Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Principal events in Kropotkin's life
- Bibliographical note
- Biographical synopses
- The Conquest of Bread
- Preface
- Our riches
- Well-being for all
- Anarchist communism
- Expropriation
- Food
- Dwellings
- Clothing
- Ways and means
- The need for luxury
- Agreeable work
- Free agreement
- Objections
- The collectivist wages system
- Consumption and production
- The division of labour
- The decentralization of industry
- Agriculture
- Other writings
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
The collectivist wages system
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- Principal events in Kropotkin's life
- Bibliographical note
- Biographical synopses
- The Conquest of Bread
- Preface
- Our riches
- Well-being for all
- Anarchist communism
- Expropriation
- Food
- Dwellings
- Clothing
- Ways and means
- The need for luxury
- Agreeable work
- Free agreement
- Objections
- The collectivist wages system
- Consumption and production
- The division of labour
- The decentralization of industry
- Agriculture
- Other writings
- Index
- Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought
Summary
In their plans for the reconstruction of society the collectivists commit, in our opinion, a twofold error. While speaking of abolishing capitalist rule, they intend nevertheless to retain two institutions which are the very basis of this rule – representative government and the wages' system.
As regards so-called representative government, we have often spoken about it. It is absolutely incomprehensible to us that intelligent men – and such are not wanting in the collectivist party – can remain partisans of national or municipal parliaments after all the lessons history has given them – in France, in England, in Germany or in the United States.
While we see parliamentary rule breaking up, and from all sides criticism of this rule growing louder – not only of its results, but also of its principles – how is it that the revolutionary socialists defend a system already condemned to die?
Built up by the middle classes to hold their own against royalty, sanctioning, and, at the same time strengthening, their sway over the workers, parliamentary rule is pre-eminently a middle-class rule. The upholders of this system have never seriously maintained that a parliament or a municipal council represent a nation or a city. The most intelligent among them know that this is impossible. The middle classes have simply used the parliamentary system to raise a protecting barrier against the pretensions of royalty, without giving the people liberty.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kropotkin: 'The Conquest of Bread' and Other Writings , pp. 144 - 157Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1995