Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:17:47.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

42 - Vascular Access: Venous and Arterial Ports

from PART IV - SPECIALIZED INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES IN CANCER CARE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2010

Thierry de Baère
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Interventional Radiology Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France
Eric Desruennes
Affiliation:
Department of Interventional Radiology Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif, France
Jean-François H. Geschwind
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael C. Soulen
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Externalized central venous catheters and totally implantable central venous access port systems are widely used to improve venous access reliability in patients receiving prolonged courses of cytotoxic therapy, anti-infectious chemotherapy or long-term parenteral nutrition. Totally implantable venous access port systems have several advantages over externalized catheters, including reliable venous access, low incidence of infection, absence of maintenance and fewer restrictions on activities such as bathing and sports. Ports are usually inserted by surgeons, anesthesiologists or radiologists in order to gain direct access to the central circulation as well as the hepatic artery to deliver cytotoxic drug directly to the liver. At the current time, minimally invasive techniques provided by interventional radiologists allow placement of catheter or port systems for intra-arterial hepatic chemotherapy (IAHC) without the need for open surgery or repeated catheterization.

Other directed intra-arterial therapies have been used, namely in the pelvis, but will not be described in this chapter, which will deal with central venous catheter and port placement for hepatic intra-arterial therapy.

VENOUS PORTS

Description

These devices consist of a port made of titanium or plastic with a self-sealing septum, accessible by percutaneous needle puncture, and a radiopaque catheter usually made in a well-tolerated long-term substance – silicone or polyurethane. Most ports are single lumen, but there are others with two lumens for separate administration of incompatible drugs. The connection between the catheter and the port can either be sealed during the manufacturing process or made at the time of placement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interventional Oncology
Principles and Practice
, pp. 533 - 543
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, D R and Minton, J P. The “pinch-off sign”: A warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. Am J Surg 1984; 148: 633–636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouaknine-Orlando, B, Desruennes, E, Cosset, M F, et al. The pinch-off syndrome: Main cause of catheter embolism. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1999; 18: 949–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hind, D, Calvert, N, McWilliams, R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: Meta-analysis. BMJ 2003; 327: 361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertoglio, S, Disomma, C, Meszaros, P, et al. Long-term femoral vein central venous access in cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22: 162–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolosker, N, Yazbek, G, Munia, M A, et al. Totally implantable femoral vein catheters in cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004; 30: 771–775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cadman, A, Lawrance, J A, Fitzsimmons, L, et al. To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 349–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciani, A, Clement, O, Halimi, P, et al. Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: A prospective study based on Doppler US. Radiology 2001; 220: 655–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labourey, J L, Lacroix, P, Genet, D, et al. Thrombotic complications of implanted central venous access devices: Prospective evaluation. Bull Cancer 2004; 91: 431–436.Google ScholarPubMed
Buller, H R, Agnelli, G, Hull, R D, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 401S–428S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Couban, S, Goodyear, M, Burnell, M, et al. Randomized placebo-controlled study of low-dose warfarin for the prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005 Jun 20; 23(18): 4063–4069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, P, Kretzschmar, A, Biakhov, M, et al. A phase III randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of daily low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin sodium, fragmin) in preventing catheter-related complications in cancer patients with central venous catheters. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 289–296.Google Scholar
Geerts, W H, Pineo, G F, Heit, J A, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126: 338S–400S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blot, F, Nitenberg, G, Chachaty, E, et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: A prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 1999; 354: 1071–1077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messing, B, Peitra-Cohen, S, Debure, A, et al. Antibiotic-lock technique: A new approach to optimal therapy for catheter-related sepsis in home-parenteral nutrition patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1988; 12: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessoud, B, Baere, T, Kuoch, V, et al. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, H, Pietsch, M, Krause, U, et al. Implanted vascular access systems: Experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg, 1998; 22: 12–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahon, T and Lawrence, D Sr.Technical report: An injection technique for repositioning subclavian catheters. Clin Radiol, 1991; 44: 197–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roizenthal, M and Hartnell, G. The misplaced central venous catheter: A long loop technique for repositioning. JVIR, 1995; 6: 263–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currarino, G. Migration of jugular or subclavian venous catheters into inferior tributaries of the brachiocephalic veins or into the azygos vein, with possible complications. Pediatr Radiol, 1996; 26: 439–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskal, Z, Leen, V, Thomas-Hawkins, C, et al. Transvenous removal of fibrin sheaths from tunneled hemodialysis catheter. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1996; 7: 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knelson, M, Hudson, E, Suhocki, P, et al. Functional restoration of occluded central venous catheter: New interventional techniques. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1995; 6: 623–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seki, H, Kimura, M, Yoshimura, N, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using percutaneous catheter placement with an implantable port: Assessment of factors affecting patency of the hepatic artery. Clin Radiol, 1999; 54: 221–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, J Y, Jang, B K, Kwon, K M, et al. Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin-C. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2005; 45: 118–124.Google ScholarPubMed
Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer. Reappraisal of hepatic arterial infusion in the treatment of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1996; 252–258.
Kemeny, N E, Niedzwiecki, D, Hollis, D R, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion versus systemic therapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: A randomized trial of efficacy, quality of life, and molecular markers (CALGB 9481). J Clin Oncol, 2006; 24: 1395–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boige, V, Lacombe, S, and Baere, T. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin combined with 5FU and folinic acid in nonresectable liver metastasis of colorectal cancer: A promising option for failures to systemic chemotherapy. Proceedings of ASCO 2003. J Clin Oncol, 2003; 22: 291.Google Scholar
Kemeny, N, Jarnagin, W, Paty, P, et al. Phase I trial of systemic oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy with hepatic arterial infusion in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005; 23: 4888–4896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemeny, N, Huang, Y, Cohen, A, et al. Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 2039–2048.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, M and Gonzales, J. Laparoscopic placement of hepatic artery catheter for regional chemotherapy infusion. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2002; 12: 398–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habbe, T G, McCowan, T C, Goertzen, T C, et al. Complications and technical limitations of hepatic arterial infusion catheter placement for chemotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1998; 9: 233–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrmann, K A, Waggershauser, T, Sittek, H, et al. Liver intraarterial chemotherapy: Use of the femoral artery for percutaneous implantation of catheter-port systems. Radiology, 2000; 215: 294–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, T, Arai, Y, Inaba, Y, et al. Radiologic placement of side-hole catheter with tip fixation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003; 14: 63–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanon, C, Grosso, M, Clara, R, et al. Combined regional and systemic chemotherapy by a mini-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Am J Clin Oncol, 2001; 24: 354–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castaing, D, Azoulay, D, Fecteau, A, et al. Implantable hepatic arterial infusion device: Placement without laparotomy, via an intercostal artery. J Am Coll Surg, 1998; 187: 565–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosso, M, Zanon, C, Zanon, E, et al. The percutaneous placement of intra-arterial catheters with “reservoirs” for subcutaneous infusion: The technique and preliminary results. Radiol Med (Torino), 1997; 94: 226–232.Google ScholarPubMed
Aldrighetti, L, Arru, M, Angeli, E, et al. Percutaneous vs. surgical placement of hepatic artery indwelling catheters for regional chemotherapy. Hepatogastroenterology, 2002; 49: 513–517.Google ScholarPubMed
Baere, T, Fassy, El E, Lapeyre, M, et al. Intra-arterial hepatic (IAH) oxaliplatinum through ports implanted percuteanously in the femoral artery. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2004; 15 (Abstr): S226.Google Scholar
Inaba, Y, Arai, Y, Matsueda, K, et al. Right gastric artery embolization to prevent acute gastric mucosal lesions in patients undergoing repeat hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2001; 12: 957–963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducreux, M, Ychou, M, Laplanche, A, et al. Hepatic arterial oxaliplatin infusion plus intravenous chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with inoperable hepatic metastases: A trial of the gastrointestinal group of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005; 23: 4881–4887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okuno, K, Yasutomi, M, Kon, M, et al. Intrahepatic interleukin-2 with chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases: A randomized multicenter trial. Hepatogastroenterology, 1999; 46: 1116–1121.Google ScholarPubMed
Shankar, A, Loizidou, M, Burnstock, G, et al. Noradrenaline improves the tumour to normal blood flow ratio and drug delivery in a model of liver metastases. Br J Surg, 1999; 86: 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×