Book contents
- ASCL Studies In Comparative Law
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Advances in Lay Participation
- Part II Enduring Systems of Lay Participation
- Part III Challenges to Lay Participation in Law
- Part IV Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
- 14 What Hollywood, USA, Teaches the World (Incorrectly and Correctly) about Juries
- 15 The Case for a Hybrid Jury in Europe
- 16 A Worldwide Perspective on Lay Participation
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
14 - What Hollywood, USA, Teaches the World (Incorrectly and Correctly) about Juries
from Part IV - Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 August 2021
Book contents
- ASCL Studies In Comparative Law
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed Courts
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Editors
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Advances in Lay Participation
- Part II Enduring Systems of Lay Participation
- Part III Challenges to Lay Participation in Law
- Part IV Global Perspectives on Lay Participation
- 14 What Hollywood, USA, Teaches the World (Incorrectly and Correctly) about Juries
- 15 The Case for a Hybrid Jury in Europe
- 16 A Worldwide Perspective on Lay Participation
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
This chapter examines American jury films and what they teach the world about American juries. Some of the lessons they offer are instructive, but others do not comport with American juries in practice. One persistent and misleading message of jury films is that juries include a holdout juror, even though holdout jurors occur infrequently on actual juries. The most famous American jury film, 12 Angry Men, teaches this lesson; however, it also shows a jury that ultimately works hard to arrive at a responsible verdict, which is what most actual juries try to do. This film is enjoying an extraordinary renaissance; it is being remade into foreign versions across the globe. This chapter also explores how 12 Angry Men serves as a window into American juries; foreign remakes of it also provide a window into the aspirations of countries around the world.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Juries, Lay Judges, and Mixed CourtsA Global Perspective, pp. 285 - 303Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Asimow, M. (2007). 12 angry men: A revisionist view. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 711–716.Google Scholar
Balashov, A., Gurevich, S. (Producers), & Mikhalkov, N. (Director). (2007). 12 [Motion picture]. Russia: Mosfilm Studios.Google Scholar
Boatright, R. G. (1998). Improving citizen response to jury summonses: A report with recommendations. Chicago: American Judicature Society.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (Producer), & Capra, F. (Director). (1939). Mr. Smith goes to Washington [Motion picture]. United States: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
Capra, F. (Producer), & Capra, F.(1946). It’s a wonderful life [Motion picture]. United States: Liberty Films.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, B. (Producer), & Chatterjee, B. (Director). (1986). Ek ruka hua faisla [A pending decision] [Television film]. India: Eagle Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
Clover, C. J.(1998b). God bless juries! In Browne, N (Ed.), Refiguring American film genres: History and theory (pp. 255–277). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Daccache, Z. (Producer), & Daccache, Z. (Director). (2009). 12 angry Lebanese: The documentary [Motion picture]. Lebanon: Catharsis-LCDT.Google Scholar
Davey, M., & Saulny, S. (2010, August 19). Jurors fault complexity of the Blagojevich trial. New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S. (1993). What jurors think: Expectations and reactions of citizens who serve as jurors. In Litan, R. E. (Ed.), Verdict: Assessing the civil jury system (pp. 282–305). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Diamond, S. S., Rose, M. R., & Murphy, B. (2006). Revisiting the unanimity requirement: The behavior of the non-unanimous civil jury. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 201–230.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. C. (2003). One inspiring jury. Michigan Law Review, 101, 1387–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonda, H., Rose, R. (Producers), & Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 angry men [Motion picture]. United States: Orion-Nova Productions.Google Scholar
Fufang, W. (Executive Producer), & Xu, A. (Director). (2015). 12 citizens [Motion picture]. China: Juben Production Company.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. (2018, February 14). Can El Chapo get a fair trial? Vice News. https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/7x7x3a/can-el-chapo-get-a-fair-trialGoogle Scholar
Hannaford-Agor, P. L., Hans, V. P., Mott, N. L., & Munsterman, G. T. (2002). Are hung juries a problem? Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Hans, V. P., & Vidmar, N.(1991). The American jury at twenty-five years. Law and Social Inquiry, 16, 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jimeno-Bulnes, M. (2007). A different story line for 12 angry men: Verdicts reached by majority rule – The Spanish perspective. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 759–775.Google Scholar
Kahn, H. (Producer), & Kaufman, P. A. (Director). (2010). One angry juror [Television film]. United States: Front Street Pictures and Lifetime Television.Google Scholar
Kalven, H., Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1988). The American jury on trial: Psychological perspectives. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
MacKillop, K., & Vidmar, N. (2015). Decision-making in the dark: How pre-trial errors change the narrative in criminal jury trials. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 90, 957–980.Google Scholar
Makinen, J. (2015, September 23). “12 angry men,” 1 happy director; despite some dire predictions, Chinese filmmaker completes remake of US classic. Los Angeles Times, p. E1.Google Scholar
Mangat, L. (2018). A jury of your [redacted]: The rise and implications of anonymous juries. Cornell Law Review, 103, 1621–1649.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S. (2001). Juries and technology: Equipping jurors for the twenty-first century. Brooklyn Law Review, 66, 1257–1299.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2007a). Introduction to the 50th anniversary of 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 557–576.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(Ed.). (2007b). Symposium: The 50th anniversary of 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 551–899.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2007c). The banality of evil: A portrayal in 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 887–899.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2011). Two weeks at the Old Bailey: Jury lessons from England. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 86, 537–583.Google Scholar
Marder, N. S.(2018). Juries in film and television. In Pontell, H. N. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. G., Meledandri, C., & Gordon, M. (Producers), & Gould, H. (Director). (1994). Trial by jury [Motion picture]. United States: Morgan Creek Productions.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1972). Twelve angry men. In Garrett, G. P., Hardison, O. B., & Gelfman, J. R. (Eds.), Film scripts two (pp. 156–337). Milwaukee, WI: Applause Theatre & Cinema Books.Google Scholar
St. Clair, S. (2010, August 27). Blagojevich holdout explains vote. Chicago Tribune, p. 1.Google Scholar
Simon, R. J. (1992). Jury nullification, or prejudice and ignorance in the Marion Barry trial. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 261–266.Google Scholar
Thaman, S. C. (2007). The good, the bad, or the indifferent: 12 angry men in Russia. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 791–808.Google Scholar
Vidmar, N., Beale, S. S., Chemerinsky, E., & Coleman, J. E. (2007). Was he guilty as charged? An alternative narrative based on the circumstantial evidence from 12 angry men. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 82, 691–710.Google Scholar
Winkler, I., & Cowan, R. (Producers), & Gibson, B. (Director). (1996). The juror [Motion picture]. United States: Sony Pictures Entertainment.Google Scholar
Zeisel, H. (1971). … And then there were none: The diminution of the federal jury. University of Chicago Law Review, 38, 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar