Abma, R. 1977. “Het Plan van de Arbeid en de SDAP.” Bijdragen en Mededelingen Betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 92: 37–68.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Akami, Tomoko. 2016. “A Quest to Be Global: The League of Nations Health Organization and Inter-Colonial Regional Governing Agendas of the Far Eastern Association of Tropical Medicine 1910–25.” International History Review 38 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar

Akkerboom, Broer. 2015. “De Tinbergennorm Bestaat Niet.” MeJudice, 2015. www.mejudice.nl/artikelen/detail/de-tinbergennorm-bestaat-niet.Google Scholar

Alberts, Gerard. 1994. “On Connecting Socialism and Mathematics: Dirk Struik, Jan Burgers, and Jan Tinbergen.” Historia Mathematica 21 (3): 280–305.Google Scholar

Alberts, Gerard, and Weeder, Pieter. 1988. Distantie en Engagement: Jan Tinbergen Autobiografisch. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar

Alexeyeva, Ludmilla, and Goldberg, Paul. 1993. The Thaw Generation: Coming of Age in the Post-Stalin Era. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Algemeene Nederlandsche Bond “Vrede door Recht.” 1913. Het Vredespaleis: Gedenkboek: Ten Dage van de Plechtige Opening op 28 Augustus 1913. ’s-Gravenhage: Belinfante.Google Scholar

Ames, Edward. 1965. “Review of Central Planning by Jan Tinbergen.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 361: 167–68.Google Scholar

Andvig, Jens Christopher. 1988. “From Macrodynamics to Macroeconomic Planning: A Basic Shift in Ragnar Frisch’s Thinking?” European Economic Review 32: 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous. “Review of Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen.” 1963. The International Executive 5 (1): 27–30.Google Scholar

Anonymous. 1927. A “Een Gesprek met Hendrik de Man, de Eerste Sekretaris Der Sosialistiese Jeugdinternationale.” 1927. Het Jonge Volk 14: 194.Google Scholar

Arndt, H. W. 1987. Economic Development: The History of an Idea. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Asbeck, F. M. Baron, Tinbergen, Jan, and Verzijl, J. H. W.. 1946. Bouwstof Voor de Oplossing van Na-Oorlogsche Vraagstukken. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Assous, Michaël, and Carret, Vincent. 2020. “(In)Stability at the Cowles Commission.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 27: 1–39.Google Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E., and Bateman, Bradley W.. 2011. Capitalist Revolutionary: John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backhouse, Roger E., and Giraud, Yann. 2010. “Circular Flow Diagrams.” In Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, edited by Blaug, Mark and Lloyd, Peter, 221–29. Northhampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Balabkins, Nicholas. 1968. “Soviet-American Convergence by A.D. 2000? An Analysis of the Trends of Two Social Orders.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 10: 133–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balabkins, Nicholas. 1992. “Measuring Soviet Economic Growth: Old Problems and New Complications. A Comment.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 148 (1): 93–97.Google Scholar

Balisciano, Márcia L. 1998. “Hope for America: American Notions of Economic Planning between Pluralism and Neoclassicism, 1930–1950.” History of Political Economy 30 (Annual Supplement): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balogh, T. 1964. “Education and Economic Growth: Comments on Professor Tinbergen’s Planning ‘Model.’” Kyklos 17: 261–74.Google Scholar

Baneke, David Maarten. 2008. Synthetisch Denken: Natuurwetenschappers over hun Rol in een Moderne Maatschappij 1900-1940. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Bank, Jan. 1978. Opkomst en Ondergang van de Nederlandse Volksbeweging. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Batenburg, Paul, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Income Distribution: A Correction and a Generalization.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 120 (2): 361–65.Google Scholar

Bauer, Otto. 1931. Kapitalismus und Sozialismus nach dem Weltkrieg. Wien: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Bergstrand, J. H., and Egger, P.. 2013. “Gravity Equations and Economic Frictions in the World Economy.” In Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, edited by Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D., and Kreickemeier, U., 532–70. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bijnsdorp, Ine, Ermers, Ria, and Kenkhuis, Hennie. 1985. De Wapens Neder 1. Nijmegen: De Haktol.Google Scholar

Bjerkholt, Olav. 1995. Foundations of Econometrics: The Selected Essays of Ragnar Frisch. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Bockman, Johanna, and Bernstein, Michael A.. 2008. “Scientific Community in a Divided World: Economists, Planning, and Research Priority during the Cold War.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 50 (3): 581–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogaard, Adrienne van den. 1999. “Past Measurements and Future Prediction.” In Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science, edited by Morgan, Mary S. and Morison, Margaret, 282–326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bogaard, Adrienne van den. 2001. “Economie als Wiskundige Abstractie of als Uitdrukking van Zingeving? Strijdende Visies bij het Ontstaan van het Centraal Planbureau.” Gewina 24: 225–41.Google Scholar

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen. 1924. “Macht oder ökonomisch Gesetz.” In Gesammelte Schriften von Eugen von Böhm Bawerk, edited by Weiss, Franz X., 230–300. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar

Boianovsky, Mauro. 2019. “Arthur Lewis and the Classical Foundations of Development Economics.” Research in the History and Methodology of Economic Thought 37 (A): 103–43.Google Scholar

Boianovsky, Mauro, and Hoover, Kevin D.. 20019. “The Neoclassical Growth Model and Twentieth-Century Economics.” History of Political Economy 41 (Annual Supplement): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boianovsky, Mauro, and Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 2006. “Haberler, the League of Nations, and the Quest for Consensus in Business Cycle Theory in the 1930s.” History of Political Economy 38 (1): 45–89.Google Scholar

Boomen, Gerard van den. 1983. Honderd Jaar Vredesbeweging in Nederland. Amstelveen: Uitgeverij Luyten.Google Scholar

Bouma, Nienke, Bernard, M. S. van Praag, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. “Testing and Applying a Theory of Utility: An Attempt to Decompose Income in Compensatory and Scarcity Rents.” European Economic Review 8: 181–91.Google Scholar

Boumans, Marcel. 1992. A Case of Limited Physics Transfer: Jan Tinbergen’s Resources for Re-shaping Economics. Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar

Boumans, Marcel. 2003. “Jan Tinbergen.” In Biografisch Woordenboek van Het Socialisme en de Arbeidersbeweging in Nederland, 8: 296–301. Amsterdam: IISG. https://socialhistory.org/bwsa/biografie/tinbergen.Google Scholar

Boumans, Marcel. 2019. “Econometrics: The Keynes–Tinbergen Controversy.” In The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes, edited by Dimand, Robert W. and Hagemann, Harald, 283–89. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Boumans, Marcel, and Dupont-Kieffer, Ariane. 2011. “A History of the Histories of Econometrics.” History of Political Economy 43 (Annual Supplement): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boumans, Marcel, and De Marchi, Neil. 2018. “Models, Measurement, and ‘Universal Patterns’: Jan Tinbergen and Development Planning without Theory.” History of Political Economy 50 (S1): 231–48.Google Scholar

Brandsma, Margriet. 1996. Jan Pronk: Rebel Met Een Missie. Amsterdam: Scheffers.Google Scholar

Brolsma, Marjet. 2015. “‘Het Humanitaire Moment.’ Nederlandse Intellectuelen, de Eerste Wereldoorlog En de Crisis van de Europese Beschaving (1914–1930).” Dissertation, University of Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.477826.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1959. “Positive Economics, Welfare Economics, and Political Economy.” The Journal of Law and Economics 2: 124–38.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James M. 1979. “What Should Economists Do?” Southern Economic Journal 30: 213–22.Google Scholar

Bulutoğlu, K. 1967. “Financing Turkey’s Development.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 181–214. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar

Busch, Joel H. 1968. “Book Review of Gunnar Myrdal’s Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations.” The Australian Quarterly 40 (4): 118–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butter, Frank A. G., and Maas, Harro. 2011. “From Expert Judgment to Model Based Monetary Analysis: The Case of the Dutch Central Bank in the Postwar Period.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, no. 11–161/3.Google Scholar

Casimir, Hendrik B. G. 1983. Haphazard Reality: Half a Century of Science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek. 2001. Tweehonderd Jaar Statistiek in Tijdreeksen 1800–1999. Amsterdam: IISG.Google Scholar

Chakravarty, Sukhamoy. 1989. “Nicholas Kaldor on Indian Economic Problems.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 13: 237–44.Google Scholar

Clavin, Patricia. 2015. Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clavin, Patricia, and Wessels, Jens Wilhelm. 2005. “Transnationalism and the League of Nations: Understanding the Work of Its Economic and Financial Organisation.” Contemporary European History 14 (4): 465–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cleeff, Ed van. 1929. “Hendrik de Man’s Die Intellektuellen und der Sozialismus.” Regeneratie: Maandschrift Voor Praktisch-Idealisme 10 (10): 294–300.Google Scholar

Cleeff, Ed van. 1931. “Het Sociaal-Ekonomies Wereldkongres.” Regeneratie: Maandschrift voor Praktisch-Idealisme 12 (10): 306–9.Google Scholar

Commissie uit N.V.V. en S.D.A.P. 1936. “Het Plan van de Arbeid.” Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Cooper, Malcolm. 2000. “The Legacy of Atatürk: Turkish Political Structures and Policy-Making.” International Affairs 78 (1): 115–28.Google Scholar

Cornelisse, Peter A. 1964. “The Volume of East-West Trade.” Co-Existence 1: 99–106.Google Scholar

Cornelisse, Peter A., and Tilanus, C. B.. 1966. “The Semi-Input-Output Method: With an Application to Turkish Data.” De Economist 114: 521–33.Google Scholar

Craver, Earlene. 1986. “Patronage and the Directions of Research in Economics: The Rockefeller Foundation in Europe, 1924–1938.” Minerva 24 (2): 205–22.Google Scholar

Dalen, Harry van, and Klamer, Arjo. 1996. Telgen van Tinbergen: Het Verhaal van de Nederlandse Economen. Amsterdam: Balans.Google Scholar

Dekker, Erwin. 2019. “Parallel Lives: Jan Tinbergen and Ragnar Frisch.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (2): 65–85.Google Scholar

Dekker, Erwin. 2021. “Jan Tinbergen and the Construction of an International Economic Order.” In Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe, edited by Mendes de Cunha, Alexandre and Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo, 117–37. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Derksen, J. B. D. 1940. “Het Onderzoek van het Nationale Inkomen.” De Economist 89: 571–94.Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain. 2002. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dimand, Robert W. 2005. “Fisher, Keynes, and the Corridor of Stability.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64: 185–99.Google Scholar

Dimand, Robert W., and Bateman, Bradley W.. 2016. “John Maynard Keynes Narrates the Great Depression: His Reports to the Philips Electronics Firm.” Charles Gide Conference, Strassbourg.Google Scholar

Dimand, Robert W., and Veloce, William. 2007. “Charles F. Roos, Harold T. Davis and the Quantitative Approach to Business Cycle Analysis at the Cowles Commission in the 1930s and Early 1940s.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14: 519–42.Google Scholar

DIW Berlin. 2015. Geschichte Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 1925–2015. Berlin: DIW.Google Scholar

Dodge, Peter. 1979. Hendrik de Man, Socialist Critic of Marxism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Doel, J. C. van den. 1971. “Konvergentie en Evolutie: De Konvergentietheorie van Tinbergen en de Evolutie van Ekonomische Ordes in Oost en West.” Dissertation, Nederlandse Economische Hogeschool.Google Scholar

Doel, J. C., de Galan, C., and Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. “Pleidooi voor een Geleide Loonpolitiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 61 (3044): 264–68.Google Scholar

Don, F. J. H. 2019. “The Influence of Jan Tinbergen on Dutch Economic Policy.” De Economist 167 (3): 259–82.Google Scholar

Düppe, Till. 2016. “Koopmans in the Soviet Union: A Travel Report of the Summer of 1965.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 38 (1): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrenfest, Anna Galinka. 1972. “De Ooievaarsregeling (Contra Mina).” Hollands Maandblad 13 (298): 13–16.Google Scholar

Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana. 1924. Wat Kan en Moet het Meetkunde-Onderwijs aan een Niet-Wiskundige Geven? Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar

Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana. 1960. Didactische Opstellen Wiskunde. Zutphen: N. V. W. J. Thieme.Google Scholar

Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa, Tatjana, and Freudenthal, Hans. 1951. Kan het Wiskundeonderwijs tot Opvoeding van het Denkvermogen Bijdragen? Purmerend: Muuses.Google Scholar

Ehrenfreund, Max. 2019. “The World Economy as Scientific Object, 1930–1939.” HSS Meetings 2019 Utrecht. Harvard.Google Scholar

Ellman, Michael. 1980. “Against Convergence.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 4: 199–210.Google Scholar

Emre, Yunus. 2014. The Emergence of Social Democracy in Turkey: The Left and the Transformation of the Republican People’s Party. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Ennerfelt, P. Göran. 1965. “Review of Central Planning by Jan Tinbergen.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 67 (3): 258–60.Google Scholar

Eralp, Atila. 1994. “Turkey in Changing Postwar World Order Strategies of Development and Westernization.” In Developmentalism and Beyond: Society and Politics in Egypt and Turkey, edited by Öncü, Ayşe, Keyder, Çağlar, and Ibrahim, Saad Eddin, 204–29. Cairo: American University Press.Google Scholar

Erder, Necat. 2003. Plânlı Kalkınma Serüveni: 1960’larda Türkiye’de Plânlama Deneyimi (Panel Discussion). Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Erickson, Paul, Klein, Judy L., Daston, Lorraine, Lemov, Rebecca, Sturm, Thomas, and Gordin, Michael D.. 2015. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Eroğul, Cem. 1987. “The Establishment of Multiparty Rule: 1945–1971.” In Turkey in Transition, edited by Schick, Irvin C. and Tonak, Ertuğrul Ahmet, 101–43. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eyffinger, Arthur, and den Hengst, Jan. 1988. Het Vredespaleis. Amsterdam: Sijthoff.Google Scholar

Fleddérus, Mary L., and van Kleeck, Mary. 1931. World Social Economic Planning: The Necessity for Planned Adjustment of Productive Capacity and Standards of Living. The Hague: International Industrial Relations Institute.Google Scholar

Frank, Andre Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Frank, Leonhard. 1925. De Burger. Amsterdam: N. V. Ontwikkeling.Google Scholar

Friedman, Walter. 2013. Fortune Tellers: The Story of America’s First Economic Forecasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1931. “Plan eller Kaos.” Tidens Tegn, November 1931.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1932. New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1934. Statistical Confluence Analysis by Means of Complete Regression Systems. Oslo: Universitetets økonomiske Institut.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1949. “Memorandum on Price-Wage-Tax Subsidy Policy as Instruments in Maintaining Optimal Employment.” United Nations Sub-commission on Employment and Economic Stability, 18 April. New York. Reprinted at www.maggs.com/departments/modern_books_and_manuscripts/all_categories/234346/.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1962. “Preface to the Oslo Channel Model.” In Europe’s Future in Figures, edited by Geary, R. C., 248–86. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Frisch, Ragnar. 1995. “Autonomy of Economic Relations: Statistical versus Theoretical Relations in Economic Macrodynamics.” In The Foundations of Econometric Analysis, edited by Hendry, David F. and Morgan, Mary S., 407–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1967. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1969. “Myrdal’s Mythology: ‘Modernism’ and the Third World.” Encounter 33 (July): 26–34.Google Scholar

Ginneken, Jac van. 1917. De Roman van een Kleuter. Nijmegen: Malmberg.Google Scholar

Goedhart, Theo, Halberstadt, Victor, Kapteyn, Arie, and van Praag, Bernard M. S.. 1977. “The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement.” The Journal of Human Resources 12: 503–20.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Crauford D. 2014. Walter Lippmann: Public Economist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goudriaan, J. 1933. Socialisme zonder Dogma’s. Haarlem: H. D. Tjeenk Willink & Zoon.Google Scholar

Group of Experts. 1960. Programming Techniques for Economic Development with Special Reference to Asia and the Far East. Bangkok: United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East.Google Scholar

Haberler, Gottfried. 1937. Prosperity and Depression: A Theoretical Analysis of Cyclical Movements. Geneva: League of Nations: Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar

Haberler, Gottfried, Meade, James E., Oliveira de Campos, Roberto, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. Trends in International Trade. Geneva: GATT.Google Scholar

Hagen, T. J. 1963. “Het Plan van een Grootmeester.” Paraat 18: 311–12.Google Scholar

Hahn, Hans, Neurath, Otto, and Carnap, Rudolf. 1979. “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis.” In Otto Neurath: Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung, Sozialismus und logischer Empirismus, edited by Hegelsmann, Rainer, 79–101. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Hakker, W., and van Tijn, B.. 1924. “Kentering.” Kentering 1 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar

Hamburger, L. 1929. “Boekbespreking van J. Tinbergen’s Minimumproblemen in de Natuurkunde en de Economie.” De Economist 78: 623–25.Google Scholar

Hanau, Arthur. 1928. “Die Prognose der Schweinepreise.” Vierteljahreshefte zur Konjunkturforschung, Sonderheft no. 7.Google Scholar

Hansen, Bent. 1969. “Jan Tinbergen: An Appraisal of His Contributions to Economics.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 71 (4): 325–36.Google Scholar

Harrod, R. F. 1970. “Harrod after Twenty-One Years: A Comment.” The Economic Journal 80 (319): 737–41.Google Scholar

Hart, Albert G., Kaldor, Nicholas, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. The Case for an International Commodity Reserve Currency. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar

Hartmans, Rob. 1991. “Van ‘wetenschappelijk Socialisme’ naar Wetenschap en Socialisme. De Ideologische Heroriëntering van de SDAP in de Jaren Dertig.” In Het Twaalfde Jaarboek voor het Democratisch Socialisme, edited by Krop, Marnix, Ros, Martin, Stuiveling, Saskia, and Tromp, Bart, 17–46. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Heckman, James J. 2019. “The Race between Demand and Supply: Tinbergen’s Pioneering Studies of Earnings Inequality.” De Economist 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heering, G. J., Tjalsma, P. D., and de Heer-Cremer, A. L.. 1948. De Remonstrantste Broederschap: Wat zij is en Wat zij Wil. Lochem: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar

Hendry, David F., and Morgan, Mary S.. 1995. The Foundations of Econometric Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hershlag, Zvi Yehuda. 1968. Economic Planning in Turkey. Istanbul: Economic Research Foundation.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Albert O. 2013. “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics.” In The Essential Hirschman, edited by Adelman, Jeremy, 49–73. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hollestelle, Marijn. 2011. Paul Ehrenfest: Worstelingen met de Moderne Wetenschap, 1912–1933. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Hoover, Kevin D. 2004. “Lost Causes.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 149–64.Google Scholar

Horn, Gerd-Rainer. 1996. European Socialists Respond to Fascism: Ideology, Activism and Contingency in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hueting, Roefie. 1968. “Welvaartsparadoxen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 53 (2636): 263–64.Google Scholar

Human Development Report Team. 2010. Human Development Report 2010. The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. Population and Development Review. Vol. 21. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Jansen van Galen, John. 1985. “Doorbraak: Het Plan in de Herinnering van Tijdgenoten.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, 156–93. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

Johansen, Leif. 1974. “Establishing Preference Function for Macroeconomic Decision Models: Some Observations on Ragnar Frisch’s Contributions.” European Economic Review 5: 41–66.Google Scholar

Jolink, Albert, and Barendrecht-Tinbergen, Els. 1993. Gedeelde Herinneringen. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.Google Scholar

Jong, A. H. M., van Paridon, C. W. A. M., and Passenier, J.. 1988. “Jan Tinbergen over zijn Jaren op het CPB.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 73 (3664): 653–62.Google Scholar

Jong, Fr. de. 1961. “Naar een Socialistisch Plan.” Socialisme en Democratie 18 (1): 3–12.Google Scholar

Jong, J. J. P.. 1986. “De Nederlands-Indonesische Betrekkingen 1963–1985.” Internationale Spectator 40 (2): 129–38.Google Scholar

Jong, Loe. 1969. Het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden in de Tweede Wereldoorlog 1939–1945, Deel 2: Neutraal. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Joor, Johan. 2013. “The Way of the Law above the Way of Violence.” In The Building of Peace: A Hundred Years of Work on Peace through Law, edited by Duynstee, Bob, Meijer, Daan, and Tilanus, Floris, 15–285. Den Haag: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar

Juliana, Hare Majesteit Koninging. 1955. De Welvaart der Wereld als Gemeenschappelijke Verantwoordelijkheid. Amsterdam: De Nederlandse Jeugd Gemeenschap.Google Scholar

Kamp, J. E. van. 2005. Dien Hoetink: “Bij Benadering.” Biografie van een Landbouw-Juriste in Crisis en Oorlogstijd. Groningen: Nederlands Agronomisch Historisch Instituut.Google Scholar

Kansu, Günal. 2004. Planli Yillar: Anilarla DPT’nin Öyküsü. Istanbul: Türkiye Iş Bankasi.Google Scholar

Kayzel, Tom. 2019. “A Night Train in Broad Daylight: Changing Economic Expertise at the Dutch Central Planning Bureau 1945–1977.” Oeconomia 9 (2): 337–70.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. 1973. “The Soviet Debate on the Convergence of the American & Soviet Systems.” Polity 6: 174–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kesik, Ahmet. 2015. “Development Planning in Turkey: An Assessment.” In Economic Planning and Industrial Policy in the Globalizing Economy, edited by Yülek, Murat, 77–113. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Keulen, Sjoerd J. 2014. Monumenten van Beleid: De Wisselwerking tussen Nederlandse Rijksoverheid, Sociale Wetenschappen en Politieke Cultuur, 1945–2002. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. 1991. “A Precursor to Muth: Tinbergen’s 1932 Model of Rational Expectations.” The Economic Journal 101 (408): 1245–53.Google Scholar

Keyder, Çağlar. 1987. “Economic Development and Crisis: 1950–1980.” In Turkey in Transition, edited by Schick, Irvin C. and Tonak, Ertuğrul Ahmet, 293–308. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1920. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1939. “Professor Tinbergen’s Method.” The Economic Journal 49 (195): 558–77.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard. 1963. Essays in Persuasion. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Klein, Martin J. 1958. “Ehrenfest Comes to Leiden.” Delta 5 (4): 5–14.Google Scholar

Klein, Martin J. 1981. “Not by Discoveries Alone: The Centennial of Paul Ehrenfest.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 106 (1–2): 3–14.Google Scholar

Klein, Martin J. 1985. Paul Ehrenfest: The Making of a Theoretical Physicist. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Klein, Martin J. 1989. “Physics in the Making in Leiden: Paul Ehrenfest as Teacher.” In Physics in the Making: Essays on Developments in 20th Century Physics, edited by Sarlemijn, A. and Sparnaay, M. J., 29–44. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Klomp, H. A. 1997. De Relativiteitstheorie in Nederland: Breekijzer voor Democratisering in het Interbellum. Amsterdam: Epsilon.Google Scholar

Knegtmans, Peter Jan. 2008. “Voor Wetenschap en Maatschappij. Het Zelfbeeld van Studenten in de Sociaal-Democratische Studentenclubs.” In Keurige Wereldbestormers, edited by Dorsman, L. J. and Knegtmans, Peter Jan, 39–52. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank H. 1935. The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Freeport.Google Scholar

Knight, Frank H. 1960. Intelligence and Democratic Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht I.” De Economist 81: 679–702.Google Scholar

Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht II.” De Economist 81: 766–85.Google Scholar

Koopmans, J. G. 1932. “De Mogelijkheid van een Meervoudig Economisch Evenwicht III.” De Economist 81: 841–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1937. Linear Regression Analysis of Economic Time Series. Haarlem: Bohn.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tjalling C., Tinbergen, Jan, Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas, and Orcutt, Guy H.. 1952. “Toward Partial Redirection of Econometrics: Comments.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (3): 200–213.Google Scholar

Koppl, Roger. 2002. Big Players and the Economic Theory of Expectations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kröger, Marianne. 1999. “Vervolging, Verbanning en het Nazi-Regime in het Tijdschrift ‘Het Fundament.’” Tijdschrift voor Tijdschriftstudies 3 (5): 26–35.Google Scholar

Kruuk, Hans. 2003. Niko’s Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Küçük, Y. 1967. “Sectoral Programming in the Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 96–113. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar

Küçük, Y. 196b. “The Macro-Model of the Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 78–95. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar

Kuitenbrouwer, Maarten. 1994. De Ontdekking van de Derde Wereld. Den Haag: SDU Uitgevers.Google Scholar

Laqueur, Walter, and Labedz, Leopold. 1962. Polycentrism: The New Factor in International Communism. New York: Frederick A. Praeger.Google Scholar

Lauterbach, Albert. 1976. “The ‘Convergence’ Controversy Revisited.” Kyklos 29: 733–54.Google Scholar

League of Nations. 1943. The Transition from War to Peace Economy. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar

League of Nations. 1945. Economic Stability in the Post-war World. Geneva: League of Nations.Google Scholar

Leibenstein, Harvey. 1966. “Review of Shaping the World Economy by Jan Tinbergen.” The Economic Journal 76 (301): 92–95.Google Scholar

Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1967. “Keynes and the Keynesians: A Suggested Interpretation.” The American Economic Review 57 (2): 401–10.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “‘More Merciful and Not Less Effective’: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 687–712.Google Scholar

Leonard, Thomas C. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, David M. 2002. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name: Classical Economics and the Ur-Text of Racial Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lieftinck, Pieter, Bakker, Adri, and van Lent, M. M. P.. 1989. Pieter Lieftinck, 1902–1989: Een Leven in Vogelvlucht. Utrecht: Veen.Google Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy. in the Netherlands. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linneman, Hans. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Louçã, Francisco. 1999. “The Econometric Challenge to Keynes: Arguments and Contradictions in the Early Debates about a Late Issue.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 6 (3): 404–38.Google Scholar

Louçã, Francisco. 2007. The Years of High Econometrics: A Short History of the Generation That Reinvented Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Louw, Andre Van der. 1974. Rood als je Hart: Geschiedenis van de AJC. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Lucas, Robert E. 1976. “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1): 19–46.Google Scholar

Lunteren, Frans H. van. 2006. “Wissenschaft internationalisieren: Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, Paul Ehrenfest und ihre Arbeit für die internationale Wissenschafts-Community.” In Einstein und Europa – Dimensionen moderner Forschung, edited by Claussen, A., 25–35. Düsseldorf: Wissenschaftszentrum NRW.Google Scholar

Lunteren, Frans H., and Hollestelle, Marijn J.. 2013. “Paul Ehrenfest and the Dilemmas of Modernity.” Isis 104: 504–36.Google Scholar

Luytelaer, Th., and Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “De Koffievalorisaties: Geschiedenis en Resultaten.” De Economist 81: 517–38.Google Scholar

Maarseveen, J. G. S. J., and Schreijnders, R.. 1999. Welgeteld Een Eeuw. Zeist: CBS/IISG.Google Scholar

Maas, Harro. 2005. William Stanley Jevons and the Making of Modern Economics. Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maas, Harro. 2014. Economic Methodology: A Historical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Magnus, Jan R., and Morgan, Mary S.. 1987. “The ET Interview: Professor J. Tinbergen.” Econometric Theory 3: 117–42.Google Scholar

Maier, Charles S. 1970. “Between Taylorism and Technocracy: European Ideologies and the Vision of Industrial Productivity in the 1920s.” Journal of Contemporary History 5 (2): 27–61.Google Scholar

Malinvaud, Edmond. 2007. “About the Role, in Older Days, of Econometrics in Quantitative Economics.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (3): 423–48.Google Scholar

Man, Hendrik de. 1927. Die Kampf um die Arbeitsfreude. Jena: Eugen Diederichs.Google Scholar

Man, Hendrik 1927. Zur Pscyhologie des Sozialismus. Jena: Eugen Diederichs.Google Scholar

Man, Hendrik 1932. Massen und Führer. Potsdam: Protte.Google Scholar

Man, Hendrik 1934. Voor een Plan van Actie. Amsterdam: Contact.Google Scholar

Marchi, Neil. 1991. “League of Nations Economists and the Ideal of Peaceful Change in the Decade of the Thirties.” In Economics and National Security, edited by Goodwin, Crauford D., 143–78. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Marchi, Neil. 2016. “Models and Misperceptions: Chenery, Hirschman and Tinbergen on Development Planning.” Research in the History and Methodology of Economic Thought 34B: 91–99.Google Scholar

Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World: The History of an Idea, 1815 to the Present. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Meade, James E. 1940. The Economic Basis of a Durable Peace. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Meadows, Donella H. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar

Meier, Gerald M. 1984. Pioneers of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904.Google Scholar

Meyer, Alfred G. 1970. “Theories of Convergence.” In Change in Communist Systems, edited by Johnson, Chalmers, 313–41. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mıhçıoğlu, Cemal. 1983. “Devlet Planlama Örgütünün Kuruluş Günleri.” In Prof. Dr. Fadıl H. Sur’un Anısına Armağan, 229–57. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Mıhçıoğlu, Cemal. 1988. “Yi̇ ne Devlet Planlama Örgütünün Kuruluşu Üzeri̇ ne.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 43 (1): 113–46.Google Scholar

Milor, Vedat. 1990. “The Genesis of Planning in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 4: 1–30.Google Scholar

Mintzel, Alf. 1983. Die Volkspartei: Typus und Wirklichkeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mizen, Paul, Moggridge, Don, and Presley, John. 1998. “The Papers of Dennis Robertson: The Discovery of Unexpected Riches.” History of Political Economy 29 (4): 573–82.Google Scholar

Mok, R. J. M. 1999. “In de Ban van het Ras. Aardrijkskunde tussen Wetenschap en Samenleving 1876–1992.” University of Amsterdam. http://dare.uva.nl/document/2/34891.Google Scholar

Mok, S. 1927. “Slechte Voorlichting.” Kentering 4 (2): 27–29.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. 1990. History of Econometric Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. 1991. “The Stamping out of Process Analysis in Econometrics.” In Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programs, edited by de Marchi, Neil and Blaug, Mark, 237–63. Brookfield: Aldershot.Google Scholar

Morgan, Mary S. 2012. The World in a Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. 1928. Wirtschaftsprognose: Eine Untersuchung ihrer Voraussetzungen und Möglichkeiten. Wien: Julius Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, Oskar. 1935. “Vollkommene Voraussicht und wirtschaftliches Gleichgewicht.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 6 (3): 337–57.Google Scholar

Moscati, Ivan. 2018. Measuring Utility: From the Marginal Revolution to Behavioral Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mrijen, Anne-Marie. 2015. De Rode Jonker: De Eeuw van Marinus van Goes van Naters (1900–2005). Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar

Myrdal, Gunnar. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nederhorst, G. 1936. “Vooruitzichten der Internationale Productie Ordening.” Fundament 3 (12): 30–46.Google Scholar

Nederlandse Volksbeweging. 1945. Program en Toelichting van de Nederlandse Volksbeweging. Amsterdam: Anderson.Google Scholar

Nehru, Jawaharlal. 1952. “Address.” In International Statistical Conferences: December 1951 India, 12–18. Calcutta: EKA Press.Google Scholar

Neisser, Hans. 1931. “Der Gegensatz von ‘anschaulich’ und ‘rational’ in der Geschichte der Volkswirtschaftslehre.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 65 (2): 225–50.Google Scholar

Nekkers, Jan. 1985a. “Een Ingenieur in de Politiek: Hein Vos. En het Plan van de Arbeid.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 101–23. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

Nekkers, Jan. 1985b. “Sentiment en Program.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 11–100. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

Netherlands Economic Institute, Division of Balanced International Growth. 1957. “Economic Development, Transportation and the National Income Test.” Rotterdam: Netherlands Economics Institute.Google Scholar

Neurath, Otto. 1935. Was bedeutet rationale Wirtschaftsbetrachtung. Wien: Gerold.Google Scholar

Noble, David F. 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Noordergraaf, Herman. 1994. Niet met de Wapenen der Barbaren: Het Christen-Socialisme van Bart de Ligt. Baarn: Ten Haave.Google Scholar

Noordman, Jan. 1989. Om de Kwaliteit van het Nageslacht: Eugenetica in Nederland 1900–1950. Nijmegen: Sun.Google Scholar

NOVIB. 1958. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Internationale Bijstand. Den Haag: NOVIB.Google Scholar

NOVIB. 1961. 1% Aktie: Daadwerkelijke Gerechtigheid. Den Haag: NOVIB.Google Scholar

Oomens, C. A. 1985. “De Ontwikkeling van de Nationale Rekeningen in Nederland.” In Voor Praktijk of Wetenschap, edited by Begeer, W., Oomens, C. A., and De Vries, W. F. M., 23–46. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek.Google Scholar

Orcutt, Guy H. 1952. “Toward the Partial Redirection of Econometrics.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 34 (3): 195–200.Google Scholar

Övgün, Barış. 2009. Türkiye’de Kamu İktisadi Teşebbüsü Olgusu. Ankara: Mülkiyeliler Birliği Vakıf Yayınları.Google Scholar

Passenier, Jacques. 1994. Van Planning naar Scanning: Een Halve Eeuw Planbureau in Nederland. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar

Patinkin, Don. 1976. “Keynes and Econometrics: On the Interaction between the Macroeconomic Revolutions of the Interwar Period.” Econometrica 44 (6): 1091–1123.Google Scholar

Pauly, Louis W. 1996. The League of Nations and the Foreshadowing of the International Monetary Fund. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pels, Dick. 1985. “Hendrik de Man en de Ideologie van het Planisme.” In Het Moet, het Kan! Op voor het Plan!, edited by van Galen, John Jansen, Nekkers, Jan, Pels, Dick, and Pronk, Jan P., 124–55. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

Pen, Jan. 1988. “Tussen Elitisme En Egalitarisme.” In Distantie En Engagement, edited by Alberts, Gerard and Weeder, P., 55–64. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar

Pen, Jan. 2006. Vandaag Staat Niet Alleen: Essays and Memoires. Amsterdam: Nieuwe Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Pen, Jan, and Tinbergen, Jan. 1977. Naar een Rechtvaardiger Inkomensverdeling. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Peski, Adriaan M. van. 1969. Hendrik de Man. Brugge: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar

Peski-Tinbergen, Tineke, and van Peski, Adriaan M.. 1958. “Communistische Opvoeding en Gedachtenvorming bij de Jeugd in de D.D.R.” Wending 13 (3): 149–172.Google Scholar

Pleingroep. 1958. “Verklaring.” Plein 5 (July): 2–3.Google Scholar

Polak, Fred L. 1948. “De Problematiek der Welvaartsplanning en haar Ontwikkeling in de Buitenlandse Litteratuur.” De Economist 96 (1): 161–92.Google Scholar

Polak, Jacques J. 1937. “Publieke Werken als Vorm van Conjunctuurpolitiek.” Dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Polak, Jacques J. 1939. “International Propagation of Business Cycles.” The Review of Economic Studies 6 (2): 79–99.Google Scholar

Polak, Jacques J. 1954. An International Economic System. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Polak, Jacques J. 1997. “The Contribution of the International Monetary Fund.” History of Political Economy 28 (Annual Supplement): 211–24.Google Scholar

Praag, Bernard M. S., and Ferrer-i-Carbonell, Ada. 2004. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pronk, Jan P. 2019. “Tinbergen, Idealist and Inspirer.” Tinbergen Today. 2019. www.janpronk.nl/essays/english-and-german/tinbergen-idealist-and-inspirer-by-jan-pronk-article.html.Google Scholar

Prybyla, Jan S. 1964. “The Convergence of Western and Communist Economic Systems: A Critical Estimate.” The Russian Review 23 (1): 3–17.Google Scholar

Publikaties van de Stadsbibliotheek en het Archief en Museum voor het Vlaamse Cultuurleven. 1985. Hendrik de Man: Een Portret, 1885–1953. Antwerpen: Archief en Museum voor het Vlaamse Cultuurleven.Google Scholar

Puttaswamaiah, K. 1996. Tinbergen and Modern Economics: The Noble Economist Saint. New Delhi: Indus Publishing.Google Scholar

Reinders, J. S. 1987. “Macht in Dienst van Recht. Gereformeerden over Oorlog en Vrede in de Periode 1918–1940.” In Een Land nog Niet in Kaart Gebracht, 241–58. Amsterdam: J. de Bruijn.Google Scholar

Reindersma, W., and van Lohuizen, Teunis. 1930. Nieuw Leerboek der Natuurkunde: Voor Hoogere Burgerscholen met 5-Jarigen Cursus, Lycea en Gymnasia. Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar

Robbins, Lionel R. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Rodenburg, Peter. 2010. “The Goudriaan–Tinbergen Debate on Dynamics and Equilibrium: 1931–1952.” http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1615458.Google Scholar

Roelofsen, C. G. 1995. “Jan Hendrik Willem Verzijl.” In The Moulding of International Law: Ten Dutch Proponents, edited by Tanja, Gerard J., 335–66. The Hague: Asser Instituut.Google Scholar

Roos, Charles Frederick. 1948. Charting the Course of Your Business: Measuring the Effects of External Influences. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar

Röpke, Wilhelm. 1950. The Social Crisis of Our Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rugina, Anghel N. 1988. “The Unending Search for Universal and Lasting Peace, from Leon Walras to Jan Tinbergen and Beyond.” Review of Social Economy 46 (3): 283–306.Google Scholar

Ruijter, A. de. 1946. “Inleidingen op ons Congres.” De Vakbeweging 2 (25): 2.Google Scholar

Salin, Edgar. 1923. Geschichte der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Salin, Edgar. 1950. “Walter Eucken: In Memoriam.” Kyklos 4: 1–4.Google Scholar

Samuelson, Paul A. 2004. “Homage to Jan Tinbergen.” De Economist 152 (2): 152–53.Google Scholar

Sarlemijn, Andries. 1987. “Konvergenz in Bezug auf Planung der Forschung?” In Wissenschaftsforschung Im Internationalen Vergleich, edited by Burrichter, Clemens and Lauterbach, G., 227–81. Nuernberg: Erlangen.Google Scholar

Scheall, Scott, and Schumacher, Reinhard. 2018. “Karl Menger as Son of Carl Menger.” History of Political Economy 50: 649–78.Google Scholar

Schenk, M. G., and Van Herk, Magdaleen. 1980. Juliana: Vorstin naast de Rode Loper. Amsterdam: De Boekerij.Google Scholar

Schils, René. 2012. “Hendrik Antoon Lorentz.” In How James Watt Invented the Copier: Forgotten Inventions of Our Great Scientists, 95–101. New York: Springer New York.Google Scholar

Schmoller, Gustav. 1897. “Wechselnde Theorien und feststehende Wahrheiten im Gebiete der Staats- und Socialwissenschaften und die heutige Deutsche Volkswirtschaftslehre.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 21 (4): 243–64.Google Scholar

Schöll, Guus van. 1981. Dienstweigering in Nederland voor de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Zwolle: Stichting Voorlichting Aktieve Geweldloosheid.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1926. “Gustav v. Schmoller und die Probleme von Heute.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 50 (3): 337–88.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1949. “Science and Ideology.” The American Economic Review 39 (2): 346–59.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

SDAP. 1931. “Nieuwe Organen.” Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Sent, Esther-Mirjam, and Bartelsman, Eric. 2019. Conversations between Nobel Laureates and Policymakers. Den Haag: KVS.Google Scholar

Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert A. 1976. “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality.” In 25 Years of Economic Theory, edited by Kastelein, T. J., Kuipers, Simon K., Nijenhuis, W. A., and Wagenaar, R. G., 65–86. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar

Singer, H. W. 1949. “Economic Progress in Underdeveloped Countries.” Social Research 16 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar

Slobodian, Quinn. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sluga, Glenda. 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Sluyser, M. 1934. Planmatige Socialistische Politiek. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Sociaal-Economische Raad. 1953. Advies inzake het Vraagstuk van de Huren. Den Haag: Sociaal-Economische Raad.Google Scholar

Sombart, Werner. 1930. Die Drei Nationalökonomien. Munich: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Somsen, Geert. 2001. “Waardevolle Wetenschap. Bespiegelingen over Natuurwetenschap, Moraal en Samenleving in de Aanloop naar de Doorbraakbeweging.” Gewina 24: 207–24.Google Scholar

Sönmez, A. 1967. “The Re-Emergence of the Idea of Planning and the Scope and Targets of the 1963–1967 Plan.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 28–43. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar

Staatscommissie Bevolkingsvraagstuk Muntendam. 1976. “Bevolking en Welzijn in Nederland.” ’s-Gravenhage.Google Scholar

Steenkamp, P. J. A. M. 1978. “Gespreide Verantwoordelijk. Een Christen-Democratische Bijdrage aan de Discussie over de Economische Orde.” Den Haag. https://d2vry01uvf8h31.cloudfront.net/Organisaties/WI/1978%20-%20Gespreide%20verantwoordelijkheid%20deel%201.pdf.Google Scholar

Sterk, H. 1937. “Van Jeugdbeweging naar Socialisme.” Het Fundament 4 (11): 1–12.Google Scholar

Steur, J. A. G. van der. 1914. Beschrijving, behoorende bij het Vredespaleis. Rotterdam: Nijgh & Van Ditmar.Google Scholar

Stichting van den Arbeid. 1952. Werkclassificatie als Hulpmiddel bij de Loonpolitiek. ’s-Gravenhage: Stichting van den Arbeid.Google Scholar

Stokvis, J.E. 1930. “Na Utrecht.” De Socialistische Gids 15 (3): 198–205.Google Scholar

Sur, Fadil H. 1983. Prof. Dr. Fadıl H. Sur’un Anısına Armağan. Ankara: A. Ü. S. B. F. ve Basın-Yayın Yüksek Okulu Basımevi.Google Scholar

Svorenčík, Andrej. 2015. “The Experimental Turn in Economics: A History of Experimental Economics.” PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2560026.Google Scholar

Terhal, Piet. 2015. Wegen naar een Menswaardige Toekomst. Soesterberg: Aspekt.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Dirk Cornelis. 1919. “Kinderpraat.” De Nieuwe Taalgids 13: 1–16, 65–86.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1924. “Verstand of Gevoel?” Kentering 1: 24–25.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Buitenland. Zweden.” Kentering 1: 7–8.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Faze- en Energieverandering van een Slinger en een Snaar gedurende hun Brown’se Beweging.” Physica: Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor Natuurkunde 5 (11–12): 361–63.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Opmerkingen over de Arbeidswaardeleer.” Kentering 2 (2): 25–28.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Wiskunde – Grenswaarde – Marx.” Kentering 1 (5): 65–68.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Onze Plicht.” Het Volk, 28 November.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Gruwelike Armoe.” Het Volk, 8 December.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: De ‘Zegen’ van een Groot Gezin.” Het Volk, 17 December.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1925. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Van een die Rust Nodig heeft.” Het Volk, 24 December.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van H. Ford’s Productie en Welvaart.” Kentering 2 (3): 45–47.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van R. Hilferding’s Das Finanzkapital.” Kentering 2 (7): 83–85.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Boekbespreking van L. Frank’s De Burger.” Kentering 2 (4): 92–93.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Uit een Andere Wereld.” Kentering 2 (4): 57–58.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Wat we Doen Moeten.” Kentering 2 (8): 117–19.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Het Leven van Werklozen: ‘De Luxe S.D.A.P.-er te Zijn.’” Het Volk, 7 January.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Schande!” Het Volk, 15 January.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1926. “Het Leven van Werklozen: Een ‘Gewoon’ Geval.” Het Volk, 12 February.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Gewonnen.” Het Jonge Volk 14 (26).Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Over de Mathematies-Statistiese Methoden voor Konjunktuuronderzoek.” De Economist 76: 711–23.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Wetenschappelijk Sosialisties Werk.” Kentering 4 (1): 5–9.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Tewerkstelling-Premie.” Het Volk, 15 July.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1927. “Werkloosheidsproblemen.” Het Volk, 22 August.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “A.J.C.-er en Student.” Het Jonge Volk 15: 76.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “In der Steden Donk’re Stegen is een Lichte Roep Ontwaakt …” Het Jonge Volk 15 (6): 99.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Macht en Ekonomiese Wet.” Kentering 4 (4): 57–60.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Opmerkingen over Ruiltheorie.” De Socialistische Gids 13 (5–6): 431–45, 539–48.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Opmerkingen over Ruiltheorie II.” De Socialistische Gids 13 (6): 539–48.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Werktijdverkorting een Middel tegen Werkloosheid.” Het Volk, 15 September.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1928. “Eenmanswagens.” Het Volk, 18 October.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Boekbespreking van O. Morgenstern’s Wirtschaftsprognose.” De Economist 78: 141–43.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Konjunkturforschung und Variationsrechnung.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik 61 (3): 533–41.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Minimumproblemen in de Natuurkunde en de Ekonomie.” Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1929. “Vraagstukken van Socialistiese Ekonomie.” De Socialistische Gids 14 (6): 528–40.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Bestimmung und Deutung von Angebotskurven: Ein Beispiel.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1 (5): 669–79.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “De Werkloosheid.” De Socialistische Gids 15 (12): 817–23.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Mathematiese Psychologie.” Mensch en Maatschappij 6: 342–52.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Review of R. Wedemeyer’s Konjunkturverslechterung durch Lohnerhöhungen.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 1: 481–85.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930e. “Socialisten en Hoge Inkomens.” Het Volk, 20 May.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Socialisten en Hoge Inkomens: Een Antwoord.” Het Volk, 28 July.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1930. “Vóór-Marxistisch?” Het Volk, 25 August.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “De Landbouwkrisis: Praeadvies Uitgebracht voor de Socialistiese Vereniging ter Bevordering van de Studie van Maatschappelike Vraagstukken.” De Socialistische Gids 16 (4–5): 300–13, 384–93.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “Ein Schiffbauzyklus?” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 34: 152–64.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “Oorzaken en Bestrijding der Werkloosheid.” De Socialistische Gids 16 (3): 169–80.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1931. “Review of J. Marschak’s Die Lohndiskussion.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 2: 820.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Ein Problem der Dynamik.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3 (2): 169–84.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “In Hoeverre kan het Regelen van den Omvang der Voortbrenging of van het Aanbod van Bepaalde Goederen door Producenten, al dan Niet met Medewerking van de Overheid, Bevorderlijk worden Geacht voor de Volkswelvaart?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 48–78.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Is het Einde van de Crisis in Zicht?” De Sociaal-Democraat 10 (September): 2.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Kapitaalvorming en Conjunctuur in Nederland 1880–1930.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 3 (1): 8–16.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Prijsvorming op de Aandelenmarkt.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 3 (3): 12–23.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1932. “Review of A. Ammon’s Das Lohnproblem.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3: 123–24.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “De Invloed van de Werkloosheid op het Loonpeil.” De Nederlandsche Conjunctuur 4 (2): 10–13.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. De Konjunktuur. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “L’Utilisation des Équations fonctionnelles et des Nombres complexes dans les Recherches économiques.” Econometrica 1 (1): 36–51.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. Statistiek en Wiskunde in Dienst van het Konjunktuuronderzoek. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1933. “The Notions of Horizon and Expectancy in Dynamic Economics.” Econometrica 1 (3): 247–64.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. “De Politiek van Roosevelt.” Kentering 9 (7): 99–100.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. “Der Einfluß der Kaufkraftregulierung auf den Konjunkturverlauf.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 5 (3): 289–319.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1934. Praeadvies Nationale Vereeniging tegen de Werkloosheid: Is te Verwachten dat de Maatregelen van President Roosevelt zullen Bijdragen, en zo Ja in welke Mate, tot een Blijvende Vermindering der Werkloosheid in de Verenigde Staten van Noord-Amerika.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Annual Survey: Suggestions on Quantitative Business Cycle Theory.” Econometrica 3 (3): 241–308.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “De Economische Zijde van het Ordeningsvraagstuk.” In Ordening, 17–29. Delft: Delftsch Hogeschoolfonds.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “De Politiek van Roosevelt.” De Socialistische Gids 20 (2): 87–97.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Desiderata op het Punt van de Conjunctuurstatistiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 20 (1000): 199.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “La Politique des Salaires, les Cycles économiques et les mathématiques.” Revue des Sciences économiques 9 (1): 17–29.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1935. “Ordening: Een Arbeidersbelang.” De Groene Amsterdammer, no. 3012: 4.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Conjunctuurpolitiek en Prijsstabilisatie.” De Economist 85: 443–56.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “De Conjunctuurpolitiek in Zweden.” Hollandsche Revue 41 (8): 351–53.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “De Positie van het Plan van de Arbeid.” Fundament 3 (5): 3–6.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Fascistische Economie.” Anti-Fascistische Stemmen 1 (2): 2–3.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Kan hier te Lande, al dan Niet na Overheidsingrijpen, een Verbetering van de Binnenlandse Conjunctuur Intreden, ook zonder Verbetering van onze Exportpositie?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 62–108. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Review of Otto Neurath’s Was Bedeutet Rationale Wirtschaftsbetragtung.” Erkenntnis 7: 70–71.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1936. “Sur la Détermination statistique de la Position d’équilibre cyclique.” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 4 (2): 173–88.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1937. “Review of R. F. Harrod’s The Trade Cycle.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 51: 89–91.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1939. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories: I. A Method and Its Application to Investment Activity. Geneva: League of Nations Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1939. Statistical Testing of Business-Cycle Theories: II. Business Cycles in the United States. of America 1919–1932. Geneva: League of Nations Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1940. “Enkele Cijfers en Beschouwingen over de Algemeene Aspecten der Financieele Politiek.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 25 (1262): 174–76.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1940. “On a Method of Statistical Business-Cycle Research. A Comment.” The Economic Journal 50 (197): 154–56.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1941. “Indifferente en Labiele Evenwichten in Economische Stelsels.” De Economist 90: 561–84.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1941. Technische Ontwikkeling en Werkgelegenheid. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Critical Remarks on Some Business-Cycle Theories.” Econometrica 10: 129–46.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. Is Nederland Overbevolkt? Leiden: Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Professor Douglas’ Production Function.” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 10: 37–48.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1942. “Zur Theorie der langfristigen Wirtschaftsentwicklung.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 55: 511–49.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1943. Economische Bewegingsleer. Amsterdam: N. V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1943. “Over Verschillende Soorten Evenwicht en de Conjunctuurbeweging.” De Economist 92 (1943): 129–47.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. “Colin Clark’s ‘Economics of 1960.’” Revue de l’Institut international de Statistique 12: 1–4.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. De Les van Dertig Jaar: Economische Ervaringen en Mogelijkheden. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1944. “Wagemann’s ‘Alternatiewet.’” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 29 (1443): 86–87.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1945. Enkele Problemen van Centrale Planning. ’s-Gravenhage: Nederlandsch Instituut voor Efficiency.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1945. International Economic Co-operation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. Beperkte Concurrentie. Leiden: H. E. Stenfert Kroese.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. Conjunctuurpolitiek. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “De Derde Weg.” Socialisme en Democratie 3: 369–72.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “De Plaats van den Econoom in de Maatschappij.” Wording 2: 189–91.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Herstelbetalingen.” In Bouwstof voor de Oplossing van Na-Oorlogsche Vraagstukken, 44–53. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Het Nederlandsche Welvaartplan.” De Ingenieur 58 (31): A297–A305.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Nederland in de Twintigste Eeuw.” In Hecht Verbonden in Lief en Leed, 1–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Some Measurements of Elasticities of Substitution.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 28 (3): 109–16.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1946. “Unstable Equilibria in the Balance of Payments.” In Economic Research and the Development of Economic Science and Public Policy, 133–42. New York: NBER.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Deense Problemen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 32 (1564): 352–53.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Dollarschaarste en Prijsaanpassing.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 32 (1588): 816.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Gesteld, dat men Tezijnertijd het Huidige Systeem van Geleide Economie weer Geheel of Gedeeltelijk door een Stelsel van Vrije Economie zal Willen Vervangen, welke Voorwaarden moeten dan zijn Vervuld en welke Maatregelen zullen daartoe moeten worden Genomen.” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 101–19. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Problems of Central Economic Planning in the Netherlands.” Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift 85: 96–104.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “Review of C. Clark’s Economics of 1960.” Erasmus Speculum Scientiarum 1 (1): 54.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1947. “The Significance of Keynes’ Theories from the Econometric Point of View.” In The New Economics: Keynes’ Influence on Theory and Public Policy, edited by Harris, Seymour E., 208–18. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1948. “Kern van Industrialisatie dient te Berusten bij Ondernemers.” Trouw, December 9, 1948.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. De Grenzen der Ordening. Voorburg: Comité ter Bestudering van Ordeningsvraagstukken.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. Government Budget and Central Economic Plan. Reprinted by CPB. The Hague: Centraal Planbureau.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Het Nederlandsch Economisch Instituut in 1949.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 34 (1680): 576–77.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Long-Term Foreign Trade Elasticities.” Metroeconomica 1: 174–85.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Some Remarks on the Problem of Dollar Scarcity.” Econometrica 17 (Supplement): 73–97.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1949. “Welke Mogelijkheden en Middelen Bestaan er tot het in Evenwicht Brengen van de Betalingsbalans van Nederland na Afloop van de Marshall-Hulp onder Gelijktijdig Streven naar een Overwegend Vrijer Internationaal Handels- en Betalingsverkeer?” In Prae-Adviezen voor de Vereeniging voor de Staatshuishoudkunde en de Statistiek, 1–53. ’s-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1950. De Betekenis van het Sparen voor het Herstel van de Volkswelvaart. Amersfoort: Nederlandse Spaarbankbond.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1950. “Het Evenwicht in de Dollarbalans.” Internationale Spectator 4 (17): 1–4.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Boekbespreking van C. Clark’s The Conditions of Economic Progress.” De Economist 99: 540–41.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. Business Cycles in the United Kingdom 1870–1914. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “De Centrale Gedachte van de Correlatierekening.” Statistica Neerlandica 5: 3–6.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. Econometrics. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Reformulation of Current Business Cycle Theories as Refutable Hypotheses.” In Conference on Business Cycles NBER, 131–48.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1951. “Schumpeter and Quantitative Research in Economics.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 33 (2): 109–11.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “Actuele Economische Problemen van India.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 37 (1808): 41–43.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “De Economist En Het Sociale Vraagstuk.” De Economist 100: 1011–24.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “Goudriaans Analystische Economie.” De Economist 100: 401–10.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “India’s Five Year Plan.” Berita Mapie 2 (10): 8–10.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1952. “On the Theory of Economic Integration.” Les Cahiers de Bruges 2 (4): 292–309.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1953. “De Levensomstandigheden in India.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 38 (1882): 494–95.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1953. “The Analysis of Unemployment Figures and the Alleged Correspondence between Causes and Cures.” Metroeconomica 5 (2): 43–49.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “Antwoord Prof. Tinbergen op Erepromotie.” Folia Civitatis 8 (2): 1–2.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. Centralization and Decentralization in Economic Policy. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “De Voorspelling en de Beïnvloeding van de Conjunctuur.” Socialisme en Democratie 11 (3): 169–77.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. “Het Economisch Aspect.” In Het Deltaplan, Afdamming Zee-Armen: Prae-Adviezen voor de Jaarlijkse Algemene Vergadering te Maastricht op 17 Juni 1954, 29–54. Haarlem: Nederlandsche Maatschappij voor Nijverheid en Handel.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1954. International Economic Integration. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1955. “Algunas Técnicas de Planeación del Desarrollo.” El Trimestre Económico 22: 401–20.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. “On the Theory of Income Distribution.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 77 (2): 155–75.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1956. “The Optimum Rate of Saving.” The Economic Journal 66 (264): 603–9.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “De Internationale Taak van de Sociaal-Democratie.” Socialisme en Democratie 14 (2): 84–89.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “Internationale Socialistische Politiek.” Socialisme en Democratie 14 (11): 666–71.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1957. “Welfare Economics and Income Distribution.” The American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 47 (2): 490–503.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. “Meer Economisch Begrip tussen Oost en West.” Wending 13 (8): 523–31.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1958. The Design of Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “Inflatie, Integratie en Maatschappelijke Orde: Antwoord aan Professor Witteveen.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 44 (2188): 476–77.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “International Co-ordination of Stabilizaiton and Development Policies.” Kyklos 12 (3): 283–89.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1959. “The Theory of the Optimum Regime.” In Selected Papers, edited by Klaassen, L. H., Koyck, L. M., and Witteveen, H. J., 264–304. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “Europe and the World.” In Sciences humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by Brugmans, H., Cerych, L., and Lory, M. J., 379–85. Leiden: A. W. Sythoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “Optimum Savings and Utility Maximization over Time.” Econometrica 28 (2): 481–89.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. Regional Planning: Some Principles. Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1960. “The Impact of the European Economic Community on Third Countries.” In Sciences humaines et Intégration Européene, edited by Brugmans, H., Cerych, L., and Lory, M. J., 386–98. Leiden: A. W. Sythoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Do Communist and Free Economies Show a Converging Pattern?” Soviet Studies 12 (4): 333–41.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Oost-West-Gesprekken.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 46 (2279): 323.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1961. “Sociaal-Economische Aspecten van het Deltaplan.” In Rapport Deltacommissie, Dl. 6, 61–74. Den Haag: Staatsdrukkerij.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1962. “Planning in Stages.” Statsøkonomisk Tidsskrift 76 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1962. Shaping the World Economy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1962. “Voorspellingen in Politiek, Economie en Sociologie.” Nederlandsch Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie 17 (3): 193–97.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “Economic Planning for Development.” In Ambassadors Days at the Netherlands Trade Promotion Centre, edited by van den Bergh, S. J., 8–12. The Hague: Netherlands Trade Promotion Centre.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “Introductory Remarks on the ‘Ization Problem.’” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 119 (2): 328–33.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. Lessons from the Past. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1963. “The Appraisal of Investment Projects.” Rotterdam: Netherlands Economic Institute.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. “Boekbespreking van M. Bornstein En D. R. Fusfeld’s The Soviet Economy: A Book of Readings & F. D. Holzman’s Readings on the Soviet Economy.” De Economist 112: 58–60.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. Central Planning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. “Education and Economic Growth: A Reply.” Kyklos 17 (2): 274–75.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1964. “Probleme der modernen Türkei.” Bustan 5 (4): 24–31.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “De Toekomstige Sociale Orde en onze Beweging.” Socialisme en Democratie 22 (11): 728–43.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “Ideologies and Scientific Development.” Review of International Affairs 16 (372): 6–7.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1965. “International, National, Regional and Local Industries.” In Trade, Growth, and the Balance of Payments: Essays in Honor of Gottfried Haberler, edited by Caves, Richard E., Johnson, Harry G., and Kenen, Peter B., 116–25. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1966. “On the Optimal Social Order and a World Economic Policy: A Discussion with Professor Lev Leontiev.” Oost-West 5 (10): 242–44.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1966. “Ontwikkelingshulp in Wereldperspectief.” In 10 Jaar Novib. 10 Jaar Ontwikkelingshulp, 52–55. ’s-Gravenhage: NOVIB.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1967. Development Planning. London: World University Library.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1970. Een Leefbare Aarde. Amsterdam: Agon Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1971. Meten in de Menswetenschappen. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1972. “De Convergentietheorie: Antikritiek.” In Mens en Keuze, edited by de Haan, H., Kuipers, S. K., and Postma, J. K. T., 1–12. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1972. “How Should the Future Be Studied?” In Possible Futures of European Education, edited by Jensen, Stefan, 109–33. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1973. Komt er wel een Post-Economisch Tijdperk. Amsterdam: Agon Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1973. “Some Thoughts on Mature Socialism.” In Studies in Economic Planning over Space and Time, edited by Judge, George G. and Takayama, Takashi, 9–25. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1974. Hoe kunnen wij Machtsstructuren Veranderen? Zwolle: W. E. J. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1975. Het Leerproces der Openbare Mening. Groningen: H. D. Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1975. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1976. Reshaping the International Order: A Report to the Club of Rome. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1978. “De Beste Sociale Orde.” AR Staatkunde 48 (12): 469–75.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1981. “Will Western Civilization Survive?” Coexistence 18 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1982. “Kan de Economische Wetenschap Bijdragen tot de Ontwikkeling van het Recht?” In In Orde: Liber Amicorum Pieter Verloren van Themaat, 295–300. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Alternative Optimal Social Orders.” The Pakistan Development Review 23: 1–7.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Coexistence: From the Past to the Future.” Coexistence 21: 3–6.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Development Cooperation as a Learning Process.” In Pioneers of Development, edited by Meier, Gerald M., 315–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “Ik Heb Geluk Gehad …” In Dienstweigeraars: Over Dienstweigering en Verzet tegen het Militarisme vanaf de Eeuwwisseling Tot Nu, edited by Termeer, Guus, 74–79. Amsterdam: LINK.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1984. “My Life Philosophy.” The American Economist 28 (2): 5–8.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1985. “Measurability of Utility (or Welfare).” De Economist 133: 411–14.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “Het Getal Twee is van Keynes.” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 72 (3632): 1092.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. Kunnen Wij de Aarde Beheren? Kampen: Kok Agora.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “Over Modellen.” In Lessen uit het Verleden: 125 Jaar Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde, edited by Knoester, A., 99–112. ’s-Gravenhage: Vereniging voor de Staathuishoudkunde.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1987. “The Tension Theory of Welfare.” In Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy, edited by Feiwel, George R., 410–20. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1989. “A Socialism for the USA?” Coexistence 26 (2): 213–17.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1989. “Ideologische Harmonisatie tussen Oost en West?” Economisch-Statistische Berichten 74 (3736): 1203.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1990. “Conventional and New Thinking in Defence Economics.” Defence Economics 1 (2): 121–28.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1990. World Security and Equity. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1991. Entering the Third Millennium. Rotterdam: P. J. Fijan Publications.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan. 1992. “Solving the Most Urgent Problems First.” In Eminent Economists: Their Life Philosophies, edited by Szenberg, Michael, 275–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Bos, Hendricus C.. 1962. Mathematical Models of Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Bos, Hendricus C.. 1965. “Appraisal of the Model and Results of Its Application.” In Econometric Models of Education: Some Applications, 95–99. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Derksen, J. B. D.. 1941. “Nederlandsch-Indië in Cijfers.” In Daar wèrd wat Groots Verricht …, edited by van Helsdingen, W. H. and Hoogenberk, H., 495–512. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Fischer, Dietrich. 1987. Warfare and Welfare: Integrating Security into Socio-economic Policy. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Hueting, Roefie. 1992. “GNP and Market Prices: Wrong Signals for Sustainable Economic Success That Mask Environmental Destruction.” In Population, Technology and Lifestyle: The Transition to Sustainability, edited by Goodland, Robert, Daly, Herman E., and El Serafy, Salah, 52–62. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and van der Mandele, K. P.. 1958. Redevoeringen Uitgesproken ter Gelegenheid van de Ere-Promotie van Mr. K. P. van der Mandele. Rotterdam: Nederlandse Economische Hoogeschool.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and Polak, Jacques J.. 1950. The Dynamics of Business Cycles: A Study in Economic Fluctuations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, and van der Werff, H. M. A.. 1953. “Four Alternative Policies to Restore Balance of Payments Equilibrium: A Comment and an Extension.” Econometrica 21 (2): 332–35.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, Linneman, Henk, and Pronk, Jan P.. 1966. “The Meeting of the Twain.” The Columbia Journal of World Business 2 (1): 139–49.Google Scholar

Tinbergen, Jan, den Uyl, J. M., Pronk, Jan P., and Kok, Wim. 1981. “A New World Employment Plan.” Peace & Development 2: 10–20.Google Scholar

Tompitak, Marco, and Beckers, Danny. 2015. “Solide en Gedegen Onderwijs. Wiskunde en Natuurkunde Onderwijsdiscussies in de Jaren 1920 als Monitor voor Disciplinevorming.” Studium: Tijdschrift voor Wetenschaps- en Universiteitsgeschiedenis 8 (2): 84–100.Google Scholar

Tooze, Adam J. 2001. Statistics and the German. State, 1900–1945: The Making of Modern Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Toporowski, Jan. 2013. Michał Kalecki: An Intellectual Biography. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Torun, O. N. 1967. “The Establishment and Structure of the State Planning Organization.” In Planning in Turkey, edited by Ilkin, S. and Inanç, E., 44–70. Ankara: Faculty of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar

Türkcan, Ergun. 2010. Attila Sönmez’e Armağan: Türkiye’de Planlamanın Yükselişi ve Çöküşü 1960–1980. Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.Google Scholar

Tworek, Heidi J. S. 2019. “Communicable Disease: Information, Health, and Globalization in the Interwar Period.” The American Historical Review 124 (3): 813–42.Google Scholar

Ünay, Sadik. 2006. The Political Economy of Development Planning in Turkey: Neoliberal Globalization and Institutional Reform. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar

United Nations. 1949. Maintenance of Full Employment. Publication no. 1949.II.A.2. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

United Nations. 1951. “Measures for the Economic Development of Under-developed Countries.” New York.Google Scholar