Abercrombie, D. (1965). Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adami, E. and Ramos Pinto, S. (2020). Meaning-(re)making in a world of untranslated signs: Towards a research agenda on multimodality, culture, and translation. In Boria, M., Carreres, Á., Noriega-Sánchez, M. and Tomalin, M. (eds.), Translation and Multimodality: Beyond Words. London: Routledge, 71–93.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, J. (2016). Lost in translation? Linguistic diversity and the elusive quest for plain meaning in the law. In Cheng, L., Sin, K. K. and Wagner, A. (eds.), The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation. London: Routledge, 43–55.Google Scholar

Alves, F. and Lykke Jakobsen, A. (2022). The translation process. In Malmkjær (ed.), 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alves, F., Pagano, A. and da Silva, I. (2010). A new window on translators’ cognitive activity: Methodological issues in the combined use of eye tracking, key logging and retrospective protocols. In Mees, I. M., Alves, F. and Göpferich, S. (eds.), Methodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research: A Tribute to Arnt Lykke Jakobsen. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 267–291.Google Scholar

Alves, F., Szpak, K. S. and Buchweitz, A. (2019). Translation in the brain: Preliminary thoughts about brain-imaging study to investigate psychological processes involved in translation. In Li, D., Lei, V. L. C. and He, Y. (eds.), Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Anderman, G. and Rogers, M. (2008). Incorporating Corpora: The Linguist and the Translator. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Angelone, E., Ehrensberger-Dow, M. and Massey, G. (eds.) (2020). The Bloomsbury Companion to Language Industry Studies. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselmi, S. (2018). Self-translators’ rewriting in freedom: New insights from product-based translation studies. Testo e Senso 19, 1–16.Google Scholar

Arthern, P. (1983). Judging the quality of revision. Lebende Sprachen 2, 53–57.Google Scholar

Arturo, P. (2015). Legal-linguistics for the United Nations, states and other non-state actors. ProZ.com Translation Article Knowledgebase. www.proz.com/doc/4090 (accessed 11 November 2024).Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, C. (2010). Bilingualism and multilingualism. In Malmkjær, K. (ed.), The Routledge Linguistics Encyclopedia, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 51–60.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (1993). Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. In Baker, M., Francis, G. and Tognini-Bonelli, E. (eds), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, M. (1997). Corpus-based translation studies: The challenges that lie ahead. In Somers, H. (ed.), Terminology, LSP and Translation: Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Juan C. Sager. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 175–186.Google Scholar

Balmer, J. (2013). Piecing Together the Fragments: Translating Classical Verse, Creating Contemporary Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, N. (1983). The Innocent Anthropologist: Notes from a Mud Hut. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, S. and Cornellà-Detrell, J. (eds.). (2019). Translation and Global Spaces of Power. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

BBC Good Food (nd). Recipe for pancakes. www.bbcgoodfood.com/recipes/easy-pancakes (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Beeching, K. (2011). The translation equivalence of bon, enfin, well and I mean. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 2(xvi), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrens, B. (2022). Translated text. In Malmkjær (ed.), 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, R. T. (1991). Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Berger, P. L. and Luckman, T. (1976). The Social Construction of Reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bernardini, S. (2000). Competence, Capacity, Corpora: A Study in Corpus-Aided Language Learning. Bologna: Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna.Google Scholar

Bernardini, S. (2001). Think-aloud protocols in translation research: Achievements, limits, future prospects. Target 13(2), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, R. (ed.), Cognition and Language Development. New York: Wiley & Sons, 279–362. Reprinted in Sanz, Laka and Tannenhaus (eds.) (2013), 1–80.Google Scholar

Biel, Ł. (2014/2016). Phraseology in legal translation: A corpus-based analysis of textual mapping in EU law. In Cheng, L., Sin, K. K. and Wagner, A. (eds.), The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation. London: Routledge. First published in 2014 by Ashgate Publishing, 177–192.Google Scholar

Biel, Ł. (2022). Translating legal texts. In Malmkjær, K. (ed.), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birch, D. (1988). Expanding semantic options for reading Early Modern English, in Birch, D. and O’Toole, M. (eds.), Functions of Style. London: Pinter Publishers, 157–168.Google Scholar

Bisiada, M. (2018). The editor’s invisibility: Analysing editorial intervention in translation. Target 30(2), 288–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blixen, K. (1935). Syv Fantastiske Fortællinger. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. (1986). Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation. In House, J. and Blum-Kulka, S. (eds.), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 17–35.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. and Levenston, E. A. (1978/1983). Universals of lexical simplification. In Færch, C. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman, 119–139. Revised version of an article originally published in Language Learning 28: 399–425, 1978.Google Scholar

Boase-Beier, J. (2006). Stylistic Approaches to Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Boase-Beier, J. (2020). Translation and Style, 2nd ed. London: Routledge (1st ed. 2006).Google Scholar

Boase-Beier, J. and de Vooght, M. (eds.) (2019). Poetry of the Holocaust: An Anthology. Todmorden: Arc Publications.Google Scholar

Bowker, L. (2020). Terminology management. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowker, L. and Ciro, J. B. (2019). Machine Translation and Global Research. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Briggs, K. (2017). This Little Art. London: Fitzcarraldo Editions.Google Scholar

Brodie, G. (2022). Translating for the theatre. In Malmkjær (ed.), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bucciarelli, M. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2019). Deontics, meaning, reasoning, and emotion. Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica XLIX(1), 89–112.Google Scholar

Byrne, J. (2010). Technical Translation: Usability Strategies for Translating Technical Documentation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Cao, D. (2007). Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, G. (2010). Bible: The Story of the King James Version 1611–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carl, M. (2012). Translog-II: A program for recording user activity data for empirical translation process research, International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Applications 3(1), 153–162.Google Scholar

Carl, M. and Planas, E. (2020). Advances in interactive translation technology. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carl, M., Bangalore, S. and Schaeffer, M. (eds.) (2016). New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carl, M., Schaeffer, M. and Bangalore, S. (2016). The CRITT Translation Process Research Database. In Carl, Bangalore and Schaeffer (eds.), 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, M. and Ivarsson, J. (1998). Code of Good Subtitling Practice. Berlin: European Association for Studies in Screen Translation. www.esist.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Code-of-Good-Subtitling-Practice.PDF.pdf (accessed 24 November 2024).Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, A. F. (1978/1999). What Is This Thing Called Science? Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Chan, S.-W. (2013). Approaching localization. In Millan, C. and Bartrina, F. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL) (nd). Professional Code of Conduct. www.ciol.org.uk/code (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

Chen, C. W.and Renteln, A. D. (2022). International Human Rights: A Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choi, J. (2021). What happened to heaven and Buddha? James Scarth Gale’s translation stylistics. Acta Koreana 24(2), 1–30.Google Scholar

Choi, J. (2022). Government Translation in South Korea: A Corpus-Based Study. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicero, M. (46 BCE). Libellus de optimo genere oratorum ‘On the Best Kind of Orators’.Google Scholar

Cirillo, L. and Niemants, N. (2017). Teaching Dialogue Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conboy, M. (2007). The Language of the News. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Constantine, D. (2011). Service abroad: Hölderlin, poet-translator: A lecture. Translation and Literature 20(1), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, V. (2004). The English Writing System. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Cordingly, A. (ed.). (2013). Self-Translation: Brokering Originality in Hybrid Culture. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Cornbleet, S. and Carter, R. (2001). The Language of Speech and Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Coulthard, R. M. (2002). Forensic linguistics. In Malmkjær, K. (ed.), The Linguistics Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 139–143 (1st ed. 1991).Google Scholar

Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S. and Dascalu, M. (2019). Moving beyond classic readability formulas: New methods and new models. Journal of Research in Reading 42(3–4), 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Dagut, M. B. (1971). A Linguistic Analysis of Some Semantic Problems of Hebrew–English Translation. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Daems, J., Vandepitte, S., Hartsuiker, R. J. and Macken, L. (2017). Translation methods and experience: A comparative analysis of human translation and post-editing with students and professional translators. Meta 62(2): 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davenport, C. (2018). Google Translate processes 143 billion words every day. Android Police, 9 October 2018. www.androidpolice.com/2018/10/09/google-translate-processes-143-billion-words-every-day/ (accessed 24 February 2023).Google Scholar

Davies, P. (2018). Witness between Languages: The Translation of Holocaust Testimonies in Context. Rochester, NY: Camden House Publishing.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. C. (2017). From Bacterias to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Desjardins, R. (2017). Translation and Social Media: In Theory, in Training and in Professional Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desjardins, R., Larsonneur, C. and Lacour, P. (2021). Introduction. In Desjardins, R., Larsonneur, C. and Lacour, P. (eds.), When Translation Goes Digital: Case Studies and Critical Reflections. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díaz Cintas, J. and Remael, A. (2007). Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Dinesen, I. (Karen Blixen). (1934). Seven Gothic Tales. London: Random House.Google Scholar

DK-Kogebogen (nd). Recipe for pancakes. www.dk-kogebogen.dk/opskrifter/31044/pandekager-gammeldags (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Do Carmo, F. (2021). Editing actions: A missing link between translation process research and machine translation research. In Carl, M. (ed.), Explorations in Empirical Translation Process Research. Cham: Springer, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollerup, C. (2000). ‘Relay’ and ‘support’ translations. In Chesterman, A., Gallardo San Salvador, N. and Gambier, Y. (eds.), Translation in Context: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Granada 1998. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drugan, J. (2013). Quality in Professional Translation: Assessment and Improvement. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Dudley-Evans, T. (1987). Introduction. ELR Journal 1(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Dulcken, H. W. (1864). Hans Christian Andersen’s Stories for the Household. Stories and Tales. London: Routledge. Reissued as The Complete Illustrated Works of Hans Christian Andersen (London: Chancellor Press) in 1983, reprinted 1994.Google Scholar

d’Ydewalle, G. and De Bruycker, W. (2007). Eye movements of children and adults while reading television subtitles. European Psychologist 12(3), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engberg, J. (2020). Comparative law for legal translation: Through multiple perspectives to multidimensional knowledge. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Review international de Sémiotique juridique. Online first version at https://pierre-legrand.com/ewExternalFiles/Engberg.pdf (accessed 11 January 2023).Google Scholar

Erdmann, B. and Dodge, R. (1898). Psychologische Untersuchung über das Lesen auf experimenteller Grundlage. Niemeyer: Halle.Google Scholar

Erkazanci-Durmuş, H. (2011). A critical sociolinguistic approach to translating marginal voices. In Federici, F. M. (ed.), Translating Dialects and Languages of Minorities: Challenges and Solutions. Oxford: Peter Lang, 21–30.Google Scholar

Euclid (c. 300 bce). The Elements (Greek: Στοιχεῖα Stoikheîa).Google Scholar

European Commission Directorate-General (nd).Translation. https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/translation_en) (accessed 07 June 2024).Google Scholar

European Union Publications Office (2023). Translation in Figures 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/86b29f2e-bc97-11ed-8912-01aa75ed71a1; accessed 20 November 2024.Google Scholar

Farrell, M. (2018). Machine translation markers in post-edited machine translation output. In Proceedings of the 40th Conference Translating and the Computer. London: AsLing, 50–59.Google Scholar

Fillmore, C. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In Zampolli, A. (ed.), Linguistic Structure Processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, 55–81.Google Scholar

Firth, J. R. (1957). Modes of meaning. In Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischbach, H. (ed.) (1998). Translation and Medicine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G. and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fraser, J. (1996). The translator investigated. The Translator 2(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujii, A. (1988). News translation in Japan. Meta 33(1), 32–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagnon, D. (2015). Self-translation. Literary creativity, and trans-lingual aesthetics: A Québec writer’s perspective. Linguaculture 1, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gale, J. G. (trans.) (1913). Korean Folk Tales: Imps, Ghosts and Fairies. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar

Gale, J. G. (1915). The Life of the Buddha. Unpublished manuscript held at the University of Toronto.Google Scholar

García, A. M. (2019). The Neurocognition of Translation and Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghassempur, S. (2011). Fuckin’ Hell! Dublin soul goes German: A functional approach to the translation of ‘fuck’ in Roddy Doyle’s The Commitments. In Federici, F. M. (ed.), Translating Dialects and Languages of Minorities: Challenges and Solutions. Oxford: Peter Lang, 49–64.Google Scholar

Giroud, V. (2010). Translation. In Suarez, M. F. and Woudhuysen, H. R. (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Book, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1215–1217.Google Scholar

Giusti, G. (1873). Proverbi toscani. Rome: Spese dell’ editore.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, H. (2004). Screen Translation: Seven Studies in Subtitling, Dubbing and Voice-Over. Copenhagen: Centre for Translation Studies, Department of English, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Gough, J., Temizöz, Ö., Hieke, G. and Zilio, L. (2023). Concurrent translation on collaborative platforms. Translation Spaces 12(1), 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graham, J. D. (1983). Checking, revision and editing. In Picken, C. (ed.), The Translator’s Handbook. London: Aslib, 99–105.Google Scholar

Grainger, S., Lerot, J. and Petch-Tyson, S. (2003). Corpus-Based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: RodopiCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimes, J. E. (1975). The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Guardian (2022). Google fires software engineer who claims AI chatbot is sentient. The Guardian, 23 July 2023. www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jul/23/google-fires-software-engineer-who-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

Guerberof Arenas, A. G. (2020). Pre-editing and post-editing. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 333–360.Google Scholar

Gutt, E.-A. (1991). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hahn, D. (2022). Catching Fire: A Translation Diary. Edinburgh: Charco Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3), 241–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. (1989). Spoken and Written Language, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1st ed. 1985).Google Scholar

Halliday, M., McIntosh, A. and Strevens, P. (1964). The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Halimi, S. A. (2017). Contextualizing translation decisions in legal system-bound and international multilingual contexts: French–Arabic criminal justice terminology. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 3(1), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansen, G. (1999). Das kritische Bewust-sein beim Übersetzen: Eine Analyse der Übersetzungsprozesses mit Hilfe von Translog und Retrospektion. In Hansen, G. (ed.), Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 43–67.Google Scholar

Hansen, M.-B. M. (2005). A comparative study of the semantics and pragmatics of enfin and finalement, in synchrony and diachrony. Journal of French Studies 15, 153–171.Google Scholar

Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S. and Steiner, E. (2012). Cross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, B. (2011). ¡Cuéntame cómo pasó! – a memoir of machine translation in Montreal circa 1970. In Blasco Mayor, M. and Jimenez Ivars, M. (eds.), Interpreting Naturally: A Tribute to Brian Harris. Bern: Peter Lang, 11–32.Google Scholar

Hasselgård, H. and Oksefjell, S. (1999). Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henkel, D. and Lacour, P. (2021). Collaboration strategies in multilingual online literary translation. In Desjardins, R., Larsonneur, C. and Lacour, P. (eds.), When Translation Goes Digital: Case Studies and Critical Reflections. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennecke, I. (2017). The impact of pragmatic markers and hedging on sentence comprehension: A case study of comme and genre. Journal of French Studies 27, 355–380.Google Scholar

Hinchliffe, I., Oliver, T. and Schwartz, R. (eds. and compilers) (2014). 101 Things a Translator Needs to Know. WLF Think Tank. United Kingdom: WFL 101 Publishing.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, J. C. F. (1804). Die Trauerspiele des Sophokles. Frankfurt am Main: F. Wilmans.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1972/1988). The name and nature of translation studies. In Translated! Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi: 67–80. This is an expanded version of a paper presented in the Translation Section of the Third International Congress on Applied Linguistics held in Copenhagen, 21–26 August 1972.Google Scholar

Horace (c. 19 BCE). Ars Poetica (The Art of Poetry).Google Scholar

House, J. (2016). Translation and Communication Across Cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Howes, D. H. and Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41(6), 401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hubscher-Davidson, S. (2018). Translation and Emotion: A Psychological Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes 13(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Institute of Translation and Interpreting (ITI) (nd). www.iti.org.uk (accessed 7 June 2024).Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2015). ISO 17100:2015 (E) Translation Services – Requirements for Translation Services. www.iso.org/standard/59149.html (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jääskeläinen, R. (2002). Think-aloud protocol studies into translation: An annotated bibliography. Target 14(1), 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jääskeläinen, R. (2020). Verbal reports. In Schwieter, J. W. and Ferreira, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 213–231.Google Scholar

Jacquemond, R. (1992). Translation and cultural hegemony: The case of French-Arabic translation. In Venuti, L. (ed.), Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London: Routledge, 139–158.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (1998). Logging time delay in translation. In Hansen, G. (ed.), LSP Texts and the Process in Translation. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, 73–101.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (1999). Logging target text production with Translog. In Hansen, G. (ed.), Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 9–20.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (2016). Foreword. In Carl, Bangalore and Schaeffer (eds.), 13–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (2017). Translation process research. In Schwieter, J. W and Ferreira, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 21–49.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (2019a). Moving translation, revision, and post-editing boundaries. In Dam, H. V., Nesbett Brøgger, M. and Zethsen, K. K. (eds.), Moving Boundaries in Translation Studies. London: Routledge, 64–80.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. (2019b). Segmentation in translation: A look at expert behaviour. In Li, D. V., Lei, D. V. L. and He, Y. (eds.) Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation. Singapore: Springer, 71–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. and Jensen, K. T. H. (2008). Eye movement behaviour across four different types of reading task. In Göpferich, S., Jakobsen, A.L. and Mees, I.M.  (eds.), Looking at Eyes: Eye Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 103–124.Google Scholar

Jakobsen, A. L. and Schou, L. (1999). Translog documentation. In Hansen, G. (ed.), Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School, Appendix.Google Scholar

Javal, E. (1878). Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annales d’ocullistique 80, 61–73.Google Scholar

Jones, F. R. (1989). On aboriginal sufferance: A process model of poetic translating. Target 1(2), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, F. R. (2001). Bringing Mak Dizdar into the mainstream: Textual and cultural issues in translating Dizdar’s Kameni spavač. Forum Bosnae 11, 261–285.Google Scholar

Jones, H. (2019). Wikipedia as a translation zone: A heterotopic analysis of the online encyclopedia and its collaborative volunteer translator community. Target 31(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juel, C. and Solso, R. L. (1981). The role of orthographic redundancy, versatility and spelling-sound correspondences in word identification. In Kamil, M. L. (ed.), Directions in Reading: Research and Instruction. Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference, 74–82.Google Scholar

Jung, V. (2002). English–German Self-Translation of Academic Texts and Its Relevance for Translation Theory and Practice. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Just, M. A. and Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 87(4), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kenny, D. (2001). Lexis and Creativity in Translation: A Corpus-Based Study. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. (2022). Machine Translation for Everyone: Empowering Users in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Kingscott, G. (2002). Technical translation and related disciplines. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology. 10(4), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koskinen, K. (2008). Translating Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Krings, H. P. (1986). Was in den Köpfen von Übersetzern vorgeht: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Struktur des Übersetzungsprozesses an fortgeschrittenen Französisschlernern. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar

Krings, H. P. (2001). Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar

Krouwer, M. (1981). Verfangen (Involvement). Orbis: The International Literary Magazine 41, 15.Google Scholar

Künzli, A. (2007). Translation revision: A study of the performance of ten professional translators revising a legal text. In Gambier, Y., Shlesinger, M. and Stolze, R. (eds.), Doubts and Directions in Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labinaz, P. and Sbisà, M. (2014). Certainty and uncertainty in assertive speech acts. In Zuczkowski, A., Bongelli, R., Riccioni, I. and Canestrari, C. (eds.), Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laviosa, S. (2002). Corpus-Based Translation Studies: Theory, Findings, Application. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality on social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations 1(1), 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, C. and Thompson, S. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Wei. (2006). Bilingualism. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1–12.Google Scholar

Li, Wenjie. (2017). The Chinese Versions of Hans Christian Andersen’s Tales: A History of Translation and Interpretation. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar

Liu, H. (2020). Foreword. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), viii–xi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Y., Zheng, B. and Zhou, H. (2019). Measuring the difficulty of text translation: The combination of text-focused and translator-oriented approaches. Target 31(1), 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lörscher, W. (1986). Linguistic aspects of the translation process: Towards an analysis of translation performance. In House, J. and Bloom-Kulka, S. (eds.), Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 277–292.Google Scholar

Lu, F. and Yuan, Z. (2019). Explore the brain activity during translation and interpreting using functional near-infrared spectroscopy’. In Li, D., Lei, V. C. L. and He, Y. (eds.), Researching Cognitive Processes of Translation. Singapore: Springer, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucy, M. (2018). The measure of a metre. Cosmos, April 6 2018. https://cosmosmagazine.com/people/society/the-measure-of-a-metre/ (accessed 11 November 2024).Google Scholar

Luther, M. (1530). Sendbrief vom Dolmetschen. Nürnberg: Georg Rottmaier.Google Scholar

McDonough, J. (2007). How do language professionals organize themselves? An overview of translation networks. Meta 52(4), 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDonough Dolmaya, J. (2011). The ethics of crowdsourcing. Linguistica Antverpiensia 10, 97–110.Google Scholar

McDonough Dolmaya, J. (2022). Translator associations and networks. In Malmkjær (ed.), 198–213.Google Scholar

McDonough Dolmaya, J. and Sánchez Ramos, M. del M. (2019). Characterizing online social translation. Translation Studies 12(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T. and Wilson, A. (1996). Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2nd ed. 2001).Google Scholar

McEnery, T., Xiao, R. and Tono, Y. (2006). Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Research Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McKay, C. (2006). How to Succeed as a Freelance Translator. Colorado: Two Rats Press.Google Scholar

Macpherson, J. (1765). The Works of Ossian, the son of Fingal, in two volumes. Translated from the Galic language by James Macpherson. The Third Edition. To which is subjoined a critical dissertation on the poems of Ossian. By Hugh Blair, D.D. London: T. Becket and P. A. De Hondt.Google Scholar

Maginot, C. (2018). Is there a future in freelance translation? Let’s talk about it. The ATA Chronicle 31(May/June). www.atanet.org/business-strategies/is-there-a-future-in-freelance-translation/ (accessed 11 November 2024).Google Scholar

Maher, B. (2011). Recreation and Style: Translating Humorous Literature in Italian and English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (1998). Love thy neighbor: Will parallel corpora endear linguists to translators? Meta 43(4), 534–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2003). What happened to God and the angels: An exercise in translational stylistics. Target 15(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2004). Translational stylistics. Language and Literature 13(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2011). Translation universals. In Malmkjær, K. and Windle, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Translation Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2014). What happened to God and the angels: An exercise in translational stylistics. Special Issue of Journal of the Association of North-East Asian Cultures 40(9), 63–86.Google Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (2020). Translation and Creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Malmkjær, K. (ed.) (2022). The Cambridge Handbook of Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marling, W. (2020). What does the gatekeeper do? In Guerrero, G., Loy, B. and Müller, G. (eds.), World Editors: Dynamics of Global Publishing and the Latin American Case between the Archive and the Digital Age. Berlin: De Gruyter, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsushita, K. (2019). When News Travels East: Translation Practices by Japanese Newspapers. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar

Mattila, H. E. S. (2016). Foreword: New challenges for legal translation. In Cheng, L., Sin, K. K. and Wagner, A. (eds.), The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation. London: Routledge, xix–xxi.Google Scholar

Melby, A. K. (2020). Future of machine translation: Musings on Weaver’s memo. In O’Hagan, M. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology, London: Routledge, 419–436.Google Scholar

Mellinger, C. D. (2018). Re-thinking translation quality: Revision in the digital age. Target 30(2), 310–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mellinger, C. D. and Hanson, T. (2017). Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Merkle, D. (2022). Translation in the second millennium. In Malmkjær (ed.), 556–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesmer, H. A. (2005). Decodable text and the first grade reader. Reading and Writing Quarterly 21(1), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W. and Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning form the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly 74(3), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meylaerts, R. and Marais, K. (eds.) (2023). The Routledge Handbook of Translation Theory and Concepts. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitamura, T. and Nyberg, E. (2001). Automatic rewriting for controlled language translation. In Proceedings of the NLPRS2001 Workshop on Automatic Paraphrasing: Theories and Applications. ACM Digital Library.Google Scholar

Montalt Resurrecció, V. (2010). Medical translation and interpreting. In Gambier, Y. and van Doorslaer, L. (eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–82.Google Scholar

Montalt Resurrecció, V. and González-Davies, M. (2007/2014). Medical Translation Step by Step: Learning by Drafting. London: Routledge. First published in 2007 by St Jerome, Manchester.Google Scholar

Moore, F., Lowe, S. and Hwang, K.-S. (2007). Language, Power and Integration: The Translator as Gatekeeper in the Korean Business Community in London (UK). www.researchgate.net/publication/242080689_Language_Power_and_Integration_The_Translator_as_Gatekeeper_in_the_Korean_Business_Community_in_London_UK (accessed 6 January 2021).Google Scholar

Mossop, B. (2009). Positioning readers. In Dimitriu, R. and Shlesinger, M. (eds.), Translators and Their Readers. In Homage to Eugene A. Nida. Brussels: Les Éditions du Hasards, 235–251.Google Scholar

Mossop, B. (2014). Revising and Editing for Translators, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mounin, G. (1955). Les Belles Infidèles. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar

Mousten, B. (2008).Globalisation and Localisation Influences on Web Site Text Distribution: A Case Study of Text Travel between Two VELUX Web Sites. PhD, Copenhagen University.Google Scholar

Muñoz-Miquel, A. (2018). Differences between linguists and subject-matter experts in the medical translation practice. Target 30(1), 24–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nida, E. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nord, C. (1988/2005). Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi (2005). Translated into English by C. Nord and P. Sparrow from Textanalyse und Übersetzen: Theoretische Grundlagen, Methode und didaktische Anwendung einer übersetzungsrelevanten Textanalyse. Heidelberg: Gross (1988).Google Scholar

Nord, C. (2008). Defining translation functions: The translation brief as a guideline for the trainee translation. Ilha do Desterro. A Journal of English Language Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 41–55.Google Scholar

Nunberg, G. (1990). The Linguistics of Punctuation. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. and Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2014. Cognitive approaches to emotions. Trends in Cognitive Science 18(3): 134–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Brien, S. (2011). Introduction. In Cognitive Explorations of Translation. New York: Continuum, 1–15.Google Scholar

O’Brien, S. (2017). Machine translation and cognition. In Schwieter, J. W. and Ferreira, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 313–331.Google Scholar

Olohan, M. (2016). Scientific and Technical Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Olohan, M. and Baker, M. (2000). Reporting that in translated English: Evidence for subconscious processes of explicitation? Across Languages and Cultures 1(2): 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Opdag Jylland. (2018). 25 jyske attraktioner / 25 Jütland Attraktionen/ 25 Attractions in Jutland. Copenhagen: Visit Denmark.Google Scholar

Øverås, L. (1996). In Search of the Third Code: An Investigation of Norms in Literary Translation. Unpublished Cand. Philol. Thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar

Øverås, L. (1998). In search of the third code: An investigation of norms in literary translation. Meta 43(4), 571–588.Google Scholar

Park, R. (1922). The Immigrant Press and Its Control. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Perego, E., Del Missier, F. and Stragà, M. (2018). Dubbing vs. subtitling: Complexity matters. Target 30(1), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pérez-González, L. (2020). From the ‘Cinema of Attractions’ to Danmu: A multimodal-theory analysis of changing subtitling aesthetics across media cultures. In Boria, M., Carreres, Á., Noriega-Sánchez, M. and Tomalin, M. (eds.), Translation and Multimodality: Beyond Words. London: Routledge, 94–116.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. (1953). Some personal reflections on New Testament translation. The Bible Translator 4, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierini, P. (2009). Adjectives in tourism English on the web: A corpus-based study. Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación (CLAC) 40, 93–116.Google Scholar

Prieto Ramos, F. (2016). Parameters for problem-solving in legal translation: Implications for legal lexicography and institutional terminology management. In Cheng, L., Sin, K. K and Wagner, A. (eds.), The Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation. London: Routledge, 121–134.Google Scholar

Prieto Ramos, F. (2021). Legal and institutional translation: Functions, processes, competences. Target 33(2), 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pym, A. (2004). The Moving Text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pym, A. (2014). Translator associations: From gatekeepers to communities. Target 26(3), 466–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pym, A. (2015). Translating as risk management. Journal of Pragmatics 85, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pym, A. (2016). Risk analysis as a heuristic tool in the historiography of interpreters: For an understanding of worst practices. In Takeda, K. and Baigorri-Jalón, J. (eds.), New Insights in the History of Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pym, A. and Matsushita, K. (2018). Risk mitigation in translator decisions. Across Languages and Cultures 19(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quah, C. K. (2006). Translation and Technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reiss, K. (1971/2000). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übersetzungskritik. Munich: Max Hueber. Translation by Erroll F. Rhodes (2000) as Translation Criticism: The Potentials and Limitations. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Richards, D. B. (1979). Goethe’s Search for the Muse: Translation and Creativity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, J. T. E. (1975). The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 13(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Risku, H. and Dickinson, A. (2009). Translators as networkers: The role of virtual communities. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42(20), 49–70.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. (1997). Western Translation Theory: From Herodotus to Nietzsche. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Rodríguez de Céspedes, B. (2020). Beyond the margins of academic education: Identifying translation industry training practices through action research. The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research 12(1), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sager, J. (1990). A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sakamoto, A. (2022). Translation and technology. In Malmkjær (ed.), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salaga-Meyer, F. (1997). I think that perhaps you should: A study of hedges in written scientific discourse. In Miller, T. (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington: United States Information Agency.Google Scholar

Saldanha, G. and O’Brien, S. (2013). Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Sanz, M., Laka, I. and Tannenhaus, M. K. (eds.) (2013). Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Šarčević, S. (2006). Legal translation. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaeffer, M. (2022). Translation in the third millennium. In Malmkjær (ed.), 576–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaeffer, M., Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J. and Malmkjær, K. (2017). Reading for translation. In Jakobsen, A. L. and Mesa-Lao, B. (eds.), Translation in Transition: Between Cognition, Computing and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schäffner, C. (2020). Translators’ roles and responsibilities. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, L. (2018). The history and promise of machine translation. In Lacruz, I. (ed.), Innovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scruton, R. (1974/1988). The Aesthetic Attitude: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind. London: Methuen. Reprinted in 1988 St. Augustine’s Press, Indiana.Google Scholar

Selver, P. (1966). The Art of Translating Poetry. London: John Baker.Google Scholar

Setton, R. and Dawrant, A. (2016). Conference Interpreting: A Complete Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheppard, N. (1975). Alitjinya Ngura Tjukurtjarangka / Alitji in the Dreamtime (edited by B. Ker Wilson). Adelaide: The Department of Adult Education, The University of AdelaideGoogle Scholar

Sheppard, N. (1992). Alitji in Dreamland. East Roseville: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Shih, C. Y. (2006). Revision from translators’ point of view: An interview study. Target 18(2), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shih, C. Y. (2015). Problem-solving and decision-making in translation revision: Two case studies. Across Languages and Cultures 16(1), 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shih, C. Y. (2023). Navigating the Web: A Qualitative Eye Tracking-Based Study of Translators’ Web Search Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Elements in Translation and Interpreting].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shreve, G. M. (2020). Professional translator development from an expertise perspective. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, J. Jr. (1830). The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon, Upon Plates Taken from the Plates of Nephi, Palmyra. New York: E. B. Grandin.Google Scholar

Snell-Hornby, M. (1988; revised ed. 1995). Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sosoni, V., O’Shea, J. and Stasimioti, M. (2022). Translating law: A comparison of human and post-edited translations from Greek to English. Revista de Llengua i Dret / Journal of Language and Law 78, 92–120.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell (2nd ed. 1995).Google Scholar

Steiner, G. (1975/1992). After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Suojanen, T., Koskinen, K. and Tuominen, T. (2015). User-Centered Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. (1981/2011). Aspects of Article Introductions. Aston ESP Research Report No. 1. Birmingham: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston in Birmingham. Reissued 2011, Michigan University Press.Google Scholar

Swisher, V. (2020). The Five Phases of the Translation Workflow. Content Rules ebook. https://contentrules.com/creating-translation-workflow/.Google Scholar

Taibi, M. and Ozolins, U. (2016). Community Translation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Teich, E. (1999). System-oriented and text-oriented comparative linguistic research: Crosslinguistic variation in translation. Languages in Contrast 2(2), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tiku, N. (2022). The Google engineer who thinks the company’s AI has come to life. The Washington Post, 11 June 2022.Google Scholar

Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (2002). Translationese – a myth or an empirical fact? A study into the linguistic identifiability of translated language. Target 14(2), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toral, A. (2019). Post-editese: An exacerbated translationese. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVII: Research Track. Dublin: European Association for Machine Translation, 273–281.Google Scholar

Toury, G. (1976/1980). The nature and role of norms in literary translation. Extended version of a paper read at the International Leuven Colloquium on ‘Literature and Translation: New Perspectives in Literary Studies’, The Catholic University of Leuven, 27–30 April 1976, and published in In Search of a Theory of Translation (1980). Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, 51–62.Google Scholar

Toury, G. (1977). Normot sel tirgumve-ha-tirgum ha-sifruti le-ivrit ba-sanim 1930–1945 (Translational Norms and Literary Translation into Hebrew, 1930–1945). Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar

Toury, G. (1978/1980). Translated literature: System, norm, performance: Toward a TT-oriented approach to literary translation. Paper read at the International Symposium on ‘Translation Theory and Intercultural Relations’, Tel Aviv University, March 1978 and published in In Search of a Theory of Translation (1980). Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, 35–50.Google Scholar

Toury, G. (1991). What are descriptive studies into translation likely to yield apart from isolated descriptions. In van Leuven-Zwart, K. and Naaijkens, T. (eds.), Translation Studies: The State of the Art. Proceedings from the First James, S. Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–192.Google Scholar

Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toury, G. (2012). Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond, revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Truss, L. (2003). Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Tytler, A. (1792). Essay on the Principles of Translation. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (2022). Report A/77/91 Pattern of Conferences. UN Secretary-General. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/n22/389/25/pdf/n2238925.pdf (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

Van der Meer, J. (2020). Translation technology: Past, present and future. In Angelone, Ehrensberger-Dow and Massey (eds.), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1972). Some Aspects of Text Grammars: A Study in Theoretical Linguistics and Poetics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Doorslaer, L. (2009). How language and (non-)translation impacts on media news-rooms: The case of newspapers in Belgium. Perspectives 17(2), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Doorslaer, L. (2012). Translating, narrating and constructing images in journalism with a test case on representation in Flemish TV news. Meta 57(4), 1046–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermeer, H. (1978). Ein Rahmen für eine allgemeine Translationstheorie (A framework for a general theory of translation). Lebende Sprachen 23(3), 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vermeer, H. (1989/2000). Skopos and commission in translational action. In Chesterman, A. (ed. and trans.), Readings in Translation Theory. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ob, 173–187. Reprinted in Venuti, L. (ed.) (2000), The Translation Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 221–232.Google Scholar

Vienne, J. (1994). Toward a pedagogy of ‘translation in situation’. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 1, 51–59. Also published in French: ‘Pour une pédagogie de la traduction en situation’, in Snell-Hornby, M., Pöchhacker, F. and Kaindl, K. (eds.), Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vlachopoulos, S. (2018). Language for specific purposes and translation. In Malmkjær, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics. London: Routledge, 425–440.Google Scholar

Vuorinen, E. (1995). News translation as gatekeeping. In Snell-Hornby, M., Jettmarová, Z. and Kaindl, K. (eds). Translation as Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161–172. Also at www.arts.kuleuven.be/cetra/papers/files/vuorinen-1999.pdf (accessed 27 July 2020).Google Scholar

Wagner, E., Bech, S. and Martínez, J. M. (2002). Translating for the European Union Institutions. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Wiesel, E. (1958). La Nuit. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. German translation by Curt Meyer-Clason (2008). Die Nacht: Erinnerung und Zeugnis. Freiburg: Verlag Herder. English translation by Marion Wiesel (2006). Night. London: Penguin Books. The book is based on the Yiddish און די װעלט האט געשװיגן (Un di velt hot geshvign 1955 And the world kept silent). Buenos Aires: Union Central Israelita Polaca.Google Scholar

Williams, J. and Chesterman, A. (2002). The Map: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Translation Studies. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar

Zanettin, F. (2013). Corpus methods for descriptive translation studies. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences 95, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zethsen, K. K. and Askehave, I. (2006). Medical communication: Professional–lay. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., Vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 644–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zethsen, K. K. and Montalt, V. (2022). Translating medical texts. In Malmkjær (ed.), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zielinska-Elliott, A. and Kaminka, I. (2017). Online multilingual collaboration: Haruki Murakami’s European translations. In Cordingly, A. and Frigau Manning, C. (eds.), Collaborative Translation: From the Renaissance to the Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury, 167–191.Google Scholar

Zwischenberger, C. 2022. Online collaborative translation: Its ethical, social, and conceptual conditions and consequences. Perspectives 30(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Bible Society. www.americanbible.org/ (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. www.astm.org (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

American Translators Association. www.atanet.org/ (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

British Medical Journal. www.bmj.com (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

British National Corpus (BNC). www.english-corpora.org/bnc/ (accessed 30 January 2024).Google Scholar

Canadian Hansard. www.ourcommons.ca (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL). www.ciol.org.uk (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL). Professional Code of Conduct. www.ciol.org.uk/code (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

Code of Good Subtitling Practice. /www.esist.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Code-of-Good-Subtitling-Practice.PDF.pdf (accessed 24 November 2024).Google Scholar

Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_10740/en/) (accessed 28 February 2023).Google Scholar

CRITT Translation Process Research Database (TPR-DB). https://sites.google.com/site/centretranslationinnovation/tpr-db (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Ethnologue: Languages of the World. www.ethnologue.com (accessed 11 July 2022).Google Scholar

EUR-lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

European Commission. Checklist for Outgoing Translations. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/translation_checklist_en.pdf (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Diploma supplement form. http://ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/EHEAParis2018_Communique_AppendixIV_952782.pdf (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

European Union Careers. Applications Tests. https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/selection-procedure/epso-tests (accessed 18 November 2024).Google Scholar

Globalization and Localization Association. www.gala-global.org/ (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Institute of Translation and Interpreting (ITI). www.iti.org.uk (accessed 7 June 2024).Google Scholar

Institute of Translation and Interpreting (ITI). How to become a translator. www.iti.org.uk/starting-out/how-to-become-a-translator.html (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Microsoft Bing Translator. www.bing.com/translator (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

ProZ.com. www.proz.com/ (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

Sandberg Translation Partners Ltd. https://stptrans.com/nordic-translation-specialists/ (accessed 10 January 2024).Google Scholar

SIL International. www.sil.org/tags/summer-institute-linguistics (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Sketch Engine. https://sketchengine.eu (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Smartcat. Translation jobs: Top 15 websites for freelance work 2024. www.smartcat.com/blog/top-15-websites-to-get-freelance-translation-jobs/ (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Society of Authors. Guidance on relay translation. www2.societyofauthors.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Guidance-on-Relay-Translations.pdf (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

TOBII eye-tracker. www.tobii.com (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Tomedes Translator’s Blog. What has the United Nations done for the translation industry? www.tomedes.com/translator-hub/what-united-nations-translation-industry (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations Careers. https://careers.un.org/home?language=en (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations Department for General Assembly and Conference Management (DGACM). Translation. www.un.org/dgacm/en/content/translation (accessed 7 June 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Verband deutschsprachiger Übersetzer/innen literarischer und wissenschaftlicher Werke (VdÜ) (Association of German-Speaking Translators of Literary and Scientific Works). https://literaturuebersetzer.de/ (accessed 25 January 2024).Google Scholar

Worldometer. www.worldometers.info (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

American Bible Society. www.americanbible.org/ (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International. www.astm.org (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

American Translators Association. www.atanet.org/ (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

British Medical Journal. www.bmj.com (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

British National Corpus (BNC). www.english-corpora.org/bnc/ (accessed 30 January 2024).Google Scholar

Canadian Hansard. www.ourcommons.ca (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL). www.ciol.org.uk (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Chartered Institute of Linguists (CIOL). Professional Code of Conduct. www.ciol.org.uk/code (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

Code of Good Subtitling Practice. /www.esist.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Code-of-Good-Subtitling-Practice.PDF.pdf (accessed 24 November 2024).Google Scholar

Court of Justice of the European Union. https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_10740/en/) (accessed 28 February 2023).Google Scholar

CRITT Translation Process Research Database (TPR-DB). https://sites.google.com/site/centretranslationinnovation/tpr-db (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Ethnologue: Languages of the World. www.ethnologue.com (accessed 11 July 2022).Google Scholar

EUR-lex. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

European Commission. Checklist for Outgoing Translations. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2016-11/translation_checklist_en.pdf (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Diploma supplement form. http://ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/EHEAParis2018_Communique_AppendixIV_952782.pdf (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

European Union Careers. Applications Tests. https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/selection-procedure/epso-tests (accessed 18 November 2024).Google Scholar

Globalization and Localization Association. www.gala-global.org/ (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Institute of Translation and Interpreting (ITI). www.iti.org.uk (accessed 7 June 2024).Google Scholar

Institute of Translation and Interpreting (ITI). How to become a translator. www.iti.org.uk/starting-out/how-to-become-a-translator.html (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

Microsoft Bing Translator. www.bing.com/translator (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

ProZ.com. www.proz.com/ (accessed 26 January 2024).Google Scholar

Sandberg Translation Partners Ltd. https://stptrans.com/nordic-translation-specialists/ (accessed 10 January 2024).Google Scholar

SIL International. www.sil.org/tags/summer-institute-linguistics (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Sketch Engine. https://sketchengine.eu (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Smartcat. Translation jobs: Top 15 websites for freelance work 2024. www.smartcat.com/blog/top-15-websites-to-get-freelance-translation-jobs/ (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Society of Authors. Guidance on relay translation. www2.societyofauthors.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Guidance-on-Relay-Translations.pdf (accessed 20 November 2024).Google Scholar

TOBII eye-tracker. www.tobii.com (accessed 5 June 2024).Google Scholar

Tomedes Translator’s Blog. What has the United Nations done for the translation industry? www.tomedes.com/translator-hub/what-united-nations-translation-industry (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations Careers. https://careers.un.org/home?language=en (accessed 24 January 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations Department for General Assembly and Conference Management (DGACM). Translation. www.un.org/dgacm/en/content/translation (accessed 7 June 2024).Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar

Verband deutschsprachiger Übersetzer/innen literarischer und wissenschaftlicher Werke (VdÜ) (Association of German-Speaking Translators of Literary and Scientific Works). https://literaturuebersetzer.de/ (accessed 25 January 2024).Google Scholar

Worldometer. www.worldometers.info (accessed 22 November 2024).Google Scholar