965), 241–318.Google Scholar
Harish-Chandra. Discrete series for semisimple Lie groups. II. Explicit determination of the characters. Acta Math. 116 (1966), 1–111.Google Scholar
Hochs, P. and Wang, H.. A fixed point formula and Harish-Chandra's character formula. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 116 (1) (2018), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higson, N.. The Mackey analogy and K-theory. Group representations, ergodic theory, and mathematical physics: A tribute to George W. Mackey, 149–172, Contemp. Math., 2008.Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Roe, J.. Analytic K-homology. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, 2000. xviii+405 pp.Google Scholar
Higson, N. and Román, A.. The Mackey bijection for complex reductive groups and continuous fields of reduced group C∗-algebras. Represent. Theory 24 (2020), 580–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. S. and Pandzic, P.. Dirac operators in representation theory. Mathematics: Theory & Applications. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2006.Google Scholar
Kasparov, G. G.. Operator K-theory and its applications: Elliptic operators, group representations, higher signatures, C∗-extensions. Proceedings of ICM, Warsaw, 987–1000, 1984.Google Scholar
Kasparov, G. G.. Equivariant KK-theory and the Novikov conjecture. Invent. Math. 91 (1) (1988), 147–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasparov, G. G.. Elliptic and transversally elliptic index theory from the viewpoint of KK-theory. J. Noncommut. Geom. 10 (4) (2016), 1303–1378.Google Scholar
Kasparov, G. and Skandalis, G.. Groups acting properly on “bolic” spaces and the Novikov conjecture. Ann. Math. 158 (1) (2003), 165–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucerovsky, D.. A lifting theorem giving an isomorphism of KK–products in bounded and unbounded KK-theory, J. Oper. Theory 44 (2000), 255–275.Google Scholar
Lafforgue, V.. Banach KK-theory and the Baum-Connes conjecture. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. II (Beijing, 2002), 795–812, Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2002.Google Scholar
Lafforgue, V.. K-théorie bivariante pour les algébres de Banach et conjecture de Baum-Connes. Invent. Math. 149 (1) (2002), 1–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, H. B. and Michelsohn, M.-L.. Spin geometry. Princeton Mathematical Series, 38. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989. xii+427 pp.Google Scholar
Mendes, S. and Plymen, R. J.. Functoriality and K-theory for GLn (R). Münster J. Math. 10 (2017), 39–58.Google Scholar
Mesland, B. and Rennie, A.. Nonunital spectral triples and metric completeness in unbounded KK-theory, J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), 2460–2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parthasarathy, R.. Dirac operator and the discrete series. Ann. Math. 96 (2) (1972), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penington, M. G. and Plymen, R. J.. The Dirac operator and the principal series for complex semisimple Lie groups. J. Funct. Anal. 53 (3) (1983), 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, J.. Elliptic operators, topology and asymptotic methods. Second edition. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 395. Longman, Harlow, 1998. ii+209 pp.Google Scholar
Subag, E.. The algebraic Mackey-Higson bijections. J. Lie Theory 29 (2) (2019), 473–492.Google Scholar
Tan, Q., Yao, Y.-J., and Yu, S.. Mackey analogy via D-modules for SL(2, R). Internat. J. Math. 28 (7) (2017), 1750055, 20.Google Scholar
Valette, A.. Dirac induction for semisimple Lie groups having one conjugacy class of Cartan subgroups. 526–555, Lecture Notes in Math., 1132, Springer, 1985.Google Scholar
Valette, A.. Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture. From notes taken by Indira Chatterji. With an appendix by Guido Mislin. Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2002. x+104 pp.Google Scholar
A. Wassermann. Une démonstration de la conjecture de Connes-Kasparov pour les groupes de Lie linéaires connexes réductifs. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 304 (18) (1987), 559–562.Google Scholar
Wegge-Olsen, N. E.. K-theory and C∗-algebras. A friendly approach. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.Google Scholar
Willett, R. and Yu, G.. Higher index theory. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 189. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2020.Google Scholar