Adams, Robert Merrihew, Finite and Infinite Goods (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E., ‘Morality and Freedom: Kant's Reciprocity Thesis’, The Philosophical Review 95 (1986), 393–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E., Kant's Theory of Freedom (Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E., ‘On a Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Categorical Imperative’, Philosophical Topics 19 (1991), 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Almeida, Guido Antonio, ‘Critique, Deduction, and Fact of Reason’, in Brazilian Work on Kant, Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar (eds.), (Rochester University Press, in preparation)

Ameriks, Karl, ‘Kant's Deduction of Freedom and Morality’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (1981), 53–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, Kant's Theory of Mind: an Analysis of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl, ‘Kant's Groundwork III Argument Reconsidered’ in his Interpreting Kant's Critiques (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003), pp. 226–48. Previously published as ‘Zu Argumentation am Anfang des Dritten Abschnitts der Grundlegung’ in Baumgarten, Hans-Ulrich and Held, Carsten (eds.), Systematische Ethik mit Kant (Freiburg: Alber, 2001), pp. 24–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics (Irwin, T. (ed. and trans.), Indianapolis/ Cambridge: Hackett, 1999)Google Scholar

Aune, Bruce, Kant's Theory of Morals (Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Baron, Marcia, Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology (Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Baron, Marcia, ‘Acting from Duty’ in Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Wood, Allen (trans.), Yale University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason (University of Chicago Press, 1960)Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White, Early German Philosophy: Kant and his Predecessors (Harvard University Press, 1969)Google Scholar

Beck, Lewis White (ed.), Hoke Robinson Selected Essays on Kant, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy 6 (University of Rochester Press, 2002)

Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad (eds.), Materialen zu Kants ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft’ (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975)

Bojanowski, Jochen, Kants Theorie der Freiheit: Rekonstruktion und Rehabilitierung (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, David O., Perfectionism and the Common Good: Themes in the Philosophy of T. H. Green (Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Joseph, Sermons (Bernard, J. H. (ed.), London, 1900)Google Scholar

Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRef

Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De Officiis (Miller, Walter (trans.), Harvard University Press, 1947)Google Scholar

Dancy, Jonathan, Moral Reasons (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1993)Google Scholar

Dancy, Jonathan, Ethics Without Principles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, Richard, ‘Cummiskey's Kantian Consequentialism’, Utilitas 12 (2000), 25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, Richard, The Value of Humanity in Kant's Moral Theory (Clarendon Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Düsing, Klaus, ‘Das Problem des höchsten Gutes in Kants praktischer Philosophie’, Kant-Studien 62 (1971), 5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbinghaus, Julius, ‘Die Formeln des Kategorischen Imperativs und die Ableitung inhaltlich bestimmter Pflichten’ in his Gesammelte Schriften (Bouvier, 1988), vol. II, pp. 209–29Google Scholar

Esteves, Julio, ‘The Non-Circular Deduction of the Categorical Imperative in Groundwork III’ in Rauscher, Frederick and Perez, Daniel Omar (eds.), Brazilian Work on Kant (Rochester University Press, in preparation)

Flikschuh, Katrin, ‘Kant's Indemonstrable Postulate of Right: a Response to Paul Guyer’, Kantian Review 12 (2007), 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flikschuh, K., ‘Nature, Duty, Right: Kant's Answer to Mendelssohn in “Theory and Practice III”’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2007), 223–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garve, Christian, ‘Review of Critik der reinen Vernunft, by Immanuel Kant’, Zugabe zu den Göttingischen Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen 1 (1782), 40–8Google Scholar

Garve, Christian, Über die Verbindung der Moral mit der Politik (Korn, 1788)Google Scholar

Garve, Christian, Über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Moral, Literatur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben (Korn, 1792)Google Scholar

Garve, Christian, Über Gesellschaft und Einsamkeit (Korn, 1797–1800)Google Scholar

Garve, Christian, Übersicht der vornehmsten Principien der Sittenlehre, von dem Zeitalter des Aristoteles an bis auf unsre Zeiten (Korn, 1798)Google Scholar

Garve, Christian, Einige Betrachtungen über die allgemeinen Grundsätze der Sittenlehre (Korn, 1798)Google Scholar

Gellert, Christian Fürchfegott, Sämmtliche Schriften. Neue verbesserte Auflage (Leipzig: M. G. Weidmanns Erben und Reich und Caspar Fritsch, 1775)Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond, ‘Morality and Identity’ in Korsgaard, C. M., The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 189–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, Allan, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings (Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Gibbard, Allan, ‘Morality as Consistency in Living: Korsgaard's Kantian Lectures’, Ethics 110 (1999), 140–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grenberg, Jeanine, Kant and the Ethics of Humility: a Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul, Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness (Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guyer, Paul, Kant (Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul, ‘The Crooked Timber of Humankind’ in Rorty, Amelie and Schmidt, James (eds.), Philosophy as History: Essays on Kant's Idea for a Universal History (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Hamann, Johann Georg, Briefwechsel (Henkel, Arthur (ed.), Frankfurt: Insel, 1965)Google Scholar

Hare, R. M., Freedom and Reason (Oxford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar

Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, ‘Hutcheson und Kant’, Kant-Studien 49 (1957/8)Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, ‘Über Kants früheste Ethik’, Kant-Studien 54 (1963) 404–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, ‘Der Begriff der sittlichen Einsicht und Kants Lehre vom Faktum der Vernunft’ in Prauss, Gerold (ed.), Kant: Zur Deutung seiner Theorie von Erkennen u. Handeln, Neue Wissenschaftenliche Bibliothek, 63: Philosophie (Kiepenheuer und Witsch, 1973), pp. 223–54. Translated as ‘The Concept of Moral Insight and Kant's Doctrine of the Fact of Reason’ in Velkley, Richard (ed.), The Unity of Reason: Essays on Kant's Philosophy (Harvard University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter, ‘Die Deduktion des Sittengesetzes: Über die Gründe der Dunkelheit des letzten Abschnittes von Kants “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik Der Sitten”’ in Schwan, Alexander (ed.), Denken im Schatten des Nihilismus (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975), pp. 55–112. Translated as ‘The Deduction of the Moral Law: the Reasons for the Obscurity of the Final Section of Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’ in Paul Guyer (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield, 1998)Google Scholar

Henson, Richard, ‘What Kant Might Have Said: Moral Worth and the Overdetermination of Dutiful Action’, Philosophical Review 88 (1979), 39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, Barbara, ‘On the Value of Acting from the Motive of Duty’ in The Practice of Moral Judgment (Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Herman, Barbara, The Practice of Moral Judgment (Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Herman, Barbara, ‘Making Room for Character’ in Stephen Engstrom, and Jennifer Whiting, (eds.), Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 36–62Google Scholar

Herman, Barbara, ‘A Cosmopolitan Kingdom of Ends’ in Herman, Barbara, Korsgaard, Christine and Reath, Andrews (eds.), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays in Honour of John Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 187–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., ‘Kant's Argument for the Rationality of Moral Conduct’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66 (1985), 3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., Autonomy and Self-Respect (Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Hill, Thomas E., ‘Treating Criminals as Ends in Themselves’, Annual Review of Law and Ethics 11 (2003), 17–36Google Scholar

Hills, A. E., ‘Kant on Happiness and Reason’, History of Philosophy Quarterly (2006), 234–62Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, ‘Universalistische Ethik und Urteilskraft: ein aristotelischer Blick auf Kant’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung (1990), 537–63Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried, ‘Aristoteles’ universalistische Tugendethik' in Rippe, Klaus Peter and Schaber, Peter (eds.), Tugendethik (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1998), pp. 42–68Google Scholar

Hooker, Brad and Little, Margaret Olivia (eds.), Moral Particularism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)

Hurka, Thomas, Perfectionism (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Johnson, R., ‘Happiness as a Natural End’ in Timmons, M. (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Kaulbach, Friedrich, Immanuel Kants ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysic der Sitten’ (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988)Google Scholar

Kerstein, Samuel, Kant's Search for the Supreme Principle of Morality (Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerstein, Samuel, ‘Deriving the Formula of Humanity’ in Horn, C. and Schönecker, D. (eds.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: New Interpretations (de Gruyter, 2006), pp. 200–21Google Scholar

Kors, Alan Charles (ed.), Encyclopedia of Enlightenment (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)

Korsgaard, Christine M., ‘Morality as Freedom’ in Yovel, Yirmiahu (ed.), Kant's Practical Philosophy Reconsidered (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989), pp. 23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., ‘Kant's Formula of Humanity’ in her Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 106–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., ‘The Normativity of Instrumental Reason’ in Cullity, Garrett and Gaut, Berys (eds.), Ethics and Practical Reason (Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 215–54Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., ‘Reply to Ginsborg, Schneewind and Guyer’, Ethics 109 (1998), 49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine M., The Myth of Egoism, The Lindley Lectures (University of Kansas, 1999)Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, ‘The Moral Dimension of Kant's Inaugural Dissertation: a New Perspective on the “Great Light of 1769?”’ in Proceedings of the 8th International Kant Congress in Memphis (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995), vol. 1.2, pp. 373–92Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, Kant: a Biography (Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, ‘Kant and Cicero’ in Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter and Schumacher, Ralph (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Kant Congress in Berlin, April 2000 (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2001), pp. 270–8Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, ‘Einleitung’ in Stark, Werner (ed.), Immanuel Kant, Vorlesungen zur Moralphilosophie (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004), pp. vii–xxxvCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred, ‘Introduction’ in Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (Louden, Robert (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. vii–xxxiiiGoogle Scholar

Löhrer, Guido, Menschliche Würde (Alber, 1995)Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B., ‘Go-Carts of Judgment: Exemplars in Kantian Moral Education, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 74 (1992), 303–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louden, Robert B., Morality and Moral Theory: a Reappraisal and Reaffirmation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louden, Robert B., ‘Examples in Ethics’ in Craig, Edward (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 1998), vol. III, pp. 487–90Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B., Kant's Impure Ethics: From Rational Beings to Human Beings (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B., ‘The Second Part of Morals’ in Jacobs, Brian and Kain, Patrick (eds.), Essays on Kant's Anthropology (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 60–84Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B., The World We Want: How and Why the Ideals of the Enlightenment Still Elude Us (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Louden, Robert B., ‘Kantian Moral Humility: Between Aristotle and Paul’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007), 632–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ludwig, Bernd, ‘Whence Public Right? The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Kant's Doctrine of Right’ in Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 159–85Google Scholar

McDowell, John, ‘Virtue and Reason’, The Monist 62 (1979), 331–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meerbote, Ralf, ‘Kant on the Nondeterminate Character of Human Actions’ in Harper, William L. and Meerbote, Ralf (eds.), Kant on Causality, Freedom, and Objectivity (University of Minnesota Press, 1984), pp. 138–63Google Scholar

Melnick, Arthur, ‘Kant's Formulations of the Categorical Imperative’, Kant-Studien 93 (2002), 291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mieth, Corinna and Rosenthal, Jacob, ‘“Freedom Must be Presupposed as a Property of All Rational Beings”’ in Christoph, Horn and Schönecker, Dieter (eds.), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (de Gruyter, 2006)Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism (Hackett, 1979). Originally published in Fraser's Magazine (1861)Google Scholar

Mill, J. S., Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy (Longman, 1866)Google Scholar

Morgan, Seiriol, ‘The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity's Radical Evil in Kant's Religion’, Philosophical Review 114 (2005), 63–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, The Possibility of Altruism (Princeton University Press, 1978)Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha, ‘Non-Relative Virtues: an Aristotelian Approach’ in Nussbaum, Martha C. and Sen, Amartya (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 242–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, Acting on Principle (Columbia University Press, 1975)Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, ‘Universal Law and Ends-in-Themselves’ in her Constructions of Reason (Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 126–44Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, ‘Consistency in Action’ in Guyer, Paul (ed.), Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays (Rowman & Littlefield, 1998), pp. 103–31Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, ‘Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature II’, Aristotelian Society Supplement 72 (1998), 211–28Google Scholar

Paton, H. J., The Categorical Imperative: a Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy (London: Hutchinson's University Library, 1947)Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert, ‘Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1987), 449–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, ‘The Categorical Imperative’ in Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar (1989), pp. 172–93

Pöschl, Viktor, ‘Der Begriff der Würde im antiken Rom und später’ in Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse (Carl Winter, 1969), vol. III, pp. 7–67Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerald, Kant über Freiheit als Autonomie (Klostermann, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pufendorf, Samuel, The Whole Duty of Man (Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David (eds.), Liberty Fund, 2003)Google Scholar

Quarfood, Marcel, ‘The Circle and the Two Standpoints’ in Horn, Christoph and Schönecker, Dieter (eds.), Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2006), pp. 285–300Google Scholar

Quinn, Philip L. and Miller, Christian B. (eds.), Essays in the Philosophy of Religion (Oxford University Press, 2006)

Rauscher, Frederick, ‘Razão prática pura como uma faculdade natural’ [‘Pure Practical Reason as a Natural Faculty’], Tonetto, Milene Consenso (trans.), in Ethic@ 5 (2006), 173–92 at www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@Google Scholar

Rauscher, Frederick, ‘Reason as a Natural Cause’ in Klemme, Heiner, Kuehn, Manfred and Schönecker, Dieter (eds.), Moralische Motivation: Kant und die Alternativen (Hamburg: Meiner, 2006)Google Scholar

Rawls, John, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy (Herman, Barbara (ed.), Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Reath, Andrews, ‘Legislating for a Realm of Ends: the Social Dimension of Autonomy’ in his Agency and Autonomy (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 173–96Google Scholar

Reich, Klaus, ‘Kant and Greek Ethics II’, Mind 48 (1939), 446–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricken, Friedo, ‘Homo noumenon und homo phaenomenon’ in Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar (Klostermann, 1989), pp. 234–52Google Scholar

Ross, David, Kant's Ethical Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Émile (Foxley, Barbara (trans.), London: Dent, 1911)Google Scholar

Sassen, Birgitte (ed.), Kant's Early Critics: the Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B., ‘Hume and the Religious Significance of Moral Rationalism’, Hume Studies 26 (2000), 211–23Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter, Kant: Grundlegung III: Die Deduktion des kategorischen Imperativs (Freiburg: Alber, 1999)Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter, ‘How is a Categorical Imperative Possible? Kant's Deduction of the Categorical Imperative’ in Horn, C. and Schönecker, D., Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (de Gruyter, 2006), pp. 301–24Google Scholar

Schönecker, Dieter and Wood, Allen W., Kants ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten’: Ein einführender Kommentar (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2002)Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, ‘Kants Begriff der Menschenwürde’ in Bormann, Franz-Josef and Schröer, Christian (eds.), Abwägende Vernunft (de Gruyter, 2004), pp. 220–36Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, ‘Kant's Treatment of Human Dignity in the Groundwork’ in Rohden, Valerio, Terra, Ricardo R. and Almeida, Guido A. (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Akten des X. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses (de Gruyter, 2008), vol. III, pp. 391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sensen, Oliver, ‘Kant's Conception of Human Dignity’, in Kant-Studien (forthcoming)

Sherman, Nancy, Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue (Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry, The Methods of Ethics (London: Macmillan, 1907)Google Scholar

Siep, Ludwig, ‘Wozu eine Metaphysik der Sitten?’ in Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar (Klostermann, 1989)Google Scholar

Skorupski, John, ‘Internal Reasons and the Scope of Blame’ in Thomas, Alan (ed.), Bernard Williams (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 73–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sobel, David, ‘Do the Desires of Rational Agents Converge?’, Analysis 59 (1999), 137–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stocker, Michael, ‘The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories’, Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976), 453–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stratton-Lake, Philip, Kant, Duty and Moral Worth (Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar

Stratton-Lake, Philip, Ethical Intuitionism: Re-evaluations (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Sullivan, Roger J., Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sullivan, Roger J., Introduction to Kant's Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sussman, David, ‘Perversity of the Heart’, Philosophical Review 114 (2005), 153–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, James Stacy (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRef

Timmermann, Jens, Sittengesetz und Freiheit: Untersuchungen zu Immanuel Kants Theorie des Freien Willens, Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie, Bd. 60 (Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmermann, Jens, ‘Sollen und Können: “Du kannst, denn du sollst” und “Sollen impliziert Können” im Vergleich’, Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse (Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy) 6 (2003), 113–22 ‘Value Without Regress: Kant's “Formula of Humanity” Revisited’, European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2006), 69–83Google Scholar

Timmermann, Jens, Kant's ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’: a Commentary (Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Timmermann, Jens (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, (Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 2004)

Schönborn, Alexander, ‘Kant and the Absolute’, Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1976), 145–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Nicholas, Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics (Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilde, Oscar, The Portable Oscar Wilde (Arlington, Richard (ed.), New York: Viking, 1965)Google Scholar

Willaschek, Marcus, Praktische Vernunft: Handlungstheorie und Moralbegründung bei Kant (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar

Wolff, Robert Paul, The Autonomy of Reason (New York: Harper and Row, 1973)Google Scholar

Wood, Allen, ‘Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature I’, Aristotelian Society Supplement 72 (1998), 189–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Allen, Kant's Ethical Thought (Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Allen, ‘The Moral Law as a System of Formulas’ in Fulda, Hans Friedrich and Stolzenberg, Jürgen (eds.), Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants (Hamburg: Meiner, 2001), pp. 287–306Google Scholar

Wood, Allen, ‘The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy’ in Timmons, Mark (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 1–22Google Scholar

Wood, Allen, ‘The Supreme Principle of Morality’ in Guyer, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 342–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar