Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:28:01.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Islamic Legal Theory (Uṣūl al-Fiqh) and Related Genres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2024

Omar Anchassi
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Robert Gleave
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Islamic Law in Context
A Primary Source Reader
, pp. 15 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. Asās al-Qiyās, ed. al-Sarḥān, F. (Riyadh: Maktabat al-ʿUbaykān, 1993).Google Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. al-Ghazālī’s Moderation in Belief: al-Iqtiṣād fī al-Iʻtiqād, trans. Yaqūb, Aladdin Mahmūd (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Ghazālī, Abū Ḥāmid. al-Mustaṣfā min ʿIlm al-Uṣūl, ed. al-Ashqar, M. S., 2 vols. (Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla, 1977).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Bou Akl, Ziad. ‘From Norm Evaluation to Norm Construction: The Metaethical Origin of al-Ghazālī’s Radical Infallibilism’, Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 21 (2021), 141–58.Google Scholar
Brunschvig, Robert. ‘Valeur et fondement du raisonnement juridique par analogie d’après al-Ġazālī’, Studia Islamica 34 (1971), 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principle of Qiyās (Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1986).Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Conditions of Legal Cause in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 20 (1981), 303–42.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Definition of Qiyās in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 19 (1980), 128.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘Methods of Finding the Cause of a Legal Injunction in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 25 (1986), 1144.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. ‘Dissent and Uncertainty in the Process of Legal Norm Construction in Muslim Sunnī Law’, in Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought: Studies in Honor of Professor Hossein Modaressi, ed. Cook, Michael, Haider, Najam, Rabb, Intisar and Sayeed, Asma (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), 127–44.Google Scholar
Opwis, Felicitas. Maṣlaḥa and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Shihadeh, Ayman. ‘Theories of Ethical Values in Kalām: A New Interpretation’, in The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Schmidtke, Sabine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 384407.Google Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory (Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Mukhtaṣar Muntahā al-Suʾl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal, ed. Ḥamādū, Nadhīr, 2 vols. (Beirut: Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2006).Google Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Muntahā al-Wuṣūl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 1985).Google Scholar
Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar. Muntahā al-Wuṣūl wa-l-ʿAmal fī ʿIlmay al-Uṣūl wa-l-Jadal (n.p. [Egypt]: Maṭbaʿat al-Saʿādah, 1326 [1908]).Google Scholar
al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-ʿAḍud ʿalā Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā al-Uṣūlī li-l-Imām Abī ʿAmr Jamāl al-Dīn ʿUthmān ibn ʿUmar ibn Abī Bakr al-Maʿrūf bi-Ibn al-Ḥājib al-Mālikī, ed. Naṣīf, Fādī and Yaḥyā, Ṭāriq (Beirut: Manshūrāt Muḥammad ʿAlī Bayḍūn/Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2000).Google Scholar
al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn, Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar, al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, al-Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf, al-Fanārī, Ḥasan al-Harawī and al-Warrāqī al-Jīzāwī, Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl. Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā al-Uṣūlī li-Abī ʿUmar ʿUthmān ibn al-Ḥājib al-Mālikī ; sharaḥahu ʿAḍud al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Ījī ; wa-ʿalā al-mukhtaṣar wa-l-sharḥ Ḥāshiyat Saʿd al-Dīn al-Taftāzānī ; wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Sayyid al-Sharīf al-Jurjānī ; wa-ʿalā Ḥāshiyat al-Jurjānī Ḥāshiyat Ḥasan al-Harawī al-Fanārī ; wa-ʿalā al-Mukhtaṣar wa-sharḥihi wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Saʿd wa-l-Jurjānī Ḥāshiyat Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl al-Warrāqī al-Jīzāwī, ed. Ismāʿīl, Muḥammad Ḥasan Muḥammad Ḥasan, 3 vols. (Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2004).Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn. Sharḥ al-Sharḥ li-l-Mukhtaṣar fī l-Uṣūl. MS Berlin, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Petermann I 524, fol. 144a–b.Google Scholar
al-Taftāzānī, Saʿd al-Dīn, al-Jurjānī, al-Sayyid al-Sharīf, al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn, Ibn al-Ḥājib, ʿUthmān b. ʿUmar and al-Fanārī, Ḥasan al-Harawī. Ḥāshiyat al-Taftāzānī wa-Ḥāshiyat al-Muḥaqqiq al-Jurjānī ʿalā Sharḥ al-Qāḍī ʿAḍud al-Milla wa-l-Dīn li-Mukhtaṣar al-Muntahā maʿa Ḥāshiyat al-Harawī, ed. Ismāʿīl, Shaʿbān Muḥammad, 2 vols. (Cairo: Maktabat al-Kulliyyāt al-Azhariyya, 1973).Google Scholar
Brunschvig, Robert. ‘Valeur et fondement du raisonnement juridique par analogie d’après al-Ġazālī’, Studia Islamica 34 (1971), 5788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffel, Frank. al-Ghazālī’s Philosophical Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunnī Uṣūl al-Fiqh (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridical Principle of Qiyās (Islamabad: Islamic Research Institute, 1986).Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Conditions of Legal Cause in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 20 (1981), 303–42.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘The Definition of Qiyās in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 19 (1980), 128.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ahmad. ‘Methods of Finding the Cause of a Legal Injunction in Islamic Jurisprudence’, Islamic Studies 25 (1986), 1144.Google Scholar
Miller, Larry Benjamin. Islamic Disputation Theory: The Uses and Rules of Argument in Medieval Islam (Cham: Springer, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. ‘Concomitance to Causation: Arguing Dawarān in the Proto-Ādāb al-Baḥth’, in Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World, ed. Adamson, Peter (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2019), 205–81.Google Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. The Dialectical Forge: Juridical Disputation and the Evolution of Islamic Law (Cham: Springer, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Walter Edward. ‘Mulāzama in Action in the Early Ādāb al-Baḥth’, Oriens 44 (2016), 332–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory (Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Zarkashī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad. al-Manthūr fī l-Qawāʿid, ed. Maḥmūd, Taysīr Fāʾiq Aḥmad, 3 vols. (Kuwait: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa-l-Shuʾūn al-Islāmiyya, 1985).Google Scholar
Keegan, Matthew L.Levity Makes the Law: Islamic Legal Riddles’, Islamic Law and Society 27 (2019), 214–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kızılkaya, Necmettin. Legal Maxims in Islamic Law: Concept, History, and Applications of Axioms of Juristic Accumulation (Boston: Brill, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musa, Khadiga. ‘Legal Maxims as a Genre of Islamic Law: Origins, Development, and Significance of al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhiyya’, Islamic Law and Society 21 (2014), 325–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabb, Intisar. Doubt in Islamic Law: A History of Legal Maxims, Interpretation, and Islamic Criminal Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Saba, Elias G. Harmonizing Similarities: A History of Distinctions Literature in Islamic Law (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibn Bābawayh, Muḥammad b. ͑Alī b. al-Ḥusayn. Man Lā Yaḥḍuruhu al-Faqīh (Beirut: Dār al-Ta͑āruf li-l-Maṭbū͑āt, 1994).Google Scholar
al-Muntaẓirī, Ḥusayn. Nihāyat al-Uṣūl: Taqrīrāt al-Burūjirdī (Qum: Nashr Tafakkur, n.d.).Google Scholar
al-Qummī, al-Mīrzā Abū al-Qāsim. al-Qawānīn al-Muḥkama fī l-Uṣūl (Qum: Dār al-Iḥyāʾ, 2008) (also known as Qawānīn al-Uṣūl).Google Scholar
al-Qummī, ʿAlī b. Ibrāhīm. Tafsīr al-Qummī (Najaf: Maṭba͑at al-Najaf, 1967).Google Scholar
Damad, Seyyed Mostafa Mohaghegh. ‘The Reception of Factuality (Taṣwīb) Theories of Ijtihād in Modern Uṣulī Shīʿī Thought’, in Visions of Sharīʿa: Contemporary Discussions in Shīʿī Legal Theory, ed. Bhojani, Ali-reza et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2020), 1025.Google Scholar
Eissa, Mohamed Ahmed Abdelrahman. The Jurist and the Theologian: Speculative Theology in Shāfiʿī Legal Theory (Piscataway: Gorgias Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadel, Mohammad. ‘“No Salvation Outside Islam”: Modernists, Democratic Politics, and Islamic Theological Exclusivism’, in Between Heaven and Hell: Islam, Salvation, and the Fate of Others: The Salvation Question, ed. Khalil, Mohammad Hassan (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalil, Mohammad Hassan (ed.). Islam and the Fate of Others: The Salvation Question (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Andrew. ‘The Nature of the Akhbārī/Uṣūlī Dispute in Late Ṣafawid Iran. Part 1: ‘Abdallāh al-Samāhijī’s “Munyat al-Mumārisīn”’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55 (1992), 2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zysow, Aron. The Economy of Certainty: An Introduction to the Typology of Islamic Legal Theory (Atlanta: Lockwood Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-ʿAbbāsī, Muḥammad ʿĪd. Bidʿat al-Taʿaṣṣub al-Madhhabī wa-Āthāruhā al-Khaṭīra fi Jumūd al-Fikr wa-Inḥiṭāṭ al-Muslimīn (Amman: al-Maktaba al-Islāmiyya, 1390/1970).Google Scholar
al-Būṭī, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān. al-Lāmadhhabiyya: Akhṭar Bidʿa Tuhaddid al-Sharīʿa al-Islāmiyya (Damascus: Dār al-Fārābī, 1405/1985 [1969]), trans. as Muhammad Sa’id Ramadan al-Buti, al-la-Madhhabiyya: Why Abandoning the School of Law is the Most Dangerous Innovation Threatening the Sacred Law, 2nd ed. (Rotterdam: Sunni Publications, 2017).Google Scholar
al-Būṭī, Muḥammad Saʿīd Ramaḍān. ‘Why Does One Have to Follow a Madhhab? Debate between Muhammad Sa’id al-Buti and a Leading Salafī Teacher’, trans. Nuh Ha Mim Keller, 1995, available at www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/nuh/buti.htm.Google Scholar
Amin, Kamaruddin. ‘Nāṣiruddīn al-Albānī on Muslim’s Ṣaḥīḥ: A Critical Study of His Method’, Islamic Law and Society 11 (2004), 149–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, Andreas. ‘Islamic Scholar and Religious Leader: A Portrait of Shaykh Muhammad Said Ramadan al-Buti’, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 9 (1998), 149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdeh, Emad. ‘Qurʾān and Sunna or the “Madhhabs”? A Salafī Polemic against Islamic Legal Tradition’, Islamic Law and Society 24 (2017), 211–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamdeh, Emad. Salafism and Traditionalism: Scholarly Authority in Modern Islam (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofheinz, Albrecht. ‘Transcending the Madhhab – in Practice: The Case of the Sudanese Shaykh Muḥammad Majdhūb (1795/6–1831)’, Islamic Law and Society 10 (2003), 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauzière, Henri. ‘The Construction of Salafiyya: Reconsidering Salafism from the Perspective of Conceptual History’, International Journal of Middle East Studies 40 (2010), 268–89.Google Scholar
Lauzière, Henri. The Making of Salafism: Islamic Reform in the Twentieth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Meijer, Roel (ed.). Global Salafism: Islam’s New Religious Movement (London: Hurst & Co., 2009).Google Scholar
Qureshi, Jawad Anwar. ‘Sunni Tradition in an Age of Revival and Reform: Saʿid Ramadan al-Buti (1929–2013) and his Interlocutors’, PhD thesis, University of Chicago, 2019.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×