Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Theory of Power Sharing and Attributions under Authoritarian Rule
- 3 Cross-National Evidence on Power Sharing and Attributions in Autocracies
- 4 The Jordanian Monarchy’s Strategic Blame Games
- 5 How Jordanians Attribute Responsibility
- 6 Power Sharing and Attributions across Jordan’s Modern History
- 7 How Jordan’s Blame Games Influence Governance
- 8 The Royal Advantage in Power Sharing and Blame Shifting
- 9 Power Sharing, Blame, and the Collapse of Royal Regimes
- 10 Conclusion
- References
- Index
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 A Theory of Power Sharing and Attributions under Authoritarian Rule
- 3 Cross-National Evidence on Power Sharing and Attributions in Autocracies
- 4 The Jordanian Monarchy’s Strategic Blame Games
- 5 How Jordanians Attribute Responsibility
- 6 Power Sharing and Attributions across Jordan’s Modern History
- 7 How Jordan’s Blame Games Influence Governance
- 8 The Royal Advantage in Power Sharing and Blame Shifting
- 9 Power Sharing, Blame, and the Collapse of Royal Regimes
- 10 Conclusion
- References
- Index
Summary
Chapter 1 builds from the example of the Arab Spring uprisings to illustrate the importance of blame for authoritarian politics and its relevance to the stability of ruling monarchies. The chapter summarizes the book’s argument about how power sharing affects attributions under autocracy and how autocrats strategically try to limit their exposure to blame by delegating decision-making powers to other political elites. It then describes why autocratic monarchs are better positioned than other autocrats to avoid blame by sharing power. The chapter also discusses the book’s contributions to scholarship on authoritarianism, including how popular politics affect regime stability, when autocrats are more or less likely to share power, why autocratic monarchies have been so stable, and how power sharing and popular politics interact in authoritarian settings. The chapter ends with an outline of the remainder of the book.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The King Can Do No WrongBlame Games and Power Sharing in Authoritarian Regimes, pp. 1 - 38Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024