Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T18:48:34.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Redrafting Democratization Through Women's Representation and Participation in the Republic of Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

Seungsook Moon
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Sociology, Vassar College
Samuel S. Kim
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Our society is undergoing profound transformation. Politically, it is building democracy, promoting gender equality and human dignity, and civil society has been growing. … The family master system perpetuates undemocratic family, subjugating family members to the male family master.

—Bae-hee Kwak

Conventionally ignored as a dimension of the ostensibly apolitical private sphere, the power relations of reproduction fundamentally conditions who we are (and who they are), how group cultures are propagated, and how groups/nations align (identify) themselves in cooperative, competing, and complementary ways. Insofar as these reproductive processes occur within the family/household, the latter is a crucial site of politics. … On this view, transformations in the family/household have consequences for nation-states – and vice-versa [emphasis in original]. (p. 7)

V. Spike Peterson

Since the political transition from authoritarian military rule to an electoral democracy in 1987, democratization in Korea has drawn much attention from activists and scholars of the “third wave” of democratization in East Asia, Latin America, and the former Eastern Bloc. In a positive response to this global trend, Rose Lee and Cal Clark suggest that women take advantage of democratization for the empowerment that East Asian economic development fails to provide them. Although the term “democratization” is likely to evoke the hope for an open and egalitarian society, particularly for formerly marginalized social groups, the reality of political transition to procedural democracy and its aftermath seem to be far from this normative ideal.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×