Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-19T21:34:26.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2019

Federico Luzzi
Federico Luzzi
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Knowledge from Non-Knowledge
Inference, Testimony and Memory
 , pp. 189 - 196
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. E. (2002). Belief’s Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alspector-Kelly, M. (2011). ‘Why Safety Doesn’t Save Closure’, Synthese 183(2): 127–142.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. (2013). ‘Some Evidence Is False’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91(1): 165–172.Google Scholar
Audi, R. (1997). ‘The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification’, American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 405–422.Google Scholar
Audi, R. (2006). ‘Testimony, Credulity and Veracity’, in Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–49.Google Scholar
Audi, R. (2010). Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bach, K. (2008). ‘Applying Pragmatics to Epistemology’, Philosophical Issues 18: 69–88.Google Scholar
Baier, A. (1986). ‘Trust and Antitrust’, Ethics 96: 231–260.Google Scholar
Baier, A. (1992). Tanner Lectures on Human Value. Vol. 13. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Ball, B. and Blome-Tillman, M. (2014). ‘Counter-Closure and Knowledge despite Falsehood’, Philosophical Quarterly 64(257): 552–568.Google Scholar
Becker, K. (2012). ‘Methods and How to Individuate Them’, in Becker, K. and Black, T. (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81–97.Google Scholar
Becker, K. (2013). ‘Why Reliabilism Does Not Permit Easy Knowledge’, Synthese 190(17): 3751–3775.Google Scholar
Becker, K. and Black, T. (eds.) (2012). The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, A. (2007). ‘Justfied Judging’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 81–110.Google Scholar
Blaauw, M. (2005). ‘Challenging Contextualism’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 69(1): 127–146.Google Scholar
Black, T. (2002). ‘A Moorean Response to Brain-in-a-Vat Scepticism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80(2): 148–163.Google Scholar
Black, T. (2008). ‘Solving the Problem of Easy Knowledge’, Philosophical Quarterly 58: 597–619.Google Scholar
Bogardus, T. (2014). ‘Knowledge under Threat’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88(2): 289–313.Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. (1980). ‘Externalist Theories of Epistemic Justification’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5: 53–73.Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. (2011). ‘Transparent Self-Knowledge’, Supplement, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 85: 223–241.Google Scholar
Buford, C. and Cloos, C. M. (2018). ‘A Dilemma for the Knowledge despite Falsehood Strategy’, Episteme 15(2): 166–182.Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1993). ‘Content Preservation’, Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.Google Scholar
Burge, T. (1997). ‘Interlocution, Perception and Memory’, Philosophical Studies 86: 21–47.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. (2005). ‘Introspection’, Philosophical Topics 33: 79–104.Google Scholar
Byrne, A. (2011). ‘Transparency, Belief, Intention’, Supplement, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 85: 201–221.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A. and Nickel, P. J. (2014). ‘On Testimony and Transmission’, Episteme 11(2): 145–155.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (1963). ‘Knowledge and Grounds: A Comment on Mr. Gettier’s Paper’, Analysis 24(2): 46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffman, E. J. (2008). ‘Warrant without Truth?’, Synthese 162: 173–194.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2002). ‘Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 309–329.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2005). ‘Why Basic Knowledge Is Easy Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 417–430.Google Scholar
Colaco, D., Buckwalter, W., Stich, S. and Machery, E. (2014). ‘Epistemic Intuitions in Fake-Barn Thought Experiments’, Episteme 11(2): 199–212.Google Scholar
Comesaña, J. (2005). ‘Unsafe Knowledge’, Synthese 146: 395–404.Google Scholar
Cross, T. (2010). ‘Skeptical Success’, in Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–62.Google Scholar
David, M. and Warfield, T. (2008). ‘Knowledge-Closure and Skepticism’, in Smith, Q. (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137–187.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (1992). ‘Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(4): 913–929.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (1995). ‘Solving the Skeptical Problem’, Philosophical Review 104: 1–51.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (1999). ‘Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense’, in Greco, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 187–205.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (2002). ‘Assertion, Knowledge and Context’, Philosophical Review 111(2): 167–203.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (2004). ‘Single-Scoreboard Semantics’, Philosophical Studies 119(1–2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism. Vol 1: Knowledge Skepticism, and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (2010a). ‘Insensitivity Is Back, Baby!’, Philosophical Perspectives 24(1): 161–187.Google Scholar
DeRose, K. (2010b). ‘“Bamboozled by Our Own Words”: Semantic Blindness and Some Arguments against Contextualism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73(2): 316–338.Google Scholar
Douven, I. (2006). ‘Assertion, Knowledge, and Rational Credibility’, Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1969). Seeing and Knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1970). ‘Epistemic Operators’, Journal of Philosophy 67: 1007–1023.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1971). ‘Conclusive Reasons’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 49: 1–22.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1994). ‘Testimony and Memory’, in Matilal, B. and Chakrabarti, A. (eds.), Knowing from Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 251–272.Google Scholar
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. (2002). ‘Evidence, Pragmatics and Justification’, Philosophical Review 111(1): 67–94.Google Scholar
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. (2007). ‘On Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75(3): 558–589.Google Scholar
Fantl, J. and McGrath, M. (2009). Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. (2000). ‘The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge’, The Journal of Philosophy 97: 581–601.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. (2007). ‘On Telling and Trusting’, Mind 116: 875–902.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. (2011). Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feit, N. and Cullison, A. (2011). ‘When Does Falsehood Preclude Knowledge?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92(3): 283–304.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2010a). ‘Knowledge from Non-Knowledge’, slides at Copenhagen-NIP Formal Epistemology Workshop. Available at http://fitelson.org/kfnk_talk_handout.pdf.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2010b). ‘Strengthening the Case for Knowledge from Falsehood’, Analysis 70(4): 666–669.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2016). ‘Closure, Counter-Closure and Inferential Knowledge’, in Borges, R., de Almeida, C. and Klein, P. (eds.), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frances, B. (2005). Scepticism Comes Alive. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (1987). ‘The Epistemology of Testimony’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61: 57–83.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (1994). ‘Against Gullibility’, in Matilal, B. and Chakrabarti, A (eds.), Knowing from Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 125–161.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (1995). ‘Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony’, Mind 104: 393–411.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (2002). ‘Trusting Others in the Sciences: A Priori or Empirical Warrant?’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33: 373–383.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (2006a). ‘Second-Hand Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 592–618.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (2006b). ‘Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy’, in Lackey, J. and Sosa, E. (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fumerton, R. (2006). Epistemology. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. (2005). ‘The Real Guide to Fake Barns: A Catalogue of Gifts for Your Epistemic Enemies’, Philosophical Studies 124(3): 331–352.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. (1963). ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’, Analysis 23: 121–123.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. C. (2005). ‘Testimonial Knowledge through Unsafe Testimony’, Analysis 65: 302–311.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1967). ‘A Causal Theory of Knowing’, Journal of Philosophy 64(12): 357–372.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1976). ‘Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 73: 771–791.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (1986). Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (2006). ‘Can Testimony Generate Knowledge?’, Philosophica 78: 105–126.Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2004). ‘Knowledge As Credit for True Belief’, in DePaul, M. and Zagzebski, L. (eds.), Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2009). ‘Knowledge and Success from Ability’, Philosophical Studies 142(1): 17–26.Google Scholar
Greco, J. (2010). Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-Theoretic Account of Epistemic Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gundersen, L. B. (2012). ‘Knowledge, Cognitive Dispositions and Conditionals’, in Becker, K. and Black, T. (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66–80.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1973). Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkley, K. (2014). ‘Trust, Distrust and Commitment’, Noûs 48(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (1999a). ‘Actually Knowing’, Philosophical Quarterly 48(193): 453–469.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (1999b). ‘Knowing Failably’, Journal of Philosophy 96(11): 565–587.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (2010). ‘The Gettier Non-Problem’, Logos & Episteme 1(1): 85–107.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (2012). ‘The Gettier-Illusion: Gettier Partialism and Infallibilism’, Synthese 188: 217–230.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. (2008). ‘The Reasons of Trust’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 213–236.Google Scholar
Hiller, A. (2013). Knowledge Essentially Based upon False Belief’, Logos & Episteme 4(1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Hilpinen, R. (1988). ‘Knowledge and Conditionals’, Philosophical Perspectives 2: 157–182.Google Scholar
Hinchman, E. S. (2005). ‘Telling As Inviting to Trust’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(3): 562–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindriks, F. (2007). ‘The Status of the Knowledge Account of Assertion’, Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 393–406.Google Scholar
Holton, R. (1994). ‘Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 63–76.Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2007). ‘Moore’s Paradox and the Norm of Belief’, in Nuccetelli, S. and Seay, G. (eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 142–158.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1996). ‘Trust As an Affective Attitude’, Ethics 107: 4–25.Google Scholar
Kelp, C. (2009). ‘Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge – Jennifer Lackey’, Philosophical Quarterly 59: 748–750.Google Scholar
Klein, P. (1971). ‘A Proposed Definition of Propositional Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 68: 471–482.Google Scholar
Klein, P. (1976). ‘Knowledge, Causality, and Defeasibility’, The Journal of Philosophy 73: 792–812.Google Scholar
Klein, P. (1979). ‘Misleading “Misleading Defeaters”’, The Journal of Philosophy 76: 382–386.Google Scholar
Klein, P. (1980). ‘Misleading Evidence and the Restoration of Justification’, Philosophical Studies 37: 81–89.Google Scholar
Klein, P. (2008). ‘Useful False Beliefs’, in Smith, Q. (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 25–62.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (1999). ‘Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission’, Philosophical Quarterly 49: 471–490.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2005) ‘Memory as a Generative Epistemic Source’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(3): 636–658.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2007a). ‘Norms of Assertion’, Noûs 41: 594–626.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2007b). ‘Why Memory Really Is a Generative Epistemic Source: A Reply to Señor’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74(1): 209–219.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. (1965). ‘Knowledge, Truth and Evidence’, Analysis 25(5): 168–175.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. (1974). Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrer, K. and Paxson, T. (1969). ‘Knowledge: Undefeated Justified True Belief’, Journal of Philosophy 66: 225–237.Google Scholar
Luper-Foy, S. (1987). ‘The Possibility of Skepticisim’, in Luper-Foy, S. (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 219–241.Google Scholar
Luzzi, F. (2010). ‘Counter-Closure’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88(4): 673–683.Google Scholar
Luzzi, F. (2012a). ‘Contextualism and Counter-Closure’, dialectica 66(1):187–199.Google Scholar
Luzzi, F. (2012b). ‘Interest-Relative Invariantism and Knowledge from Ignorance’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93(1): 31–42.Google Scholar
Luzzi, F. (2014). ‘What Does Knowledge-Yielding Deduction Require of Its Premises?’, Episteme 11(3): 261–275.Google Scholar
Luzzi, F. (2015). ‘Is Testimonial Knowledge Second-Hand Knowledge?’, Erkenntnis 81(4): 899–918.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A. (2006). ‘Is There A Priori Knowledge by Testimony?’, Philosophical Review 115(2): 199–241.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A. (2014). ‘A Priori Testimony Revisited’, in Casullo, A. and Thurow, J. (eds.), The A Priori in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 159–179.Google Scholar
Markie, P. (2005). ‘Easy Knowledge’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(2): 406–416.Google Scholar
McGeer, V. (2008). ‘Trust, Hope and Empowerment’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, A. (2013). ‘Believing Things Unknown’, Noûs 47(2): 385–407.Google Scholar
Michaelian, K. (2011). ‘Generative Memory’, Philosophical Psychology 24(3): 323–342.Google Scholar
Montminy, M. (2015). ‘Knowledge despite Falsehood’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44(3–4): 463–475.Google Scholar
Morton, A. and Karjalainen, A. (2003). ‘Contrastive Knowledge’, Philosophical Explanations 6(2): 74–89.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. (2005). ‘Closure Failures for Safety’, Philosophia 33: 331–334.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. (2013). ‘Another Blow to Knowledge from Knowledge’, Logos & Episteme 4: 311–317.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. (2017). ‘Justified Belief from Unjustified Belief’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98: 602–617.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. and Black, T. (2012). ‘Sensitivity Meets Explanation: An Improved Counterfactual Condition on Knowledge’, in Becker, K. and Black, T. (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–42.Google Scholar
Neta, R. and Rohrbaugh, G., (2004). ‘Luminosity and the Safety of Knowledge’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4): 396–406.Google Scholar
Nichols, S., Stich, S. and Weinberg, J. (2002). ‘Meta-Skepticism: Meditations in Ethno-Epistemology’, in Luper, S., The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 227–248.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olivier, K. (manuscript) ‘Virtue Perspectivism and Knowledge from Non-knowledge’.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. (2013). ‘Testimony, Testimonial Belief, and Safety’, Philosophical Studies 164(1): 205–217.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. (1986) Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2007). ‘Anti-Luck Epistemology’, Synthese 158: 277–297.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2000). ‘The Skeptic and the Dogmatist’, Noûs 34(4): 517–549.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2004). ‘What’s Wrong with Moore’s Argument?’, Philosophical Issues 14: 349–378.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. (2012). ‘When Warrant Transmits’, in Coliva, A. (ed.), Mind, Meaning and Knowledge: Themes from the Philosophy of Crispin Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–303.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, M. (2015). ‘Knowing By Way of Tracking and Epistemic Closure’, Analysis 75(2): 217–223.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1975). ‘Testimonial Evidence’, in Lehrer, K. (ed.), Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm. Dordrecht: Reidel, 35–55.Google Scholar
Roush, S. (2005). Tracking Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roush, S. (2012). ‘Sensitivity and Closure’, in Becker, K. and Black, T. (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 242–268.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1948). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Its Limits. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, M. (1997). ‘Easy Possibilities’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57(4): 907–919.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. T. and Champawat, N. (1964), ‘Mr Clark’s Definition of “Knowledge”’, Analysis 25(1): 8–9.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2004). ‘From Contextualism to Contrastivism’, Philosophical Studies 119: 233–255.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2007a). ‘Closure, Contrast and Answer’, Philosophical Studies 133: 233–255.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2007b). ‘What Shifts? Thresholds, Standards or Alternatives?’, in Preyer, G. and Peters, G. (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–130.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2008a). ‘The Contrast-Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions’, Social Epistemology 22(3): 235–245.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. (2008b). ‘Knowledge in the Image of Assertion’, Philosophical Issues 18(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Schnee, I. (2015). ‘There Is No Knowledge from Falsehood’, Episteme 12(1): 53–74.Google Scholar
Señor, T. (2007). ‘Preserving Preservationism: A Reply to Lackey’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74(1): 199–208.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. (1991). ‘“P, therefore, P” without Circularity’, Journal of Philosophy 88(5): 245–266.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (1974). ‘How Do You Know?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 11: 113–122.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (1979). ‘Epistemic Presupposition’, in Pappas, George S. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology (Dordrecht: Reidel), 79–92.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (1999). ‘How to Defeat Opposition to Moore’, Philosophical Perspectives 13: 141–153.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (2007). ‘Replies to Gilbert Harman, Ram Neta, and Stephen Schiffer’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75(1): 196–210.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2007). Without Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1981). Reasons and Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turri, J. (2016). ‘Knowledge and Assertion in Gettier Cases’, Philosophical Psychology 29(5): 759–775.Google Scholar
Unger, P. (1968). ‘An Analysis of Factual Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 65: 157–170.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. (1987). ‘Tracking, Closure and Inductive Knowledge’, in Luper-Foy, S. (ed.) The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield), 197–215.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. (2000). ‘Reliabilism Levelled’, Journal of Philosophy 97(11): 602–623.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. (2007). ‘Subjunctivitis’, Philosophical Studies 134(1): 73–88.Google Scholar
Warfield, T. (2004). ‘When Epistemic Closure Does and Does Not Fail: A Lesson from the History of Epistemology’, Analysis 64(1): 35–41.Google Scholar
Warfield, T. (2005). ‘Knowledge from Falsehood’, Philosophical Perspectives 19: 405–416.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. (2004). ‘Luminous Margins’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82: 373–383.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. (2005). ‘Can We Do without Pragmatic Encroachment?’, Philosophical Perspectives 19(1): 417–443.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. (2011). ‘Defending Interest-Relative Invariantism’, Logos & Episteme 2: 591–609.Google Scholar
Weatherson, B. (2012). ‘Knowledge, Bets and Interests’, in Brown, J. and Gerken, M. (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 75–103.Google Scholar
Welbourne, M. (1994). ‘Testimony, Knowledge and Belief’, in Matilal, B. and Chakrabarti, A. (eds.), Knowing from Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 297–313.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. and Sinhababu, N. (2015). ‘The Backward Clock, Truth-Tracking and Safety’, Journal of Philosophy 112(1): 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (in press). ‘Justification, Excuses and Sceptical Scenarios’, in Dutant, J. and Dorsch, F. (eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (1985). ‘Facts and Certainty’, Proceedings of the British Academy 71: 429–472.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2000). ‘Cogency and Question-Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey’s Paradox and Putnam’s Proof’, Philosophical Issues 10: 140–163.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2002). ‘(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 331–349.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2003). ‘Some Reflections on the Acquisition of Warrant by Inference’, in Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism, Scepticism and Self-Knowledge. Boston: MIT Press, 57–78.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004a). ‘Intuition, Entitlement and the Epistemology of Logical Laws’, dialectica 58: 155–175.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2004b). ‘Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?’, Supplement, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78(1): 167–212.Google Scholar
Wright, C. (2014). ‘On Epistemic Entitlement (II): Welfare State Epistemology’, in Dodd, D. and Zardini, E. (eds.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 213–247.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (2016). ‘The Transmission of Knowledge and Justification’, Synthese 193(1): 293–311.Google Scholar
Yan, M. (2013). ‘When Does Epistemic Closure Fail?’, Analysis 73(2): 260–264.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, J. (2005). ‘Externalism, Skepticism and the Problem of Easy Knowledge’, Philosophical Review 114(1): 33–61.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×