Book contents
- Inventing Hebrews
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Inventing Hebrews
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Structuring Hebrews
- Part 1 Laying the Foundation
- Part 2 Arranging the Speech
- Bibliography
- Scripture Index
- Ancient Sources Index
- Modern Authors Index
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2018
Book contents
- Inventing Hebrews
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Inventing Hebrews
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- 1 Structuring Hebrews
- Part 1 Laying the Foundation
- Part 2 Arranging the Speech
- Bibliography
- Scripture Index
- Ancient Sources Index
- Modern Authors Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Inventing HebrewsDesign and Purpose in Ancient Rhetoric, pp. 271 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bibliography
Allen, David M. “Who, What, Why? The Worship of the Firstborn in Hebrews 1:6.” Pages 159–75 in Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism: Essays in Honor of Larry Hurtado. Edited by Keith, Chris and Roth, Dieter. The Library of New Testament Studies 528. London: T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Aletti, Jean-Noël. “La présence d’un modèle rhétorique en Romains: Son role et son importance.” Biblica 71 (1990): 1–24.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Quid Athenis et Hierosdolymis? Rabbinic Midrash and Hermeneutics in the Graeco-Roman World.” Pages 97–115 in A Tribute to Géza Vermès: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History. Edited by Davies, Philip R. and White, Richard T.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 100. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Amador, J. D. H. “Revisiting 2 Corinthians: Rhetoric and the Case of Unity.” New Testament Studies 46 (2000): 92–111.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kevin L. Hebrews: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. “Paraenesis in a Homily (λόγος παρακλήσεως): The Possible Location of, and Socialization in, the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’” Semeia 50 (1990): 211–226.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. “The Psalms in Hebrews.” Pages 197–212 in The Psalms in the New Testament. Edited by Moyise, Steve and Menken, Maarten J. J.. New Testament and the Scriptures of Israel. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Aune, David E. “The Use and Abuse of Enthymeme in New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 49 (2003): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. Der Hebräerbrief. Regensburger Neues Testament. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 2009.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. “How to Entertain Angels: Ethics in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 149–175 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods – New Insights. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. Der Neue Bund und das Werden der Kirche: die Diatheke-Deutung des Hebräerbrief im Rahmen der frühchristlichen Theologiegeschichte. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen 29. Münster: Aschendorff, 1996.Google Scholar
Barclay, John. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora: From Alexander to Trajan 323 BCE–117 CE. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.Google Scholar
Barnard, Jody A. “Anti-Jewish Interpretations of Hebrews: Some Neglected Factors.” Melilah 11 (2014): 29–34.Google Scholar
Barnard, Jody A. The Mysticism of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/331. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “The Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 15–36 in The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Edited by Bauckham, R., Driver, Daniel R., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Baugh, S. M. “Hyperbaton and Greek Literary Style in Hebrews.” Novum Testamentum 59 (2017): 194–213.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H., and Erskine, Andrew. “Form and Function.” Pages 1–17 in Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Edited by Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. “The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians.” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 353–379.Google Scholar
Black, C. Clifton II. “The Rhetorical Form of the Hellenistic Jewish and Early Christian Sermon: A Response to Lawrence Wills.” Harvard Theological Review 81 (1988): 1–18.Google Scholar
Boccaccini, Gabriele. “The Evilness of Human Nature in 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Paul, and 4 Ezra: A Second Temple Jewish Debate.” Pages 63–79 in Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch: Reconstruction after the Fall. Edited by Henze, Matthias and Boccaccini, Gabriele. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 164. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. “Das Bekenntnis im Hebräerbrief.” Pages 188–203 in Studien zu Antike und Urchristentum: Gesammelte Aufsätze, Volume 2. Edited by Bornkamm, Günther. Beiträge zur evangelischen Theologie 28. Munich: Kaiser, 1963.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. “Names and Number in Early Christianity.” New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 267–288.Google Scholar
Brauw, Michael de. “The Parts of the Speech.” Pages 187–202 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Bruce, Frederick F. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar
Büschel, F. “Hebräerbrief.” Pages 1669–1673 in vol. 2 of Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Handwörterbuch für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft. Edited by Gunkel, H. and Zscharnack, L.. 2nd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1928.Google Scholar
Byron, John. “Living in the Shadow of Cain: Echoes of a Developing Tradition in James 5:1–6.” Novum Testamentum 48 (2006): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caird, George B. “Son by Appointment.” Pages 73–81 in vol. 1 of The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke. Edited by Weinrich, W. C.. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Caneday, Ardel B. “The Eschatological World Already Subjected to the Son.” Pages 28–39 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Catto, Stephen K. Reconstructing the First-Century Synagogue: A Critical Analysis of Current Research. The Library of New Testament Studies 363. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Cockerill, Gareth Lee. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas A. “Philo of Alexandria.” Pages 695–713 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas A. “The Enthymeme in Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 166–187.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Mary. Moses in the Letter to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 42. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric.” Hebrew Union College Annual 22 (1979): 239–64.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, Reinhard. Gotteshymnus und Christushymnus in der frühen Christenheit. Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967.Google Scholar
DeSilva, David. A. Despising Shame: Honor Discourse and Community Maintenance in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 152. Atlanta: Scholars, 1995.Google Scholar
DeSilva, David. A. Perseverance in Gratitude: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Epistle “to the Hebrews”. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Duff, Tim. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Eisenbaum, Pamela. Jewish Heroes of Christian History: Hebrews 11 in Literary Context. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 156. Atlanta: Scholars, 1997.Google Scholar
Ellingworth, Paul. The Epistle to the Hebrews: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. E. The Old Testament in Early Christianity: Canon and Interpretation in the Light of Modern Research. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1991.Google Scholar
Erbse, Hartmut. “Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs.” Hermes 84 (1956): 398–424.Google Scholar
Eskola, Timo. Messiah and the Throne. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/142. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar
Esler, Philip. “Collective Memory and Hebrews 11: Outlining a New Investigative Framework.” Pages 151–171 in Memory, Tradition and Text: The Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Edited by Kirk, Alan and Thatcher, Tom. Semeia Studies 52. Leiden, Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Filson, Floyd V. “Yesterday”: A Study of Hebrews in the Light of Chapter 13. Studies in Biblical Theology 4. Naperville: Allenson, 1967.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. “Creation and Salvation in Hebrews.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 280–303.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. The Identity of God’s People and the Paradox of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/400. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob, and Wessbrandt, Martin. “Exploring the High Priesthood of Jesus in Early Christian Sources.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 96–114.Google Scholar
France, R. T. “The Writer of Hebrews as Biblical Expositor.” Tyndale Bulletin 47 (1996): 246–276.Google Scholar
Frankowski, Janusz. “Early Christian Hymns Recorded in the New Testament: A Reconsideration of the Question in Light of Heb 1, 3.” Biblische Zeitschrift 27 (1983): 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gäbel, Georg. Die Kulttheologie des Hebräerbriefes: Eine exegetisch-religionsgeschichtliche Studie. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/212. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Geiger, Joseph. “Nepos and Plutarch: From Latin to Greek Political Biography.” Illinois Classical Studies 13 (1988): 245–256.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “From ‘Linguistic Turn’ and Hebrews Scholarship to Anadiplosis Iterata: The Enigma of Structure.” Harvard Theological Review 102 (2009): 51–72.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Hebrews, Homiletics, and Liturgical Scripture Interpretation.” Pages 121–144 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Rhetorical Criticism in Hebrews Scholarship: Avenues and Aporias.” Pages 213–236 in Method and Meaning: Essays on New Testament Interpretation in Honor of Harold W. Attridge. Edited by McGowan, Andrew B. and Richards, Kent Harold. Resources for Biblical Study 67. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Verhärtet eure Herzen nicht”: Der Hebräer, eine Synagogenhomilie zu Tischa Be-Aw. Biblical Interpretation Series 83. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. “The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism.” The Classical Quarterly (1984): 149–166.Google Scholar
Gräbe, Peter “The New Covenant and Christian Identity in Hebrews.” Pages 118–127 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Gräßer, Erich. An die Hebräer: Hebr 1–6. Evangelische-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 17/1. Zürich: Benziger Verlag/Neukirchener Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jonathan I. Hebrews and Divine Speech. The Library of New Testament Studies 507. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Grillo, Luca. Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Guthrie, George H. “Hebrews in Its First-Century Contexts: Recent Research.” Pages 413–443 in The Face of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research. Edited by McKnight, Scot and Osborne, Grant R.. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar
Guthrie, George H. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 73. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Guzmán, Ron, and Martin, Michael W.. “Is Hebrews 5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?” Novum Testamentum 57 (2015): 295–310.Google Scholar
Gyllenberg, Rafael. “Die Komposition des Hebräerbriefs.” Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 22–23 (1957–1958): 137–147.Google Scholar
Hahn, Scott. “A Broken Covenant and the Curse of Death: A Study of Hebrews 9:15–22.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66 (2004): 416–436.Google Scholar
Hearing, Theodor. “Gedankengang und Grundgedanken des Hebräerbriefs.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 18 (1917–1918): 145–164.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Codifications of Rhetoric.” Pages 59–74 in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Invention.” Pages 89–119 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Theon and the Progymnasmata.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 43 (2002): 129–160.Google Scholar
Heil, John Paul. Hebrews: Chiastic Structures and Audience Response. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 46. Washington D. C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2010.Google Scholar
Highet, Gilbert. The Speeches of Vergil’s Aeneid. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Horton, Fred L. The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society for the Study of the New Testament Monograph Series 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Horrell, David H. “Ethnicisation, Marriage, and Early Christian Identity: Critical Reflections on 1 Corinthians 7, 1 Peter 3 and Modern New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Philip E. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar
Huizenga, Leroy A. The New Isaac: Tradition and Intertextuality in the Gospel of Matthew. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 131. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D. “The Christology of Hebrews 1 and 2.” Pages 151–164 in The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird. Edited by Hurst, L. D. and Wright, N. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Marie E. Reading Hebrews and James: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Macon: Smyth and Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar
Jamieson, R. B. “Hebrews 9.23: Cult Inauguration, Yom Kippur and the Cleansing of the Heavenly Tabernacle.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jipp, Joshua W. “The Son’s Entrance into the Heavenly World: The Soteriological Necessity of the Scriptural Catena in Hebrews 1.5–14.” New Testament Studies 56 (2010): 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. Hebrews: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006.Google Scholar
Joslin, Barry C. “Can Hebrews Be Structured? An Assessment of Eight Approaches.” Currents in Biblical Research 6 (2007): 99–129.Google Scholar
Karrer, Martin. Der Brief an die Hebräer: Kapitel 5,11–13,25. Ökumenischer Taschenbush-Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 20/2. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2008.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. “Historical Survey of Rhetoric.” Pages 3–41 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: SBL, 2003.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. Hebrews: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 36. New York: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. “Hebrews, Rhetoric, and the Future of Humanity.” Pages 99–120 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atalnta: SBL, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Manfred. “Theories and Practice of Enthymeme in the First Centuries B.C.E. and C.E.” Pages 95–111 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G. Introduction to the New Testament. Translated by Kee, H. C.. Nashville: Abingdon, 1975.Google Scholar
Laansma, Jon. “I Will Give You Rest”: The Rest Motif in the New Testament with Special Reference to MT 11 and Heb 3–4. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/98. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.Google Scholar
Lampe, Peter. “Rhetorical Analysis of Pauline Texts—Quo Vadit?” Pages 3–24 in Paul and Rhetoric. Edited by Sampley, J. Paul and Lampe, Peter. New York: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Paul David. “The Structure of Hebrews: A Word of Exhortation in Light of the Day of Atonement.” Pages 19–27 in A Cloud of Witnesses: A Theology of Hebrews in its Ancient Contexts. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Lane, William L. Hebrews 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991.Google Scholar
Larmour, David H. J. “Making Parallels: Synkrisis and Plutarch’s ‘Themistocles and Camillus’.” ANRW 33.6: 4154–4200. Part 2, Principat, 33.6. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York: de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Edited by Orton, David and Anderson, R. Dean. Translated by Bliss, Matthew, Jansen, Annemiek, and Orton, David. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Lehne, Susanne. The New Covenant in Hebrews. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 44. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. The Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son: The Transformation of Child Sacrifice in Judaism and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lindars, Barnabas. “The Rhetorical Structure of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 35 (1989): 382–406.Google Scholar
Lindsay, William. Lectures on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Edinburgh: William Oliphant, 1867.Google Scholar
Loader, William R. G. Sohn und Hoherpriester: Eine traitionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Christologie des Hebräerbriefes. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 53. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1981.Google Scholar
Löhr, Hermut. “Reflections of Rhetorical Terminology in Hebrews.” Pages 199–210 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods—New Insights. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Atlanta: SBL, 2005.Google Scholar
Long, Frederick J. Ancient Rhetoric and Paul’s Apology: The Compositional Unity of 2 Corinthians. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Richard N. Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975.Google Scholar
Lünnemann, Gottlieb. Handbuch über den Hebräerbrief. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1864.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. Judas and the Rhetoric of Syncrisis in the Fourth Gospel. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. “The Poetry of the Lord’s Prayer: A Study in Poetic Device.” Journal of Biblical Literature 134 (2015): 347–372.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. “Progymnastic Topic Lists: A Compositional Template for Luke and Other Bioi?” New Testament Studies 54 (2008): 18–41.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Nash, Bryan. “Philippians 2:6–11 as Subversive Hymnos: A Study in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Theory.” Journal of Theological Studies 66 (2015): 90–138.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 58 (2012): 379–400.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “The Encomiastic Topics of Syncrisis as the Key to the Structure and Argument of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 57 (2011): 415–439.Google Scholar
Martin, Troy W., ed. Genealogies of New Testament Rhetorical Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar
Martin, Troy W., ed. “Invention and Arrangement in Recent Pauline Studies: A Survey of the Practices and the Problems.” Pages 48–118 in Paul and the Ancient Letter Form. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A.. Pauline Studies 6. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Mason, Eric F. “You Are a Priest Forever”: Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 74. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Meier, J. P. “Symmetry and Theology in the Old Testament Citations in Heb 1,5–14.” Biblica 66 (1985): 504–533.Google Scholar
Michel, Otto. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Übersetzt und erklärt. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966.Google Scholar
Moffatt, James. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1979.Google Scholar
Moffitt, David M. Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 141. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Moffitt, David M. “But We Do See Abel: Hebrews and the Depiction of Abel’s Sacrifice in Some Mosaics of Ravenna.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar
Murphy, James Jerome. Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. Paul the Letter Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills. Good News Studies 41. Collegeville: Michael Glazier, 1995.Google Scholar
Nauck, Wolfgang. “Zum Aufbau des Hebräerbriefes.” Pages 199–206 in Judentum, Urchristentum, Kirche, Festschrift für Joachim Jeremias. Edited by Eltester, Walter. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 26. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1960.Google Scholar
Neeley, Linda L. “A Discourse Analysis of Hebrews.” Occasional Papers in Translation and Textlinguistics 3–4 (1987): 1–146.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. “Encomion Versus Vituperation: Contrasting Portraits of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007): 529–552.Google Scholar
Nissilä, Keijo. Das Hohepriestermotiv im Hebräerbrief: Eine Exegetische Untersuchung. Schriften der Finnischen Exegetischen Gesellschaft 33. Helsinki: Oy Liiton Kirjapaino, 1979.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Peter. The Letter to the Hebrews. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Olbricht, Thomas H. “Anticipating and Presenting the Case for Christ as High Priest in Hebrews.” Pages 355–372 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar
Olbricht, Thomas H. “Hebrews as Amplification.” Pages 375–387 in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. “The Ruler Power: A Study of the Roman Empire in the Second Century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43/4 (1953): 871–1003.Google Scholar
Pelling, Christopher. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. London: Duckworth, 2002.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. “The Historical Example, Its Use and Importance as Political Propaganda in the Attic Orators.” Pages 150–166 in Studies in History. Edited by Fuks, Alexander and Halpern, Israel. Scripta Hierosolymitana 7. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961.Google Scholar
Perry, Peter S. The Rhetoric of Digressions: Revelation 7:1–17 and 10:1–11:13 and Ancient Communication. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/268. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Peterson, David. Hebrews and Perfection: An Examination of the Concept of Perfection in the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’ Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pierce, Madison N. “Intra-Divine Discourse and the New Covenant in Hebrews: Subtext(s) in Hebrews 8–10.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar
Rissi, Mathias. Die Theologie des Hebräerbriefs: Ihre Verankerung in der Situation des Verfassers und seiner Leser. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 41. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar
Robertson, John C. The Gorgianic Figures in Early Greek Prose. Baltimore: Friedenwald, 1893.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Clare K. Hebrews as Pseudepigraphon: The History and Significance of the Pauline Attribution of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/235. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. “On Reading Plutarch’s Lives.” Pages 73–98 in Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Edited by Scardigli, B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sanders, Jack T. The New Testament Christological Hymns: Their Historical Religious Background. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 15. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1971.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. 14 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1889.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “A Celebration of the Enthroned Son: The Catena of Hebrews 1.” Journal of Biblical Literature 120 (2001): 469–485.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. Cosmology and Eschatology in Hebrews: The Settings of Sacrifice. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “Keeping His Appointment: Creation and Enthronement in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 66 (1997): 91–117.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “The Worship of Jesus among Early Christians: The Evidence from Hebrews.” Pages 114–126 in Jesus and Paul: Global Perspectives in Honor of James D. G. Dunn on His 70th Birthday. Edited by Oropeza, B. J., Robertson, C. K., and Mohrmann, Douglas C.. The Library of New Testament Studies 414. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Schnelle, Udo. “Das frühe Christentum und die Bildung.” New Testament Studies 61 (2015): 113–143.Google Scholar
Schunack, Gerd. Der Hebräerbrief. Zürcher Bibelkommentare Neuen Testament 14. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2002.Google Scholar
Seid, Timothy W. “Synkrisis in Hebrews 7: Rhetorical Structure and Analysis.” Pages 322–347 in The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture: Essays from the 1996 Malibu Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Stamps, Dennis L.. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Siegert, Folker. “Homily and Panegyrical Sermon.” Pages 421–443 in Handbook of Classic Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Sheerin, Daniel. “Rhetorical and Hermeneutic Synkrisis in Patristic Typology.” Pages 22–39 in Nova & Vetera Patristic Studies in Honor of Thomas Patrick Halton. Edited by Petruccione, John. Washington D. C.: Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Small, Brian C. The Characterization of Jesus in the Book of Hebrews. Biblical Interpretation Series 128. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” American Journal of Philology 62 (1941): 35–50, 169–190.Google Scholar
Son, Kiwoong. Zion Symbolism in Hebrews: Hebrews 12:18–24 as a Hermeneutical Key to the Epistle. Paternoster Biblical Monographs. Milton Keys: Paternoster, 2005.Google Scholar
Spicq, Ceslas. L’Épître aux Hébreux. 2 vols. Echter Bibel. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1952-1953.Google Scholar
Standaert, Benoît. L’évangile selon Marc: Composition et genre littéraire. Nijmegen: Stichting Studentenpers, 1978.Google Scholar
Stanley, Steve. “The Structure of Hebrews from Three Perspectives.” Tyndale Bulletin 45 (1994): 245–71.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine. “Divisions of Speech.” Pages 77–91 in A Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stegemann, Ekkehard W., and Stegemann, Wolfgang. “Hebrews and the Discourse of Judeophobia.” Pages 357–69 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Stegner, William Richard. “The Ancient Jewish Synagogue Homily.” Pages 51–69 in Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament. Edited by Aune, David E.. Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study 21. Atlanta: Scholars, 1988.Google Scholar
Stermberger, Günter. “Response.” Pages 45–48 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Stermberger, Günter. “The Derashah in Rabbinic Times.” Pages 7–21 Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. From Prophecy to Preaching: A Survey for the Origins of the Christian Homily. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 59. Leiden: Brill, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. The Lamb’s High Feast: Melito, Peri Pascha and the Quartodeciman Paschal Liturgy at Sardis. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 42. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jesper. “Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? On the Reception History of Hebrews 8:13.” Pages 316–342 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Swetnam, James. Jesus and Isaac: A Study of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Light of the Aqedah. Analecta Biblica 94. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1981.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Reading Corinthians: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Rev. ed. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Reading John: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles. Rev. ed. Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2005.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. “The Way of the Lukan Jesus: Dimensions of Lukan Spirituality.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 9 (1982): 237–49.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H., and Whitlark, Jason. Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Thiessen, Matthew. “Hebrews 12.5–13, the Wilderness Period, and Israel’s Discipline.” New Testament Studies 55 (2009): 366–379.Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. “Argument and Persuasion in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 39 (2012): 361–377.Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. The Beginnings of Christian Philosophy: The Epistle to the Hebrews. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 13. Washington D.C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1982.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri. “The General New Testament Writings.” Pages 587–607 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Thyen, Hartwig. Der Stil der jüdisch-hellenistischen Homilie. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1955.Google Scholar
Übelacker, Walter G. Der Hebräerbrief als Appell: Untersuchungen zu exordium, narratio, und postscriptum (Hebr 1–2 und 13, 22–25). Coniectanea Biblica: New Testament Series 21. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1989.Google Scholar
Übelacker, Walter G. “Hebrews and the Implied Author’s Rhetorical Ethos.” Pages 316–334 in Rhetoric, Ethic, and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse: Essays from the 2002 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Olbricht, Thomas H. and Eriksson, Anders. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 11. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Usher, Stephen. “Symbouleutic Oratory.” Pages 220–235 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Vaganay, Leon. “La plan de l’Épître aux Hébreux.” Pages 269–277 in Memorial Lagrange. Edited by Vincent, L.-H.. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1940.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. A Structured Translation of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Translated by Swetnam, James. Biblica, Subsidia 12. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1964.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épître aux Hébreux. 2nd ed. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1976.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épitre aux Hébreux. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1963.Google Scholar
Visotzky, Burton L. “Midrash, Christian Exegesis and the Hellenistic Hermeneutic.” Pages 111–131 in Current Trends in the Study of Midrash. Edited by Bakhos, C.. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 106. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
von Soden, Hermann. Hebräerbrief, Briefe des Petrus, Jakobus, Judas. Hand-Commentar zum neuen Testament 3. Tubingen: Mohr, 1899.Google Scholar
von Stockhausen, Annette. “Christian Perception of Jewish Preaching in Early Christianity?” Pages 49–70 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, A. J. M. “The ‘Letter’ to the Hebrews and Its Thirteenth Chapter.” New Testament Studies 50 (2004): 390–405.Google Scholar
Weiss, Hans-Friedrich. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 15. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991.Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia L. A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning. The Library of New Testament Studies 297. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Whitfield, Bryan J. Joshua Traditions and the Argument of Hebrews 3 and 4. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 194. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “Cosmology and the Perfection of Humanity in Hebrews.” Pages 117–130 in Interpretation and the Claims of the Text: Resourcing New Testament Theology. Edited by Whitlark, Jason A., Longenecker, Bruce W., Novakovic, Lidija, and Parsons, Mikeal C.. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. Enabling Fidelity to God: Perseverance in Hebrews in Light of the Reciprocity Systems of the Ancient Mediterranean World. Paternoster Biblical Mongraphs. Milton Keyes: Paternoster Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “Fidelity and New Covenant Enablement in Hebrews.” Pages 72–91 in Talbert, Charles H. and Whitlark, Jason A., Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “The God of Peace and His Victorious King: Hebrews 13:20–21 and Its Roman Imperial Context.” Pages 155–178 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Attridge, Harold W. and Gelardini, Gabriella. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. Resisting Empire: Rethinking the Purpose of the Letter to “the Hebrews.” The Library of New Testament Studies 484. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “The Warning against Idolatry: An Intertextual Examination of Septuagintal Warnings in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2012): 382–401.Google Scholar
Wills, Lawrence. “The Form of the Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity.” Harvard Theological Review 77 (1984): 277–283.Google Scholar
Windisch, Hans. Der Hebräerbrief: Handbuch zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1931.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James, and Jude. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. The Indelible Image: The Theological and Ethical Thought World of the New Testament, Vol. 2: The Collective Witness. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wuellner, Wilhelm. “Arrangement.” Pages 51–87 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Heinrich. Das Bekenntnis der Hoffnung: Tradition und Redaktion im Hebräerbrief. Boner biblische Beiträge. Koeln: Peter Hanstein Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Zoido, Juan Carlos Iglesias. “The Battle Exhortation in Ancient Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 25 (2007): 141–158.Google Scholar
Allen, David M. “Who, What, Why? The Worship of the Firstborn in Hebrews 1:6.” Pages 159–75 in Mark, Manuscripts, and Monotheism: Essays in Honor of Larry Hurtado. Edited by Keith, Chris and Roth, Dieter. The Library of New Testament Studies 528. London: T&T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Aletti, Jean-Noël. “La présence d’un modèle rhétorique en Romains: Son role et son importance.” Biblica 71 (1990): 1–24.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “Quid Athenis et Hierosdolymis? Rabbinic Midrash and Hermeneutics in the Graeco-Roman World.” Pages 97–115 in A Tribute to Géza Vermès: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History. Edited by Davies, Philip R. and White, Richard T.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 100. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Amador, J. D. H. “Revisiting 2 Corinthians: Rhetoric and the Case of Unity.” New Testament Studies 46 (2000): 92–111.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kevin L. Hebrews: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. New Beacon Bible Commentary. Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. “Paraenesis in a Homily (λόγος παρακλήσεως): The Possible Location of, and Socialization in, the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’” Semeia 50 (1990): 211–226.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. The Epistle to the Hebrews. Hermeneia. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold W. “The Psalms in Hebrews.” Pages 197–212 in The Psalms in the New Testament. Edited by Moyise, Steve and Menken, Maarten J. J.. New Testament and the Scriptures of Israel. London: T&T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar
Aune, David E. “The Use and Abuse of Enthymeme in New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 49 (2003): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. Der Hebräerbrief. Regensburger Neues Testament. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 2009.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. “How to Entertain Angels: Ethics in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 149–175 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods – New Insights. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2005.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Knut. Der Neue Bund und das Werden der Kirche: die Diatheke-Deutung des Hebräerbrief im Rahmen der frühchristlichen Theologiegeschichte. Neutestamentliche Abhandlungen 29. Münster: Aschendorff, 1996.Google Scholar
Barclay, John. Jews in the Mediterranean Diaspora: From Alexander to Trajan 323 BCE–117 CE. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1996.Google Scholar
Barnard, Jody A. “Anti-Jewish Interpretations of Hebrews: Some Neglected Factors.” Melilah 11 (2014): 29–34.Google Scholar
Barnard, Jody A. The Mysticism of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/331. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2012.Google Scholar
Bauckham, Richard. “The Divinity of Jesus Christ in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Pages 15–36 in The Epistle to the Hebrews and Christian Theology. Edited by Bauckham, R., Driver, Daniel R., Hart, Trevor A., and MacDonald, Nathan. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Baugh, S. M. “Hyperbaton and Greek Literary Style in Hebrews.” Novum Testamentum 59 (2017): 194–213.Google Scholar
Berry, D. H., and Erskine, Andrew. “Form and Function.” Pages 1–17 in Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Edited by Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter. “The Literary Composition and Function of Paul’s Letter to the Galatians.” New Testament Studies 21 (1975): 353–379.Google Scholar
Black, C. Clifton II. “The Rhetorical Form of the Hellenistic Jewish and Early Christian Sermon: A Response to Lawrence Wills.” Harvard Theological Review 81 (1988): 1–18.Google Scholar
Boccaccini, Gabriele. “The Evilness of Human Nature in 1 Enoch, Jubilees, Paul, and 4 Ezra: A Second Temple Jewish Debate.” Pages 63–79 in Fourth Ezra and Second Baruch: Reconstruction after the Fall. Edited by Henze, Matthias and Boccaccini, Gabriele. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 164. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. “Das Bekenntnis im Hebräerbrief.” Pages 188–203 in Studien zu Antike und Urchristentum: Gesammelte Aufsätze, Volume 2. Edited by Bornkamm, Günther. Beiträge zur evangelischen Theologie 28. Munich: Kaiser, 1963.Google Scholar
Bovon, François. “Names and Number in Early Christianity.” New Testament Studies 47 (2001): 267–288.Google Scholar
Brauw, Michael de. “The Parts of the Speech.” Pages 187–202 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Bruce, Frederick F. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990.Google Scholar
Büschel, F. “Hebräerbrief.” Pages 1669–1673 in vol. 2 of Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Handwörterbuch für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft. Edited by Gunkel, H. and Zscharnack, L.. 2nd ed. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1928.Google Scholar
Byron, John. “Living in the Shadow of Cain: Echoes of a Developing Tradition in James 5:1–6.” Novum Testamentum 48 (2006): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caird, George B. “Son by Appointment.” Pages 73–81 in vol. 1 of The New Testament Age: Essays in Honor of Bo Reicke. Edited by Weinrich, W. C.. Macon: Mercer University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Caneday, Ardel B. “The Eschatological World Already Subjected to the Son.” Pages 28–39 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Catto, Stephen K. Reconstructing the First-Century Synagogue: A Critical Analysis of Current Research. The Library of New Testament Studies 363. London: T&T Clark, 2007.Google Scholar
Cockerill, Gareth Lee. The Epistle to the Hebrews. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2012.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas A. “Philo of Alexandria.” Pages 695–713 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas A. “The Enthymeme in Perspective.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 166–187.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, Mary. Moses in the Letter to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 42. Missoula: Scholars Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Daube, David. “Rabbinic Methods of Interpretation and Hellenistic Rhetoric.” Hebrew Union College Annual 22 (1979): 239–64.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, Reinhard. Gotteshymnus und Christushymnus in der frühen Christenheit. Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments 5. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967.Google Scholar
DeSilva, David. A. Despising Shame: Honor Discourse and Community Maintenance in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 152. Atlanta: Scholars, 1995.Google Scholar
DeSilva, David. A. Perseverance in Gratitude: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on the Epistle “to the Hebrews”. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Duff, Tim. Plutarch’s Lives: Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Eisenbaum, Pamela. Jewish Heroes of Christian History: Hebrews 11 in Literary Context. Society of Biblical Literature Dissertation Series 156. Atlanta: Scholars, 1997.Google Scholar
Ellingworth, Paul. The Epistle to the Hebrews: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1993.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. E. The Old Testament in Early Christianity: Canon and Interpretation in the Light of Modern Research. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1991.Google Scholar
Erbse, Hartmut. “Die Bedeutung der Synkrisis in den Parallelbiographien Plutarchs.” Hermes 84 (1956): 398–424.Google Scholar
Eskola, Timo. Messiah and the Throne. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/142. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2001.Google Scholar
Esler, Philip. “Collective Memory and Hebrews 11: Outlining a New Investigative Framework.” Pages 151–171 in Memory, Tradition and Text: The Uses of the Past in Early Christianity. Edited by Kirk, Alan and Thatcher, Tom. Semeia Studies 52. Leiden, Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Filson, Floyd V. “Yesterday”: A Study of Hebrews in the Light of Chapter 13. Studies in Biblical Theology 4. Naperville: Allenson, 1967.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. “Creation and Salvation in Hebrews.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 280–303.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob. The Identity of God’s People and the Paradox of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/400. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar
Filtvedt, Ole Jakob, and Wessbrandt, Martin. “Exploring the High Priesthood of Jesus in Early Christian Sources.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 106 (2015): 96–114.Google Scholar
France, R. T. “The Writer of Hebrews as Biblical Expositor.” Tyndale Bulletin 47 (1996): 246–276.Google Scholar
Frankowski, Janusz. “Early Christian Hymns Recorded in the New Testament: A Reconsideration of the Question in Light of Heb 1, 3.” Biblische Zeitschrift 27 (1983): 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gäbel, Georg. Die Kulttheologie des Hebräerbriefes: Eine exegetisch-religionsgeschichtliche Studie. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/212. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.Google Scholar
Geiger, Joseph. “Nepos and Plutarch: From Latin to Greek Political Biography.” Illinois Classical Studies 13 (1988): 245–256.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “From ‘Linguistic Turn’ and Hebrews Scholarship to Anadiplosis Iterata: The Enigma of Structure.” Harvard Theological Review 102 (2009): 51–72.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Hebrews, Homiletics, and Liturgical Scripture Interpretation.” Pages 121–144 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Rhetorical Criticism in Hebrews Scholarship: Avenues and Aporias.” Pages 213–236 in Method and Meaning: Essays on New Testament Interpretation in Honor of Harold W. Attridge. Edited by McGowan, Andrew B. and Richards, Kent Harold. Resources for Biblical Study 67. Atlanta: SBL, 2011.Google Scholar
Gelardini, Gabriella. “Verhärtet eure Herzen nicht”: Der Hebräer, eine Synagogenhomilie zu Tischa Be-Aw. Biblical Interpretation Series 83. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher. “The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism.” The Classical Quarterly (1984): 149–166.Google Scholar
Gräbe, Peter “The New Covenant and Christian Identity in Hebrews.” Pages 118–127 in A Cloud of Witnesses: The Theology of Hebrews in Its Ancient Context. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Gräßer, Erich. An die Hebräer: Hebr 1–6. Evangelische-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 17/1. Zürich: Benziger Verlag/Neukirchener Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Jonathan I. Hebrews and Divine Speech. The Library of New Testament Studies 507. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Grillo, Luca. Cicero’s De Provinciis Consularibus Oratio. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Guthrie, George H. “Hebrews in Its First-Century Contexts: Recent Research.” Pages 413–443 in The Face of New Testament Studies: A Survey of Recent Research. Edited by McKnight, Scot and Osborne, Grant R.. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004.Google Scholar
Guthrie, George H. The Structure of Hebrews: A Text-Linguistic Analysis. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 73. Leiden: Brill, 1994.Google Scholar
Guzmán, Ron, and Martin, Michael W.. “Is Hebrews 5:11–6:20 Really a Digression?” Novum Testamentum 57 (2015): 295–310.Google Scholar
Gyllenberg, Rafael. “Die Komposition des Hebräerbriefs.” Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 22–23 (1957–1958): 137–147.Google Scholar
Hahn, Scott. “A Broken Covenant and the Curse of Death: A Study of Hebrews 9:15–22.” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 66 (2004): 416–436.Google Scholar
Hearing, Theodor. “Gedankengang und Grundgedanken des Hebräerbriefs.” Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 18 (1917–1918): 145–164.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Codifications of Rhetoric.” Pages 59–74 in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Invention.” Pages 89–119 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Theon and the Progymnasmata.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 43 (2002): 129–160.Google Scholar
Heil, John Paul. Hebrews: Chiastic Structures and Audience Response. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 46. Washington D. C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 2010.Google Scholar
Highet, Gilbert. The Speeches of Vergil’s Aeneid. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Horton, Fred L. The Melchizedek Tradition: A Critical Examination of the Sources to the Fifth Century A.D. and in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Society for the Study of the New Testament Monograph Series 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Horrell, David H. “Ethnicisation, Marriage, and Early Christian Identity: Critical Reflections on 1 Corinthians 7, 1 Peter 3 and Modern New Testament Scholarship.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Philip E. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar
Huizenga, Leroy A. The New Isaac: Tradition and Intertextuality in the Gospel of Matthew. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 131. Leiden: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D. “The Christology of Hebrews 1 and 2.” Pages 151–164 in The Glory of Christ in the New Testament: Studies in Christology in Memory of George Bradford Caird. Edited by Hurst, L. D. and Wright, N. T.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, Marie E. Reading Hebrews and James: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Macon: Smyth and Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar
Jamieson, R. B. “Hebrews 9.23: Cult Inauguration, Yom Kippur and the Cleansing of the Heavenly Tabernacle.” New Testament Studies 62 (2016): 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jipp, Joshua W. “The Son’s Entrance into the Heavenly World: The Soteriological Necessity of the Scriptural Catena in Hebrews 1.5–14.” New Testament Studies 56 (2010): 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Luke Timothy. Hebrews: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2006.Google Scholar
Joslin, Barry C. “Can Hebrews Be Structured? An Assessment of Eight Approaches.” Currents in Biblical Research 6 (2007): 99–129.Google Scholar
Karrer, Martin. Der Brief an die Hebräer: Kapitel 5,11–13,25. Ökumenischer Taschenbush-Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 20/2. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2008.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Classical Rhetoric and its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. “Historical Survey of Rhetoric.” Pages 3–41 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: SBL, 2003.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. Hebrews: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible 36. New York: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar
Koester, Craig R. “Hebrews, Rhetoric, and the Future of Humanity.” Pages 99–120 in Reading the Epistle to the Hebrews: A Resource for Students. Edited by Mason, Eric F. and McCruden, Kevin B.. Resources for Biblical Study 66. Atalnta: SBL, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Manfred. “Theories and Practice of Enthymeme in the First Centuries B.C.E. and C.E.” Pages 95–111 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar
Kümmel, W. G. Introduction to the New Testament. Translated by Kee, H. C.. Nashville: Abingdon, 1975.Google Scholar
Laansma, Jon. “I Will Give You Rest”: The Rest Motif in the New Testament with Special Reference to MT 11 and Heb 3–4. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/98. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997.Google Scholar
Lampe, Peter. “Rhetorical Analysis of Pauline Texts—Quo Vadit?” Pages 3–24 in Paul and Rhetoric. Edited by Sampley, J. Paul and Lampe, Peter. New York: T&T Clark, 2010.Google Scholar
Landgraf, Paul David. “The Structure of Hebrews: A Word of Exhortation in Light of the Day of Atonement.” Pages 19–27 in A Cloud of Witnesses: A Theology of Hebrews in its Ancient Contexts. Edited by Bauckham, Richard, Hart, Trevor, MacDonald, Nathan, and Driver, Daniel. The Library of New Testament Studies 387. London: T&T Clark, 2008.Google Scholar
Lane, William L. Hebrews 1–8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991.Google Scholar
Larmour, David H. J. “Making Parallels: Synkrisis and Plutarch’s ‘Themistocles and Camillus’.” ANRW 33.6: 4154–4200. Part 2, Principat, 33.6. Edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase. New York: de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Edited by Orton, David and Anderson, R. Dean. Translated by Bliss, Matthew, Jansen, Annemiek, and Orton, David. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Lehne, Susanne. The New Covenant in Hebrews. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 44. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Levenson, Jon D. The Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son: The Transformation of Child Sacrifice in Judaism and Christianity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Lindars, Barnabas. “The Rhetorical Structure of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 35 (1989): 382–406.Google Scholar
Lindsay, William. Lectures on the Epistle to the Hebrews. Edinburgh: William Oliphant, 1867.Google Scholar
Loader, William R. G. Sohn und Hoherpriester: Eine traitionsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur Christologie des Hebräerbriefes. Wissenschaftliche Monographien zum Alten und Neuen Testament 53. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1981.Google Scholar
Löhr, Hermut. “Reflections of Rhetorical Terminology in Hebrews.” Pages 199–210 in Hebrews: Contemporary Methods—New Insights. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella. Biblical Interpretation Series 75. Atlanta: SBL, 2005.Google Scholar
Long, Frederick J. Ancient Rhetoric and Paul’s Apology: The Compositional Unity of 2 Corinthians. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Richard N. Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975.Google Scholar
Lünnemann, Gottlieb. Handbuch über den Hebräerbrief. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1864.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. Judas and the Rhetoric of Syncrisis in the Fourth Gospel. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix, 2010.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. “The Poetry of the Lord’s Prayer: A Study in Poetic Device.” Journal of Biblical Literature 134 (2015): 347–372.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. “Progymnastic Topic Lists: A Compositional Template for Luke and Other Bioi?” New Testament Studies 54 (2008): 18–41.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Nash, Bryan. “Philippians 2:6–11 as Subversive Hymnos: A Study in Light of Ancient Rhetorical Theory.” Journal of Theological Studies 66 (2015): 90–138.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “Choosing What Is Advantageous: The Relationship between Epideictic and Deliberative Syncrisis in Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 58 (2012): 379–400.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael, and Whitlark, Jason. “The Encomiastic Topics of Syncrisis as the Key to the Structure and Argument of Hebrews.” New Testament Studies 57 (2011): 415–439.Google Scholar
Martin, Troy W., ed. Genealogies of New Testament Rhetorical Criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014.Google Scholar
Martin, Troy W., ed. “Invention and Arrangement in Recent Pauline Studies: A Survey of the Practices and the Problems.” Pages 48–118 in Paul and the Ancient Letter Form. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Adams, Sean A.. Pauline Studies 6. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Mason, Eric F. “You Are a Priest Forever”: Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 74. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Meier, J. P. “Symmetry and Theology in the Old Testament Citations in Heb 1,5–14.” Biblica 66 (1985): 504–533.Google Scholar
Michel, Otto. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Übersetzt und erklärt. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 12. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1966.Google Scholar
Moffatt, James. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Hebrews. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1979.Google Scholar
Moffitt, David M. Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 141. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Moffitt, David M. “But We Do See Abel: Hebrews and the Depiction of Abel’s Sacrifice in Some Mosaics of Ravenna.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar
Murphy, James Jerome. Rhetorical Theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Murphy-O’Connor, Jerome. Paul the Letter Writer: His World, His Options, His Skills. Good News Studies 41. Collegeville: Michael Glazier, 1995.Google Scholar
Nauck, Wolfgang. “Zum Aufbau des Hebräerbriefes.” Pages 199–206 in Judentum, Urchristentum, Kirche, Festschrift für Joachim Jeremias. Edited by Eltester, Walter. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 26. Berlin: Alfred Töpelmann, 1960.Google Scholar
Neeley, Linda L. “A Discourse Analysis of Hebrews.” Occasional Papers in Translation and Textlinguistics 3–4 (1987): 1–146.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. “Encomion Versus Vituperation: Contrasting Portraits of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel.” Journal of Biblical Literature 126 (2007): 529–552.Google Scholar
Nissilä, Keijo. Das Hohepriestermotiv im Hebräerbrief: Eine Exegetische Untersuchung. Schriften der Finnischen Exegetischen Gesellschaft 33. Helsinki: Oy Liiton Kirjapaino, 1979.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Peter. The Letter to the Hebrews. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Olbricht, Thomas H. “Anticipating and Presenting the Case for Christ as High Priest in Hebrews.” Pages 355–372 in Rhetorical Argumentation in Biblical Texts: Essays from the Lund 2000 Conference. Edited by Eriksson, Anders, Olbricht, Thomas H., and Übelacker, Walter. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 8. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 2002.Google Scholar
Olbricht, Thomas H. “Hebrews as Amplification.” Pages 375–387 in Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Olbricht, Thomas H.. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 90. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. “The Ruler Power: A Study of the Roman Empire in the Second Century after Christ through the Roman Oration of Aelius Aristides.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43/4 (1953): 871–1003.Google Scholar
Pelling, Christopher. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. London: Duckworth, 2002.Google Scholar
Perlman, S. “The Historical Example, Its Use and Importance as Political Propaganda in the Attic Orators.” Pages 150–166 in Studies in History. Edited by Fuks, Alexander and Halpern, Israel. Scripta Hierosolymitana 7. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1961.Google Scholar
Perry, Peter S. The Rhetoric of Digressions: Revelation 7:1–17 and 10:1–11:13 and Ancient Communication. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/268. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Peterson, David. Hebrews and Perfection: An Examination of the Concept of Perfection in the ‘Epistle to the Hebrews.’ Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Pierce, Madison N. “Intra-Divine Discourse and the New Covenant in Hebrews: Subtext(s) in Hebrews 8–10.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of SBL, San Antonio, TX, 21 November 2016.Google Scholar
Rissi, Mathias. Die Theologie des Hebräerbriefs: Ihre Verankerung in der Situation des Verfassers und seiner Leser. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 41. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1987.Google Scholar
Robertson, John C. The Gorgianic Figures in Early Greek Prose. Baltimore: Friedenwald, 1893.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Clare K. Hebrews as Pseudepigraphon: The History and Significance of the Pauline Attribution of Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/235. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. “On Reading Plutarch’s Lives.” Pages 73–98 in Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Edited by Scardigli, B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sanders, Jack T. The New Testament Christological Hymns: Their Historical Religious Background. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 15. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1971.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip, ed. A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. 14 vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1889.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “A Celebration of the Enthroned Son: The Catena of Hebrews 1.” Journal of Biblical Literature 120 (2001): 469–485.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. Cosmology and Eschatology in Hebrews: The Settings of Sacrifice. Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “Keeping His Appointment: Creation and Enthronement in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 66 (1997): 91–117.Google Scholar
Schenck, Kenneth L. “The Worship of Jesus among Early Christians: The Evidence from Hebrews.” Pages 114–126 in Jesus and Paul: Global Perspectives in Honor of James D. G. Dunn on His 70th Birthday. Edited by Oropeza, B. J., Robertson, C. K., and Mohrmann, Douglas C.. The Library of New Testament Studies 414. London: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar
Schnelle, Udo. “Das frühe Christentum und die Bildung.” New Testament Studies 61 (2015): 113–143.Google Scholar
Schunack, Gerd. Der Hebräerbrief. Zürcher Bibelkommentare Neuen Testament 14. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2002.Google Scholar
Seid, Timothy W. “Synkrisis in Hebrews 7: Rhetorical Structure and Analysis.” Pages 322–347 in The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture: Essays from the 1996 Malibu Conference. Edited by Porter, Stanley E. and Stamps, Dennis L.. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Siegert, Folker. “Homily and Panegyrical Sermon.” Pages 421–443 in Handbook of Classic Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Sheerin, Daniel. “Rhetorical and Hermeneutic Synkrisis in Patristic Typology.” Pages 22–39 in Nova & Vetera Patristic Studies in Honor of Thomas Patrick Halton. Edited by Petruccione, John. Washington D. C.: Catholic University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Small, Brian C. The Characterization of Jesus in the Book of Hebrews. Biblical Interpretation Series 128. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” American Journal of Philology 62 (1941): 35–50, 169–190.Google Scholar
Son, Kiwoong. Zion Symbolism in Hebrews: Hebrews 12:18–24 as a Hermeneutical Key to the Epistle. Paternoster Biblical Monographs. Milton Keys: Paternoster, 2005.Google Scholar
Spicq, Ceslas. L’Épître aux Hébreux. 2 vols. Echter Bibel. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1952-1953.Google Scholar
Standaert, Benoît. L’évangile selon Marc: Composition et genre littéraire. Nijmegen: Stichting Studentenpers, 1978.Google Scholar
Stanley, Steve. “The Structure of Hebrews from Three Perspectives.” Tyndale Bulletin 45 (1994): 245–71.Google Scholar
Steel, Catherine. “Divisions of Speech.” Pages 77–91 in A Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Edited by Gunderson, Erik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stegemann, Ekkehard W., and Stegemann, Wolfgang. “Hebrews and the Discourse of Judeophobia.” Pages 357–69 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Stegner, William Richard. “The Ancient Jewish Synagogue Homily.” Pages 51–69 in Greco-Roman Literature and the New Testament. Edited by Aune, David E.. Society of Biblical Literature Sources for Biblical Study 21. Atlanta: Scholars, 1988.Google Scholar
Stermberger, Günter. “Response.” Pages 45–48 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Stermberger, Günter. “The Derashah in Rabbinic Times.” Pages 7–21 Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. From Prophecy to Preaching: A Survey for the Origins of the Christian Homily. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 59. Leiden: Brill, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Sykes, Alistair. The Lamb’s High Feast: Melito, Peri Pascha and the Quartodeciman Paschal Liturgy at Sardis. Vigiliae Christianae Supplements 42. Leiden: Brill, 1998.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jesper. “Stumbling Block or Stepping Stone? On the Reception History of Hebrews 8:13.” Pages 316–342 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Gelardini, Gabriella and Attridge, Harold W.. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Swetnam, James. Jesus and Isaac: A Study of the Epistle to the Hebrews in the Light of the Aqedah. Analecta Biblica 94. Rome: Biblical Institute, 1981.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Reading Corinthians: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Rev. ed. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys, 2002.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. Reading John: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles. Rev. ed. Macon: Smyth & Helwys, 2005.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H. “The Way of the Lukan Jesus: Dimensions of Lukan Spirituality.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 9 (1982): 237–49.Google Scholar
Talbert, Charles H., and Whitlark, Jason. Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Thiessen, Matthew. “Hebrews 12.5–13, the Wilderness Period, and Israel’s Discipline.” New Testament Studies 55 (2009): 366–379.Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. “Argument and Persuasion in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” Perspectives in Religious Studies 39 (2012): 361–377.Google Scholar
Thompson, James W. The Beginnings of Christian Philosophy: The Epistle to the Hebrews. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 13. Washington D.C.: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1982.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri. “The General New Testament Writings.” Pages 587–607 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period, 330 B.C.–A.D. 400. Edited by Porter, Stanley. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Thyen, Hartwig. Der Stil der jüdisch-hellenistischen Homilie. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1955.Google Scholar
Übelacker, Walter G. Der Hebräerbrief als Appell: Untersuchungen zu exordium, narratio, und postscriptum (Hebr 1–2 und 13, 22–25). Coniectanea Biblica: New Testament Series 21. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1989.Google Scholar
Übelacker, Walter G. “Hebrews and the Implied Author’s Rhetorical Ethos.” Pages 316–334 in Rhetoric, Ethic, and Moral Persuasion in Biblical Discourse: Essays from the 2002 Heidelberg Conference. Edited by Olbricht, Thomas H. and Eriksson, Anders. Emory Studies in Early Christianity 11. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Usher, Stephen. “Symbouleutic Oratory.” Pages 220–235 in A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Edited by Worthington, Ian. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Malden: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Vaganay, Leon. “La plan de l’Épître aux Hébreux.” Pages 269–277 in Memorial Lagrange. Edited by Vincent, L.-H.. Paris: J. Gabalda, 1940.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. A Structured Translation of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Translated by Swetnam, James. Biblica, Subsidia 12. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1964.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épître aux Hébreux. 2nd ed. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1976.Google Scholar
Vanhoye, Albert. La Structure littéraire de l’Épitre aux Hébreux. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1963.Google Scholar
Visotzky, Burton L. “Midrash, Christian Exegesis and the Hellenistic Hermeneutic.” Pages 111–131 in Current Trends in the Study of Midrash. Edited by Bakhos, C.. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 106. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
von Soden, Hermann. Hebräerbrief, Briefe des Petrus, Jakobus, Judas. Hand-Commentar zum neuen Testament 3. Tubingen: Mohr, 1899.Google Scholar
von Stockhausen, Annette. “Christian Perception of Jewish Preaching in Early Christianity?” Pages 49–70 in Preaching in Judaism and Early Christianity: Encounters and Developments from Biblical Times to Modernity. Edited by Deeg, Alexander, Homolka, Walter, and Schöttler, Heinz-Günther. Studia Judaica 41. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, A. J. M. “The ‘Letter’ to the Hebrews and Its Thirteenth Chapter.” New Testament Studies 50 (2004): 390–405.Google Scholar
Weiss, Hans-Friedrich. Der Brief an die Hebräer. Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar über das Neue Testament 15. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991.Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia L. A Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: The Relationship between Form and Meaning. The Library of New Testament Studies 297. London: T&T Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Whitfield, Bryan J. Joshua Traditions and the Argument of Hebrews 3 and 4. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 194. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “Cosmology and the Perfection of Humanity in Hebrews.” Pages 117–130 in Interpretation and the Claims of the Text: Resourcing New Testament Theology. Edited by Whitlark, Jason A., Longenecker, Bruce W., Novakovic, Lidija, and Parsons, Mikeal C.. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. Enabling Fidelity to God: Perseverance in Hebrews in Light of the Reciprocity Systems of the Ancient Mediterranean World. Paternoster Biblical Mongraphs. Milton Keyes: Paternoster Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “Fidelity and New Covenant Enablement in Hebrews.” Pages 72–91 in Talbert, Charles H. and Whitlark, Jason A., Getting “Saved”: The Whole Story of Salvation in the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “The God of Peace and His Victorious King: Hebrews 13:20–21 and Its Roman Imperial Context.” Pages 155–178 in Hebrews in Contexts. Edited by Attridge, Harold W. and Gelardini, Gabriella. Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity 91. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. Resisting Empire: Rethinking the Purpose of the Letter to “the Hebrews.” The Library of New Testament Studies 484. London: T&T Clark, 2014.Google Scholar
Whitlark, Jason A. “The Warning against Idolatry: An Intertextual Examination of Septuagintal Warnings in Hebrews.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 34 (2012): 382–401.Google Scholar
Wills, Lawrence. “The Form of the Sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity.” Harvard Theological Review 77 (1984): 277–283.Google Scholar
Windisch, Hans. Der Hebräerbrief: Handbuch zum Neuen Testament. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1931.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. Letters and Homilies for Jewish Christians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James, and Jude. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben. The Indelible Image: The Theological and Ethical Thought World of the New Testament, Vol. 2: The Collective Witness. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Wuellner, Wilhelm. “Arrangement.” Pages 51–87 in Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period (330 B.C.–A.D. 400). Edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Heinrich. Das Bekenntnis der Hoffnung: Tradition und Redaktion im Hebräerbrief. Boner biblische Beiträge. Koeln: Peter Hanstein Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Zoido, Juan Carlos Iglesias. “The Battle Exhortation in Ancient Rhetoric.” Rhetorica 25 (2007): 141–158.Google Scholar