Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T20:24:41.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Landscape ecology: the state-of-the-science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

By
Jianguo Wu  and
Richard Hobbs
Edited by
Jianguo Wu  and
Richard J. Hobbs
Jianguo Wu
Affiliation:
Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
Richard Hobbs
Affiliation:
Professor, Murdoch University, Western Australia
Jianguo Wu
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Richard J. Hobbs
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Good science starts with precise definitions because clearly defined terminology is a prerequisite for any fruitful scientific discourse. For rapidly developing interdisciplinary sciences like landscape ecology, unambiguous definitions are particularly important. Contemporary landscape ecology is characterized by a flux of ideas and perspectives that cut across a number of disciplines in both natural and social sciences, as evidenced in the previous chapters of this volume. On the one hand, after having experienced an unprecedented rapid development in theory and practice in the past two decades, landscape ecology has become a globally recognized scientific enterprise. On the other hand, more than 65 years after the term “landscape ecology” was first introduced, landscape ecologists are still debating on what constitutes a landscape and what landscape ecology really is (e.g., Wiens 1992, Hobbs 1997, Wiens and Moss 1999, Wu and Hobbs 2002).

Two major schools of thought in landscape ecology have widely been recognized: the European approach that is more humanistic and holistic and the North American approach that is more biophysical and analytical. To increase the synergies between the two approaches, not only do we need to appreciate the values of both approaches, but also to develop an appropriate framework in which different perspectives and methods are properly related. Toward this end, in this chapter we shall compare and contrast the European and North American approaches through several exemplary definitions (see Table 15.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Key Topics in Landscape Ecology , pp. 271 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahern, J. 1999. Integration of landscape ecology and landscape design: an evolutionary process. Pages 119–23 in Wiens, J. A. and Moss, M. R. (eds.). Issues in Landscape Ecology. Snowmass Village: International Association for Landscape Ecology.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. H. and Hoekstra, T. W.. 1992. Toward a Unified Ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bastian, O. 2001. Landscape ecology: towards a unified discipline?Landscape Ecology 16, 757–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastian, O. and Steinhardt, U. (eds.). 2002. Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burel, F. and Baudry, J.. 2003. Landscape Ecology: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Clark, W. C. and Dickson, N. M.. 2003. Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 100, 8059–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farina, A. 1998. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. 1981. Interaction among landscape elements: a core of landscape ecology. Pages 35–48 in Tjallingii, S. P. and Veer, A. A. (eds.). Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: Contributions to Research, Planning and Management of Our Environment. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. 1990. The beginnings of landscape ecology in America. Pages 35–41 in Zonneveld, I. S. and Forman, R. T. T. (eds.). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M.. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31, 733–40.Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M.. 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 37, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., et al. 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292, 6–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, S. A. and Paine, R. T.. 1974. Disturbance, patch formation and community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 71, 2744–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O.. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Moss, M. R. 1999. Fostering academic and institutional activities in landscape ecology. Pages 138–44 in Wiens, J. A. and Moss, M. R. (eds.). Issues in Landscape Ecology. Snowmass Village: International Association for Landscape Ecology.Google Scholar
Nassauer, J. I. 1997. Culture and landscape ecology: insights for action. Pages 1–11 in Nassauer, J. I. (ed.). Placing Nature: Culture and Landscape Ecology. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Naveh, Z. 1991. Some remarks on recent developments in landscape ecology as a transdisciplinary ecological and geographical science. Landscape Ecology 5, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveh, Z. 2000. What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning 50, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A. S.. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A. S.. 1994. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L.. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269, 3–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickett, S. T. A. and White, P. S.. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Poole, G. C. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology 47, 641–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, P. G., Karr, J. R., and Forman, R. T. T.. 1984. Landscape Ecology: Directions and Approaches. Special Publication 2. Champaign: Illinois Natural History Survey.Google Scholar
Schreiber, K.-F. 1990. The history of landscape ecology in Europe. Pages 21–33 in Zonneveld, I. S. and Forman, R. T. T. (eds.). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. H. 1989. The ocean “landscape”. Landscape Ecology 3, 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, A. G. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16, 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tress, G., Tress, B., and Fry, G.. 2005. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 20, 479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troll, C. 1939. Luftbildplan and okologische bodenforschung. Zeitschraft der Gesellschaft fur Erdkunde Zu Berlin, 241–98.
Troll, C. 1968. Landschaftsokologie. Pages 1–21 in Pflanzensoziologie und Landschaftsokologie – Symposium Stolzenau. Junk: The Hague.Google Scholar
Troll, C. 1971. Landscape ecology (geoecology) and biogeocenology – a terminological study. Geoforum 8, 43–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20, 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. 2005. Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future. Ecology 86, 1967–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G., Gardner, R. H., and O'Neill, R. V.. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 1992. What is landscape ecology, really?Landscape Ecology 7, 149–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 1999. Toward a unified landscape ecology. Pages 148–51 in Wiens, J. A. and Moss, M. R. (eds.). Issues in Landscape Ecology. Snowmass Village: International Association for Landscape Ecology.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47, 501–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. and Milne, B. T.. 1989. Scaling of “landscape” in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecology 3, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A. and Moss, M. R. (eds.). 1999. Issues in Landscape Ecology. Snowmass Village: International Association for Landscape Ecology.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Hobbs, R.. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17, 355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. and Levin, S. A.. 1994. A spatial patch dynamic modeling approach to pattern and process in an annual grassland. Ecological Monographs 64(4), 447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. and Loucks, O. L.. 1995. From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70, 439–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. and J. L. Vankat. 1995. Island biogeography: theory and applications. Pages 371–9 in Nierenberg, W. A. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Environmental Biology. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, I. S. 1972. Land Evaluation and Land(scape) Science. Enschede, The Netherlands: International Institute for Aerial Survey and Earth Sciences.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×