Book contents
- Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Theory of Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Introduction
- Part I Theory
- Part II Interference in Minority Affairs: Physical Harm
- Part III Interference in Minority Affairs: Non-physical Harm
- Part IV Country Case Studies
- 9 Multiculturalism v. Security Considerations
- 10 Multiculturalism v. Security Considerations
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
9 - Multiculturalism v. Security Considerations
Behind the French Veil of Ignorance
from Part IV - Country Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2021
- Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgements
- Theory of Just, Reasonable Multiculturalism
- Introduction
- Part I Theory
- Part II Interference in Minority Affairs: Physical Harm
- Part III Interference in Minority Affairs: Non-physical Harm
- Part IV Country Case Studies
- 9 Multiculturalism v. Security Considerations
- 10 Multiculturalism v. Security Considerations
- Conclusion
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Debates over citizenship, immigration, colonial memory, the reform of the state, the historiography of modern France, terrorism and security, and the complicated relationship between state and church have been exploited by politicians and galvanized society. Many of these debates are around the political concepts of republicanism, neutrality, and the spirit of laïcité which structure the vocabulary of French political actors and of ordinary citizens. In France, majority rule infringes on the rights of minorities. This chapter probes the debates concerning cultural policies in France in the face of what its government perceives as a challenge to its national raison d’être, including those revolving around the burqa, the niqab and the burkini. Freedom of religion is restricted to the private sphere while secularism is celebrated in the public sphere. It is argued that the burqa and niqab ban is neither just nor reasonable in the eyes of these women and girls, their families and community, and that paternalism that holds that the ban is for the women’s own good is a poor, coercive excuse. Claims for paternalistic coercion to protect adult women from their own culture when they do not ask for protection are not sufficiently reasonable to receive vindication.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Just, Reasonable MulticulturalismLiberalism, Culture and Coercion, pp. 237 - 276Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021