Book contents
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2025
Book contents
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- General Note on Citations and Translations
- General Introduction
- Part I Pre-Kantian Moral Philosophy
- Part II Between the Critiques
- Part III The Reception of the Critique of Practical Reason
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kant's Critique of Practical ReasonBackground Source Materials, pp. 281 - 292Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Adelung, Johann Christoph. (1811) Grammatisch-kritisches Wörterbuch der hochdeutschen Mundart. 4 vols. Vienna.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael. (2015) ‘Wizenmann, Thomas,’ in Kant-Lexikon. Edited by Willaschek, M., Stozlenberg, J., Mohr, G., and Bacin, S.. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 2677–78.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Michael. (2018) ‘Wolff an den deutschsprachigen Universitäten,’ in Handbuch Christian Wolff. Edited by Theis, Robert and Aichele, Alexander. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 427–66.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1990) Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2006) ‘Kant on Freedom of the Will,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2011) Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. (1776) ‘Kurzgefasste Lebensgeschichte Herrn Christian August Crusius,’ in Acta historico-ecclesiastica. Vol. XVII. Weimar, pp. 970–93.Google Scholar
Anonymous. (1799) ‘Todesfall,’ in Intelligenzblatt der Neuen allgemeinen deutschen Bibliothek. No. 31. Appendix to Vol. 45, pp. 249–53.Google Scholar
Baum, Manfred. (2020) ‘Kant und Ciceros De officiis,’ in Kleine Schriften II. Arbeiten zur praktischen Philosophie Kants. Edited by Hüning, Dieter. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander. (2013) Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander. (2020) Elements of First Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. (1949) ‘Introduction,’ in Critique of Practical Reason and Other Writings in Moral Philosophy by Immanuel Kant. Edited and translated with an Introduction by Beck, Lewis White. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. (1960) A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1987) The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (2020) ‘August Wilhelm Rehberg.’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition). Edited by Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/august-rehberg/Google Scholar
Biller, Gerhard. (2018) ‘Biographie und Bibliographie,’ in Handbuch Christian Wolff. Edited by Theis, Robert and Aichele, Alexander. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birken-Bertsch, Hanno. (2015) ‘Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich,’ in Kant-Lexikon. Edited by Willaschek, M., Stozlenberg, J., Mohr, G., and Bacin, S.. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 602–3.Google Scholar
Bittner, Rüdiger and Cramer, Konrad. (Eds.) (1975) Materialien zu Kants ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft.’ Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Böning, Holder. (2016) ‘Rehberg, August Wilhelm,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 605–8.Google Scholar
Campe, Joachim Heinrich. (1801) Wörterbuch zur Erklärung und Verdeutschung der unserer Sprache aufgedrungenen fremden Ausdrücke, 2 vols. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
Chance, Brian A. and Pasternack, Lawrence. (2018) ‘Rational Faith and the Pantheism Controversy: Kant’s “Orientation Essay” and the Evolution of His Moral Argument,’ in Kant and His German Contemporaries. Volume 2. Edited by Dahlstrom, Daniel O. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew. (2007) ‘Belief in Kant.’ The Philosophical Review 116(3), pp. 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (2018) ‘The Feeling of Enthusiasm,’ in Kant and the Faculty of Feeling. Edited by Sorensen, K. and Williamson, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 184–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. (1745) Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. (1747) Weg zur Gewißheit und Zuverläßigkeit der menschlichen Erkenntniß. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. (1749) Anleitung über natürliche Begebenheiten ordentlich and vorsichtig nachzudenken, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. (1752) Epistola ad perillustrem et generosissimum dominum Ioannem Ernestum L. B. ab Hardenberg […] De summis rationis principiis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian August. (1964ff.) Die philosophischen Hauptwerke, 4 vols. Edited by Tonelli, Giorgio. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Di Giovanni, George. (2005) Freedom and Religion in Kant and His Immediate Successors: The Vocation of Humankind, 1774–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, Corey. (forthcoming) ‘Kant’s Canon, Garve’s Cicero, and the Stoic Doctrine of the Highest Good.’Google Scholar
Dyck, Corey. (Ed. and Trans.) (2019) Early Modern German Philosophy (1690–1750). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Klaus. (1966) The Genesis of German Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1765) Homo Natura non ferus. Dissertatio philosophica sectionem secundam. Erlangen.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1767) Grundriß der Philosophischen Wissenschaften nebst der nöthigen Geschichte. Coburg.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1769) Logik und Metaphysik, nebst der Philosophischen Geschichte im Grundrisse. Göttingen and Gotha.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1779–86) Untersuchungen über den menschlichen Willen, dessen Naturtriebe, Veränderlichkeit, Verhältniß zur Tugend und Glückseligkeit und die Grundregeln, die menschlichen Gemüther zu erkennen und zu regieren, 4 vols. Göttingen and Lemgo.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1782) Grundlehren zur Kenntniß des menschlichen Willens und der natürlichen Gesetze des Rechtverhaltens. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1787) Über Raum und Caussalität zur Prüfung der Kantischen Philosophie. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (1788). ‘Critik der praktischen Vernunft. Von Immanuel Kant.’ Philosophische Bibliothek. 1. Band, pp. 182–218.Google Scholar
Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. (2018). ‘Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft,’ in Ausgewählte Schriften. Edited by Nowitzki, Hans-Peter, Roth, Udo, and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 228–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, J.G.H. and Meiners, C. (Eds.) (1790) Philosophische Bibliothek. 3. Band. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Franz, Michael. (2005) ‘Johann Friedrich Flatt als Professor der Philosophie in Tübingen (1785–1792),’ in “… im Reiche des Wissens cavalieremente”? Hölderlins, Hegels und Schellings Philosophiestudium an der Universität Tübingen. Edited by Franz, Michael. Tübingen: Hölderlin-Gesellschaft, pp. 535–54.Google Scholar
Franz, Michael. (2016) ‘Wizenmann, Thomas,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 858–59.Google Scholar
Franz, Michael and Bürzele, Ralf. (2005) ‘Erläuterungen zu Böks moralphilosophischen Inauguralthesen (1790–1792),’ in “… im Reiche des Wissens cavalieremente”? Hölderlins, Hegels und Schellings Philosophiestudium an der Universität Tübingen. Edited by Franz, Michael. Tübingen: Hölderlin-Gesellschaft, pp. 128–57.Google Scholar
Frederick the Great. (2021) Philosophical Writings. Edited by Lifschitz, Avi, translated by Angela Scholar. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1766) Dissertatio de nonnullis, quae pertinent ad Logicam probabilium. Halle.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1772) Adam Fergusons Grundsätze der Moralphilosophie. Uebersetzt und mit einigen Anmerkungen versehen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1783) ‘Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant.’ Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek, Supplement to Volumes 37–52, Part II, pp. 838–62.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1787) (Trans.) Abhandlung über die menschlichen Pflichten in drey Büchern. By Cicero, Marcus Tullius. Breslau.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1787–88) Philosophische Anmerkungen und Abhandlungen zu Cicero’s Büchern von den Pflichten, 3 vols. Breslau.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1792) Versuche über verschiedene Gegenstände aus der Moral, der Litteratur und dem gesellschaftlichen Leben. Breslau.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1798) Uebersicht der vornehmsten Principien der Sittenlehre, von dem Zeitalter des Aristoteles an bis auf unsre Zeiten. Breslau.Google Scholar
Garve, Christian. (1800) ‘Über die Gränzen des bürgerlichen Gehorsams, in Beziehung auf den Auffsatz von Kant über den Gemeinspruch: das mag in der Theorie richtig seyn, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis,’ in Vermischte Aufsätze. 2. Band, pp. 389–427.Google Scholar
Gawlick, Günter, Kreimendahl, Lothar, and Stark, Werner. (Eds.) (2019) Neue Reflexionen: Die frühen Notate zu Baumgartens “Metaphysica” by Kant, Immanuel. Stuttgart Bad-Canstatt: fromann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Gesang, Bernward. (2016). ‘Pistorius, Hermann Andreas,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 589–91.Google Scholar
Gesang, Bernward. (Ed.) (2007) Kants vergessener Rezensent: Die Kritik der theoretischen und praktischen Philosophie Kants in fünf Rezensionen von Hermann Andreas Pistorius. Hamburg: Meiner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Carlos Melches. (1994) Der Einfluß von Christian Garves Übersetzung Ciceros “De officiis” auf Kants “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten.” Regensburg: S. Roderer.Google Scholar
Goy, Ina. (2015) ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft,’ in Kant-Lexikon. Edited by Willaschek, M., Stozlenberg, J., Mohr, G., and Bacin, S.. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 1315–23.Google Scholar
Gregor, Mary J. (1996) ‘Critique of Practical Reason: Introduction,’ in Practical Philosophy by Immanuel Kant. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–36.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael L. (2021) ‘A.W. Rehberg, “On the Relationship between theory and Practice.”’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 29(6), pp. 1166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael L. (2022) ‘Kant and Rehberg on Political Theory and Practice.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30(4), pp. 566–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob and Wilhelm, . (2023) Deutsches Wörterbuch von Jacob Grimm und Wilhelm Grimm. Digitalisierte Fassung im Wörterbuchnetz des Trier Center for Digital Humanities, Version 01/23. www.woerterbuchnetz.de/DWBGoogle Scholar
Grote, Simon. (2023) ‘Wolffianism and Pietism in Eighteenth-Century German Philosophy.’ Intellectual History Review 33(4), pp. 673–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunert, Frank, Hahmann, Andree, and Stiening, Gideon. (Eds.) (2021) Christian August Crusius (1715–1775): Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (2000) ‘Editor’s Introduction,’ in Critique of the Power of Judgment. By Kant, Immanuel. Edited by Guyer, Paul, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xiii–lii.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (2021) ‘The Original Empty Formalism Objection,’ in Practical Philosophy from Kant to Hegel. Edited by Clarke, James A. and Gottlieb, Gabriel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. (forthcoming) The Impact of Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häckermann, Adolf. (1888) ‘Pistorius’, in Hermann Andreas’ in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie 26, pp. 194–96. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd120198851.html#adbcontentGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. (1959) Briefwechsel. Vierter Band: 1778–82. Edited by Henkel, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Insel.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. (1965) Briefwechsel. Fünfter Band: 1783–85. Edited by Henkel, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Insel.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. (1975) Briefwechsel. Sechster Band: 1785–86. Edited by Henkel, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Insel.Google Scholar
Hamann, Johann Georg. (1979) Briefwechsel. Siebter Band: 1786–88. Edited by Henkel, Arthur. Wiesbaden: Insel.Google Scholar
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. (2020) The Political Philosophy of Fénelon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, David. (1772–73) Betrachtungen über den Menschen, 2 vols. Rostock and Leipzig: Koppe.Google Scholar
Hartley, David. (1791) Observations on Man […] To which are now added Notes and Additions to the second part; translated from the German of the Rev. Herman Andrew Pistorius, Rector of the Poseritz in the Island of Rugen. London.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. (2002) ‘Translator’s Introduction [to the Prolegomena],’ in Theoretical Philosophy after 1781 by Kant, Immanuel. Edited by Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter, translated by Gary Hatfield, Michael Friedman, Henry Allison, and Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Hatfield, Gary. (2004) ‘Introduction,’ in Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Heinze, Max. (1898) ‘Wizenmann, Thomas,’ in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie 43, pp. 678–80. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd117446122.html#adbcontentGoogle Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. (Ed.) (1967) Kant. Gentz. Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried. (Ed.) (1993) Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten: Ein kooperativer Kommentar, 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Hogan, Des. (2013) ‘Metaphysical Motives of Kant’s Analytic-Synthetic Distinction.’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 51(2), pp. 267–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, Des. (2016) ‘Crusius, Christian August,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 149–54.Google Scholar
Horace, (2011) Satires and Epistles. Translated by John Davie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobi, F.H. (1785) Ueber die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Breslau: Löwe [2nd ed. 1789].Google Scholar
Jacobi, F.H. (1789) Ueber die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Neue vermehrte Ausgabe. Breslau: Löwe.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1786) ‘Was heißt: sich im Denken orientieren?’ Berlinische Monatsschrift. 8. Band, October, pp. 304–30.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1793) ‘Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis.’ Berlinische Monatsschrift. Band 22, September, pp. 201–84.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1900ff.) Gesammelte Schriften. Vols. 1–22 edited by der Wissenschaften, Preussische Akademie, Vol. 23 edited by Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Vols. 24ff. edited by Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1968) Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. Edited by Ebbinghaus, Julius. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1992) Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. Zum ewigen Frieden: Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Edited with an Introduction by Klemme, Heiner F.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1996a) Religion and Rational Theology. Edited and translated by Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George Di. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1996b) Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (1999) Was ist Aufklärung? Ausgewählte kleine Schriften. Edited by Brandt, Horst D. with an Introduction by Cassirer, Ernst. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (2004) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Gary Hatfield. Revised ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. (2011) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kertscher, Hans Joachim. (2018) “Er brachte Licht und Ordnung in die Welt”: Christian Wolff – eine Biographie. Halle: Mitteldeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Kertscher, Hans Joachim and Stöckmann, Ernst. (Eds.) (2012) Ein Antipode Kants? Johann August Eberhard im Spannungsfeld von spätaufklärerischer Philosophie und Theologie. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2000) ‘Introduction,’ in The Reception of the Scottish Enlightenment in Germany. Volume 1: Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Erkenntniss. Edited by Sulzer, Johann Georg. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, pp. v–xii.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2003) ‘Einleitung,’ in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft by Kant, Immanuel. Edited by Brandt, Horst D. and Klemme, Heiner. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. ix–lxiii.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2006) ‘Praktische Gründe und moralische Motivation. Eine deontologische Perspektive,’ in Moralische Motivation: Kant und die Alternativen. Edited by Klemme, H. F. and Kuehn, M.. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 113–53.Google Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2010) ‘The Origin and Aim of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason,’ in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner F. (2021) ‘Critique of Practical Reason,’ in The Cambridge Kant Lexicon. Edited by Wuerth, Julian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 640–50.Google Scholar
Kraus, Hans-Christof. (2003) ‘Rehberg, August Wilhelm,’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie 21, pp. 277–78. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118743872.html#ndbcontentGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. (2001) Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. (2009) ‘Ethics and Anthropology in the Development of Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ in Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Edited by Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. (2010) ‘Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: The History and Significance of its Deferral,’ in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide. Edited by Denis, Lara. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
Kühlmann, Wilhelm. (2009) Facetten der Aufklärung in Baden: Johann Peter Hebel und die Karlsruher Lateinische Gesellschaft. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
Küttner, C.G. and Williamson, N. (1805–13) New and Complete Dictionary of the German Language for Englishmen According to the German Dictionary of Mr. J.C. Adelung, 3 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Landau, Albert. (Ed.) (1991) Rezensionen zur Kantischen Philosophie: 1781–87. Bebra: Albert Landau Verlag.Google Scholar
Liebmann, Otto. (1894) ‘Tittel, Gottlieb August,’ in Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie 38, p. 382. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd117727741.html#adbcontentGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. (1975) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mbuyi, Mukendi. (2001) Kants Tübinger Kritiker: Die Kritik von Johann Friedrich Flatt an Kants moralischen Argument für die Annahme Gottes. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. (1785) Morgenstunden oder Vorlesungen über das Daseyn Gottes. Berlin: Voß und Sohn.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. (1786) An die Freunde Lessings. Ein Anhang zu Herrn Jacobi Briefwechsel über die Lehre des Spinoza. Berlin: Voß und Sohn.Google Scholar
Morrison, James C. (Trans.) (1995) Exposition of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason by Schultz, Johann. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Kurt. (1961) ‘Feder, Georg Heinrich,’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie 5, pp. 41–42. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd100796923.html#ndbcontentGoogle Scholar
Natorp, Paul. (1913) ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft: Einleitung,’ in Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Band V. Berlin: Reimer, pp. 489–98.Google Scholar
Noller, Jörg and Walsh, John. (Eds.) (2022) Kant’s Early Critics on Freedom of the Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowitzki, Hans-Peter. (2011) ‘Denken – Sprechen – Handeln. Johann Georg Sulzers semiotische Fundierung der Allgemeinen Theorie der Schönen Künste,’ in Johann Georg Sulzer (1720–1779): Aufklärung zwischen Christian Wolff und David Hume. Edited by Grunert, Frank and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 137–68.Google Scholar
Nowitzki, H.P., Roth, U., and Stiening, G. (Eds.) (2018) Johann Georg Heinrich Feder (1740–1821): Empirismus und Popularphilosophie zwischen Wolff und Kant. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oz-Salzburger, Fania. (1995) Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pältz, Eberhard H. (1961) ‘Flatt, Johann Friedrich,’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie 5, pp. 223–24. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd115612408.html#ndbcontentGoogle Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1784) ‘Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, von Immanuel Kant.’ Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek. 59. Band, 2. Stück, pp. 322–56.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1786a) ‘Erläuterungen über des Herrn Professor Kant Critik der reinen Vernunft von Joh. Schulze, Königl. Preußischen Hofprediger.’ Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek. 66. Band, 1. Stück, pp. 92–123.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1786b). ‘Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten von Immanuel Kant.’ Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek. 66. Band, 2. Stück, pp. 447–63.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1788a) ‘Critic der reinen Vernunft von Immanuel Kant. Zweyte Auflage.’ Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek. 81. Band, 2. Stück, pp. 343–54.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1788b) ‘Prüfung der Mendelssohnschen Morgenstunden von Ludwig Heinrich Jakob. Nebst einer Abhandlung vom Herrn Professor Kant.’ Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek. 82. Band, 2. Stück, pp. 427–70.Google Scholar
Pistorius, Hermann Andreas. (1794) ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, von Immanuel Kant.’ Allgemeine Deutsche Bibliothek. 117. Band, 1. Stück, pp. 78–105.Google Scholar
Raupp, Werner. (2016) ‘Flatt, Johann Friedrich,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 219–20.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews. (2015) ‘Introduction,’ in Critique of Practical Reason by Kant, Immanuel. Edited and translated by Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. vii–xxxiv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1780) Cato oder Gespräche über die Bestimmung des Menschen. Basel.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1785) Philosophische Gespräche über das Vergnügen. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1787) Über das Verhältnis der Metaphysik zu der Religion. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1788a) ‘Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, von Immanuel Kant.’ Allgemeine Literatur Zeitung. 3. Band, Numbers 188a and 188b, Wednesday, August 6, columns 345–60.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1788b) Review of Herder: Gott. Einige Gespräche. Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. 1. Band, Number 2a, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1788c) Review of Jacobi: David Hume über den Glauben. Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. 2. Band, Number 92, pp. 105–12.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1791) Review of Reinhold: Beyträge zur Berichtigung bisheriger Mißverständnisse der Philosophen. Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Band 1, Number 26–27, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1793) Untersuchungen über die französische Revolution nebst kritischen Nachrichten von den merkwürdigsten Schriften welche darüber in Frankreich erschienen sind, 2 vols. Hanover and Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1794) ‘Über das Verhältnis der Theorie zur Praxis.’ Berlinische Monatsschrift 23, pp. 114–43.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm. (1826) Zur Geschichte des Königreichs Hannover in den ersten Jahren nach der Befreiung von der westfälischen und französischen Herrschaft. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Reich, Klaus (1939) ‘Kant and Greek Ethics (II).’ (Translated by W. H. Walsh) Mind 48, pp. 337–54.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard. (1792) Brief über die Kantische Philosophie. Zweyter Band. Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, Gabriel. (2021) ‘Dependence and Obedience: Crusius’ Concept of Obligation and its Influence on Kant’s Moral Philosophy,’ in Christian August Crusius (1715–1775): Philosophy between Reason and Revelation. Edited by Grunert, Frank, Hahmann, Andree, and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 301–18.Google Scholar
Roth, Udo and Stiening, Gideon. (Eds.) (2021) Christian Garve (1742–1798): Philosoph und Philologe der Aufklärung. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumore, Paola. (2018) ‘Kant and Crusius on the Role of Immortality in Morality,’ in Kant and His German Contemporaries. Volume 1. Edited by Dyck, Corey and Wunderlich, Falk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213–31.Google Scholar
Sala, Giovanni B. (2004) Kants “Kritik der praktischen Vernunft”: Ein Kommentar. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Saring, Hans. (1957) ‘Crusius, Christian August,’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie 3, pp. 432–33. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118677438.html#ndbcontentGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Brigitte. (Ed. and Trans.) (2000) Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schierbaum, Sonja, Walschots, Michael, and Walsh, John. (Eds.) (2024) Christian Wolff’s German Ethics: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. (1998) The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. (Ed.) (2003) Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Johann. (1771) ‘Review of Kant’s Inaugural Dissertation,’ in Königsbergsche Gelehrte und Politische Zeitungen, November, pp. 22–25.Google Scholar
Schultz, Johann. (1784) Erläuterungen über des Herrn Professor Kant Critik der reinen Vernunft. Königsberg: Dengel.Google Scholar
Schultz, Johann. (1789/1792) Prüfung der Kantischen Critik der reinen Vernunft, 2 vols. Königsberg.Google Scholar
Schulz, Eberhard Günter. (1975) Rehbergs Opposition gegen Kants Ethik. Marburg: Symon.Google Scholar
Schwaiger, Clemens. (2016) ‘Wolff, Christian,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 862–67.Google Scholar
Specht, Andrew. (2014) ‘F. A. Trendelenburg and the Neglected Alternative.’ British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22(3), pp. 514–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Nicholas F. (2022) ‘Kant’s Transcendental Idealism,’ in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism/Google Scholar
Thiel, Udo. (2016) ‘Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 204–8.Google Scholar
Thomas, Andreas. (2016) ‘Tittel, Gottlob August,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 792–93.Google Scholar
Thomasius, Christian. (2011) Institutes of Divine Jurisprudence, with Selections from Foundations of the Law of Nature and Nations. Edited and translated by Ahnert, Thomas. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. (2010) ‘Reversal or Retreat? Kant’s Deductions of Freedom and Morality,’ in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. (2019) ‘Emerging Autonomy: Dealing with the Inadequacies of the “Canon” of the Critique of Pure Reason (1781),’ in The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Edited by Bacin, S. and Sensen, O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–21.Google Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. (2022) Kant’s Will at the Crossroads: An Essay on the Failings of Practical Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonelli, Giorgio. (1969) ‘Einleitung,’ in Anweisung vernünftig zu leben by Crusius, Christian August. Hildesheim: Olms, pp. vii–lxiv.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Karl. (1951) ‘Einleitung,’ in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft by Kant, Immanuel. Edited by Vorländer, Karl. Leipzig: Meiner, pp. xi–xlvii.Google Scholar
Vorländer, Karl. (1965) ‘Einleitung,’ in Grundlegung der Metaphysik der Sitten by Kant, Immanuel. Edited by Vorländer, Karl. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. v–xxvii.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael. (2020) ‘Merely a New Formula? G.A. Tittel on Kant’s Reform of Moral Science.’ Studi Kantiani 33, pp. 49–64.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael. (2021a) ‘Kant and Consequentialism in Context: The Second Critique’s Response to Pistorius.’ Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103(2), pp. 313–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walschots, Michael. (2021b) ‘Crusius on Freedom of the Will,’ in Christian August Crusius (1715–1775): Philosophy Between Reason and Revelation. Edited by Grunert, Frank and Hahmann, Andree. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walschots, Michael. (2021c) ‘Garves Eudämonismus [Garve’s Eudaimonism],’ in Christian Garve (1742–1798): Philosopher and Philologist of the Enlightenment. Edited by Grunert, F. and Stiening, G.. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 171–82.Google Scholar
Walschots, Michael. (2022) ‘Achtung in Kant and Smith.’ Kant-Studien 133(2), pp. 238–68.Google Scholar
Walsh, John. (forthcoming) ‘C.C.E. Schmid’s Intelligible Fatalism in Context,’ in Carl Christian Erhard Schmid (1761–1812): Spätaufklärung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Leibniz und Kant. Edited by Heinz, Marion and Stiening, Gideon. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric. (2001) ‘Kant on Rational Cosmology,’ in Kant and the Sciences. Edited by Watkins, Eric. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric. (Ed. and Trans.) (2009) Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus. (2010) ‘The Primacy of Practical Reason and the Idea of a Practical Postulate,’ in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Edited by Reath, Andrews and Timmermann, Jens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–96.Google Scholar
Wizenmann, Thomas. (1782) Göttliche Entwicklung des Satans durch das Menschengeschlecht. Dessau: Buchhandlung der Gelehrten.Google Scholar
Wizenmann, Thomas. (1786) Die Resultate der Jacobischer und Mendelssohnischer Philosophie; kritisch untersucht von einem Freywilligen. Leipzig: Göschen.Google Scholar
Wizenmann, Thomas. (1787) ‘To Herr Professor Kant.’ Deutsches Museum. 1. Band, 2. Stück, February, pp. 116–56.Google Scholar
Wölfel, Kurt. (1964) ‘Garve, Christian,’ in Neue Deutsche Biographie 6, pp. 77–78. www.deutsche-biographie.de/pnd118537636.html#ndbcontentGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (1703) Philosophia practica universalis, mathematica methodo conscripta. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (1713) Vernünfftige Gedancken von den Kräfften des menschlichen Verstandes und ihrem richtigen Gebrauche in Erkänntnis der Wahrheit. Halle.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (1720a) Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt. Halle [2003 – Reprint of the 1751 edition, Hildesheim: Olms].Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (1720b) Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen, zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseeligkeit, den Liebhabern der Wahrheit mitgetheilet. Halle [2006 – Reprint of the third edition from 1728, Hildesheim: Olms].Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (1770) Logic, or Rational Thoughts on the Powers of the Human Understanding, with their Use and Application in the Knowledge and Search of Truth. London: Hawes, Clarke, and Collins.Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian. (2006) Vernünfftige Gedancken von der Menschen Thun und Lassen, zu Beförderung ihrer Glückseeligkeit. With an Introduction by Arndt, Hans Werner. Hildesheim: Olms [Reprint of the original fourth edition from 1733 (first edition 1720)].Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2002) ‘Preface and Introduction (3–16),’ in Immanuel Kant: Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Edited by Höffe, Otfried. Berlin: Akademie, pp. 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen W. (2006) ‘The Supreme Moral Principle,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 342–80.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Falk. (2016) ‘Garve, Christian,’ in The Bloomsbury Dictionary of Eighteenth-Century German Philosophers. Edited by Klemme, Heiner F. and Kuehn, Manfred. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 246–51.Google Scholar
Xenophon, . (1914) Cyropaedia. Volume 2. Translated by Walter Miller. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Arnulf. (2002) ‘Albrecht Von Haller: “Uncompleted Poem on Eternity.”’ The Philosophical Forum 33, pp. 304–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Arnulf. (Ed. and Trans.) (1999) Correspondence by Kant, Immanuel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar