Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:01:57.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction: Kant and the Fate of Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Karl Ameriks
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

How it could happen that a whole epoch of philosophers, from Reinhold to Hegel, was of the opinion that philosophy must be deduced from one proposition – this has still remained unclear to me, and I have as yet found no answer for it in the literature.

Near the end of his life, a public challenge was issued to Kant in the anonymous review of an obscure work, Johann Gottlieb Bohle's Entwurf der Transcendental-Philosophie (Göttingen, 1798):

Kant is the first teacher of Transcendental Philosophy and Reinhold the admirable disseminator ofthe critical doctrine; but the first true transcendental philosopher is undeniably Fichte. For Fichte has realized what the Critique proposed, carrying out systematically the transcendental idealism which Kant projected. How natural therefore is the public's desire that the originator of the Critique declare openly his opinion of the work of his worthy pupil!

In an unusual public reply, Kant issued an impassioned statement that insisted on distinguishing the latest fashions from “the common standpoint” of his own philosophy:

Since the reviewer finally maintains that the Critique is not to be taken literally in what it says about sensibility and that anyone who wants to understand the Critique must first master the requisite standpoint (of Beck or of Fichte), because Kant's precise words, like Aristotle's, will destroy the spirit, I therefore declare again that the Critique is to be understood by considering exactly what it says and that it requires only the common standpoint that any mind sufficiently cultivated in abstract investigations will bring to it.

Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and the Fate of Autonomy
Problems in the Appropriation of the Critical Philosophy
, pp. 1 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×