Abbott, Frederick M., NAFTA and the Legalization of World Politics: A Case Study, in Legalization and World Politics 13 (Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001).Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. & Snidal, Duncan, Hard and Soft Law in International Governance, in Legalization and World Politics 37 (Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001).Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. & Bowman, Gregory W., Economic Integration for the Asian Century: An Early Look at New Approaches, 4 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 187 (1994).Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie & Snidal, Duncan, The Concept of Legalization, in Legalization and World Politics 17 (Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001).Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, Regional Institutions and Asian Security Order: Norms, Power, and Prospects for Peaceful Change, in Asian Security Order: Instrumental and Normative Features 211 (Alagappa, Muthiah ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Acharya, How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism, 58 Int’l Org. 239 (2004).Google Scholar

Acharya, The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics, 59 World Pol. 629 (2007).Google Scholar

Acharya, Foundations of Collective Action in Asia: Theory and Practice of Regional Cooperation (Asian Dev. Bank Institute Working Paper Series, No. 344, 2012).Google Scholar

Constructing a Security Community in South East Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. (3rd ed. 2014).Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K., Liberal Protectionism (1985).Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Chow, Jonathan T., The Perils of Consensus: How ASEAN’s Meta-Regime Undermines Economic and Environmental Cooperation, 17 Rev. Int’l Pol. Econ. 262 (2010).Google Scholar

Albert, Stuart & Whetten, David A., Organizational Identity, in 7 Research in Organizational Behavior 265 (Cummings, Larry L. & Staw, Barry M. eds., 1985).Google Scholar

Aldrich, Howard E., Organizations and Environments (1979).Google Scholar

Alford, William P., Tasselled Loafers for Barefoot Lawyers: Transformation and Tension in the World of Chinese Legal Workers, 144 China Q. 22 (1995).Google Scholar

Alford, William P., What Law?: Why Western Scholars of Chinese History and Society Have Not Had More to Say about Its Law, 23 Mod. China 398 (1997).Google Scholar

Alford, William P., Exporting the “Pursuit of Happiness,” 113 Harv. L. Rev. 1677 (2000).Google Scholar

Allee, Todd & Peinhardt, Clint, Contingent Credibility: The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment, 63 Int. Org. 401 (2011).Google Scholar

Alon, Ilan & Kellerman, Edmund, Internal Antecedents to the 1997 Asian Economic Crisis, 7 Multinational Bus. Rev. 1 (1999).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Resolving or Exacerbating Disputes?: The WTO’s New Dispute Resolution System, 79 Int’l Aff. 783 (2003).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. & Helfer, Laurence R., Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. & Hooghe, Liesbet, Regional Dispute Settlement, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Börzel, Tanja & Risse, Thomas eds., 2016).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José, How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime, 7 Widener L. Symp. J. 1 (2001).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José, Instituted Legalization and the Asia-Pacific “Region,” 5 N.Z. J. Pub. & Int’l L. 15 (2007).Google Scholar

Alvarez, José, The Once and Future Foreign Investment Regime, in Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman 15 (Arasanjani, Mahnoush H. et al. eds., 2010).Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan Felix, State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens ( 1967 ).Google Scholar

American Society of International Law, Legalization of International Relations/Internationalization of International Law, Proceedings of the 96th Annual Meeting (2002).Google Scholar

Amsden, Alice, Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Later Industrialization (1989).Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict R. O’G., The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture, in Culture and Politics in Indonesia 1 (Holt, Claire ed., 1972).Google Scholar

Anderson, Kenneth, Squaring the Circle? Reconciling Sovereignty and Global Governance through Global Government Networks, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1255 (2005).Google Scholar

Anderson, Kym & Snape, Richard, European and American Regionalism: Effects on and Options for Asia, 8 J. Japanese & Int’l Econ. 454 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ando, Mitsuyo & Kimura, Fukunari, Fragmentation in East Asia: Further Evidence, 20 Econ. Research Inst. for ASEAN and East Asia (2009), https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2009-20.pdf.Google Scholar

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Annex – Early Voluntary Sectoral Liberalization (Vancouver, Canada, Nov. 21, 1997), www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Annual-Ministerial-Meetings/1997/1997_amm/annex.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Shiro (ed.), The Politics and Economics of Integration in Asia and the Pacific (2011).Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint (Jan. 2008) www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/5187-10.pdf.Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint 2025 (Nov. 2015) www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/8.-March-2016-ASCC-Blueprint-2025.pdf.Google Scholar

ASEAN, Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (Nov. 14, 2018), https://asean.org/asean2020/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/18.-RCEP-Summit-2_Joint-Leaders-Statement_FINAL2.pdf.Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Economic Community Scorecard (Mar. 2010), https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AEC-Scorecard.pdf.Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Economic Community 2015 – Progress and Key Achievement: A Blueprint for Growth (2015), https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/1.-AEC-2015-Progress-and-Key-Achievements_04.11.2015.pdf.Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat & UNCTAD, ASEAN Investment Report 2015 (Nov. 2015), https://perma.cc/W7YR-KJTB.Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat & UNCTAD, ASEAN Investment Report 2020-2021: Investing in Industry 4.0 (Sept. 2021), https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/AIR-2020-2021.pdf.Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank, Asian Development Outlook 2014 Update: Asia in Global Value Chains (2014) www.adb.org/publications/asian-development-outlook-2014-update-asia-global-value-chains.Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank, The ASEAN Economic Integration Report 2021: Making Digital Platform Work for Asia and the Pacific (Feb. 4, 2021).Google Scholar

Azis, Iwan J., Integration, Contagion, and Income Distribution, in Regional Science Matters (Peter Nijkamp et al. eds., 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babb, Sarah & Buira, Ariel, Mission Creep, Mission Push and Discretion in Sociological Perspective: The Case of IMF Conditionality (Mar. 9, 2004), http://web.archive.org/web/20070719172319/http://www.g24.org/012gva04.pdf.Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, The Spoke Trap: Hub-and-Spoke Bilateralism in East Asia 3, NCCR TRADE Working Paper No. 2009/28 (2009).Google Scholar

Baldwin, The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization (2016).Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard & Lopez-Gonzalez, Javier, Supply-Chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses, 38 World Econ. 1682 (2015).Google Scholar

Ballor, Grace A. & Yildirim, Aydin B., Multinational Corporations and the Politics of International Trade in Multidisciplinary Perspective, 22 Bus. & Pol. 573 (2020).Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert, Social Learning Theory (1977).Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. & Finnemore, Martha, The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations, 53 Int’l Org. 699 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basu Das, Sanchita, Mind the Gap: Explaining Implementation Shortfalls in the ASEAN Economic Community (ISEAS Econ., Working Paper No. 2017-7, 2017), www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS%20EWP%202017-07%20Sanchita.pdf.Google Scholar

Beeson, Mark, What Does China’s Rise Mean for the Developmental State Paradigm, in Asia after Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy 192 (Caroll, Toby & Jarvis, Darryl S. L. eds., 2017).Google Scholar

Beeson, Mark & Stubbs, Richard (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism (2012).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, Democracy Captured: The Mega-Regional Agreements and the Future of Global Public Law, 23 (1) Constellations 58 ( 2016 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Axel, Busse, Matthias, Nunnenkamp, Peter & Roy, Martin, Do Trade and Investment Agreements Lead to More FDI? Accounting for Key Provisions Inside the Black Box, 10 Int’l Econ. & Econ. Policy 247 (2013).Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. & Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (1966).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul, From International Law to Law and Globalization, 43 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 485 (2005).Google Scholar

Best, Jacqueline, Bringing Power Back In: The IMF’s Constructivist Strategy in Critical Perspective, in Constructing the International Economy 203 (Abdelal, Rawi E. et al. eds., 2010).Google Scholar

Boesche, Roger, The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthasastra (2002).Google Scholar

Boli, John & Thomas, George M., World Polity Formation since 1875: World Culture and International Non-Governmental Organizations (1997).Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N. & Waibel, Michael, The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime (2017).Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja & Risse, Thomas, When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change, 4 Eur. Integration Online Papers (2000), https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/1696.Google Scholar

Bowie, Nile, Singapore Slings a Trade War Antidote, Asia Times (Aug. 8, 2019).Google Scholar

Boyce, Peter, The Machinery of Southeast Asian Regional Diplomacy, in New Directions in the International Relations of Southeast Asia: Global Powers and Southeast Asia 175 (1973).Google Scholar

Boyd, Alan, ASEAN Shines Bright in Foreign Investor Surveys, Asia Times (Sept. 22, 2017).Google Scholar

Brennan, Louis & Murray, Philomena (eds.), Drivers of Integration and Regionalism in Europe and Asia (2015).Google Scholar

Brewer, Thomas L. & Young, Stephen, The Multilateral Investment System and Multinational Enterprises (1998).Google Scholar

Bromley, Dennis, Relationships between Personal and Corporate Reputation, 35 Eur. J. Marketing 316 (2001).Google Scholar

Brown, Andrew D. & Starkey, Ken, Organizational Identity and Learning: A Psychodynamic Perspective, 25 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 102 (2000).Google Scholar

Brütsch, Christian & Lehmkuhl, Dirk, Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations (2007).Google Scholar

Buckley, Walter, Sociology and Modern Systems Theory (1967).Google Scholar

Capie, David, Explaining ASEAN’s Resilience, Institutions, Path Dependency, and Asia’s Emerging Architecture, in ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia 168 (Emmers, Ralf ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Carroll, Toby & Jarvis, Darryl S. L., Disembedding Autonomy: Asia after the Developmental State, in Asia after Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy 7 (Caroll, Toby & Jarvis, Darryl S. L. eds., 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Robin, et al., Trade and Logistics: An East Asian Perspective, in East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth 90 (Krumm, Kathie et al. eds., 2004).Google Scholar

Cecil Abraham, Dato State Approval in South East Asian Bilateral Investment Treaties, in Investor-State Arbitration: Lessons for Asia 123 (Moser, Michael J. ed., 2008).Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien, The ACIA: Much More than a BIT of Protection for Foreign Investors, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms 232 (Hsieh, Pasha & Mercurio, Bryan eds., 2019).Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien & Jusoh, Sufian, The ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: The Regionalization of Laws and Policy on Foreign Investment (2016).Google Scholar

Chalmers, Damien & Slupska, Julia, The Governance of Regional Markets and Globalisation, Paper Presented at the Regional Organizations and Regional Integration Workshop held at the National University of Singapore, 7–8 August 2017 (2017).Google Scholar

Chalmers, Damien & Slupska, Julia, The Regional Remaking of Trade and Investment Law, 30 (1) Eur. J. Int’l L. 169 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase-Dunn, Christopher, Global Formation: Structures of the World Economy (1989).Google Scholar

Chen, Lurong & De Lombaerde, Philippe, ASEAN between Globalization and Regionalization, 25 Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 729 (2019).Google Scholar

Cherney, Mike, Firms Want to Adjust Supply Chains Post-Pandemic, but Changes Take Time, Wall St. J. (Dec. 27, 2020).Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon, From Community to Compliance: The Evolution of Monitoring Obligations in ASEAN (2015).Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon, Asia’s Ambivalence about International Law & Institutions: Past, Present and Futures, 27 Eur. J. Int’l L. 945 (2016).Google Scholar

Chew, Lee Kim, ASEAN Unity Showing Signs of Fraying, Strait Times (July 23, 1998).Google Scholar

Chia, Siow Yue, Presentation Delivered at the ASEAN Academy: Overview of AEC Progress and Evaluating AEC Blueprint 2025 (Aug. 16, 2019) (on file with author).Google Scholar

Chimni, B.S., Capitalism, Imperialism, and International Law in the Twenty-First Century, 14 Or. Rev. Int’l L. 17 (2012).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Free Markets and Social Regulation: A Reform Agenda of the Global Trading System (2003).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Rethinking APEC: A New Experiment for a Post-Modern Institutional Arrangement, in WTO and East Asia: New Perspectives 381 (Matsushita, Mitsuo & Ahn, Dukgeun eds., 2004).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Defragmenting World Trade, 27 Nw. J. I’nt’l L. & Bus. 39 (2006).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Beyond Rationality: A Sociological Construction of the World Trade Organization, 52 Va. J. Int’l L. 321 (2012).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, An International Organization’s Identity Crisis, 34 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 359 (2014).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, The Social Foundations of World Trade: Norms, Community and Constitution (2014).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon & Kelly, Claire R., Promises and Perils of New Global Governance: A Case of the G20, 12 Chi. J. Int’l L. 491 (2012).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon & Kurtz, Jürgen, The Limits of Isomorphism: Global Investment Law and the ASEAN Investment Regime, 17 Chi. J. Int’l L. 341 (2016).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon & Kurtz, Jürgen, International Cooperation and Organizational Identities: The Evolution of the ASEAN Investment Regime, 36 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 173 (2017).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon & Kurtz, Jürgen, Legalizing the ASEAN Way: Adapting and Reimagining the ASEAN Investment Regime, 66 Am. J. Comp. L. 233 (2018).Google Scholar

Chua, Amy, World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability (2003).Google Scholar

Clague, Christopher, et al., Institutions and Economic Performance: Property Rights and Contract Enforcement, in Institutions and Economic Development: Growth and Governance in Less-Developed and Post-Socialist Countries 67 (Clague, Christopher ed., 1997).Google Scholar

Clague, Christopher, et al., Contract-Intensive Money, 4 J. Econ. Growth 185 (1999).Google Scholar

Cockerham, Geoffrey B., Regional Integration in ASEAN: Institutional Design and the ASEAN Way, 27 E. Asia 165 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Alan, Functional Cooperation and ASEAN Institutionalism: Responding to HIV/AIDS, in ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia 43 (Emmers, Ralf ed., 2012).Google Scholar

Commission on Global Governance, Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance (1995) www.gdrc.org/u-gov/global-neighbourhood/.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert M., Nomos and Narrative, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1982).Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, et al., ASEAN’S External Agreements: Law, Practice and the Quest for Collective Action ( 2015 ).Google Scholar

Daly, Eoin, et al., Reimagining Emerging ASEAN in the Wake of COVID-19, McKinsey & Co. (Aug. 2020).Google Scholar

Dam, Kenneth W., The Law–Growth Nexus: The Rule of Law and Economic Development (2006).Google Scholar

Davidson, Paul J., The ASEAN Way and the Role of Law in ASEAN Economic Cooperation, 8 Sing. Y. B. Int’l L. 165 (2004).Google Scholar

Davidson, Paul J., The Role of Soft Law in the Governance of International Economic Relations in Asia, 24 Chinese (Taiwan) Y.B. Int’l L. & Aff. 1 (2006).Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin E., What Can the Rule of Law Variables Tell Us about Rule of Law Reforms, 26 Mich. J. Int’l L. 141 (2004).Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin E. & Trebilcock, Michael J., The Relationship between Law and Development: Optimists v. Skeptics, 56 Am. J. Comp. L. 895 (2008).Google Scholar

Davis, Kevin E., et al., Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance, 46 Law & Soc’y Rev. 71 (2012).Google Scholar

Deinla, Imelda, The Development of the Rule of Law in ASEAN: The State and Regional Integration (2017).Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., Investment Treaties: ASEAN, in Asia Rising: Growth and Resilience in an Uncertain Global Economy 184 (Hill, Hal & Gochoco-Bautista, Maria Socorro eds., 2012).Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., Investment Treaties: ASEAN, in Asia Rising: Growth and Resilience in an Uncertain Global Economy 184 (Hill, Hal & Gochoco-Bautista, Maria Socorro eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., Regulatory Freedom and Control in the New ASEAN Regional Investment Treaties, 16 J. World Inv. & Trade 1018 (2015).Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., ASEAN Investment Treaties, RCEP, and CPTPP: Regional Strengths, Norms, Institutions, and Politics, 25 Wash. Int’l L. J. 349 (2018).Google Scholar

Devonshire-Ellis, Chris, How US Businesses Can Access the East Asian US$25 Trillion RCEP Free Trade Market Agreement via Existing Agreements, ASEAN Briefing (July 30, 2021) www.aseanbriefing.com/news/how-us-businesses-can-access-the-east-asian-us25-trillion-rcep-free-trade-market-agreement-via-existing-agreements/.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J. & Powell, Walter W., The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, 48 Am. Soc. Rev. 147 (1983).Google Scholar

Djankov, Simeon, et al., Courts: The Lex Mundi Project, Nat’l Bureau of Econ. Research Working Paper No. 8890 (2002) www.nber.org/papers/w8890.Google Scholar

Domke, Martin, Indonesian Nationalization Measures before Foreign Courts, 54 Am. J. Int’l L. 305 (1960).Google Scholar

Dosch, Jorn, ASEAN’s Reluctant Liberal Turn and the Thorny Road to Democracy Promotion, 21 The Pac. Rev. 527 (2008).Google Scholar

Douglas, Zachary, The International Law of Investment Claims (2009).Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W., Heretical Laments: China and the Fallacies of “Rule of Law,” 11 Cultural Dynamics 287 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einhorn, Jessica, The World Bank’s Mission Creep, 80 Foreign Aff. 22 (2001).Google Scholar

Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew & Simmons, Beth, Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000, 60 International Organization 811 (2006).Google Scholar

Elliott, Robert J. R. & Ikemoto, Kengo, AFTA and the Asian Crisis: Help or Hindrance to ASEAN Intra-Regional Trade?, 18 Asian Econ. J. 1 (2004).Google Scholar

Elm, Deborah, Using RCEP: Creating Products for Asia, Asia Trade Ctr.: Talking Trade (Dec. 4, 2019), http://asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade/using-rcep-creating-products-for-asia.Google Scholar

Emmers, Ralph, Southeast Asia’s New Security Institutions, in Asia’s New Institutional Architecture: Evolving Structures for Managing Trade, Financial, and Security Relations 201 (Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Gyo Koo, Min eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik H., Childhood and Society, 156–65 (1950).Google Scholar

Erikson, Erik H., Identity, Youth and Crisis (1968).Google Scholar

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions; Towards a Comprehensive European International Investment Policy, COM (2010) 343 final (July 7, 2010).Google Scholar

Ewing-Chow, Michael, ASEAN Integration, the Rule of Law, and Investment Agreements, 107 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 284 (2013).Google Scholar

Ewing-Chow, Michael & James Losari, Junianto, The RCEP Investment Chapter: A State-to-State WTO Style System For Now, Kluwer Arbitration Blog (Dec. 8, 2020), http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/12/08/the-rcep-investment-chapter-a-state-to-state-wto-style-system-for-now/.Google Scholar

Ewing-Chow, Michael & Tan, Hsien-Li, The Role of the Rule of Law in ASEAN Integration, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2013/16 (2013).Google Scholar

Evans, Paul M., Regional Institutions, Regional Identities, in Eastern Asia: An Introductory History 451 (Mackerras, Colin ed., 3rd ed. 2000).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, Relative Normativity in International Law, 4 Eur. J. Int’l L. 305 (1993).Google Scholar

Feinerman, James V., The Rule of Law Imposed from Outside: China’s Foreign-Oriented Legal Regime since 1978, in The Limits of the Rule of Law in China 305 (Turner, Karen G. et al. eds., 2015).Google Scholar

Finger, Matthias & Ruchat, Bérangère, The Transformation of International Public Organizations: The Case of UNCTAD (Institut de Hautes Etudes en Administration Publique, Working Paper No. 14/2000, 2000).Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society 128 (1996).Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism, 50 Int’l Org. 325 (1996).Google Scholar

Fischer, Thomas C., A Commentary on Regional Institutions in the Pacific Rim: Do APEC and ASEAN Still Matter?, 13 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 337 (2003).Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody, The Private Role in Public Governance, 75 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 543 (2000).Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M., The Republic of Choice: Law, Authority and Culture (1990).Google Scholar

Garcia, Frank, NAFTA and the Creation of the FTAA: A Critique of Piecemeal Accession, 35 Va. J.’nt’l. L. 539 (1995).Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuro, The Neoliberal Turn in Regional Trade Agreements, 86 Wash. L. Rev. 421 (2011).Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (1983).Google Scholar

Gewirtz, Paul, The U.S.—China Rule of Law Initiative, 11 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 603 (2003).Google Scholar

Gibson, James L., A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate, 42 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 819 (1998).Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (2001).Google Scholar

Ginsberg, Tom, The State of Sovereignty in Southeast Asia, 99 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 419 (2005).Google Scholar

Ginsberg, Tom, Eastphalia and Asian Regionalism, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 859 (2011).Google Scholar

Gioia, Dennis A. et al., Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability, 25 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 63 (2000).Google Scholar

Goh, Gillian, The “ASEAN” Way: Non-Intervention and ASEAN’s Role in Conflict Management, 3 Stan. J. East Asian Aff. 113 (2003).Google Scholar

Gold, Joseph, Strengthening the Soft International Law of Exchange Arrangements, 77 Am. J.’nt’l L. 443 (1983).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack L. & Posner, Eric A., The Limits of International Law (2005).Google Scholar

Goldstein, Judith & Keohane, Robert O., Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework, in Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change 3 (Goldstein, Judith & Keohane, Robert O. eds., 1993).Google Scholar

Gómez-Palacio, Ignacio & Muchlinski, Peter, Admission and Establishment, in The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law 243 (Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico & Schreuer, Christoph eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Gorb, Peter, The Psychology of Corporate Identity, 10 Eur. Mgmt. J. 310 (1992).Google Scholar

Gouldner, Alvin W., Organizational Analysis, in Sociology Today 404 (Merton, Robert K. et al. eds., 1959).Google Scholar

Grandori, Anna, Notes on the Use of Power and Efficiency Constructs in the Economics and Sociology of Organizations, in Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies 61 (Lindenberg, Siegwart M. & Schreuder, Hein eds., 1993).Google Scholar

Gray, Alistair, US Retailers Accelerate Shift away from Chinese Suppliers, Fin. Times (Sept. 10, 2019).Google Scholar

Gray, Julia, How International Organizations Survive (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author).Google Scholar

Green, Carl J., APEC and Trans-Pacific Dispute Management, 26 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 719 (1995).Google Scholar

Guha Roy, S.N., Is the Law of Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens a Part of Universal International Law? 55 Am. J. Int’l L. 866 (1961).Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T., How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (2008).Google Scholar

Haacke, Jürgen, ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects (2003).Google Scholar

Haacke, Jürgen, “Enhanced Interaction” with Myanmar and the Project of a Security Community: Is ASEAN Refining or Breaking with Its Diplomatic and Security Culture?, 27 Contemp. Se. Asia 188 (2005).Google Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. & Osinsky, Pavel, Globalization of Law, 32 Ann. Rev. Soc. 447 (2006).Google Scholar

Harding, Harry, International Order and Organization in the Asia-Pacific Region, in East Asia in Transition: Toward a New Regional Order 325 (Ross, Robert S. ed., 1995).Google Scholar

Harding, Robin & Reed, John, Asia-Pacific Countries Sign One of the Largest Free Trade Deals in History, Fin. Times (Nov. 15, 2020).Google Scholar

Harding, Robin, et al., Asian Trade Deal Set to Be Signed after Years of Negotiations, Fin. Times (Nov. 11, 2020).Google Scholar

Haswidi, Andi, ASEAN Governments Out of Step on Free Trade, Fin. Times (Feb. 12, 2019).Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the ILO, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 662 (2006).Google Scholar

Higgott, Richard, Ideas, Policy Networks and Policy Coordination in the Asia Pacific, 7 Pac. Rev. 397 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Higgott, Richard, De facto or De Jure Regionalism: The Double Discourse of Regionalisation in the Asia Pacific, 11 Global Soc’y 166 (1997).Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard & Sabel, Charles, Open Plurilateral Agreements, International Regulatory Cooperation and the WTO, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2019/10 (2019).Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., Against Populist Isolationism: New Asian Regionalism and Global South Powers in International Economic Law, 51 Cornell Int’l L.J. 683 (2018).Google Scholar

Hsieh, New Asian Regionalism in International Economic Law (2021).Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L. & Mercurio, Bryan, An Introductory Roadmap to the ASEAN Economic Community, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (2019).Google Scholar

Hutt, David, EU–China Deal May Give Biden’s Team More Options, Asia Times (Dec. 31, 2020).Google Scholar

IMF, “Recent Experiences in Managing Capital Inflows: Cross-Cutting Themes and Possible Policy Framework,” SM/11/30 (2011).Google Scholar

Inama, Stefano & Sim, Edmund W., The Foundation of the ASEAN Economic Community: An Institutional and Legal Profile (2015).Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (1997).Google Scholar

Intan, Rocky, What RCEP Can Tell Us about Geopolitics in Asia, Lowly Inst. (Dec. 1, 2020).Google Scholar

International Law Commission, Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (2011), http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdf.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas, Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade (1996).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., International Economic Law in Times That Are Interesting, 3 J. Int’l Econ. L. 8 (2000).Google Scholar

Jackson, John H.Sovereignty, the WTO and Changing Fundamentals of International Law (2006).Google Scholar

James, Harold, Deglobalization: The Rise of Disembedded Unilateralism, 10 Ann. Rev. Fin. Econ. 219 (2018).Google Scholar

Jayasuriya, Kanishka The Crisis of Open Regionalism and the New Political Economy of the Asia-Pacific, 20 Pol’y & Soc. 89 (2001).Google Scholar

Jennings, Wesley & Henderson, Brandy B., Social Learning Theory, in The Encyclopedia of Theoretical Criminology 1 (Mitchell Miller, J. ed., 2014).Google Scholar

Jetschke, Anja & Rüland, Jürgen, Decoupling Rhetoric and Practice: The Cultural Limits of ASEAN Cooperation, 22 Pac. Rev. 189 (2009).Google Scholar

Johnson, Lisa, et al., Investor-State Dispute Prevention: A Critical Reflection, 75 (4) Disp. Resol. J. 107 ( 2021 ).Google Scholar

Johnson, Steve, Trump’s Trade War: Which of China’s Neighbours Are Set to Profit?, Fin. Times (Dec. 3, 2018).Google Scholar

Johnston, Alastair Iain, Socialization in International Institutions: The ASEAN Way and International Relations Theory, in International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific (Ikenberry, John G. & Mastanduno, Michael eds., 2005).Google Scholar

Jones, David M. & Smith, Michael L. R., Making Process, Not Progress: ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order, 32 International Security 165 (2007).Google Scholar

Jones, Lee, ASEAN and the Norm of Non-Interference in Southeast Asia: A Quest for Social Order, Nuffield College Politics Group Working Paper (Mar. 2009).Google Scholar

Jones, Lee, Explaining the Failure of the ASEAN Economic Community: The Primacy of Domestic Political Economy, 29 Pac. Rev. 1 (2015).Google Scholar

Jusoh, Sufian, Investment Liberalization in ASEAN: Moving from Myths to Reality, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms 209 (Hsieh, Pasha & Mercurio, Bryan eds., 2019).Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles, Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case, in Legalization and World Politics 169 (Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001).Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles, Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization, in Legalization and World Politics 299 (Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001).Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles & MacIntyre, Andrew (eds.), Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context (2014).Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul W., Speaking Law to Power: Popular Sovereignty, Human Rights, and the New International Order, 1 Chi. J. Int’l L. 1 (2000).Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul W., Freedom, Autonomy, and the Cultural Study of Law, 13 Yale J.L. & Human. 141 (2001).Google Scholar

Kaplan, Ethan & Rodrik, Dani, Did the Malaysian Capital Controls Work?, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2754 (2001).Google Scholar

Karr, Spenser, A Battle for Choice: Selecting Investor-State Arbitrators under the RCEP, 90 Temp. L. Rev. 127 (2017).Google Scholar

Karton, Joshua, Lessons from International Uniform Law, in Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century (2015).Google Scholar

Katsumata, Hiro, Why Is ASEAN Diplomacy Changing? From “Noninterference” to “Open and Frank Discussions,” 44 Asian Surv. 237 (2004).Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Daniel, et al., Governance Matters, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2196 (1999).Google Scholar

Kawai, Masahiro & Naknoi, Kanda, ASEAN Economic Integration through Trade and Foreign Direct Investment: Long-Term Challenges, Asian Dev. Bank Institute Working Paper, No. 545 (2015).Google Scholar

Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan, Main Findings and Policy Implications, in Asia’s Free Trade Agreements: How Is Business Responding? 35 (Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan eds., 2011).Google Scholar

Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan, Conclusion, in Asia’s Free Trade Agreements: How Is Business Responding? 261 (Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan eds., 2011).Google Scholar

Kelly, Claire R., The Value Vacuum: Self-Enforcing Regimes and the Dilution of the Normative Feedback Loop, 22 Mich. J. Int’l L. 673 (2001).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1984).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., Reciprocity in International Relations, 40 Int’l Org. 1 (1986).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions: Two Approaches, 32 Int’l Stud. Q. 379 (1988).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations, 27 World Pol. 39 (1974).Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. & Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence (1977).Google Scholar

Khoman, Thanat, ASEAN: Conception and Evolution, in The ASEAN Reader, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies xix (Siddique, S., Jeshurun, C., Tan, J. L. H. & Thambipillai, P. eds., 1992).Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, The Concept of Compliance as a Function of Competing Conceptions of International Law, 19 Mich. J. Int’l L. 345 (1998).Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid (1995).Google Scholar

Knoblock, John, Xun Zi – A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vol. II (1990).Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju, Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, 106 Yale L.J. 2599 (1997).Google Scholar

Koh, Tommy, et al., 50 Years of ASEAN and Singapore (2017).Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables, in International Regimes 1 (Krasner, Stephen D. ed., 1983).Google Scholar

Krever, Tor, Quantifying Law: Legal Indicator Projects and the Reproduction of Neoliberal Common Sense, 34 Third World Q. 131 (2013).Google Scholar

Krugman, Paul, The Hub Effect: or Threeness in Interregional Trade, in Theory, Policy and Dynamics in International Trade (Ethier, Wilfred J., Helpman, Elhanan & Peter Neary, J. eds., 1993).Google Scholar

Kurtz, Jürgen & Gong, Baihua, The EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: A Model for Investment Coverage in the WTO?, in Rebooting Multilateral Trade Cooperation: Perspectives from China and Europe 191 (Hoekman, Bernard M., Xinquan, Tu & Dong, Wang eds., 2021).Google Scholar

Lee, Levither, The ASEAN Charter: ASEAN Failure or Member Failure, 43 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. Pol. 159 (2010).Google Scholar

Legro, Jeffery W., The Transformation of Policy Ideas, 44 Am. J. Pol. Sci. 419, 425 (2000).Google Scholar

Leifer, Michael, ASEAN and the Security of South-East Asia (1989).Google Scholar

Leifer, , The ASEAN Peace Process: A Category Mistake, 12 The Pac. Rev. 25 (1999).Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, A Model, a Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis, in Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure 19 (Lichbach, Mark I. & Zuckerman, Alan S. eds. 1997).Google Scholar

Li, John Shuhe, Relation-Based versus Rule-based Governance: An Explanation of the East Asian Miracle and Asian Crisis, 11 Rev. of’nt’l Econ. 651 (2003).Google Scholar

Li, Su & Ryden, Edmund, Scholar-Officials, in The Constitution of Ancient China 98 (Zhang, Yongle & Bell, Daniel A. eds. 2018).Google Scholar

Lindblom, Charles E., Politics and Markets: The World’s Political–Economic Systems (1977).Google Scholar

Lindgren, Carl-Johan, Balino, Tomas, Enock, Charles, Gulde, Anne-Marie, Quintyn, Marc & Teo, Leslie, Financial Sector Crisis and Restructuring: Lessons from Asia (1999).Google Scholar

Lipson, Charles, Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?, 45 Int’l Org. 495 (1991).Google Scholar

Ly, Luu Huong, Regional Harmonization of Competition Law and Policy: An ASEAN Approach, 2 Asian J. Int’l L. 291 (2012)Google Scholar

Lynch, Daniel C., International “Decentering” and Democratization: The Case of Thailand, 48 Int’l Stud. Q. 339 (2004).Google Scholar

Mackie, J.A.C., Konfrontasi: The Indonesia–Malaysia Dispute 1963–66 (1974).Google Scholar

Maduro, Miguel, We the Court: The European Court of Justice and the European Economic Constitution (1998).Google Scholar

Makin, Tony, Advancing Foreign Investment in APEC, Hinrich Foundation (Aug. 24, 2021) www.hinrichfoundation.com/research/article/fdi/advancing-foreign-investment-in-apec/.Google Scholar

Marchegiano, Giuseppe, The Juristic Character of the International Commission of Cape Spartel Lighthouse, 25 Am. J. Int’l L. 339 (1931).Google Scholar

Maulia, Erwida & Damayanti, Ismi, Pandemic Stalls Indonesia’s Push to Escape Middle-Income Trap, Fin. Times (Dec. 22, 2020).Google Scholar

McIntyre, Andrew, Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia, 55 Int’l Org. 81 (2001).Google Scholar

Menon, Jayant, Assessing ASEAN’s Economic Performance, Asian Dev. Bank (2018), www.adb.org/news/op-ed/assessing-asean-s-economic-performance-jayant-menon.Google Scholar

Menon, Jayant & Severino, Rodolfo, The ASEAN Community: An Overview, in The ASEAN Economic Community: A Work in Progress (Basu Das, Sanchita, Menon, Jayant, Severino, Rodolfo & Shrestha, Omkar Lal eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Menski, Werner, Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa (2nd ed. 2006).Google Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan, Trade Liberalization in Asia: Why Intra-Asian Free Agreements Are Not Utilised by the Business Community, 6 (1) Asian J. WTO & Int’l. Health L. & Pol. 109 ( 2011 ).Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engel, Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance, 52 Current Anthropology S83 (2011).Google Scholar

Meyer, John W., et al., World Society and the Nation-State, 103 Am. J. Soc. 144 (1997).Google Scholar

Michaels, Ralf, The Functional Method of Comparative Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 339 (Reimann, Mathias & Zimmermann, Reinhard eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Minor, Michael S., The Demise of Expropriation as an Instrument of LDC Policy 1980–1992, 25 J. Int’l Bus. Stud. 177 (1994).Google Scholar

Mintzberg, Henry, Power and Organizational Life Cycles, 9 Acad. Mgmt. Rev. 207 (1984).Google Scholar

Miroudot, Sébastien & Nordström, Håkan, Made in the World?: Global Value Chains in the Midst of Rising Protectionism, 57 Rev. Ind. Org. 195 (2020).Google Scholar

Mitzen, Jennifer, Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma, 12 Eur. J. Int’l Rel. 341 (2006).Google Scholar

Mohamad, Juita, ASEAN Waits for RCEP Ratification – and Post-Pandemic Integration, Hinrich Foundation (Sept. 7, 2021) www.hinrichfoundation.com/research/article/ftas/asean-waits-for-rcep-ratification-and-post-pandemic-integration/.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics, 51 Int’l Org. 513 (1997).Google Scholar

Ness, Gayl D. & Brechin, Steven R., Bridging the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations, 42 Int’l Org. 245 (1988).Google Scholar

Newcombe, Andrew & Paradell, Lluis, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties – Standards of Treatment ( 2009 ).Google Scholar

Nguitragool, Paruedee & Rüland, Jürgen, ASEAN as an Actor in International Fora: Reality, Potential and Constraints (2015).Google Scholar

Nicholls, Alicia, RCEP Investment Rules: Help or Hindrances to A’ia’s COVID-19 Recovery?, AfronomicsLAW (Feb. 17, 2021), www.afronomicslaw.org/category/analysis/rcep-investment-rules-help-or-hindrances-asias-covid-19-recovery.Google Scholar

North, Douglas C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990).Google Scholar

Nottage, Luke & Thanitcul, Sakda, An Introduction, Special Issue: International Investment Arbitration in Southeast Asia, 18 J. World Investment & Trade 767 (2017).Google Scholar

OECD, Making Global Value Chains Work for ASEAN (June 13, 2016), www.oecd.org/trade/events/making-global-value-chains-work-for-asean-13-june-2016.htm.Google Scholar

Ohnesorge, John K.M., The Rule of Law, Economic Development, and Developmental States of Northeast Asia, in Law and Development in East and Southeast Asia 70 (Antons, Christoph ed., 2003).Google Scholar

Palmer, Norman D., The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific (1991).Google Scholar

Pangestu, Mari & Gooptu, Sudarshan, New Regionalism: Options for East Asia, in East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth 48 (Krumm, Kathie & Kharas, Homi eds., 2004).Google Scholar

Pangestu, Mari, et al., A New Look at Intra-ASEAN Economic Cooperation, 8 ASEAN Econ. Bull. (1992).Google Scholar

Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration Without Privity, 10 ICSID Rev. 232 (1995).Google Scholar

Pelkmans, Jacques, The ASEAN Economic Community: A Conceptual Approach (2016).Google Scholar

Peng, Shin-yi, The WTO Legalistic Approach and East Asia: From the Legal Culture Perspective, 1 Asian-Pac. L. & Pol’y J. 13 (2000).Google Scholar

Petri, Peter A. & Plummer, Michael G., RCEP: A New Trade Agreement That Will Shape Global Economics and Politics, Brookings (Nov. 16, 2020).Google Scholar

Petri, Peter A. & Plummer, Michael G., Trade War, RECP and CPTPP: Will East Asia Decouple from the United States? (Nov. 28, 2020), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3630294.Google Scholar

Piei, Mohd Haflah, An East Asia FTA: A Malaysian Perspective, in East Asian Regionalism: Feasibilities and Challenges 109 (Yong Ahn, Choong, Baldwin, Richard E. & Cheong, Inkyo eds., 2005).Google Scholar

Pilling, David, The Fiction of a Unified, Harmonized ASEAN, Fin. Times (Dec. 10, 2015).Google Scholar

Piris, Jean-Calude & Woon, Walter, Towards a Rule-Based Community: An ASEAN Legal Service (2015).Google Scholar

Pistor, Katharina & Wellons, Philip A., The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian Economic Development 1960–1995 (Executive Summary) – Prepared for the Asian Development Bank (1998), www.asianlii.org/asia/other/ADBLPRes/1998/3.pdf.Google Scholar

Poulsen, Lauge, Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries (2017).Google Scholar

Powell, Walter W. & DiMaggio, Paul J., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991).Google Scholar

Prado, Mariana Mota & Trebilcock, Michael J., Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform, Univ. Toronto L. J. (2009).Google Scholar

Pratt, Travis C., et al., The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta-Analysis, 27 Justice Q. 765 (2010).Google Scholar

Quah, Jon S.T., Why Singapore Works: Five Secrets of Singap’re’s Success, 21(1) Publ. Admin & Pol. 5 ( 2018 ).Google Scholar

Quah, Jon S.T. & David, Seth Jones, Organising the Public Bureaucracy to Ensure Effective Implementation and Compliance with ASEAN Commitments (July 23, 2019) (unpublished manuscript) (on file with author).Google Scholar

Radaelli, Claudio M., Whither Europeanization? Concept Stretching and Substantive Change, 4 Eur. Integration Online Papers (2000).Google Scholar

Radin, Margaret Jane, Reconsidering the Rule of Law, 69 B.U.L. Rev. 781 (1989).Google Scholar

Ramcharan, Robin, ASEAN and Non-interference: A Principle Maintained, 22 Contemp. Se. Asia 60 (2000).Google Scholar

Randeria, Shalini, The State of Globalization: Legal Plurality, Overlapping Sovereignties and Ambiguous Alliances between Civil Society and the Cunning State in India, 24 Theory, Culture & Soc’y 1–34 (2007).Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal, The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law, 43 Va. J. Int’l L. 1 (2002).Google Scholar

Reed, John, Vietnam Prepares for Supply Chain Shift from China, Fin. Times (Dec. 28, 2020).Google Scholar

Reed, Mark S., et al., What Is Social Learning?, Eco. & Soc’y,. vol. 15, no. 4 (2010), www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/.Google Scholar

Ren, Xin, Tradition of the Law and Law of the Tradition: Law, State, and Social Control in China (1997).Google Scholar

Ress, Georg, The Interpretation of the Charter, in The Charter of the United Nations – A Commentary 28 (Simma, Bruno et al. eds., 1994).Google Scholar

Roberts, Anthea, Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States, 104 Am. J. Int’l L. 179, 186 (2010).Google Scholar

Rudner, Martin, Institutional Approaches to Regional Trade and Cooperation in the Asia Pacific Area, 4 Transnat’l L. & Contemp. Probs. 159 (1994).Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations, 47 Int’l Org. 139 (1993).Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, Embedded Liberalism and Postwar Economic Regimes, in Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (Ruggie, John ed., 1998).Google Scholar

Rüland, Jürgen, The Indonesian Way: ASEAN, Europeanization and Foreign Policy Debates in a New Democracy (2018).Google Scholar

Rüland, Jürgen, Coping with Crisis: Southeast Asian Regionalism and the Ideational Constraints of Reform, 16 Asia Eur. J. 155 (2018).Google Scholar

Sachs, Lisa & Sauvant, Karl, BITs, DTTs and FDI Flows: An Overview, in The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties and Investment Flows (Sauvant, Karl P. & Sachs, Lisa E. eds., 2009 ).Google Scholar

Scalapino, Robert A., Regionalism in the Pacific: Prospects and Problems for the Pacific Basin, 26 Atl. Cmty. Q. 174 (1988).Google Scholar

Scheuerman, William, Economic Globalization and the Rule of Law, 6 Constellations 1 (1999).Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank, The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union, 55 Int’l Org. 47 (2001).Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David, International Investment Law as Formally Rational Law: A Weberian Analysis, in Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law (Hirsch, Moshe & Lang, Andrew eds., 2020).Google Scholar

Scoles, Samuel, 15 Asia-Pacific Countries Sign World’s Largest FTA; A Closer Look at RCEP’s Key Outcomes and Implications, White & Case (Nov. 25, 2020).Google Scholar

Scott, Richard W., Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (3rd ed. 1991).Google Scholar

Sellier, Elodie, The ASEAN Economic Community: The Force Awakens?, The Diplomat (Jan. 12, 2016).Google Scholar

Setboonsarng, Suthad, ASEAN Economic Cooperation: Adjusting to the Crisis, Southeast Asian Aff. 35 (1998).Google Scholar

Severino, Rodolfo C., Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary-General (2006).Google Scholar

Sewell, William H. Jr., Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology, in The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences 245 (McDonald, Terrance J. ed., 1996).Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory C. & Pollack, Mark A., Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 706 (2010).Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problem of Soft Law, in Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System 1 (Shelton, Dinah ed., 2000).Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., Rational Choice Institutionalism, in Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions (Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, Sarah A. & Rockman, Bert A. eds., 2008).Google Scholar

Shihata, Ibrahim F.I., The Dynamic Evolution of International Organizations: The Case of the World Bank, 2 J. His. Int’l L. 217 (2000).Google Scholar

Shockey, John E., Bank Regulatory Examination and Enforcement after Barings and Daiwa, in Financial Services Litigation, 935 Corp. L. & Prac. Course Handbook 681, 708 (Practicing Law Institute 1996).Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth, Asia, East, investment and International Law: Distinctive or Convergent?, 13(3) Kor. J. Int’l. Stud. 461 (2015).Google Scholar

Simmons, Beth A. & Steinberg, Richard H., International Law and International Relations ( 2007 ).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A Liberal Theory of International Law, 94 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc. 240 (2000).Google Scholar

Snape, Richard, Which Regional Trade Agreement?, in Regional Integration and the Asia Pacific (Nora, Bijit & Findlay, Christopher eds. 1996).Google Scholar

Solingen, E., The Genesis, Design and Effects of Regional Institutions: Lessons from East Asia and the Middle East, 52 Int’l Stud. Q. 261 (2008).Google Scholar

Sornarajah, Muthucumaraswamy, Mutations of Neo-Liberalism in International Investment Law, 3 Trade L. & Dev. 203 (2011).Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation (2002).Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H. & Zasloff, Jonathan M., Power and International Law, 100 Am. J. Int’l L. 64 (2006).Google Scholar

Stubbs, Richard, Signing on to Liberalization: AFTA and the Politics of Regional Economic Cooperation, 13 Pacific Rev. 297 (2000).Google Scholar

Tai, Benny Y.T., Developing an Index of the Rule of Law: Sharing the Experience of Hong Kong, 2 Asian J. Comp. L. 1 (2007).Google Scholar

Tan, Lay Hong, Law and Policy in ASEAN Economic Integration, 38 Asia Bus. L. Rev. 3 (2002).Google Scholar

Tangkitvanich, Somkiat & Rattanakhamfu, Saowaruj, The ASEAN Economic Community and the East Asian Agenda, in Asian Economic Integration in an Era of Global Uncertainty 190 (Armstrong, Shiro & Westland, Tom eds., 2018).Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti & Howse, Robert, Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order, 41 N. Y. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 959 (2009).Google Scholar

Tetsuo, Abo, Spontaneous Integration in Japan and East Asia: Development, Crisis, and Beyond, in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography (Clark, Gordon L. et al. eds., 2000).Google Scholar

Thompson, Edmund R., ASEAN after the Financial Crisis, 17 ASEAN Econ. Bull. (2000).Google Scholar

Tourk, Khairy, Asia-Pacific Pact Is a Triumph for the Region’s “Quiet Diplomacy,” Fin. Times (Nov. 19, 2020).Google Scholar

Trachtman, Joel P., The Constitutions of the WTO, 17 Eur. J. Int’l L. 623 (2006).Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J. & Howse, Robert, The Regulation of International Trade (3rd ed. 2005).Google Scholar

Trubek, David M., Max Weber on Law and the Rise of Capitalism, 1972 Wis. L. Rev. 720 (1972).Google Scholar

Trubek, David M., Toward a Social Theory of Law: An Essay on the Study of Law and Development, 82 Yale L.J. 1 (1972).Google Scholar

Tzouvala, Ntina, A False Promise?: Regulating Land-Grabbing and the Post-Colonial State, 32 Leiden J. Int’l L. 235 (2019).Google Scholar

U.N. Conference on Trade and Development, Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment (1996).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/DTCI/28 (1996).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, International Investment Instruments: A Compendium Vol. I, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/DTCI/30(Vol. I) (May 31, 1996).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, International Investment Instruments: A Compendium, Vol. III, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/DTCI/30(Vol. III) (May 31, 1996).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties 1959–1999, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2 (2000).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, International Investment Law Rule-Making: Stocktaking, Challenges and The Way Forward, U.N. Doc. UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2007/3 (2008 ).Google Scholar

UNCTAD, FDI Statistics Division on Investment and Enterprise (April 2, 2016), http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/FDI%20Statistics/FDI-Statistics.aspx.Google Scholar

United States Department of State, Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (2004), https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/U.S.%20model%20BIT.pdf.Google Scholar

United States International Trade Commission, Pub. No. 4176, ASEAN: Regional Trends in Economic Integration, Export Competitiveness, and Inbound Investment for Selected Industries (2010).Google Scholar

Vander Kooi, Joel, The ASEAN Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism: Doing It the “ASEAN Way,” 20 N.Y. Int’l L. Rev. 1 (2007).Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth J., The Political Economy of a Bilateral Investment Treaty, 92 Am. J. Int’l. L. 621 (1998).Google Scholar

Vandevelde, Kenneth J., Sustainable Liberalism and the International Investment Regime, 19 Mich. J. Int’l. L. 373 (1998).Google Scholar

Van Rijckeghem, Caroline & Weder, Beatrice, Corruption and the Role of Temptation: Do Law Wages in the Civil Service Cause Corruption?, IMF Working Paper WP/97/73 ( 1997 ).Google Scholar

Verico, Kiki, The Future of the ASEAN Economic Integration (2017).Google Scholar

Viterbo, Annamaria, Iceland’s Capital Controls and the Constraints Imposed by the EEA Agreement, 6 Cap. Mar. Law J. 214 (2011).Google Scholar

Viterbo, Annamaria, How to Make the GATS a Code of Conduct for Capital Controls, in Capital Account Regulations and the Trading System: A Compatibility Review 20 (Gallagher, Kevin et al. ed., 2013).Google Scholar

Viterbo, Annamaria, Tensions between International Investment Protection and Financial Stability, in The Future of ICSID and the Place of Investment Treaties in International Law 192 (Calamita, N. Jansen et al. eds., 2013).Google Scholar

Wade, Robert, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (1990).Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System (1974).Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (1979).Google Scholar

Wardekker, Willem L., Identity, Plurality, and Education, in Philosophy of Education 1995 (Neiman, Alven ed., 1995).Google Scholar

Watson, Alan, Law in Books, Law in Action and Society (Apr. 12, 2006) (paper presented as part of the Faculty Colloquium Series, School of Law, Univ. of Georgia, Apr. 12, 2006, Paper No. 1), https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/conf_coll_symp_colloquia/1/.Google Scholar

Wells, Louis T. & Ahmed, Rafiq, Making Foreign Investment Safe: Property Rights and National Sovereignty (2007 ).Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics, 46 Int’l Org. 391 (1992).Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Collective Identity Formation and the International State, 88 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 384 (1994).Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, The Social Theory of International Politics (1999).Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, The State as Person in International Theory, 30 Rev. Int’l Stud. 289 (2004).Google Scholar

Weber, Max, Science as a Vocation, in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology 139 (Gerth, Hans Heinrich & Mills, Charles Wright trans. & eds., 1946).Google Scholar

Weintraub, Andrew N., Power Plays: Wayang Golek Puppet Theatre of West Java, Southeast Asia Series, Vol. 110 (2004).Google Scholar

Westerman, Pauline, Introduction in Outsourcing the Law: A Philosophical Perspective on Regulation (2018).Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985).Google Scholar

Wilson, Bryan R., A Sociologist’s Introduction, in Rationality x (Wilson, Bryan R. ed., 1970).Google Scholar

Wolfe, Robert, See you in Geneva! Legal (Mis)representations of the Trading system, 11 Eur. J. Int’l Rel. 339 (2005).Google Scholar

Wonnacott, Ronald, Trade and Investment in a Hub-and Spoke System versus a Free Trade Area, 19 World Econ. 237 (1996).Google Scholar

Working Party on GATS Rules, Negotiations on Emergency Safeguard Measures: Report by the Chairperson of the Working Party on GATS Rules, WTO Doc. S/WPGR/9 (Mar. 14, 2003).Google Scholar

World Bank, Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/.Google Scholar

World Bank Group, Global Value Chain Development Report 2017: Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of GVCs on Economic Development (2017), https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29593.Google Scholar

WTO, The Relationship between Trade and Investment, WTO Doc. WT/WGTI/W/7 (Sept. 8, 1997).Google Scholar

Xuetong, Yan, Xun Zi’s Thoughts on International Politics and Their Implications, 2 Chinese J. Int’l Pol. 135 (2008).Google Scholar

Yackee, Jason Webb, Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence, 51 Virg. J. Int’l L. 405 (2010).Google Scholar

Yen, Trinh Hai, Fragmented Approaches to Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Intra-ASEAN and Extra-ASEAN Investment Treaties, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms 252 (Hsieh, Pasha & Mercurio, Bryan eds., 2019).Google Scholar

Yerkey, Gary G., Sen. Baucus Calls WTO “Kangaroo Court” with Strong “Bias” against the United States, 19 Int’l Trade Rep. (BNA) 1679 (2002).Google Scholar

Yuzawa, Takeshi, The Fallacy of Socialization?: Rethinking the ASEAN Way of Institution-Building, in ASEAN and the Institutionalization of East Asia 75, 81 (Emmers, Ralf ed., 2012).Google Scholar